H.R. 4435 — Reported in House

IB Union Calendar No. 329 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4435 [Report No. 113–446] IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 9, 2014 Mr. McKeon (for himself and Mr. Smith of Washington) (both by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services May 13, 2014 Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 9, 2014 A BILL To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 1. Short title (a) Short title This Act may be cited as the Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. (b) References Any reference in this or any other Act to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall be deemed to refer to the Howard P. Buck McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents (a) Divisions This Act is organized into four divisions as follows: (1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D—Funding Tables. (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Division A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS Title I—Procurement Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 101. Authorization of Appropriations. Subtitle B—Army Programs Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne reconnaissance low aircraft. Sec. 112. Plan on modernization of UH–60A aircraft of Army National Guard. Subtitle C—Navy Programs Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for Tomahawk block IV missiles. Sec. 122. Construction of San Antonio class amphibious ship. Sec. 123. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command. Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for moored training ship program. Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for mission modules for Littoral Combat Ship. Sec. 126. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship. Subtitle D—Air Force Programs Sec. 131.  Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. Sec. 132. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft. Sec. 133. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of U–2 aircraft. Sec. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment or transfer of KC–10 aircraft. Sec. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment of E–3 airborne warning and control system aircraft. Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters Sec. 141. Comptroller General report on F–35 aircraft acquisition program. Title II—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of Appropriations. Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 211. Preliminary design review of presidential aircraft recapitalization program. Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for armored multi-purpose vehicle program. Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike system. Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne reconnaissance systems. Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for weather satellite follow-on system. Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared systems space data exploitation. Sec. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared systems. Sec. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for protected tactical demonstration and protected military satellite communications testbed of the advanced extremely high frequency program. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 221. Revision to the service requirement under the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense Education Program. Sec. 222. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain defense research facility records. Sec. 223. Modification to cost-sharing requirement for pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. Title III—Operation and Maintenance Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. Subtitle B—Energy and Environment Sec. 311. Elimination of fiscal year limitation on prohibition of payment of fines and penalties from the Environmental Restoration Account, Defense. Sec. 312. Biannual certification by commanders of the combatant commands relating to the prohibition on the disposal of waste in open-air burn pits. Sec. 313. Exclusions from definition of chemical substance under Toxic Substances Control Act and report on lead ammunition. Sec. 314. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement. Sec. 315. Congressional notice of bulk purchase of alternative fuels for operational use. Sec. 316. Limitation on procurement of biofuels. Sec. 317. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries. Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment Sec. 321. Additional requirement for strategic policy on prepositioning of materiel and equipment. Sec. 322. Comptroller General reports on Department of Defense prepositioning strategic policy and plan for prepositioned stocks. Sec. 323. Pilot program on provision of logistic support for the conveyance of excess defense articles to allied forces. Subtitle D—Reports Sec. 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation and financial support for military museums. Sec. 332. Report on enduring requirements and activities currently funded through amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations. Sec. 333. Army assessment of the regionally aligned force. Sec. 334. Report on impacts of funding reductions on military readiness. Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority Sec. 341. Limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 351. Clarification of authority relating to provision of installation-support services through intergovernmental support agreements. Sec. 352. Sense of Congress on access to training ranges within United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. Sec. 353. Management of conventional ammunition inventory. Title IV—Military Personnel Authorizations Subtitle A—Active Forces Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. Subtitle B—Reserve Forces Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2015 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 421. Military personnel. Title V—Military Personnel Policy Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally Sec. 501. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by selective retirement boards to particular warrant officer year groups and specialties. Sec. 502. Relief from limits on percentage of officers who may be recommended for discharge during a fiscal year using enhanced authority for selective early discharges. Sec. 503. Repeal of requirement for submission to Congress of annual reports on joint officer management and promotion policy objectives for joint officers. Sec. 504. Options for Phase II of joint professional military education. Sec. 505. Limitation on number of enlisted aides authorized for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps. Sec. 506. Required consideration of certain elements of command climate in performance appraisals of commanding officers. Subtitle B—Reserve Component Personnel Management Sec. 511. Retention on the reserve active-status list following nonselection for promotion of certain health professions officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees. Sec. 512. Chief of the National Guard Bureau role in assignment of Directors and Deputy Directors of the Army and Air National Guards. Sec. 513. National Guard civil and defense support activities and related matters. Subtitle C—General Service Authorities Sec. 521. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records. Sec. 522. Additional required elements of Transition Assistance Program. Sec. 523. Extension of authority to conduct career flexibility programs. Sec. 524. Provision of information to members of the Armed Forces on privacy rights relating to receipt of mental health services. Sec. 525. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to close a prayer outside of a religious service according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. Sec. 526. Department of Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism. Sec. 527. Removal of artificial barriers to the service of women in the Armed Forces. Subtitle D—Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Prevention and Response Sec. 531. Improved Department of Defense information reporting and collection of domestic violence incidents involving members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 532. Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding use of mental health records by defense during preliminary hearing and court-martial proceedings. Sec. 533. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and related military justice enhancements to military service academies. Sec. 534. Consultation with victims of sexual assault regarding victims’ preference for prosecution of offense by court-martial or civilian court. Sec. 535. Enforcement of crime victims’ rights related to protections afforded by certain Military Rules of Evidence. Sec. 536. Minimum confinement period required for conviction of certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 537. Modification of Military Rules of Evidence relating to admissibility of general military character toward probability of innocence. Sec. 538. Confidential review of characterization of terms of discharge of members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual offenses. Sec. 539. Consistent application of rules of privilege afforded under the Military Rules of Evidence. Subtitle E—Military Family Readiness Sec. 545. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to transitional compensation for dependents of members separated for dependent abuse. Sec. 546. Improved consistency in data collection and reporting in Armed Forces suicide prevention efforts. Sec. 547. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces. Subtitle F—Education and Training Opportunities Sec. 551. Authorized duration of foreign and cultural exchange activities at military service academies. Sec. 552. Pilot program to assist members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment. Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education Sec. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 562. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in Department of Defense overseas dependents’ school system. Sec. 563. Expansion of functions of the Advisory Council on Dependents’ Education to include domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools. Sec. 564. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students. Sec. 565. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012. Subtitle H—Decorations and Awards Sec. 571. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization. Sec. 572. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge. Sec. 573. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. Subtitle I—Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements Sec. 581. Secretary of Defense review and report on prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces. Sec. 582. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of sexual assault. Sec. 583. Comptroller General report regarding management of personnel records of members of the National Guard. Sec. 584. Study on gender integration in defense operation planning and execution. Sec. 585. Deadline for submission of report containing results of review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases. Subtitle J—Other Matters Sec. 591. Inspection of outpatient residential facilities occupied by recovering service members. Sec. 592. Working Group on Integrated Disability Evaluation System. Sec. 593. Sense of Congress regarding fulfilling promise to leave no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted in Afghanistan. Title VI—Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. Sec. 602. No fiscal year 2015 increase in basic pay for general and flag officers. Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals. Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Sec. 621. Authority to enter into contracts for the provision of relocation services. Subtitle D—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations Sec. 631. Authority of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to enter into contracts with other Federal agencies and instrumentalities to provide and obtain certain goods and services. Sec. 632. Review of management, food, and pricing options for defense commissary system. Sec. 633. Restriction on implementing any new Department of Defense policy to limit, restrict, or ban the sale of certain items on military installations. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 641. Anonymous survey of members of the Armed Forces regarding their preferences for military pay and benefits. Title VII—Health Care Provisions Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 702. Clarification of provision of food to former members and dependents not receiving inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities. Subtitle B—Health Care Administration Sec. 711. Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities. Sec. 712. Surveys on continued viability of TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra. Sec. 713. Limitation on transfer or elimination of graduate medical education billets. Sec. 714. Review of military health system modernization study. Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters Sec. 721. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund. Sec. 722. Designation and responsibilities of senior medical advisor for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Sec. 723. Research regarding Alzheimer's disease. Sec. 724. Acquisition strategy for health care professional staffing services. Sec. 725. Pilot program on medication therapy management under TRICARE program. Sec. 726. Report on reduction of Prime Service Areas. Sec. 727. Comptroller General report on transition of care for post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury. Sec. 728. Briefing on hospitals in arrears in payments to Department of Defense. Title VIII—Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters Subtitle A—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations Sec. 801. Extension to United States Transportation Command of authorities relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy. Sec. 802. Extension of contract authority for advanced component development or prototype units. Sec. 803. Amendment relating to authority of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype projects. Sec. 804. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services. Subtitle B—Industrial Base Matters Sec. 811. Three-year extension of and amendments to test program for negotiation of comprehensive small business subcontracting plans. Sec. 812. Improving opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. Sec. 813. Plan for improving data on bundled and consolidated contracts. Sec. 814. Authority to provide education to small businesses on certain requirements of Arms Export Control Act. Sec. 815. Prohibition on reverse auctions for covered contracts. Sec. 816. SBA surety bond guarantee. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 821. Certification of effectiveness for Air Force information technology contracting. Sec. 822. Airlift service. Sec. 823. Compliance with requirements for senior Department of Defense officials seeking employment with defense contractors. Sec. 824. Procurement of personal protective equipment. Sec. 825. Prohibition on funds for contracts violating Executive Order No. 11246. Sec. 826. Requirement for policies and standard checklist in procurement of services. Title IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 902. Additional responsibility for Director of Operational Test and Evaluation. Sec. 903. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. Sec. 904. Requirement for congressional briefing before divesting of Defense Finance and Accounting Service functions. Sec. 905. Combatant command efficiency plan. Sec. 906. Requirement for plan to reduce geographic combatant commands to four by fiscal year 2020. Sec. 907. Office of Net Assessment. Sec. 908. Amendments relating to organization and management of the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Sec. 909. Periodic review of Department of Defense management headquarters. Subtitle B—Total Force Management Sec. 911. Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management, functional, and technical workforce of the Department of Defense. Sec. 912. Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on inventory. Sec. 913. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency. Sec. 914. Prohibition on conversion of functions performed by civilian or contractor personnel to performance by military personnel. Sec. 915. Notification of compliance with section relating to procurement of services. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 921. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense regional centers for security studies. Sec. 922. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense and Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while performing official travel. Sec. 923. Single standard mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles of Government employees and members of the uniformed services. Title X—General Provisions Subtitle A—Financial Matters Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Repeal of limitation on Inspector General audits of certain financial statements. Sec. 1003. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization and naval reactors. Sec. 1004. Management of Defense information technology systems. Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. Sec. 1012. Three-year extension of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies. Sec. 1013. Submittal of biannual reports on use of funds in the drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide account on the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. Sec. 1014. National Guard drug interdiction and counter-drug activities. Sec. 1015.  Sense of Congress on Mexico and Central America. Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards Sec. 1021. Definition of combatant and support vessel for purposes of the annual plan and certification relating to budgeting for construction of naval vessels. Sec. 1022. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund. Sec. 1023. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval flight officer be in command of an inactivated nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning. Sec. 1024. Limitation on expenditure of funds until commencement of planning of refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George Washington. Sec. 1025. Sense of Congress recognizing the anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. Thresher. Sec. 1026. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships. Subtitle D—Counterterrorism Sec. 1031. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism. Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1033. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations Sec. 1041. Modification of Department of Defense authority for humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance programs. Sec. 1042. Authority to accept voluntary services of law students and persons studying to be paralegals. Sec. 1043. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the Department of Defense reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense entities. Sec. 1044. Repeal of authority relating to use of military installations by civil reserve air fleet contractors. Sec. 1045. Certification and limitation on availability of funds for aviation foreign internal defense program. Sec. 1046. Submittal of procedures and report relating to sensitive military operations. Sec. 1047. Limitation on use of Russian-flagged airlift aircraft to support the airlift movement requirements of the United States Transportation Command. Sec. 1048. Prohibition on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base until completion of assessments by Secretary of Defense and Government Accountability Office. Sec. 1049. Limitation on removal of C–130 aircraft. Sec. 1050. Conditions on Army National Guard and active Army force structure changes pending Comptroller General report. Subtitle F—Studies and Reports Sec. 1061. Protection of defense mission-critical infrastructure from electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems. Sec. 1062. Response of the Department of Defense to compromises of classified information. Sec. 1063. Report and briefing to Congress on procurement and inspection of armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles to transport civilian employees of the Department of Defense. Sec. 1064. Study on joint analytic capability of the Department of Defense. Subtitle G—Other Matters Sec. 1071. Technical and clerical amendments. Sec. 1072. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities. Sec. 1073. Revision to statute of limitations for aviation insurance claims. Sec. 1074. Pilot program for the human terrain system. Sec. 1075. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace. Sec. 1076. Sense of Congress on the life and achievements of Dr. James R. Schlesinger. Sec. 1077. Reform of quadrennial defense review. Sec. 1078. Resubmission of 2014 quadrennial defense review. Sec. 1079. Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive devices. Sec. 1080. Enhancing presence and capabilities and readiness posture of United States military in Europe. Sec. 1081. Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by the Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States. Title XI—Civilian Personnel Matters Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. Sec. 1103. Revision to list of Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories. Sec. 1104. Permanent authority for experimental personnel program for scientific and technical personnel. Sec. 1105. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities. Sec. 1106. Judicial review of Merit Systems Protection Board decisions relating to whistleblowers. Title XII—Matters relating to foreign nations Subtitle A—Assistance and training Sec. 1201. One-year extension of Global Security Contingency Fund. Sec. 1202. Notice to Congress on certain assistance under authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. Sec. 1203. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign military liaison officers of foreign countries while assigned to the Department of Defense. Sec. 1204. Annual report on human rights vetting and verification procedures of the Department of Defense. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan Sec. 1211. Extension of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. Sec. 1212. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1213. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces. Sec. 1214. Report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan under Operation Resolute Support. Sec. 1215. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 150 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. Sec. 1216. United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces through the end of fiscal year 2018. Sec. 1217. Sense of Congress on United States military commitment to Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan. Sec. 1218. Extension of Afghan special immigrant program. Subtitle C—Matters relating to the Russian Federation Sec. 1221. Limitation on military contact and cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation. Sec. 1222. Limitation on use of funds with respect to certification of certain flights by the Russian Federation under the Treaty on Open Skies. Sec. 1223. Limitations on providing certain missile defense information to the Russian Federation. Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds to transfer missile defense information to the Russian Federation. Sec. 1225. Report on non-compliance by the Russian Federation of its obligations under the INF Treaty. Sec. 1226. Sense of Congress regarding Russian aggression toward Ukraine. Sec. 1227. Annual report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation. Subtitle D—Matters relating to the Asia-Pacific region Sec. 1231. Strategy to prioritize United States interests in the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility and implementation plan. Sec. 1232. Modifications to annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1233. Report on goals and objectives guiding military engagement with Burma. Sec. 1234. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for United States Pacific Command. Sec. 1235. Missile defense cooperation. Sec. 1236. Maritime capabilities of Taiwan and its contribution to regional peace and stability. Sec. 1237. Independent assessment on countering anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region. Sec. 1238. Sense of Congress reaffirming security commitment to Japan. Sec. 1239. Sense of Congress on opportunities to strengthen relationship between the United States and the Republic of Korea. Subtitle E—Other matters Sec. 1241. Extension of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism. Sec. 1242. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. Sec. 1243. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. Sec. 1244. Modification of national security planning guidance to deny safe havens to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates. Sec. 1245. Enhanced authority to acquire goods and services of Djibouti in support of Department of Defense activities in United States Africa Command area of responsibility. Sec. 1246. Strategic framework for United States security force assistance and cooperation in the European and Eurasian regions. Sec. 1247. Requirement of Department of Defense to continue implementation of United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and participation in Interagency Working Group. Sec. 1248. Department of Defense situational awareness of economic and financial activity. Sec. 1249. Treatment of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Sec. 1250. Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense systems. Subtitle F—Reports and sense of Congress provisions Sec. 1261. Report on New Normal and general mission requirements of United States Africa Command. Sec. 1262. Report on contractors with the Department of Defense that have conducted significant transactions with Iranian persons or the Government of Iran. Sec. 1263. Reports on nuclear program of Iran. Sec. 1264. Sense of Congress on United States presence and cooperation in the Arabian Gulf region to deter Iran. Sec. 1265. Sense of Congress on modernization of defense capabilities of Poland. Title XIII—Cooperative Threat Reduction Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs and Funds. Sec. 1302. Funding Allocations. Sec. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction activities with Russian Federation. Title XIV—Other Authorizations Subtitle A—Military Programs Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile Sec. 1411. Revisions to previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Title XV—Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 1501. Purpose. Sec. 1502. Procurement. Sec. 1503. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 1504. Military personnel. Sec. 1505. Other appropriations. Subtitle B—Financial Matters Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations. Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority. Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters Sec. 1521. Continuation of existing limitations on the use of funds in the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. Sec. 1522. Use of and transfer of funds from Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. Title XVI—Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters Subtitle A—Space Activities Sec. 1601. Department of Defense Space Security and Defense Program. Sec. 1602. Evolved expendable launch vehicle notification. Sec. 1603. Satellite communications responsibilities of Executive Agent for Space. Sec. 1604. Liquid rocket engine development program. Sec. 1605.  Pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite communication services. Subtitle B—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities Sec. 1611. Assessment and limitation on availability of funds for intelligence activities and programs of United States Special Operations Command and special operations forces. Sec. 1612. Annual briefing on the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands. Sec. 1613. One-year extension of report on imagery intelligence and geospatial information support provided to regional organizations and security alliances. Sec. 1614. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent. Sec. 1615. Air Force intelligence organization. Sec. 1616. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. Subtitle C—Cyberspace-Related Matters Sec. 1621. Executive agent for cyber test and training ranges. Subtitle D—Nuclear Forces Sec. 1631. Preparation of annual budget request regarding nuclear weapons. Sec. 1632. Independent review of the personnel reliability program of the Department of Defense and the human reliability program of the Department of Energy. Sec. 1633. Assessment of nuclear weapon secondary requirement. Sec. 1634. Retention of missile silos. Sec. 1635. Certification on nuclear force structure. Subtitle E—Missile Defense Programs Sec. 1641. Theater air and missile defense of allies of the United States. Sec. 1642. Sense of Congress on procurement and deployment of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle. Title XVII—Defense Audit Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Auditability Sec. 1701. Findings and purposes. Sec. 1702. Establishment of Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Audit Readiness. Sec. 1703. Duties of the Advisory Panel. Sec. 1704. Powers of the Advisory Panel. Sec. 1705. Advisory Panel personnel matters. Sec. 1706. Termination of the Advisory Panel. Division B—Military Construction Authorizations Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Effective date. Title XXI—Army Military Construction Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projects. Sec. 2106. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Title XXII—Navy Military Construction Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing. Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project. Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Title XXIII—Air Force Military Construction Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 project. Sec. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. Sec. 2305. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Title XXIV—Defense Agencies Military Construction Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. Sec. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Sec. 2406. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 projects pending submission of required reports. Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide. Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project. Title XXV—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Title XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. Subtitle B—Other Matters Sec. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects. Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. Sec. 2613. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. Title XXVII—Base Realignment and Closure Activities Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account. Subtitle B—Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 2721. Force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory and assessment of infrastructure necessary to support the force structure. Sec. 2722. Modification of property disposal procedures under base realignment and closure process. Sec. 2723. Final settlement of claims regarding caretaker agreement for former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah. Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes Sec. 2801. Prevention of circumvention of military construction laws. Sec. 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction. Sec. 2803. Use of one-step turn-key contractor selection procedures for additional facility projects. Sec. 2804. Extension of limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility. Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration Sec. 2811. Consultation requirement in connection with Department of Defense major land acquisitions. Sec. 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial institutions operating on military installations. Sec. 2813. Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority. Sec. 2814. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses relating to certain real property transactions. Sec. 2815. Special easement acquisition authority, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii. Sec. 2816. National security considerations for inclusion of Federal property on National Register of Historic Places or designation as National Historic Landmark under the National Historic Preservation Act. Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment Sec. 2831. Repeal or modification of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. Subtitle D—Land Conveyances Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial, La Jolla, California. Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Walter Reed Army Hospital, District of Columbia. Sec. 2843. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia. Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. Sec. 2845. Modification of conditions on land conveyance, Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, Illinois. Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, Robert H. Dietz Army Reserve Center, Kingston, New York. Sec. 2847. Exercise of reversionary interest, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma. Sec. 2848. Land conveyance, Hanford Site, Washington. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 2861. Memorial to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard. Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. Sec. 2863. Redesignation of Pohakuloa Training Area in Hawaii as Pohakuloa Training Center. Sec. 2864. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in Riverside, California. Sec. 2865. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio. Sec. 2866. Manhattan Project National Historical Park. Title XXIX—Military Land Transfers and Withdrawals to Support Readiness and Security Subtitle A—Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada Sec. 2901. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada. Sec. 2902. Water rights. Sec. 2903. Withdrawal. Subtitle B—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California Sec. 2911. Redesignation of Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area, California. Subtitle C—Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands Efficiency and Savings Sec. 2921. Elimination of termination date for public land withdrawals and reservations under Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999. Subtitle D—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California. Subtitle E—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Sec. 2941. Additional withdrawal and reservation of public land to support White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Division C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Title XXXI—Department of Energy National Security Programs Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other Defense Activities. Sec. 3104. Energy Security and Assurance. Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 3111. Design and use of prototypes of nuclear weapons for intelligence purposes. Sec. 3112. Authorized personnel levels of National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3113. Cost containment for Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project. Sec. 3114. Plutonium pit production capacity. Sec. 3115. Definition of baseline and threshold for stockpile life extension project. Sec. 3116. Production of nuclear warhead for long-range standoff weapon. Sec. 3117. Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium. Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security. Sec. 3119. Additional limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security. Sec. 3120. Limitation on availability of funds for nonproliferation activities between the United States and the Russian Federation. Sec. 3121. Limitation on availability of funds for defense nuclear nonproliferation activities at sites in the Russian Federation. Subtitle C—Plans and Reports Sec. 3131. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3132. Analysis and report on W88 Alt 370 program high explosives options. Sec. 3133. Analysis of existing facilities. Subtitle D—Other matters Sec. 3141. Technical corrections to Atomic Energy Defense Act. Sec. 3142. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security Administration Act. Title XXXII—Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Sec. 3201. Authorization. Sec. 3202. Inspector General of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Sec. 3203. Number of employees of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Title XXXIV—Naval Petroleum Reserves Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. Title XXXV—Maritime Administration Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2015. Sec. 3502. Special rule for DD-17. Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress on the role of domestic maritime industry in national security. Division D—Funding Tables Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. Title XLI—Procurement Sec. 4101. Procurement. Title XLII—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation Sec. 4201. research, development, test, and evaluation. Title XLIII—Operation and Maintenance Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. Title XLIV—Military Personnel Sec. 4401. Military personnel. Title XLV—Other Authorizations Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. Title XLVI—Military construction Sec. 4601. Military construction. Title XLVII—Department of Energy National Security Programs Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs. 3. Congressional defense committees In this Act, the term congressional defense committees has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS I Procurement A Authorization of Appropriations 101. Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. B Army Programs 111. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne reconnaissance low aircraft None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for aircraft procurement, Army, for the modernization of the communications intelligence subsystem of airborne reconnaissance low aircraft may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report that— (1) specifies which such subsystem will be used to modernize such aircraft; (2) explains how such subsystem was selected; (3) identifies the alternatives to such subsystem that the Secretary considered during such selection; and (4) details how such subsystem will be integrated into the signals intelligence modernization plan of the Army. 112. Plan on modernization of UH–60A aircraft of Army National Guard (a) Plan Not later than March 15, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a prioritized plan for modernizing the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard. (b) Additional elements The plan under subsection (a) shall set forth the following: (1) A detailed timeline for the modernization of the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard. (2) The number of UH–60L, UH–60L Digital, and UH–60M aircraft that the Army National Guard will possess upon completion of such modernization plan. (3) The cost, by year, associated with such modernization plan. C Navy Programs 121. Multiyear procurement authority for Tomahawk block IV missiles (a) Authority for multiyear procurement (1) In general Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more multiyear contracts for a period of not more than five years, beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year, for the procurement of Tomahawk block IV missiles. (2) Submission of written certification by Secretary of Defense For purposes of carrying out subsection (i)(1) of such section 2306b with respect to a contract entered into under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall substitute the date that is 45 days before the date on which the Secretary enters into a contract under section 121 of the Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 for March 1 of the year in which the Secretary requests legislative authority to enter into such contract. (b) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 122. Construction of San Antonio class amphibious ship (a) In general The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year for the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship. The Secretary may employ incremental funding for such procurement. (b) Condition on out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year. 123. Additional oversight requirements for the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command (a) Limitation on milestone b decision The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may not make any Milestone B acquisition decisions with respect to a covered element unless— (1) the Commander has submitted to the congressional defense committees the transition plan under subsection (b)(2); (2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics has submitted to such committees the certification under subsection (c)(1); and (3) the Secretary of the Navy has completed the review under subsection (d)(1). (b) Transition plan (1) In general The Commander shall develop a transition plan for undersea mobility capabilities that includes the following: (A) A description of the current capabilities provided by covered elements as of the date of the plan. (B) An identification and description of the requirements of the Commander for future undersea mobility platforms. (C) An identification of resources necessary to fulfill the requirements identified in subparagraph (B). (D) A description of the technology readiness levels of any covered element currently under development as of the date of the plan. (E) An identification of any potential gaps or projected shortfall in capability, along with steps to mitigate any such gap or shortfall. (F) Any other matters the Commander determines appropriate. (2) Submission The Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees the transition plan under paragraph (1). (c) Certification (1) In general Except as provided by paragraph (2), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall certify an acquisition strategy for covered elements developed by the Commander if such strategy— (A) is based on reasonable cost and schedule estimates to execute the product development and production plan; (B) the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment; and (C) the program complies with all relevant policies, regulations, and directives of the Secretary of Defense. (2) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the certification requirement in paragraph (1) if the Secretary— (A) determines that such certification is not in the interests of the United States; and (B) notifies the congressional defense committees of such determination, including justifications for making the waiver. (d) Review The Secretary of the Navy shall— (1) review the transition plan under subsection (b)(1) and the acquisition strategy described in subsection (c)(1); and (2) ensure that the development of requirements for the Navy and the acquisition plans of the Navy take into account such transition plan and acquisition strategy. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered element means any of the following elements of the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command: (A) The dry combat submersible-light program. (B) The dry combat submersible-medium program. (C) The next-generation submarine shelter program. (D) Any new dry combat submersible developed under the undersea mobility acquisition program of the United States Special Operations Command after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) The term Milestone B approval has the meaning given that term in section 2366(e) of title 10, United States Code. (f) Conforming repeal Section 144 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1325) is repealed. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for moored training ship program Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for shipbuilding and construction, Navy, for design, conversion, modification, or construction relating to the moored training ship program of the Navy, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that— (1) the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has reviewed and approved the need for two additional moored training ships; (2) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation has reviewed and certified the cost estimates of the moored training ship program; and (3) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics has reviewed and approved the budget, schedule, and construction plans for such two additional moored training ships. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for mission modules for Littoral Combat Ship None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the procurement of additional mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following: (1) The Milestone B program goals for cost, schedule, and performance for each increment. (2) Certification by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation with respect to the total number for each module type that is required to perform all necessary operational testing. 126. Extension of limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship Section 124(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 693) is amended by striking this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 and inserting this Act, the Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014 or 2015. D Air Force Programs 131. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to— (1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft; or (2) initiate an alternative communication, navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management program for C–130 aircraft that is designed or intended to replace the avionics modernization program described in paragraph (1). (b) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has obligated the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2015 for the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft. 132. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire A–10 aircraft. (b) Comptroller General study (1) Study The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study evaluating the platforms of the Air Force used, as of the date of the study, to conduct close air support missions. (2) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study under paragraph (1), including— (A) the cost per airframe carrying out the close air support missions described in such paragraph; (B) the capabilities of each platform evaluated under such study; and (C) a determination by the Comptroller General with respect to whether such airframes other than A–10 aircraft are able to successfully carry out such close air support missions. 133. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of U–2 aircraft None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage U–2 aircraft. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment or transfer of KC–10 aircraft None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended during such fiscal year to divest or transfer, or prepare to divest or transfer, KC–10 aircraft. 135. Limitation on availability of funds for divestment of E–3 airborne warning and control system aircraft None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to divest more than four E–3 airborne warning and control system aircraft, or disestablish any units of the active or reserve components associated with such aircraft, until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report consisting of— (1) a certification that the Secretary is able to meet all priority requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands relating to such aircraft with a planned force of 24 such aircraft; and (2) a detailed explanation how the Secretary will meet such requirements with such planned force. E Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 141. Comptroller General report on F–35 aircraft acquisition program (a) Annual report Not later than April 15, 2015, and each year thereafter until the F–35 aircraft acquisition program enters into full-rate production, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report reviewing such program. (b) Matters included Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The extent to which the F–35 aircraft acquisition program is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals. (2) The progress and results of developmental and operational testing. (3) The progress of the procurement and manufacturing of F–35 aircraft. (4) An assessment of any plans or efforts of the Secretary of Defense to improve the efficiency of the procurement and manufacturing of F–35 aircraft. II Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation A Authorization of Appropriations 201. Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201. B Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 211. Preliminary design review of presidential aircraft recapitalization program The milestone decision authority (as defined in section 2366b(g) of title 10, United States Code) may not make a waiver under section 2366b(d) of title 10, United States Code, with respect to the presidential aircraft recapitalization program of the Air Force. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for armored multi-purpose vehicle program (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for the armored multi-purpose vehicle program, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(1). (b) Report (1) In general Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committee a report on the armored multi-purpose vehicle program. (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An identification of the existing capability gaps of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned, as of the date of the report, to units outside of combat brigades. (B) An identification of the mission roles that are in common between— (i) such vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades; and (ii) the vehicles examined in the armor brigade combat team during the armored multi-purpose vehicle analysis of alternatives. (C) The estimated timeline and the rough order of magnitude of funding requirements associated with complete M–113 family of vehicles divestiture within the units outside of combat brigades and the risk associated with delaying the replacement of such vehicles. (D) A description of the requirements for force protection, mobility, and size, weight, power, and cooling capacity for the mission roles of M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades. (E) A discussion of the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades that are comparable to the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to armor brigade combat teams. (F) A discussion of whether a one-for-one replacement of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades is likely. (G) With respect to mission roles, a discussion of any substantive distinctions that exist in the capabilities of the M–113 family of vehicles that are needed based on the level of the unit to which the vehicle is assigned (not including combat brigades). (H) A discussion of the relative priority of fielding among the mission roles. (I) An assessment for the feasibility of incorporating medical wheeled variants within the armor brigade combat teams. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike system (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike system may be obligated or expended to award a contract for air vehicle segment development until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report under subsection (b). (b) Report Not later than December 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that— (1) certifies that a review of the requirements for air vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system is complete; and (2) includes the results of such review. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for airborne reconnaissance systems (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for imaging and targeting support of airborne reconnaissance systems, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees— (1) a detailed plan regarding using such funds for such purpose during fiscal year 2015; and (2) a strategic plan for the funding of advanced airborne reconnaissance technologies supporting manned and unmanned systems. (b) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for weather satellite follow-on system (a) Manifest The Secretary of the Air Force shall— (1) place the last remaining satellite of the defense meteorological satellite program on the launch manifest for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program; and (2) establish an additional launch, for acquisition during fiscal year 2015, under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program using full and open competition among certified providers. (b) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the plan under subsection (c). (c) Plan required The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a plan to meet the meteorological and oceanographic collection requirements of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council. The plan shall include the following: (1) How the Secretary will launch and use existing assets of the defense meteorological satellite program. (2) How the Secretary will use other sources of data, such as civil, commercial satellite weather data, and international partnerships, to meet such requirements. (3) An explanation of the relevant costs and schedule. (4) The requirements of the weather satellite follow-on system. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared systems space data exploitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for data exploitation under the space-based infrared systems, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees certification that— (1) such funds will be used in support of data exploitation of the current space-based infrared systems program of record, including the scanning and staring sensor; or (2) the data from such program of record, including such scanning and starring sensor, is being fully exploited and no further efforts are warranted. 217. Limitation on availability of funds for hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared systems (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared systems program, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record of such program until— (1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and (2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (b) Exception The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion opportunities for the program of record specified in subsection (a). (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (3) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for protected tactical demonstration and protected military satellite communications testbed of the advanced extremely high frequency program (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the protected tactical demonstration and protected military satellite communications testbed of the advanced extremely high frequency program, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record for such program until— (1) the completion of the ongoing analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and (2) a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (b) Exception The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion opportunities for the program of record specified in subsection (a). C Other Matters 221. Revision to the service requirement under the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation Defense Education Program Subparagraph (B) of section 2192a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (B) in the case of a person not an employee of the Department of Defense, the person shall enter into a written agreement to accept and continue employment for the period of obligated service determined under paragraph (2)— (i) with the Department of Defense; or (ii) with a public or private entity or organization outside the Department if the Secretary of Defense determines that employment of the person with such entity or organization for the purpose of such obligated service would provide a benefit to the Department. . 222. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain defense research facility records (a) Revision of functions of defense research facilities Subsection (b) of section 2364 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (3), by adding and after the semicolon; (2) in paragraph (4)— (A) by adding and issue between position and papers; (B) by striking combatant commands and inserting components of the Department of Defense; and (C) by striking ; and and inserting a period; and (3) by striking paragraph (5). (b) Definitions Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: (c) Defense research facility defined In this section, the term defense research facility means a Department of Defense facility which performs or contracts for the performance of— (1) basic research; or (2) applied research known as exploratory development. . 223. Modification to cost-sharing requirement for pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems Section 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended in the matter following paragraph (2) by striking at least one-half of the cost of such activities and inserting an appropriate share of the cost of such activities, as determined by the Secretary. III Operation and Maintenance A Authorization of Appropriations 301. Operation and maintenance funding Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. B Energy and Environment 311. Elimination of fiscal year limitation on prohibition of payment of fines and penalties from the Environmental Restoration Account, Defense Section 2703(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking for fiscal years 1995 through 2010,; and (2) by striking for fiscal years 1997 through 2010. 312. Biannual certification by commanders of the combatant commands relating to the prohibition on the disposal of waste in open-air burn pits Paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) is amended to read as follows: (2) Compliance (A) Certification of compliance Except as provided under subparagraph (B), the commander of each combatant command that is engaged in a contingency operation shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives biannual certifications that covered waste under the jurisdiction of the commander has not been disposed of in violation of the regulations prescribed pursuant to paragraph (1) during the period covered by the certification. (B) Notice of noncompliance If a commander determines that certification cannot be made under subparagraph (A) because, with respect to covered waste under the jurisdiction of the commander, no alternative disposal method was feasible for an open-air burn pit pursuant to regulations prescribed under paragraph (1), the commander shall notify the Secretary of Defense of such determination and the Secretary shall— (i) not later than 30 days after such determination is made, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of such determination, including the circumstances, reasoning, and methodology that led to such determination; and (ii) after notice is given under clause (i), for each subsequent 180-day-period during which covered waste is disposed of in the open-air burn pit covered by such notice, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives the justifications of the Secretary for continuing to operate such open-air burn pit. . 313. Exclusions from definition of chemical substance under Toxic Substances Control Act and report on lead ammunition (a) In general Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking , and and inserting and any component of such an article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers), and. (b) Assessment and report Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Secretaries of the other military departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of an assessment conducted by the Secretary of each of the following: (1) The total costs associated with the procurement of non-lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type. (2) The total costs associated with the qualification of non-lead alternatives for small arms, broken down by type. (3) An assessment of the extent to which non-lead variants of ammunition exist for small arms, and to the extent such variants exist, the extent to which such variants meet service requirements and specifications. 314. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by adding at the end the following: This section shall not apply to the Department of Defense.. 315. Congressional notice of bulk purchase of alternative fuels for operational use Not later than 60 days before making a bulk purchase of alternative fuels intended for operational use, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the intent to make such a purchase. Such notice shall include the total quantity of fuel, the cost, and the type of funding intended to be used to make the purchase. 316. Limitation on procurement of biofuels (a) In general Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the following dates: (1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department. (2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), and the sequestration in effect by reason of such Act, are no longer in effect. (b) Exceptions The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to biofuels purchased— (1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and certification; or (2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the Department. 317. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by law. C Logistics and Sustainment 321. Additional requirement for strategic policy on prepositioning of materiel and equipment Section 2229(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting support for crisis response elements, after service requirements,. 322. Comptroller General reports on Department of Defense prepositioning strategic policy and plan for prepositioned stocks Subsection (c) of section 321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended to read as follows: (c) Comptroller General Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and the prepositioning strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such review and including any additional information relating to the prepositioning strategic policy and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. (2) Follow-up reports Following the submittal of the initial report required under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall conduct annual reviews, for each of the subsequent three years, of the progress of the Department of Defense in implementing the strategic policy and the Department plan for prepositioned stocks, and submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of such progress, including any additional information related to the management of prepositioned stocks that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. . 323. Pilot program on provision of logistic support for the conveyance of excess defense articles to allied forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense may establish a pilot program to provide logistic support for the conveyance of excess defense articles to allied forces participating in bilateral or multilateral training activities with the Armed Forces of the United States. (b) Limitation In carrying out the pilot program under this section, the Secretary may only provide logistic support— (1) in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act and other relevant export control laws of the United States; (2) in accordance with section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j); (3) in direct support of training activities— (A) carried out in support of a contingency operation or a noncombat operation (including an operation in support of the provision of humanitarian or foreign disaster assistance, a country stabilization operation, or a peacekeeping operation under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations); or (B) if the Secretary determines that the provision of such support is in the best interest of the Armed Forces of the Unites States. (c) Limitation The total value of logistic support provided under subsection (a)(1) in any fiscal year may not exceed $10,000,000. (d) Termination The authority to carry out the pilot program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2016. (e) Report Not later than December 31 of each year during which the Secretary carried out a pilot program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program under this section during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which the report is submitted. Each such report shall contain each of the following for the fiscal year covered by the report: (1) Each nation for which logistic support was provided under the pilot program. (2) For each such nation, a description of the type and value of logistic support, and the excess defense article or articles conveyed. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term logistics support means— (A) the use of military transportation and cargo-handling assets, including aircraft; (B) materiel support in the form of fuel, petroleum, oil, or lubricants; and (C) commercially contracted transportation. (2) The term excess defense article has the meaning given such term in section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j). D Reports 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation and financial support for military museums (a) In general Section 489 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 489. 332. Report on enduring requirements and activities currently funded through amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations (a) Report required Not later than the date of the submission of the President’s budget for a fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes each of the following: (1) A list of enduring mission requirements, equipping, training, sustainment, and other operation and maintenance activities of the military departments, combat support agencies, and Department of Defense that are funded through amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations. (2) The amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the activities described in paragraph (1). (3) The amounts provided in the budget for fiscal year 2015 submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. (4) A three-year plan to migrate the requirements and activities on the list described in paragraph (1) to be funded other than through amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations. (b) Definition of enduring For purposes of this section, the term enduring means planned to continue to exist beyond the last day of the period covered by the future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 333. Army assessment of the regionally aligned force At the same time as the President transmits to Congress the budget for fiscal 2016 year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of how the Army has— (1) captured and incorporated lessons learned through the initial employment of the regionally aligned force in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility; (2) institutionalized and improved predeployment training; (3) improved the coordination of activities between special operations forces, Army regionally aligned units, contractors of the Department of State, contractors of the Department of Defense, the geographic combatant commands, the Joint Staff, and international partners; (4) accounted for all the various funding streams used to fund regionally aligned force activities, including the amount of funds expended from each account; (5) assessed the impacts associated with long-term commitments of regionally aligned forces to meet security cooperation requirements; (6) maintained high levels of core mission readiness while supporting geographic combatant commander requirements through regionally aligned force activities; (7) planned for expansion of the regionally aligned force model; and (8) planned to retain regional expertise within units habitually aligned to a specific region. 334. Report on impacts of funding reductions on military readiness (a) Report required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall report to the congressional defense committees on the readiness and cost impacts, both immediate and long-term, for the military services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Defense Agencies, of the reductions in funding required in section 4301 of this Act. Such report shall address each of the following categories: (1) Reduction in contracts for Other Services, including— (A) impacts on mission execution and effectiveness (B) subsistence and support of persons, including submarine galley maintenance in support of the Navy fleets; (C) the credentialing of health, legal, engineering, and acquisition professionals, including licenses, certifications, and national board examinations; (D) continuing education for military service members and their families, including tuition assistance and completion of graduate degrees, including correspondence courses; (E) scholarships, instructor pay, and textbooks for Reserve Officer Training Corps and Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps programs; (F) installation family support programs; (G) general training, including training outside normal occupational specialties such as cultural and language training for deploying forces; (H) physical fitness services; (I) the annual audit of financial records and annual review of acquisition programs; (J) drivers for security details; (K) foreign national indirect hires; (L) port visit costs and port visit security; (M) Defense Travel System afloat support; (N) engineering readiness assessment teams; (O) sexual assault and suicide prevention and response programs; (P) student meal programs and educational assistance purchases; (Q) employer support to the National Guard and Reserve; (R) Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program; and (S) network programming activities, database sustainment, and improvement. (2) Reductions in contracts for facility sustainment, restoration, and modernization, including— (A) impacts to mission execution and effectiveness; (B) impacts to life, health and safety, including fire and emergency services; (C) impacts to training; (D) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to mission-critical infrastructure, including roads, electrical systems, heating and air conditioning systems, and buildings; (E) deferrals of repairs or upgrades to airfield runways, taxiways and aprons; (F) installation security through the deferrals of repairs, replacements or reconfigurations of gates or other installation security components; (G) base operations due to deferral of facility renovations, consolidations, conversions, or demolitions; (H) operation of dining facilities; (I) utility privatization; (J) deferrals of repair and renovation of barracks; (K) facilities engineering services; (L) dredging of navigation channels; (M) execution of the minimum six percent capital investment program required under section 2476 of title 10, United States Code; and (N) maintenance, repairs, and modernization of Department of Defense dependent schools in Europe and the Pacific and defense domestic dependent elementary schools. (3) Reductions in civilian personnel, including— (A) mission execution and effectiveness; (B) the ability to recruit, hire, and train civilian employees; (C) the cost of overtime that will be generated as a result of unfilled civilian personnel billets; (D) the morale of the civilian workforce; and (E) the ability to execute reductions in force within the fiscal year. (4) Reductions in unobligated balances of prior-year funding, including: (A) mission execution and effectiveness; and (B) the ability to execute reductions within the fiscal year. (5) Any other information that the Under Secretary determines is relevant to enhancing the committees’ understanding of the impacts of the required reductions in funding. (b) Form of report The Comptroller General may report to the congressional defense committees, as required by subsection (a), either by providing a briefing or a written report. E Limitations and Extensions of Authority 341. Limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of the Air Force has structured the contract in such a way that provides the Secretary of the Air Force the required insight into all aspects of F117 system, subsystem, components, and subcomponents regarding historical usage rates, cost, price, expected and actual service-life, and supply chain management data sufficient to determine that the Secretary of the Air Force is paying a fair and reasonable price for F117 sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul as compared to the PW2000 commercial-derivative engine sustainment price for sustainment, maintenance, repair, and overhaul in the private sector. The Secretary may waive the limitation in the preceding sentence to enter into a contract if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the interest of national security. F Other Matters 351. Clarification of authority relating to provision of installation-support services through intergovernmental support agreements (i) Transfer of section 2336 to chapter 159 (1) Transfer and redesignation Section 2336 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 159 of such title, inserted after section 2678, and redesignated as section 2679. (2) Revised section heading The heading of such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is amended to read as follows: 2679. Installation-support services: intergovernmental support agreements . (b) Clarifying amendments Such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is further amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking The Secretary concerned and inserting Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary concerned; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an and inserting An; (ii) by striking subparagraph (A); and (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B) respectively; and (2) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following new paragraph: (4) The term intergovernmental support agreement means a legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the Secretary concerned and a State or local government that contains such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate for the purposes of this section and necessary to protect the interests of the United States. . (c) Clerical amendments (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2336. (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2678 the following new item: 2679. Installation-support Services: intergovernmental support agreements. . 352. Sense of Congress on access to training ranges within United States Pacific Command area of responsibility (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Reliable access to military training ranges is an essential component of military readiness. (2) The training opportunities provided by military training ranges are critical to maintaining the technical and operational superiority of the Armed Forces. (3) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that the operational readiness of the Armed Forces hinges on unimpeded access to land, air, and sea training and test space. (4) The 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review states that United States forces in the Asia-Pacific region will resume regular bilateral and multilateral training exercises, pursue increased training opportunities to improve capabilities and capacity of partner nations, as well as support humanitarian, disaster relief, counterterrorism, and other operations that contribute to the stability of the region. (5) A number of critical military training ranges, including the Pohakuloa Training Center in Hawaii, are located within the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility providing units from all the military services, as well as allied and partner militaries with realistic joint and combined arms training opportunities. (6) Due to the tyranny of distance in the Asia-Pacific region, there are significant challenges in transporting equipment and personnel to the various military training ranges within the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility. (7) The Department of Defense continues a number of efforts aimed at preserving military training ranges, while also minimizing the environmental effects of training activities. (8) The Department of Defense has a variety of authorities that may be used to mitigate encroachment on military testing and training missions. (b) Sense of congress In light of the findings specified in subsection (a), it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should— (1) ensure that members of the Armed Forces continue to have reliable access to military training ranges; (2) optimize the use of multilateral, joint training facilities overseas in order to increase readiness and interoperability with allies and partners of the United States; (3) utilize a full range of assets, including both air- and sea-based assets, including inactive Joint High Speed Vessels, to improve accessibility to military training areas within the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility; (4) provide stable budget authority for long-term investments in range and test center infrastructure to lower the cost of access to the ranges and training centers; (5) take appropriate action to identify and leverage existing authorities and programs, as well as work with State and municipalities to leverage their authorities, to mitigate encroachment or other challenges that have the potential to impact future access or operations on military training ranges; (6) maximize the use of the United States Pacific Command training ranges, including Pohakuloa Training Center in Hawaii, by the military departments and increase the use of such training ranges for bilateral and multilateral exercises with regional allies and partners; and (7) take appropriate action to leverage existing authorities and programs, as well as work with local governments to leverage their authorities, to address any challenges that have the potential to impede future access to or operations on military training ranges. 353. Management of conventional ammunition inventory (a) Consolidation of data Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in conjunction with the Secretaries of the Army, Air Force, and Navy, shall issue Department-wide guidance and designate an authoritative database on conventional ammunition. Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees on what database has been designated under this subsection. (b) Annual report The Secretary of the Army will include in its annual ammunition inventory reports information on all available ammunition for use during the redistribution process, including ammunition that was unclaimed in a during a year before the year during which the report is submitted by another service and categorized for disposal. IV Military Personnel Authorizations A Active Forces 401. End strengths for active forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows: (1) The Army, 490,000. (2) The Navy, 323,600. (3) The Marine Corps, 184,100. (4) The Air Force, 311,220. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (1) For the Army, 490,000. (2) For the Navy, 323,600. (3) For the Marine Corps, 184,100. (4) For the Air Force, 310,900. . B Reserve Forces 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve (a) In general The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2015, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 350,200. (2) The Army Reserve, 202,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 57,300. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,200. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 67,100. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 7,000. (b) End strength reductions The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by— (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End strength increases Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 31,385. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. (3) The Navy Reserve, 9,973. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,704. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,830. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status) The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210. (2) For the Army Reserve, 7,895. (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,792. (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 9,789. 414. Fiscal year 2015 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians (a) Limitations (1) National guard Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the following: (A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600. (B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350. (2) Army reserve The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 595. (3) Air force reserve The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 90. (b) Non-Dual status technicians defined In this section, the term non-dual status technician has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support During fiscal year 2015, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. C Authorization of Appropriations 421. Military personnel (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. (b) Construction of authorization The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2015. V Military Personnel Policy A Officer Personnel Policy Generally 501. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by selective retirement boards to particular warrant officer year groups and specialties Section 581(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); (2) by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); and (3) in paragraph (2), as so designated— (A) by striking the list shall include each and inserting the list shall include— (A) the name of each ; (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) with respect to a group of warrant officers designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers in that grade and competitive category who are also in a particular year group or specialty, or any combination thereof determined by the Secretary. . 502. Relief from limits on percentage of officers who may be recommended for discharge during a fiscal year using enhanced authority for selective early discharges Section 638a(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (3); and (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 503. Repeal of requirement for submission to Congress of annual reports on joint officer management and promotion policy objectives for joint officers (a) Repeal of annual reports (1) Joint officer management Section 667 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (2) Promotion policy objectives for joint officers Section 662 of such title is amended— (A) by striking (a) Qualifications.—; and (B) by striking subsection (b). (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 667. 504. Options for Phase II of joint professional military education Section 2154(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking consisting of a joint professional military education curriculum and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: consisting of— (A) a joint professional military education curriculum taught in residence at the Joint Forces Staff College or a senior level service school that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional military education institution; or (B) a senior level service course of at least ten months that has been designated and certified by the Secretary of Defense as a joint professional military education course. . 505. Limitation on number of enlisted aides authorized for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps (a) Modification of current limitation Section 981 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking the sum of (1) and all that follows through the period at end of the subsection and inserting the following: the sum of— (1) two times the number of officers serving on active duty at the end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of general or admiral; and (2) the number of officers serving on active duty at the end of the preceding fiscal year in the grade of lieutenant general or vice admiral. ; and (2) in subsection (b), by striking Not more than 300 enlisted members and inserting Not more than the lesser of 300 enlisted members or the number of enlisted members determined for a fiscal year under subsection (a). (b) Annual report Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report specifying— (1) the total number of enlisted members assigned to duty at any time during the previous fiscal year as enlisted aides for officers of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps; and (2) the number of authorized enlisted aides by each general officer and flag officer position during the previous fiscal year. . 506. Required consideration of certain elements of command climate in performance appraisals of commanding officers The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that the performance appraisal of a commanding officer in an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary indicates the extent to which the commanding officer has or has not established a command climate in which— (1) allegations of sexual assault are properly managed and fairly evaluated; and (2) a victim of criminal activity, including sexual assault, can report the criminal activity without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other members of the command. B Reserve Component Personnel Management 511. Retention on the reserve active-status list following nonselection for promotion of certain health professions officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees (a) Retention of certain first lieutenants and lieutenants (Junior grade) following nonselection for promotion Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking A reserve officer of and inserting (A) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of; (2) by striking of this title may, subject to the needs of the service and to section 14509 of this title, and inserting of this title, may; (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (B) A reserve officer covered by this subparagraph is a reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps who holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer of the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade), and who— (i) is a health professions officer; or (ii) is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of education leading to a baccalaureate degree. (C) The consideration of a reserve officer for continuation on the reserve active-status list pursuant to this paragraph is subject to the needs of the service and to section 14509 of this title. . (b) Retention of health professions officers Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Continuation of health professions officers (1) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions officer obligated to a period of service incurred under section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201 of this title shall be retained on the reserve active-status list until the completion of such service obligation and then discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another provision of law. (2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines that completion of the service obligation of that officer is not in the best interest of the service. (3) A health professions officer who is continued on the reserve active-status list under this subsection who is subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the officer’s service obligation. Such officer may continue on the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same grade unless separated under another provision of law. . 512. Chief of the National Guard Bureau role in assignment of Directors and Deputy Directors of the Army and Air National Guards (a) Recommendation by Chief of the National Guard Bureau Paragraph (1) of section 10506(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking selected by the Secretary of the Army and inserting recommended by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army,; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking selected by the Secretary of the Air Force and inserting recommended by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with the Secretary of the Air Force,. (b) Assistance to Chief of the National Guard Bureau Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by striking The officers so selected and inserting The Director and Deputy Director, Army National Guard, and the Director and Deputy Director, Air National Guard,. (c) Condition on assignment and conforming amendments Paragraph (3) of such section is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking The President and inserting Consistent with paragraph (1), the President; (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the Secretary of the military department concerned and inserting the Chief of the National Guard Bureau as provided in paragraph (1); (3) by striking subparagraph (D); and (4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (D). 513. National Guard civil and defense support activities and related matters (a) Operational use of the national guard (1) In general Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 116. Operational use of the National Guard (a) In general This section authorizes the operational use of the National Guard and recognizes that the basic premise of both the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework is that— (1) incidents are typically managed at the local level first; and (2) local jurisdictions retain command, control, and authority over response activities for their jurisdictional areas. (b) Assistance to Civilian Firefighting Organizations (1) Assistance authorized Members and units of the National Guard shall be authorized to support firefighting operations, missions, or activities, including aerial firefighting employment of the Modular Airborne Firefighting System (MAFFS), undertaken in support of a civilian authority or a State or Federal agency. (2) Role of governor and state adjutant general For the purposes of paragraph (1)— (A) the Governor of a State shall be the principal civilian authority; and (B) the adjutant general of the State shall be the principal military authority, when acting in his or her State capacity, and has the primary authority to mobilize members and units of the National Guard of the State in any duty status under this title the adjutant general deems appropriate to employ necessary forces when funds to perform such operations, missions, or activities are reimbursed. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 116. Operational use of the National Guard. . (b) Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) support Section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or may perform after subsection (a) may perform; and (2) by inserting (A) and (B) after specified in section 502(f)(2). (c) Federal technicians support Section 709(a)(3) of title 32, United States Code, is amended by inserting duty as specified in section 116(b) of this title or after (3) the performance of. C General Service Authorities 521. