Library / Laws / 113th / s / S. 881 / Introduced in Senate
II
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 881
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 7, 2013
Mrs. Gillibrand (for
herself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the
following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on
Finance
A BILL
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an
income tax credit for the costs of certain infertility treatments, and for
other purposes.
1.
Short
title
This Act may be cited as
the Family Act of
2013.
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1) The American
Society of Reproductive Medicine recognizes infertility as a disease, and the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have described infertility as an
emerging public health priority in the United States. Globally, the World
Health Organization also formally recognizes infertility as a disease.
(2) According to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 3,000,000 Americans
suffer from infertility.
(3) A portion of
those 3,000,000 people are cancer survivors who were diagnosed as infants,
children, or young adults. Their treatments included chemotherapy, radiation,
and surgery which have led to irreparable damage to their reproductive
systems.
(4) Military families
notably are also impacted by infertility as a result of lower extremity war
injuries arising from the perils of modern warfare. For active duty
individuals, frequent changes in permanent duty station, combat deployments,
and training rotations complicate access to fertility treatments. In addition,
active duty individuals or veterans have no coverage for in vitro fertilization
(IVF) through their military health insurance and must pay out of pocket for
those expenses, even within military treatment facilities.
(5) For many, the
cost of treatment for the disease of infertility is prohibitive. According to
the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the cost per cycle of IVF is
approximately $12,500, and on average couples require at least 2 cycles. Many
couples have to choose between their desire to establish a family and their
future financial well-being.
(6) Medical insurance
coverage for infertility treatments is sparse and inconsistent at the State
level. Only 8 States have passed laws to require comprehensive infertility
coverage, and under those State laws employer-sponsored plans are exempt;
therefore, coverage for treatments such as IVF is limited. According to
Mercer's 2005 National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans, IVF was
voluntarily covered by 19 percent of large employer-sponsored health plans and
only 11 percent of small employer-sponsored health plans. Even in States with
coverage mandates, out-of-pocket expenses for these treatments are
significant.
(7) According to the
latest National Survey of Family Growth, African-American and Hispanic women
are more likely to be infertile than Caucasian women, yet studies indicate that
they are less likely to use infertility services.
3.
Credit for
certain infertility treatments
(a)
In
general
Subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before section 24 the
following new section:
23A.
Credit for
certain infertility treatments
(a)
Allowance of
credit
In the case of an eligible individual, there shall be
allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable
year an amount equal to 50 percent of the qualified infertility treatment
expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year.
(b)
Limitations
(1)
Dollar
limitation
The amount of the credit under subsection (a) for any
taxable year shall not exceed the excess (if any) of—
(A) the dollar amount
in effect under section 23(b)(1) for the taxable year, over
(B) the aggregate
amount of the credits allowed under subsection (a) for all preceding taxable
years.
(2)
Income
limitation
(A)
In
general
The amount otherwise allowable as a credit under
subsection (a) for any taxable year (determined after the application of
paragraph (1) and without regard to this paragraph and subsection (c)) shall be
reduced (but not below zero) by an amount which bears the same ratio to the
amount so allowable as—
(i) the amount (if
any) by which the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds the dollar amount in
effect under clause (i) of section 23(b)(2)(A); bears to
(ii) $40,000.
(B)
Determination
of adjusted gross income
For purposes of subparagraph (A),
adjusted gross income shall be determined without regard to sections 911, 931,
and 933.
(3)
Denial of
double benefit
(A)
In
general
No credit shall be allowed under subsection (a) for any
expense for which a deduction or credit is taken under any other provision of
this chapter.
(B)
Grants
No
credit shall be allowed under subsection (a) for any expense to the extent that
reimbursement or other funds in compensation for such expense are received
under any Federal, State, or local program.
(C)
Insurance
reimbursement
No credit shall be allowed under subsection (a) for
any expense to the extent that payment for such expense is made, or
reimbursement for such expense is received, under any insurance policy.
(4)
Limitation
based on amount of tax
In the case of a taxable year to which
section 26(a)(2) does not apply, the credit allowed under subsection (a) for
any taxable year shall not exceed the excess of—
(A) the sum of the
regular tax liability (as defined in section 26(b)) plus the tax imposed by
section 55; over
(B) the sum of the
credits allowable under this subpart (other than this section) and section 27
for the taxable year.
(c)
Carryforwards
of unused credit
(1)
Rule for years
in which all personal credits allowed against regular and alternative minimum
tax
In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2)
applies, if the credit allowable under subsection (a) exceeds the limitation
imposed by section 26(a)(2) for such taxable year reduced by the sum of the
credits allowable under this subpart (other than this section), such excess
shall be carried to the succeeding taxable year and added to the credit
allowable under subsection (a) for such succeeding taxable year.
(2)
Rule for other
years
In the case of a taxable year to which section 26(a)(2)
does not apply, if the credit allowable under subsection (a) exceeds the
limitation imposed by subsection (b)(4) for such taxable year, such excess
shall be carried to the succeeding taxable year and added to the credit
allowable under subsection (a) for such succeeding taxable year.
(3)
Limitation
No
credit may be carried forward under this subsection to any taxable year after
the 5th taxable year after the taxable year in which the credit arose. For
purposes of the preceding sentence, credits shall be treated as used on a
first-in first-out basis.
(d)
Qualified
infertility treatment expenses
For purposes of this
section—
(1)
In
general
The term qualified infertility treatment
expenses means amounts paid or incurred for the treatment of infertility
via in vitro fertilization if such treatment is—
(A) provided by a
licensed physician, licensed surgeon, or other licensed medical practitioner,
and
(B) administered with
respect to a diagnosis of infertility by a physician licensed in the United
States.
(2)
Treatments in
advance of infertility arising from medical treatments
In the
case of expenses incurred in advance of a diagnosis of infertility for
fertility preservation procedures which are conducted prior to medical
procedures that, as determined by a physician licensed in the United States,
may cause involuntary infertility or sterilization, such expenses shall be
treated as qualified infertility treatment expenses—
(A) notwithstanding
paragraph (1)(B), and
(B) without regard to
whether a diagnosis of infertility subsequently results.
Expenses
for fertility preservation procedures in advance of a procedure designed to
result in infertility or sterilization shall not be treated as qualified
infertility treatment expenses.
(3)
Infertility
The
term infertility means the inability to conceive or to carry a
pregnancy to live birth, including iatrogenic infertility resulting from
medical treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation or surgery. Such term does
not include infertility or sterilization resulting from a procedure designed
for such purpose.
(e)
Eligible
individual
For purposes of this section, the term eligible
individual means an individual—
(1) who has been
diagnosed with infertility by a physician licensed in the United States,
or
(2) with respect to
whom a physician licensed in the United States has made the determination
described in subsection (d)(2).
(f)
Filing
requirements
Married taxpayers must file joint returns. Rules
similar to the rules of paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) of section 21(e) shall
apply for purposes of this
section.
.
(b)
Conforming
amendments
(1) The table of
sections for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before the item relating to
section 24 the following new item:
Sec. 23A. Credit for certain infertility
treatments.
.
(2) Section 23(c)(1)
of such Code is amended by striking 25D and inserting
23A, 25D,.
(3) Section
25(e)(1)(C) of such Code is amended by inserting 23A, before
25D,.
(4) Section 1400C(d)
of such Code is amended by striking section 25D and inserting
sections 23A and 25D.
(c)
Effective
date
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2013.