Library / Laws / 113th / s / S. 683 / Introduced in Senate
II
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 683
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 9, 2013
Mr. Cornyn introduced
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs
A BILL
To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop
a comprehensive strategy to gain and maintain operational control of the
international borders of the United States, and for other
purposes.
1.
Short
title
This Act may be cited as
the Border Security Results Act of
2013.
2.
Reports on
current border security status
Not later than 60 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that
assesses and describes, as of such date, the state of operational control of
the international borders of the United States.
3.
Strategy To
achieve operational control of the border
(a)
Strategy To
secure the border
Not later than 120 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy for gaining and
maintaining operational control of all sectors of the international borders of
the United States by the date that is not later than two years after the date
of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (b). The
strategy shall include, at a minimum, a consideration of the following:
(1) An assessment of
principal border security threats.
(2) Efforts to
analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information between
Department of Homeland Security border security components.
(3) Efforts to increase situational
awareness.
(4) A comprehensive
border security technology plan for detection technology capabilities,
including a documented justification and rationale for technology choices,
deployment locations, fixed versus mobile assets, and a timetable for
procurement and deployment.
(5) Surveillance
capabilities developed or utilized by the Department of Defense, including any
technology determined to be excess by the Department of Defense.
(6) Use of manned
aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, including the camera and sensor
technology deployed on such assets.
(7) Technology
required to enhance security at ports of entry, including the installation of
nonintrusive detection equipment, radiation portal monitors, biometric
technology, and other sensors and technology that the Secretary determines
necessary.
(8) Operational
coordination of Department of Homeland Security border security
components.
(9) Cooperative
agreements with State, local, tribal, and other Federal law enforcement
agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern border, southern border, and in
the maritime environment.
(10) Agreements with
foreign governments that support the border security efforts of the United
States.
(11) Staffing
requirements for all border security functions.
(12) Resources and
other measures necessary to achieve a 50-percent reduction in the average wait
times of commercial and passenger vehicles at international land ports of entry
along the international borders of the United States.
(13) Metrics required
under subsections (e), (f), and (g).
(b)
Implementation
plan
Not later than 60 days after the submission of the strategy
under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees an implementation plan for each of the
Department of Homeland Security border security components to carry out such
strategy.
(c)
Situational
awareness
Not later than two years after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall achieve
situational awareness of the international borders of the United States.
(d)
Periodic
updates
Not later than 180
days after the submission of each Quadrennial Homeland Security Review required
under section 707 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 347) beginning
with the first such Review that is due after the implementation plan is
submitted under subsection (b), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit
to the appropriate congressional committees an updated—
(1) strategy under
subsection (a); and
(2) implementation
plan under subsection (b).
(e)
Metrics for
securing the border between ports of entry
Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall implement metrics to measure the effectiveness of security between ports
of entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An effectiveness
rate which measures the number of illegal border crossers who are turned back,
and the amount of narcotics seized, against the total estimated number of
illegal border crossers and amount of narcotics the Department of Homeland
Security’s border security components fail to apprehend or seize, as the case
may be.
(2) Estimates, using alternate methodologies,
including recidivism and survey data, of total attempted illegal border
crossings, the rate of apprehension of attempted illegal border crossings, and
the inflow into the United States of illegal border crossers who evade
apprehension.
(3) Estimates of the
impacts of the Border Patrol’s Consequence Delivery System on the rate of
recidivism of illegal border crossers.
(4) An understanding
of the current level of situational awareness.
(5) Amount of
narcotics seized between ports of entry.
(f)
Metrics for
securing the border at ports of entry
Not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall implement metrics to measure the effectiveness of security at ports of
entry, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An effectiveness rate which measures the
number of illegal border crossers who are turned back, and the amount of
narcotics seized, against the total estimated number of illegal border crossers
and amount of narcotics the Department of Homeland Security’s border security
components fail to apprehend or seize, as the case may be.
(2) The number of
infractions related to personnel and cargo committed by major violators who are
apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at such ports of
entry.