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records (a) Availability of judicial review; limitations (1) In general Chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to correction of military records (a) Availability of judicial review (1) In general Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5, any person adversely affected by a records correction final decision may obtain judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction to hear the matter. (2) Records correction final decision defined In this section, the term records correction final decision means any of the following decisions: (A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1552 of this title. (B) A final decision issued by the Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title. (C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1034(h) of this title. (D) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1554a of this title. (b) Exhaustion of administrative remedies (1) General rule Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to correction under a provision of law specified in subsection (a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other provision of law unless— (A) the petitioner has requested a correction under sections 1552 or 1554a of this title (including such a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title); and (B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision denying that correction in whole or in part. (2) Whistleblower cases When the final decision of the Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(h) of this title, the petitioner is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial review, but if the petitioner seeks such review, judicial review may not be sought until the earlier of the following occurs: (A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the matter. (B) The period specified in section 1034(h) of this title for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires. (3) Class actions If judicial review of a records correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a correction under section 1552 of this title (including a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title) and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case, paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to any matter covered by a claim for which the class is certified. (4) Timeliness Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on which the petitioner requests a correction. (c) Statutes of limitation (1) Six years from final decision A records correction final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2) applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court not later than six years after the date of the records correction final decision. (2) Six years for certain claims that may result in payment of money (A) In a case of a records correction final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records correction final decision (or the portion of such decision described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court before the end of the six-year period that began on the date of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death while on active duty, of the person whose military records are the subject of the correction request. Such period does not include any time between the date of the filing of the request for correction of military records leading to the records correction final decision and the date of the final decision. (B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction final decision or portion of the decision that involves a denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the court, would support, or result in, the payment of money either under a court order or under a subsequent administrative determination, other than payments made under— (i) chapter 61 of this title to a claimant who prior to such records correction final decision, was not the subject of a decision by a physical evaluation board or by any other board authorized to grant disability payments to the claimant; or (ii) chapter 73 of this title. (d) Habeas corpus This section does not affect any cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 1560. Judicial review of decisions. . (b) Effect of denial of request for correction of records when prohibited personnel action alleged (1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review Subsection (g) of section 1034 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (7) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the member or former member— (A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (B) a written notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. . (2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial Subsection (h) of such section is amended— (A) by inserting (1) before Upon the completion of all; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the member or former member— (A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (B) a written notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. . (3) Sole basis for judicial review Such section is further amended— (A) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections (j) and (k), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection (i): (i) Judicial review (1) A decision of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (h) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. (2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (h) was not sought, a decision of the Secretary of a military department under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. (3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. . (c) Effect of denial of other requests for correction of military records Section 1552 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (h) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall provide the claimant— (1) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (2) a written notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. (i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. . (d) Judicial review of corrections recommended by the physical disability board of review Section 1554a of such title is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (h); and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections (f) and (g): (f) Record of decision and notification In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary shall provide to the member or former member— (1) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (2) a written notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. (g) Judicial review A decision by the Secretary concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. . (e) Effective date and application (1) In general The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to all final decisions of the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(h) of title 10, United States Code, and of the Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security under sections 1034(g), 1552, or 1554a of such title rendered on or after such date. (2) Treatment of existing cases This section and the amendments made by this section do not affect the authority of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was properly before the court before the effective date specified in paragraph (1). (f) Implementation The Secretary of the military department concerned and, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may prescribe regulations, and interim guidance before prescribing such regulations, to implement the amendments made by this section. Regulations or interim guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military department may not take effect until approved by the Secretary of Defense. 522. Additional required elements of Transition Assistance Program (a) Information on educational assistance and other available benefits Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Additional elements of program The mandatory program carried out by this section also shall include the following: (1) For any such member who plans to use the member’s entitlement to educational assistance under title 38— (A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such entitlement; and (B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible with the member’s education goals, and instruction on how to finance the member’s post-secondary education. (2) Instruction in the benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects determined to be appropriate by the Secretary concerned. . (b) Deadline for implementation The program carried out under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall comply with the requirements of subsection (c) of such section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April 1, 2016. 523. Extension of authority to conduct career flexibility programs (a) Duration of program authority Subsection (m) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note), as amended by section 531(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1403) and redesignated by section 522(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1722), is amended by striking December 31, 2015 and inserting December 31, 2019. (b) Conforming amendments to reporting requirements Subsection (k) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, as amended by section 531(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking and 2017 and inserting , 2017, and 2019; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking March 1, 2019 and inserting March 1, 2020. 524. Provision of information to members of the Armed Forces on privacy rights relating to receipt of mental health services (a) Provision of information required The Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that the information described in subsection (b) is provided— (1) to each officer candidate during initial training; (2) to each recruit during basic training; and (3) to other members of the Armed Forces at such times as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (b) Required information The information required to be provided under subsection (a) shall include information on the applicability of Department of Defense Directive 6025.18 and other regulations regarding privacy prescribed pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191) to records regarding a member of the Armed Forces seeking and receiving mental health services. 525. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to close a prayer outside of a religious service according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group (a) United states army Section 3547 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (b) United states military academy Section 4337 of such title is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before There; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (c) United states navy and marine corps Section 6031 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (d) United states air force Section 8547 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (e) United states air force academy Section 9337 of such title is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before There; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . 526. Department of Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism (a) Initial congressional oversight In the development of the roles, responsibilities, and goals of the Department of Defense Senior Advisor on Professionalism to strengthen professionalism programs in the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense shall communicate with the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives regarding the mission, goals, and metrics for the Senior Advisor on Professionalism. (b) Initial review by Senior Advisor on Professionalism Upon appointment of the Senior Advisor on Professionalism, the Senior Advisor on Professionalism shall— (1) conduct a preliminary review of the effectiveness of current programs and controls of the Department of Defense and the military departments regarding professionalism; and (2) submit, not later than September 1, 2015, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives recommendations to strengthen professionalism programs in the Department of Defense. 527. Removal of artificial barriers to the service of women in the Armed Forces (a) Validation and oversight of gender-neutral occupational standards (1) Validation; purpose The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretary of each military department to validate the gender-neutral occupational standards used by the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary for the purpose of ensuring that the standards— (A) are consistent with section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended by section 523 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 756), which requires gender-neutral occupational standards, requiring performance outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed; (B) accurately predict performance of actual, regular, and recurring duties of a military occupation; and (C) are applied equitably to measure individual capabilities. (2) Role of independent research entity To comply with paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments shall work with an independent research entity identified by the Secretaries. (b) Infantry Training Courses Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives with a briefing on the Marine Corps research involving female members of the Marine Corps who volunteer for the Infantry Officers Course (IOC), the enlisted infantry training course (ITB), and the Ground Combat Element Experimental Task-Force (GCEXTF) for the purpose of— (1) determining what metrics the Marine Corps used to develop the research requirements and elements for the Marine Corps Expanded Entry-Level Training Research; (2) indicating what is being evaluated during these research studies, along with how long both research studies will last; and (3) identifying how data gathered during the research studies will be used to open infantry and other closed occupations. (c) Female personal protection gear The Secretary of Defense shall direct each Secretary of a military department to take immediate steps to ensure that properly designed and fitted combat equipment is available and distributed to female members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. (d) Review of outreach and recruitment efforts focused on officers (1) Review required The Comptroller General of United States shall conduct a review of Services’ Outreach and Recruitment Efforts gauged toward women representation in the officer corps. (2) Elements of Review In conducting the review under this subsection, the Comptroller General shall— (A) identify and evaluate current initiatives the Armed Forces are using to increase accession of women into the officer corps; (B) identify new recruiting efforts to increase accessions of women into the officer corps specifically at the military service academies, Officer Candidate Schools, Officer Training Schools, the Academy of Military Science, and Reserve Officer Training Corps; and (C) identify efforts, resources, and funding required to increase military service academy accessions by women by an additional 20 percent. (3) Submission of results Not later than April 1, 2015, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the review under this subsection. D Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Prevention and Response 531. Improved Department of Defense information reporting and collection of domestic violence incidents involving members of the Armed Forces (a) Data reporting and collection improvements Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in the reporting of information on incidents of domestic violence involving members of the Armed Forces for inclusion in the Department of Defense database on domestic violence incidents required by section 1562 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure that the database provides an accurate count of domestic violence incidents and any consequent disciplinary action. (b) Conforming amendment Section 543(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended by striking paragraph (1). 532. Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding use of mental health records by defense during preliminary hearing and court-martial proceedings (a) Review required The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the judicial proceedings panel, shall conduct a review and assessment of— (1) the impact of the use of mental health records by the defense during the preliminary hearing conducted under section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and during court-martial proceedings; and (2) the use of mental health records in civilian criminal legal proceedings in order to identify any significant discrepancies between the two legal systems. (b) Submission of results The judicial proceedings panel shall include the results of the review and assessment in one of the reports required by section 576(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. 533. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and related military justice enhancements to military service academies The Secretary of the military department concerned and, in the case of the Coast Guard Academy, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, the Air Force Academy, and the Coast Guard Academy. 534. Consultation with victims of sexual assault regarding victims’ preference for prosecution of offense by court-martial or civilian court (a) Legal consultation between Special Victims’ Counsel and victim of sexual assault Subsection (b) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6): (6) Legal consultation regarding the advantages and disadvantages of prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense by court-martial or by a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense before the victim expresses a preference as to the prosecution authority pursuant to the process required by subsection (e)(3). . (b) Process to discern victim preference Subsection (e) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The Secretary concerned shall establish a process to ensure consultation with a victim of an alleged sex-related offense that occurs in the United States to discern the victim's preference regarding prosecution authority, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted. . 535. Enforcement of crime victims’ rights related to protections afforded by certain Military Rules of Evidence Section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals (1) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a court-martial ruling violates the victim’s rights afforded by a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the Military Rule of Evidence. The Court of Criminal Appeals may issue the writ on the order of a single judge and shall take up and decide the petition within 72 hours after the petition has been filed. (2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections afforded by the following: (A) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the psychotherapist-patient privilege. (B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the admission of evidence regarding a victim's sexual background. (3) Court-martial proceedings may not be stayed or subject to a continuance of more than five days for purposes of enforcing this subsection. If the Court of Criminal Appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion. . 536. Minimum confinement period required for conviction of certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces (a) Mandatory Punishments Section 856(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking at a minimum and all that follows through the period at the end of the paragraph and inserting the following: at a minimum except as provided for in section 860 of this title (article 60)— (A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and (B) confinement for two years. . (b) Effective date Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a), shall apply to offenses specified in paragraph (2) of such section committed on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 537. Modification of Military Rules of Evidence relating to admissibility of general military character toward probability of innocence (a) Modification generally The Secretary of Defense shall modify the Military Rules of Evidence to clarify that the general military character of an accused is not admissible for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of the accused, except when evidence of a trait of the military character of an accused is relevant to an element of an offense for which the accused has been charged. (b) Revision of Rule 404(a) by Operation of Law Effective on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence does not authorize the admissibility of evidence regarding the good military character of an accused in the findings phase of courts-martial, except in the instance of the following military-specific offenses: (1) Article 84 effecting unlawful enlistment, appointment, separation. (2) Article 85 desertion. (3) Article 86 absent without leave. (4) Article 87 missing movement. (5) Article 88 contempt towards officials. (6) Article 89 disrespect toward superior commissioned officer. (7) Article 90 assaulting, willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer. (8) Article 91 insubordinate conduct toward warrant, noncommissioned, petty officer. (9) Article 92 failure to obey order or regulation. (10) Article 93 cruelty and maltreatment of subordinates. (11) Article 94 mutiny and sedition. (12) Article 95 resisting apprehension, flight, breach of arrest, escape. (13) Article 96 releasing a prisoner without proper authority. (14) Article 97 unlawful detention. (15) Article 98 noncompliance with procedural rules. (16) Article 99 misbehavior before enemy. (17) Article 100 subordinate compelling surrender. (18) Article 101 improper use of countersign. (19) Article 102 forcing safeguard. (20) Article 103 captured, abandoned property. (21) Article 104 aiding the enemy. (22) Article 105 misconduct as prisoner. (23) Article 106a espionage. (24) Article 107 false official statements. (25) Article 108 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of military property. (26) Article 109 loss, damage, destruction, disposition of property other than military property of the United States. (27) Article 110 improper hazarding of vessel. (28) Article 111 drunk or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel. (29) Article 112 wrongful use, possession, manufacture or introduction of controlled substance. (30) Article 113 misbehavior of sentinel or lookout. (31) Article 114 dueling. (32) Article 115 malingering. (33) Article 116 riot. (34) Article 117 provoking, speech, gestures. (35) Article 133 conduct unbecoming an officer. (36) Article 134 general article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. (37) Attempts, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit such offenses. 538. Confidential review of characterization of terms of discharge of members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual offenses (a) Confidential appeal process through boards for correction of military records The Secretaries of the military departments shall each establish a confidential process by which an individual who was the victim of a sex-related offense during service in the Armed Forces may appeal, through boards for the correction of military records of the military department concerned, the terms or characterization of the discharge or separation of the individual from the Armed Forces on the grounds that the terms or characterization were adversely affected by the individual being the victim of such an offense. (b) Consideration of individual experiences in connection with offenses In deciding whether to modify the terms or characterization of an individual's discharge or separation pursuant to the process required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct boards for the correction of military records to give due consideration to— (1) the psychological and physical aspects of the individual’s experience in connection with the sex-related offense; and (2) what bearing such experience may have had on the circumstances surrounding the individual's discharge or separation from the Armed Forces. (c) Preservation of confidentiality Documents considered and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by subsection (a) shall not be made available to the public, except with the consent of the individual concerned. (d) Sex-related offense defined In this section, the term sex-related offense means any of the following: (1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of title 10, United States Code (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 539. Consistent application of rules of privilege afforded under the Military Rules of Evidence (a) Elimination of exception to psychotherapist-patient privilege Effective on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, the exception granted by subparagraph (d)(8) of Military Rule of Evidence 513 to the privilege afforded to the patient of a psychotherapist to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, a confidential communication made between the patient and a psychotherapist or an assistant to the psychotherapist in a case arising under the Uniform Code of Military Justice shall be deemed to no longer apply or exist as a matter of law. (b) Conforming amendment required As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice of the Department of Defense shall amend Military Rule of Evidence 513 to reflect the elimination of the exception referred to in subsection (a) pursuant to such subsection. E Military Family Readiness 545. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to transitional compensation for dependents of members separated for dependent abuse Section 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking as of the date on which the individual described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty and inserting as of the date on which the separation action is initiated by a commander of the individual described in subsection (b). 546. Improved consistency in data collection and reporting in Armed Forces suicide prevention efforts (a) Policy for standard suicide data collection, reporting, and assessment The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy for the development of a standard method for collecting, reporting, and assessing suicide data and suicide-attempt data involving members of the Armed Forces, including reserve components thereof, and their dependents in order to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of— (1) the suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note); and (2) the suicide prevention and resilience program for the National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 10219 of title 10, United States Code. (b) Submission of policy and congressional briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the policy developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. At the request of the committees, the Secretary also shall brief such committees on the policy and the implementation status of the standardized suicide data collection, reporting and assessment method. (c) Consultation and Implementation In the case of the suicide prevention and resilience program for the National Guard and Reserves— (1) the Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau; and (2) the adjutants general of the States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands shall implement the policy within 180 days after the date of the submission of the policy under subsection (b). (d) Dependent defined In this section, the term dependent, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code, except that, in the case of a parent or parent-in-law of the member, the income requirements of subparagraph (E) of such section do not apply. 547. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces (a) Child custody protection Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 208. Child custody protection (a) Restriction on temporary custody order If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall require that, upon the return of the servicemember from deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be subject to subsection (b). (b) Limitation on consideration of member’s deployment in determination of Child’s Best Interest If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child. (c) No federal jurisdiction or right of action or removal Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal. (d) Preemption In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard. (e) Deployment Defined In this section, the term deployment means the movement or mobilization of a servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or permanent official orders— (1) that are designated as unaccompanied; (2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or (3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family members to that location. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title II the following new item: 208. Child custody protection. . F Education and Training Opportunities 551. Authorized duration of foreign and cultural exchange activities at military service academies (a) United States Military academy Section 4345a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking two weeks and inserting four weeks. (b) Naval academy Section 6957b(a) of such title is amended by striking two weeks and inserting four weeks. (c) Air force academy Section 9345a(a) of such title is amended by striking two weeks and inserting four weeks. 552. Pilot program to assist members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment (a) Program required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services to eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) for the purposes of— (1) assisting such members in obtaining post-service employment; and (2) reducing the amount of Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating pays into the Unemployment Trust Fund. (b) Eligible members Employment services provided under the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who are being separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty. (c) Evaluation of use of civilian employment staffing agencies (1) Program described The Secretary of Defense shall execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment. (2) Program management The program required by this subsection shall be managed by an civilian organization (in this section referred to as the program manager) whose principal members have experience— (A) administering pay-for-performance programs; and (B) within the employment staffing industry. (3) Exclusion The program manager may not be a staffing agency. (d) Eligible civilian employment staffing agencies The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the program manager shall establish the eligibility requirements to be used by the program manager for the selection of civilian employment staffing agencies to participate in the program. (e) Payment of staffing agency fees To encourage employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces under the program, the program manager shall pay a participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the member's hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be made after the member has been employed and paid by the private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the program manager. The staffing agency shall be paid on a weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to exceed a total of 800 hours. (f) Oversight requirements In conducting the program, the Secretary of Defense shall establish— (1) program monitoring standards; and (2) reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the month, and the number of members who remained employed with the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of employment. (g) Limitation on total program obligations The total amount obligated by the Secretary of Defense for the program may not exceed $35,000,000 during a fiscal year. (h) Reporting requirements (1) Report Required Not later than January 15, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the results of the program, particularly whether the program achieved the purposes specified in subsection (a). (2) Comparison with other programs The report shall include a comparison of the results of the program conducted under this section and the results of other employment assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost to the Department per member. (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (i) Duration of authority The authority of the Secretary of Defense to carry out programs under this section expires on September 30, 2018. G Defense Dependents’ Education 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b). (b) Local educational agency defined In this section, the term local educational agency has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 562. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in Department of Defense overseas dependents’ school system Section 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is amended by inserting before the comma at the end the following: or, in the case of a teaching position that involves instruction in the host-nation language, a local national when a citizen of the United States is not reasonably available to provide such instruction. 563. Expansion of functions of the Advisory Council on Dependents’ Education to include domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools (a) Expansion of functions Subsection (c) of section 1411 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 929) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting , and of the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code, after of the defense dependents’ education system; and (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting and in the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system before the comma at the end. (b) Membership of council Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such section is amended— (1) by inserting and the domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code after the defense dependents’ education system; and (2) by inserting either before such system. 564. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit organizations that provide services to improve the academic achievement of military dependent students, including those nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic responsibility of military dependent students and their understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure to the operations of the Federal Government. 565. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012 Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking 2-year and inserting 4-year; and (B) by inserting before the period at the end the following, , except that amendment made by subsection (b) to subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) shall be effective for a 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; and (2) in paragraph (4)— (A) by striking The amendments and inserting the following: (A) In general The amendments ; (B) by inserting and subparagraph (B) of this paragraph after subsection (b); (C) by striking 2-year and inserting 4-year; (D) by inserting and such subparagraph after such subsection each place it appears; and (E) by adding at the end the following: (B) Special rule For the period beginning January 3, 2015, and ending January 2, 2017, subparagraph (B) of section 8002(b)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(b)(3)(B)) is amended to read as follows: (B) Special rule In the case of Federal property eligible under this section that is within the boundaries of two or more local educational agencies that are eligible under this section, any of such agencies may ask the Secretary to calculate (and the Secretary shall calculate) the taxable value of the eligible Federal property that is within its boundaries by— (i) first calculating the per-acre value of the eligible Federal property separately for each eligible local educational agency that shares the Federal property, as provided in subparagraph (A)(ii); (ii) then averaging the resulting per-acre values of the eligible Federal property from each eligible local educational agency that shares the Federal property; and (iii) then applying the average per-acre value to determine the total taxable value of the eligible Federal property under subparagraph (A)(iii) for the requesting local educational agency. . . H Decorations and Awards 571. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who were killed or wounded in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization (a) Purple Heart (1) Award (A) In general Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the following new section: 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks inspired or motivated by foreign terrorist organizations (a) In general For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States. (b) Covered members A member described in this subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or wounded in an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due to such member's status as a member of the armed forces, unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct of the member. (c) Foreign terrorist organization defined In this section, the term foreign terrorist organization means an entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). . (B) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1129 the following new item: 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks inspired or motivated by foreign terrorist organizations. . (2) Retroactive effective date and application (A) Effective date The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of September 11, 2001. (B) Review of certain previous incidents The Secretaries concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding resulting an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added). (C) Actions following review If the death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting from an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate action under such section to award the Purple Heart to the member. (D) Secretary concerned defined In this paragraph, the term Secretary concerned has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code. (b) Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom (1) Review of the November 5, 2009, attack at Fort Hood, Texas If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack inspired or motivated by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom. (2) Award If the Secretary of Defense determines under paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the employee or contractor. 572. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge (a) Authority To award The Secretary of the Army may award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of the Army Letter 600–05–1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat during which the person personally engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary determines that the person has not been previously recognized in an appropriate manner for such participation. (b) Procurement of badge The Secretary of the Army may make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to carry out this section. 573. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report describing the Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard to the case. I Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements 581. Secretary of Defense review and report on prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces (a) Review Required The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, shall conduct a review of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents. (b) Consultation In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and consider the recommendations of, the Office of Suicide Prevention, the Secretaries of the military departments, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the United States Special Operations Command regarding the feasibility of implementing, for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, particular elements of the Department of Defense suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). (c) Elements of review The review conducted under subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of each of the following: (1) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command policy guidelines on the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents. (2) Current and direct Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command suicide prevention programs and activities for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including programs provided by the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide Prevention and programs supporting family members. (3) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command strategies to reduce suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including the cost of such strategies across the future years defense program. (4) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command standards of care for suicide prevention among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including training standards for behavioral health care providers to ensure that such providers receive training on clinical best practices and evidence-based treatments as information on such practices and treatments becomes available. (5) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention efforts for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents into the delivery of primary care for such members and dependents. (6) The standards for responding to attempted or completed suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including guidance and training to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or completed suicide within their units. (7) The standards regarding data collection for individual members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including related factors such as domestic violence and child abuse. (8) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide prevention. (9) The need to differentiate members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents from members of conventional forces and their dependents in the development and delivery of the Department of Defense suicide prevention program. (10) Such other matters as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate in connection with the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents. (d) Submission of report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review conducted under subsection (a). 582. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of sexual assault (a) Review required The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct a review— (1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after making an unrestricted report of sexual assault; (2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each such separation, including— (A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted report of sexual assault; and (B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and (3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine whether the separation was carried out in compliance with Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and policies. (b) Submission of results and recommendations Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the results of the review conducted under subsection (a), including such recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of Defense considers necessary. 583. Comptroller General report regarding management of personnel records of members of the National Guard (a) Report required Not later than April 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the management of personnel records of members of the National Guard. (b) Elements of report In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall consider, at a minimum, the following: (1) The appropriate Federal role and responsibility in the management of the records of National Guard members. (2) The extent to which selected States have digitized the records of National Guard members. (3) The extent to which those States and Federal agencies have entered into agreements to share the digitized records. (4) The extent to which Federal agencies face any constraints in their ability to effectively manage National Guard records. 584. Study on gender integration in defense operation planning and execution (a) Study required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall conduct a study concerning the integration of gender into the planning and execution of foreign operations of the Armed Forces at all levels. (b) Elements of study In conducting the study under subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall— (1) identify those elements of defense doctrine, if any, that should be revised to address attention to women and gender; (2) evaluate the need for a gender advisor training program, including the length of training, proposed curriculum, and location of training; (3) determine how to best equip military leadership to integrate attention to women and gender across all lines of effort; (4) determine the extent to which personnel qualified to advise on women and gender are available within the Department of Defense, including development of a billet description for gender advisors; and (5) evaluate where to assign gender advisors within operational commands from the strategic to tactical levels, with particular attention paid to assigning advisors to combatant commanders and service chiefs. (c) Submission of results Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 585. Deadline for submission of report containing results of review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to section 1735 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 976). J Other Matters 591. Inspection of outpatient residential facilities occupied by recovering service members Section 1662(a) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking inspected on a semiannual basis for the first two years after the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter and inserting inspected at least once every two years. 592. Working Group on Integrated Disability Evaluation System (a) Establishment There is established within the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee under section 320 of title 38, United States Code, a Working Group (in this section referred to as the Working Group) to evaluate and reform the Integrated Disability Evaluation System of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Working Group shall be established under the Disability Evaluation System Working Group of the Joint Executive Committee. (b) Pilot program (1) In general The Working Group shall carry out a pilot program that will co-locate the services and personnel of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to create an integrated model that continues the improvement of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System process through— (A) increased process efficiencies, as determined by the Working Group; (B) the creation of a standardized form set described in subsection (c)(3); (C) the elimination of redundancies; (D) the improvement of existing process timelines of the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; (E) increased service member satisfaction; and (F) the establishment of an information technology bridging solution described in subsection (c)(4). (2) Duration The pilot program under paragraph (1) shall be carried for a period not exceeding three years. (c) Goals of pilot program In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall ensure the following: (1) The period beginning on the date on which an eligible member begins to participate in the pilot program and ending on the date on which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the member is not more than 295 days. (2) Employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs who carry out the pilot program are co-located in the same facility, to the extent practicable, to determine the efficiencies provided by locating services of the Departments in the same location. (3) The elimination of redundant forms by creating and using a standardized electronic form set with respect to information that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs both require for an eligible member participating in the pilot program. (4) The establishment of an information technology bridging solution between the existing E-benefits program and the MYIDES dashboard to ensure that both such programs contain the information that is added to the claim of an eligible member participating in the pilot program. (5) Using the solution established under paragraph (4), eligible members participating in the pilot program are able to use the existing identification number of the member used by the Department of Defense to— (A) automatically track the status of the claim of the member, including with respect to the office of the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs that is responsible for the evaluation as of the date of accessing such solution; and (B) be informed of the estimated timeline of the evaluation of the claim. (6) Using the solution established under paragraph (4), the Working Group and the Secretaries may— (A) identify the office and employee of the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs who are responsible for the evaluation of a claim at any given time; and (B) track individual employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs with respect to statistics measuring quality and accuracy at the case level. (7) Eligible members who participate in the pilot program have the opportunity to use an exit survey (approved by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs) that informs the Working Group of the satisfaction of the member with respect to the pilot program. (d) Eligible members A member of the Armed Forces who is being separated or retired from the Armed Forces for disability under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, is eligible to participate in the pilot program under subsection (b) if— (1) the member is referred to the Integrated Disability Evaluation System beginning on or after the date of the commencement of the pilot program by the specific medical authority of a military department; and (2) the evaluation of the member under the Integrated Disability Evaluation System is processed at the disability rating activity site in Providence, Rhode Island. (e) Timeline By not later than 120 days after the date of the first meeting of the Working Group, the Working Group shall— (1) establish the pilot program under subsection (b); and (2) establish standards for the products, software, personnel, approved standardized electronic form set described in subsection (c)(3), and other matters required to carry out the pilot program; and (3) identify the security required for the information systems of the pilot program. (f) Location The pilot program established under subsection (b) shall be located at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. (g) Cooperation (1) Assignment The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall assign employees of both Departments to the location specified in subsection (f) during the period in which the pilot program is carried out. (2) Prioritization As determined appropriate by the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee, employees of the Veterans Benefits Administration who rate claims for disability may be assigned to the pilot program under subsection (b) in a sufficient number to ensure that claims for disability that are approved are processed— (A) for proposed rating decision not later than 15 days after such approval; and (B) for notification of benefits and authorization of award not later than 30 days after separation from the Armed Forces. (h) Treatment in current IDES If an eligible member who is participating in the pilot program under subsection (b) elects to instead participate in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall evaluate the eligible member under the Integrated Disability Evaluation System by recognizing the date of the original claim of the member and without any penalty with respect to the priority of the member in such system. (i) Reports (1) Quarterly reports During each 90-day period during the period in which the Working Group carries out the pilot program under subsection (b), the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee a report on the status of the pilot program. The report shall include— (A) the average number of days that an eligible member participates in the pilot program before the Secretary of Veterans Affairs determines the disability rating of the member; (B) the extent to which forms have been eliminated pursuant to subsection (c)(3); (C) the extent to which the information technology bridging solution established pursuant to subsection (c)(4) has improved information sharing between the Departments; (D) the results of exit surveys described in subsection (c)(7); (E) the extent to which employees of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have been co-located in the same facility under the pilot program; and (F) the determination of the Working Group, based on data collected during the course of the pilot program, with respect to the feasibility of increasing the efficiency of the program to decrease the number of days of the goal described in subsection (c)(1). (2) Submission of quarterly reports Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Working Group submits a report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees such report. (3) Final report Not later than 180 days after the date on which the pilot program under subsection (b) is completed, the Working Group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee a report on the pilot program, including an analysis of the pilot program and any recommendations regarding whether the pilot program should be expanded. (4) Submission of final report Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Working Group submits the report under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees such report. (j) Membership (1) Number and appointment The Working Group shall be composed of 15 members appointed by the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee from among individuals who have subject matter expertise or other relevant experience in government, the private sector, or academia regarding— (A) health care; (B) medical records; (C) logistics; (D) information technology; or (E) other relevant subjects. (2) Disqualification An individual may not be appointed to the Working Group if the individual has served on the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee or any working group thereof. (3) Employees of Departments Not more than a total of four individuals who are employed by either the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be appointed to the Working Group to ensure that the efficiencies and best practices of the pilot program do not violate the policies of the Departments. Such an individual who is appointed may not serve as chairman of the Working Group or serve in any other supervisory or leadership role. (4) Advisors The Working Group shall seek advice from experts from nongovernmental organizations (including veterans service organizations, survivors of members of the Armed Forces or veterans, and military organizations), the Internet technology industry, private sector hospital administrators, and other entities the Working Group determines appropriate. (5) Chairman Except as provided by paragraph (3), the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee shall designate a member of the Working Group to serve as chairman of the Working Group. (6) Period of Appointment Members of the Working Group shall be appointed for the life of the Working Group. A vacancy shall not affect its powers. (7) Vacancy A vacancy on the Working Group shall be filled in the manner in which the original appointment was made. (8) Appointment deadline The appointment of members of the Working Group established in this section shall be made not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (9) Compensation of Members Each member of the Working Group who is not an officer or employee of the United States shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Working Group. All members of the Working Group who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States. (k) Meetings (1) Initial meeting The Working Group shall hold its first meeting not later than 15 days after the date on which a majority of the members are appointed. (2) Minimum number of meetings The Working Group shall meet not less than twice each year regarding the pilot program under subsection (b), including the progress, status, implementation, and execution of the pilot program. (l) Termination of Working Group The Working Group shall terminate on the date on which the Working Group submits the report under subsection (i)(3). (m) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (A) The Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate. (B) The Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate. (2) The term Integrated Disability Evaluation System means the disability evaluation system used jointly by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 593. Sense of Congress regarding fulfilling promise to leave no member of the Armed Forces unaccounted in Afghanistan (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The United States is a country of great honor and integrity. (2) The United States has made a sacred promise to members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas in defense of the United States that their sacrifice and service will never be forgotten. (3) The United States can never thank the proud members of the Armed Forces enough for their sacrifice and service on behalf of the United States. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) abandoning the search efforts for members of the Armed Forces who are missing or captured in the line of duty now or in the future is unacceptable; (2) the United States has a responsibility to keep the promises made to members of the Armed Forces deployed overseas in defense of the United States, including the promise of the United States Soldier’s Creed and the Warrior Ethos, which state that I will never leave a fallen comrade; and (3) while the United States continues to transition leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan to the people of Afghanistan, the United States must continue to fulfill these important promises to any member of the Armed Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of service in Afghanistan now or in the future. VI Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits A Pay and Allowances 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015. 602. No fiscal year 2015 increase in basic pay for general and flag officers Section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable for commissioned officers in the uniformed services in pay grades O–7 through O–10 during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014. B Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus. (2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus. (3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units. (4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service. (5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance. (8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals (a) Title 10 authorities The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (b) Title 37 authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists. (2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. (3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists. (4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. (5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers. (6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers. (7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties. (8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service. (2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus. (3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers. (4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (6) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. (7) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (8) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (9) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (10) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015: (1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus. (2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. (3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members. (4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. (5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. (6) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills. (7) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. (8) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between branches of the Armed Forces. (9) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates. C Travel and Transportation 621. Authority to enter into contracts for the provision of relocation services The Secretary of Defense may authorize the commander of a military base to enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the provision of relocation services to members of the Armed Forces. D Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 631. Authority of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities to enter into contracts with other Federal agencies and instrumentalities to provide and obtain certain goods and services Section 2492 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Federal department, agency, or instrumentality and all that follows through the period at the end of the section and inserting the following: Federal department, agency, or instrumentality— (1) to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the exchange system or that morale, welfare, and recreation system; or (2) to provide or obtain food services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the dining facilities on military installations offering food services to members of the armed forces. . 632. Review of management, food, and pricing options for defense commissary system (a) Review required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of— (1) using variable pricing in commissary stores to reduce the expenditure of appropriated funds to operate the defense commissary system; (2) implementing a program to make available more private label products in commissary stores; (3) converting the defense commissary system to a nonappropriated fund instrumentality, and (4) eliminating or at least reducing second-destination funding. (b) Additional elements of review The review required by this section also shall consider the following: (1) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, that would result from displacing current value and name-brand products with private-label products. (2) The sensitivity of commissary patrons to pricing changes. (3) The feasibility of generating net revenue from pricing and stock assortment changes. (4) The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a national and regional basis. (5) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on industry support; such as vendor stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities and programs. (6) The ability of the current commissary management and information technology systems to accommodate changes to the existing pricing and management structure. (7) The product category management systems and expertise of the Defense Commissary Agency. (8) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on military exchanges and other morale, welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed Forces. (9) The identification of management and legislative changes that would be required in connection with changes to the defense commissary system. (10) An estimate of the time required to implement recommended changes to the current pricing and management model of the defense commissary system. (c) Submission Not later than February 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review required by this section. 633. Restriction on implementing any new Department of Defense policy to limit, restrict, or ban the sale of certain items on military installations The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may not take any action to implement any new policy that would limit, restrict, or ban the sale of any legal consumer product category sold as of January 1, 2014, in the defense commissary system or exchange stores system on any military installation, domestically or overseas, or on any Department of Defense vessel at sea. E Other Matters 641. Anonymous survey of members of the Armed Forces regarding their preferences for military pay and benefits (a) Survey required The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces regarding military pay and benefits for the purpose of soliciting information on the following: (1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the following forms of compensation relative to one another: (A) Basic pay. (B) Allowances for housing and subsistence. (C) Bonuses and special pays. (D) Dependent healthcare benefits. (E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old. (F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees. (G) Retirement pay. (2) How the members value different levels of pay or benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles on the value of benefits. (3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (4) How information collected pursuant to a previous paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and such other factors as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (b) Submission of results Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report containing the results of the survey, including both the analyses and the raw data collected. VII Health Care Provisions A TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces (a) In general Section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: (B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member is deployed. ; and (2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)— (A) in clause (i), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and (C) by inserting after clause (i) the following: (ii) by personnel in deployed units whose responsibilities include providing unit health care services if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and . (b) Conforming amendment Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and (C) and inserting subparagraph (C) and (D). 702. Clarification of provision of food to former members and dependents not receiving inpatient care in military medical treatment facilities Section 1078b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking A member each place it appears and inserting A member or former member; and (2) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by striking member or dependent and inserting member, former member, or dependent. B Health Care Administration 711. Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking Secretary of Defense and inserting Secretary concerned; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking Secretary shall and inserting Secretary concerned shall; (B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting if the Secretary establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense before the semicolon; and (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting or the military department concerned after the Department of Defense; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Secretary concerned defined In this section, the term Secretary concerned means— (1) the Secretary of a military department; or (2) the Secretary of Defense. . 712. Surveys on continued viability of TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra Section 711(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (1) by striking on a biennial basis; and (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: paragraph (1) during 2017 and 2020, and at such others times as requested by such committees or as the Comptroller General determines appropriate. 713. Limitation on transfer or elimination of graduate medical education billets The Secretary of Defense may not transfer or eliminate a graduate medical education billet from the military medical treatment facility to which the billet is assigned as of the date of the enactment of this Act unless the Secretary— (1) conducts a Department-wide review of the implementation of the plan required by section 731 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) that is based on not less than two years of carrying out such implementation; (2) conducts an examination of the most successful incentives for recruiting and retaining medical professionals to participate in the graduate medical education programs of the military departments; (3) determines the assignment of such billets based on the review and examination conducted under paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and (4) after the Secretary makes the determination under paragraph (3), certifies to the congressional defense committees that any proposed transfer or elimination of such billets— (A) meets the needs of the military departments and the patient population; and (B) takes into account the assignment interests of the members of the Armed Forces who are participating (or who will participate) in the graduate medical education programs of the military departments. 714. Review of military health system modernization study (a) Limitation (1) In General The Secretary of Defense may not restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility until a 120-day period has elapsed following the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(3). (2) Report The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: (A) During the period from 2001 to 2012, for each military medical treatment facility considered under the modernization study directed by the Resource Management Decision of the Department of Defense numbered MP–D–01— (i) the average daily inpatient census; (ii) the average inpatient capacity; (iii) the top five inpatient admission diagnoses; (iv) each medical specialty available; (v) the average daily percent of staffing available for each medical specialty; (vi) the beneficiary population within the catchment area; (vii) the budgeted funding level; (viii) whether the facility has a helipad capable of receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military installation served; (ix) a determination of whether the civilian hospital system in which the facility resides is a Federally-designated underserved medical community and the effect on such community from any reduction in staff or functions or downgrade of the facility; (x) if the facility serves a training center, a determination, made in consultation with the appropriate training directorate, training and doctrine command, and forces command of each military department, of the risk with respect to high tempo, live-fire military operations, and the potential for a mass casualty event if the facility is downgraded to a clinic or reduced in personnel or capabilities; (xi) a site assessment by TRICARE to assess the network capabilities of TRICARE providers in the local area; (xii) the inpatient mental health availability; and (xiii) the average annual inpatient care directed to civilian medical facilities. (B) For each military medical treatment facility considered under such modernization study— (i) the civilian capacity by medical specialty in each catchment area; (ii) the distance in miles to the nearest civilian emergency care department; (iii) the distance in miles to the closest civilian inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the facility is designated a sole community hospital; (iv) the availability of ambulance service on the military installation and the distance in miles to the nearest civilian ambulance service, including the average response time to the military installation; (v) an estimate of the cost to restructure or realign the military medical treatment facility, including with respect to bed closures and civilian personnel reductions; and (vi) if the military medical treatment facility is restructured or realigned, an estimate of— (I) the number of civilian personnel reductions, listed by series; (II) the number of local support contracts terminated; and (III) the increased cost of purchased care. (C) The results of the study with respect to the recommendations of the Secretary to restructure or realign military medical treatment facilities. (b) Comptroller General Review (1) Review The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the report under subsection (a)(2). (2) Elements The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense in conducting the study. (B) An assessment of the adequacy of the data used by the Secretary with respect to such study. (3) Report Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (a)(2), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under paragraph (1). C Reports and Other Matters 721. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573) is amended by striking September 30, 2015 and inserting September 30, 2016. 722. Designation and responsibilities of senior medical advisor for Armed Forces Retirement Home (a) Designation of senior medical advisor Subsection (a) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity and inserting Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity both places it appears and inserting Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency. (b) Clarification of responsibilities and duties of senior medical advisor Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking health care standards of the Department of Veterans Affairs and inserting nationally recognized health care standards and requirements. 723. Research regarding Alzheimer's disease The Secretary of Defense may carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to Alzheimer’s disease. 724. Acquisition strategy for health care professional staffing services (a) Acquisition strategy (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall develop and carry out an acquisition strategy with respect to entering into contracts for the services of health care professional staff at military medical treatment facilities. (2) Elements The acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Identification of the responsibilities of the military departments and elements of the Department of Defense in carrying out such strategy. (B) Methods to analyze, using reliable and detailed data covering the entire Department, the amount of funds expended on contracts for the services of health care professional staff. (C) Methods to identify opportunities to consolidate requirements for such services and reduce cost. (D) Methods to measure cost savings that are realized by using such contracts instead of purchased care. (E) Metrics to determine the effectiveness of such strategy. (b) Report Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of implementing the acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including how each element under subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2) of such subsection are being carried out. 725. Pilot program on medication therapy management under TRICARE program (a) Establishment In accordance with section 1092 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and desirability of including medication therapy management as part of the TRICARE program. (b) Elements of pilot program In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the following: (1) Patients who participate in the pilot program are patients who— (A) have more than one chronic condition; and (B) are prescribed more than one medication. (2) Medication therapy management services provided under the pilot program are focused on improving patient use and outcomes of prescription medications. (3) The design of the pilot considers best commercial practices in providing medication therapy management services, including practices under the prescription drug program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–101 et seq.). (4) The pilot program includes methods to measure the effect of medication therapy management services on— (A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; and (B) the costs of health care. (c) Locations (1) Selection The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) in not less than three locations. (2) First location criteria Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following criteria: (A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical treatment facility. (B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such location generally receive primary care services from health care providers at such facility. (3) Second location criteria Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following criteria: (A) The location is a pharmacy at a military medical treatment facility. (B) The patients participating in the pilot program at such location generally do not receive primary care services from health care providers at such facility. (4) Third location criterion Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall be a pharmacy located at a location other than a military medical treatment facility. (d) Duration The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period determined appropriate by the Secretary that is not less than two years. (e) Report Not later than 30 months after the date on which the Secretary commences the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program that includes— (1) information on the effect of medication therapy management services on— (A) patient use and outcomes of prescription medications; and (B) the costs of health care; (2) the recommendations of the Secretary with respect to incorporating medication therapy management into the TRICARE program; and (3) such other information as the Secretary determines appropriate. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term medication therapy management means professional services provided by qualified pharmacists to patients to improve the effective use and outcomes of prescription medications provided to the patients. (2) The term TRICARE program has the meaning given that term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code. 726. Report on reduction of Prime Service Areas (a) In general Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1816), as amended by section 701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Additional report (1) Implementation Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B). (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Details regarding the impact to affected eligible beneficiaries with respect to the reduction of the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B), including, with respect to each State— (i) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as of the date of the report, are enrolled in TRICARE Standard; (ii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as of the date of the report; changed residences to remain eligible for TRICARE Prime in a new region; and (iii) the number of affected eligible beneficiaries who, as of the date of the report, have made an election described in subsection (c)(1). (B) The estimated increase in annual costs per each affected eligible beneficiary counted under subparagraph (A) as compared to the estimated annual costs if a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A) did not affect the eligibility of the beneficiary for TRICARE Prime. (C) A description of the efforts of the Secretary to assess— (i) the impact on access to health care for affected eligible beneficiaries; and (ii) the satisfaction of such beneficiaries with respect to access to health care under TRICARE Standard. (D) A description of the estimated cost savings realized by reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B). . (b) Conforming amendment Subsection (b)(3)(A) of such section is amended by striking subsection (c)(1)(B) and inserting subsection (d)(1)(B). 727. Comptroller General report on transition of care for post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury (a) Report Not later than April 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees and Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report that assesses the transition of care for post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The programs, policies, and regulations that affect the transition of care, particularly with respect to individuals who are taking or have been prescribed antidepressants, stimulants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytic, depressants, or hallucinogens. (2) Upon transitioning to care furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the extent to which the pharmaceutical treatment plan of an individual changes, and the factors determining such changes. (3) The extent to which the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs have worked together to identify and apply best pharmaceutical treatment practices. (4) A description of the off-formulary waiver process of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the extent to which the process is applied efficiently at the treatment level. (5) The benefits and challenges of combining the formularies across the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. (6) Any other issues that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. (c) Transition of care defined In this section, the term transition of care means the transition of an individual from receiving treatment furnished by the Secretary of Defense to treatment furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 728. Briefing on hospitals in arrears in payments to Department of Defense Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing on the process used by the Defense Health Agency to collect payments from non-Department of Defense hospitals. Such briefing shall include a list of each hospital that is more than 90 days in arrears in payments to the Secretary, including the amount of arrears (by 30-day increments) for each such hospital. VIII Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters A Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations 801. Extension to United States Transportation Command of authorities relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy Section 831(i)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 813) is amended by inserting “United States Transportation Command,” after “United States Southern Command,”. 802. Extension of contract authority for advanced component development or prototype units (a) Extension of termination Subsection (b)(4) of section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking September 30, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2019. (b) Extension of report requirement Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking March 1, 2013 and inserting March 1, 2018. 803. Amendment relating to authority of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype projects Section 845(a)(1) of Public Law 103–160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended by striking weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of weapons or weapon systems in use by the Armed Forces and inserting the following: enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the Armed Forces. 804. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489), as amended by section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 804) is further amended— (1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking or 2014 and inserting 2014, or 2015; (2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking and 2014 and inserting 2014, and 2015; (3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking or 2014 and inserting 2014, or 2015; and (4) in subsection (e), by striking 2014 and inserting 2015. B Industrial Base Matters 811. Three-year extension of and amendments to test program for negotiation of comprehensive small business subcontracting plans (a) Three-year extension Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2017. (b) Additional requirements for comprehensive subcontracting plans Subsection (b) of section 834 of such Act is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (3) and inserting paragraph (4); (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and in that paragraph by striking $5,000,000 and inserting $100,000,000; and (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) Each comprehensive subcontracting plan of a contractor shall require that the contractor report to the Secretary of Defense on a semi-annual basis the following information: (A) The amount of first-tier subcontract dollars awarded during the six-month period covered by the report to covered small business concerns, with the information set forth separately— (i) by North American Industrial Classification System code; (ii) by major defense acquisition program, as defined in section 2430(a) of title 10, United States Code; (iii) by contract, if the contract is for the maintenance, overhaul, repair, servicing, rehabilitation, salvage, modernization, or modification of supplies, systems, or equipment and the total value of the contract, including options, exceeds $100,000,000; and (iv) by military department. (B) The total number of subcontracts active under the test program during the six-month period covered by the report that would have otherwise required a subcontracting plan under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)). (C) Costs incurred in negotiating, complying with, and reporting on comprehensive subcontracting plans. (D) Costs avoided by adoption of a comprehensive subcontracting plan. (E) Any other information required by the Department of Defense to complete the study required by subsection (f). . (c) Additional consequence for failure to make good faith effort to comply (1) Amendments Subsection (d) of section 834 of such Act is amended— (A) by striking Company-wide and inserting Comprehensive in the heading; (B) by striking company-wide and inserting comprehensive subcontracting; and (C) by adding at the end the following: In addition, any such failure shall be a factor considered as part of the evaluation of past performance of an offeror.. (2) Repeal of suspension of subsection (d) Section 402 of Public Law 101–574 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is repealed. (d) Additional report (1) In general Paragraph (1) of section 834(f) of such Act is amended by striking March 1, 1994, and March 1, 2012 and inserting September 30, 2015. (2) Correction of reference to committee Such paragraph is further amended by striking Committees and all that follows through the end of such paragraph and inserting the following: Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate. (e) Additional definitions (1) Covered small business concern Subsection (g) of section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows: (g) Definitions In this section, the term covered small business concern includes each of the following: (1) A small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)); (2) A small business concern owned and controlled by veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(3) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)). (3) A small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(2) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)). (4) A qualified HUBZone small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(p)(5) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)). (5) A small business concern owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as that term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)). (6) A small business concern owned and controlled by women, as that term is defined under section 3(n) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(n)). . (2) Conforming amendment Subsection (a)(1) of section 834 of such Act is amended by striking small business concerns and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and inserting covered small business concerns. 812. Improving opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (a) Small Business definition of small business concern consolidated Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended— (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (2) Small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans The term small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans means a small business concern— (A) (i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and (ii) the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran; or (B) (i) not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans with service-connected disabilities that are permanent and total who are unable to manage the daily business operations of such concern or, in the case of a publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more such veterans; and (ii) is included in the database described in section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (6) Treatment of Businesses After Death of Veteran-Owner (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (C), if the death of a service-disabled veteran causes a small business concern to be less than 51 percent owned by one or more such veterans, the surviving spouse of such veteran who acquires ownership rights in such small business concern shall, for the period described in subparagraph (B), be treated as if the surviving spouse were that veteran for the purpose of maintaining the status of the small business concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. (B) Period described The period referred to in subparagraph (A) is the period beginning on the date on which the service-disabled veteran dies and ending on the earliest of the following dates: (i) The date on which the surviving spouse remarries. (ii) The date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes an ownership interest in the small business concern. (iii) The date that is ten years after the date of the veteran’s death. (C) Application to surviving spouse Subparagraph (A) only applies to a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability if— (i) the veteran had a service-connected disability rated as 100 percent disabling or died as a result of a service-connected disability; and (ii) prior to the death of the veteran and during the period in which the surviving spouse seeks to qualify under this paragraph, the small business concern is included in the database described in section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code. . (b) Veterans Affairs Definition of small business concern consolidated Section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking subsection (h); and (2) in subsection (l)(2), by striking means and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: has the meaning given that term under section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)).. (c) SBA to assume control of verification of ownership and control status of applicants for inclusion in the database of small businesses owned and controlled by service disabled veterans and veterans The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.), as amended by section 815, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section: 49. Vets First program In order to increase opportunities for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans and small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans in the Federal marketplace, not later than 180 days after the effective date of this section, the Administrator shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that transfers control and administration of the program under subsections (e) through (g) of section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, to the Administrator, consistent with the following: (1) Not later than 270 days after completing the memorandum of understanding, the Administrator shall make rules to carry out the memorandum. If the Administrator does not make such rules by such date, the Administrator may not exercise the authority under section 7(a)(25)(A) until such time as those rules are made. (2) The Administrator shall assume authority and responsibility for maintenance and operation of the database and for verifications under the program. Any verifications undertaken by the Administrator shall employ fraud prevention measures at the time of the initial application, through detection and monitoring processes after initial acceptance, by investigating allegations of potential fraud, removing firms that do not quality from the database, and referring cases for prosecution when appropriate. (3) Any appeal by a small business concern, at the time that verification is denied or a contract is awarded, of any determination under the program shall be heard by the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration. (4) (A) The Secretary shall, for a period of 6 years commencing on a date agreed to in the completed memorandum, reimburse to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration any costs incurred by the Administrator for actions undertaken pursuant to the memorandum from fees collected by the Secretary of Veteran Affairs under multiple-award schedule contracts. The Administrator and the Secretary shall endeavor to ensure maximum efficiency in such actions. Any disputes between the Secretary and the Administrator shall be resolved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (B) The Secretary and the Administrator may extend the term of the memorandum of understanding, except for the reimbursement requirement under subparagraph (A). The Secretary and the Administrator may in a separate memorandum of understanding provide for an extension of such reimbursement. (5) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary and the Administrator shall— (A) meet to discuss ways to improve collaboration under the memorandum to increase opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small businesses; and (B) consult with congressionally chartered Veterans Service Organizations to discuss ways to increase opportunities for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small businesses. (6) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary and the Administrator shall report to the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate on the progress made by the Secretary and the Administrator implementing this section. (7) In any meeting required under paragraph (5), the Secretary and the Administrator shall include in the discussion of ways to improve collaboration under the memorandum to increase opportunities for small businesses owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans who are women or minorities and small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans who are women or minorities. . (d) Memorandum of Understanding Section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: (7) Not later than 180 days after the effective date of this paragraph, the Secretary shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration consistent with section 48 of the Small Business Act, which shall specify the manner in which the Secretary shall notify the Administrator as to whether an individual is a veteran and if that veteran has a service-connected disability. . 