Skip to contentSkip to Braille Studio

Library / Laws / 113th / hr / H.R. 3286 / Introduced in House

H.R. 3286 — Introduced in House

342 words · about 2 min to read

Download .txt All versions Braille ⠃⠗⠋ Print Cite

I 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3286 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 11, 2013Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Cook, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Smith of Missouri, and Mr. Lamborn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources A BILL To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to reimburse States that use State funds to operate National Parks during the Federal Government shutdown, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Protecting States, Opening National Parks Act. 2. Reimbursement for costs to States to open National Parks to the public (a) In general Not later than 90 days after funds are made available, the Secretary of the Treasury, using funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, receipts, and funds, for the several departments, agencies, corporations, and other organizational units of government for the fiscal year 2014, shall reimburse any State for activities described in subsection (b). (b) Activities eligible for reimbursement The Secretary of the Treasury shall reimburse States under subsection (a) for State funds expended for activities that meet all of the following criteria: (1) The activity was conducted in fiscal year 2014 during a time when the Federal Government was not conducting that activity due to the partial shutdown of the Federal Government. (2) The activity was necessary to operate and open to the public a National Park located, in whole or in part, within the State. (3) The activity was authorized under Federal law. (4) The activity was conducted in a manner and at a level not substantially greater in scope or cost than how the activity would have been conducted by the Federal Government. (5) The activity is not a settlement of or defense against a claim of liability on the part of the State.