(3) The estimated
number of such infractions committed by major violators who are not so
apprehended.
(4) Estimates, using
alternate methodologies, including recidivism and survey data, of total
attempted illegal border crossings, the rate of apprehension of attempted
illegal border crossings, and the inflow into the United States of illegal
border crossers who evade apprehension.
(g)
Metrics for
securing the maritime border
Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall
implement metrics to measure the effectiveness of security in the maritime
environment, which shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An effectiveness
rate which measures the number of migrants apprehended, the number of migrants
turned back, and the amount of narcotics seized, against the total estimated
numbers of migrants and amount of narcotics the Department of Homeland
Security’s maritime security components fail to apprehend or seize, as the case
may be.
(2) An understanding
of the current level of situational awareness.
(3) A response rate which measures the
Department’s ability to respond to known maritime threats by placing assets
on-scene, compared to the total number of events with respect to which the
Department has known threat information.
(4) Partnerships with
international, State, local, tribal, and other Federal law enforcement
agencies.
(h)
Independent
assessment by a National Laboratory within the Department of Homeland Security
Laboratory Network
The Secretary of Homeland Security shall
request the head of a national laboratory within the Department of Homeland
Security laboratory network with prior expertise in border security to—
(1) provide an
independent assessment of the metrics implemented in accordance with
subsections (e), (f), and (g) to ensure each such metric’s suitability and
statistical validity; and
(2) make
recommendations for other suitable metrics that may be used to measure the
effectiveness of border security.
(i)
Evaluation by
the Government Accountability Office
(1)
In
general
The Secretary of
Homeland Security shall make available to the Government Accountability Office
the data and methodology used to develop the metrics implemented under
subsections (e), (f), and (g) and the independent assessment described under
subsection (h).
(2)
Report
Not
later than 270 days after receiving the data and methodology described in
paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on the suitability and
statistical validity of such data and methodology.
(j)
Certifications
relating to operational control
(1)
By the
secretary of homeland security
If the Secretary of Homeland Security
determines that operational control of the international borders of the United
States has been achieved, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States a
certification that so attests.
(2)
By the
comptroller general
(A)
Review
The Comptroller General of the United
States shall review the certification of the Secretary of Homeland Security
under paragraph (1) to verify if such certification is accurate.
(B)
Verification
and submission
If the Comptroller General of the United States
verifies the accuracy of the certification of the Secretary of Homeland
Security under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall, not later than 120
days after such verification, submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a certification that so attests.
(k)
GAO report on
border security duplication
Not later than one year after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report addressing
areas of overlap in responsibilities within the border security functions of
the Department of Homeland Security.
(l)
Reports
Not
later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually
thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committee a report on the following:
(1) A resource
allocation model for current and future year staffing requirements that
includes optimal staffing levels at all land, air, and sea ports of entry, and
an explanation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection methodology for aligning
staffing levels and workload to threats and vulnerabilities across all mission
areas.
(2) Detailed
information on the level of manpower available at all land, air, and sea ports
of entry and between ports of entry, including the number of canine and
agricultural officers assigned to each such port of entry.
(3) Detailed
information that describes the difference between the staffing the model
suggests and the actual staffing at each port of entry and between the ports of
entry.
(m)
Definitions
In
this Act:
(1)
Appropriate
congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional
committees means the Committee on
Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
(2)
Major
violator
The term major violator means a person or
entity that has engaged in serious criminal activities at any land, air, or sea
port of entry, including possession of narcotics, smuggling of prohibited
products, human smuggling, weapons possession, use of fraudulent United States
documents, or other offenses serious enough to result in arrest.
(3)
Operational
control
The term
operational control means a condition in which there is a 90
percent probability that illegal border crossers are apprehended and narcotics
and other contraband are seized.
(4)
Situational
awareness
The term situational awareness means
knowledge and an understanding of current illicit cross-border activity,
including cross-border threats and trends concerning illicit trafficking and
unlawful crossings along the international borders of the United States and in
the maritime environment, and the ability to predict future shifts in such
threats and trends.