813. Plan for improving data on bundled and consolidated contracts Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (s) Data quality improvement plan (1) In general Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2016, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, in consultation with the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of the General Services Administration shall develop a plan to improve the quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts in the Federal procurement data system. (2) Plan requirements The plan shall— (A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the Directors of the Offices of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, the senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers in implementing the plan described in paragraph (1) and contributing to the annual report required by subsection (p)(4); (B) make necessary changes to policies and procedures on proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and consolidation, and to training procedures of relevant personnel on proper identification and mitigation of contract bundling and consolidation; (C) establish consequences for failure to properly identify contracts as bundled or consolidated; (D) establish requirements for periodic and statistically valid data verification and validation; and (E) assign clear data verification responsibilities. (3) Committee briefing Once finalized and by not later than 90 days prior to implementation, the plan described in this subsection shall be presented to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate. (4) Implementation Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2017, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall implement the plan described in this subsection. (5) Certification The Administrator shall annually provide to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate certification of the accuracy and completeness of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts. (6) GAO study and report (A) Study Not later than the first day of fiscal year 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall initiate a study on the effectiveness of the plan described in this subsection that shall assess whether contracts were accurately labeled as bundled or consolidated. (B) Contracts evaluated For the purposes of conducting the study described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States— (i) shall evaluate, for work in each of sectors 23, 33, 54, and 56 (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System), not fewer than 100 contracts in each sector; (ii) shall evaluate only those contracts— (I) awarded by an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code; and (II) that have a Base and Exercised Options Value, an Action Obligation, or a Base and All Options Value exceeding $10,000,000; and (iii) shall not evaluate contracts that have used any set aside authority. (C) Report Not later than 12 months after initiating the study required by subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on the results from such study and, if warranted, any recommendations on how to improve the quality of data reported on bundled and consolidated contracts. (7) Definitions In this subsection the following definitions shall apply: (A) Chief Acquisition Officer; senior procurement executive The terms Chief Acquisition Officer and senior procurement executive have the meanings given such terms in section 44 of this Act. (B) Federal procurement data system definitions The terms Base and Exercised Options Value, Action Obligation, Base and All Options Value, and set aside authority have the meanings given such terms by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in the Federal procurement data system on October 1, 2013, or subsequent equivalent terms. . 814. Authority to provide education to small businesses on certain requirements of Arms Export Control Act (a) Assistance at Small Business Development Centers Section 21(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)(1)) is amended by inserting at the end the following: Applicants receiving grants under this section shall also assist small businesses by providing, where appropriate, education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements. . (b) Procurement technical assistance Section 2418 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) An eligible entity assisted by the Department of Defense under this chapter also may furnish education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements. . 815. Prohibition on reverse auctions for covered contracts (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, when used appropriately, reverse auctions may improve the Federal Government’s procurement of commercially available commodities by increasing competition, reducing prices, and improving opportunities for small businesses. (b) Use of reverse auctions The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended— (1) by redesignating section 47 as section 48; and (2) by inserting after section 46 the following: 47. Reverse auctions prohibited for covered contracts (a) In general In the case of a covered contract described in subsection (c), reverse auction methods may not be used— (1) if the covered contract is suitable for award to a small business concern; or (2) if the award is to be made under— (A) section 8(a); (B) section 8(m); (C) section 15(a); (D) section 15(j); (E) section 31; (F) section 36; or (G) section 8127 of title 38, United States Code. (b) Limitations on using reverse auctions (1) Number of offers; revisions to bids A Federal agency may not award a covered contract using a reverse auction method if only one offer is received or if offerors do not have the ability to submit revised bids throughout the course of the auction. (2) Other procurement authority A Federal agency may not award a covered contract under a procurement provision other than those provisions described in subsection (a)(2) if the justification for using such procurement provision is to use reverse auction methods. (c) Definitions In this section the following definitions apply: (1) Covered contract The term covered contract means a contract— (A) for services, including design and construction services; and (B) for goods in which the technical qualifications of the offeror constitute part of the basis of award. (2) Design and construction services The term design and construction services means— (A) site planning and landscape design; (B) architectural and interior design; (C) engineering system design; (D) performance of construction work for facility, infrastructure, and environmental restoration projects; (E) delivery and supply of construction materials to construction sites; (F) construction, alteration, or repair, including painting and decorating, of public buildings and public works; and (G) architectural and engineering services as defined in section 1102 of title 40, United States Code. (3) Reverse auction The term reverse auction means, with respect to procurement by an agency, a real-time auction conducted through an electronic medium between a group of offerors who compete against each other by submitting offers for a contract or task order with the ability to submit revised offers throughout the course of the auction. . (c) Contracts awarded by Secretary of Veterans Affairs Section 8127(j) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The provisions of section 47(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) (relating to the prohibition on using reverse auction methods to award a contract) shall apply to a contract awarded under this section. . 816. SBA surety bond guarantee Section 411(c)(1) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694b(c)(1)) is amended by striking 70 and inserting 90. C Other Matters 821. Certification of effectiveness for Air Force information technology contracting (a) Review required The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall conduct a review of the Air Force Network-Centric Solutions II (NETCENTS II) contract to ensure that it can effectively meet the requirements of the joint force when providing time- and task-critical information technology resources for hardware, applications, and services related to the warfighting mission area. The review shall examine— (1) the effectiveness of contracting for warfighting mission areas, such as nuclear command and control, space situational awareness, or integrated threat warning, with effectiveness determined by the ability to consistently access domain experts and respond to emerging requirements in a timely manner; and (2) the efficiency of contracting for the warfighting mission area, with efficiency measured by the amount of time to get new task orders on contract. (b) Certification Based on the findings of the review required by subsection (a), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide a certification to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the Air Force’s NETCENTS II contract is effective in delivering information technology capabilities for the joint force. In providing this certification, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall also provide the complete findings of the review required by subsection (a). 822. Airlift service (a) In general Chapter 157 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the following new section: 2631b. Airlift service (a) Requirement Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), the transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service may only be provided by a covered air carrier. (b) Applicability The requirement under subsection (a) applies with respect to transportation that is— (1) interstate in the United States; (2) between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States; or (3) between two places outside the United States. (c) Waiver authority The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that— (1) no covered air carrier is capable of providing, and willing to provide, the relevant transportation; or (2) use of a covered air carrier is otherwise unreasonable. (d) Definitions In this section, the following definitions apply: (1) Covered air carrier The term covered air carrier means an air carrier that— (A) has aircraft in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet or offers to place CRAF-eligible aircraft in that fleet; and (B) holds a certificate issued under section 41102 of title 49. (2) CRAF-eligible aircraft The term CRAF-eligible aircraft means an aircraft of a type that the Secretary of Defense has determined to be eligible to participate in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2631a the following new item: 2631b. Airlift service. . 823. Compliance with requirements for senior Department of Defense officials seeking employment with defense contractors Section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Compliance (1) Official The Secretary of Defense shall designate an official of the Department of Defense to ensure the compliance of this section. (2) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, such designated official shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the compliance of this section. . 824. Procurement of personal protective equipment (a) Requirement The Secretary of Defense shall use best value tradeoff source selection methods to the maximum extent practicable when procuring an item of personal protective equipment or critical safety items. (b) Personal protective equipment defined In this section, the term personal protective equipment includes the following: (1) Body armor components. (2) Combat helmets. (3) Combat protective eyewear. (4) Environmental and fire resistant clothing. (5) Footwear. (6) Organizational clothing and individual equipment. (7) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary. 825. Prohibition on funds for contracts violating Executive Order No. 11246 None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used to enter into any contract with any entity if such contract would violate Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to nonretaliation for disclosure of compensation information), as amended by the announcement of the President on April 8, 2014. 826. Requirement for policies and standard checklist in procurement of services (a) Requirement Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j) as subsections (h), (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g): (g) Request for Service Contract Approval The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall— (1) issue policies implementing a standard checklist to be completed before the issuance of a solicitation for any new contract for services or exercising an option under an existing contract for services, including services provided under a contract for goods; and (2) ensure such policies and checklist are incorporated into the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation. . (b) Army model In implementing section 2330a(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall model, to the maximum extent practicable, its policies and checklist on the policies and checklist relating to services contract approval established and in use by the Department of the Army (as set forth in the request for services contract approval form updated as of August 2012, or any successor form). (c) Deadline The policies required under such section 2230a(g) shall be issued within 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Report The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the standard checklist required under such section 2330a(g) for each of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017 within 120 days after the end of each such fiscal year. IX Department of Defense Organization and Management A Department of Defense Management 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps (a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps (1) Redesignation of Military Department The military department designated as the Department of the Navy is redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. (2) Redesignation of Secretary and Other Statutory Offices (A) Secretary The position of the Secretary of the Navy is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps. (B) Other statutory offices The positions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively. (b) Conforming amendments to title 10, United States Code (1) Definition of Military Department Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (8) The term military department means the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air Force. . (2) Organization of Department The text of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as follows: The Department of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.. (3) Position of Secretary Section 5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking There is a Secretary of the Navy and inserting There is a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps. (4) Chapter Headings (A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to read as follows: 503 Department of the Navy and Marine Corps . (B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to read as follows: 507 Composition of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps . (5) Other Amendments (A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Department of the Navy and Secretary of the Navy each place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and inserting Department of the Navy and Marine Corps and Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively, in each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter stricken. (B) (i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and inserting Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps. (ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by inserting and Marine Corps after of the Navy, with the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter amended. (c) Other provisions of law and other references (1) Title 37, United States Code Title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking Department of the Navy and Secretary of the Navy each place they appear and inserting Department of the Navy and Marine Corps and Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively. (2) Other References Any reference in any law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to that office as redesignated by that section. (d) Effective date This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 902. Additional responsibility for Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (a) Additional responsibility Section 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) The Director shall consider the potential for increases in program cost estimates or delays in schedule estimates in the implementation of policies, procedures, and activities related to operational test and evaluation and shall take appropriate action to ensure that operational test and evaluation activities do not unnecessarily increase program costs or impede program schedules. . (b) Conforming amendment Section 196(c)(1)(A)(ii) of such title is amended by striking section 139(i) and inserting section 139(k). 903. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment (a) Establishment of position Section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (11) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment shall have the duties specified in section 138e of this title. . (b) Duties (1) In general Chapter 4 of such title is amended by inserting after section 138d the following new section: 138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment (a) The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment shall— (1) provide leadership and facilitate communication regarding, and conduct oversight to manage and be accountable for, military construction and environmental programs within the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps; (2) coordinate and oversee planning and programming activities of the Department of Defense and the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps; (3) establish policies and guidance, in coordination with the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps, regarding installation assets and services that are required to support defense missions. (b) The Assistant Secretary may communicate views on issues within the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary directly to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections for chapter 4 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 138c the following new item: 138e. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. . (c) Conforming amendments (1) In general (A) Section 2701(k)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment and inserting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. (B) Section 2885(a)(3) of such title is amended by striking Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) and inserting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. (2) References in other laws Any reference in any law, regulation, document, or other record of the United States to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment shall be treated as referring to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. (d) No additional funds authorized No additional funds are authorized by this Act to accomplish the mission of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment. Such mission shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated. (e) Restriction on personnel The number of positions for military and civilian personnel and the number of full-time equivalent positions for contractor personnel associated with the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment shall not exceed the number of such positions that were associated with the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (f) Construction Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed as exempting the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment from further reductions as part of headquarters efficiencies initiatives of the Department of Defense. 904. Requirement for congressional briefing before divesting of Defense Finance and Accounting Service functions No plan may be implemented by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Director of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, or any other person to transfer financial management, bill paying, or accounting services functions from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to another entity until the Secretary of Defense provides the congressional defense committees a briefing on the plan and the Secretary certifies to such committees that the plan would reduce costs, increase efficiencies, maintain the timeline for auditability of financial statements, and maintain the roles and missions of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. 905. Combatant command efficiency plan (a) Plan required The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to combine the back office functions of the headquarters of two or more combatant commands, including the subordinate component commands. (b) Matters to be considered The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing in whole or in part similar back office functions between two or more combatant command headquarters located in the same country. (2) A detailed discussion of combining or otherwise sharing in whole or in part similar back office functions of the Joint Staff and some or all combatant command headquarters. (3) A detailed discussion of establishing a new organization to manage similar back office functions of two or more combatant command headquarters located in the same country. (4) A detailed discussion of the risks and capabilities lost by implementing such consolidations and efficiencies. (5) A detailed discussion of how the efficiencies and consolidations in assigned personnel and resources are in support of the quadrennial defense review and the strategic choices and management review of the Department of Defense. (6) Any other arrangements that the Secretary considers appropriate. (c) Report required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (1) a summary of the plan required by subsection (a); and (2) the potential cost savings of any arrangements the Secretary considers in conducting the study. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Back office functions The term back office functions means the administration and support functions of a headquarters of a combatant command, including human resources or other personnel functions, budgeting, and information technology support. (2) Combatant command The term combatant command means a combatant command established pursuant to section 161 or 167 of title 10, United States Code. (e) Limitation Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense for operations and maintenance, defense-wide, Joint Chiefs of Staff, as specified in the funding table for section 4301, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provides the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the briefing on combatant command headquarters personnel and resources requirements as directed in the Report of the Committee on Armed Services on H.R. 1960 of the 113th Congress (House Report 113–102) under title X. 906. Requirement for plan to reduce geographic combatant commands to four by fiscal year 2020 (a) Plan required The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for reducing the number of geographic combatant commands to no more than four by the end of fiscal year 2020. (b) Matters covered The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A detailed discussion of the required reductions and consolidations in assigned personnel, resources, and infrastructure of the various geographic combatant commands, set forth separately by fiscal year, to achieve the goal of no more than four such commands by the end of fiscal year 2020. (2) A detailed discussion of the changes to the Unified Command Plan if such reductions and consolidations are implemented. (3) A detailed discussion and recommendations on the feasibility, risks, and capabilities lost by implementing such reductions and consolidations. (c) Functional commands not included Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Department of Defense to include changes to the functional combatant commands or reductions in the functional combatant commands in the plan required by subsection (a). (d) Use of previous studies and outside experts In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Secretary may— (1) use and incorporate previous plans or studies of the Department of Defense; and (2) consult with and incorporate views of defense experts from outside the Department. (e) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the plan required by subsection (a), including the feasibility and risks of such plan, and any recommendations to implement the plan as the Secretary considers appropriate. (f) Construction Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the Secretary to develop a binding plan. 907. Office of Net Assessment (a) Policy It is the policy of the United States to maintain an independent organization within the Department of Defense to develop and coordinate net assessments of the standing, trends, and future prospects of the military capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison with the military capabilities and potential of other countries or groups of countries so as to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States. (b) Establishment (1) In general Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 145. Office of Net Assessment (a) In general There is in the Office of the Secretary of Defense an office known as the Office of Net Assessment. (b) Head (1) The head of the Office of Net Assessment shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense. The head shall be a member of the Senior Executive Service. (2) The head of the Office of Net Assessment may communicate views on matters within the responsibility of the head directly to the Secretary without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense. (3) The head of the Office of Net Assessment shall report directly to the Secretary. (4) The Office is subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary. The Secretary may not delegate the responsibility to exercise such authority, direction, and control over the Office. (c) Responsibilities The Office of Net Assessment shall develop and coordinate net assessments with respect to the standing, trends, and future prospects of the military capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison with the military capabilities and potential of other countries or groups of countries to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States. (d) Budget In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submittal to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, of the budget for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, the Secretary shall ensure that a separate, dedicated program element is assigned for the Office of Net Assessment. (e) Net assessment defined In this section, the term net assessment means the comparative analysis of military, technological, political, economic, and other factors governing the relative military capability of nations. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 145. Office of Net Assessment. . 908. Amendments relating to organization and management of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (a) Deputy chief management officer Subsection (b) of section 132a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (b) Responsibilities Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Chief Management Officer shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary may prescribe. The Deputy Chief Management Officer shall— (1) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s capacity as Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title and perform those duties assigned by the Secretary of Defense or delegated by the Deputy Secretary pursuant to section 904(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 132 note); (2) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense under section 1123 of title 31; (3) establish policies for the strategic management and integration of the Department of Defense business operations and activities; (4) have the responsibilities specified for the Deputy Chief Management Officer for the purposes of section 2222 of this title; and (5) be the Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense for the purposes of section 1124(a)(1) of title 31. . (b) Chief information officer of the Department of Defense (1) Statutory establishment of position Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 141 the following new section: 142. Chief information officer (a) There is a Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (b) (1) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense— (A) is the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense for the purposes of sections 3506(a)(2) and 3544(a)(3) of title 44; (B) has the responsibilities and duties specified in section 11315 of title 40; and (C) has the responsibilities specified for the Chief Information Officer in sections 2222, 2223(a), and 2224 of this title. (2) The Chief Information Officer shall perform such additional duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe. (c) The Chief Information Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense with the officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title. The officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense take precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. . (2) Placement in the office of the secretary of defense Section 131(b) of such title is amended— (A) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through (8) as paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): (5) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. . (c) Repeal of requirement for defense business system management committee Section 186 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (d) Assignment of responsibility for defense business systems Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by inserting and at the end of paragraph (1); (B) by striking ; and at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting a period; and (C) by striking paragraph (3); (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking Defense Business Systems Management Committee and inserting investment review board established under subsection (g); and (3) in subsection (g)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking , not later than March 15, 2012,; (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking each the first place it appears and inserting the; and (C) in paragraph (2)(F), by striking and the Defense Business Systems Management Committee, as required by section 186(c) of this title,. (e) Deadline for establishment of investment review board and investment management process The investment review board and investment management process required by section 2222(g) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (d)(3), shall be established not later than March 15, 2015. (f) Amendments relating to Certain Prescribed Assistant Secretary of Defense Positions Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows: (1) Assistant secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is amended— (A) by inserting after Readiness in the first sentence the following: , who shall be appointed from among persons with an extensive background in the sustainment of major weapons systems and combat support equipment; (B) by striking the second sentence; (C) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of section 138a of such title; (D) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of subsection (c) of section 138a of such title; and (E) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text transferred by subparagraph (D) of this paragraph as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively. (2) Assistant secretary of defense for research and engineering Paragraph (8) of such section is amended— (A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (a) of section 138b; (B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the following: The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall—; (C) by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph), indenting those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (D) in subparagraph (A) (as so transferred and redesignated)— (i) by striking The Assistant Secretary and all that follows through Test and Evaluation, shall; and (ii) by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and (E) in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and redesignated), by striking The Assistant Secretary and all that follows through Test and Evaluation, shall. (3) Assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs Paragraph (10) of such section is amended— (A) by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (b) of section 138d; and (B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the text of subsection (a) of such section and in that text as so inserted— (i) by striking of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs and (ii) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively. (4) Repeal of separate sections Sections 138a, 138b, and 138d are repealed. (g) Codification of restrictions on use of the deputy under secretary of defense title (1) Codification Section 137a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) The officials authorized under this section shall be the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense. . (2) Conforming repeal Section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed. (3) Conforming amendment for the vacancy reform act of 1998 Section 137a(b) of such title is amended by striking is absent or disabled and inserting dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office. (h) Clarification of order of precedence for the principal deputy under secretaries of defense and the assistant secretaries of defense (1) Subsection (d) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking and the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense and inserting the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, and the officials serving in the positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (2) Subsection (d) of section 138 of such title is amended by inserting and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense after section 131(b)(4) of this title. (i) Conforming amendment to prior reduction in the number of assistant secretaries of defense Section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16) and inserting Assistant Secretaries of Defense (14). (j) Clerical and conforming amendments Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 is amended— (A) by striking the items relating to sections 138a, 138b, and 138d; and (B) by inserting after the item relating to section 141 the following new item: 142. Chief Information Officer. . (2) Section 131(b)(8), as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)(A), is amended— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the following new subparagraph (A): (A) The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation under section 139a(c) of this title. . (3) Section 132(b) is amended by striking is disabled or there is no Secretary of Defense and inserting dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office. (4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended by striking the item relating to section 186. 909. Periodic review of Department of Defense management headquarters (a) Plan required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters. (b) Elements of plan The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following for each covered organization: (1) A list of the key Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices and management review. (2) A description of how current management headquarters are structured to execute the Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements listed under paragraph (1). (3) A description of the critical capabilities and skillsets required by management headquarters to execute Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill mission objectives. (4) An identification and analysis of the factors that directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense of Department of Defense management headquarters (5) A description of the proposed timeline and required resources necessary to implement a permanent periodic review and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters. (c) Covered organization In this section, the term covered organization includes each of the following: (1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2) The Joint Staff. (3) The Defense Agencies. (4) The Department of Defense field activities. (5) The headquarters of the combatant commands. (6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff. (7) The major command headquarters of the Army. (8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps. (9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and the Marine Corps. (10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff. (11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force. (12) The National Guard Bureau. (d) Report Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a). (e) Amendments Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended— (1) by striking 2016 and inserting 2017; (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting , consolidations, after through changes; (3) in subparagraph (C)— (A) by inserting , consolidations, after through changes; and (B) by inserting , or other associated cost drivers, including a discussion of how the changes, consolidations, or reductions were prioritized, after programs and offices; (4) in subparagraph (E), by inserting , including the risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing, such modifications before the period; and (5) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (F) A description of how the plan supports or affects current Department of Defense strategic guidance, policy, and mission requirements, including the quadrennial defense review, the Unified Command Plan, and the strategic choices and management review. (G) A description of the associated costs specifically addressed by the savings. . B Total Force Management 911. Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management, functional, and technical workforce of the Department of Defense (a) Senior management workforce Subsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: (1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall— (A) include a separate chapter to specifically address the shaping and improvement of the senior management workforce of the Department of Defense; and (B) include an assessment of the senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense within the appropriate functional community. ; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking such senior management, functional, and technical workforce and inserting such senior management workforce and such senior functional and technical workforce. (b) Highly qualified experts Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subsection (f)(1) in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2); (2) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Highly qualified experts (1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of the Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the HQE workforce). (2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce— (A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and other attrition; (B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such strategies; (C) any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE personnel; (D) any changes that may be necessary in resources or in the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure the Department has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and (E) any legislative changes that may be necessary to achieve HQE workforce goals. . (c) Definitions Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as follows: (h) Definitions In this section: (1) The term senior management workforce of the Department of Defense includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel: (A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5. (B) Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service under section 1606 of this title. (2) The term senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel: (A) Persons serving in positions described in section 5376(a) of title 5. (B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A-315)). (C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note). (D) Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level positions under section 1607 of this title. (3) The term acquisition workforce includes individuals designated under section 1721 of this title as filling acquisition positions. . (d) Conforming amendment The heading of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: Senior Management Workforce; Senior Functional and Technical Workforce.—. 912. Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on inventory Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402), as amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 839), is amended by striking 2013, 2014, and 2015 and inserting and 2013. 913. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency (a) Amendment Chapter 146 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2463 the following new section: 2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency (a) Assignments based on determinations of cost-efficiency (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subject to subsection (b), the assignment of performance of a new requirement by the Department of Defense to military personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel shall be based on a determination of which sector of the Department’s workforce can perform the services in the most cost-efficient manner, based on an analysis of the costs to the Federal Government in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 7041.04 (Estimating and Comparing the Full Costs of Civilian and Active Duty Military Manpower and Contract Support) or successor guidance. (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of a new requirement that is inherently governmental, closely associated with inherently governmental functions, critical, or required by law to be performed by military personnel or civilian personnel. (3) Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting the requirements of the Department of Defense under policies and procedures established by the Secretary of Defense under section 129a of this title for determining the most appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense. (b) Waiver authority (1) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of a military department, the commander of a combatant command, or the head of a Defense Agency or activity may waive such subsection and assign performance of a new requirement without a determination of cost-efficiency as required by such subsection if— (A) the Secretary, commander, or head certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the time required to conduct the determination of cost-efficiency would result in a gap in service that would significantly undermine performance of the mission of the Department of Defense or pose an unacceptable risk; and (B) a period of 30 days has expired after such certification is so submitted to the committees. (2) A waiver of subsection (a) may be in effect for a period of not greater than 180 days. (3) The waiver authority under this subsection may not be exercised after September 30, 2015. (c) Provisions relating to assignment of civilian personnel If a new requirement is assigned to civilian personnel consistent with the requirements of this section— (1) the Secretary of Defense may not— (A) impose any constraint or limitation on the size of the civilian workforce in terms of man years, end strength, full-time equivalent positions, or maximum number of employees; or (B) require offsetting funding for civilian pay or benefits or require a reduction in civilian full-time equivalents or civilian end-strengths; and (2) the Secretary may assign performance of such requirement without regard to whether the employee is a temporary, term, or permanent employee. (d) New requirement described For purposes of this section, a new requirement is an activity or function that is not being performed, as of the date of consideration for assignment of performance under this section, by military personnel, civilian personnel, or contractor personnel at a Department of Defense component, organization, installation, or other entity. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an activity or function that is performed at such an entity and that is re-engineered, reorganized, modernized, upgraded, expanded, or changed to become more efficient but is still essentially providing the same service shall not be considered a new requirement. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2463 the following new item: 2463a. Assignment of certain new requirements based on determinations of cost-efficiency. . 914. Prohibition on conversion of functions performed by civilian or contractor personnel to performance by military personnel Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Prohibition on performance of certain functions by military personnel (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), no functions performed by civilian personnel or contractors may be converted to performance by military personnel unless— (A) there is a direct link between the functions to be performed and a military occupational specialty; and (B) the conversion to performance by military personnel is cost effective, based on Department of Defense instruction 7041.04 (or any successor administrative regulation, directive, or policy). (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following functions: (A) Functions required by law or regulation to be performed by military personnel. (B) Functions related to— (i) missions involving operation risks and combatant status under the Law of War; (ii) specialized collective and individual training requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on recent operational experience; (iii) independent advice to senior civilian leadership in the Department of Defense requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on recent operational experience; and (iv) command and control arrangements under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). . 915. Notification of compliance with section relating to procurement of services (a) Notification The Secretary of Defense shall ensure compliance with section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, and shall provide, in writing, notification of such compliance to the congressional defense committees not later than March 1, 2015. (b) Review by comptroller general The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the notification of compliance required by subsection (a) and report any findings or recommendations to the congressional defense committees not later than 120 days after the date on which the notification is provided. C Other Matters 921. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental personnel at Department of Defense regional centers for security studies Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by striking through 2014 and inserting through 2019. 922. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense and Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while performing official travel (a) Definition Section 5911(a)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking Government; and and inserting Government or commercial lodging arranged through a Government lodging program; and. (b) Authority Section 5911(e) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking (e) The and inserting (e)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (2) (A) The Secretary of Defense may require an employee of the Department of Defense or a member of the uniformed services under the Secretary’s jurisdiction performing duty on official travel to occupy adequate quarters on a rental basis when available. (B) A requirement under subparagraph (A) with respect to an employee of the Department of Defense may not be construed to be subject to negotiation under chapter 71 or any other provision of this title. . 923. Single standard mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles of Government employees and members of the uniformed services (a) In general Section 5704(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the last sentence by striking all that follows: the rate per mile and inserting shall be the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service.. (b) Regulations and reports (1) Provisions relating to privately owned airplanes and motorcycles Paragraph (1)(A) of section 5707(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (1) (A) The Administrator of General Services shall conduct periodic investigations of the cost of travel and the operation of privately owned airplanes and privately owned motorcycles by employees while engaged on official business, and shall report the results of such investigations to Congress at least once a year. . (2) Provisions relating to privately owned automobiles Clause (i) of section 5707(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (i) shall provide that the mileage reimbursement rate for privately owned automobiles, as provided in section 5704(a)(1), is the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service referred to in that section, and . X General Provisions A Financial Matters 1001. General transfer authority (a) Authority to transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,000,000,000. (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations— (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on authorization amounts A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to congress The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 1002. Repeal of limitation on Inspector General audits of certain financial statements Section 1008 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1204; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking subsection (d). 1003. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization and naval reactors (a) Transfer authorized If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 is less than $8,700,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2015 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (b) Notice to congress In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred. (c) Transfer mechanism Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of law. (d) Construction of authority The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act. 1004. Management of Defense information technology systems (a) In general Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 2222. Management of Defense information technology systems (a) Conditions for obligation of funds for covered defense information technology system programs Funds available to the Department of Defense, whether appropriated or non-appropriated, may not be obligated for a defense information technology system program that will have a total cost in excess of $1,000,000 over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title unless— (1) the appropriate pre-certification authority for the covered defense information technology system program has determined that— (A) the defense information technology system program is in compliance with the enterprise architecture developed under subsection (b) and appropriate business process re-engineering efforts have been undertaken to ensure that— (i) the business process supported by the defense information technology system program is or will be as streamlined and efficient as practicable; and (ii) the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique requirements or incorporate unique interfaces has been eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent practicable; (B) the defense information technology system program is necessary to achieve a critical national security capability or address a critical requirement in an area such as safety or security; or (C) the defense information technology system program is necessary to prevent a significant adverse effect on a project that is needed to achieve an essential capability, taking into consideration the alternative solutions for preventing such adverse effect; and (2) the covered defense information technology system program has been reviewed and certified by the investment review board established under subsection (e). (b) Enterprise architecture for defense information technology systems (1) The Secretary of Defense shall develop an enterprise architecture, known as the joint information technology enterprise architecture, to cover all defense information technology systems, and the functions and activities supported by defense information technology systems, which shall be sufficiently defined to effectively guide, constrain, and permit implementation of interoperable defense information technology system solutions and consistent with the policies and procedures established by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall delegate responsibility and accountability for the defense information technology enterprise architecture content, including unambiguous definitions of functional processes, business rules, and standards, as follows: (A) For the warfighting mission area, the Joint Staff shall be responsible and accountable for the content of those portions of the defense information systems enterprise architecture. (B) For the business systems mission area, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content of those portions of the defense information technology enterprise architecture. (C) For the Enterprise Information environment mission area, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall be responsible and accountable for the content of those portions of the defense information technology enterprise architecture. (c) Composition of enterprise architecture The defense information technology enterprise architecture developed under subsection (b)(1)(A) shall include the following: (1) An information infrastructure that, at a minimum, would enable the Department of Defense to comply with all applicable law. (2) Policies, procedures, data standards, performance measures, and system interface requirements that are to apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense. (3) A target defense information technology systems computing environment, compliant with the defense information technology enterprise architecture, as determined by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (d) Designation of appropriate pre-certification authorities and senior officials For purposes of subsections (a) and (e), the appropriate pre-certification authority for a defense information technology system program is as follows: (1) In the case of an Army program, the Secretary of the Army. (2) In the case of a Navy program, the Secretary of the Navy. (3) In the case of an Air Force program, the Secretary of the Air Force. (4) In the case of a program of a Defense Agency, the Director, or equivalent, of such Defense Agency, unless otherwise approved by the Secretary of Defense. (5) In the case of a program that will support the business processes of more than one military department or Defense Agency, an appropriate pre-certification authority designated by the Secretary of Defense. (e) Defense information technology system investment review (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish an investment review board and investment management process to review and certify the planning, design, acquisition, development, deployment, operation, maintenance, modernization, and project cost benefits and risks of covered defense information technology systems programs. The investment review board and investment management process so established shall specifically address the requirements of subsection (a). (2) The review of defense information technology systems programs under the investment management process shall include the following: (A) Review and approval by an investment review board of each covered defense information technology system program before the obligation of funds on the system in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a). (B) Periodic review of all covered defense information technology system programs, grouped in mission areas. (C) Representation on each investment review board by appropriate officials from among the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the armed forces, the combatant commands, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Defense Agencies, including representation from each of the following: (i) The appropriate pre-certification authority for the defense information technology system under review. (ii) The appropriate senior official of the Department of Defense for the functions and activities supported by the defense information technology system under review. (iii) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. (D) Use of threshold criteria to ensure an appropriate level of review within the Department of Defense of, and accountability for, defense information technology system programs depending on scope, complexity, and cost. (E) Use of procedures for making certifications in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a). (f) Budget information In the materials that the Secretary submits to Congress in support of the budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for fiscal year 2015 and fiscal years thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following information: (1) Identification of each defense information technology system program for which funding is proposed in that budget. (2) Identification of all funds, by appropriation, proposed in that budget for each such program, including— (A) funds for current services (to operate and maintain the system covered by such program); and (B) funds for information technology systems modernization, identified for each specific appropriation. (3) For each such program, identification of the appropriate pre-certification authority and senior official of the Department of Defense designated under subsection (d). (4) For each such program, a description of each approval made under subsection (a)(3) with regard to such program, including— (A) specific milestones and actual performance against specified performance measures, and any revision of such milestones and performance measures; and (B) specific actions on the defense information technology system programs submitted for certification under such subsection. (5) Identification of any covered defense information technology system program during the preceding fiscal year that was not approved under subsection (a), and the reasons for the lack of approval. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term enterprise architecture has the meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44. (4) The terms information system and information technology have the meanings given those terms in section 11101 of title 40. (5) The term national security system has the meaning given that term in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44. . (b) Clerical amendment The item relating to section 2222 in the table of chapters at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended to read as follows: 2222. Management of Defense information technology systems. . B Counter-Drug Activities 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (a) Extension Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking 2014 and inserting 2015; and (2) in subsection (c), by striking 2014 and inserting 2015. (b) Notice to Congress on assistance Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision of such assistance. 1012. Three-year extension of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510;10 U.S.C. 374 note), as most recently amended by section 1005 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), is amended by striking During fiscal years 2012 through 2014 and inserting During fiscal years 2014 through 2017. 1013. Submittal of biannual reports on use of funds in the drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide account on the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate Consistent with section 481(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act (22 U.S.C. 2291b), section 1009(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1906) is amended by inserting , the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate after congressional defense committees. 1014. National Guard drug interdiction and counter-drug activities Section 112 of title 32, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) The operation of regionally located National Guard Counter-drug Training Centers within the United States for the purposes of providing counter-drug related training to Federal, State, and local law enforcement personnel, as well as for foreign law enforcement personnel participating in the National Guard State Partnership Program. ; and (2) in subsection (h)(1), by inserting and activities that counter threats posed by local, State, and transnational criminal organizations drug smuggling and associated illicit activities within and on their borders, as after drug demand reduction activities. 1015. Sense of Congress on Mexico and Central America (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The stability and security of Mexico and the nations of Central America have a direct impact on the stability and security of the United States. (2) Over the past decade, a balloon effect has pushed increased violence and instability into Central America and Mexico from South America. (3) Drug cartels and transnational criminal organizations have spread throughout the region, causing instability and lack of rule of law in many nations. (4) Illicit networks are used in a variety of illegal activities including the movement of narcotics, humans, weapons, and money. (5) According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Honduras has the highest murder rate in the world with 92 murders per 100,000 people. (6) Currently, Mexico is working to reduce violence created by transnational criminal organizations and address issues spurred by the emergence of internal self defense groups. (7) United States Northern Command and United States Southern Command lead the efforts of the Department of Defense in combating illicit networking in Mexico and Central America. (8) To combat these destabilizing threats, through a variety of authorities, the Department of Defense advises, trains, educates, and equips vetted troops in Mexico and many of the nations of Central America to build their militaries and police forces, with an emphasis on human rights and building partnership capacity. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Department of Defense should continue to focus on combating illicit networking routes in Mexico and Central America; (2) United States Northern Command and United States Southern Command should continue to work together to combat the transnational nature of these threats; and (3) the Department of Defense should increase its maritime, aerial and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets in the region in order to reduce the amount of illicit networking flowing into the United States. C Naval Vessels and Shipyards 1021. Definition of combatant and support vessel for purposes of the annual plan and certification relating to budgeting for construction of naval vessels Section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) The term combatant and support vessel means any commissioned ship built or armed for naval combat or any naval ship designed to provide support to combatant ships and other naval operations. Such term does not include patrol coastal ships, non-commissioned combatant craft specifically designed for combat roles, or ships that are designated for potential mobilization. . 1022. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund (a) In general (1) Establishment of fund Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the following new section: 2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund (a) Establishment There is established in the Treasury a fund to be known as the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund. (b) Administration of fund The Secretary of Defense shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of this section. (c) Fund purposes (1) Funds in the Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for the advanced procurement or construction of nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. (2) Funds in the Fund may not be used for a purpose or program unless the purpose or program is authorized by law. (d) Deposits There shall be deposited in the Fund all funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal years after fiscal year 2016 for the advanced procurement or construction of nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. (e) Expiration of funds after 10 years No part of an appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more than 10 years after the end of the fiscal year for which appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by law. (f) Budget requests Budget requests submitted to Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount requested for programs, projects, and activities for the construction (including the design of vessels) of nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Fund means the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a). (2) The term nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarine means any nuclear-powered submarine owned, operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense with the primary mission of launching nuclear-armed ballistic missiles. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2218 the following new item: 2218a. National sea-based deterrence fund. . (b) Transfer authority (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), and to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), amounts not to exceed $3,500,000,000 from unobligated funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016 for the Navy for shipbuilding and conversion, Navy, for the advanced procurement or construction, purchase, or alteration of nuclear-powered strategic ballistic missile submarines. The transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in addition to any other transfer authority provided to the Secretary of Defense by law. (2) Availability Funds transferred to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund pursuant to paragraph (1) shall remain available for the same period for which the transferred funds were originally appropriated. 1023. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval flight officer be in command of an inactivated nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning Section 5942(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) after (a); and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that has been inactivated for the purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal. . 1024. Limitation on expenditure of funds until commencement of planning of refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George Washington Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available under section 301 of this Act for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense obligates funds to commence the planning and long lead time material procurement associated with the refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73). 1025. Sense of Congress recognizing the anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. Thresher (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on July 9, 1960. (2) U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16 officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians. (3) The mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection of the United States. (4) At approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S. Thresher began her final descent. (5) U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on April 10, 1963. (6) In response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the United States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure the health of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the United States. (7) Those regulations led to the establishment of the Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program (SUBSAFE), now one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the world. (8) SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United States safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine force in history. (9) Since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no SUBSAFE-certified submarine has been lost at sea, which is a legacy owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S. Thresher. (10) From the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, there arose in the institutions of higher education in the United States the ocean engineering curricula that enables the preeminence of the United States in submarine warfare. (11) The crew of U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the last full measure of devotion in service to the United States, and this devotion characterizes the sacrifices of all submariners, past and present. (b) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) recognizes the 51st anniversary of the sinking of U.S.S. Thresher; (2) remembers with profound sorrow the loss of U.S.S. Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and civilians on April 10, 1963; and (3) expresses its deepest gratitude to all submariners on eternal patrol, who are forever bound together by dedicated and honorable service to the United States of America. 1026. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships (a) Limitation on the availability of funds Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship. (b) Cruiser upgrades As provided by section 8107 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76), the Secretary of the Navy shall begin the upgrade of two cruisers during fiscal year 2015, including— (1) hull, mechanical, and electrical upgrades; and (2) combat systems modernizations. D Counterterrorism 1031. Extension of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2015. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (a) In general No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by Congress. (b) Exception The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (c) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined In this section, the term individual detained at Guantanamo means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— (1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (2) is— (A) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or (B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 1033. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who— (1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. E Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 1041. Modification of Department of Defense authority for humanitarian demining assistance and stockpiled conventional munitions assistance programs (a) Inclusion of information about insufficient funding in annual report Subsection (d)(3) of section 407 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting or insufficient funding after such activities; (b) Definition of stockpiled conventional munitions assistance Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended— (1) by striking and includes and inserting the following: small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems. Such term includes; and (2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: , small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems. 1042. Authority to accept voluntary services of law students and persons studying to be paralegals Section 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (10) Internship or externship services provided by law students or persons studying to be a paralegal, when such services are provided under the direct supervision of an attorney. . 1043. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the Department of Defense reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense entities (a) Eligible categories of transportation Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking The Secretary and inserting Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary; (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by striking During the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and ending on September 30, 2019, for and inserting For; (B) by striking of Defense the first place it appears and all that follows through military sales and inserting of Defense; and (C) by striking , but only if and all that follows through commercial transportation industry; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (4) For military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales. (5) For military transportation services provided to a State, local, or tribal agency (including any organization composed of State, local, or tribal agencies). (6) For military transportation services provided to a Department of Defense contractor when transporting supplies that are for, or destined for, a Department of Defense entity. . (b) Termination of authority for certain categories of transportation Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Termination of authority for certain categories of transportation The provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military transportation services provided before October 1, 2024. . (c) Clerical amendments (1) Section heading The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: Use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate . (2) Table of sections The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended to read as follows: 2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: Use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate. . 1044. Repeal of authority relating to use of military installations by civil reserve air fleet contractors (a) Repeal Section 9513 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9513. 1045. Certification and limitation on availability of funds for aviation foreign internal defense program (a) Certification (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification regarding the aviation foreign internal defense program that includes each of the following: (A) An overall description of the program, included validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant commands and the Joint Staff, and statutory authorities used to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal defense programs within the Department of Defense. (B) Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success, and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance costs across the Future Years Defense Program. (C) A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying contributing commands and units for program execution, including the use of Air Force, Special Operations Command, Reserve, and National Guard forces and components. (D) The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the aviation foreign internal defense program. (E) Any other items the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. (2) Form The certification required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (b) Limitations (1) Limitations on the use of funds None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 may be obligated or expended to support the aviation foreign internal defense program, or to retire, transfer, or divest any asset of such program, until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees the certification required under subsection (a). (2) Limitation on disposition of aircraft No aircraft that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is part of the aviation foreign internal defense program may be transferred into or maintained in a status that is considered excess to the requirements of the possessing command and awaiting disposition instructions. 1046. Submittal of procedures and report relating to sensitive military operations Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees— (1) the procedures required to be submitted by section 130f(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code; and (2) the report required to be submitted under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 857). 1047. Limitation on use of Russian-flagged airlift aircraft to support the airlift movement requirements of the United States Transportation Command None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2015 may be used to fly any Russian-flagged airlift aircraft to support any airlift movement requirement of the United States Transportation Command until the commander of the United States Transportation Command certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives that with respect to the airlift movement requirement, using the Russian-flagged airlift aircraft is the only means available to the commander to execute the requirement. 1048. Prohibition on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base until completion of assessments by Secretary of Defense and Government Accountability Office The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, Portugal, below the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013, until 30 days after the following occur: (1) The Secretary of Defense concludes the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary on January 25, 2013. (2) The Secretary briefs the congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment, including a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base in supporting the United States overseas force posture. (3) The Comptroller General of the United States reviews and validates the results of such Assessment and conducts an independent assessment of the possible operational capabilities of Lajes Air Force Base. 1049. Limitation on removal of C–130 aircraft The Secretary of the Air Force may not remove C–130 aircraft from a unit of the regular or reserve components of the Air Force that is tasked with the modular airborne fire fighting system mission, or from a unit that is formally associated with a unit that is tasked with such mission, until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that such mission will not be negatively affected by the removal of such aircraft. 1050. Conditions on Army National Guard and active Army force structure changes pending Comptroller General report (a) Certain reductions prohibited During fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not carry out any of the following actions: (1) Reduce the end strength for active duty personnel of the Army for a fiscal year below 490,000. (2) Reduce the end strength for Selected Reserve personnel of the Army National Guard of the United States for a fiscal year below 350,000. (3) Transfer AH-64 Attack helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army. (b) Report required Not later than March 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a review of the analyses of any counter-proposals submitted to the Army by the Chief of the National Guard and conducted by the Army and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment Program Evaluation Office as the basis for the decision to determine the future force structure of the Army, including the appropriate mix between regular Army, the National Guard, and the Army Reserve. (c) Elements of report The report required by subsection (b) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) An assessment of the force structure model used to conduct the analysis and determination of whether proper assumptions were made based on the current budget program, the National Military Strategy, and Combatant Commanders’ operational requirements for the Army. (2) An assessment of the cost analysis models used to make the determinations regarding which Army aviation platforms should be retained and in which component, including the projected costs and savings associated with the determinations. (3) A comparison of the operational readiness rates for the past five years for the equipment platforms that comprise aviation brigades of the regular Army and the Army National Guard. (4) An assessment of the manning levels required for combat aviation brigades in the regular Army and the Army National Guard, including whether the resources to fund full-time support of military technicians was properly applied to fill the authorized positions in States with aviation brigades. (d) No limitation on aviation training Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed— (1) to limit the provision of qualification training for military occupational specialties related to Army Aviation; or (2) to prevent the Secretary of the Army from continuing flight training and advanced qualification courses for selected National Guard AH-64 personnel in accordance with current force structure and Army readiness requirements. (e) Sense of Congress regarding additional funding for the Army National Guard Congress is concerned with the planned reductions and realignments the Army has proposed with respect to aviation realignment of combat aviation aircraft in the Army National Guard as well as greater reductions in active component end strength and brigade combat teams. F Studies and Reports 1061. Protection of defense mission-critical infrastructure from electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems (a) Certification required Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees certification that defense mission-critical infrastructure requiring electromagnetic pulse protection that receives power supply from commercial or other non-military sources is protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. (b) Form of submission The certification required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in classified form. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term defense mission-critical infrastructure means Department of Defense infrastructure of defense critical systems essential to project, support, and sustain the Armed Forces and military operations worldwide. (2) The term defense critical system means a primary mission system or an auxiliary or supporting system— (A) the operational effectiveness and operational suitability of which are essential to the successful mission completion or to aggregate residual combat capability; and (B) the failure of which would likely result in the failure to complete a mission. 1062. Response of the Department of Defense to compromises of classified information (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Compromises of classified information cause indiscriminate and long-lasting damage to United States national security and often have a direct impact on the safety of warfighters. (2) In 2010, hundreds of thousands of classified documents were illegally copied and disclosed across the Internet. (3) Classified information has been disclosed in numerous public writings and manuscripts endangering current operations. (4) In 2013, nearly 1,700,000 files were downloaded from United States Government information systems, threatening the national security of the United States and placing the lives of United States personnel at extreme risk. The majority of the information compromised relates to the capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures of the Armed Forces of the United States, and is the single greatest quantitative compromise in the history of the United States. (5) The Department of Defense is taking steps to mitigate the harm caused by these leaks. (6) Congress must be kept apprised of the progress of the mitigation efforts to ensure the protection of the national security of the United States. (b) Reports required (1) Initial report Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken by the Secretary in response to significant compromises of classified information. Such report shall include each of the following: (A) A description of any changes made to Department of Defense policies or guidance relating to significant compromises of classified information, including regarding security clearances for employees of the Department, information technology, and personnel actions. (B) An overview of the efforts made by any task force responsible for the mitigation of such compromises of classified information. (C) A description of the resources of the Department that have been dedicated to efforts relating to such compromises. (D) A description of the plan of the Secretary to continue evaluating the damage caused by, and to mitigate the damage from, such compromises. (E) A general description and estimate of the anticipated costs associated with mitigating such compromises. (2) Updates to report During calendar years 2015 through 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees semiannual updates to the report required by paragraph (1). Each such update shall include information regarding any changes or progress with respect to the matters covered by such report. 1063. Report and briefing to Congress on procurement and inspection of armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles to transport civilian employees of the Department of Defense (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) civilian employees of the Department of Defense should be provided all reasonable protection while such employees are in hostile foreign areas, and such protection should include adequate armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicle transportation; and (2) to ensure adequate protection of civilian employees, the Department of Defense should employ stringent, uniform standards for the procurement and inspection upon delivery of armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles for use by civilian employees overseas. (b) Report required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the policies and procedures of the Department of Defense for procuring and inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees. Such report shall include— (1) a description of the policies and procedures of the Department of Defense at the time of the report for procuring and inspecting upon delivery armored commercial passenger-carrying vehicles for transporting civilian employees in hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas; (2) recommendations for any changes to such policies and procedures of the Department of Defense that the Secretary determines would increase the safety of civilian employees in hostile or potentially hostile locations overseas; and (3) any other relevant matter the Secretary determines appropriate. (c) Briefing required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a detailed briefing on the report required by subsection (b). 1064. Study on joint analytic capability of the Department of Defense (a) Independent assessment The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent assessment of the joint analytic capabilities of the Department of Defense to support strategy, plans, and force development and their link to resource decisions. (b) Conduct of assessment The assessment required by subsection (a) may, at the election of the Secretary, be conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, and has recognized credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs appropriate for the assessment. (c) Elements The assessment required by subsection (a) should include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) An assessment of the analytical capability of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Staff to support force planning, defense strategy development, program and budget decisions, and the review of war plans. (2) Recommendations on improvements to such capability as required, including changes to processes or organizations that may be necessary (d) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate. G Other Matters 1071. Technical and clerical amendments (a) Amendments To title 10, United States Code, to reflect enactment of title 41, united states code Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking section 6101(b)–(d) of title 41 and inserting section 6101 of title 41. (2) Section 2302 is amended— (A) in paragraph (7), by striking section 4 of such Act and inserting such section; and (B) in paragraph (9)(A)— (i) by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422) and inserting chapter 15 of title 41; and (ii) by striking such section and inserting such chapter. (3) Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking section 4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i)) and inserting section 103(3)(A) of title 41. (4) Section 2314 is amended by striking Sections 6101(b)–(d) and inserting Sections 6101. (5) Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c)) and inserting section 104 of title 41. (6) Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403) and inserting section 110 of title 41. (7) Section 2379 is amended— (A) in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)) and inserting section 103 of title 41; and (B) in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c)) and inserting section 104 of title 41. (8) Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended— (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking section 7 of such Act and inserting section 7104(a) of such title; and (B) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking section 7 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 and inserting section 7104(a) of title 41. (9) Section 2533(a) is amended by striking such Act in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting chapter 83 of such title. (10) Section 2533b is amended— (A) in subsection (h)— (i) in paragraph (1), by striking sections 34 and 35 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 and 431) and inserting sections 1906 and 1907 of title 41; and (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c)) and inserting section 104 of title 41; and (B) in subsection (m)— (i) in paragraph (2), by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403) and inserting section 105 of title 41; (ii) in paragraph (3), by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403) and inserting section 131 of title 41; and (iii) in paragraph (5), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c)) and inserting section 104 of title 41. (11) Section 2545(1) is amended by striking section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16)) and inserting section 131 of title 41. (12) Section 7312(f) is amended by striking Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5) and inserting Section 6101 of title 41. (b) Amendments to other defense-related statutes to reflect enactment of title 41, united states code (1) The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) is amended as follows: (A) Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended— (i) by striking the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.) and inserting chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) by striking that Act and inserting that chapter. (B) Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (i) in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422) and inserting chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13)) and inserting section 110 of title 41, United States Code. (C) Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422) and inserting chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code. (2) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows: (A) Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking section 4(12)(E) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(E)) and inserting section 103(5) of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking section 4(12)(F) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(F)) and inserting section 103(6) of title 41, United States Code. (B) Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)) and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code. (C) Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended— (i) in subsection (a)(5), by striking section 27(e) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423(e)) and inserting section 2105 of title 41, United States Code; (ii) in subsection (c)(1), by striking section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act and inserting section 131 of title 41, United States Code; and (iii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423) and inserting chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code. (D) Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (i) in subsection (b)(1), by striking section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421) and inserting section 1303 of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(j)) and inserting section 1126 of title 41, United States Code. (3) The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended as follows: (A) Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 357(b)) and inserting section 6701(3) of title 41, United States Code. (B) Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)) and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code. (4) Section 8118 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a note), is amended by striking section 34 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430) and inserting section 1906 of title 41, United States Code. (5) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as follows: (A) Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by striking section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A)) and inserting section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code. (B) Subsection (c) of section 1601 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— (i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking section 32A of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 1443 of this Act and inserting section 1903 of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking Subsections (a) and (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 57(a) and (b)) and inserting Section 8703(a) of title 41, United States Code. (6) Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d note), is amended by striking the Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48) and inserting chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code. (7) Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking section 26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B)) and inserting section 1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code. (8) Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3)) and inserting section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code. (9) Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b) and inserting section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code. (10) Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking section 32 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428) and inserting section 1902 of title 41, United States Code. (11) Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)) and inserting section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code. (12) Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106, 10 U.S.C. 7420 note) is amended by striking section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c)) and inserting section 3304(a) of title 41, United States Code. (13) Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c)) and inserting section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code,; (B) in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3)) and inserting section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code; (C) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)) and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code; and (D) in subsection (h), by striking section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423) and inserting chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code. (14) Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)) and inserting section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code. (15) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (A) in subsection (b), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code; and (B) in subsection (c)— (i) by striking section 25(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act and inserting section 1302(a) of title 41, United States Code; and (ii) by striking section 25(c)(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1)) and inserting section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41. (16) Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510, 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (A) by designating the subsection after subsection (k), relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and (B) in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking the first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; popularly known as the Wagner-O’Day Act) and inserting section 8502 of title 41, United States Code. (c) Amendments to title 10, United States Code, To reflect reclassification of provisions of law codified in title 50, united states code Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3002). (2) Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), 231a(c)(1), and 2501(a)(1)(A) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 404a) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3043). (3) Sections 167(g), 421(c), and 2557(c) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.). (4) Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 403–6(b)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3041(b)). (5) Section 429 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking Section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403–1) and inserting section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024); and (B) in subsection (e), by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). (6) Section 442(d) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 404e(a)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3045(a)). (7) Section 444 is amended— (A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking (50 U.S.C. 403o) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3515); and (B) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking (50 U.S.C. 403a et seq.) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). (8) Section 457 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking (50 U.S.C. 431) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3141); and (B) in subsection (c), by striking (50 U.S.C. 431(b)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3141(b)). (9) Sections 462, 1599a(a), and 1623(a) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 402 note) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3614). (10) Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), 496(a)(1), 2409(e)(1) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). (11) Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 403r) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3518). (12) Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 413) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3091). (d) Amendments to other defense-Related statutes To reflect reclassification of provisions of law codified in title 50, united states code (1) The following provisions of law are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)): (A) Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note). (B) Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 2271 note). (C) Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 2501 note). (2) Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.). (e) Date of enactment references Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and inserting on October 28, 2014. (2) Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under and inserting Under. (3) Section 2275(d) is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 and inserting before January 2, 2013; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 and inserting on or after January 2, 2013. (4) Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and inserting after December 31, 2011,. (5) Section 6328(c) is amended by striking on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and inserting on or after October 28, 2009,. (f) Other amendments to title 10, united states code Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 130f and inserting the following new item: 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. . (2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended by inserting a period at the end of the item relating to section 189. (3) Section 189(c)(1) is amended by striking 139c and inserting 2430(a). (4) Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma after as applicable. (5) Section 429 is amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking Section in the second sentence and inserting section; and (B) in subsection (c), by striking act and inserting law. (6) Section 674(b) is amended by striking afer and inserting after. (7) Section 949i(b) is amended by striking ,, and inserting a comma. (8) Section 950b(B)(2)(A) is amended by striking give and inserting given. (9) Section 1040(a)(1) is amended by striking .. and inserting a period. (10) Section 1044(d)(2) is amended by striking .. and inserting a period. (11) Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking subparagraph in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting subparagraphs. (12) Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking U.S.C.1411 and inserting U.S.C. 1411. (13) Section 2222(g)(3) is amended by striking (A) after (3). (14) Section 2335(d) is amended— (A) by designating the last sentence of paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (B) in paragraph (3), as so designated— (i) by inserting before each of the following paragraph heading: Other terms.—. (ii) by striking the term and inserting that term; and (iii) by striking Federal Campaign and inserting Federal Election Campaign. (15) Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking section 2366a(a)(4) and inserting section 2366a(a)(6). (16) Section 2601a is amended— (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking issue and inserting prescribe; and (B) in subsection (d), by striking issued and inserting prescribed. (17) Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking can be still be and inserting can still be. (18) Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking repayed and inserting repaid. (19) Section 2884(c) is amended by striking on evaluation in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting an evaluation. (20) Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking section 1024(a) and inserting section 1018(a). (g) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 Effective as of December 23, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended as follows: (1) Section 2712 (127 Stat. 1004) is repealed. (2) Section 2809(a) (127 Stat. 1013) is amended by striking subjection and inserting subsection. (3) Section 2966 (127 Stat. 1042) is amended in the section heading by striking title and inserting administrative jurisdiction. (4) Section 2971(a) (127 Stat. 1044) is amended— (A) by striking the map and inserting the maps; and (B) by striking the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws and inserting and the mineral leasing laws. (5) Section 2972(d)(1) (127 Stat. 1045) is amended— (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting public before land; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking public. (6) Section 2977(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1047) is amended by striking ; and and inserting a period. (h) National defense authorization act for fiscal year 2013 Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 and inserting on January 2, 2013,. (i) Coordination with other amendments made by this act For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act. 1072. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities and inserting counterdrug, counterterrorism, and border security activities (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the Attorney General and the Director of National Drug Control Policy and inserting the Attorney General, the Director of National Drug Control Policy, and the Secretary of Homeland Security, as appropriate.; and (2) in subsection (d), by striking counter-drug and counter-terrorism activities and inserting counterdrug, counterterrorism, or border security activities. 1073. Revision to statute of limitations for aviation insurance claims (a) In general Section 44309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: A civil action shall not be instituted against the United States under this chapter unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim is sent by certified or registered mail.. (2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c): (c) Time requirements (1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation within two years after the date on which the loss event occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary. (2) (A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim made under the authority of this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than the earlier of— (i) the date that is 60 days after the date on which final judgment is entered by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction; or (ii) the date that is six years after the date on which the loss event occurred. (B) Any civil action arising out of the denial of such claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary. (3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6 months after the date on which the claim is presented to the Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement with the claimant when there is good cause for an agreement. . (b) Applicability The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a claim arising after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1074. Pilot program for the human terrain system (a) Pilot program required The Secretary of the Army shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary uses the Human Terrain System assets in the Pacific Command area of responsibility to support phase 0 shaping operations and the theater security cooperation plans of the Commander of the Pacific Command. (b) Limitation Not more than 12 full-time equivalent personnel, or 12 full-time equivalent personnel for reach back support, may be deployed into the Pacific command area of responsibility to support the pilot program required by subsection (a). The limitation under the preceding sentence shall not apply to training or support functions required to prepare personnel for participation in the pilot program. (c) Reports (1) Briefing Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the plan of the Secretary to carry out the program required by subsection (a), including the milestones, metrics, deliverables, and resources needed to execute such a pilot program. In establishing the metrics for the pilot program, the Secretary shall include the ability to measure the value of the program in comparison to other analytic tools and techniques. (2) Initial report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the pilot program. Such report shall include the independent analysis and recommendations of the Commander of the Pacific Command regarding the effectiveness of the program and how it could be improved. (3) Final report Not later than December 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the pilot program. Such report shall include an analysis of the comparative value of human terrain information relative to other analytic tools and techniques, recommendations regarding expanding the program to include other combatant commands, and any improvements to the program and necessary resources that would enable such an expansion. (d) Termination The authority to carry out a pilot program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2016. 1075. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace (a) Memoranda of understanding Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access nonregulatory special use airspace if such access— (1) is used by the entity as part of such test range program; and (2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the Department of Defense. (b) Established procedures The Secretary shall carry out subsection (a) using the established procedures of the Department of Defense with respect to entering into a memorandum of understanding. (c) Construction A memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team member of such entity in the test range program specified in such subsection. 1076. Sense of Congress on the life and achievements of Dr. James R. Schlesinger (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger was born in New York, New York, on February 15, 1929, graduated summa cum laude from Harvard College in 1950 where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa and awarded the Frederick Sheldon Travel Fellowship, and subsequently received from Harvard University his master’s degree in 1952 and doctoral degree in 1956. (2) Dr. Schlesinger married Rachel Line Mellinger in 1954 and had eight children with her before she passed away in 1995. (3) Dr. Schlesinger is survived by his children Cora Schlesinger, Charles Schlesinger, Ann Schlesinger, William Schlesinger, Emily Schlesinger, Thomas Schlesinger, Clara Schlesinger, and James Schlesinger, Jr., and eleven grandchildren. (4) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous patron of the arts, including helping significantly to establish the Rachel M. Schlesinger Concert Hall and Arts Center in Arlington, Virginia. (5) Dr. Schlesinger was a generous sponsor of higher education, serving on the International Council at Harvard University’s Belfer Center, endowing the Julius Schlesinger Professorship of Operations Management at New York University’s Stern School of Business and the James R. Schlesinger Distinguished Professorship at the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia, and sponsoring an ongoing music scholarship at Harvard College in honor of his beloved wife. (6) Dr. Schlesinger was a distinguished statesman-scholar of great integrity, intellect, and insight who dedicated his life to protecting the security of the United States and Western civilization and the liberty of all the people of the United States throughout his highly-decorated and distinguished career spanning seven decades— (A) serving as a professor of economics at the University of Virginia from 1955 until 1963; (B) authoring numerous important scholarly and policy-related publications, including The Political Economy of National Security: A Study of the Economic Aspect of the Contemporary Power Struggle (1960), Defense Planning and Budgeting: The Issue of Centralized Control (1968), American Security and Energy Policy (1980), America at Century’s End (1989), and most recently, Minimum Deterrence: Examining the Evidence (2013); (C) serving at the RAND Corporation from 1963 until 1969, including as the director of strategic studies; (D) beginning service in the Federal Government in 1969, leading on defense matters as the assistant director and acting deputy director of the United States Bureau of the Budget; (E) serving as a member and chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission from 1971 until 1973, working tirelessly to introduce extensive organization and management changes to strengthen the regulatory performance of the Commission; (F) serving as Director of Central Intelligence in 1973, focusing on the agency’s adherence to its legislative charter; and (G) becoming the Secretary of Defense in 1973 at age 44, a position Dr. Schlesinger held until 1975, during which time he— (i) authored the Schlesinger Doctrine that instituted important reforms to strengthen the flexibility and credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent to prevent war, assure United States allies, and protect the liberties all Americans enjoy; ensuring that the United States maintained essential equivalence with the Soviet Union’s conventional military forces and surging nuclear capabilities; (ii) lead the successful development of the A-10 close-air support aircraft and the F-16 fighter; leading the Department of Defense with great skill and prescience during the 1973 Yom Kippur War in which he was key to the United States airlift that, according to Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, meant life for our people; (iii) led the Department of Defense during the 1974 Cyprus Crisis, the closing phase of the Indochina conflict, and the 1975 Mayaguez incident in which his actions helped save the lives of captured Americans, (iv) consulted regularly with and was highly-regarded by the uniformed military; and working tenaciously to strengthen the morale of the military following the United States withdrawal from Vietnam and to stem the defense budget cuts in that challenging period. (7) In light of his realistic views of the Soviet Union’s power and intentions, Dr. Schlesinger was invited to China as a private citizen in 1975 at the personal request of Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, and upon Mao’s death, was the only foreigner invited by the Chinese leadership to lay a wreath at Mao’s bier. (8) In 1976, President-elect Jimmy Carter invited Dr. Schlesinger to serve as his special advisor on energy during the difficult period of oil embargoes and fuel shortages to establish a national energy policy and create the charter for the Department of Energy and subsequently to serve President Carter as the first Secretary of Energy, successfully initiating new conservation standards, gradual oil and natural gas deregulation, and unifying the nation’s approach to energy policy with national security considerations. (9) Following his return to private life in 1979, Dr. Schlesinger continued serving tirelessly to the end of his life in a wide array of public service and civic positions, including as a member of President Ronald Reagan’s Commission on Strategic Forces, a member of Virginia Governor Charles Robb’s Commission on Virginia’s Future, Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Mitre Corporation, a member of the Defense Policy Board and co-chair of studies for the Defense Science Board, Chairman of the National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Board, a Director of Sandia Corporation, a Trustee of the Atlantic Council, Nixon Center, and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, and an original member of the Secretary of State’s International Security Advisory Board. (10) In the recent past, Dr. Schlesinger was appointed by President George W. Bush to the Homeland Security Advisory Board, invited by Secretary Robert Gates to lead the Schlesinger Task Force to recommend measures to ensure the highest levels of competence and control of the Nation’s nuclear forces, and invited by Congress to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States to produce the 2009 study, entitled America’s Strategic Posture, which served as the blueprint for the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review of the Department of Defense. (11) In addition to Dr. Schlesinger’s earned doctorate from Harvard University, he was awarded 13 honorary doctorates, and was the recipient of numerous prestigious medals and awards, including inter alia, the National Security Medal presented by President Carter, the Defense Science Board’s Eugene G. Fubini Award, the United States Army Association’s George Catlett Marshall Medal, the Air Force Association’s H. H. Arnold Award, the Navy League’s National Meritorious Citation, the Society of Experimental Test Pilots’ James H. Doolittle Award, the Military Order of World Wars’ Distinguished Service Medal, the Air Force Association’s Lifetime Achievement Award, and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation’s Henry M. Jackson Award for Distinguished Public Service. (12) Dr. Schlesinger’s monumental contributions to the security and liberty of the nation and Western civilization, and to the betterment of his local community should serve as an example to all people of the United States. (b) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) has learned with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Dr. James R. Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy, and Director of Central Intelligence; (2) honors the legacy of Dr. Schlesinger’s commitment to the liberty and security of this Nation and the Western community of nations, the betterment of his local community, and his loving family; (3) extends its deepest condolences and sympathy to the family, friends, and colleagues of Dr. Schlesinger who have lost a beloved father, grandfather, and thoughtful leader; (4) honors Dr. Schlesinger’s wisdom, discernment, scholarship, and dedication to a life of public service that greatly benefitted his community, country, and Western civilization; (5) recognizes with great appreciation that while serving as public servant under Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter, Dr. Schlesinger contributed significantly, thoughtfully, and directly to the betterment of United States policies and practices in the areas of national defense, energy, and intelligence; (6) recognizes with great appreciation that after returning to private life, Dr. Schlesinger continued to serve the Nation selflessly until his passing through his numerous bipartisan contributions to the reasoned public discourse of issues and his leadership on numerous high-level studies sponsored by the White House, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the United States Congress; (7) recognizes with great appreciation Dr. Schlesinger’s exemplary life guided by his commitment to the continuing security and liberty of the United States, and by his honor, duty, and devotion to country and family, scholarship, and personal moral integrity; and (8) expresses profound respect and admiration for Dr. Schlesinger and his exemplary legacy of commitment to the people of the United States, members of the Armed Forces, and all those who help safeguard the Nation. 1077. Reform of quadrennial defense review (a) In general (1) Reform Section 118 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 118. Defense Strategy Review (a) Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends Report (1) Report required Each year following a year evenly divisible by four, on the date on which the President submits the budget for the next fiscal year to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report (to be known as the Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends Report) on United States national security interests and threats and trends that could affect those interests. The report shall be developed in full consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2) Timeframes The report shall consider the following three general timeframes: (A) Near-term (5 years). (B) Mid-term (10 to 15 years). (C) Far-term (20 years). (3) Contents of the report (A) The report required under this subsection shall include a discussion of United States national security interests consistent with the President’s most recently submitted National Security Strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043). (B) The report required under this subsection shall include a discussion of the current and future security environment, including assessed threats, trends, and possible developments that could affect the national security interests of the United States. Such areas of discussion shall include, at a minimum— (i) geopolitical changes; (ii) military capabilities; (iii) technology developments; (iv) demographic changes; and (v) other trends the Secretary considers to be significant. (C) The report required under this subsection shall include a list of current and possible future threats to United States national security interests. The threats included in the list shall be categorized by their likelihood, imminence, and potential severity, and shall include only those threats the Department of Defense would likely have a role in preventing, combating, or otherwise addressing. (4) Form The report required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (b) National Defense Panel (1) Establishment Not later than February 1 of a year following a year evenly divisible by four, there shall be established an independent panel to be known as the National Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the Panel). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this subsection. (2) Membership The Panel shall be composed of ten members from private civilian life who are recognized experts in matters relating to the national security of the United States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows: (A) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (B) Two by the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. (C) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (D) Two by the ranking member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. (3) Co-chairs of the panel In addition to the members appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as co-chairs of the panel. (4) Period of appointment; vacancies Members shall be appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (5) Duties (A) Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends Report The Panel shall have the following duties with respect to a quadrennial national security threats and trends report submitted under subsection (a): (i) Review the report and suggest additional threats, trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges that should be addressed in the Defense Strategy Review required under subsection (c). (ii) Discuss the role of the United States in the world, with particular attention to the role of the United States military and the Department of Defense, including a prioritized list of United States national security interests. (iii) Outline a defense strategy to address the threats, trends, developments, opportunities, and challenges suggested under clause (i), in particular discussing prioritized ends and ways and means to address the threats so outlined. (iv) Determine the kind and degree of risk that is acceptable to the United States in undertaking the various military missions under the strategy outlined in clause (iii) and discuss ways of mitigating such risk. (v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it considers appropriate for their consideration. (B) Defense Strategy Review The Panel shall have the following duties with respect to a Defense Strategy Review conducted under subsection (c): (i) Assess the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (c)(3). (ii) Assess the assumptions, strategy, findings, and risks of the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted under subsection (c)(3). (iii) Consider alternative defense strategies. (iv) Consider alternatives in force structure and capabilities, presence, infrastructure, readiness, personnel composition and skillsets, organizational structures, budget plans, and other elements of the defense program of the United States to execute successfully the full range of missions called for in the Defense Strategy Review and in the alternative strategies considered under clause (iii). (v) Provide to Congress and the Secretary of Defense, in the report required by paragraph (7), any recommendations it considers appropriate for their consideration. (6) First meeting If the Secretary of Defense has not made the Secretary’s appointments to the Panel under paragraph (3) by March 1 of a year in which a quadrennial national security threats and trends report is submitted under this section, the Panel shall convene for its first meeting with the remaining members. (7) Reports (A) Not later than July 1 of a year in which a Panel is established under paragraph (1), the Panel shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Panel’s review of the quadrennial national security threats and trends report, as required by paragraph (5)(A). (B) Not later than three months after the date on which the report on a Defense Strategy Review is submitted under subsection (c), the Panel shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Panel’s assessment of such Defense Strategy Review, as required by paragraph (5)(B). (8) Administrative provisions (A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of Defense and any of its components such information as the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly provided to the maximum extent practical. (B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any federally funded research and development center that is covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of Defense. (C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the conditions set forth in such section. (D) Funds for activities of the Panel shall be provided from amounts available to the Department of Defense. (9) Termination A Panel established under paragraph (1) shall terminate 45 days after the date on which the Panel submits its report on a Defense Strategy Review under paragraph (7)(B). (c) Defense Strategy Review (1) Review required The Secretary of Defense shall every four years, during a year following a year evenly divisible by four, conduct a comprehensive examination (to be known as a Defense Strategy Review) of the national defense strategy, force structure, force modernization plans, infrastructure, budget plan, and other elements of the defense program and policies of the United States with a view toward determining and expressing the defense strategy of the United States and establishing a defense program. Each such Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2) Conduct of review Each Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted so as to— (A) delineate a national defense strategy consistent with the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043); (B) provide the mechanism for— (i) setting priorities, shaping the force, guiding capabilities and resources, and adjusting the organization of the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the strategic environment; (ii) ensuring that entities within the Department of Defense are working toward common goals; and (iii) engaging Congress, other United States Government stakeholders, allies and partners, and the private sector on such strategy; (C) provide a bridge between higher-level policy and strategy and other Department of Defense guidance and activities; (D) consider three general timeframes of the near-term (associated with the future-years defense program), mid-term (10 to 15 years), and far-term (20 years); (E) address the security environment, threats, trends, opportunities, and challenges; (F) define the force structure and capabilities, force modernization plans, presence, infrastructure, readiness, personnel composition and skillsets, organizational structures, and other elements of the defense program of the United States associated with that national defense strategy that would be required to execute successfully the full range of missions called for in that national defense strategy; (G) identify the budget plan that would be required to provide sufficient resources to execute successfully the full range of missions called for in that national defense strategy; (H) define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and operational risks associated with executing the national defense strategy; and (I) understand the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and resources. (3) Submission of report on defense strategy review to congressional committees The Secretary shall submit a report on each Defense Strategy Review to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The report shall be submitted not later than March 1 of the year following the year in which the review is conducted. If the year in which the review is conducted is in the second term of a President, the Secretary may submit an update to the Defense Strategy Review report submitted during the first term of that President. (4) Elements The report shall provide a comprehensive discussion of the Review, including the following: (A) The national defense strategy of the United States. (B) The assumed or defined prioritized national security interests of the United States that inform the national defense strategy defined in the Review. (C) The assumed strategic environment, including the threats, developments, trends, opportunities, and challenges that affect the assumed or defined national security interests of the United States, including those that were examined for the purposes of the Review and those that were considered in the development of the Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends Report required under subsection (a). (D) The assumed steady state activities, crisis and conflict scenarios, military end states, and force planning construct examined in the review. (E) The prioritized missions of the armed forces under the strategy and a discussion of the roles and missions of the components of the armed forces to carry out those missions. (F) The assumed roles and capabilities provided by other United States Government agencies and by allies and partners. (F) The force structure and capabilities, presence, infrastructure, readiness, personnel composition and skillsets, organizational structures, and other elements of the defense program that would be required to execute successfully the full range of missions called for in the strategy. (G) An assessment of the gaps and shortfalls between the force structure, capabilities, and additional elements as required by subparagraph (F) and the current elements in the Department’s existing program of record, and a prioritization of those gaps and shortfalls. (H) An assessment of the risks assumed by the strategy, including— (i) how the Department defines, categorizes, and measures risk, such as strategic and operational risk; and (ii) the plan for mitigating major identified risks, including the expected timelines for, and extent of, any such mitigation, and the rationale for where greater risk is accepted. (I) A sensitivity analysis, specifically to understand the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and resources. (J) Any other key assumptions and elements addressed in the review or that the Secretary considers necessary to include. (5) CJCS Review (A) Upon the completion of each Review under this subsection, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense the Chairman’s assessment of risks under the defense strategy developed by the Review and a description of the capabilities needed to address such risk. In preparing such assessment, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall consider the threats and trends contained in the Quadrennial National Security Threats and Trends Report required by subsection (a), any additional threats considered as part of the Review under this subsection (particularly those that are categorized as likely, imminent, or severe), and any additional threats the Chairman considers appropriate. (B) The Chairman’s assessment shall be submitted to the Secretary in time for the inclusion of the assessment in the report on the Review under this subsection. The Secretary shall include the Chairman’s assessment, together with the Secretary’s comments, in the report in its entirety. (6) Form The report required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. . (2) Clerical amendment The item relating to section 118 at the beginning of chapter 2 of such title is amended to read as follows: 118. Defense Strategy Review. . (b) Repeal of quadrennial roles and missions review (1) Repeal Chapter 2 of such title is amended by striking section 118b. (2) Conforming amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 118b. (c) Effective date Section 118 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect on October 1, 2015. 1078. Resubmission of 2014 quadrennial defense review (a) Requirement to resubmit 2014 QDR Not later than October 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall, in accordance with this section, resubmit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the report on the 2014 quadrennial defense review that was submitted to such committees as required by section 118(d) of title 10, United States Code, (b) Matters covered The resubmitted report shall fully address the elements required in subsections (a), (b)(3), and (b)(4) of section 118 of such title, which specifically include the following: (1) An articulation of a defense program for the next 20 years, consistent with the national defense strategy of the United States determined and expressed in the 2014 quadrennial defense review. (2) An identification of (A) the budget plan that would be required to provide sufficient resources to execute successfully the full range of missions called for in that national defense strategy at a low-to-moderate level of risk, and (B) any additional resources (beyond those programmed in the current future-years defense program) required to achieve such a level of risk. (3) Recommendations that are not constrained to comply with and are fully independent of the budget submitted to Congress by the President pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. (c) Limitation on Funds Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense resubmits to the congressional defense committees the 2014 quadrennial defense report in accordance with this section. 1079. Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive devices It is the sense of Congress that— (1) counter-improvised explosive device tactics, techniques, and procedures used in Iraq and Afghanistan have produced important technical data, lessons learned, and enduring technology critical to mitigating the devastating effects of improvised explosive devices, which have been the leading cause of combat fatalities in the United States Central Command area of operations since 2002, and whose use are now expanding to other Global Combatant Commands area of operations; (2) without the preservation of knowledge about counter-improvised explosive devices, the Nation could fail to take full advantage of the hard earned lessons and investments of the past decade of counter-improvised explosive device operations to enhance warfighter readiness; and (3) the Department of Defense should remain dedicated to retaining a knowledge base relating to counter-improvised explosive devices to ensure lessons learned and investments are maximized for future benefits. 1080. Enhancing presence and capabilities and readiness posture of United States military in Europe Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan that— (1) identifies the capabilities and capacities, including with respect to cyber, special operations, and intelligence, required by the Armed Forces of the United States to counter or mitigate conventional, unconventional, and subversive activities of the Russian Federation within the area of responsibility of the United States European Command; (2) identifies the required capabilities and capacities needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to meet operations plan requirements for a response under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty; (3) identifies any deficiencies in the readiness of the Armed Forces of the United States in the area of the responsibility of the United States European Command; and (4) recommends actions, resources, and timelines with respect to correcting any deficiency identified under paragraphs (1), (2), or (3). 1081. Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by the Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States (a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with respect to the Member, officer, or employee; (2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip involved, provide a written statement of the cost— (A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved, and (B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and (3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary’s official public website until the expiration of the 4-year period which begins on the final day of the trip involved. (b) Exceptions This section does not apply with respect to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Member The term Member, with respect to the House of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress. (2) United States The term United States means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States. (d) Effective Date This section shall apply with respect to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to any trip which began prior to such date. XI Civilian Personnel Matters 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas Effective January 1, 2015, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking through 2014 and inserting through 2015. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking 2015 and inserting 2016. 1103. Revision to list of Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories Section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2487; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: (18) The Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (19) The Space and Missile Defense Command Technical Center. . 1104. Permanent authority for experimental personnel program for scientific and technical personnel (a) In general Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by striking subsections (e), (f) and (g). (b) Conforming amendments Such section is further amended— (1) in the section heading, by striking Experimental and inserting Alternative; (2) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking During the program period specified in subsection (e)(1), the and inserting The; and (B) by striking experimental; and (3) in subsection (d)(1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 12-month period and inserting calendar year; and (B) in subparagraph (A), striking fiscal year and inserting calendar year. 1105. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: (3) Students enrolled in scientific and engineering programs The director of any STRL may appoint qualified candidates enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate instruction leading to a bachelor’s or master’s degree in a scientific, technical, engineering or mathematical course of study at an institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 and 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to positions described in paragraph (3) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title). ; (2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following: (3) Candidates enrolled in scientific and engineering programs The positions described in this paragraph are scientific and engineering positions that may be temporary or term in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory. ; and (3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following: (3) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection (b)(3), with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(3), the number equal to 5 percent of the total number of scientific and engineering positions in such laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year. . 1106. Judicial review of Merit Systems Protection Board decisions relating to whistleblowers (a) In general Section 7703(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking 2-year and inserting 5-year. (b) Director appeal Section 7703(d)(2) of such title is amended by striking 2-year and inserting 5-year. XII Matters relating to foreign nations A Assistance and training 1201. One-year extension of Global Security Contingency Fund (a) Revisions to Global Security Contingency Fund Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking the provision of equipment, supplies, and training. and inserting the following: the provision of the following: (A) Equipment. (B) Supplies. (C) With respect to amounts in the Fund appropriated or transferred into the Fund after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, small-scale construction not exceeding $750,000 on a per-project basis. (D) Training. . (b) Availability of funds Subsection (i) of such section is amended— (1) by striking Amounts and inserting the following: (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), amounts ; (2) by striking September 30, 2015 and inserting September 30, 2016; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (2) Exception Amounts appropriated or transferred to the Fund before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall remain available for obligation and expenditure after September 30, 2015, only for activities under programs commenced under subsection (b) before September 30, 2015. . (c) Expiration Subsection (p) of such section, as amended by section 1202(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894), is further amended— (1) by striking September 30, 2015 and inserting September 30, 2016; (2) by striking fiscal years 2012 through 2015 and inserting fiscal years 2012 through 2016; and (3) by adding at the end before the period the following: and subject to the requirements contained in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (i). 1202. Notice to Congress on certain assistance under authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction Section 1204(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 896; 10 U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by inserting after congressional defense committees the following: and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1203. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign military liaison officers of foreign countries while assigned to the Department of Defense (a) Eligibility Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking involved in a military operation and all that follows and inserting while such liaison officer is assigned temporarily to the headquarters of a combatant command, component command, or subordinate operational command of the United States.. (b) Limitations Such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Limitations The number of liaison officers supported under subsection (b)(1) may not exceed 60 at any one time, and the amount of unreimbursed support for any such liaison officer under that subsection in any fiscal year may not exceed $200,000 (in fiscal year 2014 constant dollars). . (c) Secretary of state concurrence Such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection (d), as added by subsection (b)(2) of this section, the following new subsection (e): (e) Secretary of state concurrence The authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide administrative services and support under subsection (a) for the performance of duties by a liaison officer of another nation may be exercised only with respect to a liaison officer of another nation whose assignment as described in that subsection is accepted by the Secretary of Defense with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. . (d) Definition Subsection (f) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (d)(1) of this section, is further amended by inserting training programs conducted to familiarize, orient, or certify liaison officers regarding unique aspects of the assignments of the liaison officers, after police protection,. (e) Annual report (1) In general Not later January 31, 2016, January 31, 2017, and January 31, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a summary of the expenses, by command and associated countries, incurred by the United States for those liaison officers of a developing country in connection with the assignment of that officer as described in subsection (a) of section 1051(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section. (2) Definition The report required by paragraph (1) shall also include the definition of and criteria established to designate a country as a developing country for purposes of such paragraph. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. 1204. Annual report on human rights vetting and verification procedures of the Department of Defense (a) Report required The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees for each of the fiscal years 2015 through 2019 a report on human rights vetting and verification procedures used to comply with the requirements of section 8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76) or any successor requirements. (b) Matters to be included The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An accounting and description of all training, equipment, or other assistance that was approved or provided to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year for which such vetting and verification procedures were required, itemized by country and event. (2) An accounting and description of all training, equipment, or other assistance that was not approved or provided to foreign security forces for the prior fiscal year by reason of not complying with such vetting and verification procedures, itemized by country and event, including the reasons for such non-compliance. (3) A description of any human rights, rule of law training, or other assistance that was provided to foreign security forces described in paragraph (2) for the prior fiscal year for purposes of seeking to comply with such vetting and verification procedures in the future, itemized by country and event. (4) A description of any interagency processes that were used to evaluate compliance with the requirements of section 8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any successor requirements. (5) In the event the Secretary of Defense exercises the authority under subsection (b) or (c) of section 8057 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 or any successor authority, a justification for the exercise of such authority and an explanation of the specific benefits derived from the exercise of such authority. (6) Any additional items the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate. (c) Submission requirements (1) In general The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted to the appropriate congressional committees at the same time as the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code. (2) Form The report shall be submitted in unclassified form and may include a classified annex if necessary. (d) Definition In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. B Matters relating to Afghanistan and Pakistan 1211. Extension of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (a) One year extension Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 904), is further amended by striking fiscal year 2014 each place it appears and inserting fiscal year 2015. (b) Funds available during fiscal year 2015 Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking for operation and maintenance and inserting by section 1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 1212. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (a) Extension of authority Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended by striking fiscal year 2014 for overseas contingency operations and inserting by section 1503 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. (b) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking September 30, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2015. (c) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan Subsection (d) of section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2000) is amended— (1) in the subsection heading, by striking in fiscal year 2013; and (2) in paragraph (1), by striking Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, and all that follows through remain available for obligation and inserting No amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 or any prior fiscal year. 1213. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces (a) Logistical support for coalition forces supporting United States military operations in Afghanistan Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1217(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking fiscal year 2014 and inserting fiscal year 2015; (2) in subsection (d), by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015; and (3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015 . (b) Use of acquisition and cross-Servicing agreements To lend certain military equipment to certain foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability Section 1202(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most recently amended by section 1217(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015. 1214. Report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan under Operation Resolute Support (a) Report required Not later than April 1, 2015, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) Operation Resolute Support. (b) Matters to be included: strategic direction of united states activities relating to security and stability in afghanistan under operation resolute support The report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the mission and a comprehensive strategy of the United States for security and stability in Afghanistan during Operation Resolute Support, including any changes to the mission and strategy over time. The description of such strategy shall consist of a general overview and a separate detailed section for each of the following: (1) NATO The status of the train, advise, and assist mission under NATO’s Operation Resolute Support. (2) ANSF A description of the following: (A) The strategy and budget, with defined objectives, for activities relating to strengthening and sustaining the resources, capabilities, and effectiveness of the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), with the goal of ensuring that a strong and fully-capable ANSF is able to independently and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and stability in Afghanistan by the end of Operation Resolute Support. (B) Any actions of the United States and the Government of Afghanistan to achieve the following goals relating to sustaining the capacity of the ANSF and the results of such actions: (i) Improve and sustain ANSF recruitment and retention, including through vetting and salaries for the ANSF. (ii) Improve and sustain ANSF training and mentoring. (iii) Strengthen the partnership between the Government of the United States and the Government of Afghanistan. (iv) Ensure international commitments to support the ANSF. (3) NATO bases in Afghanistan A description of the following: (A) The access arrangements, the specific locations, and the force protection requirements for bases that the United States has access to in Afghanistan. (B) A summary of attacks against NATO bases or facilities and any challenges to force protection, such as green-on-blue attacks. (4) Public corruption and rule of law A description of any actions, and the results of such actions, by the United States, NATO, and the Government of Afghanistan to fight public corruption and strengthen governance and the rule of law at the local, provincial, and national levels. (5) Regional considerations A description of any actions by the Government of Afghanistan to increase cooperation with countries geographically located around Afghanistan’s border, with a particular focus on improving security and stability in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border areas, and the status of such actions. (c) Matters to be included: performance indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled requirements toward sustainable long-term security and stability in afghanistan under operation resolute support (1) In general The report required under subsection (a) shall set forth a comprehensive set of performance indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled requirements toward sustainable long-term security and stability in Afghanistan, as specified in paragraph (2), and shall include performance standards and goals, together with a notional timetable for achieving such goals. (2) Performance indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled requirements specified The performance indicators, measures of progress, and any unfulfilled requirements specified in this paragraph shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) An assessment of NATO train, advise, and assist mission requirements. Such assessments shall include— (i) indicators of the efficacy of the train, advise, and assist mission, such as number of engagements with the ANSF per day, a description of the engagements with the ANSF, and trends in the marginal improvements in the functional areas of the ANSF support structure from the tactical to the ministerial level; (ii) contractor support requirements for the train, advise, and assist mission and for the ANSF; and (iii) any unfulfilled requirements. (B) For the ANA, and separately for the ANP, an assessment and any changes over time for the following: (i) Recruitment and retention numbers, rates of absenteeism, rates and overall number of any desertions, ANSF vetting procedures, and salary scale. (ii) Numbers ANSF being trained and the type of training and mentoring. (iii) Operational readiness status of ANSF units, including any changes to the type, number, size, and organizational structure of ANA and ANP units. (iv) A description of any gaps in ANSF capacity and capability. (v) Effectiveness of ANA and ANP senior officers and the ANA and ANP chain of command. (vi) An assessment of the extent to which insurgents have infiltrated the ANA and ANP. (vii) An assessment of the ANSF’s ability to hold terrain in Afghanistan and any posture changes in the ANSF such that they no longer are providing coverage of certain areas in Afghanistan that the ANSF was providing coverage of prior to the reporting period. (C) An assessment of the relative strength of the insurgency in Afghanistan and the extent to which it is utilizing weapons or weapons-related materials from countries other than Afghanistan. (D) A description of all terrorist and insurgent groups operating in Afghanistan, including the number, size, equipment strength, military effectiveness, and sources of support. (E) An assessment of security and stability, including terrorist and insurgent activity, in Afghanistan-Pakistan border areas and in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas from groups, including, al-Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, and the Quetta Shura Taliban, and any attacks on NATO supply lines. (F) A description of the counterterrorism mission and an assessment of the counterterrorism campaign within Operation Resolute Support, including— (i) the ability of NATO and the ANSF to detain individuals for intelligence purposes and to prevent high-value detainees from returning to the battlefield; and (ii) an assessment of whether the Government of Afghanistan is partnering effectively and conducting operations based on NATO intelligence information. (G) An assessment of United States military requirements for the NATO train, advise, and assist mission, counterterrorism, and force protection requirements under Operation Resolute Support, including planned personnel rotations and the associated time period of deployment for the 1-year period beginning on the date of the submission of the report required under subsection (a). (d) Form The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex, if necessary. (e) Congressional briefings The Secretary of Defense shall supplement the report required under subsection (a) with regular briefings to the appropriate congressional committees on the subject matter of the report. (f) Three-month extension of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan Section 1230(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended by section 1218(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1632), is further amended by striking the end of fiscal year 2014 and inserting December 31, 2014. (g) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1215. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 150 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan (a) Requirement to withhold assistance to Afghanistan An amount equivalent to 150 percent of the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance in violation of the status of forces agreement between the United States and Afghanistan (entered in force May 28, 2003) shall be withheld by the Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2015 to the extent that the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the appropriate congressional committees that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned. (b) Waiver authority The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in Afghanistan. (c) Report Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2014 by the Government of Afghanistan on any Department of Defense assistance. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Department of Defense assistance The term Department of Defense assistance means funds provided in a fiscal year to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors. (e) Termination This section shall terminate at the close of the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees a notification that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement and such agreement has entered into force. 1216. United States plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces through the end of fiscal year 2018 (a) Plan required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end of fiscal year 2018, with the objective of ensuring that a strong and fully-capable ANSF will be able to independently and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and stability in Afghanistan. (b) Matters to be included The plan contained in the report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following matters: (1) A comprehensive and effective strategy and budget, with defined objectives. (2) A description of the commitment for contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO nations, including the plan to achieve such commitments for the ANSF. (3) A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training, and services provided for the ANSF by the United States, countries participating in NATO, and other coalition forces that are not part of Operation Resolute Support. (4) Any actions to assist the Government of Afghanistan or on its behalf to achieve the following goals and the results of such actions: (A) Improve and sustain effective Afghan security institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff, including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting units. (B) Any additional train and equip efforts, including for the Afghan Air Force, as necessary, and Afghan Special Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of conducting operations independently and in sufficient numbers. (C) Establish strong ANSF-readiness assessment tools and metrics. (D) Improve and sustain strong, professional ANSF officers at the junior-, mid-, and senior-levels (E) Further strong ANSF communication and control between central command and regions, provinces, and districts. (F) Develop and improve mechanisms for incorporating lessons learned and best practices into ANSF operations. (G) Improve ANSF oversight mechanisms, including a strong record-keeping system to track ANSF equipment and personnel. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1217. Sense of Congress on United States military commitment to Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States continues to have vital national security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan remains a stable, sovereign country and that groups like Al Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, and the Quetta Shura Taliban are not able to use Afghanistan as a safe haven from which to launch attacks; (2) the United States should have a residual presence in Afghanistan to train, advise, and assist the ANSF, conduct counterterrorism operations, and support force protection requirements in order to maintain the gains achieved in Afghanistan; (3) it is in the interests of both the United States and Afghanistan to sign the Bilateral Security Agreement as soon as practicable after the new President of Afghanistan is sworn in; (4) the United States should provide financial, advisory, and other necessary support to the ANSF, at the authorized end-strength of 352,000 personnel, through 2018; (5) the train, advise, and assist mission, following the end of the NATO mission on December 31, 2014, should be able to assist the ANSF in all parts of Afghanistan; (6) uncertainty with the signing of the Bilateral Security Agreement with Afghanistan is threatening the gains achieved by the United States and coalition forces and the United States’ enduring vital national security interests in Afghanistan and the region; (7) the President should announce the United States residual presence for Operation Resolute Support to reassure the people of Afghanistan and to provide a tangible statement of support for the future of Afghanistan; (8) the United States should aggressively work with NATO and the Government of Afghanistan to achieve a status of forces agreement for NATO forces in support of the post-2014 mission; and (9) NATO member countries pledged their support and long-term commitment to Afghanistan at the Lisbon, Chicago, and Tokyo conferences and should honor their commitments to Afghanistan and the ANSF. 1218. Extension of Afghan special immigrant program Section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: (E) Fiscal year 2015 (i) In general Except as provided in subparagraph (D), for fiscal year 2015, the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section may not exceed 1,080. For purposes of status provided under this subparagraph— (I) the period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must terminate on or before December 31, 2015; (II) the principal alien seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than September 30, 2015; and (III) the authority to provide such status shall terminate on September 30, 2016. (ii) Construction Clause (i) shall not be construed to affect numerical limitations, or the terms for provision of status, under subparagraph (D). . C Matters relating to the Russian Federation 1221. Limitation on military contact and cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that— (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory; (2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of all Ukrainian territory; (3) the Russian Federation is no longer taking actions that are inconsistent with the INF Treaty; (4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations; and (5) the Russian Federation has not sold or otherwise transferred the Club-K land attack cruise missile system to any foreign country or foreign person during fiscal year 2014. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) with respect to a certification requirement specified in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) if— (1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States and a description of the national security interest covered by the waiver; and (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot make the certification under subsection (a); and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the report under subparagraph (B). (c) Additional waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation required by subsection (a)(5) with respect to the sale or other transfer of the Club-K land attack cruise missile system if— (1) the United States has imposed sanctions against the manufacturer of such system by reason of such sale or other transfer; or (2) the Secretary has developed and submitted to the appropriate congressional committees a plan to prevent the sale or other transfer of such system in the future. (d) Exception for certain military bases The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation The term bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation— (A) means— (i) reciprocal visits and meetings by high-ranking delegations; (ii) information sharing, policy consultations, security dialogues or other forms of consultative discussions; (iii) exchanges of military instructors, training personnel, and students; (iv) exchanges of information; (v) defense planning; and (vi) military training or exercises; but (B) does not include any contact or cooperation that is in support of United States stability operations. (3) CFE Treaty The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992. (4) INF Treaty The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988. (f) Effective date This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of such date of enactment. 1222. Limitation on use of funds with respect to certification of certain flights by the Russian Federation under the Treaty on Open Skies (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act may be used to authorize or permit a certification by the United States of a proposal by the Russian Federation to change any sensor package of an aircraft for a flight by the Russian Federation under the Open Skies Treaty, unless— (1) the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of National Intelligence jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that such proposal will not enhance the capability or potential of the Russian Federation to gather intelligence that poses an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or is not designed to be collected under such Treaty; and (2) the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that— (A) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory; (B) the Russian Federation is no longer violating the INF Treaty; and (C) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations. (b) Waiver The President may waive the requirement of the Secretary of State to make a certification described in subsection (a)(2) with respect to a proposal by the Russian Federation if the President determines that it is in the national security interests of the United States to do so and submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the reasons for such determination. (c) Notice and wait requirement The President may not authorize or permit a certification by the United States for which the certifications required by paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) are made until the expiration of a 90-day period beginning on the date on which the certification required by such paragraph (1) or the certification required by such paragraph (2) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees, whichever occurs later. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (C) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) CFE Treaty The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992. (3) INF Treaty The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988. (4) Open Skies Treaty The term Open Skies Treaty means the Treaty on Open Skies, done at Helsinki March 24, 1992, and entered into force January 1, 2002. 1223. Limitations on providing certain missile defense information to the Russian Federation (a) In general Section 1246(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 923) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking 2016 and inserting 2017; (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after 2014 the following: or 2015; and (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives after congressional defense committees. (b) Limitations on providing other information No funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2017 for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Government of the Russian Federation or any Russian person with information relating to the velocity at burnout of United States missile defense interceptors or missile defense targets or related information. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds to transfer missile defense information to the Russian Federation (a) In general None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 or any subsequent fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to transfer missile defense information to the Russian Federation unless, with respect to such fiscal year, the President submits to the congressional defense committees not later than October 31 of such fiscal year a report on discussions between the Russian Federation and the United States on missile defense matters during the immediately preceding fiscal year, including any discussions for cooperation between the two countries on missile defense matters. (b) Fiscal year 2015 report The report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) with respect to fiscal year 2015 shall, in addition to including the information described in subsection (a) with respect to fiscal year 2014, include the information described in subsection (a) with respect to fiscal years 2007 through 2013. 1225. Report on non-compliance by the Russian Federation of its obligations under the INF Treaty (a) Findings Congress finds that— (1) the Russian Federation is in material breach of its obligations under the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988; and (2) such behavior poses a threat to the United States, its deployed forces, and its allies. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the President should hold the Russian Federation accountable for being in material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty; (2) the President should demand the Russian Federation completely and verifiably eliminate the military systems that constitute the material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty; (3) the President should seriously consider not engaging in further reductions of United States nuclear forces generally and should seriously consider not engaging in nuclear arms reduction negotiations with the Russian Federation specifically until such complete and verifiable elimination of the military systems has occurred; and (4) the President, in consultation with United States allies, should consider whether it is in the national security interests of the United States to unilaterally remain a party to the INF Treaty if the Russian Federation is still in material breach of the INF Treaty beginning one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an unclassified report that includes the following: (1) The status of the President’s efforts, in cooperation with United States allies, to hold the Russian Federation accountable for being in material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty and obtain the complete and verifiable elimination of its military systems that constitute the material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty. (2) The President’s assessment as to whether it remains in the national security interests of the United States to remain a party to the INF Treaty, and other related treaties and agreements, while the Russian Federation is in material breach of its obligations under the INF Treaty. (d) Appropriate congressional committees In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (3) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 1226. Sense of Congress regarding Russian aggression toward Ukraine It is the sense of the Congress that— (1) the continuing and long-standing pattern and practice by the Government of the Russian Federation of physical, diplomatic, and economic aggression toward neighboring countries is clearly intended to exert undue influence on the free will of sovereign nations and peoples to determine their own future; (2) the Russian military build-up and aggressive posture on the eastern border of Ukraine represent a deliberate intent to intimidate Ukraine and to force its citizens to submit to Russian control; (3) the Russian Federation should immediately cease all improper and illegal activities in Ukraine; (4) the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, which was executed jointly with the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom, represents a commitment to respect the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity and borders of Ukraine, and Russian actions clearly violate the commitment made by the Russian Federation in that memorandum; (5) the security cooperation with the Ukrainian military by the United States military is an important opportunity to support the continued professionalization of the Ukrainian military; (6) an enhanced military presence and readiness posture of the United States military in Europe is key to deterring further Russian aggression and assuring allies and partners; and (7) the treaty commitments under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty signed at Washington, April 4, 1949, and entered into force August 24, 1949, are important and a cornerstone to international security. 1227. Annual report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation (a) Report Not later than June 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the current and future military power of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as Russia). The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development of Russian security strategy and military strategy, and military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-year period following submission of such report. (b) Matters to be included A report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the security situation in regions neighboring Russia. (2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy and military strategy. (3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with, the goals described in paragraph (2). (4) An assessment of Russia’s global and regional security objectives, including objectives that would affect NATO, the Middle East, and the People’s Republic of China. (5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land, sea, and air forces. (6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training. (7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems. (8) Developments in Russia’s asymmetric capabilities, including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy cyber warfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and associated activities originating or suspected of originating from Russia. (9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional activities, the involvement of military and civilian organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies that would enhance Russian military capabilities. (10) Developments in Russia’s nuclear program, including the size and state of Russia’s stockpile, its nuclear strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military production capacities, and projections of its future arsenals. (11) A description of Russia’s anti-access and area denial capabilities. (12) A description of Russia’s command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for Russia’s precision guided weapons. (13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters. (14) The current state of United States military-to-military contacts with the Russian Federation armed forces, which shall include the following: (A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy. (B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts during the one-year period preceding the report, including a summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the Russian participants in those contacts. (C) A description of such military-to-military contacts scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and the plan for future contacts. (D) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the Russians expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts. (E) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts. (F) The Secretary’s assessment of how such military-to-military contacts fit into the larger security relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation. (15) A description of Russian military-to-military relationships with other countries, including the size and activity of military attache offices around the world and military education programs conducted in Russia for other countries or in other countries for the Russians. (16) Other military and security developments involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to United States national security. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (d) Repeal of superseded authority Section 10 of the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–95) is repealed. (e) Sunset This section shall terminate on June 1, 2021. D Matters relating to the Asia-Pacific region 1231. Strategy to prioritize United States interests in the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility and implementation plan (a) Strategy (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies specified in paragraph (4), shall develop a strategy to prioritize United States interests in the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. (2) Matters to be included The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall address the following: (A) Strengthening bilateral security alliances. (B) Improving relationships with countries that are emerging powers. (C) Engaging with regional multilateral institutions. (D) Expanding trade and investment. (E) Bolstering a capable military presence. (F) Promoting democracy and human rights. (G) Coordinating efforts to counter transnational threats. (H) Maintaining a rules-based structure. (I) Improving the current and future security environment. (J) Prioritizing United States military and diplomatic missions within respective Federal department or agency planning and budgeting guidance. (K) Coordinating a response framework to prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies. (L) Prioritizing security cooperation initiatives, including military-to-military and military-to-civilian engagements. (3) Asia rebalancing strategy The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall be informed by the results of the integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76)). (4) Federal departments and agencies specified The Federal departments and agencies specified in this paragraph are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Commerce, the Department of the Interior, the Office of the United States Trade Representative, and any other relevant department or agency as specified by the Secretary of Defense. (b) Implementation plan (1) In general The President, acting through the National Security Council and in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall develop an implementation plan for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and each Federal department and agency specified in subsection (a)(4) to support the strategy required by subsection (a). The implementation plan shall provide specific goals and areas of focus for each department and agency to prioritize funding in its annual budget submissions. (2) Relation to agency priority goals and annual budget (A) Agency priority goals In identifying agency priority goals under section 1120(b) of title 31, United States Code, for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and each Federal department and agency specified in subsection (a)(4), the President, acting through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall take into consideration the strategy required by subsection (a) and the implementation plan of the department or agency required by paragraph (1). (B) Annual budget The President, acting through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, includes a separate section that clearly highlights programs and projects that are being funded in the annual budget that relate to the strategy required by subsection (a) and the implementation plan of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and each Federal department and agency specified in subsection (a)(4). (c) Report (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the National Security Council, shall submit to Congress a report than contains the strategy required by subsection (a) and each implementation plan required by subsection (b). (2) Form The report shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex if necessary. 1232. Modifications to annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China (a) Matters To be included Subsection (b) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (10) through (20) as paragraphs (11) through (21), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following: (10) The developments in maritime law enforcement capabilities and organization of the People’s Republic of China, focusing on activities in contested maritime areas in the South China Sea and East China Sea. Such analyses shall include an assessment of the nature of China’s maritime law enforcement activities directed against United States allies and partners. Such maritime activities shall include activities originating or suspect of originating from China and shall include government and nongovernment activities that are believed to be sanctioned or supported by the Chinese government. . (b) Effective Date The amendments made by this section take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as so amended, on or after that date. 1233. Report on goals and objectives guiding military engagement with Burma (a) Report required Not later than December 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the goals and objectives guiding military-to-military engagement between the United States and the Union of Burma. (b) Matters to be included The report required under subsection (a) shall include— (1) a description of the specific goals and objectives of the United States that military-to-military engagement between the United States and Burma would facilitate; (2) a description of how the United States measures progress toward such goals and objectives, and the implications of failing to achieve such goals and objectives; (3) a description of the specific military-to-military engagement activities between the United States and Burma conducted during the period beginning on March 1, 2011, and ending on the close of the day before the date of the submission of the report, and of any planned military-to-military engagement activities between the United States and Burma that will be conducted during the period beginning on the date of the submission of the report and ending on the close of February 29, 2020, including descriptions of associated goals and objectives, estimated costs, timeframes, and United States military organizations or personnel involved; (4) a description and assessment of the political, military, economic, and civil society reforms being undertaken by the Government of Burma, including— (A) protecting the individual freedoms and human rights of the Burmese people, including for all ethnic and religious minorities and internally displaced populations; (B) establishing civilian control of the armed forces; (C) implementing constitutional and electoral reforms; (D) allowing access to all areas in Burma; and (E) increasing governmental transparency and accountability; and (5) a description and assessment of relationships of the Government of Burma with unlawful or sanctioned entities. (c) Update (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit on an annual basis to the appropriate congressional committees an update of the matters described in subsection (b)(4) and included in the report required under subsection (a). (2) Sunset The requirement to submit updates under paragraph (1) shall terminate at the end of the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Form The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex, if necessary. (e) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1234. Report on Department of Defense munitions strategy for United States Pacific Command (a) Report required Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the munitions strategy for the United States Pacific Command, including an identification of munitions requirements, an assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls, and necessary munitions investments. Such strategy shall cover the 10-year period beginning with 2015. (b) Elements The report on munitions strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An identification of current and projected munitions requirements, by class or type. (2) An assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls, including a census of current munitions capabilities and programs, not including ammunition. (3) A description of current and planned munitions programs, including with respect to procurement, research, development, test and evaluation, and deployment activities. (4) Schedules, estimated costs, and budget plans for current and planned munitions programs. (5) Identification of opportunities and limitations within the associated industrial base. (6) Identification and evaluation of technology needs and applicable emerging technologies, including with respect to directed energy, rail gun, and cyber technologies. (7) An assessment of how current and planned munitions programs, and promising technologies, may affect existing operational concepts and capabilities of the military departments or lead to new operational concepts and capabilities. (8) An assessment of programs and capabilities by other countries to counter the munitions programs and capabilities of the Armed Forces of the United States, not including with respect to ammunition, and how such assessment affects the munitions strategy of each military department. (9) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. (c) Form The report under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. 1235. Missile defense cooperation (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) Admiral Samuel Locklear, Commander of the United States Pacific Command, testified before the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on March 5, 2014, that in the spring of 2013, North Korea conducted another underground nuclear test, threatened the use of a nuclear weapon against the United States, and concurrently conducted a mobile missile deployment of an Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile, reportedly capable of ranging our western most U.S. territory in the Pacific.; (2) General Curtis Scaparrotti, Commander of the United States Forces Korea, testified before such committee on April 2, 2014, that CFC [Combined Forces Command] is placing special emphasis on missile defense, not only in terms of systems and capabilities, but also with regard to implementing an Alliance counter-missile strategy required for our combined defense.; and (3) increased emphasis and cooperation on missile defense among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, enhances the security of allies of the United States in Northeast Asia, increases the defense of forward-based forces of the United States, and enhances the protection of the United States. (b) Assessment Required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment to identify opportunities for increasing missile defense cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, and to evaluate options for short-range missile, rocket, and artillery defense capabilities. (c) Elements The assessment under subsection (b) shall include the following: (1) Candidate areas for increasing missile defense cooperation, including greater information sharing, systems integration, and joint operations. (2) Potential challenges and limitations to enabling such cooperation and plans for mitigating such challenges and limitations. (3) An assessment of the utility of short-range missile defense and counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar system capabilities, including with respect to— (A) the requirements for such capabilities to meet operational and contingency plan requirements in Northeast Asia; (B) cost, schedule, and availability; (C) technology maturity and risk; and (D) consideration of alternatives. (d) Briefing Required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the assessment under subsection (b). 1236. Maritime capabilities of Taiwan and its contribution to regional peace and stability (a) Report required Not later than April 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that contains the following: (1) A description and assessment of the posture and readiness of elements of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army expected or available to threaten the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including an assessment of— (A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army Navy in the littoral areas in and around the Taiwan Strait; (B) the amphibious and heavy sealift capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army Navy; (C) the capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army Air Force to establish air dominance over Taiwan; and (D) the capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army Second Artillery Corps to suppress or destroy the forces of Taiwan necessary to defend the security of Taiwan. (2) A description and assessment of the posture and readiness of elements of the armed forces of Taiwan expected or available to maintain the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including an assessment of— (A) the undersea and surface warfare capabilities of the navy of Taiwan; (B) the land-based anti-ship cruise missile capabilities of Taiwan; and (C) other anti-access or area-denial capabilities, such as mines, that contribute to the deterrence of Taiwan against actions taken to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means. (b) Form The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. (c) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States, in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8), should continue to make available to Taiwan such defense articles and services as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability; (2) the growth and modernization of the People’s Liberation Army, including its focus on preparing for potential conflict in the Taiwan Strait [which] appears to remain the principal focus and primary driver of China’s military investment, as noted in the 2013 Office of the Secretary of Defense Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, requires greater attention to the needed defense capabilities of Taiwan; and (3) the United States should consider opportunities to help enhance the maritime capabilities and nautical skills of the Taiwanese navy that can contribute to Taiwan’s self-defense and to regional peace and stability, including extending an invitation to Taiwan to participate in the 2014 Rim of the Pacific international maritime exercise in non-combat areas such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief operations. 1237. Independent assessment on countering anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities in the Asia-Pacific region (a) Assessment required (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with an independent entity to conduct an assessment of anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities that pose a threat to security in the Asia-Pacific region and strategies to mitigate such threats. (2) Matters to be included The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) identification of anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities; (B) assessment of gaps and shortfalls in the ability of the United States to address anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A) and plans of the Department of Defense to address such gaps and shortfalls; (C) assessment of Department of Defense strategies to counter or mitigate anti-access and area-denial strategies and capabilities identified under subparagraph (A); and (D) any other matters the independent entity determines to be appropriate. (b) Report required (1) In general Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment and strategies required under subsection (a) and any other matters the Secretary determines to be appropriate. (2) Form The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary. (c) Department of defense support The Secretary of Defense shall provide the independent entity described in subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, and analysis so that the entity may conduct a thorough and independent assessment as required under subsection (a). 1238. Sense of Congress reaffirming security commitment to Japan It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States highly values its alliance with the Government of Japan as a cornerstone of peace and security in the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights in order to promote peace, security, stability, and economic prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region; (2) the United States welcomes Japan’s determination to contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and security; (3) the United States supports recent increases in Japanese defense funding, adoption of a National Security Strategy, formation of security institutions such as the Japanese National Security Council, and other moves that will enable Japan to bear even greater alliance responsibilities; (4) the United States and Japan should continue to improve joint interoperability and collaborate on developing future capabilities with which to maintain regional stability in an increasingly uncertain security environment; (5) the United States and Japan should continue efforts to strengthen regional multilateral institutions that promote economic and security cooperation based on internationally accepted rules and norms; (6) the United States acknowledges that the Senkaku Islands are under the administration of Japan and opposes any unilateral actions that would seek to undermine such administration and remains committed under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security to respond to any armed attack in the territories under the administration of Japan; and (7) the United States reaffirms its commitment to the Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security that [e]ach Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes. 1239. Sense of Congress on opportunities to strengthen relationship between the United States and the Republic of Korea It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the alliance between the United States and Republic of Korea has served as an anchor for stability, security, and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula, in the Asia-Pacific region, and around the world; (2) the United States and Republic of Korea continue to strengthen and adapt the alliance to serve as a linchpin of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, recognizing the shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law as the foundations of the alliance; (3) the United States and Republic of Korea share deep concerns that North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missiles programs and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia and recognize that both nations are determined to achieve the peaceful denuclearization of North Korea, and remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the full range of issues related to North Korea; (4) the United States supports the vision of a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear weapons, free from the fear of war, and peacefully reunited on the basis of democratic and free market principles, as articulated in President Park’s Dresden address; (5) the United States and Republic of Korea are strengthening the combined defense posture on the Korean Peninsula; (6) the United States and Republic of Korea have decided that due to the evolving security environment in the region, including the enduring North Korean nuclear and missile threat, the current timeline to the transition of wartime operational control (OPCON) to a Republic of Korea-led defense in 2015 can be reconsidered; and (7) the United States welcomes the Republic of Korea’s ratification of a new five-year Special Measures Agreement, which establishes the framework for Republic of Korea contributions to offset the costs associated with the stationing of United States Forces Korea on the Korean Peninsula. E Other matters 1241. Extension of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism Section 1208(h) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking 2015 and inserting 2017. 1242. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities (a) Extension Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by striking 2015 and inserting 2016. (b) Cross-reference amendment Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking 413b(e) and inserting 3093(e). 1243. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq Section 1215(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1214 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 906; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), is further amended— (1) by striking fiscal year 2014 and inserting fiscal year 2015; (2) by striking non-operational; and (3) by striking in an institutional environment and inserting at a base or facility of the Government of Iraq. 1244. Modification of national security planning guidance to deny safe havens to al-Qaeda and its violent extremist affiliates (a) Modification Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)— (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C), (D), and (E) as subparagraph (D), (E), and (F), respectively; (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following: (C) For each specified geographic area, a description of the following: (i) The feasibility of conducting multilateral programs to train and equip the military forces of relevant countries in the area. (ii) The authority and funding that would be required to support such programs. (iii) How such programs would be implemented. (iv) How such programs would support the national security priorities and interests of the United States and complement other efforts of the United States Government in the area and in other specified geographic areas. ; and (C) in subparagraph (F) (as redesignated), by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting subparagraph (D); and (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking paragraph (2)(C) and inserting paragraph (2)(D). (b) Report Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: (4) Report (A) In general Not later than October 1, 2014, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the national security planning guidance required under paragraph (1), including any updates thereto. (B) Form The report may include a classified annex as determined to be necessary by the President. (C) Definition In this paragraph, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (i) the congressional defense committees; and (ii) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. . 1245. Enhanced authority to acquire goods and services of Djibouti in support of Department of Defense activities in United States Africa Command area of responsibility (a) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States forces should continue to be forward postured in Africa and in the Middle East; (2) Djibouti is in a strategic location to support United States vital national security interests in the region; (3) the United States should take definitive steps to maintain its basing access and agreements with the Government of Djibouti to support United States vital national security interests in the region; (4) the United States should devise and implement a comprehensive governmental approach to engaging with the Government of Djibouti to reinforce the strategic partnership between the United States and Djibouti; and (5) the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, should take concrete steps to advance and strengthen the relationship between United States and the Government of Djibouti. (b) Authority In the case of a good or service to be acquired in direct support of covered activities for which the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (c), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in which— (1) competition is limited to goods of Djibouti or services of Djibouti; or (2) a preference is provided for goods of Djibouti or services of Djibouti. (c) Determination (1) In general A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of the following: (A) That the good or service concerned is to be used only in support of covered activities. (B) That it is vital to the national security interests of the United States to limit competition or provide a preference as described in subsection (b) because such limitation or preference is necessary— (i) to reduce— (I) United States transportation costs; or (II) delivery times in support of covered activities; or (ii) to promote regional security, stability, and economic prosperity in Africa. (C) That the good or service is of equivalent quality of a good or service that would have otherwise been acquired. (2) Additional requirement A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a limitation or preference under subsection (b) unless the Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference will not adversely affect— (A) United States military operations or stability operations in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility; or (B) the United States industrial base. (d) Reporting and oversight In exercising the authority under subsection (b) to procure goods or services in support of covered activities, the Secretary of Defense— (1) in the case of the procurement of services, shall ensure that the procurement is conducted in accordance with the management structure implemented pursuant to section 2330(a) of title 10, United States Code; (2) shall ensure that such goods or services are identified and reported under a single, joint Department of Defense-wide system for the management and accountability of contractors accompanying United States forces operating overseas or in contingency operations (such as the synchronized predeployment and operational tracker (SPOT) system); and (3) shall ensure that the United States Africa Command has sufficiently trained staff and adequate resources to conduct oversight of procurements carried out pursuant to subsection (b), including oversight to detect and deter fraud, waste, and abuse. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered activities The term covered activities means Department of Defense activities in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility. (2) Good of djibouti The term good of Djibouti means a good wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of Djibouti. (3) Service of djibouti The term service of Djibouti means a service performed by a person that— (A) (i) is operating primarily in Djibouti; or (ii) is making a significant contribution to the economy of Djibouti through payment of taxes or use of products, materials, or labor of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of State; and (B) is properly licensed or registered by authorities of the Government of Djibouti, as determined by the Secretary of State. (f) Termination The authority and requirements of this section expire at the close of September 30, 2018. 1246. Strategic framework for United States security force assistance and cooperation in the European and Eurasian regions (a) Strategic framework (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall develop a strategic framework for United States security force assistance and cooperation in the European and Eurasian regions. (2) Elements The strategic framework required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An evaluation of the extent to which the threat to security and stability in the European and Eurasian regions is a threat to the national security of the United States and the security interests of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization alliance. (B) An identification of the primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of United States security force assistance and cooperation programs in such regions and of the resources required to achieve such objectives, priorities, and end states. (C) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of United States security force assistance and cooperation programs in such regions in making progress towards such objectives, priorities, and end-states, including an identification of key benchmarks for such progress. (D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral partnerships in such regions. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the strategic framework required by subsection (a). (2) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (3) Definition In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1247. Requirement of Department of Defense to continue implementation of United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence Globally and participation in Interagency Working Group (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the most dangerous places to be a woman are some of the most unstable and violent regions in the world and gender-based violence will impact one in three women worldwide and this in turn has a direct impact on United States national security, the stability of nations, the rule of law, democracy, and peace-building processes; (2) combating violence against women and girls through the implementation and integration of gender-based violence prevention and response mechanisms throughout United States overseas operations is a critical step toward promoting regional and global stability and achieving sustainable peace and security; (3) under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055, One Hundred Twelfth Congress), the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development were directed in the matter relating to section 7061 to submit to Congress a multi-year strategy to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls in countries where it is common through achievable and sustainable goals, benchmarks for measuring progress, and expected results, including through regular engagement with men and boys as community leaders and advocates in ending such violence; (4) Executive Order 13623 of August 10, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 49345) established the United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally (in this section referred to as the Strategy), the first such strategy submitted pursuant to the matter relating to section 7061 under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012; (5) Executive Order 13623 required the Department of Defense to participate in an Interagency Working Group co-chaired by the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development to implement the Strategy; and (6) since the authority for the Strategy was established initially in the matter relating to section 7061 under the Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference accompanying the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012, it is important for Congress to maintain its appropriate oversight over the implementation of the Strategy. (b) Briefings required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on efforts of the Department of Defense relating to participation in the Interagency Working Group to implement the Strategy. (2) Matters to be included As part of the briefings, the Secretary shall describe specifically efforts of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group to implement international violence against women and girls prevention and response strategies, funding allocations, programming, and associated outcomes. (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (c) Requirement to continue implementation of strategy and participation in interagency working group The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Department of Defense— (1) during the current period of the Strategy, continues to implement the Strategy as appropriate by reason of the role of the Department of Defense in the Interagency Working Group; and (2) continues to participate in interagency collaborative efforts to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls. 1248. Department of Defense situational awareness of economic and financial activity (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) There is a lack of situational awareness within the Department of Defense concerning how state and non-state adversaries and potential adversaries are interwoven into the international financial and trading systems via legal and licit activities and use such market activities to fund and equip themselves and advance their interests. (2) There is a lack of capability within the Department of Defense to formulate policy options within the interagency process, or for consideration within the Department, concerning whether state and non-state adversaries and potential adversaries have key vulnerabilities associated with their positioning within the global economic and financial systems. (3) The Department of Defense would benefit from having enhanced situational awareness regarding the commercial and strategic interactions of state and non-state adversaries and potential adversaries within the global economic and financial systems and integrating relevant findings into defense policy options, deterrence strategy, planning and preparedness. (4) The state-owned enterprises and sovereign wealth funds of adversaries and potential adversaries represent, in some cases, strategic tools of their controlling governments and their global operations and therefore warrant increased scrutiny and knowledge. (5) Without improved situational awareness of the business transactions and financial activities of state and non-state adversaries and potential adversaries, as well as entities they own and control, current efforts and deterrence strategies will continue to represent an underdeveloped defense requirement that lacks strategic direction. (b) Enhanced situational awareness required The Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to improve— (1) the situational awareness capabilities of the Department of Defense regarding the legal and licit business transactions and global market positioning of adversaries and potential adversaries; and (2) the ability of the Department to translate such situational awareness into the intelligence, planning, deterrence, and capabilities and strategies of the Department. 1249. Treatment of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and Nationality Act (a) Discretion to exclude Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from treatment as terrorist organizations The Secretary of State, after consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may exclude the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from the definition of terrorist organization in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)) for the limited purpose of issuing a temporary visa to a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. (b) Prohibition on judicial review Notwithstanding any other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination made pursuant to subsection (a). 1250. Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense systems None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense or for United States contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United States. F Reports and sense of Congress provisions 1261. Report on New Normal and general mission requirements of United States Africa Command (a) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States Africa Command should have sufficient assigned military forces; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets; crisis response forces; and enablers to support the crisis response forces to meet the New Normal and general mission requirements in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa Command; (2) with the current force posture and structure of the United States Africa Command, the United States is accepting a high level of risk in defending United States posts that are high risk, high threat posts; (3) the United States should posture forces forward and achieve the associated basing and access agreements to support such forces across the Continent of Africa in order to meet the New Normal and general mission requirements in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa Command; (4) the Department of Defense should consider reassigning to the United States Africa Command enabler assets currently assigned to, and shared with, the United States European Command; and (5) the United States Africa Command requires more intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets to meet the New Normal and general mission requirements in its area of responsibility. (b) Report Not later than January 15, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the extent to which the New Normal requirements have changed the force posture and structure required of the United States Africa Command to meet the New Normal and general mission requirements in its area of responsibility. (c) Elements The report required by subsection (b) shall include the following: (1) A detailed description of the New Normal and general mission requirements in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa Command. (2) A description of any changes required for the United States Africa Command to meet the New Normal and general mission requirements in its area of responsibility, including the gaps or shortfalls in capability, size, posture, agreements, basing, and enabler support of all crisis response forces and associated assets to access and defend posts that are high risk, high threat posts. (3) An assessment of how the United States Africa Command could employ permanently assigned military forces to support all mission requirements of the United States Africa Command. (4) An estimate of the annual intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the United States Africa Command and the shortfall, if any, in meeting such requirements in fiscal year 2015. (d) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (e) Form The report required by subsection (b) may include a classified annex. 1262. Report on contractors with the Department of Defense that have conducted significant transactions with Iranian persons or the Government of Iran (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for a period not to exceed 3 years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the following: (1) A list of each contractor with the Department of Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person (other than an Iranian person listed under paragraph (2)) or the Government of Iran. (2) A list of each contractor with the Department of Defense (including any subcontractors at any tier of the contractor), and any person owned or controlled by the contractor or that owns or controls the contractor, that has conducted a significant transaction with an Iranian person whose property has been blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079) or Executive Order 13382 (70 Fed. Reg. 38567) during the 5-year period preceding the date of the submission of the report. (3) The value of each significant transaction described in paragraphs (1) and (2). (b) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1263. Reports on nuclear program of Iran (a) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a report on the interim agreement relating to the nuclear program of Iran. Such report shall include— (1) verification of whether Iran is complying with such agreement; and (2) an assessment of the overall state of the nuclear program of Iran. (b) Additional reports If the interim agreement described in subsection (a) is renewed or if a comprehensive and final agreement is entered into regarding the nuclear program of Iran, by not later than 90 days after such renewal or final agreement being entered into, the President shall submit to Congress a report on such renewed or final agreement. Such report shall include the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a). 1264. Sense of Congress on United States presence and cooperation in the Arabian Gulf region to deter Iran It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States should maintain a robust forward presence and posture in order to support United States allies and partners in the Arabian Gulf region, including Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Israel, and to deter Iran; (2) the United States should seek ways to support the security posture of GCC countries in the Arabian Gulf region to deter Iran; (3) key strategic United States bases in the Arabian Gulf region that are used to deter Iran and would be used for any military operations in the Arabian Gulf region are entirely financed by funds for overseas contingency operations which is an unsustainable approach; (4) such key strategic United States bases in the Arabian Gulf region should be funded through the base budget of the Department of Defense; (5) the United States does not have status of forces agreements and defense agreements with key GCC allies, which would support the defense of the Arabian Gulf region and would deter Iran, and the United States should seek to complete these agreements immediately; (6) the interim agreement with Iran relating to Iran’s nuclear program does not address key aspects of Iran’s nuclear program, including the possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program; (7) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran’s efforts to develop a nuclear weapons capability should address past and present issues of concern of the United States, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the United Nations Security Council; (8) the United States should continue to put significant pressure on Iran’s network of organizations that conduct malign activities in the Arabian Gulf region, and around the globe, even while the United States engages in negotiations with Iran relating to Iran’s nuclear program; (9) the United States Government should not enter into a contract with any person or entity that is determined to have violated United States sanctions laws with respect to contracting with the Government of Iran and should encourage United States allies, partners, and other countries to maintain the same contracting standard; and (10) a comprehensive agreement with Iran relating to Iran’s efforts to develop or acquire a nuclear weapons capability should be agreed to by the United States only if— (A) Iran ceases the enrichment of uranium; (B) Iran has ceased the pursuit, acquisition, and development of, and has verifiably dismantled its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and ballistic missiles and ballistic missile launch technology; and (C) the Government of Iran has ceased providing support for acts of international terrorism. 1265. Sense of Congress on modernization of defense capabilities of Poland (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The efforts of Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces have the potential not only to enhance the national security of Poland but also to strengthen the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). (2) The main priority of Poland with respect to such efforts is to procure anti-aircraft and missile defense systems. (3) At a time when most NATO allies are cutting defense spending, Poland has maintained a steady defense budget and is making significant investment in procurement of new defense systems. (4) The United States should recognize the efforts of Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces and promote such efforts as a positive example for other NATO allies to follow. (5) The United States has enjoyed a close cultural, economic, political, and military relationship with Poland for many years and the efforts of Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces provide opportunities for the two countries to work together even more closely. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the President should seek to work with Poland to ensure that, as part of the efforts of Poland to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces— (A) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable, procures defense systems that are interoperable with NATO defense systems and will help fill critical NATO shortfalls; and (B) Poland, to the maximum extent practicable and to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of subparagraph (A), procures United States defense systems that— (i) will strengthen the bilateral, strategic partnership between the two countries; (ii) will provide Poland with proven defense systems capabilities; and (iii) promote deeper and closer bilateral cooperation between the two countries; and (2) the United States stands ready to assist Poland to achieve its goals to modernize its defense capabilities and restructure its armed forces. XIII Cooperative Threat Reduction 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction Programs and Funds (a) Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). (b) Fiscal year 2015 cooperative threat reduction funds defined As used in this title, the term fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs. (c) Availability of funds Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017. 1302. Funding Allocations (a) Funding for specific purposes Of the $365,108,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,000,000. (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $15,720,000. (3) For global nuclear security, $17,703,000. (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $254,342,000. (5) For proliferation prevention, $46,124,000. (6) For threat reduction engagement, $2,375,000. (7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,844,000. (b) Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposes No fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law. (c) Limited authority to vary individual amounts (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose. (2) Notice-and-wait required An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after— (A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and (B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification. 1303. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction activities with Russian Federation (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for Cooperative Threat Reduction may be obligated or expended for cooperative threat reduction activities with the Russian Federation until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to the appropriate congressional committees that— (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory; (2) the Russian Federation is no longer acting inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and (3) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if— (1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States and a description of the national security interest covered by the waiver; and (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Defense cannot make the certification under subsection (a); and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the information in the report under paragraph (1)(B). (c) Exception for certain military bases The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (2) CFE treaty The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992. (3) INF treaty The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987 and entered into force June 1, 1988. (e) Effective date This section takes effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with respect to funds described in subsection (a) that are unobligated as of such date of enactment. XIV Other Authorizations A Military Programs 1401. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. (b) Use Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— (1) the destruction of lethal chemical Agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1404. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1405. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries. B National Defense Stockpile 1411. Revisions to previously authorized disposals from the National Defense Stockpile (a) Fiscal Year 1999 Disposal Authority Section 3303(a)(7) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most recently amended by section 1412(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), is further amended by striking 1,386,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2016 and inserting $1,436,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2019. (b) Fiscal Year 2000 Disposal Authority Section 3402(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 50 U.S.C. 98d note), as most recently amended by section 1412 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81;125 Stat. 1654), is further amended by striking $830,000,000 by the end of fiscal year 2016 and inserting $850,000,000 by the end of 2019. C Other Matters 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (a) Authority for transfer of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer. (b) Use of transferred funds For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500). 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. XV Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations A Authorization of Appropriations 1501. Purpose The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces. 1502. Procurement Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities in the amount of $6,180,000,000. 1503. Operation and maintenance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance in the amount of $64,040,000,000. In addition to the authorization of appropriations in the preceding sentence, funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of the Air Force for the purpose of maintaining, operating, and upgrading the A–10 aircraft fleet in the amount of $635,000,000. 1504. Military personnel Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel in the amount of $7,140,000,000. 1505. Other appropriations (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Other Authorizations in the amount of $1,450,000,000. (b) Definition In this section, the term Other Authorizations means the Defense Health Program, Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, and National Guard and Reserve Equipment. B Financial Matters 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 1512. Special transfer authority (a) Authority to transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitations The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000. (b) Terms and Conditions Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. (c) Additional Authority The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001. C Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 1521. Continuation of existing limitations on the use of funds in the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 1522. Use of and transfer of funds from Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015. XVI Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters A Space Activities 1601. Department of Defense Space Security and Defense Program (a) Sense of Congress It is the Sense of Congress that— (1) critical United States national security space systems are facing a serious growing foreign threat; (2) the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation are both developing capabilities to disrupt the use of space by the United States in a conflict, as recently outlined by the Director of National Intelligence in testimony before Congress; and (3) a fully-developed multi-faceted space security and defense program is needed to deter and defeat any adversaries’ acts of space aggression. (b) Report on ability of the United States to deter and defeat adversary space aggression Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the ability of the Department of Defense to deter and defeat any act of space aggression by an adversary. (c) Study on alternative defense and deterrence strategies in response to foreign counterspace capabilities (1) Study required The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Office of Net Assessment, shall conduct a study of potential alternative defense and deterrent strategies in response to the existing and projected counterspace capabilities of China and Russia. Such study shall include an assessment of the congruence of such strategies with the current United States defense strategy and defense programs of record, and the associated implications of pursuing such strategies. (2) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the results of the study required under paragraph (1). 1602. Evolved expendable launch vehicle notification (a) Notification The Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of each change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle acquisition plan and schedule from the plan and schedule included in the budget submitted by the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015. Such notification shall include— (1) an identification of the change; (2) a national security rationale for the change; (3) the impact of the change on the evolved expendable launch vehicle block buy contract; (4) the impact of the change on the opportunities for competition for certified evolved expendable launch vehicle launch providers; and (5) the costs or savings of the change. (b) Applicability The requirement under subsection (a) shall apply to fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017. (c) Appropriate congressional committees In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) with respect to a change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle acquisition schedule for an intelligence-related launch, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 1603. Satellite communications responsibilities of Executive Agent for Space The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise Department of Defense directives and guidance to require the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space to ensure that in developing space strategies, architectures, and programs for satellite communications, the Executive Agent shall— (1) conduct strategic planning to ensure the Department of Defense is effectively and efficiently meeting the satellite communications requirements of the military departments and commanders of the combatant commands; (2) coordinate with the secretaries of the military departments and the heads of Defense Agencies to eliminate duplication of effort and to ensure that resources are used to achieve the maximum effort in related satellite communication science and technology; research, development, test and evaluation; production; and operations and sustainment; (3) coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief Information Officer of the Department to ensure that effective and efficient acquisition approaches are being used to acquire military and commercial satellite communications for the Department, including space, ground, and user terminal integration; and (4) coordinate with the chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council to develop a process to identify the current and projected satellite communications requirements of the Department. 1604. Liquid rocket engine development program (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should develop a next-generation liquid rocket engine that— (1) is made in the United States; (2) meets the requirements of the national security space community; (3) is developed by not later than 2019; (4) is developed using full and open competition; and (5) is available for purchase by all space launch providers of the United States. (b) Development (1) In general The Secretary of Defense shall develop a next-generation liquid rocket engine that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches. (2) Authorization of appropriations Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4201, $220,000,000 shall be available for the Secretary of Defense to develop a next-generation liquid rocket engine. (c) Coordination The Secretary shall coordinate with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, to the extent practicable, to ensure that the rocket engine developed under subsection (b) meets objectives that are common to both the national security space community and the space program of the United States. (d) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes— (1) a plan to carry out the development of the rocket engine under subsection (b), including an analysis of the benefits of using public-private partnerships; (2) the requirements of the program to develop such rocket engine; and (3) the estimated cost of such rocket engine. (e) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (3) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 1605. Pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite communication services (a) Pilot program (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may develop and carry out a pilot program to determine the feasibility and advisability of expanding the use of working capital funds by the Secretary to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders. (2) Funding Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2020 for the Department of Defense for the acquisition of commercial satellite communications, not more than $50,000,000 may be obligated or expended for such pilot program during such a fiscal year. (3) Certain authorities In carrying out the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Secretary may not use the authorities provided in sections 2208(k) and 2210(b) of title 10, United States Code. (b) Goals In developing and carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall ensure that the pilot program— (1) provides a cost effective and strategic method to acquire commercial satellite services; (2) incentivizes private-sector participation and investment in technologies to meet future requirements of the Department of Defense with respect to commercial satellite services; (3) takes into account the potential for a surge or other change in the demand of the Department for commercial satellite communications access in response to global or regional events; and (4) ensures the ability of the Secretary to control and account for the cost of programs and work performed under the pilot program. (c) Duration If the Secretary commences the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the pilot program shall terminate on October 1, 2020. (d) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a plan and schedule to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1). (2) Final report Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program under subsection (a)(1). The report shall include— (A) an assessment of expanding the use of working capital funds to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite capabilities to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders; and (B) a description of— (i) any contract entered into under the pilot program, the funding used under such contract, and the efficiencies realized under such contract; (ii) the advantages and challenges of using working capital funds as described in subparagraph (A); (iii) any additional authorities the Secretary determines necessary to acquire commercial satellite capabilities as described in subsection (a)(1); and (iv) any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to improving or extending the pilot program. B Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 1611. Assessment and limitation on availability of funds for intelligence activities and programs of United States Special Operations Command and special operations forces (a) Assessment (1) Requirement The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment of the intelligence activities and programs of United States Special Operations Command and special operations forces. (2) Inclusions The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following elements: (A) An overall strategy defining such intelligence activities and programs, including definitions of intelligence activities and programs unique to special operations. (B) A validated strategy and roadmap of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance programs and requirements for special operations across the future years defense program. (C) A comprehensive description of current and anticipated future Joint Staff validated requirements for the intelligence activities and programs of each geographic combatant commander within the respective geographic area of such covered combatant commander to be fulfilled by special operations forces, including those that can only be addressed by special operations forces, programs, or capabilities. (D) Validated present and planned United States Special Operations Command force structure requirements to meet current and anticipated special operations intelligence activities and programs of geographic combatant commanders. (E) A comprehensive review and assessment of statutory authorities, and Department and interagency policies, including limitations, for special operations forces intelligence activities and programs. (F) An independent, comprehensive cost estimate of special operations intelligence activities and programs by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense, including an estimate of the costs of the period of the current future years defense program, including a description of all rules and assumptions used to develop the cost estimates. (G) A copy of any memoranda of understanding or memoranda of agreement between the Department of Defense and other departments or agencies of the United States Government, or between components of the Department of Defense that are required to implement objectives of special operations intelligence activities and programs. (H) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. (3) Form The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (b) Limitations (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for procurement, Defense-wide, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the major force program 11 of the United States Special Operations Command may be obligated until the assessment required under subsection (a) is submitted. (2) Exception Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to funds authorized to be appropriated for Overseas Contingency Operations under title XV. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Appropriate committees of congress The term appropriate committees of congress means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (2) Future years defense program The term future years defense program means the future years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code. (3) Geographic combatant commander The term geographic combatant commander means a commander of a combatant command (as defined in section 161(c) of title 10, United States Code) with a geographic area of responsibility. 1612. Annual briefing on the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands At the same time that the President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020— (1) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on— (A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of each of the combatant commands; (B) for the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided, the satisfaction rate of each of the combatant commands with the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of such combatant command; and (C) a risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and shortfalls in such requirements in relation to such satisfaction rate; and (2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on short-term, mid-term, and long-term strategies to address the critical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands. 1613. One-year extension of report on imagery intelligence and geospatial information support provided to regional organizations and security alliances Section 921(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1878) is amended by striking 2014 and 2015 and inserting 2014 through 2016. 1614. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 430. TENCAP executive agent (a) In general There is in the Department of Defense a Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent who shall be appointed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. The Executive Agent shall report directly to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. The Executive Agent shall be responsible for working with the combatant commands, military services, and the intelligence community to develop methods to increase warfighter effectiveness through the exploitation of national capabilities and to promote cross-domain integration of such capabilities into military operations, training, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance activities. (b) Annual briefing At the same time as the budget materials are submitted to Congress in connection with the submission of the budget for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Executive Agent, in coordination with the commanders of the combatant commands, the Secretaries of the military departments, and the heads of the Department of Defense intelligence agencies and offices, shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a briefing on the investments, activities, challenges, and opportunities of the Executive Agent in carrying out the responsibilities under paragraph (1). The briefings shall be coordinated with each of the armed services, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance office. . 1615. Air Force intelligence organization (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence Center provides essential national expertise on foreign aerospace system capabilities, including cyber, space systems, missiles, and aircraft. (2) The Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence Center is organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air Staff, through the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Agency. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence Center provides indispensable intelligence support to a variety of customers, including the Air Force, the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, and national policymakers; and (2) to maintain operational effectiveness, the Air Force organizational reporting structure of the Air Force National Air and Space Intelligence Center should remain organizationally aligned to the Headquarters Air Staff with reporting through the Vice Chief of Staff. (c) Plan Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a strategic plan for the intelligence organization of the Air Force, including maintaining the National Air and Space Intelligence Center alignment to the Headquarters Air Staff. 1616. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (a) Prohibition No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to execute— (1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget; (2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program budget within the Department of Defense budget; or (3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) National intelligence program The term National Intelligence Program has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). (2) National intelligence program budget The term National Intelligence Program budget means the portions of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program. C Cyberspace-Related Matters 1621. Executive agent for cyber test and training ranges (a) Executive agent Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall designate a senior official of the Department of Defense to act as the executive agent for cyber and information technology test and training ranges. (b) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities (1) Establishment Not later than one year after the enactment of this Act, and in accordance with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent designated under subsection (a). (2) Specification The roles and responsibilities of the executive agent designated under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of cyber and information technology ranges, test facilities, test beds, and other means of testing, training, and developing software, personnel, and tools for accommodating the mission of the Department. (B) Serving as a single entity to organize and manage designated cyber and information technology test ranges, including— (i) establishing the priorities for cyber and information technology ranges to meet Department objectives; (ii) enforcing standards to meet requirements specified by the United States Cyber Command, the training community, and the research, development, testing, and evaluation community; (iii) identifying and offering guidance on the opportunities for integration amongst the designated cyber and information technology ranges regarding test, training, and development functions; (iv) finding opportunities for cost reduction, integration, and coordination improvements for the appropriate cyber and information technology ranges; (v) adding or consolidating cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department; and (vi) coordinating with interagency and industry partners on cyber and information technology range issues. (C) Defining a cyber range architecture that— (i) may add or consolidate cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department; (ii) coordinates with interagency and industry partners on cyber and information technology range issues; (iii) allows for integrated closed loop testing in a secure environment of cyber and electronic warfare capabilities; (iv) supports science and technology development, experimentation, testing and training; and (v) provides for interconnection with other existing cyber ranges and other kinetic range facilities in a distributed manner. (D) Certifying all cyber range investments of the Department of Defense. (E) Performing such other roles and responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (c) Support within Department of Defense In accordance with Directive 5101.1, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other components of the Department of Defense provide the executive agent designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate support and resources needed to perform the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agent. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term designated cyber and information technology range includes the National Cyber Range, the Joint Information Operations Range, the Defense Information Assurance Range, and the C4 Assessments Division of J6 of the Joint Staff. (2) The term Directive 5101.1 means Department of Directive 5101.1, or any successor directive relating to the responsibilities of an executive agent of the Department of Defense. (3) The term executive agent has the meaning given the term DoD Executive Agent in Directive 5101.1. D Nuclear Forces 1631. Preparation of annual budget request regarding nuclear weapons Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (3) (A) With respect to the preparation of a budget for a fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority unless the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a certification described in subparagraph (B). (B) A certification described in this subparagraph is a certification that includes the following: (i) Certification that, during the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year covered by the budget for which the certification is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated or expended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority made for such prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with a memorandum of agreement that was developed by the Nuclear Weapons Council and entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy. (ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weapons Council regarding how the Administrator for Nuclear Security implemented any agreements and decisions of the Council made during such prior fiscal year. (iii) An assessment from each of the Vice Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command regarding any effects to the military during such prior fiscal year that were caused by the delay or failure of the Administrator to implement any agreements or decisions described in clause (ii). (4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum of agreement described in paragraph (3)(B)(i) that covers such fiscal year. (5) (A) Not later than 30 days after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of— (i) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to meet the nuclear stockpile and stockpile stewardship program requirements during the fiscal year covered by the budget and the four subsequent fiscal years; and (ii) if the Commander determines that such budget does not allow the Federal Government to meet such requirements, a description of the steps being taken to meet such requirements. (B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under subparagraph (A), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense committees— (i) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman; and (ii) any comments of the Chairman. (6) In this subsection: (A) The term budget has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title. (B) The term defense budget materials has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title. (C) The term proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority means, in preparing a budget, a request for the Secretary of Defense to transfer an estimated amount of the proposed budget authority of the Secretary to the Secretary of Energy for purposes relating to nuclear weapons. . 1632. Independent review of the personnel reliability program of the Department of Defense and the human reliability program of the Department of Energy (a) Review (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy shall jointly seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an independent review of the personnel reliability program of the Department of Defense and the human reliability program of the Department of Energy. (2) Matters included The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An examination of the costs and benefits of each program described in paragraph (1). (B) Examples of successes and failures for each such program. (C) The reporting and administrative requirements of each such program. (D) The authorities and responsibilities of the commanders and managers of each such program. (E) Guidance for when certain positions must be included in each such program. (F) Recommendations with respect to making each such program more effective, more efficient, and, to the extent appropriate, more consistent between the Departments. (G) Any other matters the Secretaries jointly determine appropriate. (b) Report Not later than October 1, 2015, the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees such review. 1633. Assessment of nuclear weapon secondary requirement (a) Assessment The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall assess the annual secondary production requirement needed to sustain a safe, secure, reliable, and effective nuclear deterrent. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the assessment conducted under subsection (a). (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An explanation of the rationale and assumptions that led to the current 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the factors considered in determining such requirement. (B) An analysis of whether there are any changes to such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the reasons for any such changes. (C) A description of how the secondary production requirement is affected by or related to— (i) the demands of stockpile modernization, including the schedule for life extension programs; (ii) the requirement for a responsive infrastructure, including the ability to hedge against technical failure and geopolitical risk; and (iii) the number of secondaries held in reserve or the inactive stockpile, and the likelihood such secondaries may be reused. (E) The proposed time frame for achieving such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement. (3) Form The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 1634. Retention of missile silos (a) Sense of Congress It is the Sense of Congress that recent authorization and appropriations Acts passed by Congress and signed by the President have promulgated a national policy that it is in the national security interests of the United States to retain the maximum number of land-based strategic missile silos and their associated infrastructure to ensure that billions of dollars in prior taxpayer investments for such silos and infrastructure are not lost through precipitous actions which may be budget-driven, cyclical, and not in the long-term strategic interests of the United States. (b) Requirement The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to— (1) remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the missile field; and (2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile. (c) Termination The requirement in subsection (b) shall terminate on February 5, 2021. 1635. Certification on nuclear force structure Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the plan for implementation of the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, will enable the United States to meet its obligations under such treaty in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of the United States— (1) are capable, survivable, and balanced; and (2) maintain strategic stability, deterrence and extended deterrence, and allied assurance. E Missile Defense Programs 1641. Theater air and missile defense of allies of the United States (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) A Patriot battery of the United States providing a short-range air and missile defense capability has previously been rotationally deployed to Poland, pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the Government of Poland, during a period occurring between 2010 to 2012. (2) The deployment of the Patriot battery did not include operational missiles and was not replaced with another short-range air and missile defense system upon completion of the deployment rotation in 2012. (b) Policy It is the policy of the United States that available short-range air and missile defense systems and terminal missile defense systems of the United States with operational missiles be rotationally deployed to central and eastern European allies, pursuant to agreements between the United States and such allies, to strengthen the air and missile defense capabilities of such allies, as appropriate. (c) Aegis ashore system (1) In general Not later than December 31, 2016, and pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure the operational availability of the Aegis Ashore system site in Poland. (2) Relocation of assets The Secretary may relocate the necessary assets of the Aegis weapon system between and within the DDG–51 Class Destroyer program and the Aegis Ashore program to meet mission requirements. (3) Briefings The Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees quarterly briefings to update the status of the progress in carrying out paragraph (1). (4) Transfer authority The Secretary may use the authority provided under section 1001 to carry out this subsection. (d) Missile defense capability of Poland (1) Deployment Not later than December 31, 2014, and pursuant to an agreement between the United States and the Government of Poland, the Secretary of Defense shall deploy to Poland a system providing a short-range air and missile defense capability or terminal missile defense capability, or both, and the personnel required to operate and maintain such system. (2) Removal No action may be taken to effect or implement the removal of the system or the personnel described in paragraph (1) unless— (A) at least 30 days before the removal, the Secretary of Defense notifies the appropriate congressional committees that such removal is in the national security interests of the United States; or (B) the removal is requested by the Government of Poland in the manner provided in the agreement between the United States and the Government of Poland regarding the system and personnel. (e) Notification The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate congressional committees by not later than 60 days after the date on which a NATO member state makes a request that communicates to the Secretary the interest of the member state in hosting missile defense capabilities described in subsection (b) and the plan of the Secretary for addressing such request. (f) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1642. Sense of Congress on procurement and deployment of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should not procure an additional capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a successful intercept flight test of the capability enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm line for the industrial base. XVII Defense Audit Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Auditability 1701. Findings and purposes (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Congress remains steadfast in supporting the continuing efforts of the Department of Defense to produce auditable financial statements. Such efforts are essential to ensure taxpayers dollars are accounted for at the largest department of the Federal Government (2) As the 2017 and 2019 statutory audit deadlines approach, Congress believes an advisory panel is necessary to better track the Department’s progress. (b) Purposes The purposes of the Advisory Panel are— (1) to work on behalf of Congress to actively monitor the audit readiness work of the Department of Defense and, after September 30, 2017, the Department’s 2018 audit; and (2) to regularly providing interim findings and recommendations to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, with the purpose of making the Department auditable and aiding in oversight of the Department by such Committees. 1702. Establishment of Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Audit Readiness (a) Establishment There is established the Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Audit Readiness (in this title referred to as the Advisory Panel). (b) Membership (1) Composition The Advisory Panel shall be composed of 10 members, of whom— (A) two shall be appointed jointly by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the Ranking Member of each such Committee, from among members of different political parties from each such Committee, to serve as Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel; (B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Appointment date The appointments of the members of the Advisory Panel shall be made not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Qualifications Appointments to the Advisory Panel shall be made from among individuals who are certified public accountants and have work experience within the Department of Defense or private financial management sectors. An individual who is an officer or employee of the Federal Government may not be appointed to the Advisory Panel. (c) Period of appointment; vacancies Members shall be appointed for the life of the Advisory Panel. Any vacancy in the Advisory Panel shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (d) Initial meeting Not later than 60 days after the date on which all members of the Advisory Panel have been appointed, the Advisory Panel shall hold its first meeting. (e) Meetings The Advisory Panel shall meet regularly at the call of the Co-Chairmen. (f) Quorum Five members of the Advisory Panel shall constitute a quorum, but four members may hold hearings. 1703. Duties of the Advisory Panel (a) In general The duties of the Advisory Panel are as follows: (1) To provide the Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), independent advice on the Department’s financial management, including the financial reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit process, and processes for monitoring compliance with applicable laws and regulations. (2) To identify, review, and evaluate the work of the Department of Defense (including the work of each military department and Defense Agency) on auditability. (3) To identify problem areas and recommend solutions in order to aid the Department in meeting the following statutory deadlines: (A) By not later than September 30, 2017, validating the financial statements of the Department of Defense as ready for audit, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note). (B) By not later than March 31, 2019, auditing the financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018, as required by section 1003(a)(2)(a)(iii) of such Act (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (4) To provide briefings regularly to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the Advisory Panel’s findings, analysis, and recommendations. (b) Reports Not later than March 31 and September 30 of each year during the life of the Advisory Panel, beginning with March 31, 2015, the Advisory Panel shall submit to the congressional defense committees findings and conclusions of the Advisory Panel as a result of its work under subsection (a) during the period covered by the report, together with such recommendations as it considers appropriate. (c) Authority of Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) In accordance with Department policy and procedures, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) is authorized to act upon the advice emanating from the Advisory Panel. 1704. Powers of the Advisory Panel (a) Hearings The Advisory Panel may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Advisory Panel considers advisable to carry out this title. (b) Information from Department of Defense The Advisory Panel may secure directly from the Department of Defense such information as the Advisory Panel considers necessary to carry out this title. Upon request of the Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such information to the Advisory Panel. (c) Postal services The Advisory Panel may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as other departments and agencies of the Federal Government. 1705. Advisory Panel personnel matters (a) Compensation of members Members of the Advisory Panel shall serve without compensation for such service. (b) Travel expenses Each member of the Advisory Panel shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with applicable provisions under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code. (c) Staff (1) Director The Advisory Panel may have a Director, who shall be appointed by the Co-Chairmen. (2) Staff The Co-Chairmen may appoint such additional staff as may be necessary to enable the Advisory Panel to perform its duties, except that the number of staff may not exceed the equivalent of five full-time employees. (3) Compensation The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel may fix the compensation of the Director and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the Director and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of such title. (d) Detail of government employees Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Advisory Panel without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege. (e) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services The Co-Chairmen of the Advisory Panel may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title. 1706. Termination of the Advisory Panel The Advisory Panel shall terminate April 30, 2019. B Military Construction Authorizations 2001. Short title This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law (a) Expiration of authorizations after three years Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— (1) October 1, 2017; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of— (1) October 1, 2017; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2018 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 2003. Effective date Titles XXI through XXVII shall take effect on the later of— (1) October 1, 2014; or (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. XXI Army Military Construction 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount CaliforniaConcord$15,200,000 Fort Irwin$45,000,000 ColoradoFort Carson$89,000,000 HawaiiFort Shafter$83,000,000 KentuckyBlue Grass Army Depot$15,000,000 Fort Campbell$23,000,000 New YorkFort Drum$27,000,000 PennsylvaniaLetterkenny Army Depot $16,000,000 South CarolinaFort Jackson$52,000,000 TexasFort Hood$46,000,000 VirginiaFort Lee$86,000,000 Joint Base Langley-Eustis$7,700,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount Guantanamo BayGuantanamo Bay$92,800,000 JapanKadena Air Base$10,600,000 2102. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: Army: Family Housing State/CountryInstallationUnitsAmount Illinois Rock IslandFamily Housing New Construction$19,500,000 KoreaCamp WalkerFamily Housing New Construction$57,800,000 (b) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $1,309,000. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of an Explosives Research and Development Loading Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may use available unobligated balances of amounts appropriated for military construction for the Army to complete work on the project within the scope specified for the project in the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request for authorization of the project. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projects (a) Fort drum In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital contribution to a public or private utility company in order for the utility company to extend the utility company’s gas line to the installation boundary. Such capital contribution is not a change in the scope of work of the project under section 2853 of title 10, United States Code. (b) Fort Leonard wood In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion Complex Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct the Battalion Headquarters with classrooms for a unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment unit. (c) Fort McNair In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair, District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle Storage Building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle storage. (d) Fort Belvoir The table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking $94,000,000 in the amount column and inserting $183,000,000. 2106. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437) and extended by section 2109 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 988), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later: (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount GeorgiaFort BenningLand Acquisition$12,200,000 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later: (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) as follows: Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount GeorgiaFort BenningLand Acquisition$5,100,000 Fort BenningLand Acquisition$25,000,000 North CarolinaFort BraggUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hanger$54,000,000 TexasFort BlissApplied Instruction Building$8,300,000 Fort BlissVehicle Maintenance Facility$19,000,000 Fort HoodUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hanger$47,000,000 VirginiaFort BelvoirRoad and Infrastructure Improvements$25,000,000 XXII Navy Military Construction 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount ArizonaYuma$16,608,000 CaliforniaBridgeport$16,180,000 San Diego$47,110,000 District of ColumbiaNaval Support Activity$31,735,000 FloridaJacksonville$30,235,000 Mayport$20,520,000 GuamJoint Region Marianas$50,651,000 HawaiiKaneohe Bay$53,382,000 Pearl Harbor$9,698,000 MarylandAnnanpolis$120,112,000 Indian Head$15,346,000 Patuxent River$9,860,000 NevadaFallon$31,262,000 North CarolinaCherry Point Marine Corps Air Station$41,588,000 Pennsylvania Philadelphia$23,985,000 South CarolinaCharleston$35,716,000 VirginiaDahlgren$27,313,000 Norfolk$39,274,000 Portsmouth$9,743,000 Quantico$12,613,000 Yorktown$26,988,000 WashingtonBremerton$16,401,000 Port Angeles$20,638,000 Whidbey Island$24,390,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount BahrainSouth West Asia$27,826,000 DjiboutiCamp Lemonier$9,923,000 JapanIwakuni$6,415,000 Kadena Air Base$19,411,000 Marine Corps Air Station Futenma$4,639,000 Okinawa$35,685,000 SpainRota$20,233,000 (c) Unspecified worldwide Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military construction projects at unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for unspecified locations, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Navy: Unspecified Worldwide Locations CountryLocationAmount Unspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Worldwide Locations$38,985,000 2202. Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $472,000. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $15,940,000. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Yuma In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately 70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667). (b) Camp Pendelton In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendelton, California, for construction of an Infantry Squad Defense Range, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to 9,000 square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667). (c) Kings bay In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for construction of a Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary of the Navy may expand the enclave fencing system to three layers of fencing and construct two elevated fixed fighting positions with associated supporting facilities using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667). 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for construction of Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 240 square meters of armory, 48 square meters of Safety Officer/Target Storage Building, and 667 square meters of Range Operations Building using appropriations available for the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (127 Stat. 990). 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) and extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations State/CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount BahrainSouth West AsiaNavy Central Command Ammunition Magazines$89,280,000 GuamNaval Activities, GuamDefense Access Roads Improvements$66,730,000 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations State/CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount CaliforniaCamp PendeltonNorth Area Waste Water Conveyance$78,271,000 Camp PendeltonInfantry Squad Defense Range$29,187,000 Twentynine PalmsLand Expansion$8,665,000 FloridaJacksonvilleP–8A Hangar Upgrades$6,085,000 GeorgiaKings BayCrab Island Security Enclave$52,913,000 Kings BayWRA Land/Water Interface$33,150,000 MarylandPatuxent RiverAircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2$45,844,000 XXIII Air Force Military Construction 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount AlaskaClear Air Force Base$11,500,000 ArizonaLuke Air Force Base$26,800,000 GuamJoint Region Marianas$13,400,000 KansasMcConnell Air Force Base$34,400,000 MassachusettsHanscom Air Force Base$13,500,000 NevadaNellis Air Force Base$53,900,000 New JerseyJoint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst$5,900,000 OklahomaTinker Air Force Base$111,000,000 TexasJoint Base San Antonio$5,800,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States CountryInstallationAmount United KingdomCroughton Royal Air Force Base$92,223,000 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land acquisition functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, for base infrastructure at that location, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire fee or lesser real property interests in approximately 11.5 acres of land contiguous to Shaw Air Force Base for the project using funds appropriated to the Department of the Air Force for construction in years prior to fiscal year 2015. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) and extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount BahrainShaikh Isa Air BaseNorth Apron Expansion$45,000,000. 2305. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations State/CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount AlaskaEielson AFBDormitory (168 RM)$45,000,000 ItalySigonella Naval Air StationUAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility$15,000,000 XXIV Defense Agencies Military Construction A Defense Agency Authorizations 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount ArizonaFort Huachuca$1,871,000 CaliforniaCamp Pendelton$11,841,000 Coronado$70, 340,000 Lemoore$52,500,000 ColoradoPeterson Air Force Base$15,200,000 GeorgiaHunter Army Airfield$7,692,000 Robins Air Force Base$19,900,000 HawaiiJoint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam$52,900,000 KentuckyFort Campbell$18,000,000 MarylandFort Meade$54,207,000 Joint Base Andrews$18,300,000 MichiganSelfridge Air National Guard Base$35,100,000 MississippiStennis$27,547,000 NevadaFallon$20,241,000 New MexicoCannon Air Force Base$23,333,000 North CarolinaCamp Lejeune$52,748,000 Fort Bragg$93,136,000 Seymour Johnson AFB$8,500,000 South CarolinaBeaufort$40,600,000 South DakotaEllsworth Air Force Base$8,000,000 TexasJoint Base San Antonio$38,300,000 VirginiaCraney Island$36,500,000 Defense Distribution Depot Richmond$5,700,000 Fort Belvoir$7,239,000 Joint Base Langley-Eustis$41,200,000 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story$39,588,000 Pentagon$15,100,000 CONUS ClassifiedClassified Location$53,073,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount AustraliaGeraldton$9,600,000 BelgiumBrussels$79,544,000 Guantanamo BayGuantanamo Bay$76,290,000 JapanMisawa Air Base$37,775,000 Okinawa$170,901,000 Sasebo$37,681,000 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount CaliforniaEdwards Air Force Base$4,500,000 Fort Hunter Liggett$13,500,000 Vandenberg Air Force Base$7,197,000 ColoradoFort Carson$3,000,000 FloridaEglin Air Force Base$3,850,000 GeorgiaMoody Air Force Base$3,600,000 HawaiiMarine Corps Base Hawaii$8,460,000 IllinoisGreat Lakes Naval Station$2,190,000 MainePortsmouth Naval Shipyard$2,740,000 MarylandFort Detrick$2,100,000 North DakotaOffutt Air Force Base$2,869,000 OklahomaTinker Air Force Base$3,609,000 OregonOregon City Armory$6,600,000 UtahDugway Proving Ground$15,400,000 VirginiaNaval Station Norfolk$11,360,000 Pentagon$2,120,000 Various LocationsVarious Locations$23,679,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount Diego GarciaNaval Support Facility$14,620,000 JapanFleet Activities Yokosuka$8,030,000 GermanySpangdahlem$4,800,000 Various LocationsVarious Locations$5,776,000 (c) Limitation on set-aside of Facilities Restoration and Modernization program funds for energy projects Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriation in section 301 for operation and maintenance and made available for facilities restoration and modernization may not be set-aside for the exclusive purpose of funding energy projects on military installations. Installation energy projects must compete in the normal process of determining installation requirements. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount District of ColumbiaBolling Air Force BaseCooling Tower Expansion$2,070,000 DIAC Parking Garage$13,586,000 Electrical Upgrades$1,080,000 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations State/CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount CaliforniaCoronadoSOF Support Activity Operations Facility$42,000,000 GermanyUSAG BaumholderWetzel-Smith Elementary School$59,419,000 ItalyUSAG VicenzaVicenza High School $41,864,000 JapanYokota Air BaseYokota High School$49,606,000 VirginiaPentagon ReservationHeliport Control Tower and Fire Station$6,457,000 Pedestrian Plaza$2,285,000 2406. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 projects pending submission of required reports (a) Limitation No amounts may be obligated or expended for the military construction projects described in subsection (b) and otherwise authorized by section 2401(a) until both of the reports described in subsection (c) have been submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (b) Covered projects The limitation imposed by subsection (a) applies to the following military construction projects: (1) The construction of a human performance center facility at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek–Story, Virginia. (2) The construction of a squadron operations facility at Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. (c) Reports described The reports referred to in subsection (a) are— (1) the report on the United States Special Operations Command Preservation of the Force and Families initiative requested under the heading U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction Requirements in the Joint Explanatory Statement to Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as printed in the Congressional Record on December 12, 2013 (page H7956); and (2) the report on the review of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents required by section 581 of this Act. B Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. (b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under subsection (a) may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project (a) Modification The table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is amended— (1) in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by striking $746,000,000 in the amount column and inserting $780,000,000; and (2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the amount column and inserting $1,237,920,000. (b) Conforming amendment Section 2405(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is further amended by striking $723,200,000 and inserting $757,200,000. XXV North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities A Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard: Inside the United States StateLocationAmount DelawareDagsboro$10,800,000 Maine Augusta$30,000,000 MarylandHavre De Grace$12,400,000 MontanaHelena$38,000,000 New MexicoAlamogordo$5,000,000 North DakotaValley City$10,800,000 VermontNorth Hyde Park$4,400,000 WashingtonYakima$19,000,000 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army Reserve StateLocationAmount CaliforniaFresno$22,000,000 March Air Force Base$25,000,000 ColoradoFort Carson$5,000,000 IllinoisArlington Heights$26,000,000 MississippiStarkville$9,300,000 New JerseyJoint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst$26,000,000 New YorkMattydale$23,000,000 VirginiaFort Lee$16,000,000 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve StateLocationAmount Pennsylvania Pittsburgh$17,650,000 WashingtonWhidbey Island$27,755,000 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air National Guard StateLocationAmount Connecticut Bradley International Airport$16,306,000 IowaDes Moines Municipal Airport$8,993,000 MichiganW.K. Kellog Regional Airport$6,000,000 New HampshirePease International Trade Port$41,902,000 PennsylvaniaWillow Grove Air Reserve Field$5,662,000 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force Reserve StateLocationAmount GeorgiaRobins Air Force Base$27,700,000 North Carolina Seymour Johnson Air Force Base$9,800,000 TexasForth Worth$3,700,000 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Other Matters 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects (a) Modification (1) Kansas city In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas, instead of constructing a new facility in Kansas City. (2) Attleboro In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1677), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts, instead of constructing a new facility in Attleboro, . (b) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2018, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2019, whichever is later. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2133) for Stormville, New York, for construction of a Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct the facility at Camp Smith, New York, and build a 53,760 square foot maintenance facility in lieu of a 75,156 square foot maintenance facility. 2613. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452) and extended by section 2612 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1003), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is a follows: Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount Puerto RicoCamp SantiagoMultipurpose Machine Gun Range$9,200,000 XXVII Base Realignment and Closure Activities A Authorization of Appropriations 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Prohibition on Additional BRAC Round 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. C Other Matters 2721. Force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory and assessment of infrastructure necessary to support the force structure (a) Preparation and submission of Force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory As part of the budget justification documents submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following: (1) Two force-structure plans for each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps for the 20-year period beginning with fiscal year 2016, including the probable end-strength levels and major military force units (including land force divisions, carrier and other major combatant vessels, air wings, and other comparable units) needed to meet anticipated threats, and the anticipated levels of funding that will be available for national defense purposes during such period. One force-structure plan shall reflect the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review and the other force-structure plan shall reflect the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.), as amended by title I of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25) and section 101 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67). (2) A comprehensive inventory of military installations world-wide for each military department, with specifications of the number and type of facilities in the active and reserve forces of each military department. (b) Relationship of plans and inventory Using the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall prepare (and include as part of the submission of such plans and inventory) the following: (1) A description of the infrastructure necessary to support the force structure described in each force-structure plan. (2) A discussion of categories of excess infrastructure and infrastructure capacity, and the Secretary’s targets for the reduction of such excess capacity. (3) An assessment of the excess infrastructure and the value of retaining certain excess infrastructure to support surge or reversibility requirements. (4) An economic analysis of the effect of the closure or realignment of military installations to reduce excess infrastructure. (c) Special considerations In determining the level of necessary versus excess infrastructure under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following: (1) The anticipated continuing need for and availability of military installations outside the United States, taking into account current restrictions on the use of military installations outside the United States and the potential for future prohibitions or restrictions on the use of such military installations. (2) Any efficiencies that may be gained from joint tenancy by more than one branch of the Armed Forces at a military installation or the reorganization or association of two or more military installations as a single military installation. (d) Certification of Need for Further Closures and Realignments (1) Certification required On the basis of the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a) and the descriptions and economic analysis prepared under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall include as part of the submission of the plans and inventory a certification regarding whether the need exists for the closure or realignment of additional military installations. (2) Additional certification As a condition on the certification under paragraph (1) that the need for an additional round of closures and realignments exists, the Secretary shall include an additional certification that every recommendation for the closure or realignment of military installations in the additional round of closures and realignments will result in annual net savings for each of the military departments within six years after the initiation of the additional round of closures and realignments. (e) Comptroller General Evaluation (1) Evaluation required If the certifications are provided under subsection (d), the Comptroller General of the United States shall prepare an evaluation of the following: (A) The force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a), including an evaluation of the accuracy and analytical sufficiency of the plans and inventory. (B) The need for the closure or realignment of additional military installations. (2) Submission The Comptroller General shall submit the evaluation to Congress not later than 60 days after the date on which the force-structure plans and infrastructure inventory are submitted to Congress. 2722. Modification of property disposal procedures under base realignment and closure process (a) Report on excess property Section 2905 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection: (f) Report on designation of property as excess instead of surplus (1) Not later than 180 days after the date on which real property located at a military installation closed or realigned under this part is declared excess, but not surplus, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report identifying the property and including the information required by paragraph (2). The Secretary shall update the report every 180 days thereafter until the property is either declared surplus or transferred to another Federal agency. (2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (A) The reason for the excess designation. (B) The nature of the contemplated transfer. (C) The proposed timeline for the transfer. (D) Any impediments to completing the Federal agency screening process. . (b) Effect of lack of recognized redevelopment authority Section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended— (1) by striking The term and inserting (A) The term; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) If no redevelopment authority referred to in subparagraph (A) exists with respect to a military installation, the term shall include the following: (i) The local government in whose jurisdiction the military installation is wholly located. (ii) A local government agency or State government agency designated by the chief executive officer of the State in which the military installation is located under subparagraph (B) of section 2905(b)(3) for the purpose of the consultation required by subparagraph (A) of such section. . 2723. Final settlement of claims regarding caretaker agreement for former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah (a) Settlement of claims Subject to the condition imposed by subsection (b), any claim by the United States against the City of Ogden, Utah, and the Ogden Local Redevelopment Authority (as the recognized redevelopment authority for former Defense Depot Ogden, Utah, which was closed pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)) related to the terms or execution of the Caretaker Agreement originally signed and dated September 10, 1997, between the Department of the Army and the City of Ogden and the Ogden Local Redevelopment Authority is hereby declared to be settled, the City of Ogden and the Ogden Local Redevelopment Authority have no remaining financial obligation to the United States arising from that agreement, and the Defense Contract Management Agency shall cease any collection efforts with respect to any such claim. (b) Condition The operation of subsection (a) is conditioned on release by the City of Ogden and the Ogden Local Redevelopment Authority of any remaining financial claim against the United States raising from the Caretaker Agreement described in subsection (a). XXVIII Military Construction General Provisions A Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 2801. Prevention of circumvention of military construction laws Subsection (a) of section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the Secretary concerned may carry out only such military construction projects, land acquisitions, and defense access road projects (as described under section 210 of title 23) as are specifically authorized in a Military Construction Authorization Act. . 2802. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction (a) Unspecified minor military construction project described Subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking $2,000,000 and inserting $3,000,000; and (2) by striking the second sentence. (b) Increased threshold for application of Secretory approval and congressional notification requirements Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking $750,000 and inserting $1,000,000. (c) Maximum amount of operation and maintenance funds authorized to be used for projects Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking $750,000 and inserting $1,000,000. (d) Annual location adjustment of dollar limitations Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Adjustment of dollar limitations for location Each fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar limitations specified in this section applicable to an unspecified minor military construction project to reflect the area construction cost index for military construction projects published by the Department of Defense during the prior fiscal year for the location of the project. . 2803. Use of one-step turn-key contractor selection procedures for additional facility projects Section 2862 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 2862. Turn-key selection procedures (a) Authority to use for certain purposes The Secretary concerned may use one-step turn-key selection procedures for the purpose of entering into a contract for any of the following purposes: (1) The construction of an authorized military construction project. (2) A repair project (as defined in section 2811(e) of this title) with an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000. (3) The construction of a facility as part of an authorized security assistance activity. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term one-step turn-key selection procedures means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary concerned. (2) The term security assistance activity means— (A) humanitarian and civic assistance authorized by sections 401 and 2561 of this title; (B) foreign disaster assistance authorized by section 404 of this title; (C) foreign military construction sales authorized by section 29 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2769); (D) foreign assistance authorized under sections 607 and 632 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2357, 2392); and (E) other international security assistance specifically authorized by law. . 2804. Extension of limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility Section 2809 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1013) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by inserting or the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 after this division; and (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking the date of the enactment of this Act and inserting December 27, 2013. B Real Property and Facilities Administration 2811. Consultation requirement in connection with Department of Defense major land acquisitions Section 2664(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) before No military department; (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following new paragraph: (2) If the real property acquisition is a major land acquisition inside a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or any territory or possession of the United States, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the chief executive officer of the State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the territory or possession in which the land is located to determine options for completing the real property acquisition. ; (3) by striking The foregoing limitation and inserting the following: (3) The limitations imposed by paragraphs (1) and (2) ; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) In this subsection, the term major land acquisition means any land acquisition not covered by the authority to acquire low-cost interests in land under section 2663(c) of this title. . 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial institutions operating on military installations Section 2667(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) (A) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal, extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary concerned with a financial institution selected in accordance with the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation providing for the selection of financial institutions to operate on military installations if each of the following applies: (i) The on-base financial institution was selected before the date of the enactment of this paragraph or competitive procedures are used for the selection of any new financial institutions. (ii) A current and binding operating agreement is in place between the installation commander and the selected on-base financial institution. (B) The renewal, extension, or succeeding lease shall terminate upon the termination of the operating agreement described in subparagraph (A)(ii) associated with that lease. . 2813. Arsenal Installation Reutilization Authority Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (h), (i), and (j) as subsections (i), (j), and (k), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): (h) Arsenal installation reutilization authority (1) In the case of a military manufacturing arsenal, the Secretary concerned shall delegate, subject to paragraph (2), the authority provided by this section to the commander of the military manufacturing arsenal or, if part of a larger military installation, the installation commander for the purpose of— (A) helping to maintain the viability of military manufacturing arsenals and any installations on which they are located; (B) eliminating, or at least reducing, the cost of Government ownership of military manufacturing arsenals, including the costs of operations and maintenance, the costs of environmental remediation, and other costs; and (C) leveraging private investment at military manufacturing arsenals through long-term facility use contracts, property management contracts, leases, or other agreements that support and advance the preceding purposes. (2) The authority delegated under paragraph (1) does not include the authority to enter into a lease or contract under this section to carry out any activity covered by section 4544(b) of this title related to sale of articles manufactured by a military manufacturing arsenal or services performed by a military manufacturing arsenal or the performance of manufacturing work at the military manufacturing arsenal. (3) Both leases and contracts are authorized under this section for a military manufacturing arsenal, and, notwithstanding subsection (b)(1), the term of the lease or contract may be for up to 25 years if a lease or contract of that duration will promote the national defense or be in the public interest. (4) In this subsection, the term military manufacturing arsenal means a Government-owned, Government-operated defense plant of the Department of the Defense that manufactures weapons, weapon components, or both. . 2814. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses relating to certain real property transactions (a) Authority to credit reimbursed funds to accounts currently available Section 2695(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: (1) Amounts collected by the Secretary of a military department under subsection (a) for administrative expenses shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary— (A) to the appropriation, fund, or account from which the expenses were paid; or (B) to an appropriate appropriation, fund, or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for which the expenses were paid. ; and (2) in the second sentence, by striking Amounts so credited and inserting the following: (2) Amounts credited under paragraph (1) . (b) Prospective applicability The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not apply to administrative expenses related to a real property transaction referred to in section 2695(b) of title 10, United States Code, that were covered by the Secretary of a military department using amounts appropriated to the Secretary before the date of the enactment of this Act. 2815. Special easement acquisition authority, Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii (a) Easement acquisition authority The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority provided by sections 2664 and 2684a of title 10, United States Code, to enter into agreements with or acquire from willing sellers easements and other interests in real property in the vicinity of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands, Kauai, Hawaii, for the purpose of— (1) limiting encroachments on military training, testing, and operations at that installation; or (2) facilitating such training, testing, and operations. (b) Consideration As consideration for the acquisition of an easement or other interest in real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy may not pay an amount in excess of the fair market value of the interest to be acquired. (c) Conditions on use of authority (1) No use of condemnation An easement or other interest in real property may be acquired under subsection (a) only from a willing seller. (2) No acquisition of complete title Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of the Navy to use this section as authority to acquire all right, title, and interest in and to real property in the vicinity of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands. (d) Vicinity defined In this section, the term vicinity means the area within 30 miles of the boundaries of the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands. 2816. National security considerations for inclusion of Federal property on National Register of Historic Places or designation as National Historic Landmark under the National Historic Preservation Act Section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(a)) is amended as follows: (1) In paragraph (2)— (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period and inserting ; and; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (G) notifying the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate if the property is owned by the Federal Government when the property is being considered for inclusion on the National Register, for designation as a National Historic Landmark, or for nomination to the World Heritage List. . (2) By redesignating paragraphs (7) and (8) as paragraphs (8) and (9), respectively. (3) By inserting after paragraph (6) the following: (7) If the head of the agency managing any Federal property objects to such inclusion or designation for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes, that Federal property shall be neither included on the National Register nor designated as a National Historic Landmark until the objection is withdrawn. . (4) By adding after paragraph (9) (as so redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section) the following: (10) The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to allow for expedited removal of Federal property listed on the National Register of Historic Places if the managing agency of that Federal property submits to the Secretary a written request to remove the Federal property from the National Register of Historic Places for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes. . C Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 2831. Repeal or modification of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region Section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1016) is amended— (1) by striking subsections (a), (b), (c), and (e); (2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (f) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively; and (3) by inserting before subsection (b), as redesignated, the following new subsection (a): (a) Restriction on Development of Public Infrastructure (1) Restriction If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2015 under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding directly supports an infrastructure project agreed upon in the March 2011 Programmatic Agreement signed by the Department of Defense, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the Guam State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding the Military Relocation to the Islands of Guam and Tinian. (2) Public infrastructure defined In this subsection, term public infrastructure means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public. . D Land Conveyances 2841. Land conveyance, Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial, La Jolla, California (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of Defense may convey, without consideration, to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association, Inc. (in this section referred to as the Association), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in La Jolla, California, for the purpose of permitting the Association to maintain the property for public purposes. Upon conveyance of all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property under this subsection, the United States severs all involvement with the property and, notwithstanding the condition imposed by subsection (c), does not retain a reversionary interest for the enforcement of such condition. (b) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of Defense shall require the Association to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Association in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Association. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (c) Conditions on conveyance The conveyance of the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that a memorial shall be maintained and used as a veterans memorial in perpetuity. (d) Description of property The legal description of the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial is provided in section 2(d) of Public Law 109–272 (120 Stat. 771; 16 U.S.C. 431 note). (e) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of Defense may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2842. Land conveyance, former Walter Reed Army Hospital, District of Columbia (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to Children’s Hospital, nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the District of Columbia with its principal place of business in the District of Columbia (in this section referred to as the Children’s Hospital), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property at former Walter Reed Army Hospital in the District of Columbia consisting of approximately 13.25 acres and including building 54 (The Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Building and former Military Medical Museum), building 53 (former post theater), building 52 (warehouse and outpatient clinic), and building 3 (attached parking structure) for the purpose of permitting Children’s Hospital to use the parcel for public-benefit purposes. (b) Condition on use of revenues If the property conveyed under subsection (a) is used for a public-benefit purpose that results in the generation of revenue for Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital shall agree to use the generated revenue only for medical research purposes by depositing the revenues in fund designated for medical research use. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Army shall require Children’s Hospital to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from Children’s Hospital in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to Children’s Hospital. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (d) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army. (e) Relation to other laws Section 2905(b) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect to the real property authorized for conveyance under subsection (a). (f) Reversionary interest If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that Children’s Hospital has violated the condition on the use of revenues imposed by subsection (b), all right, title, and interest in and to such real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. (g) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2843. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia (a) Transfers Required (1) Camp Frank D. Merrill Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for required Army force protection measures certain Federal land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest, but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately 282.304 acres identified in the permit numbered 0018–01. (2) Lake lanier property In exchange for the land transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army (acting through the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture certain Federal land administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville, Georgia. (b) Use of Transferred Land (1) Camp Frank D. Merrill Upon receipt of the land under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall continue to use the land for military purposes. (2) Lake lanier property Upon receipt of the land under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the land for administrative purposes. (c) Protection of the Etowah Darter and Holiday Darter Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the prior designation of lands within the Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter (Etheostoma brevirostrum). (d) Legal Description and Map (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of both parcels of land to be transferred under subsection (a). (2) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) for a parcel of land shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretaries may correct errors in the legal description and map. (e) Reimbursements of Costs The transfers required by subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of Agriculture for any costs incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture to assist in the preparation of the legal description and maps required by subsection (d). 2844. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (in this section referred to as the Honolulu Authority), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1.2 acres at or in the nearby vicinity of Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the Honolulu Authority to use the property for public purposes. (b) Condition on use of revenues If the property conveyed under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for a public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for the Honolulu Authority, the Honolulu Authority shall agree to use the generated revenue only for passenger rail transit purposes by depositing the revenue in a fund designated for passenger rail transit use. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Honolulu Authority in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Honolulu Authority. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (d) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. (e) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2845. Modification of conditions on land conveyance, Joliet Army Ammunition Plant, Illinois Section 2922(c)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (division B of Public Law 104–106; 110 Stat. 605), as added by section 2842 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 863) is amended in the second sentence, by striking 23 years of operation and inserting 38 years of operation. 2846. Land conveyance, Robert H. Dietz Army Reserve Center, Kingston, New York (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to the City of Kingston, New York (in this section referred to as the City), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 4 acres and containing the Robert H. Dietz Army Reserve Center located at 144 Flatbush Avenue in Kingston, New York, for the purpose of permitting the City to use the parcel for public purposes. (b) Reversionary interest If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and to such real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. (c) Alternative consideration option (1) Fair market value In lieu of exercising the reversionary interest under subsection (b) if the Secretary of the Army determines that the conveyed property is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance, the Secretary may require the City to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the property, as determined pursuant to paragraph (2). (2) Appraisal; adjustment The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the property through an appraisal conducted by a licensed, independent appraiser acceptable to the Secretary and the City. The fair market value of the property shall be adjusted to exclude the value of any improvements on the property constructed by the City. (d) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Army shall require the City to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (e) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2847. Exercise of reversionary interest, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma (a) Business case analysis Not later than March 31, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall perform a business case analysis to consider the merits of seeking, for use as military maneuver space, the reversion of former Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, which— (1) consists of approximately 31,283.66 acres; and (2) was conveyed to the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife in 1948 subject to a reversionary clause that gives the United States the right to reacquire the land if needed for national defense purposes. (b) Exercise of reversionary right If, as a result of the business case analysis required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army determines that reacquisition of former Camp Gruber is needed for national defense purposes, the Secretary shall exercise the reversionary right and request the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife to reconvey Camp Gruber to the United States. (c) Conveyance to Oklahoma military department If Camp Gruber is reacquired by the United States under subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army shall convey, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to Camp Gruber to the Oklahoma Military Department for the purpose of permitting the Oklahoma Military Department to use Camp Gruber as military maneuver space. (d) Consultation requirement The Secretary of the Army shall conduct the business case analysis required by subsection (a) and make the determination under subsection (b) in consultation with the Adjutant General of the Oklahoma Military Department. (e) Structures and improvements The reacquisition of Camp Gruber under this section shall include the improvements, structures, and fixtures located at Camp Gruber and related personal property. (f) Costs (1) Costs of exercising reversion The Secretary of the Army shall be responsible for all reasonable and necessary costs associated with exercising the reversionary interest under subsection (b) and reacquiring Camp Gruber, including real estate transaction and environmental documentation costs. (2) Costs of subsequent conveyance (A) Payment required The Secretary of the Army shall require the Oklahoma Military Department to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (c), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Oklahoma Military Department in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Oklahoma Military Department. (B) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under subparagraph (A) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (g) Prohibition on use of Operation and Maintenance funds Notwithstanding subsection (f), the Secretary of the Army may not use amounts appropriated for operation and maintenance for the Army for the purpose of establishing, reactivating, modernizing, or sustaining any portion of Camp Gruber reacquired by the United States under subsection (b). (h) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (c) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2848. Land conveyance, Hanford Site, Washington (a) Conveyance required (1) In general Not later than December 31, 2014, the Secretary of Energy shall convey to the Community Reuse Organization of the Hanford Site (in this section referred to as the Organization) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to two parcels of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1,341 acres and 300 acres, respectively, of the Hanford Reservation, as requested by the Organization on May 31, 2011, and October 13, 2011, and as depicted within the proposed boundaries on the map titled Attachment 2–Revised Map included in the October 13, 2011, letter. (2) Modification of conveyance Upon the agreement of the Secretary and the Organization, the Secretary may adjust the boundaries of one or both of the parcels specified for conveyance under paragraph (1). (b) Consideration As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the Organization shall pay to the United States an amount equal to the estimated fair market value of the conveyed real property, as determined by the Secretary of Energy, except that the Secretary may convey the property without consideration or for consideration below the estimated fair market value of the property if the Organization— (1) agrees that the net proceeds from any sale or lease of the property (or any portion thereof) received by the Organization during at least the seven-year period beginning on the date of such conveyance will be used to support the economic redevelopment of, or related to, the Hanford Site; and (2) executes the agreement for such conveyance and accepts control of the real property within a reasonable time. (c) Expedited Notification to Congress Except as provided in subsection (d)(2), the enactment of this section shall be construed to satisfy any notice to Congress otherwise required for the land conveyance required by this section. (d) Additional terms and conditions (1) In general The Secretary of Energy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary deems necessary to protect the interests of the United States. (2) Congressional notification If the Secretary uses the authority provided by paragraph (1) to impose a term or condition on the conveyance, the Secretary shall submit to Congress written notice of the term or condition and the reason for imposing the term or condition. E Other Matters 2861. Memorial to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard (a) Memorial authorized The Secretary of the Navy may establish on the grounds of the Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia a memorial dedicated to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard that occurred on September 16, 2013. (b) Establishment, maintenance, and repair The Secretary of the Navy shall be responsible for the establishment, maintenance, and repair of the memorial. (c) Acceptance of contributions; use (1) Acceptance of contributions The Secretary of the Navy may solicit and accept monetary contributions and gifts of property for the purpose of establishing, maintaining, and repairing the memorial without regard to limitations contained in section 2601 of title 10, United States Code. (2) Establishment of account There is established on the books of the Treasury an account for the deposit of monetary contributions received pursuant to paragraph (1). (3) Deposit and availability of contributions The Secretary of the Navy shall deposit monetary contributions accepted under paragraph (1) in the account. The funds in the account shall be available to the Secretary, until expended and without further appropriation, but only for the establishment, maintenance, and repair of the memorial. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (a) Redesignation The Department of Defense regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (b) Conforming amendments (1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies and inserting Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (2) Acceptance of gifts and donations Section 2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies and inserting Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (c) References Any reference to the Department of Defense Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. 2863. Redesignation of Pohakuloa Training Area in Hawaii as Pohakuloa Training Center (a) Redesignation The Pohakuloa Training Area in the State of Hawaii is hereby renamed the Pohakuloa Training Center. (b) References Any reference to the Pohakuloa Training Area in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Pohakuloa Training Center. 2864. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in Riverside, California (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II, approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of conflict. (2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented. Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the medal and are undocumented. (3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic deeds performed in aerial flight. (4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California. (5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves in aerial flight, whether documentation of such members who earned the Distinguished Flying Cross exists or not. (b) Designation The memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial. (c) Effect of designation The national memorial designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park System, and the designation of the national memorial shall not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose related to the national memorial. 2865. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking Aviation Center and inserting National Museum. 2866. Manhattan Project National Historical Park (a) Purposes The purposes of this section are— (1) to preserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the nationally significant historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project and which are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy defense environmental cleanup program under this title; (2) to improve public understanding of the Manhattan Project and the legacy of the Manhattan Project through interpretation of the historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project; (3) to enhance public access to the Historical Park consistent with protection of public safety, national security, and other aspects of the mission of the Department of Energy; and (4) to assist the Department of Energy, Historical Park communities, historical societies, and other interested organizations and individuals in efforts to preserve and protect the historically significant resources associated with the Manhattan Project. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Historical park The term Historical Park means the Manhattan Project National Historical Park established under subsection (c). (2) Manhattan project The term Manhattan Project means the Federal military program to develop an atomic bomb ending on December 31, 1946. (3) Secretary The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior. (c) Establishment of manhattan project national historical park (1) Establishment (A) Date Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, there shall be established as a unit of the National Park System the Manhattan Project National Historical Park. (B) Areas included The Historical Park shall consist of facilities and areas listed under paragraph (2) as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy. The Secretary shall include the area referred to in paragraph (2)(C)(i), the B Reactor National Historic Landmark, in the Historical Park. (2) Eligible areas The Historical Park may only be comprised of one or more of the following areas, or portions of the areas, as generally depicted in the map titled Manhattan Project National Historical Park Sites, numbered 540/108,834–C, and dated September 2012: (A) Oak ridge, Tennessee Facilities, land, or interests in land that are— (i) at Buildings 9204–3 and 9731 at the Department of Energy Y–12 National Security Complex; (ii) at the X–10 Graphite Reactor at the Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory; (iii) at the K–25 Building site at the Department of Energy East Tennessee Technology Park; and (iv) at the former Guest House located at 210 East Madison Road. (B) Los Alamos, New Mexico Facilities, land, or interests in land that are— (i) in the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory National Historic Landmark District, or any addition to the Landmark District proposed in the National Historic Landmark Nomination—Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) NHL District (Working Draft of NHL Revision), Los Alamos National Laboratory document LA–UR 12–00387 (January 26, 2012); (ii) at the former East Cafeteria located at 1670 Nectar Street; and (iii) at the former dormitory located at 1725 17th Street. (C) Hanford, Washington Facilities, land, or interests in land on the Department of Energy Hanford Nuclear Reservation that are— (i) the B Reactor National Historic Landmark; (ii) the Hanford High School in the town of Hanford and Hanford Construction Camp Historic District; (iii) the White Bluffs Bank building in the White Bluffs Historic District; (iv) the warehouse at the Bruggemann’s Agricultural Complex; (v) the Hanford Irrigation District Pump House; and (vi) the T Plant (221–T Process Building). (3) Written consent of owner No non-Federal property may be included in the Historical Park without the written consent of the owner. (d) Agreement (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy (acting through the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Richland site offices) shall enter into an agreement governing the respective roles of the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy in administering the facilities, land, or interests in land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of Energy that is to be included in the Historical Park under subsection (c)(2), including provisions for enhanced public access, management, interpretation, and historic preservation. (2) Responsibilities of the Secretary Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary shall— (A) have decisionmaking authority for the content of historic interpretation of the Manhattan Project for purposes of administering the Historical Park; and (B) ensure that the agreement provides an appropriate advisory role for the National Park Service in preserving the historic resources covered by the agreement. (3) Responsibilities of the secretary of energy Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary of Energy— (A) shall ensure that the agreement appropriately protects public safety, national security, and other aspects of the ongoing mission of the Department of Energy at the Oak Ridge Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford Site; (B) may consult with and provide historical information to the Secretary concerning the Manhattan Project; (C) shall retain responsibility, in accordance with applicable law, for any environmental remediation that may be necessary in or around the facilities, land, or interests in land governed by the agreement; and (D) shall retain authority and legal obligations for historic preservation and general maintenance, including to ensure safe access, in connection with the Department’s Manhattan Project resources. (4) Amendments The agreement under paragraph (1) may be amended, including to add to the Historical Park facilities, land, or interests in land within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that are under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy. (e) Public participation (1) In general The Secretary shall consult with interested State, county, and local officials, organizations, and interested members of the public— (A) before executing any agreement under subsection (d); and (B) in the development of the general management plan under subsection (f)(2). (2) Notice of determination Not later than 30 days after the date on which an agreement under subsection (d) is entered into, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the establishment of the Historical Park, including an official boundary map. (3) Availability of map The official boundary map published under paragraph (2) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. The map shall be updated to reflect any additions to the Historical Park from eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2). (4) Additions Any land, interest in land, or facility within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that is acquired by the Secretary or included in an amendment to the agreement under subsection (d)(4) shall be added to the Historical Park. (f) Administration (1) In general The Secretary shall administer the Historical Park in accordance with— (A) this section; and (B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including— (i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and (ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). (2) General management plan Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Energy, and in consultation and collaboration with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Richland Department of Energy site offices, shall complete a general management plan for the Historical Park in accordance with section 12(b) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the National Park Service General Authorities Act; 16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)). (3) Interpretive tours The Secretary may, subject to applicable law, provide interpretive tours of historically significant Manhattan Project sites and resources in the States of Tennessee, New Mexico, and Washington that are located outside the boundary of the Historical Park. (4) Land acquisition (A) In general The Secretary may acquire land and interests in land within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) by— (i) transfer of administrative jurisdiction from the Department of Energy by agreement between the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy; (ii) donation; or (iii) exchange. (B) No use of condemnation The Secretary may not acquire by condemnation any land or interest in land under this section or for the purposes of this section. (5) Donations; cooperative agreements (A) Federal facilities (i) In general The Secretary may enter into one or more agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide public access to, and management, interpretation, and historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan Project resources under the jurisdiction or control of the Federal agency. (ii) Donations; cooperative agreements The Secretary may accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements with, State governments, units of local government, tribal governments, organizations, or individuals to further the purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under clause (i) or to provide visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park. (B) Technical assistance The Secretary may provide technical assistance to State, local, or tribal governments, organizations, or individuals for the management, interpretation, and historic preservation of historically significant Manhattan Project resources not included within the Historical Park. (C) Donations to department of energy For the purposes of this section, or for the purpose of preserving and providing access to historically significant Manhattan Project resources, the Secretary of Energy may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including labor and services). (g) Clarification (1) No buffer zone created Nothing in this section, the establishment of the Historical Park, or the management plan for the Historical Park shall be construed to create buffer zones outside of the Historical Park. That an activity can be seen and heard from within the Historical Park shall not preclude the conduct of that activity or use outside the Historical Park. (2) No cause of action Nothing in this section shall constitute a cause of action with respect to activities outside or adjacent to the established boundary of the Historical Park. XXIX Military Land Transfers and Withdrawals to Support Readiness and Security A Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada 2901. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, the Federal land described in subsection (b). (b) Description of Federal land The Federal land referred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior that— (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill County, Nevada; and (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV–943–4214–10; N–37875). (c) Management On transfer of the Federal land described under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody, and control of the Federal land. 2902. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. 2903. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be transferred under section 2901 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws, so long as the land remains under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. B Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 2911. Redesignation of Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area, California (a) Redesignation The Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area in California is hereby redesignated as the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. (b) Conforming amendments Subtitle C of title XXIX of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66) is amended— (1) in section 2942(c)(3) (127 Stat. 1037), by striking Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Areaand inserting Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area; and (2) in section 2945 (127 Stat. 1038)— (A) in the section heading, by inserting national after valley; (B) in subsection (a), by inserting National after Valley in the matter preceding paragraph (1); and (C) in subsections (b), (c), and (d), by inserting National after Valley each place it appears. (c) Relation to authorized Navy use The redesignation of the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area as the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area does not alter or interfere with the rights and obligations of the Navy regarding the use of portions of the Recreation Area as provided in subtitle C of title XXIX of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1034). (d) References Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is deemed to be a reference to the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. C Bureau of Land Management Withdrawn Military Lands Efficiency and Savings 2921. Elimination of termination date for public land withdrawals and reservations under Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (a) Elimination of termination date Section 3015(a) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 892) is amended by striking shall the first place it appears and all that follows through the period and inserting shall not terminate other than by an election and determination of the Secretary of the military department concerned or until such time as the Secretary of the Interior can permanently transfer administrative jurisdiction of the lands withdrawn and reserved by this Act to the Secretary of the military department concerned.. (b) Conforming amendment Section 3016 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 893) is repealed. D Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California (a) Permanent withdrawal and reservation Section 2979 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1047) is amended to read as follows: 2979. Permanent withdrawal and reservation The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2971 shall not terminate, except pursuant to— (1) an election and determination by the Secretary of the Navy to relinquish the land under section 2922; or (2) a transfer by the Secretary of the Interior of permanent administrative jurisdiction over the land to the Secretary of the Navy. . (b) Withdrawal and reservation of additional public land Section 2971(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1044) is amended— (1) by striking The public land and inserting the following: (1) Initial withdrawal The public land ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Additional withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the public land (including interests in land) referred to in subsection (a) also includes the approximately 26,313 acres of public land in San Bernardino County, California, identified as Proposed Navy Acquisition Area (but excluding the parcel identified as AF Fee Simple) on the map entitled Cuddeback Land Area and dated April 1, 2014, and filed in accordance with section 2912, except that the withdrawal area specifically excludes any public land included within the Grass Valley Wilderness and all private lands otherwise located within the boundaries of the withdrawal area. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the owners of the excluded private land continue to have reasonable access to their private land. . (c) Management of additional public land Section 2973 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1045) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Additional management considerations for certain lands Subject to existing laws and to the extent possible without compromising mission readiness, the Secretary of the Navy shall manage the additional lands withdrawn by section 2971(b)(2) to protect existing historic, economic, cultural, recreational, hunting, and scientific features and uses, including access to existing roadways and trails. . E White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico 2941. Additional withdrawal and reservation of public land to support White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Section 2951(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1039) is amended— (1) by striking The Federal land and inserting the following: (1) Initial withdrawal The Federal land ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Northern Extension Area The Federal land referred to in subsection (a) also includes the Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management located beneath the boundaries of the Special Use Airspace Areas designated as R-5107C and R-5107H for White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, as described in Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7400.8W dated February 16, 2014. . C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS XXXI Department of Energy National Security Programs A National Security Programs Authorizations 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: Project 15-D-613, Emergency Operations Center, Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, $2,000,000.Project 15-D-612, Emergency Operations Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, $2,000,000.Project 15-D-611, Emergency Operations Center, Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico, $4,000,000.Project 15-D-302, TA-55 Reinvestment Project Phase III, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $16,062,000.Project 15-D-301, High Explosive Science and Engineering Facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas, $11,800,000.Project 15-D-904, NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $400,000.Project 15-D-903, KL Fire System Upgrade, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $600,000.Project 15-D-902, KS Engineroom Team Trainer Facility, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York, $1,500,000.Project 15-D-901, KS Central Office and Prototype Staff Building, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York, $24,000,000. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of new plant projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects: Project 15–D–401, KW Basin Sludge Removal Project, Hanford, Washington, $26,290,000. Project 15–D–402, Saltstone Disposal Unit #6, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, $34,642,000.Project 15–D–405, Sludge Processing Facility Build Out, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, $4,200,000. Project 15–D–406, Hexavalent Chromium Pump and Treatment Remedy Project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $28,600,000. Project 15–D–409, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford, Washington, $23,000,000. 3103. Other Defense Activities Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3104. Energy Security and Assurance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for energy security and assurance programs necessary for national security as specified in the funding table in section 4701. B Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 3111. Design and use of prototypes of nuclear weapons for intelligence purposes (a) In general Subsection (a) of section 4509 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2660) is amended to read as follows: (a) Prototypes (1) Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the budget for fiscal year 2016, the directors of the national security laboratories shall jointly develop a multiyear plan to design and build prototypes of nuclear weapons to further intelligence estimates with respect to foreign nuclear weapons activities and capabilities. (2) Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the budget for an even-numbered fiscal year occurring after fiscal year 2017, the directors shall jointly develop an update to the plan developed under paragraph (1). (3) (A) The directors shall jointly submit to the Secretary of Energy the plan and each update developed under paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively. (B) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the directors submit the plan and each update under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees such plan and each such update, without change. (4) (A) The Secretary, in coordination with the directors of the nuclear weapons laboratories, shall carry out the plan developed under paragraph (1), including the updates to the plan developed under paragraph (2). (B) The Secretary may determine the manner in which the designing and building of prototypes of nuclear weapons is carried out under such plan. (C) The Secretary shall promptly submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of any changes the Secretary makes to such plan pursuant to subparagraph (B), including justifications for such changes. . (b) Matters included Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: (b) Matters included (1) The directors shall ensure that the plan developed and updated under subsection (a) provides increased information upon which to base intelligence assessments and emphasizes the competencies of the national security laboratories with respect to designing and building prototypes of nuclear weapons. (2) To carry out paragraph (1), the plan developed and updated under subsection (a) shall include the following: (A) Design and system engineering activities of full-scale engineering prototypes (using surrogate special nuclear materials), including weaponization features as required. (B) Design, system engineering, and experimental testing (using surrogate special nuclear materials) of above-ground experiment test hardware. (C) Design and system engineering of scaled or subcomponent experimental test articles (using special nuclear materials) for conducting experiments at the Nevada National Security Site. . (c) Conforming amendment Subsection (c) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b), is amended by striking subsection (a), the Administrator and inserting this section, the Secretary. 3112. Authorized personnel levels of National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Full-time equivalent personnel levels Subsection (a) of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking 2014 and inserting 2015; and (B) by striking 1,825 and inserting 1,650; and (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking 2015 and inserting 2016; and (B) by striking 1,825 and inserting 1,650. (b) Definition Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Office of the Administrator employees In this section, the term Office of the Administrator, with respect to the employees of the Administration, includes employees whose funding is derived from an account of the Administration titled Federal Salaries and Expenses. . 3113. Cost containment for Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the April 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, a February 2011 letter from the President to the Senate, and many other policy statements and documents have identified the Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project as a critical nuclear modernization priority; (2) the failure of the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration to successfully and efficiently execute and oversee the Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project undermines national security and jeopardizes the long-term credibility of the nuclear deterrent; (3) the April 8, 2014, testimony of the Acting Administrator for Nuclear Security that close to half of the $1,200,000,000 taxpayers have spent on the design of such project has been wasted is a grievous misuse of limited taxpayer funds, and the appropriate officials of the Federal Government and contractors must be held accountable; (4) the uranium capabilities and modern infrastructure that are to be provided by all three phases of the Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project are critical to national security and Congress fully supports efforts to deliver all of these capabilities efficiently and expeditiously; (5) focused attention and robust leadership from the highest levels of the executive branch and Congress are required to ensure that such project delivers such critical national security capabilities; and (6) the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator for Nuclear Security must ensure that lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability for such project are clear going forward. (b) Cost and oversight of project Section 3123 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2178), as amended by section 3126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1063), is amended— (1) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) Cost of Phase I (1) Limitation The total cost of Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in such subsection may not exceed $4,200,000,000. (2) Adjustment If the Secretary determines the total cost of Phase I will exceed the amount set forth in paragraph (1), the Secretary may adjust such amount if, by not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a detailed justification for such adjustment, including— (A) the amount of the adjustment and the proposed total cost of Phase I; (B) a detailed justification for such adjustment, including a description of the changes that would be required to the project referred to in subsection (a) if Phase I were to not exceed the total cost set forth in paragraph (1); (C) a detailed description of the actions taken to hold appropriate contractors, employees of contractors, and employees of the Federal Government accountable for the repeated failures within the project; (D) a description of the clear lines of responsibility, authority, and accountability for the project as the project continues, including descriptions of the roles and responsibilities for each key Federal and contractor position; and (E) a detailed description of the structural reforms planned or implemented by the Secretary to ensure Phase I is executed on time and on schedule. (3) Annual certification Not later than March 1 of each year through 2025, the Secretary shall certify in writing to the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of Defense that Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in such subsection will meet— (A) the total cost set forth in paragraph (1) (as adjusted pursuant to paragraph (2) if so adjusted); and (B) a schedule that enables, by not later than 2025— (i) uranium operations in building 9212 to cease; and (ii) uranium operations in a new facility constructed under such project to begin. (4) Report If the Secretary of Energy does not make a certification by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required under paragraph (3), by not later than May 1 of such year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that identifies the resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman determines should be redirected to enable the Department of Energy to meet the total cost and schedule described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of such paragraph. ; (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Report Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the implementation of paragraphs (1) and (2), including— (A) a description of the program management, oversight, design, and other responsibilities for the project referred to in subsection (a) that are provided to the Commander of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command pursuant to paragraph (1); and (B) a description of the funding used by the Secretary under paragraph (2) to carry out paragraph (1). ; and (3) by striking subsections (g) and (h). 3114. Plutonium pit production capacity (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In 2008, the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, agreed on a strategy to balance cost, risk, and stockpile needs and established the requirement for the Department of Energy to produce 50 to 80 plutonium pits per year. (2) In a memorandum of agreement dated May 3, 2010, entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, the Secretaries agreed that the Department of Energy would achieve a minimum pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits per year by 2022. (3) The current plans of the Secretary of Energy would achieve a pit production capacity of 50 to 80 pits per year by 2031, resulting in a delay of nearly a decade as compared to the agreement described in paragraph (2). (4) In a report dated January 14, 2014, that the Secretary of Defense submitted to Congress, the Secretary stated that the Department of Defense has revalidated its requirement for 50 – 80 pits per year based on the demands of stockpile modernization, the commitments to a modern physical infrastructure, and the ability to hedge against technical failure or geopolitical risk.. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the requirement to create a modern, responsive nuclear infrastructure that includes the capability and capacity to produce, at minimum, 50 to 80 pits per year, is a national security priority; (2) delaying creation of a modern, responsive nuclear infrastructure until the 2030s is an unacceptable risk to the nuclear deterrent and the national security of the United States; and (3) timelines for creating certain capacities for production of plutonium pits and other nuclear weapons components must be driven by the requirement to hedge against technical and geopolitical risk and not solely by the needs of life extension programs. (c) Pit production (1) In general Title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4218 the following new section: 4219. Plutonium pit production capacity (a) Requirement Consistent with the requirements of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the nuclear security enterprise— (1) during 2023, produces not less than 30 war reserve plutonium pits; (2) during 2026, produces not less than 50 war reserve plutonium pits; and (3) during a pilot period of not less than 90 days during 2027, demonstrates the capability to produce war reserve plutonium pits at a rate sufficient to produce 80 pits per year. (b) Annual certification Not later than March 1, 2015, and each year thereafter through 2027, the Secretary shall certify to the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of Defense that the programs and budget of the Secretary will enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under subsection (a). (c) Plan If the Secretary does not make a certification by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required under subsection (b), by not later than May 1 of such year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under subsection (b). Such plan shall include identification of the resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman determines should be redirected to support the plan to meet such requirements. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4218 the following new item: Sec. 4219. Plutonium pit production capacity. . 3115. Definition of baseline and threshold for stockpile life extension project Section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by adding after the period the following new sentence: In addition to the requirement under subparagraph (B), the cost and schedule baseline of a nuclear stockpile life extension project established under this subparagraph shall be the cost and schedule as determined by the weapon design and cost report required prior to the project entering into the development engineering phase.; and (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking 200 and inserting 150. 3116. Production of nuclear warhead for long-range standoff weapon (a) First production unit The Secretary of Energy shall deliver a first production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025. (b) Plan (1) Development The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly develop a plan to carry out subsection (a). (2) Submission Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees the plan developed under paragraph (1). (c) Notification and assessment (1) Notification If at any time the Secretary of Energy determines that the Secretary will not deliver a first production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees, the Secretary of Defense, and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command of such determination, including an explanation for why the delivery will be delayed. (2) Assessment If the Secretary of Energy makes a notification under paragraph (1), the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the delay described in the notification, including— (A) the effects of such delay to national security and nuclear deterrence and assurance; and (B) any mitigation options available. (d) Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the justification of the long-range standoff weapon, including— (1) why such weapon is needed, including any potential redundancies with existing weapons; (2) the cost of such weapon; and (3) what warhead, existing or otherwise, is planned to be used for such weapon. 3117. Disposition of weapons-usable plutonium (a) Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility (1) In general Of the funds described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and program support activities relating to the MOX facility. (2) Funds described The funds described in this paragraph are the following: (A) Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and program support activities. (B) Funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year prior to fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the MOX facility for construction and program support activities that are unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Study (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to assess and validate the analysis of the Secretary of Energy with respect to surplus weapon-grade plutonium options. (2) Submission Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any findings and recommendations. (c) Report (1) Plan Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (b)(1). (2) Elements included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The study conducted by the federally funded research and development center under subsection (b)(1), without change. (B) Identification of the alternatives to the MOX facility considered by the Secretary, including a life-cycle cost analysis for each such alternative. (C) Identification of the portions of such life cycle cost analyses that are common to all such alternatives. (D) Discussion on continuation of the MOX facility, including a future funding profile or a detailed discussion of selected alternatives determined appropriate by the Secretary for such discussion. (E) Discussion of the issues regarding implementation of such selected alternatives, including all regulatory and public acceptance issues, including interactions with affected States. (F) Explanation of how the alternatives to the MOX facility conform with the Plutonium Disposition Agreement, and if an alternative does not so conform, what measures must be taken to ensure conformance. (G) Identification of steps the Secretary would have to take to close out all MOX facility related activities, as well as the associated cost. (H) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term MOX facility means the mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina. (2) The term Plutonium Disposition Agreement means the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated As No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation, as amended. (3) The term program support activities means activities that support the design, long-lead equipment procurement, and site preparation of the MOX facility. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until— (1) the President transmits to Congress the matters required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(f)(2)); (2) the President transmits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters— (A) required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576); and (B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy is responsible; (3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the report required to be submitted during 2015 under section 3122(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); and (4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted during 2015 under section 4203(b)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)). (b) Office of the Administrator defined In this section, the term Office of the Administrator, with respect to accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration, includes any account from which funds are derived for Federal Salaries and Expenses. 3119. Additional limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security (a) Limitation In addition to the limitation in section 3118, of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that fiscal year, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the efficiencies proposed by the study titled 2012 Joint DOE/DoD Study on Potential NNSA Management and Work Force Prioritization Efficiencies conducted jointly by the Administrator and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. Such report shall include details on how the Administrator will carry out during fiscal year 2015 each efficiency measure proposed by such joint study. (b) Report Not later than March 1, 2015, the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: (1) The efficiencies that the Council recommends the Administrator to carry out during fiscal year 2016. (2) An assessment by the Council of— (A) the report submitted by the Administrator under subsection (a)(1) of section 3123 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1711); (B) the report submitted by the Comptroller General of the United States under subsection (b) of such section; and (C) each of the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (a)(2) of such section. (c) Office of the Administrator defined In this section, the term Office of the Administrator, with respect to accounts of the National Nuclear Security Administration, includes any account from which funds are derived for Federal Salaries and Expenses. 3120. Limitation on availability of funds for nonproliferation activities between the United States and the Russian Federation (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be used for any contact, cooperation, or transfer of technology between the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that— (1) the armed forces of the Russian Federation are no longer illegally occupying Ukrainian territory; (2) the Russian Federation is respecting the sovereignty of all Ukrainian territory; (3) the Russian Federation is no longer acting inconsistently with the INF Treaty; and (4) the Russian Federation is in compliance with the CFE Treaty and has lifted its suspension of Russian observance of its treaty obligations. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Energy may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if— (1) the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, submits to the appropriate congressional committees— (A) a notification that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States and a description of the national security interests covered by the waiver; and (B) a report explaining why the Secretary of Energy cannot make a certification for such under subsection (a); and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the information in the report under paragraph (1)(B). (c) Exception for certain military bases The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine. (d) Application The limitation in subsection (a) applies with respect to funds described in such subsection that are unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (A) The congressional defense committees. (B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) The term CFE Treaty means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992. (3) The term INF Treaty means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988. 3121. Limitation on availability of funds for defense nuclear nonproliferation activities at sites in the Russian Federation (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for defense nuclear nonproliferation activities may be obligated or expended for such activities at sites in the Russian Federation until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Energy certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that such sites are not actively engaged in Russian nuclear weapons, intelligence, or defense activities. (b) Waiver The President, without delegation, may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees— (1) notification that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and (2) certification that none of the funds described in subsection (a) will be contributed to the nuclear weapons program of Russia. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. C Plans and Reports 3131. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security Administration Section 3221(h) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Administration The term Administration, with respect to any authority, duty, or responsibility provided by this section, does not include the Office of Naval Reactors. . 3132. Analysis and report on W88 Alt 370 program high explosives options (a) Report required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the W88 Alt 370 program that contains analyses of the costs, benefits, risks, and feasibility of each of the following options: (1) Incorporating a refresh of the conventional high explosives of the W88 warhead as part of such program. (2) Not incorporating such a refresh as part of such program. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include, for each option described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), an analysis of the following: (1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, including costs to both the Navy and the National Nuclear Security Administration. (2) Potential cost avoidance. (3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the capacity and throughput of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (4) The expected longevity of the W88 warhead. (5) Near-term and long-term safety and security risks and potential risk-mitigation measures. (6) Any other matters the Secretary, the Administrator, or the Chairman considers appropriate. 3133. Analysis of existing facilities (a) Report Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an analysis of using or modifying existing facilities across the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) to support the plutonium strategy of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An analysis of the costs, benefits, cost-savings, risks, and effects of using or modifying existing facilities of the nuclear security enterprise as compared to the current plan of the Administrator for supporting the plutonium strategy of the Administration, including all phases of the plan. (2) Such other matters as the Administrator determines appropriate. D Other matters 3141. Technical corrections to Atomic Energy Defense Act (a) Definitions Section 4002(3) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(3)) is amended by striking Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 401 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 435 note), and inserting Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 3001 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note), Executive Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note),. (b) Management structure Section 4102(b)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2512(b)(3)) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking for improving the; (2) in subparagraph (A), by inserting for improving the before governance; and (3) in subparagraph (B), by inserting relating to before any other. (c) Stockpile stewardship Section 4203(d)(4)(A)(i) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(d)(4)(A)(i)) is amended by striking 50 U.S.C. 404a and inserting 50 U.S.C. 3043. (d) Reports on stockpile Section 4205(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)(2)) is amended by striking commander and inserting Commander. (e) Advice on reliability of stockpile Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended— (1) in subsection (d), by striking commander and inserting Commander; and (2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking representatives and inserting a representative. (f) Disposition of certain plutonium Section 4306 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2566) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(6)(C), by striking paragraph (A) and inserting subparagraph (A); (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking 2002 and inserting 2002,; and (3) in subsection (d)(3), by inserting of Energy after Department. (g) Limitation on use of funds in relation to F-Canyon Facility Section 4454 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2638) is amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting of after assessment. (h) Inspections of certain facilities Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking nuclear weapons facility and inserting national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility. (i) Notice relating to certain failures Section 4505 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656) is amended— (1) in subsection (b), by striking the subsection heading and inserting the following: Significant atomic energy defense intelligence losses; and (2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking 50 U.S.C. 413 and inserting 50 U.S.C. 3091. (j) Review of certain documents before declassification and release Section 4521(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671(b)) is amended by striking Executive Order 12958 and inserting Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note). (k) Protection against release of Restricted Data Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note) and inserting Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note); (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking Executive Order No. 12958 and inserting Executive Order No. 13526; (3) in subsection (f)(2), by striking Executive Order No. 12958 and inserting Executive Order No. 13526. (l) Identification of declassification activities in budget materials Section 4525(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675(a)) is amended by striking Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note) and inserting Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note). (m) Workforce restructuring plan Section 4604(f)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704(f)(3)) is amended by striking Nevada and and inserting Nevada, and. (n) Availability of funds Section 4709(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2749(b)) is amended by striking athorization and inserting authorization. (o) Transfer of defense environmental cleanup funds Section 4710(b)(3)(B) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750(b)(3)(B)) is amended by striking management and inserting cleanup. (p) Restriction on use of funds to pay certain penalties Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended— (1) by inserting an em dash after Department of Energy if; (2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be indented two ems from the left margin; and (3) in paragraph (1), by striking , or and inserting ; or. (q) Research and development by certain facilities Section 4832(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812(a)) is amended by striking for Nuclear Security. (r) Report on Hanford tank safety Section 4441 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2621) is amended by striking subsection (d). (s) Critical technology partnerships Section 4813(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794(a)) is amended by striking that atomic energy defense activities research on, and development of, any dual-use critical technology and inserting that research on and development of dual-use critical technology carried out through atomic energy defense activities. (t) Table of contents The table of contents for such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4710 and inserting the following: Sec. 4710. Transfer of defense environmental cleanup funds. . 3142. Technical corrections to National Nuclear Security Administration Act (a) Status of certain personnel Section 3220(c) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2410(c)) is amended— (1) by inserting an em dash after activities between; (2) by realigning paragraphs (1) and (2) so as to be indented two ems from the left margin; and (3) in paragraph (1), by striking , and and inserting ; and. (b) Congressional oversight of certain programs Section 3236(a)(2)(B)(iv) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2426(a)(2)(B)(iv)) is amended— (1) by inserting an em dash after program for; (2) by realigning subclauses (I), (II), and (III) so as to be indented six ems from the left margin; and (3) in subclause (I), by striking year, and inserting year; and (4) in subclause (II), by striking , and and inserting ; and. XXXII Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 3201. Authorization There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015, $30,150,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 3202. Inspector General of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Subsection (a) of section 322 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286k(a)) is amended to read as follows: (a) In general The Inspector General of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall serve as the Inspector General of the Board, in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). . 3203. Number of employees of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (a) In general Section 313(b)(1)(A) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking 150 full-time employees and inserting 120 full-time employees. (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2015. XXXIV Naval Petroleum Reserves 3401. Authorization of appropriations (a) Amount There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $19,950,000 for fiscal year 2015 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. (b) Period of availability Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available until expended. XXXV Maritime Administration 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2015 Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows: (1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $79,790,000, of which— (A) $65,290,000 shall remain available until expended for Academy operations; (B) $14,500,000 shall remain available until expended for capital asset management at the Academy. (2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $17,650,000, of which— (A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for student incentive payments; (B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for direct payments to such academies; (C) $11,300,000 shall remain available until expended for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training vessels; and (D) $350,000 shall remain available until expended for improving the monitoring of graduates’ service obligation. (3) For expenses necessary to support Maritime Administration operations and programs, $50,960,000. (4) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $4,800,000, to remain available until expended. (5) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $186,000,000. (6) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United States Code, $73,100,000, of which $3,100,000 shall remain available until expended for administrative expenses of the program. 3502. Special rule for DD-17 (a) In general A vessel of the Navy transported in DD-17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) in the waters of the State of Alabama shall not be treated as merchandise for purposes of section 55102 of title 46, United States Code. (b) Limitation If DD-17 (formerly known as USN-YFD-17) is sold after the date of the enactment of this Act, subsection (a) shall cease to have effect unless the purchaser of DD-17 is an eligible owner described in section 12103(b) of title 46, United States Code. 3503. Sense of Congress on the role of domestic maritime industry in national security (a) Findings Congress finds that— (1) the United States domestic maritime industry carries hundreds of million of tons of cargo annually, supports nearly 500,000 jobs, and provides nearly 100 billion in annual economic output; (2) the Nation’s military sealift capacity will benefit from one of the fastest growing segments of the domestic trades, 14 domestic trade tankers that are on order to be constructed at United States shipyards as of February 1, 2014; (3) the domestic trades’ vessel innovations that transformed worldwide maritime commerce include the development of containerships, self-unloading vessels, articulated tug-barges, trailer barges, chemical parcel tankers, railroad-on-barge carfloats, and river flotilla towing systems; (4) the national security benefits of the domestic maritime industry are unquestioned as the Department of Defense depends on United States domestic trades’ fleet of container ships, roll-on/roll-off ships, and product tankers to carry military cargoes; (5) the Department of Defense benefits from a robust commercial shipyard and ship repair industry and current growth in that sector is particularly important as Federal budget cuts may reduce the number of new constructed military vessels; and (6) the domestic fleet is essential to national security and was a primary source of mariners needed to crew United States Government-owned sealift vessels activated from reserve status during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom in the period 2002 through 2010. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that United States coastwise trade laws promote a strong domestic trade maritime industry, which supports the national security and economic vitality of the United States and the efficient operation of the United States transportation system. D Funding Tables 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables (a) In general Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations. (b) Merit-based decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. (c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. (d) Applicability to classified annex This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. (e) Oral and written communications No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. XLI Procurement 4101. Procurement SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 002UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT13,61713,617 003AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)185,090185,090 004MQ–1 UAV190,581239,581 Extended range modifications Per Army UFR[49,000] 005RQ–11 (RAVEN)3,9643,964 ROTARY 006HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)416,617416,617 007AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN494,009494,009 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)157,338157,338 012UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)1,237,0011,335,401 ARNG Modernization–6 additional UH–60M aircraft[98,400] 013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)132,138132,138 014CH–47 HELICOPTER892,504892,504 015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)102,361102,361 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 016MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP)26,91326,913 018GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)14,18214,182 019MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)131,892131,892 020AH–64 MODS181,869181,869 021CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)32,09232,092 022UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS15,02915,029 023UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS76,51583,315 ARNG Modernization-UH–60A to UH–60L conversions[6,800] 025NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN114,182114,182 026COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE115,795115,795 027GATM ROLLUP54,27754,277 028RQ–7 UAV MODS125,380125,380 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 029AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT66,45098,850 Army requested realignment[32,400] 030SURVIVABILITY CM7,800 Army requested realignment[7,800] 031CMWS107,36460,364 Army requested reduction[–47,000] OTHER SUPPORT 032AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT6,8476,847 033COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT29,23129,231 034AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS48,08148,081 035AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL127,232127,232 036INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES1,2031,203 037LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET2,9312,931 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY5,102,6855,250,085 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 002LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD)110,300110,300 003MSE MISSILE384,605384,605 AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 004HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY4,4524,452 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 005JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY77,66877,668 006TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY50,36850,368 007 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)19,98419,984 008GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)127,145127,145 009MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)21,27421,274 MODIFICATIONS 012PATRIOT MODS131,838131,838 013STINGER MODS1,3551,355 014AVENGER MODS5,6115,611 015ITAS/TOW MODS19,67619,676 016MLRS MODS10,38010,380 017HIMARS MODIFICATIONS6,0086,008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 018SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS36,93036,930 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 019AIR DEFENSE TARGETS3,6573,657 020ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)1,5221,522 021PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT4,7104,710 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY1,017,4831,017,483 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 001STRYKER VEHICLE385,110385,110 MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 002STRYKER (MOD)39,68389,683 Unfunded requirement-Fourth DVH Brigade Set[50,000] 003FIST VEHICLE (MOD)26,75926,759 004BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)107,506107,506 005HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)45,41145,411 006PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)247,400247,400 007IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)50,45150,451 008ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)2,4732,473 009ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE36,58336,583 010M88 FOV MODS1,97573,975 Unfunded requirement-Industrial Base Initiative[72,000] 011JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE49,46249,462 012M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)237,023237,023 013ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM120,000 Industrial Base initiative[120,000] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 014PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)6,4786,478 WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 016MORTAR SYSTEMS5,0125,012 017XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)28,39028,390 018COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM148148 019CARBINE29,36620,616 Army requested realignment[–8,750] 021COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION8,4098,409 022HANDGUN3,9571,957 Funding ahead of need[–2,000] MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 024M777 MODS18,16618,166 025M4 CARBINE MODS3,4466,446 Army requested realignment[3,000] 026M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS25,29625,296 027M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS5,5465,546 028M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS4,6352,635 Army requested realignment[–2,000] 029SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS4,0794,079 030M119 MODIFICATIONS72,71872,718 031M16 RIFLE MODS1,9520 Army requested realignment[–1,952] 032MORTAR MODIFICATION8,9038,903 033MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)2,0892,089 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 034ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)2,0052,005 035PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)8,9118,911 036INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS414414 037SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)1,6821,682 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY1,471,4381,701,736 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 001CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES34,94334,943 002CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES12,41812,418 003CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES9,6558,155 Funding ahead of need[–1,500] 004CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES29,30429,304 006CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES8,1818,181 007CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES52,66752,667 008CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES40,90440,904 MORTAR AMMUNITION 00960MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES41,74241,742 01081MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES42,43342,433 011120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES39,36539,365 TANK AMMUNITION 012CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES101,900101,900 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 013ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES37,45537,455 014ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES47,02347,023 015PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M98235,67235,672 016ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL94,01074,010 Precision Guided Kits Schedule Delay[–20,000] ROCKETS 019SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES945945 020ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES27,28627,286 OTHER AMMUNITION 021DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES22,89922,899 022GRENADES, ALL TYPES22,75122,751 023SIGNALS, ALL TYPES7,0827,082 024SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES11,63811,638 MISCELLANEOUS 025AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES3,5943,594 027CAD/PAD ALL TYPES5,4305,430 028ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)8,3378,337 029AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT14,90614,906 030FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)14,34914,349 031CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES111111 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 032PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES148,092146,192 Unjustified request[–1,900] 033CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION113,881113,881 034ARMS INITIATIVE2,5042,504 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY1,031,4771,008,077 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 001TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS7,9877,987 002SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:160160 004JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE164,615164,615 005FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)50,000 Additional FMTVs – Industrial Base initiative[50,000] 006FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP8,4158,415 007FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)28,42578,425 Additional HEMTT ESP Vehicles-Industrial Base initiative[50,000] 008PLS ESP89,26389,263 013TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS38,22638,226 014MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP91,17383,173 Early to need[–8,000] 015MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS14,73114,731 NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 016HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN175175 017PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES1,3381,338 018NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER11,10111,101 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 019WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK763,087638,087 Unobligated balances[–125,000] 020SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM21,15721,157 021JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY7,9157,915 022JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)5,4405,440 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 023DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS118,085118,085 024TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS13,99913,999 025SHF TERM6,4946,494 026NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)1,6351,635 027SMART-T (SPACE)13,55413,554 028GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS18,89918,899 029MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)2,8492,849 030ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC)100,000100,000 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 033JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM175,711125,711 Unobligated balances[–50,000] 034MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)9,6924,692 Unobligated balances[–5,000] 035RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)17,13617,136 037AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA222,09922,099 038TRACTOR DESK3,7243,724 039SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT969969 040SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS294294 041TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM24,35424,354 042UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE17,44517,445 043RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY1,0281,028 044FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE22,61422,614 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 046CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE1,5191,519 047ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT12,47812,478 INFORMATION SECURITY 050INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP2,1132,113 051COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)69,64669,646 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 052BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS28,91328,913 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 053INFORMATION SYSTEMS97,09197,091 054DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)246246 055EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM5,3625,362 056INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM79,96579,965 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 060JTT/CIBS-M870870 061PROPHET GROUND55,89655,896 063DCGS-A (MIP)128,207128,207 064JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)5,2865,286 065TROJAN (MIP)12,61412,614 066MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)3,9013,901 067CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)7,3927,392 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 068LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR24,82824,828 070AIR VIGILANCE (AV)7,0007,000 072COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES1,2851,285 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 075SENTINEL MODS44,30544,305 076NIGHT VISION DEVICES160,901160,901 078SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF18,52018,520 080INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS68,29668,296 081FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS)49,20534,205 Early to need[–15,000] 082ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP4,8964,896 083PROFILER3,1153,115 084MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)4,1864,186 085JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)97,89287,892 Schedule delay[–10,000] 086JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS)27,45027,450 087MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)14,08514,085 088MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM29,04029,040 089COUNTERFIRE RADARS209,050159,050 Excessive LRIP/concurrency costs[–50,000] ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 092FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY13,82313,823 095AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS27,37427,374 097LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)2,5082,508 099NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE21,52421,524 100MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)95,45595,455 101GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)118,600118,600 102INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP32,97032,970 104RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET10,11310,113 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 105ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION9,0159,015 106AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP155,223155,223 107GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM16,58116,581 108HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)65,25265,252 110RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)17,63117,631 ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 112ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)5,4375,437 ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 113PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)426426 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 114ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,7073,707 CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 115FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)937937 116BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)1,9301,930 117CBRN DEFENSE17,46817,468 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 119TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON5,4425,442 120COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP11,01311,013 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 121GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)37,64933,249 Early to need[–4,400] 122HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS)18,54518,545 123ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)4,7014,701 124EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION6,3466,346 125EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)15,85615,856 126REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS4,4854,485 127< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT4,9384,938 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 128HEATERS AND ECU'S9,2359,235 130SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT1,6771,677 131PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)16,72816,728 132GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM84,76184,761 134FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT15,17915,179 135CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM28,19428,194 137FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS41,96741,967 138ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)20,09020,090 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 139QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT1,4351,435 140DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER40,69240,692 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 141COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL46,95746,957 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 142MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS23,75823,758 143ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)2,7892,789 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 144GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)5,8275,827 145SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING14,92614,926 147COMPACTOR4,3484,348 148HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR4,9384,938 149TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED34,07134,071 150ALL TERRAIN CRANES4,9384,938 151PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING667667 153ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP14,92414,924 154CONST EQUIP ESP15,93315,933 155ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)6,7496,749 RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 156ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP10,50910,509 157ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)2,1662,166 GENERATORS 158GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP115,190105,190 Cost savings from new contract[–10,000] MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 160FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS14,32714,327 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 161COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT65,06265,062 162TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM101,295101,295 163CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER13,40613,406 164AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER14,44014,440 165GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING10,16510,165 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 166CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT5,7265,726 167INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)37,48237,482 168TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)16,06116,061 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 170RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,3802,380 171PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)30,68630,686 172BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT1,0081,008 173MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)98,55983,559 Early to need—watercraft C4ISR[–15,000] 174PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)1,6971,697 175SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING25,39425,394 176AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA312,97512,975 OPA2 180INITIAL SPARES—C&E50,03250,032 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY4,893,6344,701,234 JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 004OPERATIONS115,0580 Transfer of JIEDDO to Overseas Contingency Operations[–65,558] Unjustified request[–49,500] TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND115,058<bold>0</bold> AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 001EA–18G43,547493,547 Additional EA–18G aircraft[450,000] 005JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV610,652610,652 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)29,40029,400 007JSF STOVL1,200,4101,200,410 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)143,885143,885 009V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)1,487,0001,487,000 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)45,92045,920 011H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)778,757778,757 012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)80,92680,926 013MH–60S (MYP)210,209210,209 015MH–60R (MYP)933,882880,482 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[–53,400] 016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)106,686106,686 017P–8A POSEIDON2,003,3272,003,327 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)48,45748,457 019E–2D ADV HAWKEYE819,870819,870 020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)225,765225,765 OTHER AIRCRAFT 023KC–130J92,29092,290 026 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)37,44537,445 027MQ–8 UAV40,66340,663 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 029EA–6 SERIES10,99310,993 030AEA SYSTEMS34,76834,768 031AV–8 SERIES65,47265,472 032ADVERSARY8,4188,418 033F–18 SERIES679,177679,177 034H–46 SERIES480480 036H–53 SERIES38,15938,159 037SH–60 SERIES108,850108,850 038H–1 SERIES45,03345,033 039EP–3 SERIES32,89050,890 Obsolescence issues[5,000] SIGINT Architecture Modernization Common Configuration[13,000] 040P–3 SERIES2,8232,823 041E–2 SERIES21,20821,208 042TRAINER A/C SERIES12,60812,608 044C–130 SERIES40,37840,378 045FEWSG640640 046CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES4,6354,635 047E–6 SERIES212,876212,876 048EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES71,32871,328 049SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT21,31721,317 050T–45 SERIES90,05290,052 051POWER PLANT CHANGES19,09419,094 052JPATS SERIES1,0851,085 054COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT155,644155,644 055COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES157,531157,531 056COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM1,9581,958 057ID SYSTEMS38,88038,880 058P–8 SERIES29,79729,797 059MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION14,77014,770 060MQ–8 SERIES8,7418,741 061RQ–7 SERIES2,5422,542 062V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY135,584135,584 063F–35 STOVL SERIES285,968285,968 064F–35 CV SERIES20,50220,502 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 065SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS1,229,6511,226,651 Program decrease[–3,000] AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 066COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT418,355418,355 067AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES23,84323,843 068WAR CONSUMABLES15,93915,939 069OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES5,6305,630 070SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT65,83965,839 071FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION1,7681,768 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY13,074,31713,485,917 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 001TRIDENT II MODS1,190,4551,190,455 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 002MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES5,6715,671 STRATEGIC MISSILES 003TOMAHAWK194,258276,258 Minimum sustaining rate increase[82,000] TACTICAL MISSILES 004AMRAAM32,16522,165 Program decrease[–10,000] 005SIDEWINDER73,92873,928 006JSOW130,759130,759 007STANDARD MISSILE445,836445,836 008RAM80,79280,792 011STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)1,8101,810 012AERIAL TARGETS48,04648,046 013OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT3,2953,295 MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 014ESSM119,434119,434 015HARM MODS111,739111,739 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 016WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES2,5312,531 017FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON208,700199,700 Excess to need[–9,000] ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 018ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT73,21173,211 TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 019SSTD6,5626,562 020MK–48 TORPEDO14,15314,153 021ASW TARGETS2,5152,515 MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 022MK–54 TORPEDO MODS98,92898,928 023MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS46,89346,893 024QUICKSTRIKE MINE6,9666,966 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 025TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT52,67052,670 026ASW RANGE SUPPORT3,7953,795 DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 027FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION3,6923,692 GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 028SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS13,24013,240 MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 029CIWS MODS75,10875,108 030COAST GUARD WEAPONS18,94818,948 031GUN MOUNT MODS62,65162,651 033AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS15,00615,006 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 035SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS74,18874,188 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY3,217,9453,280,945 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 001GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS107,069107,069 002AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES70,39670,396 003MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION20,28420,284 004PRACTICE BOMBS26,70126,701 005CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES53,86653,866 006AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES59,29459,294 007JATOS2,7662,766 008LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE113,092113,092 0095 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION35,70235,702 010INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION36,47536,475 011OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION43,90643,906 012SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO51,53551,535 013PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION11,65211,652 014AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,4734,473 MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 015SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION31,70831,708 016LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES692692 01740 MM, ALL TYPES13,63013,630 01860MM, ALL TYPES2,2612,261 01981MM, ALL TYPES1,4961,496 020120MM, ALL TYPES14,85514,855 022GRENADES, ALL TYPES4,0004,000 023ROCKETS, ALL TYPES16,85316,853 024ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES14,77214,772 026FUZE, ALL TYPES9,9729,972 027NON LETHALS998998 028AMMO MODERNIZATION12,31912,319 029ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,17811,178 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC771,945771,945 SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY OTHER WARSHIPS 001CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM1,300,0001,300,000 002VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE3,553,2543,553,254 003 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)2,330,3252,330,325 004CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS483,600 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[483,600] 006DDG 1000419,532365,532 DDG–1000[–54,000] 007DDG–512,671,4152,671,415 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)134,039134,039 009LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP1,427,049977,049 Reduction of 1 LCS[–450,000] 009A ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)100,000 Program requirement[100,000] AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 010LPD–1712,565812,565 Incremental funding for LPD–28[800,000] 014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)29,09329,093 015JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL4,5904,590 AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 016MOORED TRAINING SHIP737,268517,268 Moored Training Ship[–220,000] 017 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)64,38864,388 018OUTFITTING546,104546,104 019SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR123,233123,233 020LCAC SLEP40,48540,485 021COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS1,007,2851,007,285 TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY14,400,62515,060,225 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 001LM–2500 GAS TURBINE7,8227,822 002ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE2,1552,155 003HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)22,70415,704 Hybrid Electric Drive[–7,000] GENERATORS 004SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E29,12022,120 Surface Combatant HM&E[–7,000] NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 005OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT45,43145,431 PERISCOPES 006SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP60,97052,670 Submarine Periscopes and Imaging Equipment[–8,300] OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 007DDG MOD338,569338,569 008FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT15,48615,486 009COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD2,2192,219 010LHA/LHD MIDLIFE17,92817,928 011LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM22,02522,025 012POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT12,60712,607 013SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT16,49216,492 014VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT74,12974,129 015LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT36,20636,206 016SUBMARINE BATTERIES37,35237,352 017LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT49,09549,095 018ELECTRONIC DRY AIR2,9962,996 019STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP11,55811,558 020DSSP EQUIPMENT5,5185,518 022LCAC7,1587,158 023UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS58,78353,783 Underwater EOD programs[–5,000] 024ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION68,74868,748 025CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS2,9372,937 026SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM8,3858,385 REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 027REACTOR POWER UNITS298,200 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[298,200] 028REACTOR COMPONENTS288,822288,822 OCEAN ENGINEERING 029DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT10,57210,572 SMALL BOATS 030STANDARD BOATS129,78480,784 Standard Boats[–49,000] TRAINING EQUIPMENT 031OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT17,15217,152 PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 032OPERATING FORCES IPE39,40939,409 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 033NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS118,129118,129 034LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT37,41337,413 035LCS MCM MISSION MODULES15,27015,270 036LCS ASW MISSION MODULES2,7292,729 037LCS SUW MISSION MODULES44,20844,208 038REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)42,27642,276 SHIP SONARS 040SPQ–9B RADAR28,00728,007 041AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM79,80279,802 042SSN ACOUSTICS165,655165,655 043UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT9,4879,487 044SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS11,62111,621 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 046SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM24,22124,221 047SSTD12,05112,051 048FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM170,831170,831 049SURTASS9,6199,619 050MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE14,39014,390 ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 051AN/SLQ–32214,582214,582 RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 052SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT124,862124,862 053AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)164164 SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 054SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG45,36245,362 OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 055COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY33,93933,939 056TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)324324 057NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)18,19218,192 058ATDLS16,76816,768 059NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)5,2195,219 060MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT42,10842,108 062NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)15,23215,232 063AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE4,5244,524 064STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP6,3826,382 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 065OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT46,12246,122 AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 066MATCALS16,99916,999 067SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL9,3669,366 068AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM21,35721,357 069NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM26,63926,639 070FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS9,2149,214 071LANDING SYSTEMS13,90213,902 072ID SYSTEMS34,90134,901 073NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS13,95013,950 OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 074DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL1,2051,205 075MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM3,4473,447 076TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS16,76616,766 077DCGS-N23,64923,649 078CANES357,589357,589 079RADIAC8,3438,343 080CANES-INTELL65,01565,015 081GPETE6,2846,284 082INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY4,0164,016 083EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION4,1134,113 084ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION45,05345,053 SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 085SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS14,41014,410 086SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION20,83020,830 088COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M14,14514,145 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 089SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT11,05711,057 090SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT67,85267,852 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 091SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS13,21813,268 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[50] 092NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)272,076272,076 SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 093JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT4,3694,369 094ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS1,4021,402 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 095INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)110,766110,766 096MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM979979 CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 097CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP11,50211,502 OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 098COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT2,9672,967 SONOBUOYS 100SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES182,946182,946 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 101WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT47,94447,944 103AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT76,68376,683 106METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT12,57512,875 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[300] 107DCRS/DPL1,4151,415 109AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES23,15223,152 114AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT52,55552,555 SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 115SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT5,5725,572 SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 118SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT165,769165,769 123TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT61,46261,462 FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 126STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP229,832229,832 ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 127SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS66,02066,020 128ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT7,5597,559 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 132EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP20,61920,619 133ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,25111,251 OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 137TRAINING DEVICE MODS84,08084,080 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 138PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES2,2822,282 139GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS547547 140CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP8,9498,949 141FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT14,62114,621 142TACTICAL VEHICLES957957 143AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT8,1878,187 144POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT2,9422,942 145ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION17,59217,592 146PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES1,1771,177 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 147MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT10,93710,937 148OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT10,37410,374 149FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION5,6685,668 150SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS90,92190,921 TRAINING DEVICES 151TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT22,04622,046 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 152COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT24,20824,208 153EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT874874 154MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,6342,634 156NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,5733,573 157OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,9973,997 158C4ISR EQUIPMENT9,6389,638 159ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT21,00121,001 160PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT94,95794,957 161ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY87,21487,214 OTHER 164NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE116,165116,165 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 164ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS10,84710,847 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 165SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS325,084325,134 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[50] TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY5,975,8286,198,128 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 001AAV7A1 PIP16,75616,756 002LAV PIP77,73677,736 ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 003EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM5,742642 Per Marine Corps excess to need[–5,100] 004155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER4,5324,532 005HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM19,47419,474 006WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION7,2507,250 OTHER SUPPORT 007MODIFICATION KITS21,90921,909 008WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM3,2083,208 GUIDED MISSILES 009GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE31,43931,439 010JAVELIN343343 011FOLLOW ON TO SMAW4,9954,995 012ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)1,5891,589 OTHER SUPPORT 013MODIFICATION KITS5,1345,134 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 014UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER9,1789,178 015COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C12,27212,272 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 016REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT30,59130,591 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 017COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM2,3852,385 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 019ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)4,2054,205 020AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS8,0028,002 RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 021RADAR SYSTEMS19,59519,595 022U89,23089,230 023RQ–21 UAS70,56570,565 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 024FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM11,86011,860 025INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT44,34044,340 028RQ–11 UAV2,7372,737 030DCGS-MC20,62020,620 OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 031NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT9,7989,798 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 032NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN)2,0732,073 033COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES33,57033,570 034COMMAND POST SYSTEMS38,18638,186 035RADIO SYSTEMS64,49464,494 036COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS72,95672,956 037COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT43,31743,317 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 037ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS2,4982,498 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 038COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES332332 039COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES11,03511,035 TACTICAL VEHICLES 0405/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)57,25537,255 Early to need[–20,000] 041MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS938938 044JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE7,5007,500 045FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS10,17910,179 OTHER SUPPORT 046ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,02311,023 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 047ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT994994 048BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT1,2561,256 049TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS3,7503,750 050POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED8,9858,985 051AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT4,4184,418 052EOD SYSTEMS6,5286,528 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 053PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT26,51026,510 054GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)1,9101,910 055MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP8,8078,807 056FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION128128 GENERAL PROPERTY 058TRAINING DEVICES3,4123,412 059CONTAINER FAMILY1,6621,662 060FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT3,6693,669 OTHER SUPPORT 062ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,2724,272 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 063SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS16,21016,210 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS983,352958,252 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 001F–353,553,0463,553,046 002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)291,880291,880 TACTICAL AIRLIFT 003KC–46A TANKER1,582,6851,356,585 LRIP 1 Ramp Rate[–226,100] OTHER AIRLIFT 004C–130J482,396482,396 005 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)140,000140,000 006HC–130J332,024332,024 007 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)50,00050,000 008MC–130J190,971190,971 009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)80,00080,000 MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 012CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C2,5622,562 OTHER AIRCRAFT 013TARGET DRONES98,57698,576 016RQ–454,47544,475 MPRTIP Sensor Trainer reduction[–10,000] 017AC–130J11 018MQ–9240,218360,218 Program increase[120,000] STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 020B–2A23,86523,865 021B–1B140,252140,252 022B–52180,148180,148 023LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES13,15913,159 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 025F–15387,314387,314 026F–1612,33612,336 027F–22A180,207180,207 028F–35 MODIFICATIONS187,646187,646 029 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)28,50028,500 AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 030C–514,73114,731 031C–5M331,466281,466 Program execution delay[–50,000] 033C–17A127,494127,494 034C–21264264 035C–32A8,7678,767 036C–37A18,45718,457 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 038GLIDER MODS132132 039T–614,48614,486 040T–17,6507,650 041T–3834,84534,845 OTHER AIRCRAFT 044KC–10A (ATCA)34,31334,313 045C–121,9601,960 048VC–25A MOD1,0721,072 049C–407,2927,292 050C–13035,869109,671 8.33kHz radios[–7,447] C–130 8–Bladed Propeller upgrade[30,000] C–130 AMP[35,800] CVR/DVR[–7,151] T–56 3.5 Engine Mod[22,600] 051C–130J MODS7,9197,919 052C–13563,56863,568 053COMPASS CALL MODS57,82857,828 054RC–135152,746152,746 055E–316,49129,348 Program increase[12,857] 056E–422,34122,341 058AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM160,284160,284 059FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS32,02632,026 060H–18,2378,237 061H–6060,11060,110 062RQ–4 MODS21,35421,354 063HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS1,9021,902 064OTHER AIRCRAFT32,10632,106 065MQ–1 MODS4,7551,555 Program reduction[–3,200] 066MQ–9 MODS155,445155,445 069CV–22 MODS74,87474,874 069AEJECTION SEAT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM7,000 Initial aircraft installation[7,000] AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 070INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS466,562424,532 Program decrease[–42,030] COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 071AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP22,47022,470 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 074B–2A44,79344,793 075B–525,2495,249 077C–17A20,11015,110 Program execution delay[–5,000] 078CV–22 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT16,93116,931 080C–1354,4144,414 081F–151,1221,122 082F–1610,99410,994 083F–22A5,9295,929 084OTHER AIRCRAFT2727 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 085INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS21,36321,363 WAR CONSUMABLES 086WAR CONSUMABLES82,90682,906 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 087OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES1,007,2761,007,276 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 087ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS69,38069,380 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE11,542,57111,419,900 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 001MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC80,18780,187 TACTICAL 003JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE337,438337,438 004SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)132,995132,995 005AMRAAM329,600329,600 006PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE33,87833,878 007SMALL DIAMETER BOMB70,57870,578 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 008INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION749749 CLASS IV 009MM III MODIFICATIONS28,47728,477 010AGM–65D MAVERICK276276 011AGM–88A HARM297297 012AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)16,08316,083 013SMALL DIAMETER BOMB6,9246,924 MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 014INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS87,36687,366 SPACE PROGRAMS 015ADVANCED EHF298,890298,890 016WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)38,97135,971 Unjustified growth[–3,000] 017GPS III SPACE SEGMENT235,397235,397 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)57,00057,000 019SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)16,20116,201 020GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)52,09052,090 021DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)87,00087,000 022EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (INFRAST.)750,143750,143 023EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)630,903765,903 DMSP 20 launch/Additional competition launch[135,000] 024SBIR HIGH (SPACE)450,884450,884 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 028SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS60,17960,179 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 028ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS888,000888,000 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE4,690,5064,822,506 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 001ROCKETS4,6964,696 CARTRIDGES 002CARTRIDGES133,271133,271 BOMBS 003PRACTICE BOMBS31,99831,998 004GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS148,614148,614 005JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION101,400101,400 OTHER ITEMS 006CAD/PAD29,98929,989 007EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)6,9256,925 008SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS494494 009MODIFICATIONS1,6101,610 010ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,2374,237 FLARES 011FLARES86,10186,101 FUZES 012FUZES103,417103,417 SMALL ARMS 013SMALL ARMS24,64824,648 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE677,400677,400 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 001PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES6,5282,528 Program reduction[–4,000] CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 002MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE7,6392,639 Program reduction[–5,000] 003CAP VEHICLES961961 004ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,0275,027 Program reduction[–6,000] SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 005SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES4,4474,447 006ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION693693 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 007FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES10,15210,152 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 008ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION15,1085,108 Program reduction[–10,000] BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 009RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP10,2126,212 Program reduction[–4,000] 010ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION57,04932,049 Program reduction[–25,000] COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 011COMSEC EQUIPMENT106,182106,182 012MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)1,3631,363 INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 013INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT2,8322,832 014INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT32,32932,329 016MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS15,64915,649 ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 017AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS42,20042,200 018NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM6,3336,333 019BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED2,7082,708 020THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS50,03340,033 Program reduction[–10,000] 021WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST16,34816,348 022STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL139,984139,984 023CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX20,10120,101 026INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN)9,0609,060 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 027GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY39,10039,100 028AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS19,01019,010 029MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL11,46211,462 030AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM37,42637,426 031COMBAT TRAINING RANGES26,63426,634 032MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N1,2891,289 033C3 COUNTERMEASURES11,50811,508 034GCSS-AF FOS3,6703,670 035DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT SYSTEM15,29815,298 036THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM9,5659,565 037AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS25,77225,772 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 038INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS81,286112,586 Air Force requested program transfer from AFNET[31,300] 039AFNET122,22890,928 Air Force requested program transfer to BITI[–31,300] 041USCENTCOM16,34216,342 SPACE PROGRAMS 042FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS60,23060,230 043SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE26,10026,100 044NAVSTAR GPS SPACE2,0752,075 045NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE4,6564,656 046AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE54,63054,630 047SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE69,71369,713 048MILSATCOM SPACE41,35541,355 049SPACE MODS SPACE31,72231,722 050COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM61,60361,603 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 051TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT50,33550,335 053RADIO EQUIPMENT14,84614,846 054CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT3,6353,635 055BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE79,60779,607 MODIFICATIONS 056COMM ELECT MODS105,398105,398 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 057NIGHT VISION GOGGLES12,57712,577 058ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION31,20931,209 DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 059MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP7,6707,670 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 060BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT14,12514,125 061CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS16,74416,744 062PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT2,4952,495 063MOBILITY EQUIPMENT10,57310,573 064ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION5,4625,462 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 066DARP RC13524,71024,710 067DCGS-AF206,743206,743 069SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM537,370537,370 070DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.77,89877,898 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 070ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS13,990,19613,990,196 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 072SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS32,81332,813 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE16,566,01816,502,018 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 001ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION1,5941,594 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 002MAJOR EQUIPMENT4,3254,325 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 003PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION17,26817,268 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 008INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY10,49110,491 010TELEPORT PROGRAM80,62280,622 011ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION14,14714,147 012NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)1,9211,921 013DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK80,14480,144 015CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE8,7558,755 016WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY33,73733,737 017SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE32,54432,544 018JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT13,30013,300 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 020MAJOR EQUIPMENT7,4367,436 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 021MAJOR EQUIPMENT11,64011,640 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 022AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS1,2691,269 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 024VEHICLES1,5001,500 025MAJOR EQUIPMENT1,0391,039 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 026VEHICLES5050 027OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT7,6397,639 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 028 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)68,88068,880 029THAAD464,424464,424 030AEGIS BMD435,430435,430 031BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS48,14048,140 032AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III225,774225,774 034IRON DOME175,972351,972 Program increase for Iron Dome[176,000] MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 041INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)3,4483,448 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 042MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD43,70843,708 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 044MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS10,78310,783 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 046MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS29,59929,599 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 046ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS540,894540,894 AVIATION PROGRAMS 047MC–1240,50040,500 048ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT112,226112,226 049MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM3,0213,021 050NON-STANDARD AVIATION48,20048,200 052MH–47 CHINOOK22,23022,230 053RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE6,3976,397 054CV–22 MODIFICATION25,57825,578 056MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE15,65115,651 057STUASL01,5001,500 058PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE145,929145,929 059AC/MC–130J65,13065,130 061C–130 MODIFICATIONS39,56339,563 SHIPBUILDING 063UNDERWATER SYSTEMS25,45925,459 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 065ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M144,336144,336 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 068INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS81,00181,001 070DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS17,32313,423 Reduction of PED Ground Systems[–3,900] 071OTHER ITEMS <$5M84,85284,852 072COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS51,93751,937 074SPECIAL PROGRAMS31,01731,017 075TACTICAL VEHICLES63,13463,134 076WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M192,448192,448 078COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS19,98419,984 081GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES5,0445,044 082OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE38,12638,126 088OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS243,849243,849 CBDP 095CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS170,137170,137 096CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION150,392150,392 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE4,221,4374,393,537 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 001JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND20,0000 Unjustified request[–20,000] TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND20,0000 PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS 001PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS–265,6850 Denied Prior Year Rescission request[265,685] TOTAL PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS–265,685<bold>0</bold> UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS 001UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS–265,685 Undistributed FY15 reduction[–265,685] TOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED GENERAL PROVISIONS–265,685 TOTAL PROCUREMENT89,508,03490,983,703 XLII Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation 4201. research, development, test, and evaluation SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) LineProgramElementItemFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 0010601101AIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH13,46413,464 0020601102ADEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES238,167238,167 0030601103AUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES69,80869,808 0040601104AUNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS102,737102,737 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH424,176424,176 APPLIED RESEARCH 0050602105AMATERIALS TECHNOLOGY28,00628,006 0060602120ASENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY33,51533,515 0070602122ATRACTOR HIP16,35816,358 0080602211AAVIATION TECHNOLOGY63,43363,433 0090602270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY18,50218,502 0100602303AMISSILE TECHNOLOGY46,19446,194 0110602307AADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY28,52828,528 0120602308AADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION27,43527,435 0130602601ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY72,88372,883 0140602618ABALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY85,59785,597 0150602622ACHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY3,9713,971 0160602623AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM6,8536,853 0170602624AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY38,06938,069 0180602705AELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES56,43556,435 0190602709ANIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY38,44538,445 0200602712ACOUNTERMINE SYSTEMS25,93925,939 0210602716AHUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY23,78323,783 0220602720AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY15,65915,659 0230602782ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY33,81733,817 0240602783ACOMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY10,76410,764 0250602784AMILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY63,31163,311 0260602785AMANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY23,29523,295 0270602786AWARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY25,75128,330 Joint Service Combat Feeding Technology[2,579] 0280602787AMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY76,06876,068 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH862,611865,190 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0290603001AWARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY65,13965,813 Joint Service Combat Feeding Tech Demo[674] 0300603002AMEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY67,29167,291 0310603003AAVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY88,99088,990 0320603004AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY57,93157,931 0330603005ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY110,031110,031 0340603006ASPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY6,8836,883 0350603007AMANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY13,58013,580 0360603008AELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,87144,871 0370603009ATRACTOR HIKE7,4927,492 0380603015ANEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS16,74916,749 0390603020ATRACTOR ROSE14,48314,483 0410603125ACOMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT24,27024,270 0420603130ATRACTOR NAIL3,4403,440 0430603131ATRACTOR EGGS2,4062,406 0440603270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY26,05726,057 0450603313AMISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,95744,957 0460603322ATRACTOR CAGE11,10511,105 0470603461AHIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM181,609181,609 0480603606ALANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY13,07413,074 0490603607AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM7,3217,321 0500603710ANIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,13844,138 0510603728AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS9,1979,197 0520603734AMILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY17,61317,613 0530603772AADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY39,16439,164 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT917,791918,465 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0540603305AARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION12,79712,797 0550603308AARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION13,99913,999 0580603639ATANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION29,33429,334 0600603747ASOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY9,60211,189 Food Advanced Development[1,587] 0610603766ATACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV8,9538,953 0620603774ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT3,0523,052 0630603779AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL7,8307,830 0650603790ANATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT2,9542,954 0670603804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV13,38613,386 0690603807AMEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV23,65923,659 0700603827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT6,8309,830 Army requested realignment—Caliber Config Study[3,000] 0720604100AANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES9,9139,913 0730604115ATECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES74,74074,740 0740604120AASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT)9,9309,930 0760604319AINDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)96,17771,177 Schedule delay[–25,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES323,156302,743 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0790604201AAIRCRAFT AVIONICS37,24637,246 0810604270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT6,0026,002 0820604280AJOINT TACTICAL RADIO9,8329,832 0830604290AMID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)9,7309,730 0840604321AALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM5,5325,532 0850604328ATRACTOR CAGE19,92919,929 0860604601AINFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS27,88434,586 Army requested realignment[6,702] 0870604604AMEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES210210 0880604611AJAVELIN4,1664,166 0890604622AFAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES12,91312,913 0900604633AAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL16,76416,764 0910604641ATACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV)6,7706,770 0920604710ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV65,33365,333 0930604713ACOMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT1,3351,897 Military Subsistence Systems[562] 0940604715ANON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV8,9458,945 0960604741AAIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV15,90615,906 0970604742ACONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT4,3944,394 0980604746AAUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT11,08411,084 0990604760ADISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV10,02710,027 1000604780ACOMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE42,43042,430 1010604798ABRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION105,279105,279 1020604802AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV15,00615,006 1030604804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV24,58124,581 1040604805ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV4,4334,433 1050604807AMEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV30,39730,397 1060604808ALANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV57,70557,705 1080604818AARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE29,68329,683 1090604820ARADAR DEVELOPMENT5,2245,224 1110604823AFIREFINDER37,49237,492 1120604827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL6,1576,157 1130604854AARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD1,9121,912 1160605013AINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT69,76169,761 1170605018AINTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)138,465138,465 1180605028AARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)92,35392,353 1190605030AJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)8,4408,440 1200605031AJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN)17,99917,999 1210605035ACOMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM)145,409145,409 1220605350AWIN-T INCREMENT 3—FULL NETWORKING113,210113,210 1230605380AAMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)6,8826,882 1240605450AJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)83,83883,838 1250605456APAC–3/MSE MISSILE35,00935,009 1260605457AARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)142,584142,584 1270605625AMANNED GROUND VEHICLE49,16049,160 1280605626AAERIAL COMMON SENSOR17,74817,748 1290605766ANATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)15,21215,212 1300605812AJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH45,71845,718 1310605830AAVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT10,04110,041 1320210609APALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)83,30083,300 1330303032ATROJAN—RH12983983 1340304270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT8,9618,961 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION1,719,3741,726,638 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1350604256ATHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT18,06218,062 1360604258ATARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT10,04010,040 1370604759AMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT60,31760,317 1380605103ARAND ARROYO CENTER20,61220,612 1390605301AARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL176,041176,041 1400605326ACONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM19,43919,439 1420605601AARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES275,025275,025 1430605602AARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS45,59645,596 1440605604ASURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS33,29533,295 1450605606AAIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION4,7004,700 1460605702AMETEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES6,4136,413 1470605706AMATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS20,74620,746 1480605709AEXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS7,0157,015 1490605712ASUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING49,22149,221 1500605716AARMY EVALUATION CENTER55,03955,039 1510605718AARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG1,1251,125 1520605801APROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES64,16964,169 1530605803ATECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES32,31932,319 1540605805AMUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY49,05249,052 1550605857AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT2,6122,612 1560605898AMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D49,59249,592 SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,000,4301,000,430 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1580603778AMLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM17,11217,112 1590607141ALOGISTICS AUTOMATION3,6543,654 1600607664ABIOMETRIC ENABLING CAPABILITY (BEC)1,3321,332 1610607865APATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT152,991152,991 1620102419AAEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE54,07629,076 Unobligated balances[–25,000] 1630203726AADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM22,37422,374 1640203728AJOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS)24,37124,371 1650203735ACOMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS295,177321,177 Stryker ECP risk mitigation[26,000] 1660203740AMANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM45,09245,092 1670203744AAIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS264,887264,887 1680203752AAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM381381 1690203758ADIGITIZATION10,91210,912 1700203801AMISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM5,1155,115 1710203802AOTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS49,84844,848 Contract delay for ATACMS[–5,000] 1720203808ATRACTOR CARD22,69122,691 1730205402AINTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV4,3644,364 1740205410AMATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT834834 1750205412AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV280280 1760205456ALOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM78,75878,758 1770205778AGUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS)45,37745,377 1780208053AJOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM10,20910,209 1810303028ASECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES12,52512,525 1820303140AINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM14,17514,175 1830303141AGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM4,5274,527 1840303142ASATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)11,01111,011 1850303150AWWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM2,1512,151 1870305204ATACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES22,87022,870 1880305208ADISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS20,15520,155 1890305219AMQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS46,47246,472 1910305233ARQ–7 UAV16,38916,389 1920307665ABIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE1,9741,974 1930310349AWIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING3,2493,249 1940708045AEND ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES76,22576,225 194A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS4,8024,802 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT1,346,3601,342,360 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY6,593,8986,580,002 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 0010601103NUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES113,908118,908 DURIP program increase[5,000] 0020601152NIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH18,73418,734 0030601153NDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES443,697443,697 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH576,339581,339 APPLIED RESEARCH 0040602114NPOWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH95,75395,753 0050602123NFORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH139,496139,496 0060602131MMARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY45,83145,831 0070602235NCOMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH43,54143,541 0080602236NWARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH46,92346,923 0090602271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH107,872107,872 0100602435NOCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH45,38865,388 Service Life extension for the AGOR ships[20,000] 0110602651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH5,8875,887 0120602747NUNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH86,88086,880 0130602750NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH170,786170,786 0140602782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH32,52632,526 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH820,883840,883 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0150603114NPOWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY37,73437,734 0160603123NFORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY25,83125,831 0170603271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY64,62364,623 0180603640MUSMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)128,397128,397 0190603651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT11,50611,506 0200603673NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT256,144256,144 0210603729NWARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY4,8384,838 0220603747NUNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY9,9859,985 0230603758NNAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS53,95653,956 0240603782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY2,0002,000 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT595,014595,014 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0250603207NAIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS40,42940,429 0260603216NAVIATION SURVIVABILITY4,3254,325 0270603237NDEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL2,9912,991 0280603251NAIRCRAFT SYSTEMS12,65112,651 0290603254NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT7,7827,782 0300603261NTACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE5,2755,275 0310603382NADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY1,6461,646 0320603502NSURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES100,349100,349 0330603506NSURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE52,78152,781 0340603512NCARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT5,9595,959 0350603525NPILOT FISH148,865148,865 0360603527NRETRACT LARCH25,36525,365 0370603536NRETRACT JUNIPER80,47780,477 0380603542NRADIOLOGICAL CONTROL669669 0390603553NSURFACE ASW1,0601,060 0400603561NADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT70,55170,551 0410603562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS8,0448,044 0420603563NSHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN17,86417,864 0430603564NSHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES23,71623,716 0440603570NADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS499,961499,961 0450603573NADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS21,02621,026 0460603576NCHALK EAGLE542,700542,700 0470603581NLITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)88,73488,734 0480603582NCOMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION20,88120,881 0490603595NOHIO REPLACEMENT849,277849,277 0500603596NLCS MISSION MODULES196,948196,948 0510603597NAUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT)8,1158,115 0520603609NCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS7,6037,603 0530603611MMARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES105,749190,849 Acceleration of the ACV Increment 1.1 Program[85,100] 0540603635MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM1,3421,342 0550603654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT21,39921,399 0560603658NCOOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT43,57843,578 0570603713NOCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT7,7647,764 0580603721NENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION13,20013,200 0590603724NNAVY ENERGY PROGRAM69,41569,415 0600603725NFACILITIES IMPROVEMENT2,5882,588 0610603734NCHALK CORAL176,301176,301 0620603739NNAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY3,8733,873 0630603746NRETRACT MAPLE376,028376,028 0640603748NLINK PLUMERIA272,096272,096 0650603751NRETRACT ELM42,23342,233 0660603764NLINK EVERGREEN46,50446,504 0670603787NSPECIAL PROCESSES25,10925,109 0680603790NNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT9,6599,659 0690603795NLAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY318318 0700603851MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING40,91240,912 0710603860NJOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL54,89627,896 Program delay[–27,000] 0730603925NDIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS58,69658,696 0740604112NGERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80)43,61343,613 0750604122NREMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)21,11021,110 0760604272NTACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)5,6575,657 0770604279NASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION8,0338,033 0780604454NLX (R)36,85936,859 0790604653NJOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)15,22715,227 0810604707NSPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT22,39322,393 0820604786NOFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT202,939202,939 0830605812MJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH11,45011,450 0840303354NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP6,4956,495 0850304270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP332332 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES4,591,8124,649,912 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0860603208NTRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT25,15325,153 0870604212NOTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT46,15446,154 0880604214NAV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV25,37225,372 0890604215NSTANDARDS DEVELOPMENT53,71253,712 0900604216NMULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT11,43411,434 0910604218NAIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING2,1642,164 0920604221NP–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,7101,710 0930604230NWARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM9,0949,094 0940604231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM70,24870,248 0950604234NADVANCED HAWKEYE193,200193,200 0960604245NH–1 UPGRADES44,11544,115 0970604261NACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS23,22723,227 0980604262NV–22A61,24961,249 0990604264NAIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT15,01415,014 1000604269NEA–1818,73018,730 1010604270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT28,74228,742 1020604273NEXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT388,086388,086 1030604274NNEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)246,856246,856 1040604280NJOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)7,1067,106 1050604307NSURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING189,112189,112 1060604311NLPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION376376 1070604329NSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)71,84971,849 1080604366NSTANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS53,19853,198 1090604373NAIRBORNE MCM38,94138,941 1100604376MMARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION7,8327,832 1110604378NNAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING15,26315,263 1120604404NUNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM403,017200,017 Program delay[–203,000] 1130604501NADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS20,40920,409 1140604503NSSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION71,56571,565 1150604504NAIR CONTROL29,03729,037 1160604512NSHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS122,083122,083 1180604522NADVANCED MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM144,706144,706 1190604558NNEW DESIGN SSN72,69572,695 1200604562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM38,98538,985 1210604567NSHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E48,47048,470 1220604574NNAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES3,9353,935 1230604580NVIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM)132,602132,602 1240604601NMINE DEVELOPMENT19,06719,067 1250604610NLIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT25,28025,280 1260604654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT8,9858,985 1270604703NPERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS7,6697,669 1280604727NJOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS4,4004,400 1290604755NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)56,88956,889 1300604756NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)96,93796,937 1310604757NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)134,564134,564 1320604761NINTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING200200 1330604771NMEDICAL DEVELOPMENT8,2878,287 1340604777NNAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM29,50429,504 1350604800MJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD513,021513,021 1360604800NJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD516,456516,456 1370605013MINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,8872,887 1380605013NINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT66,31766,317 1390605212NCH–53K RDTE573,187573,187 1400605220NSHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC)67,81567,815 1410605450NJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)6,3006,300 1420605500NMULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)308,037323,037 Wideband Communication Development[15,000] 1430204202NDDG–1000202,522202,522 1440304231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP1,0111,011 1450304785NTACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS10,35710,357 1460305124NSPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM23,97523,975 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION5,419,1085,231,108 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1470604256NTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT45,27245,272 1480604258NTARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT79,71879,718 1490604759NMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT123,993123,993 1500605126NJOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION4,9604,960 1510605152NSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY8,2968,296 1520605154NCENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES45,75245,752 1540605804NTECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES876876 1550605853NMANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT72,07072,070 1560605856NSTRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT3,2373,237 1570605861NRDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT73,03373,033 1580605863NRDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT138,304138,304 1590605864NTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT336,286336,286 1600605865NOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY16,65816,658 1610605866NNAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT2,5052,505 1620605867NSEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT8,3258,325 1630605873MMARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT17,86617,866 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT977,151977,151 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1680604402NUNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT35,94935,949 1690604766MMARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS215215 1700605525NCARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON8,8738,873 1720101221NSTRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT96,94396,943 1730101224NSSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM30,05730,057 1740101226NSUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT4,5094,509 1750101402NNAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS13,67613,676 1760203761NRAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)12,48012,480 1770204136NF/A–18 SQUADRONS76,21676,216 1790204163NFLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)27,28127,281 1800204228NSURFACE SUPPORT2,8782,878 1810204229NTOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)32,38532,385 1820204311NINTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM39,37139,371 1830204413NAMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)4,6094,609 1840204460MGROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)99,10689,106 Unjustified cost growth[–10,000] 1850204571NCONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT39,92239,922 1860204574NCRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT1,1571,157 1870204575NELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT22,06722,067 1880205601NHARM IMPROVEMENT17,42017,420 1890205604NTACTICAL DATA LINKS151,208151,208 1900205620NSURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION26,36626,366 1910205632NMK–48 ADCAP25,95225,952 1920205633NAVIATION IMPROVEMENTS106,936106,936 1940205675NOPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS104,023104,023 1950206313MMARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS77,39877,398 1960206335MCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S)32,49532,495 1970206623MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS156,626156,626 1980206624MMARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT20,99920,999 1990206625MUSMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)14,17914,179 2000207161NTACTICAL AIM MISSILES47,25847,258 2010207163NADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)10,21010,210 2060303109NSATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)41,82941,829 2070303138NCONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)22,78022,780 2080303140NINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM23,05323,053 2090303150MWWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM296296 2120305160NNAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)359359 2130305192NMILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES6,1666,166 2140305204NTACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES8,5058,505 2160305208MDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS11,61311,613 2170305208NDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS18,14618,146 2180305220NRQ–4 UAV498,003530,403 Triton Sensor Development Acceleration[32,400] 2190305231NMQ–8 UAV47,29447,294 2200305232MRQ–11 UAV718718 2210305233NRQ–7 UAV851851 2220305234NSMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)4,8134,813 2230305239MRQ–21A8,1928,192 2240305241NMULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT22,55922,559 2250305242MUNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP)2,0002,000 2260308601NMODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT4,7194,719 2270702207NDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)21,16821,168 2280708011NINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS37,16937,169 2290708730NMARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)4,3474,347 229A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,162,6841,162,684 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT3,286,0283,308,428 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY16,266,33516,183,835 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 0010601102FDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES314,482314,482 0020601103FUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES127,079127,079 0030601108FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES12,92912,929 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH454,490454,490 APPLIED RESEARCH 0040602102FMATERIALS105,680105,680 0050602201FAEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES105,747105,747 0060602202FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH81,95781,957 0070602203FAEROSPACE PROPULSION172,550369,550 RD–180 replacement[220,000] Reduction for liquid engine combustion technologies and advanced liquid engine technologies[–23,000] 0080602204FAEROSPACE SENSORS118,343118,343 0090602601FSPACE TECHNOLOGY98,22998,229 0100602602FCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS87,38787,387 0110602605FDIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY125,955125,955 0120602788FDOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS147,789147,789 0130602890FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH37,49637,496 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH1,081,1331,278,133 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0140603112FADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS32,17742,177 Metals Affordability Initiative[10,000] 0150603199FSUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)15,80015,800 0160603203FADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS34,42034,420 0170603211FAEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO91,06291,062 0180603216FAEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY124,236124,236 0190603270FELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY47,60247,602 0200603401FADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY69,02669,026 0210603444FMAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)14,03114,031 0220603456FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT21,78821,788 0230603601FCONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY42,04642,046 0240603605FADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY23,54233,542 Program increase[10,000] 0250603680FMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM42,77242,772 0260603788FBATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION35,31535,315 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT593,817613,817 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0270603260FINTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT5,4085,408 0310603438FSPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY6,0756,075 0320603742FCOMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY10,98010,980 0330603790FNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT2,3922,392 0340603791FINTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D833833 0350603830FSPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM32,31332,313 0370603851FINTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL30,88530,885 0390603859FPOLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL1,7981,798 0400604015FLONG RANGE STRIKE913,728913,728 0420604317FTECHNOLOGY TRANSFER2,6692,669 0450604422FWEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON39,9015,001 Realigned to DMSP–20 launch[–34,900] 0490604800FF–35—EMD4,9764,976 0500604857FOPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE30,000 ORS Office and ORS–5 Competition Launch[30,000] 0510604858FTECH TRANSITION PROGRAM59,00459,004 0540207110FNEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE15,72215,722 0550207455FTHREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)88,82588,825 0560305164FNAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)156,659156,659 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES1,372,1681,367,268 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0590604233FSPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING13,32413,324 0600604270FELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT1,9651,965 0610604281FTACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE39,11039,110 0620604287FPHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT3,9263,926 0630604329FSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD68,75968,759 0640604421FCOUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS23,74623,746 0650604425FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS9,46219,462 Program increase[10,000] 0660604426FSPACE FENCE214,131214,131 0670604429FAIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK30,68730,687 0680604441FSPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD319,501319,501 0690604602FARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT31,11231,112 0700604604FSUBMUNITIONS2,5432,543 0710604617FAGILE COMBAT SUPPORT46,34046,340 0720604706FLIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS8,8548,854 0730604735FCOMBAT TRAINING RANGES10,12910,129 0750604800FF–35—EMD563,037563,037 0780604932FLONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON4,9384,938 0790604933FICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION59,82659,826 0800605030FJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)7878 0810605213FF–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B173,647173,647 0820605214FGROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT5,3325,332 0830605221FKC–46776,937776,937 0840605223FADVANCED PILOT TRAINING8,2018,201 0860605278FHC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E7,4977,497 0870605431FADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)314,378314,378 0880605432FPOLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)103,552103,552 0890605433FWIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)31,42531,425 0900605458FAIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E85,93885,938 0910605931FB–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM98,76898,768 0920101125FNUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION198,357198,357 0940207701FFULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING8,8318,831 0950307581FNEXTGEN JSTARS73,08873,088 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION3,337,4193,347,419 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0970604256FTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT24,41824,418 0980604759FMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT47,23247,232 0990605101FRAND PROJECT AIR FORCE30,44330,443 1010605712FINITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION12,26612,266 1020605807FTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT689,509689,509 1030605860FROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)34,36434,364 1040605864FSPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)21,16121,161 1050605976FFACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT46,95546,955 1060605978FFACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT32,96532,965 1070606017FREQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION13,85013,850 1080606116FSPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT19,51219,512 1100606392FSPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE181,727181,727 1110308602FENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS)4,9384,938 1120702806FACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT18,64418,644 1130804731FGENERAL SKILL TRAINING1,4251,425 1141001004FINTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES3,7903,790 114AXXXXXXXFEJECTION SEAT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM3,500 Initial Aircraft Qualification[3,500] SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,183,1991,186,699 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1150603423FGLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT299,760299,760 1160604445FWIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE2,000 Implementation of the Secretary’s Cruise Missile Defense Program[2,000] 1180604618FJOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION2,4692,469 1190605018FAF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)90,21890,218 1200605024FANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY34,81534,815 1220101113FB–52 SQUADRONS55,45755,457 1230101122FAIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)450450 1240101126FB–1B SQUADRONS5,3535,353 1250101127FB–2 SQUADRONS131,580102,180 Flexible Strike execution delay[–29,400] 1260101213FMINUTEMAN SQUADRONS139,109139,109 1270101313FSTRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM35,60335,603 1280101314FNIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM3232 1300102326FREGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,5221,522 1310105921FSERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES3,1343,134 1330205219FMQ–9 UAV170,396170,396 1360207133FF–16 SQUADRONS133,105133,105 1370207134FF–15E SQUADRONS261,969261,969 1380207136FMANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION14,83114,831 1390207138FF–22A SQUADRONS156,962156,962 1400207142FF–35 SQUADRONS43,66643,666 1410207161FTACTICAL AIM MISSILES29,73929,739 1420207163FADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)82,19582,195 1440207171FF–15 EPAWSS68,94453,444 EPAWSS contract delays[–15,500] 1450207224FCOMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY5,0955,095 1460207227FCOMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE883883 1470207247FAF TENCAP5,81215,812 Program increase[10,000] 1480207249FPRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT1,0811,081 1490207253FCOMPASS CALL14,41114,411 1500207268FAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM109,664109,664 1510207325FJOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)15,89715,897 1520207410FAIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)41,06641,066 1530207412FCONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)552552 1540207417FAIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS)180,804180,804 1550207418FTACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS3,7543,754 1570207431FCOMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES7,8917,891 1580207444FTACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD5,8915,891 1590207448FC2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK1,7821,782 1610207452FDCAPES821821 1630207590FSEEK EAGLE23,84423,844 1640207601FUSAF MODELING AND SIMULATION16,72316,723 1650207605FWARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS5,9565,956 1660207697FDISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES4,4574,457 1670208006FMISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS60,67960,679 1690208059FCYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES67,05767,057 1700208087FAF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS13,35513,355 1710208088FAF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS5,5765,576 1790301400FSPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE12,21812,218 1800302015FE–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)28,77828,778 1810303131FMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)81,03581,035 1820303140FINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM70,49770,497 1830303141FGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM692692 1850303601FMILSATCOM TERMINALS55,20855,208 1870304260FAIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE106,786106,786 1900305099FGLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)4,1574,157 1930305110FSATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)20,80620,806 1940305111FWEATHER SERVICE25,10225,102 1950305114FAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)23,51623,516 1960305116FAERIAL TARGETS8,6398,639 1990305128FSECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES498498 2000305145FARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION13,22213,222 2010305146FDEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES360360 2060305173FSPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER3,6743,674 2070305174FSPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,4802,480 2080305179FINTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)8,5928,592 2090305182FSPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)13,46213,462 2100305202FDRAGON U–25,5115,511 2120305206FAIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS28,11338,113 Per Air Force UFR[10,000] 2130305207FMANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS13,51613,516 2140305208FDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS27,26527,265 2150305219FMQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV1,3781,378 2160305220FRQ–4 UAV244,514244,514 2170305221FNETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING11,09611,096 2180305236FCOMMON DATA LINK (CDL)36,13736,137 2190305238FNATO AGS232,851232,851 2200305240FSUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE20,21820,218 2210305265FGPS III SPACE SEGMENT212,571212,571 2220305614FJSPOC MISSION SYSTEM73,77973,779 2230305881FRAPID CYBER ACQUISITION4,1024,102 2250305913FNUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)20,46820,468 2260305940FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS11,59611,596 2270306250FCYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT4,9384,938 2280308699FSHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)1,2121,212 2300401119FC–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)38,77338,773 2310401130FC–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)83,77383,773 2320401132FC–130J PROGRAM26,71526,715 2330401134FLARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)5,1725,172 2340401219FKC–10S2,7142,714 2350401314FOPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT27,78427,784 2360401318FCV–2238,71938,719 2370401319FPRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR)11,00611,006 2380408011FSPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL8,4058,405 2390702207FDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)1,4071,407 2410708610FLOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)109,685109,685 2420708611FSUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT16,20916,209 2430804743FOTHER FLIGHT TRAINING987987 2440808716FOTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES126126 2450901202FJOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY2,6032,603 2460901218FCIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM1,5891,589 2470901220FPERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION5,0265,026 2480901226FAIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY1,3941,394 2490901279FFACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE3,7983,798 2500901538FFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT107,314107,314 250A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS11,441,12011,363,920 Classified program increase[25,000] Classified program reduction[–102,200] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT15,717,66615,617,566 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF23,739,89223,865,392 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 0010601000BRDTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE37,77837,778 0020601101EDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES312,146312,146 0030601110D8ZBASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES44,56434,564 National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship program[–10,000] 0040601117EBASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE49,84849,848 0050601120D8ZNATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM45,48855,488 Pre-Kindergarten to 12th Grade STEM Programs[10,000] 0060601228D8ZHISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS24,41234,412 Historically Black Colleges and Universities[10,000] 0070601384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM48,26148,261 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH562,497572,497 APPLIED RESEARCH 0080602000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY20,06520,065 0090602115EBIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY112,242112,242 0110602234D8ZLINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM51,87551,875 0120602251D8ZAPPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES41,96541,965 0130602303EINFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY334,407334,407 0150602383EBIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE44,82544,825 0160602384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM226,317226,317 0180602668D8ZCYBER SECURITY RESEARCH15,00015,000 0200602702ETACTICAL TECHNOLOGY305,484305,484 0210602715EMATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY160,389160,389 0220602716EELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY179,203179,203 0230602718BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES151,737151,737 0240602751D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH9,1569,156 0251160401BBSOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT39,75039,750 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH1,692,4151,692,415 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0260603000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY26,68826,688 0270603121D8ZSO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT8,6828,682 0280603122D8ZCOMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT69,67589,675 Program emphasis for CT and Irregular Warfare Programs[20,000] 0290603133D8ZFOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING30,00024,000 Program decrease[–6,000] 0300603160BRCOUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT283,694283,694 0320603176CADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT8,4708,470 0330603177CDISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY45,11045,110 0340603178CWEAPONS TECHNOLOGY14,06827,416 MDA DE Ballistic Missile Kill Capability Development[13,348] 0350603179CADVANCED C4ISR15,32915,329 0360603180CADVANCED RESEARCH16,58416,584 0370603225D8ZJOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT19,33519,335 0380603264SAGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY2,5442,544 0390603274CSPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY51,03351,033 0400603286EADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS129,723129,723 0410603287ESPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY179,883179,883 0420603288D8ZANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS12,00012,000 0430603289D8ZADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS60,00050,000 Program decrease[–10,000] 0440603294CCOMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY25,63925,639 0450603384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT132,674132,674 0460603618D8ZJOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY10,96510,965 0470603648D8ZJOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS131,960121,960 Program decrease[–10,000] 0520603680D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM91,09591,095 0530603699D8ZEMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT33,70633,706 0540603712SGENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS16,83616,836 0550603713SDEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY29,68329,683 0560603716D8ZSTRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM57,79657,796 0570603720SMICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT72,14472,144 0580603727D8ZJOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM7,4057,405 0590603739EADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES92,24692,246 0600603760ECOMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS243,265243,265 0620603766ENETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY386,926386,926 0630603767ESENSOR TECHNOLOGY312,821312,821 0640603769SEDISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT10,69210,692 0650603781D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE15,77615,776 0660603826D8ZQUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS69,31964,319 Program decrease[–5,000] 0680603832D8ZDOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE3,0003,000 0710603941D8ZTEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY81,14881,148 0720604055D8ZOPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT31,80031,800 0730303310D8ZCWMD SYSTEMS46,06646,066 0741160402BBSOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT57,62257,622 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,933,4022,935,750 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 0770603161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P41,07241,072 0790603600D8ZWALKOFF90,55890,558 0800603714D8ZADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM15,51815,518 0810603851D8ZENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM51,46251,462 0820603881CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT299,598299,598 0830603882CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT1,003,7681,043,768 BMD program increase[40,000] 0840603884BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL179,236179,236 0850603884CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS392,893392,893 0860603890CBMD ENABLING PROGRAMS410,863410,863 0870603891CSPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA310,261310,261 0880603892CAEGIS BMD929,208929,208 0890603893CSPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM31,34631,346 0900603895CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS6,3896,389 0910603896CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI443,484443,484 0920603898CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT46,38746,387 0930603904CMISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)58,53058,530 0940603906CREGARDING TRENCH16,19916,199 0950603907CSEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)64,40964,409 0960603913CISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS96,803268,803 Program increase for Israeli Cooperative Programs[172,000] 0970603914CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST386,482386,482 0980603915CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS485,294485,294 0990603920D8ZHUMANITARIAN DEMINING10,19410,194 1000603923D8ZCOALITION WARFARE10,13910,139 1010604016D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM2,9072,907 1020604250D8ZADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES190,000170,000 Program decrease[–20,000] 1030604400D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT3,7023,702 1040604445JWIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE53,00053,000 1070604787JJOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION7,0027,002 1080604828JJOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM7,1027,102 1090604880CLAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)123,444123,444 1100604881CAEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT263,695263,695 1130605170D8ZSUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION12,50012,500 1140303191D8ZJOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM2,6562,656 1150305103CCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE961961 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES6,047,0626,239,062 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 1160604161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD7,9367,936 1170604165D8ZPROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT70,76270,762 1180604384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD345,883345,883 1190604764KADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)25,45925,459 1200604771D8ZJOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)17,56217,562 1210605000BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES6,8876,887 1220605013BLINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT12,53012,530 1230605021SEHOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE286286 1240605022D8ZDEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM3,2443,244 1250605027D8ZOUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES6,5006,500 1260605070SDOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION15,32615,326 1270605075D8ZDCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION19,35119,351 1280605080SDEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM41,46541,465 1290605090SDEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS)10,13510,135 1300605210D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES9,5469,546 1310303141KGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM14,24114,241 1320305304D8ZDOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)3,6603,660 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION610,773610,773 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1330604774D8ZDEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)5,6165,616 1340604875D8ZJOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT3,0923,092 1350604940D8ZCENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)254,503254,503 1360604942D8ZASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS21,66121,661 1380605100D8ZJOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)27,16227,162 1390605104D8ZTECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS24,50124,501 1420605126JJOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)43,17643,176 1450605142D8ZSYSTEMS ENGINEERING44,24644,246 1460605151D8ZSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD2,6652,665 1470605161D8ZNUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY4,3664,366 1480605170D8ZSUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION27,90127,901 1490605200D8ZGENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)2,8552,855 1500605384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM105,944105,944 1560605502KASMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH400400 1590605790D8ZSMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER1,6341,634 1600605798D8ZDEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS12,10512,105 1610605801KADEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)50,38950,389 1620605803SER&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION8,4528,452 1630605804D8ZDEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION15,18719,187 Program increase[4,000] 1640605898EMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D71,36271,362 1650606100D8ZBUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS4,1004,100 1660203345D8ZDEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)1,9561,956 1670204571JJOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT10,32110,321 1700303166JSUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES11,55211,552 1720305193D8ZCYBER INTELLIGENCE6,7486,748 1740804767D8ZCOCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)44,00544,005 1750901598CMANAGEMENT HQ—MDA36,99836,998 1760901598D8WMANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS612612 177A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS44,36744,367 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT887,876891,876 OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 1780604130VENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)3,9883,988 1790605127TREGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA1,7501,750 1800605147TOVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)286286 1810607210D8ZINDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT14,77814,778 1820607310D8ZOPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT2,9532,953 1830607327TGLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)10,35010,350 1840607384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)28,49628,496 1850607828JJOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY11,96811,968 1860208043JPLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)1,8421,842 1870208045KC4I INTEROPERABILITY63,55863,558 1890301144KJOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING3,9313,931 1930302016KNATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT924924 1940302019KDEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION9,6579,657 1950303126KLONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS25,35525,355 1960303131KMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)12,67112,671 1970303135GPUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)222222 1980303136GKEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)32,69832,698 1990303140D8ZINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM11,30411,304 2000303140GINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM125,854145,854 Accelerate SHARKSEER deployment[20,000] 2020303150KGLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM33,79333,793 2030303153KDEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION13,42313,423 2040303170KNET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)3,7743,774 2050303260D8ZDEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)951951 2060303610KTELEPORT PROGRAM2,6972,697 2080304210BBSPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES19,29419,294 2120305103KCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE3,2343,234 2130305125D8ZCRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP)8,8468,846 2170305186D8ZPOLICY R&D PROGRAMS7,0657,065 2180305199D8ZNET CENTRICITY23,98423,984 2210305208BBDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS5,2865,286 2240305208KDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS3,4003,400 2290305327VINSIDER THREAT8,6708,670 2300305387D8ZHOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM2,1102,110 2390708011SINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS22,36622,366 2400708012SLOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES1,5741,574 2410902298JMANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS4,4094,409 2421105219BBMQ–9 UAV9,7029,702 2431105232BBRQ–11 UAV259259 2451160403BBAVIATION SYSTEMS164,233164,233 2471160405BBINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT9,4909,490 2481160408BBOPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS75,25375,253 2521160431BBWARRIOR SYSTEMS24,66124,661 2531160432BBSPECIAL PROGRAMS20,90820,908 2591160480BBSOF TACTICAL VEHICLES3,6723,672 2621160483BBMARITIME SYSTEMS57,90557,905 2641160489BBGLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES3,7883,788 2651160490BBOPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE16,22516,225 265A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,118,5023,113,502 Classified adjustment[–5,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT4,032,0594,047,059 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW16,766,08416,989,432 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0010605118OTEOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION74,58374,583 0020605131OTELIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION45,14245,142 0030605814OTEOPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES48,01353,013 Information Assurance Testing and Exercises[5,000] SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT167,738172,738 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE167,738172,738 TOTAL RDT&E63,533,94763,791,399 XLIII Operation and Maintenance 4301. Operation and maintenance SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS969,2811,069,281 Restore Critical Operations Tempo[100,000] 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES61,99061,990 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE450,987450,487 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS545,773543,773 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,057,4531,046,453 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–10,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 060AVIATION ASSETS1,409,3471,547,947 Restore Critical Aviation Readiness[100,000] UH–60A to UH–60L Conversions/ARNG Modernization[38,600] 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT3,592,3343,567,334 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–19,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–5,500] 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS411,388411,388 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,001,2321,100,732 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[100,000] 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT7,428,9727,346,972 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–27,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–55,000] 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION2,066,4341,976,434 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–7,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–58,000] Transfer to Arlington National Cemetery[–25,000] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS411,863411,363 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 130COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS179,399178,899 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 170COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT432,281429,781 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES20,018,73420,142,834 MOBILIZATION 180STRATEGIC MOBILITY316,776315,776 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 190ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS187,609186,109 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 200INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS6,46386,463 Industrial Base Intiative-Body Armor[80,000] SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION510,848588,348 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 210OFFICER ACQUISITION124,766123,766 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 220RECRUIT TRAINING51,96851,468 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 230ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING43,73543,735 240SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS456,563456,063 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 250SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING886,529876,029 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–8,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 260FLIGHT TRAINING890,070890,070 270PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION193,291190,291 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 280TRAINING SUPPORT552,359551,359 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 290RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING466,927461,427 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–5,500] 300EXAMINING194,588194,588 310OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION205,782197,782 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–8,000] 320CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING150,571149,071 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 330JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS169,784162,784 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–7,000] SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING4,386,9334,348,433 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 350SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION541,877541,877 360CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES722,291722,291 370LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES602,034604,034 Corrosion Mitigation Activities[5,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 380AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT422,277419,777 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 390ADMINISTRATION405,442404,942 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS1,624,7421,622,742 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,500] 410MANPOWER MANAGEMENT289,771289,271 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 420OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT390,924385,424 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–5,500] 430OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT1,118,5401,117,040 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 440ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES241,234239,734 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 450REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT243,509242,509 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 460FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS200,615199,115 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 470INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS462,591462,091 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 480MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS27,37527,375 520ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,030,4111,029,411 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES8,323,6338,307,633 UNDISTRIBUTED 530UNDISTRIBUTED–516,200 Civilian personnel underexecution[–80,000] Foreign Currency adjustments[–48,900] Unobligated balances[–387,300] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–516,200 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY33,240,14832,871,048 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES15,20015,200 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE502,664532,164 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Restore Critical Operations Tempo[30,000] 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS107,489107,489 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT543,989543,989 060AVIATION ASSETS72,96372,963 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT360,082358,082 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS72,49172,491 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE58,87393,873 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[35,000] 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT388,961386,461 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION228,597219,097 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–9,000] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS39,59039,590 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES2,390,8992,441,399 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION10,60810,608 140ADMINISTRATION18,58718,587 150SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS6,6816,681 160MANPOWER MANAGEMENT9,1929,192 170RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING54,60254,102 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES99,67099,170 UNDISTRIBUTED 180UNDISTRIBUTED–38,700 Unobligated balances[–38,700] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–38,700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES2,490,5692,501,869 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS660,648909,748 National Guard combat training center rotations activities[70,000] National Guard critical operations tempo activities[99,600] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Restore Critical Operations Tempo[80,000] 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES165,942165,942 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE733,800733,800 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS83,08483,084 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT22,00522,005 060AVIATION ASSETS920,085920,085 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT680,887673,887 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–5,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS69,72669,726 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE138,263185,863 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,500] Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[49,600] 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT804,517792,017 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–10,000] 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION490,205471,705 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–18,500] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS872,140871,140 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES5,641,3025,899,002 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION6,6906,690 140REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT1,7651,765 150ADMINISTRATION63,07565,075 National Guard State Partnership Program[2,000] 160SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS37,37237,372 170MANPOWER MANAGEMENT6,4846,484 180OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT274,085269,585 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–4,500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES389,471386,971 UNDISTRIBUTED 190UNDISTRIBUTED–72,400 Unobligated balances[–72,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–72,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG6,030,7736,213,573 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS4,947,2025,002,202 FHP Unit Level Maintenance[56,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 020FLEET AIR TRAINING1,647,9431,659,443 FHP Unit Level Maintenance[12,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 030AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES37,05037,050 040AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT96,13995,639 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 050AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT363,763362,763 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 060AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE814,770935,870 Aviation Depot Maintenance[111,000] CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[10,100] 070AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT36,49436,494 080AVIATION LOGISTICS350,641473,141 Aviation Logistics[123,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 090MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS3,865,3793,959,879 Joint High Speed Vessel Operations[10,000] CLF steaming days[13,000] Corrosion Mitigation Activities[5,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–5,500] T-AKEs to Full Operational Status[72,000] 100SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING711,243709,743 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 110SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE5,296,4085,327,608 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[33,700] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 120SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,339,0771,335,877 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[300] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–3,500] 130COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS708,634706,634 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] 140ELECTRONIC WARFARE91,59991,099 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 150SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE207,038206,538 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 160WARFARE TACTICS432,715431,715 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 170OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY338,116337,616 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 180COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES892,316891,316 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 190EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE128,486128,486 200DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT2,4722,472 210COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS101,200100,700 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 220COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT188,920186,420 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] 230CRUISE MISSILE109,911109,911 240FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE1,172,8231,172,823 250IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT104,139104,139 260WEAPONS MAINTENANCE490,911490,411 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 270OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT324,861323,861 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 290ENTERPRISE INFORMATION936,743934,243 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] 300SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION1,483,4951,422,995 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–60,500] 310BASE OPERATING SUPPORT4,398,6674,364,167 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–34,500] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES31,619,15531,941,255 MOBILIZATION 320SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE526,926526,926 330READY RESERVE FORCE195195 340AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS6,7046,704 350SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS251,538205,538 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[–46,000] 360EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS124,323124,323 370INDUSTRIAL READINESS2,3232,323 380COAST GUARD SUPPORT20,33320,333 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION932,342886,342 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 390OFFICER ACQUISITION156,214155,714 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 400RECRUIT TRAINING8,8638,963 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[100] 410RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS148,150148,150 420SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING601,501604,201 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[7,200] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–4,500] 430FLIGHT TRAINING8,2398,239 440PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION164,214165,362 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[1,000] Naval Sea Cadets[1,148] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 450TRAINING SUPPORT182,619183,019 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[900] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 460RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING230,589230,089 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 470OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION115,595114,095 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 480CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING79,60679,106 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 490JUNIOR ROTC41,66439,664 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING1,737,2541,736,602 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 500ADMINISTRATION858,871852,871 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–6,000] 510EXTERNAL RELATIONS12,80712,807 520CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT119,863119,863 530MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT356,113353,013 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[900] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–4,000] 540OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT255,605255,105 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 550SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS339,802337,802 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] 570SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION172,203172,203 590PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN283,621282,621 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 600ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT1,111,4641,110,464 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 610HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT43,23243,232 620COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS25,68925,689 630SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS73,15972,659 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 640NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE548,640548,140 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 700INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES4,7134,713 720ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS531,324530,324 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES4,737,1064,721,506 UNDISTRIBUTED 730UNDISTRIBUTED–402,900 Civilian personnel underexecution[–80,000] Foreign Currency adjustments[–74,200] Unobligated balances[–248,700] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–402,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY39,025,85738,882,805 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATIONAL FORCES905,744944,044 Corrosion Mitigation Activities[5,000] Crisis Response Operations Unfunded Requirement[33,800] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 020FIELD LOGISTICS921,543920,543 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE229,058280,058 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[51,000] 040MARITIME PREPOSITIONING87,66087,660 050SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION573,926556,926 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–16,000] 060BASE OPERATING SUPPORT1,983,1181,977,618 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–4,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES4,701,0494,766,849 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 070RECRUIT TRAINING18,22718,227 080OFFICER ACQUISITION948948 090SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING98,44898,448 100PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION42,30542,305 110TRAINING SUPPORT330,156328,156 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,500] 120RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING161,752161,752 130OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION19,13718,637 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 140JUNIOR ROTC23,27723,277 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING694,250691,750 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION36,35936,359 160ADMINISTRATION362,608352,508 Marine Museum Unjustified Growth[–9,100] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 180ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT70,51570,515 180ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS44,70644,706 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES514,188504,088 UNDISTRIBUTED 190UNDISTRIBUTED–109,900 Foreign Currency adjustments[–28,400] Unobligated balances[–81,500] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–109,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS5,909,4875,852,787 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS565,842573,742 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[7,900] 020INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE5,9485,948 040AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE82,63684,936 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[2,300] 050AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT353353 060AVIATION LOGISTICS7,0077,007 070MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS8,1908,190 080SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING556556 090SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE4,5714,571 100COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS14,47214,472 110COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES119,056119,056 120WEAPONS MAINTENANCE1,8521,852 130ENTERPRISE INFORMATION25,35425,354 140SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION48,27146,271 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 150BASE OPERATING SUPPORT101,921101,421 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES986,029993,729 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160ADMINISTRATION1,5201,520 170MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT12,99812,998 180SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS3,3953,395 190ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT3,1583,158 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES21,07121,071 UNDISTRIBUTED 210UNDISTRIBUTED–10,500 Unobligated balances[–10,500] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–10,500 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES1,007,1001,004,300 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATING FORCES93,09393,093 020DEPOT MAINTENANCE18,37718,377 030SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION29,23227,732 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,500] 040BASE OPERATING SUPPORT106,447105,447 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES247,149244,649 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 050SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION914914 060ADMINISTRATION11,83111,831 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING8,6888,688 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES21,43321,433 UNDISTRIBUTED 080UNDISTRIBUTED–100 Unobligated balances[–100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE268,582265,982 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES3,163,4573,256,557 Corrosion Prevention[5,000] Cyber Weapon System Ops[50,000] Cyberspace Defense Weapon System and Cyber Mission Forces[30,000] Nuclear Force Improvement Program—Security Forces[8,600] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 020COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES1,694,3391,686,339 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–8,000] 030AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)1,579,1781,574,678 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,500] 040DEPOT MAINTENANCE6,119,5226,111,522 RC/OC–135 Contractor Logistics Support Unjustified Growth[–8,000] 050FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION1,453,5891,447,989 Nuclear Force Improvement Program—Installation Surety[3,400] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–9,000] 060BASE SUPPORT2,599,4192,587,419 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–10,000] 070GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING908,790919,861 Program increase[14,571] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 080OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS856,306862,906 Nuclear Force Improvement Program—ICBM Training Hardware[9,600] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–3,000] 090TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES800,689800,189 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 100LAUNCH FACILITIES282,710282,710 110SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS397,818397,318 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 120COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT871,840884,440 PACOM Prepositioned Munition Shortfall Mitigation[19,100] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–6,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 130COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS237,348237,348 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES20,965,00521,049,276 MOBILIZATION 140AIRLIFT OPERATIONS1,968,8101,966,310 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,500] 150MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS139,743139,243 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 160DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,534,5601,534,560 170FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION173,627171,627 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] 180BASE SUPPORT688,801686,301 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,000] SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION4,505,5414,498,041 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 190OFFICER ACQUISITION82,39682,396 200RECRUIT TRAINING19,85219,852 210RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)76,13473,134 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–3,000] 220FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION212,226208,726 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–3,500] 230BASE SUPPORT759,809754,309 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–4,500] 240SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING356,157356,157 250FLIGHT TRAINING697,594694,594 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,500] 260PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION219,441218,441 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 270TRAINING SUPPORT91,00191,001 280DEPOT MAINTENANCE316,688316,688 290RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING73,92073,920 300EXAMINING3,1213,121 310OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION181,718174,218 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–7,500] 320CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING147,667147,167 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 330JUNIOR ROTC63,25060,250 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–3,000] SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING3,300,9743,273,974 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 340LOGISTICS OPERATIONS1,003,5131,044,013 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] SDT Program[41,000] 350TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES843,449841,449 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] 360DEPOT MAINTENANCE78,12678,126 370FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION247,677244,177 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–3,500] 380BASE SUPPORT1,103,4421,096,442 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–5,500] 390ADMINISTRATION597,234596,234 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS506,840506,840 410OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES892,256889,256 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–2,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 420CIVIL AIR PATROL24,98124,981 450INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT92,41991,919 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 450ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,169,7361,159,236 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–9,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES6,559,6736,572,673 UNDISTRIBUTED 460UNDISTRIBUTED–242,900 Civilian personnel underexecution[–80,000] Foreign Currency adjustments[–51,900] Readiness support[221,500] Unobligated balances[–332,500] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–242,900 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE35,331,19335,151,064 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES1,719,4671,719,467 020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS211,132211,132 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE530,301530,301 040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION85,67284,672 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 050BASE SUPPORT367,966365,466 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–2,500] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES2,914,5382,911,038 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 060ADMINISTRATION59,89959,899 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING14,50914,509 080MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)20,34520,345 090OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)6,5516,551 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES101,304101,304 UNDISTRIBUTED 110UNDISTRIBUTED–13,400 Unobligated balances[–13,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–13,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE3,015,8422,998,942 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 010AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS3,367,7293,366,729 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS718,295717,295 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,528,6951,528,695 040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION137,604133,604 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–4,000] 050BASE SUPPORT581,536569,036 Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–12,500] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES6,333,8596,315,359 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 060ADMINISTRATION27,81227,812 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING31,18830,688 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES59,00058,500 UNDISTRIBUTED 080UNDISTRIBUTED–800 Unobligated balances[–800] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–800 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG6,392,8596,373,059 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF462,107460,607 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 020SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES4,762,2454,707,945 MSV—USSOCOM Maritime Support Vessel[–20,300] NCR—USSOCOM National Capitol Region Office[–5,000] POTFF—Human Performance[–23,300] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–26,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–5,000] RSCC—Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers[–3,600] USSOCOM Flight Operations (Flight Hours)[31,460] USSOCOM Joint Special Operations University[–2,560] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES5,224,3525,168,552 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 030DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY135,437135,437 040NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY80,08280,082 050SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING371,620371,620 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING587,139587,139 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 060CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS119,888140,888 STARBASE[21,000] 080DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY556,493556,493 090DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY1,340,3741,339,874 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 100DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY633,300613,300 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–20,000] 110DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY1,263,6781,258,678 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–4,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–1,000] 130DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY26,71026,710 140DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY381,470380,470 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 150DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY194,520183,020 Program decrease[–10,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,500] 160DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE21,48521,485 170DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY544,786523,786 Global Security Contingency Fund[–30,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] Warsaw Initiative Fund/Partnership For Peace[10,000] 180DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE527,812527,312 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 200DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION32,78732,787 230DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY2,566,4242,551,924 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–6,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–8,500] 240MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY416,644415,144 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–500] 260OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT186,987106,391 Office of Economic Adjustment[–80,596] 265OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT18,944 Program increase[10,000] Transfer from line 270[8,944] 270OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE1,891,1631,790,419 BRAC 2015 Round Planning and Analyses[–4,800] Corrosion Prevention Program Office[5,000] DOD Rewards Program Underexecution[–4,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–51,500] Reduction in service contracts for facilities maintenance[–36,500] Transfer funding for Office of Net Assessment to new line 265[–8,944] 280SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES87,91587,915 290WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES610,982609,982 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–1,000] 290ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS13,983,32313,987,323 Classified adjustment[10,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–6,000] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES25,386,74125,172,845 UNDISTRIBUTED 300UNDISTRIBUTED–280,400 Civilian personnel underexecution[–75,000] Foreign Currency adjustments[–17,500] Impact Aid[25,000] Unobligated balances[–212,900] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED–280,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE31,198,23230,648,136 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 010US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE13,72313,723 020OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID100,000104,500 Humanitarian Mine Action[5,000] Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] 030COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION365,108354,608 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–10,500] 040ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD212,875209,375 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–3,500] 050ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY201,560201,560 060ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY277,294277,294 070ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE408,716408,716 080ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE8,5478,547 090ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES208,353208,353 100OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND5,0000 Program decrease[–5,000] 110SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE10,0005,200 Reduction in contracts for Other Services[–500] Unjustified program increase[–4,300] SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS1,811,1761,791,876 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS1,811,1761,791,876 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE165,721,818164,555,441 XLIV Military Personnel 4401. Military personnel SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized Military Personnel Appropriations128,957,593129,007,023 Air Force airborne warning and control system personnel12,200 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[48,000] Foreign Currency Adjustments[–193,200] Military Personnel unobligated balances[–360,470] Recalcualtion from CPI–1 to CPI[534,900] Special training and exercises for National Guard State Partnership Program[8,000] Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions6,236,0926,237,092 CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH)[1,000] XLV Other Authorizations 4501. Other authorizations SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS13,72713,727 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY13,72713,727 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL)61,71761,717 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE61,71761,717 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)44,29344,293 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE44,29344,293 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,114,7311,214,731 Working Capital Fund, DECA[100,000] TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,114,7311,214,731 CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION OPERATION & MAINTENANCE222,728222,728 RDT&E595,913595,913 PROCUREMENT10,22710,227 TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION828,868828,868 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE719,096719,096 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM101,591101,591 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF820,687820,687 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE310,830310,830 PROCUREMENT1,0001,000 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL311,830311,830 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM OPERATION & MAINTENANCE IN-HOUSE CARE8,799,0868,884,386 Implementation of Benefit Reform Proposal[–30,000] Restoration of MHS Modernization[92,000] USSOCOM Behavioral Health and Warrior Care Management Program[23,300] PRIVATE SECTOR CARE15,412,59915,354,599 Implementation of Benefit Reform Proposal[–58,000] CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT2,462,0962,462,096 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT1,557,3471,557,347 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES366,223366,223 EDUCATION AND TRAINING750,866750,866 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS1,683,6941,683,694 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT R&D RESEARCH10,31720,317 Surgical Critical Care Research[10,000] R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT49,01549,015 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT226,410226,410 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION97,78797,787 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT217,898217,898 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT38,07538,075 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT15,09215,092 PROCUREMENT PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING13,05713,057 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION283,030283,030 PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM3,1453,145 PROC IEHR9,1819,181 UNDISTRIBUTED UNDISTRIBUTED–161,857–586,557 Foreign Currency adjustments[–13,100] Unobligated balances[–411,600] TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM31,833,06131,445,661 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS35,028,91434,741,514 XLVI Military construction 4601. Military construction SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) AccountState/Country and InstallationProject TitleBudget RequestHouse Agreement California ArmyConcordAccess Control Point9,9009,900 ArmyConcordGeneral Purpose Maintenance Shop5,3005,300 ArmyFort IrwinUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar45,00045,000 Colorado ArmyFort Carson, ColoradoAircraft Maintenance Hangar60,00060,000 ArmyFort Carson, ColoradoUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar29,00029,000 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ArmyGuantanamo BayDining Facility12,00012,000 ArmyGuantanamo BayHealth Clinic11,80011,800 ArmyGuantanamo BayHigh Value Detainee Complex069,000 Hawaii ArmyFort ShafterCommand and Control Facility (Scif)96,00083,000 Japan ArmyKadena AbMissile Magazine10,60010,600 Kentucky ArmyBlue Grass Army DepotShipping and Receiving Building015,000 ArmyFort Campbell, KentuckyUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar23,00023,000 New York ArmyFort Drum, New YorkUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar27,00027,000 ArmyU.S. Military AcademyCadet Barracks, Incr 358,00058,000 Pennsylvania ArmyLetterkenny Army DepotRebuild Shop16,00016,000 South Carolina ArmyFort JacksonTrainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph152,00052,000 Texas ArmyFort HoodSimulations Center046,000 Virginia ArmyFort LeeAdv. Individual Training Barracks Complex, Phase 3086,000 ArmyJoint Base Langley-EustisTactical Vehicle Hardstand7,7007,700 Worldwide Unspecified ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsHost Nation Support Fy1533,00033,000 ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMinor Construction Fy1525,00025,000 ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design Fy1518,12718,127 Total Military Construction, Army539,427742,427 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Arizona NavyYumaAviation Maintenance and Support Complex16,60816,608 Bahrain Island NavySw AsiaP–8a Hangar27,82627,826 California NavyBridgeportE-Lmr Communications Towers16,18016,180 NavySan DiegoSteam Distribution System Decentralization47,11047,110 District of Columbia NavyDistrict of ColumbiaElectronics Science and Technology Laboratory31,73531,735 Djibouti NavyCamp Lemonier, DjiboutiEntry Control Point9,9239,923 Florida NavyJacksonvilleMh60 Parking Apron8,5838,583 NavyJacksonvilleP–8a Runway Thresholds and Taxiways21,65221,652 NavyMayportLcs Operational Training Facility20,52020,520 Guam NavyJoint Region MarianasGse Shops at North Ramp21,88021,880 NavyJoint Region MarianasMwss Facilities at North Ramp28,77128,771 Hawaii NavyKaneohe BayFacility Modifications for Vmu, Mwsd, & Ch53e51,18251,182 NavyKaneohe BayRoad and Infrastructure Improvements2,2002,200 NavyPearl HarborSubmarine Maneuvering Room Trainer Facility9,6989,698 Japan NavyIwakuniSecurity Mods Dpri Mc167–T (Cvw–5 E2d Ea–18g)6,4156,415 NavyKadena AbAircraft Maint Hangar Alterations and Sap-F19,41119,411 NavyMCAS FutenmaHangar & Rinse Facility Modernizations4,6394,639 NavyOkinawaLhd Practice Site Improvements35,68535,685 Maryland NavyAnnapolisCenter for Cyber Security Studies Building120,112100,112 NavyIndian HeadAdvanced Energetics Research Lab Complex Ph 215,34615,346 NavyPatuxent RiverAtlantic Test Range Facility9,8609,860 Nevada NavyFallonAir Wing Training Facility27,76327,763 NavyFallonFacility Alteration for F–35 Training Mission3,4993,499 North Carolina NavyCherry Point Marine Corps Air StationWater Treatment Plant Replacement41,58841,588 Pennsylvania NavyPhiladelphiaOhio Replacement Power & Propulsion Facility23,98523,985 South Carolina NavyCharlestonNuclear Power Operational Support Facility35,71635,716 Spain NavyRotaShip Berthing Power Upgrades20,23320,233 Virginia NavyDahlgrenMissile Support Facility27,31327,313 NavyNorfolkEOD Consolidated Ops & Logistics Facilities39,27439,274 NavyPortsmouthSubmarine Maintenance Facility9,7439,743 NavyQuanticoAmmunition Supply Point Expansion12,61312,613 NavyYorktownBachelor Enlisted Quarters19,15219,152 NavyYorktownFast Company Training Facility7,8367,836 Washington NavyBremertonIntegrated Water Treatment Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 516,40116,401 NavyKitsapExplosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc)83,77883,778 NavyPort AngelesTps Port Angeles Forward Operating Location20,63820,638 NavyWhidbey IslandP–8a Aircraft Apron and Supporting Facilities24,39024,390 Worldwide Unspecified NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsF–35c Facility Addition and Modification16,59416,594 NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsF–35c Operational Training Facility22,39122,391 NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMcon Design Funds33,36633,366 NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction7,1637,163 Total Military Construction, Navy1,018,772998,772 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Alaska AFClear AFSEmergency Power Plant Fuel Storage11,50011,500 Arizona AFLuke AFBF–35 Aircraft Mx Hangar—Sqdn #211,20011,200 AFLuke AFBF–35 Flightline Fillstands15,60015,600 Guam AFJoint Region MarianasGuam Strike Fuel Systems Maint.hangar Inc 264,00064,000 AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Combat Comm Infrastr Facility3,7503,750 AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Red Horse Logistics Facility3,1503,150 AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Satellite Fire Station6,5006,500 Kansas AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Adal Mobility Bag Strg Expansion2,3002,300 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Adal Regional Mx Tng Facility16,10016,100 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Alter Composite Mx Shop4,1004,100 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Alter Taxiway Foxtrot5,5005,500 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Fuselage Trainer6,4006,400 Maryland AFFort MeadeCybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 2166,000166,000 Massachusetts AFHanscom AFBDormitory (72 Rm)13,50013,500 Nebraska AFOffutt AFBUsstratcom Replacement Facility- Incr 4180,000180,000 Nevada AFNellis AFBF–22 Flight Simulator Facility14,00014,000 AFNellis AFBF–35 Aircraft Mx Unit—4 Bay Hangar31,00031,000 AFNellis AFBF–35 Weapons School Facility8,9008,900 New Jersey AFJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstFire Station5,9005,900 Oklahoma AFTinker AFBKC–46a Depot Maint Complex Spt Infrastr48,00048,000 AFTinker AFBKC–46a Two-Bay Depot Mx Hangar63,00063,000 Texas AFJoint Base San AntonioFire Station5,8005,800 United Kingdom AFCroughton RafJiac Consolidation—Phase 192,22392,223 Worldwide Unspecified AFVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design10,73810,738 AFVarious Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Military Construction22,61322,613 Total Military Construction, Air Force811,774811,774 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Arizona Def-WideFort HuachucaJitc Building 52120 Renovation1,8711,871 Australia Def-WideGeraldtonCombined Communications Gateway Geraldton9,6009,600 Belgium Def-WideBrusselsBrussells Elementary/High School Replacement41,62641,626 Def-WideBrusselsNATO Headquarters Facility37,91837,918 California Def-WideCamp Pendleton, CaliforniaSOF Comm/Elec Maintenance Facility11,84111,841 Def-WideCoronadoSOF Logistics Support Unit 1 Ops Facility #141,74041,740 Def-WideCoronadoSOF Support Activity Ops Facility #228,60028,600 Def-WideLemooreReplace Fuel Storage & Distribution Fac.52,50052,500 Colorado Def-WidePeterson AFBDental Clinic Replacement15,20015,200 Conus Def-WideVarious LocationsEast Coast Missile Site Planning and Design020,000 Conus Classified Def-WideClassified LocationSOF Skills Training Facility53,07353,073 Georgia Def-WideHunter Army AirfieldSOF Company Operations Facility7,6927,692 Def-WideRobins AFBReplace Hydrant Fuel System19,90019,900 Germany Def-WideRhine Ordnance BarracksMedical Center Replacement Incr 4259,695189,695 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Def-WideGuantanamo BayReplace Fuel Tank11,10011,100 Def-WideGuantanamo BayW.t. Sampson E/M and Hs Consolid./Replacement65,19065,190 Hawaii Def-WideJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamReplace Fuel Tanks3,0003,000 Def-WideJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamUpgrade Fire Supression & Ventilation Sys.49,90049,900 Japan Def-WideMisawa AbEdgren High School Renovation37,77537,775 Def-WideOkinawaKillin Elementary Replacement/Renovation71,48171,481 Def-WideOkinawaKubasaki High School Replacement/Renovation99,42099,420 Def-WideSaseboE.j. King High School Replacement/Renovation37,68137,681 Kentucky Def-WideFort Campbell, KentuckySOF System Integration Maintenance Office Fac18,00018,000 Maryland Def-WideFort MeadeNSAW Campus Feeders Phase 154,20754,207 Def-WideFort MeadeNSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 345,52145,521 Def-WideJoint Base AndrewsConstruct Hydrant Fuel System18,30018,300 Michigan Def-WideSelfridge ANGBReplace Fuel Distribution Facilities35,10035,100 Mississippi Def-WideStennisSOF Applied Instruction Facility10,32310,323 Def-WideStennisSOF Land Acquisition Western Maneuver Area17,22417,224 Nevada Def-WideFallonSOF Tactical Ground Mob. Vehicle Maint Fac.20,24120,241 New Mexico Def-WideCannon AFBSOF Squadron Operations Facility (Sts)23,33323,333 North Carolina Def-WideCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaLejeune High School Addition/Renovation41,30641,306 Def-WideCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaSOF Intel/Ops Expansion11,44211,442 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Battalion Operations Facility37,07437,074 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility8,0008,000 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Training Command Building48,06248,062 Def-WideSeymour Johnson AFBReplace Hydrant Fuel System8,5008,500 South Carolina Def-WideBeaufortReplace Fuel Distibution Facilities40,60040,600 South Dakota Def-WideEllsworth AFBConstruct Hydrant System8,0008,000 Texas Def-WideFort BlissHospital Replacement Incr 6131,500201,500 Def-WideJoint Base San AntonioMedical Clinic Replacement38,30038,300 Virginia Def-WideCraney IslandReplace & Alter Fuel Distibution Facilities36,50036,500 Def-WideDef Distribution Depot RichmondReplace Access Control Point5,7005,700 Def-WideFort BelvoirParking Lot7,2397,239 Def-WideJoint Base Langley-EustisHopsital Addition/Cup Replacement41,20041,200 Def-WideJoint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—StorySOF Human Performance Center11,20011,200 Def-WideJoint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—StorySOF Indoor Dynamic Range14,88814,888 Def-WideJoint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—StorySOF Mobile Comm Det Support Facility13,50013,500 Def-WidePentagonRedundant Chilled Water Loop15,10015,100 Worldwide Unspecified Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsContingency Construction9,0000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsEcip Design10,00010,000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsEnergy Conservation Investment Program150,000150,000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsExercise Related Minor Construction8,5818,581 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design745745 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design38,70418,704 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design1,1831,183 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design42,38742,387 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design599599 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design24,4254,425 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction5,9325,932 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction6,8466,846 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction10,33410,334 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction2,7002,700 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction2,0002,000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction4,1004,100 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Milcon2,9942,994 Def-WideVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design24,19724,197 Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide2,061,8902,032,890 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Kentucky Chem DemilBlue Grass Army DepotAmmunition Demilitarization Ph Xv38,71538,715 Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense38,71538,715 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified NATONATO Security Investment ProgramNATO Security Investment Program199,700199,700 Total NATO Security Investment Program199,700199,700 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Delaware Army NGDagsboroNational Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop010,800 Maine Army NGAugustaNational Guard Reserve Center30,00030,000 Maryland Army NGHavre DE GraceNational Guard Readiness Center12,40012,400 Montana Army NGHelenaNational Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt38,00038,000 New Mexico Army NGAlamogordoNational Guard Readiness Center05,000 North Dakota Army NGValley CityNational Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop10,80010,800 Vermont Army NGNorth Hyde ParkNational Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop4,4004,400 Washington Army NGYakimaEnlisted Barracks, Transient Training019,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army NGUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design17,60017,600 Army NGUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction13,72013,720 Total Military Construction, Army National Guard126,920161,720 <bold></bold><bold></bold> California Army ResFresnoArmy Reserve Center/AMSA22,00022,000 Army ResMarch (Riverside)Army Reserve Center025,000 Colorado Army ResFort Carson, ColoradoTraining Building Addition5,0005,000 Illinois Army ResArlington HeightsArmy Reserve Center026,000 Mississippi Army ResStarkvilleArmy Reserve Center09,300 New Jersey Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstArmy Reserve Center26,00026,000 New York Army ResMattydaleArmy Reserve Center/AMSA23,00023,000 Virginia Army ResFort LeeTass Training Center16,00016,000 Worldwide Unspecified Army ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design8,3378,337 Army ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction3,6093,609 Total Military Construction, Army Reserve103,946164,246 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Pennsylvania N/MC ResPittsburghReserve Training Center—Pittsburgh, PA17,65017,650 Washington N/MC ResWhidbey IslandC–40 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar27,75527,755 Worldwide Unspecified N/MC ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMcnr Planning & Design2,1232,123 N/MC ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMcnr Unspecified Minor Construction4,0004,000 Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve51,52851,528 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Connecticut Air NGBradley IAPConstruct C–130 Fuel Cell and Corrosion Contr16,30616,306 Iowa Air NGDes Moines MapRemotely Piloted Aircraft and Targeting Group8,9938,993 Michigan Air NGW. K. Kellog Regional AirportRpa Beddown6,0006,000 New Hampshire Air NGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Airfield Pavements & Hydrant Syst7,1007,100 Air NGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Fuel Cell Building 25316,80016,800 Air NGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Maint Hangar Building 25418,00218,002 Pennsylvania Air NGWillow Grove ArfRpa Operations Center5,6625,662 Worldwide Unspecified Air NGVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design7,7007,700 Air NGVarious Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction8,1008,100 Total Military Construction, Air National Guard94,66394,663 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Georgia AF ResRobins AFBAfrc Consolidated Mission Complex, Ph I27,70027,700 North Carolina AF ResSeymour Johnson AFBKC–135 Tanker Parking Apron Expansion9,8009,800 Texas AF ResFort WorthEOD Facility3,7003,700 Worldwide Unspecified AF ResVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design6,8926,892 AF ResVarious Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Military Construction1,4001,400 Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve49,49249,492 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Illinois FH Con ArmyRock IslandFamily Housing New Construction19,50019,500 Korea FH Con ArmyCamp WalkerFamily Housing New Construction57,80057,800 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFamily Housing P & D1,3091,309 Total Family Housing Construction, Army78,60978,609 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings14,13614,136 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeased Housing112,504112,504 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property Facilities65,24565,245 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account43,48043,480 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account3,1173,117 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMilitary Housing Privitization Initiative20,00020,000 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous700700 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices9,1089,108 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities82,68682,686 Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army350,976350,976 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account38,54338,543 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsHousing Privatization40,76140,761 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing43,65143,651 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance99,93499,934 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account47,83447,834 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous Account1,9931,993 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account12,70912,709 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account42,32242,322 Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force327,747327,747 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FH Con NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDesign472472 FH Con NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsImprovements15,94015,940 Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps16,41216,412 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account17,88117,881 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing65,99965,999 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property97,61297,612 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account55,12455,124 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous Account366366 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrivatization Support Costs27,87627,876 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account18,07918,079 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account71,09271,092 Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps354,029354,029 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account3,3623,362 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account2020 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account746746 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing11,17911,179 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing42,08342,083 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property2,1282,128 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property344344 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account378378 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account3131 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account170170 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account659659 Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide61,10061,100 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified FHIFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFamily Housing Improvement Fund1,6621,662 Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund1,6621,662 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified BRACBase Realignment & Closure, ArmyBase Realignment and Closure84,41784,417 BRACBase Realignment & Closure, NavyBase Realignment & Closure57,40657,406 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDod BRAC Activities—Air Force90,97690,976 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–100: Planing, Design and Management7,6827,682 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–101: Various Locations21,41621,416 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–138: NAS Brunswick, ME904904 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO4040 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA6,0666,066 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap1,1781,178 Total Base Realignment and Closure Account270,085270,085 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified PYSUnspecified Worldwide Locations42 Usc 33740–100,000 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsArmy0–79,577 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsNATO Security Investment Program0–25,000 Total Prior Year Savings0–204,577 <bold></bold><bold></bold> Worldwide Unspecified GRUnspecified Worldwide LocationsGeneral Reductions0–69,000 Total General Reductions0–69,000 Total Military Construction6,557,4476,532,970 XLVII Department of Energy National Security Programs 4701. Department of Energy national security programs SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) ProgramFY 2015 RequestHouse Authorized Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Nuclear Energy104,000104,000 Atomic Energy Defense Activities National nuclear security administration: Weapons activities8,314,9028,462,602 Defense nuclear nonproliferation1,555,1561,565,156 Naval reactors1,377,1001,387,100 Federal salaries and expenses410,842386,842 Total, National nuclear security administration11,658,00011,801,700 Environmental and other defense activities: Defense environmental cleanup5,327,5384,870,538 Other defense activities753,000758,300 Total, Environmental & other defense activities6,080,5385,628,838 Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities17,738,53817,430,538 Total, Discretionary Funding17,842,53817,534,538 Nuclear Energy Idaho sitewide safeguards and security104,000104,000 Weapons Activities Directed stockpile work Life extension programs B61 Life extension program643,000643,000 W76 Life extension program259,168273,768 W88 Alt 370165,400166,600 Cruise missile warhead life extension program9,41817,018 Total, Life extension programs1,076,9861,100,386 Stockpile systems B61 Stockpile systems109,615109,615 W76 Stockpile systems45,72845,728 W78 Stockpile systems62,70366,403 W80 Stockpile systems70,61070,610 B83 Stockpile systems63,13663,136 W87 Stockpile systems91,25591,255 W88 Stockpile systems88,06088,060 Total, Stockpile systems531,107534,807 Weapons dismantlement and disposition Operations and maintenance30,00830,008 Stockpile services Production support350,942363,242 Research and development support29,64929,649 R&D certification and safety201,479212,479 Management, technology, and production241,805241,805 Plutonium sustainment144,575172,875 Tritium readiness140,053140,053 Total, Stockpile services1,108,5031,160,103 Total, Directed stockpile work2,746,6042,825,304 Campaigns: Science campaign Advanced certification58,74758,747 Primary assessment technologies112,000112,000 Dynamic materials properties117,999117,999 Advanced radiography79,34079,340 Secondary assessment technologies88,34488,344 Total, Science campaign456,430456,430 Engineering campaign Enhanced surety52,00354,403 Weapon systems engineering assessment technology20,83220,832 Nuclear survivability25,37125,371 Enhanced surveillance37,79941,399 Total, Engineering campaign136,005142,005 Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign Ignition77,99477,994 Support of other stockpile programs23,59823,598 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support61,29761,297 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion5,0245,024 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas9,1009,100 Facility operations and target production335,882335,882 Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign512,895512,895 Advanced simulation and computing campaign610,108610,108 Nonnuclear Readiness Campaign125,909125,909 Total, Campaigns1,841,3471,847,347 Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) Operations of facilities Kansas City Plant125,000125,000 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory71,00071,000 Los Alamos National Laboratory198,000198,000 Nevada National Security Site89,00089,000 Pantex75,00075,000 Sandia National Laboratory106,000106,000 Savannah River Site81,00081,000 Y–12 National security complex151,000151,000 Total, Operations of facilities896,000896,000 Program readiness136,700136,700 Material recycle and recovery138,900138,900 Containers26,00026,000 Storage40,80040,800 Maintenance and repair of facilities205,000220,000 Recapitalization209,321248,321 Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities756,721810,721 Construction: 15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–122,0002,000 15–D–612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL2,0002,000 15–D–611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL4,0004,000 15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX11,80011,800 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL16,06216,062 12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL6,9386,938 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL10,00010,000 07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL15,00015,000 06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12335,000335,000 Total, Construction402,800402,800 Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities2,055,5212,109,521 Secure transportation asset Operations and equipment132,851132,851 Program direction100,962100,962 Total, Secure transportation asset233,813233,813 Nuclear counterterrorism incident response173,440182,440 Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation Programs76,90176,901 Site stewardship Environmental projects and operations53,00053,000 Nuclear materials integration16,21816,218 Minority serving institution partnerships program13,23113,231 Total, Site stewardship82,44982,449 Defense nuclear security Operations and maintenance618,123618,123 Total, Defense nuclear security618,123618,123 Information technology and cybersecurity179,646179,646 Legacy contractor pensions307,058307,058 Total, Weapons Activities8,314,9028,462,602 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs Global threat reduction initiative333,488413,488 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D Operations and maintenance360,808430,808 Nonproliferation and international security141,359177,759 International material protection and cooperation305,467129,067 Fissile materials disposition U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition Operations and maintenance U.S. plutonium disposition85,00085,000 U.S. uranium disposition25,00025,000 Total, Operations and maintenance110,000110,000 Construction: 99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC196,000196,000 99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC5,1255,125 Total, Construction201,125201,125 Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition311,125311,125 Russian surplus fillile materials disposition Total, Fissile materials disposition311,125311,125 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs1,452,2471,462,247 Legacy contractor pensions102,909102,909 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation1,555,1561,565,156 Naval Reactors Naval reactors operations and infrastructure412,380422,380 Naval reactors development425,700425,700 Ohio replacement reactor systems development156,100156,100 S8G Prototype refueling126,400126,400 Program direction46,60046,600 Construction: 15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3400400 15–D–903 KL Fire System Upgrade600600 15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility1,5001,500 15–D–901 KS Central office building and prototype staff facility24,00024,000 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF141,100141,100 13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL14,42014,420 13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO20,10020,100 10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL7,4007,400 08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 receiving/discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID400400 Total, Construction209,920209,920 Total, Naval Reactors1,377,1001,387,100 Federal Salaries And Expenses Program direction410,842386,842 Total, Office Of The Administrator410,842386,842 Defense Environmental Cleanup Closure sites: Closure sites administration4,8894,889 Hanford site: River corridor and other cleanup operations332,788332,788 Central plateau remediation: Central plateau remediation474,292474,292 Construction: 15–D–401 Containerized sludge (Rl-0012)26,29026,290 Total, Central plateau remediation500,582500,582 Richland community and regulatory support14,70114,701 Total, Hanford site848,071848,071 Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho cleanup and waste disposition364,293364,293 Idaho community and regulatory support2,9102,910 Total, Idaho National Laboratory367,203367,203 NNSA sites Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory1,3661,366 Nevada64,85164,851 Sandia National Laboratories2,8012,801 Los Alamos National Laboratory196,017196,017 Construction: 15–D–406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl-Lanl-0030)28,60028,600 Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites293,635293,635 Oak Ridge Reservation: OR Nuclear facility D & D OR Nuclear facility D & D73,15573,155 Construction: 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility9,4009,400 Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D82,55582,555 U233 Disposition Program41,62641,626 OR cleanup and disposition: OR cleanup and disposition71,13771,137 Construction: 15–D–405—Sludge Buildout4,2004,200 Total, OR cleanup and disposition75,33775,337 OR reservation community and regulatory support4,3654,365 Solid waste stabilization and disposition, Oak Ridge technology development3,0003,000 Total, Oak Ridge Reservation206,883206,883 Office of River Protection: Waste treatment and immobilization plant 01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction575,000575,000 01–D–16E Pretreatment facility115,000115,000 Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant690,000690,000 Tank farm activities Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition522,000522,000 Construction: 15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford23,00023,000 Total, Tank farm activities545,000545,000 Total, Office of River protection1,235,0001,235,000 Savannah River sites: Savannah River risk management operations416,276416,276 SR community and regulatory support11,01311,013 Radioactive liquid tank waste: Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition553,175553,175 Construction: 15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #634,64234,642 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River135,000135,000 Total, Construction169,642169,642 Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste722,817722,817 Total, Savannah River site1,150,1061,150,106 Waste isolation pilot plant216,020216,020 Program direction280,784280,784 Program support14,97914,979 Safeguards and Security: Oak Ridge Reservation16,38216,382 Paducah7,2977,297 Portsmouth8,4928,492 Richland/Hanford Site63,66863,668 Savannah River Site132,196132,196 Waste Isolation Pilot Project4,4554,455 West Valley1,4711,471 Technology development13,00719,007 Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup4,864,5384,870,538 Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution463,0000 Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup5,327,5384,870,538 Other Defense Activities Specialized security activities202,152207,452 Environment, health, safety and security Environment, health, safety and security118,763118,763 Program direction62,23562,235 Total, Environment, Health, safety and security180,998180,998 Independent enterprise assessments Independent enterprise assessments24,06824,068 Program direction49,46649,466 Total, Independent enterprise assessments73,53473,534 Office of Legacy Management Legacy management158,639158,639 Program direction13,34113,341 Total, Office of Legacy Management171,980171,980 Defense-related activities Defense related administrative support Chief financial officer46,87746,877 Chief information officer71,95971,959 Total, Defense related administrative support118,836118,836 Office of hearings and appeals5,5005,500 Subtotal, Other defense activities753,000758,300 Total, Other Defense Activities753,000758,300 Amend the title so as to read: A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2015 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.. May 13, 2014 Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed