H.R. 1960 — Placed on Calendar (Senate)

II Calendar No. 126 113th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1960 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES July 8, 2013 Received; read twice and placed on the calendar AN ACT To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 1. Short title This Act may be cited as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents (a) Divisions This Act is organized into five divisions as follows: (1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. (2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. (3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. (4) Division D—Funding Tables. (5) Division E—Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act. (b) Table of contents The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. Division A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS Title I—Procurement Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Army Programs Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program. Subtitle C—Navy Programs Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program. Sec. 122. Cost limitation for CVN–78 aircraft carriers. Subtitle D—Air Force Programs Sec. 131. Multiyear procurement authority for multiple variants of the C–130J aircraft program. Sec. 132. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. Sec. 133. Retirement of KC–135R aircraft. Sec. 134. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. Subtitle E—Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters Sec. 141. Multiyear procurement authority for ground-based interceptors. Sec. 142. Multiyear procurement authority for tactical wheeled vehicles. Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems. Sec. 144. Personal protection equipment procurement. Sec. 145. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements. Sec. 146. Study on procurement of personal protection equipment. Title II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 211. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase. Sec. 212. Limitation on Milestone A activities for Unmanned Carrier-launched Surveillance and Strike system program. Sec. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation. Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of the Air Force. Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition program. Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for the program manager for biometrics of the Department of Defense. Sec. 217. Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement. Sec. 218. Long-range standoff weapon requirement. Sec. 219. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft. Sec. 220. Evaluation and assessment of the Distributed Common Ground System. Sec. 221. Requirement to complete individual carbine testing. Sec. 222. Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for Navy laser weapon system. Sec. 223. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program. Sec. 224. Sense of congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile project. Sec. 225. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared systems space program. Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs Sec. 231. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program. Sec. 232. Additional missile defense site in the United States for optimized protection of the homeland. Sec. 233. Limitation on removal of missile defense equipment from East Asia. Sec. 234. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system. Sec. 235. Analysis of alternatives for successor to precision tracking space system. Sec. 236. Plan to improve organic kill assessment capability of the ground-based midcourse defense system. Sec. 237. Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. Sec. 238. NATO and the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. Sec. 239. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle. Sec. 240. Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative. Sec. 241. Readiness of intercontinental ballistic missile force. Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of the United States. Subtitle D—Reports Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. Sec. 252. Report on strategy to improve body armor. Sec. 253. Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency initiative. Sec. 254. Report on powered rail system. Sec. 255. Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship program. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 261. Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board. Sec. 262. Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research. Sec. 263. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. Sec. 264. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements. Sec. 265. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. Sec. 266. Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university affiliated research centers. Sec. 267. Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and evaluation land. Sec. 268. Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors. Title III—Operation and Maintenance Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. Sec. 302. Authorization of appropriations for Marine Security Guard. Sec. 303. Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force. Subtitle B—Energy and Environment Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy. Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities. Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act. Sec. 314. Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to Department of Defense readiness activities. Sec. 315. Exclusions from definition of chemical substance under Toxic Substances Control Act. Sec. 316. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement. Sec. 317. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits. Sec. 318. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries. Sec. 319. Limitation on procurement of biofuels. Sec. 320. Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation. Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment Sec. 321. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan. Sec. 322. Review of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army arsenals. Sec. 323. Inclusion of Army arsenals capabilities in solicitations. Sec. 324. Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of certain functions to contractor performance. Subtitle D—Reports Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness. Sec. 332. Repeal of annual Comptroller General report on Army progress. Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets. Sec. 334. Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico. Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority Sec. 341. Limitation on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores. Sec. 342. Prohibition on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration teams outside the United States. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 351. Requirement to establish policy on joint combat uniforms. Title IV—Military Personnel Authorizations Subtitle A—Active Forces Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. Sec. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels. Subtitle B—Reserve Forces Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support. Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 421. Military personnel. Title V—Military Personnel Policy Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally Sec. 501. Limitations on number of general and flag officers on active duty. Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management Sec. 511. Minimum notification requirements for members of reserve components before deployment or cancellation of deployment related to a contingency operation. Sec. 512. Information to be provided to boards considering officers for selective early removal from reserve active-status list. Sec. 513. Temporary authority to maintain active status and inactive status lists of members in the inactive National Guard. Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general and flag officers in an active status. Sec. 515. Feasability study on establishing a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Sec. 516. Designation of State student cadet corps as Department of Defense youth organizations. Subtitle C—General Service Authorities Sec. 521. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System. Sec. 522. Compliance requirements for organizational climate assessments. Sec. 523. Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside the United States. Sec. 524. Contents of Transition Assistance Program. Sec. 525. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records. Sec. 526. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators. Sec. 527. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions. Sec. 528. Applicability of medical examination requirement regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury to proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sec. 529. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to close a prayer outside of a religious service according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. Sec. 530. Expansion and implementation of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members. Sec. 530A. Servicemembers’ Accountability, Rights, and Responsibilities Training. Sec. 530B. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of sexual assault. Sec. 530C. Report on data and information collected in connection with Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 530D. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan. Sec. 530E. Meetings with respect to religious liberty. Sec. 530F. Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Sec. 530G. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools. Sec. 530H. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the Armed Forces. Subtitle D—Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Sec. 531. Limitations on convening authority discretion regarding court-martial findings and sentence. Sec. 532. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes. Sec. 533. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of offenses by general courts-martial. Sec. 534. Regulations regarding consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victims of sexual assault. Sec. 535. Consideration of need for, and authority to provide for, temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. Sec. 536. Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses and related provisions. Sec. 537. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault. Sec. 538. Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice process. Sec. 539. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of sex-related offenses. Sec. 540. Uniform training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program. Sec. 541. Development of selection criteria for assignment as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent. Sec. 542. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sec. 543. Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. Sec. 544. Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of courts-martial process. Sec. 545. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed Forces. Sec. 546. Amendment to Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate considerations relating to character and military service of accused in initial disposition of sex-related offenses. Sec. 547. Inclusion of letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of reprimands and counseling statements. Sec. 548. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training. Sec. 549. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases. Sec. 550. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases. Sec. 550A. Discharge or dismissal, and confinement required for certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 550B. Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources. Sec. 550C. Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel. Sec. 550D. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies. Sec. 550E. Ensuring awareness of policy to instruct victims of sexual assault seeking security clearance to answer no to question 21. Sec. 550F. Report on policies and regulations regarding service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV. Sec. 550G. Additional modification of annual Department of Defense reporting requirements regarding sexual assaults and prevention and response program. Subtitle E—Military Family Readiness Sec. 551. Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones. Sec. 552. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 553. Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing. Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. Sec. 555. Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from military to civilian life. Sec. 556. Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Sec. 557. Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones. Subtitle F—Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness Sec. 561. Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program. Sec. 562.  Improved climate assessments and dissemination and tracking of results. Sec. 563. Service-wide 360 assessments. Sec. 564. Health welfare inspections. Sec. 565. Review of security of military installations, including barracks and multi-family residences. Sec. 566. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses. Sec. 567. Use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses. Sec. 568. Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 569. Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps serving in combat zones. Sec. 570. Report on the Troops to Teachers program. Sec. 570A. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members of the Armed Forces. Subtitle G—Defense Dependents’ Education Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees. Sec. 572. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students. Sec. 573. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program. Subtitle H—Decorations and Awards Sec. 581. Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or medals. Sec. 582. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces. Sec. 583. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal. Sec. 584. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements. Sec. 585. Treatment of victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas. Sec. 586. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge. Sec. 587. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. Sec. 588. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor during the Korean War. Sec. 589. Required gold content for Medal of Honor. Sec. 590. Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations. Sec. 590A. Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht. Sec. 590B. Replacement of military decorations. Sec. 590C. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. Subtitle I—Other Matters Sec. 591. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College. Sec. 592. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military Cemeteries. Sec. 593. Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues. Sec. 594. Commission on Service to the Nation. Sec. 595. Electronic tracking of certain reserve duty. Sec. 596. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans. Sec. 597. Provision of service records. Sec. 598. Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica. Sec. 599. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units. Title VI—Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay. Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces. Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals. Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. Subtitle C—Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional Benefits Sec. 621. Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents of certain members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Sec. 622. Prevention of retired pay inversion for members whose retired pay is computed using high-three average. Subtitle D—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations Sec. 631. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals. Sec. 632. Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems. Sec. 633. Correction of obsolete references to certain nonappropriated fund instrumentalities. Sec. 634. Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. Subtitle E—Other Matters Sec. 641. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human remains retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation. Sec. 642. Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the reserve components as veterans. Sec. 643. Survey of military pay and benefits preferences. Sec. 644. Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total. Title VII—Health Care Provisions Subtitle A—Improvements to Health Benefits Sec. 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 702. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces. Sec. 703. Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under TRICARE. Sec. 704. Extension of Transitional Assistance Management Program. Sec. 705. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of service members with urotrauma. Subtitle B—Health Care Administration Sec. 711. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime. Sec. 712. Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities. Sec. 713. Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health record program. Sec. 714. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the reserve components. Sec. 722. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities. Sec. 723. Mental health support for military personnel and families. Sec. 724. Research regarding hydrocephalus. Sec. 725. Traumatic brain injury research. Sec. 726. Data sharing with State adjutant generals to facilitate suicide prevention efforts. Sec. 727. Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast cancer. Sec. 728. Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the Armed Forces and their families. Sec. 729. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in Department of Defense centers of excellence. Sec. 730. Preliminary mental health assessments. Sec. 731. Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan. Sec. 732. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. Sec. 733. Pilot program for investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. Sec. 734. Integrated Electronic Health Record of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs. Sec. 735. Comptroller General report on recovery audit program for TRICARE. Title VIII—Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management Sec. 801. Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense business system acquisition programs when initial operating capability is not achieved within five years of Milestone A approval. Sec. 802. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories. Sec. 803. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services. Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations Sec. 811. Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. Sec. 812. Amendments relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. Sec. 813. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation. Sec. 814. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports. Sec. 815.  Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment. Sec. 816. Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts. Sec. 817. Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources. Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan Sec. 821. Amendments relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy. Sec. 822. Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Subtitle D—Other Matters Sec. 831. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. Sec. 833. Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities. Sec. 834. Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses. Sec. 835. Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of sole-source defense contracts. Sec. 836. Improved management of Defense equipment and supplies through automated information and data capture technologies. Sec. 837. Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to take into account sourcing laws. Sec. 838. Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in United States. Sec. 839. Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces. Title IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management Sec. 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Sec. 902. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise architecture. Sec. 903. Report on strategic importance of United States military installation of the U.S. Pacific Command. Sec. 904. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented United States military installations. Subtitle B—Space Activities Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy. Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection. Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy. Sec. 914. Space control mission report. Sec. 915. Responsive launch. Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities. Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service. Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical data link systems. Sec. 932. Defense Science Board assessment of United States Cyber Command. Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense. Sec. 934. Notification of investigations related to compromise of critical program information. Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense. Sec. 936. Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity activities with China. Sec. 937. Small business cybersecurity solutions office. Sec. 938. Small business cyber education. Subtitle E—Total Force Management Sec. 941. Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of Government oversight of functions closely associated with inherently Governmental functions. Sec. 942. Five-year requirement for certification of appropriate manpower performance. Title X—General Provisions Subtitle A—Financial Matters Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements. Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization. Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. Sec. 1013. Two-year extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. Sec. 1014. Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program. Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards Sec. 1021. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost to the navy. Sec. 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships. Sec. 1023. Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards. Sec. 1024. Sense of Congress regarding a balanced future naval force. Sec. 1025. Authority for short-term extension or renewal of leases for vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program. Sec. 1026. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships. Sec. 1027. Sense of Congress on establishment of an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health. Subtitle D—Counterterrorism Sec. 1030. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions. Sec. 1031. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement. Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1033. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities. Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1035. Unclassified summary of information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan. Sec. 1036. Assessment of affiliates and adherents of al-Qaeda outside the United States. Sec. 1037. Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Sec. 1038. Rank of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo. Sec. 1039. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen. Sec. 1040. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States. Sec. 1040A. Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups. Sec. 1040B. Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force. Sec. 1040C. Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo. Sec. 1040D. Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen. Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. Sec. 1042. Report on process for determining targets of lethal operations. Sec. 1043. Counterterrorism operational briefings. Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces Sec. 1051. Prohibition on elimination of the nuclear triad. Sec. 1052. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction of nuclear forces. Sec. 1053. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe. Sec. 1054. Statement of policy on implementation of any agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the New START Treaty; limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic delivery systems. Sec. 1055. Sense of congress on compliance with nuclear arms control agreements. Sec. 1056. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. Sec. 1057. Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1058. Cost estimates for nuclear weapons. Sec. 1059. Report on New START Treaty. Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations Sec. 1061. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze captured records. Sec. 1062. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate. Sec. 1063. Limitation on availability of funds for modification of force structure of the Army. Sec. 1064. Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities. Sec. 1065. Unmanned aircraft joint training and usage plan. Subtitle H—Studies and Reports Sec. 1071. Oversight of combat support agencies. Sec. 1072. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology. Sec. 1073. Extension of deadline for Comptroller General report on assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense. Sec. 1074. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies. Sec. 1075. Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 quadrennial defense review. Sec. 1076. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and United States Special Operations Command. Sec. 1077. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems. Sec. 1078. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress. Sec. 1079. Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation plan information to Congress. Sec. 1080. Report on United States citizens subject to military detention. Sec. 1080A. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report. Sec. 1080B. Report on long-term costs of operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. Subtitle I—Other Matters Sec. 1081. Technical and clerical amendments. Sec. 1082. Transportation of supplies for the United States by aircraft operated by United States air carriers. Sec. 1082A. Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from nonprofit organizations. Sec. 1083. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs. Sec. 1084. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance. Sec. 1085. Revision of compensation of members of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force. Sec. 1086. Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems. Sec. 1087. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities. Sec. 1088. Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing standards. Sec. 1089. Determination and Disclosure of Transportation Costs Incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States. Sec. 1090. Transfer or loan of equipment to the Department of Homeland Security relating to border security. Sec. 1091. Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered Aerostat Radar System. Sec. 1092. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities. Sec. 1093. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace. Sec. 1094. Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain Federal property. Sec. 1095. Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices. Sec. 1096. Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and military reserve force. Sec. 1097. Access of employees of congressional support offices to department of defense facilities. Sec. 1098. Cost of wars. Sec. 1099. Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and cultures in the building of partner capacity. Sec. 1099A. Sense of Congress regarding preservation of Second Amendment rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in the District of Columbia. Title XI—Civilian Personnel Matters Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas. Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of Department of Defense. Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees. Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program. Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel. Sec. 1107. Defense Science Initiative for Personnel. Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel. Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the armed forces. Title XII—Matters relating to foreign nations Subtitle A—Assistance and training Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces. Sec. 1202. Three-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. Sec. 1203. Global Security Contingency Fund. Sec. 1204. Codification of National Guard State Partnership Program. Sec. 1205. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of certain foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region. Sec. 1206. One-year extension of authority to support foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord's Resistance Army. Sec. 1207. Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense. Subtitle B—Matters relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan Sec. 1211. One-year extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations. Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan. Sec. 1213. Extension of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. Sec. 1214. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. Sec. 1216. Special immigrant visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies. Sec. 1217. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. Sec. 1218. Improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program. Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program. Sec. 1220. Sense of congress. Subtitle C—Matters relating to Afghanistan post 2014 Sec. 1221. Modification of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan. Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of United States combat and military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan. Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan. Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan. Sec. 1225. Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or bases in Afghanistan. Subtitle D—Matters relating to Iran Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran. Sec. 1233. Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf. Sec. 1234. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in Southwest Asia. Sec. 1235. Statement of Policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority. Subtitle E—Reports and other matters Sec. 1241. Report on posture and readiness of United States Armed Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and the Middle East. Sec. 1242. Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security. Sec. 1243. Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula. Sec. 1244. Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia. Sec. 1245. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. Sec. 1246. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act. Sec. 1248. Limitation on funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to certain missile defense technology. Sec. 1249. Reports on actions to reduce support of ballistic missile programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea. Sec. 1250. Congressional notifications relating to status of forces agreements. Sec. 1251. Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria. Sec. 1252. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations and related NATO agreements. Sec. 1253. Limitation on funds to implement executive agreements relating to United States missile defense capabilities. Sec. 1254. Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. Sec. 1255. Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the United States and Burma. Sec. 1256. Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe. Sec. 1257. Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s Republic of China. Sec. 1258. Rule of construction. Sec. 1259. Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan. Sec. 1260. Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah. Sec. 1261. Combating crime through intelligence capabilities. Sec. 1262. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty. Sec. 1263. War Powers of Congress. Sec. 1264. Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens. Sec. 1265. Sale of F–16 aircraft to Taiwan. Sec. 1266. Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to self-defense. Sec. 1267. Report on collective and national security implications of central Asian and South Caucasus energy development. Sec. 1268. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation. Sec. 1269. Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control items. Sec. 1270. Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military. Sec. 1271. Israel’s right to self-defense. Sec. 1272. Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation. Sec. 1273. Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran and North Korea. Sec. 1274. Limitation on use of funds to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport. Title XIII—Cooperative Threat Reduction Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. Sec. 1303. Extension for use of contributions to the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region. Title XIV—Other Authorizations Subtitle A—Military Programs Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. Sec. 1402. National defense sealift fund. Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. Sec. 1404. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide. Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and critical materials supply. Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile. Subtitle C—Other Matters Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses. Title XV—Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations Sec. 1501. Purpose. Sec. 1502. Procurement. Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 1505. Military personnel. Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. Subtitle B—Financial Matters Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. Subtitle C—Limitations and Other Matters Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. Sec. 1532. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. Sec. 1533. Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass. Sec. 1534. Report on United States force levels and costs of military operations in Afghanistan. Sec. 1535. Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment. Title XVI—Industrial Base Matters Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense. Sec. 1602. Expansion of the procurement technical assistance program to advance small business growth. Sec. 1603. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. Sec. 1604. Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat. Sec. 1605. Foreign commercial satellite services. Sec. 1606. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program. Sec. 1607. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns. Sec. 1608. Program to provide Federal contracts to early stage small businesses. Sec. 1609. Credit for certain subcontractors. Sec. 1610. GAO Study on subcontracting reporting systems. Sec. 1611. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts. Division B—Military Construction Authorizations Sec. 2001. Short title. Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. Sec. 2003. Effective date. Title XXI—Army Military Construction Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2102. Family housing. Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. Sec. 2104. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. Sec. 2109. Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill, Dahlonega, Georgia. Title XXII—Navy Military Construction Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2202. Family housing. Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. Sec. 2205. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project. Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. Sec. 2207. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. Title XXIII—Air Force Military Construction Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2302. Family housing. Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. Sec. 2306. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project. Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. Title XXIV—Defense Agencies Military Construction Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide. Title XXV—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. Title XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. Subtitle B—Other Matters Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. Title XXVII—Base Realignment and Closure Activities Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. Subtitle B—Other Matters Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability of military health care in National Capital Region. Sec. 2713. Consideration of the value of services provided by a local community to the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis in making base realignment or closure decisions. Title XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes Sec. 2801. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction. Sec. 2802. Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns and floor areas for military family housing and submission of net floor area information. Sec. 2803. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing. Sec. 2804. Military construction standards to reduce vulnerability of structures to terrorist attack. Sec. 2805. Treatment of payments received for providing utilities and services in connection with use of alternative authority for acquisition and improvement of military housing. Sec. 2806. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority. Sec. 2807. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization projects. Sec. 2807A. Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization Initiative. Sec. 2808. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States. Sec. 2809. Development of master plans for major military installations. Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration Sec. 2811. Codification of policies and requirements regarding closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries. Sec. 2812. Report on utilization of Department of Defense real property. Sec. 2813. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. Subtitle C—Energy Security Sec. 2821. Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum certification. Subtitle D—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment Sec. 2831.  Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. Sec. 2832. Repeal of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region. Subtitle E—Land Conveyances Sec. 2841. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California. Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Sec. 2844. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. Sec. 2845. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch Mountains, Utah. Sec. 2846. Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia. Sec. 2847. Land conveyance, Mifflin County United States Army Reserve Center, Lewistown, Pennsylvania. Subtitle F—Other Matters Sec. 2861. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement. Sec. 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. Sec. 2863. Redesignation of the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences as the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing. Sec. 2864. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio. Sec. 2865. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in Riverside, California. Sec. 2866. Establishment of military divers memorial at Washington Navy Yard. Sec. 2867. Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials. Title XXIX—Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project. Title XXX—Military Land Transfers and Withdrawals to Support Readiness and Security Subtitle A—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana Sec. 3001. Withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana. Sec. 3002. Management of withdrawn and reserved lands. Sec. 3003. Special rules governing minerals management. Sec. 3004. Grazing. Sec. 3005. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. Sec. 3006. Payments in lieu of taxes. Sec. 3007. Hunting, fishing and trapping. Sec. 3008. Water rights. Sec. 3009. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression. Sec. 3010. On-going decontamination. Sec. 3011. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation. Sec. 3012. Limitation on subsequent availability of lands for appropriation. Sec. 3013. Relinquishment. Subtitle B—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico Sec. 3021. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Sec. 3022. Water rights. Sec. 3023. Withdrawal. Subtitle C—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California Sec. 3031. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California. Sec. 3032. Water rights. Sec. 3033. Withdrawal. Subtitle D—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California Sec. 3041. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California. Sec. 3042. Management and use of transferred land. Sec. 3043. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title. Sec. 3044. Effect of termination of military use. Sec. 3045. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period. Sec. 3046. Water rights. Subtitle E—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California Sec. 3051. Designation of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. Sec. 3052. Limited biannual Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms use of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. Sec. 3053. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California. Sec. 3054. Water rights. Subtitle F—Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada Sec. 3061. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada. Sec. 3062. Water rights. Sec. 3063. Withdrawal. Division C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Title XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. Sec. 3104. Energy security and assurance. Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3112. Termination of Department of Energy employees to protect national security. Sec. 3113. Modification of independent cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear facilities. Sec. 3114. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Sec. 3115. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. Sec. 3116. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration. Sec. 3117. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator. Sec. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Global Threat Reduction Initiative. Sec. 3119. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response. Sec. 3120. Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts. Sec. 3121. W88–1 warhead and W78–1 warhead life extension options. Sec. 3122. Extension of principles of pilot program to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. Sec. 3123. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects. Subtitle C—Reports Sec. 3131. Annual report and certification on status of the security of the nuclear security enterprise. Sec. 3132. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear weapons stockpile. Sec. 3133. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. Subtitle D—Other matters Sec. 3141. Congressional advisory panel on the governance of the nuclear security enterprise. Sec. 3142. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. Sec. 3143. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Sec. 3145. Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension. Sec. 3146. Conveyance of land at the Hanford Site. Sec. 3147. Manhattan Project National Historical Park. Title XXXII—Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Sec. 3201. Authorization. Sec. 3202. Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Title XXXIV—Naval Petroleum Reserves Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. Title XXXV—Maritime Administration Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014. Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program. Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress. Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska. Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports. Division D—Funding Tables Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. Title XLI—PROCUREMENT Sec. 4101. Procurement. Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. Title XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. Title XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. Title XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL Sec. 4401. Military personnel. Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. Title XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. Title XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Sec. 4601. Military construction. Title XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. Division E—Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act Sec. 5001. Short title. Sec. 5002. Table of contents. Sec. 5003. Definitions. Title LI—Management of Information Technology Within Federal Government Sec. 5101. Increased authority of agency Chief Information Officers over information technology. Sec. 5102. Lead coordination role of Chief Information Officers Council. Sec. 5103. Reports by Government Accountability Office. Title LII—Data Center Optimization Sec. 5201. Purpose. Sec. 5202. Definitions. Sec. 5203. Federal data center optimization initiative. Sec. 5204. Performance requirements related to data center consolidation. Sec. 5205. Cost savings related to data center optimization. Sec. 5206. Reporting requirements to Congress and the Federal Chief Information Officer. Title LIII—Elimination of Duplication and Waste in Information Technology Acquisition Sec. 5301. Inventory of information technology assets. Sec. 5302. Website consolidation and transparency. Sec. 5303. Transition to the cloud. Sec. 5304. Elimination of unnecessary duplication of contracts by requiring business case analysis. Title LIV—Strengthening and Streamlining Information Technology Acquisition Management Practices Subtitle A—Strengthening and Streamlining IT Program Management Practices Sec. 5401. Establishment of Federal infrastructure and common application collaboration center. Sec. 5402. Designation of Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence. Subtitle B—Strengthening IT Acquisition Workforce Sec. 5411. Expansion of training and use of information technology acquisition cadres. Sec. 5412. Plan on strengthening program and project management performance. Sec. 5413. Personnel awards for excellence in the acquisition of information systems and information technology. Title LV—Additional Reforms Sec. 5501. Maximizing the benefit of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative. Sec. 5502. Promoting transparency of blanket purchase agreements. Sec. 5503. Additional source selection technique in solicitations. Sec. 5504. Enhanced transparency in information technology investments. Sec. 5505. Enhanced communication between Government and industry. Sec. 5506. Clarification of current law with respect to technology neutrality in acquisition of software. 3. Congressional defense committees In this Act, the term congressional defense committees has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS I Procurement A Authorization of Appropriations 101. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. B Army Programs 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits the report under subsection (b). (b) Report required The Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory located in Auburn, Washington, cited in the report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (number 2013–025) dated November 30, 2012. The report submitted under this subsection shall include the following: (1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary of the recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the report by the Inspector General. (2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that may still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles. (3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse that are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or reset of Stryker vehicles. (4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining the inventory of parts no longer usable by the Secretary. (5) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. C Navy Programs 121. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program (a) Authority for multiyear procurement Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into— (1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E–2D aircraft; and (2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract entered into under paragraph (1). (b) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 122. Cost limitation for CVN–78 aircraft carriers (a) In general Section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) is amended to read as follows: 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers (a) Limitation (1) Lead ship The total amount obligated from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78 may not exceed $12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)). (2) Follow-on ships The total amount obligated from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for the construction of any ship that is constructed in the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers after the lead ship of that class may not exceed $11,411,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)). (b) Adjustment of limitation amount The Secretary of the Navy may adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for any ship constructed in the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers by the following: (1) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to economic inflation after September 30, 2013. (2) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs attributable to compliance with changes in Federal, State, or local laws. (3) The amounts of outfitting costs and post-delivery costs incurred for that ship. (4) The amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to insertion of new technology into that ship, as compared to the technology baseline as it was defined in the approved acquisition program baseline estimate of December 2005. (5) The amounts of increases or decreases to nonrecurring design and engineering cost attributable to achieving compliance with the cost limitation. (6) The amounts of increases or decreases to cost required to correct deficiencies that may affect the safety of the ship and personnel or otherwise preclude the ship from safe operations and crew certification. (7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship that are attributable to the shipboard test program. (c) Limitation on technology insertion cost adjustment The Secretary of the Navy may use the authority under paragraph (4) of subsection (b) to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a) for a ship referred to in that subsection with respect to insertion of new technology into that ship only if— (1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology would lower the life-cycle cost of the ship; or (2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that insertion of the new technology is required to meet an emerging threat and the Secretary of Defense certifies to those committees that such threat poses grave harm to national security. (d) Notice (1) Requirement The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees each year, at the same time that the budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for the next fiscal year, written notice of— (A) any change in the amount set forth in subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year that the Secretary has determined to be associated with a cost referred to in subsection (b); and (B) the most accurate estimate possible of the Secretary with respect to the total cost compared to the amount set forth in subsection (a), as adjusted by subsection (b), and the steps the Secretary is taking to reduce the costs below such amount. (2) Effective date The requirement in paragraph (1) shall become effective with the budget request for the year of procurement of the first ship referred to in subsection (a). . (b) Conforming amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 122 and inserting the following: Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers. . D Air Force Programs 131. Multiyear procurement authority for multiple variants of the C–130J aircraft program (a) Authority for multiyear procurement Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into— (1) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of multiple variants of C–130J aircraft for the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Air Force; and (2) one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of mission equipment with respect to aircraft procured under a contract entered into under paragraph (1). (b) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 132. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft (a) Prohibition The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft. (b) Conforming repeal Section 143 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1662) is repealed. 133. Retirement of KC–135R aircraft (a) Treatment of retired KC–135R aircraft Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain each KC–135R aircraft that is retired by the Secretary in a condition that would allow recall of that aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force structure. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to a KC–135R aircraft that the Secretary transfers or sells to allies or partner nations of the United States. (c) Delivery of KC–46A aircraft For each KC–46A aircraft that is delivered to the Air Force and the Commander of the Air Mobility Command initially certifies as mission capable, the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a) with respect to one retired KC–135R aircraft. (d) Conforming repeal Section 135 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114) is repealed. 134. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The new acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program of the Air Force will maintain mission assurance, reduce costs, and provide opportunities for competition for certified launch providers. (2) The method in which the current and potential future certified launch providers will be evaluated in a competition is still under development. (b) Plan (1) In general The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop and implement a plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors in awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch vehicle provider. (2) Comparison The plan under paragraph (1) shall include a description of how the following areas will be addressed in the evaluation: (A) The proposed cost, schedule, and performance. (B) Mission assurance activities. (C) The manner in which the contractor will operate under the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (D) The effect of other contracts in which the contractor is entered into with the Federal Government, such as the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability contract and the space station commercial resupply services contracts. (E) Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate. (c) Submission to Congress (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall— (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the plan under subsection (b)(1); or (B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan. (2) GAO review The Comptroller General of the United States shall— (A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a review of the plan under subsection (b)(1); or (B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan. (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (A) The congressional defense committees. (B) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (C) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. E Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 141. Multiyear procurement authority for ground-based interceptors (a) Authority for multiyear procurement Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of 14 ground-based interceptors. (b) Authority for advance procurement The Director may enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement associated with the ground-based interceptors for which authorization to enter into a multiyear procurement contract is provided under subsection (a). (c) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 142. Multiyear procurement authority for tactical wheeled vehicles (a) Authority for multiyear procurement Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more multiyear, multivehicle contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of core tactical wheeled vehicles. (b) Condition for out-year contract payments A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. (c) Notification required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of— (1) whether the Secretary will enter into a contract under subsection (a); and (2) if not, an explanation for why the Secretary will not enter into such a contract. (d) Annual reports For each fiscal year in which the Secretary is entered into a contract under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, as part of the material submitted in support of the budget of the President for such fiscal year, as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the following: (1) The status of procurements under such contract. (2) A detailed analysis of any cost savings achieved for each class of vehicle procured under such contract. (3) A description of any challenges to the Secretary in carrying out this section or in achieving any such cost savings. (4) Any recommendations for future implementation of a program for multiyear, multi-vehicle procurement. (e) Termination of authority The Secretary may not enter into a contract under this section after September 30, 2018. During the five-year period beginning on October 1, 2018, the Secretary may continue to carry out any contract entered into under this section before such date using funds made available to the Secretary for such purpose before such date. (f) Core tactical vehicles defined In this section, the term core tactical wheeled vehicles means— (1) the family of medium tactical vehicles; (2) medium tactical wheeled vehicle replacements; (3) the family of heavy tactical vehicles; and (4) logistics vehicle system replacements. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage an RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system. (b) Maintained levels During the period preceding December 31, 2016, in supporting the operational requirements of the combatant commands, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain the operational capability of each RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft system belonging to the Air Force or delivered to the Air Force during such period. (c) Conforming amendment Section 154 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1666) is amended— (1) by striking (a) Limitation.—; and (2) by striking subsection (b). 144. Personal protection equipment procurement (a) Procurement The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that personal protection equipment is procured using funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 and available for such purpose as specified in the funding table in sections 4101 and 4102. (b) Procurement line item In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2015, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall ensure that within each military department procurement account, a separate, dedicated procurement line item is designated for personal protection equipment. (c) Personal protection equipment defined In this section, the term personal protection equipment means the following: (1) Body armor components. (2) Combat helmets. (3) Combat protective eyewear. (4) Protective clothing. (5) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary. 145. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4157) is amended— (1) by striking subsection (b); and (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 146. Study on procurement of personal protection equipment (a) Study (1) In general Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to identify and assess alternative and effective means for stimulating competition and innovation in the personal protection equipment industrial base. (2) Submission Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center conducting the study under paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary the study, including any findings and recommendations. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (a)(1). (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The study, findings, and recommendations submitted to the Secretary under subsection (a)(2). (B) An assessment of current and future technologies that could markedly improve body armor, including by decreasing weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant improvements. (C) An analysis of the capability of the personal protection equipment industrial base to leverage such technologies to produce the next generation body armor. (D) An assessment of alternative body armor acquisition models, including different types of contracting and budgeting practices of the Department of Defense. (c) Personal protection equipment In this section, the term personal protection equipment includes body armor. II RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION A Authorization of Appropriations 201. Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201. B Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 211. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army may be obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: (1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone B documentation for the ground combat vehicle that— (A) is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, or other similar official; and (B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient business case to proceed with the engineering and manufacturing development phase for the ground combat vehicle using only one contractor. (2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat vehicle program has— (A) feasible and fully-defined requirements; (B) fully mature technologies; (C) independent and high-confidence cost estimates; (D) available funding; and (E) a realistic and achievable schedule. 212. Limitation on Milestone A activities for Unmanned Carrier-launched Surveillance and Strike system program The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics may not award a Milestone A technology development contract with respect to the Unmanned Carrier-launched Surveillance and Strike system program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the software and system engineering designs for the control system and connectivity and aircraft carrier segments of such program can achieve, with low level of integration risk, successful compatibility and interoperability with the air vehicle segment selected for contract award with respect to such program. 213. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for logistics information technology, including for the expeditionary combat support system, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will modernize and update the logistics information technology systems of the Air Force following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat support system. Such report shall include— (1) strategies to— (A) in the near term, address any gaps in capability with respect to logistics information technology; and (B) during the period covered by the current future-years defense plan, provide for long-term modernization of logistics information technology; (2) an analysis of the root causes leading to the failure of the expeditionary combat support system program; and (3) a plan of action by the Secretary to ensure that the lessons learned under such analysis are— (A) shared throughout the Department of Defense and the military departments; and (B) considered in program planning for similar logistics information technology systems. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of the Air Force (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for Defensive Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 0202088F), not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of how the Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence is used to support the software assurance activities of the Air Force and other elements of the Department of Defense, including pursuant to section 933 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note). (2) A description of the resources used to support the Center of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through fiscal year 2014. (3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center of Excellence during the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title 10, United States Code. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition program Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended for the precision extended range munition program until the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics submits to the congressional defense committees written certification that— (1) such program is necessary to meet a valid operational need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided mortar munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or aerial-delivered joint fires; and (2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with development and production of such program. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for the program manager for biometrics of the Department of Defense (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics for future biometric architectures or systems, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the future program structure for biometrics oversight and execution and architectural requirements for biometrics enabling capability. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager for biometrics, and the Biometrics Identity Management Agency, including an analysis of alternatives to evaluate— (A) how to better align responsibilities for the multiple elements of the military departments and the Department of Defense with responsibility for biometrics, including the Navy and the Marine Corps; the Office of the Provost Marshall General, and the intelligence community; and (B) whether the program management responsibilities of the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics should be retained by the Army or transferred to another military department or element of the Department based on the expected future operating environment. (2) An assessment of the current requirements for the biometrics enabling capability to ensure the capability continues to meet the needs of the relevant military departments and elements of the Department of Defense based on the future operating environment after the drawdown in Afghanistan. (3) An analysis of the need to merge the program management structures and systems architecture and requirements development process for biometrics and forensics applications. 217. Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement Not later than October 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall demonstrate, with respect to the X–47B unmanned combat air system aircraft, the following: (1) Unmanned autonomous rendezvous and aerial-refueling operations using the receptacle and probe equipment of the X–47B aircraft. (2) The ability of such aircraft to on-load fuel from airborne tanker aircraft using both the boom and drogue equipment installed on the tanker aircraft. 218. Long-range standoff weapon requirement The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop a follow-on air-launched cruise missile to the AGM–86 that— (1) achieves initial operating capability for both conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030; and (2) is certified for internal carriage and employment for both conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation long-range strike bomber by not later than 2034. 219. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft (a) Review The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of software for the F–35 aircraft program (in this section referred to as the software development program), including by reviewing the progress made in— (1) managing the software development program; and (2) delivering critical software capability in accordance with current program milestones. (b) Report Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following: (1) An assessment by the independent team with respect to whether the software development program— (A) has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates occurring before the date of the report; and (B) will be successful in meeting the established program schedule. (2) Any recommendations of the independent team with respect to improving the software development program to ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational testing, the established program schedule is met on time. (3) If the independent team determines that the software development program will be unable to deliver the full complement of software within the established program schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent team considers appropriate to deliver such software within such schedule. 220. Evaluation and assessment of the Distributed Common Ground System (a) Project codes for budget submissions In the budget transmitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, each capability component within the distributed common ground system program shall be set forth as a separate project code within the program element line, and each covered official shall submit supporting justification for the project code within the program element descriptive summary. (b) Analysis (1) Requirement The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an analysis of commercial link analysis tools that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet the requirements of the distributed common ground system program. (2) Elements The analysis required under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground system program requirements for link analysis tools based on current program needs, recent operational experience, and the requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles. (B) Market research of current commercially available link analysis tools to determine which tools, if any, could potentially satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A). (C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any commercially available link analysis tools identified in subparagraph (B). (3) Submission Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the results of the analysis conducted under paragraph (1). (c) Competition required (1) In general Except as provided by paragraph (3), if the Under Secretary identifies one or more commercial link analysis tools under subsection (b) (other than such tools offered by the current technology provider) that meet the requirements for the distributed common ground system program, including the requirement for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles, each covered official shall initiate a request for proposals for such link analysis tools by not later than 180 days after the Under Secretary makes such identification. Such a request for proposals shall be based on market research and competitive procedures in accordance with applicable law and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. (2) Notification Each covered official shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of any request for proposals issued under paragraph (1) by not later than 30 days after such request is issued. (3) Waiver of RFP timeline If a covered official determines that issuing a request for proposals by the date specified in paragraph (1) would not be aligned with the acquisition or developmental milestones of the distributed common ground station program, the covered official may waive the requirement to issue such a request for proposals by such date if the covered official submits to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such waiver that includes— (A) the reasons for making such a waiver; and (B) identification of when in the acquisition timeline of such program that the covered official plans to issue the request for proposals. (d) Covered official defined In this section, the term covered official means the following: (1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army. (2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters concerning the Navy. (3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force. (4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to matters concerning the Marine Corps. (5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States Special Operations Command. 221. Requirement to complete individual carbine testing The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual carbine program unless the Secretary— (1) completes the Phase III down-select and user-evaluation phase of the individual carbine competitors; (2) conducts the required comprehensive business case analysis of such program; and (3) submits to the congressional defense committees— (A) the results of the down-select and user evaluation described in paragraph (1); and (B) the business case analysis described in paragraph (2). 222. Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for Navy laser weapon system (a) In general The Secretary shall ensure that each future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, that covers any of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 includes a funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon system with respect to such fiscal years. (b) Alternative report If the Secretary determines that the technology and maturation efforts of a Navy laser weapon system conducted prior to fiscal year 2016 do not indicate that suitable technology warranting a program of record for such system will be available by 2018, the Secretary may waive the requirements of subsection (a) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees written justification of such determination, including a description of the technical shortcomings of such system, by not later than March 30, 2016. 223. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom's Vanguard successor program (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Polaris Sales Agreement of 1963 formally arranged for the Polaris missile system to be purchased by the United Kingdom for its submarines. It was extended in 1982 to include the Trident missile system and this agreement continues to underpin the independent nuclear deterrent of the United Kingdom. (2) April 2013 marked the 50-year anniversary of the agreement. (3) Since the inception of the agreement, the agreement has been a tremendous success and provided great benefits to both nations by creating major cost savings, stronger nuclear deterrence, and a stronger alliance. (4) The Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement of the United States and the Vanguard-class ballistic missile successor of the United Kingdom will share a common missile compartment and the Trident II/D5 strategic weapon system. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure that the common missile compartment associated with the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on schedule and is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of the United Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its longstanding commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based strategic deterrence. 224. Sense of congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile project It is the sense of the Congress that— (1) following the successful joint technology capability demonstration that the counter-electronics high power microwave missile project (in this section referred to as CHAMP) conducted last year, the Air Force should examine the results of the demonstration and consider the demonstration as a potential solution during any analysis of alternatives conducted in 2014; (2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step in the long term-term development of a high power microwave weapon; (3) additionally, a near-term option may be available to get such capability to commanders of the combatant commands should the capability be required; (4) the Secretary of the Air Force should pursue both near- and long-term high power microwave weapon systems; (5) CHAMP could be developed as a cruise missile delivered weapon with target availability to commanders of the combatant commands by 2016; and (6) such development should not prohibit or divert resources from an analysis of alternatives and long-term development of a high power microwave weapon. 225. Limitation on availability of funds for space-based infrared systems space program Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended for the space-based infrared systems space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed until the Executive Agent for Space of the Department of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office in accordance with section 2273a of title 10, United States Code. C Missile Defense Programs 231. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the medium extended air defense system. (b) Harvesting technology (1) Notice and wait The Secretary of Defense may not carry out actions described in paragraph (2) until a period of 120 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of the plans of the Secretary to carry out such actions. (2) Actions described Actions described in this paragraph are actions relating to harvesting technology of the medium extended air defense system. (c) Report (1) In general Not later than February 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the opportunities to harvest technology of the medium extended air defense system to modernize the various air and missile defense systems and integrated architecture of the Army, based on the report required by section 226 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678). (2) Matters included The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) A review of current Army and joint requirements to which any harvested technology of the medium extended air defense system might be applied. (B) The timeline of the Secretary for completion of an analysis of alternatives to technologies and systems being considered for harvesting. (C) An overview of the planned acquisition strategy for any major systems being considered for harvesting and for insertion into the integrated air and missile defense architecture. (d) Application The prohibition in subsection (a) may not be superseded except by a provision of law that specifically supersedes, repeals, or modifies such subsection. 232. Additional missile defense site in the United States for optimized protection of the homeland (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama have each recognized the necessity for an additional measure of protection–beyond missile defense sites in Alaska and California–for defending the United States against intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) threats emanating from the Middle East. (2) General Jacoby, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, testified before Congress that we should consider that Iran has a capability within the next few years of flight testing ICBM capable technologies and that the Iranians are intent on developing an ICBM. (3) General Kehler, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, testified before Congress that I am confident that we can defend against a limited attack from Iran, although we are not in the most optimum posture to do that today * * * it doesn’t provide total defense today. (4) General Jacoby also testified before Congress that I would agree that a third site, wherever the decision is to build a third site, would give me better weapons access, increased GBI inventory and allow us the battle space to more optimize our defense against future threats from Iran and North Korea. (5) Section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678) directs the Missile Defense Agency— (A) to conduct environmental impact studies for three potential locations for an additional missile defense site capable of protecting the homeland; and (B) to develop a contingency plan in case the President determines to proceed with deployment of such an additional site. (6) According the Missile Defense Agency, the cost to deploy up to 20 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) at a new missile defense site on the East Coast of the United States is approximately $3,000,000,000 and would require approximately 5 to 6 years to complete. (b) Additional missile defense site (1) In general The Missile Defense Agency shall construct and make operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional homeland missile defense site capable of protecting the homeland, designed to complement existing sites in Alaska and California, to deal more effectively with the long-range ballistic missile threat from the Middle East. (2) Requirement in addition to other required activities regarding missile defense sites The Missile Defense Agency shall carry out the requirement in paragraph (1) to construct and deploy an additional homeland missile defense site (including any advance procurement and engineering and design in connection with such site) while continuing to meet the requirement to prepare environmental impact statements and a contingency plan under section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 for the missile defense sites described in that section. (3) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to Congress a report on the missile defense site required to be constructed and deployed under paragraph (1). The report shall include a description of the current estimate of the funding to be required for construction and deployment of the missile defense site, including for advance procurement, engineering and design, materials and construction, interceptor missiles, and sensors. 233. Limitation on removal of missile defense equipment from East Asia (a) Policy It is the policy of the United States that— (1) the missile defenses of the United States provide defense against multiple threats, including threats to the United States, allies of the United States, and the deployed forces of the United States; and (2) the elimination of one threat, for example the illegal nuclear weapons program of a rogue state, does not eliminate the reason the United States deploys missile defenses to a particular region, including to defend allies of the United States and deployed forces of the United States from other regional threats. (b) Limitation Except as provided by subsection (c) or (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter may be obligated or expended to remove missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia until a period of 180 days has elapsed following the date on which the President certifies to the congressional defense committees the following: (1) Each country in East Asia that poses a threat to allies of the United States has verifiably dismantled the nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs of such country. (2) The President has consulted with such allies with respect to the dismantlement described in paragraph (1) that— (A) such dismantlement has occurred; and (B) the missile defense platforms of the United States located in East Asia are no longer needed. (c) Waiver The President may waive the limitation in subsection (b) with respect to removing missile defense equipment of the United States from East Asia if— (1) the President submits to the congressional defense committees— (A) a certification that such waiver is in the national security interest of the United States; and (B) a report, in unclassified form, explaining— (i) why the President cannot make a certification for such removal under subsection (b); (ii) the national security interest covered by the certification made under subparagraph (A); and (iii) how the President will provide a commensurate level of defense for the United States, allies of the United States, and deployed forces of the United States, as provided by such missile defense equipment being removed; and (2) a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the President submits the information under paragraph (1). (d) Exception The limitation in subsection (b) shall not apply to destroyers and cruisers of the Navy equipped with the Aegis ballistic missile defense system. 234. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system (a) In general Section 225 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(3)(A), by inserting comprehensive before life-cycle; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (e) Quality of cost estimates (1) The Director shall ensure that each cost estimate included in an acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3) includes all operation and support costs, regardless of funding source, for which the Director is responsible. (2) In each such baseline submitted to the congressional defense committees, the Director shall state whether the underlying cost estimates in such baseline meet the criteria of the Comptroller General of the United States to be considered a high-quality estimate. If the Director states that such estimates do not meet such criteria, the Director shall include in such baseline the actions, including a schedule, that the Director plans to carry out for the estimates to meet such criteria. . (b) Report Not later than February 15, 2014, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report of the plans and schedule of the Director with respect to when the Director will meet the quality and criteria of cost estimates required by section 225(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2). 235. Analysis of alternatives for successor to precision tracking space system (a) Analysis of alternatives required (1) In general The Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in cooperation with the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation and the Defense Space Council, shall perform an analysis of alternatives for a successor to the precision tracking space system. (2) Consideration The Director shall ensure that the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) considers the following: (A) Current and future terrestrial, airborne, and space capabilities and capability gaps for missile defense sensing requirements. (B) Current and planned overhead persistent infrared architecture and the potential for the future exploitability of such architecture. (C) Lessons learned from the space tracking and surveillance system and precision tracking space system technology development programs. (D) Opinions of private industry based on the experience of such industry with delivering space capabilities. (E) Opportunities for such successor system to contribute to nonmissile defense missions with unmet requirements, including space situational awareness. (3) Role of other departments In conducting the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1), the Director shall compare the advantages and disadvantages, including in terms of costs, with respect to the Director— (A) developing a successor to the precision tracking space system solely for the Missile Defense Agency; and (B) cooperating with other heads of departments and agencies of the United States to develop space systems that are multi-mission, including by hosting payloads. (b) Submission required (1) Terms of reference Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees the terms of reference of the analysis of alternatives performed under subsection (a)(1). (2) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including— (A) the analysis of alternatives for a successor to the precision tracking space system performed under subsection (a)(1); and (B) a description of the potential platforms on which a hosted payload could be hosted. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (2) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Conforming repeal Section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1675) is repealed. 236. Plan to improve organic kill assessment capability of the ground-based midcourse defense system (a) Organic kill assessment capability The Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly develop— (1) options to achieve an organic kill assessment capability for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can be developed by not later than December 31, 2019, including by improving the command, control, battle management, and communications program and the sensor and communications architecture of the Agency; and (2) a plan to carry out such options that gives priority to including such capabilities in at least some of the 14 ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the Director, as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March 15, 2013. (b) Improved hit assessment The Director and the Commander of the United States Northern Command, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall jointly develop an interim capability for improved hit assessment for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can be integrated into near-term enhanced kill vehicle upgrades and refurbishment. (c) Submission to Congress Not later than March 15, 2014, the Director and the Commander of the United States Northern Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) the development of an organic kill assessment capability under subsection (a), including the plan developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and (2) the development of an interim capability for improved hit assessment under subsection (b). 237. Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, $15,000,000 may be obligated or expended for enhancing the capability for producing the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program in the United States, including for infrastructure, tooling, transferring data, special test equipment, and related components. 238. NATO and the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe (a) NATO funding (1) Phase I of EPAA Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall consult with the North Atlantic Council and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as NATO) on— (A) the funding of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe; and (B) establishing a plan for NATO to provide at least 50 percent of the infrastructure and operations and maintenance costs of phase I of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. (2) Phases II and III of EPAA The President shall use the NATO Military Common-Funded Resources process to seek to fund at least 50 percent of the costs for phases II and III of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. (3) Reports Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each 180-day period thereafter, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the funding provided by NATO pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2). (b) Interceptors If the Secretary of Defense determines that it is useful to the interests of the United States, the Secretary shall seek to engage with members of NATO to establish a NATO common pool of Aegis standard missile–3 block IA, standard missile–3 block IB, and standard missile–3 block IIA interceptors to defend NATO members through the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe. 239. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should not procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle for deployment until after the date on which a successful operational flight test of the Capability Enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred unless such procurement is for test assets or to maintain a warm line for the industrial base. 240. Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) President Ronald Reagan in March 1983, in a speech from the oval office, laid the corner stone for a long-term research and development program to begin to achieve our ultimate goal of eliminating the threat posed by strategic nuclear missiles. (2) President Reagan stated, I've become more and more deeply convinced that the human spirit must be capable of rising above dealing with other nations and human beings by threatening their existence * * * What if free people could live secure in the knowledge that their security did not rest upon the threat of instant United States retaliation to deter a Soviet attack, that we could intercept and destroy strategic ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of our allies?. (3) The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as Star Wars, challenged the nation to accomplish the impossible by moving beyond the obvious possibilities of the day to set the United States and our allies up for success. (4) In 1999, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), National Missile Defense (NMD) prototype interceptor successfully demonstrated “hit-to-kill” technology intercepting a modified Minuteman intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM). (5) Congress passed the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–38) (signed by President Clinton), which stated, It is the policy of the United States to deploy, as soon as is technologically possible, an effective National Missile Defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States against limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate). (6) On December 13, 2001, President George W. Bush announced I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our government's ability to develop ways to protect our people from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks. (7) Russian President Vladimir Putin said the move was not a threat to the security of the Russian Federation. (8) Since 2001, the United States has deployed considerable Missile Defense capability: 30 ground-based interceptors defending the continental U.S. today; 32 Aegis BMD ships; 113 SM–3 IA interceptors; 25 SM–3 IB interceptors; 3 THAAD batteries and 89 interceptors; and 8 AN/TPY–2 forward-based sensors. (9) The United States has partnerships with 22 nations, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), for missile defense cooperation. Likewise, India and South Korea are developing missile defenses and the Russian Federation and People’s Republic of China are also developing and improving missile defenses. (10) Since 2001 when they began development, United States missile defenses have had a test record of 58 of 73 hit-to-kill intercept attempts and have been successful across all programs of the integrated system, including Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD), Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), and PATRIOT Advanced Capability–3. (11) In July of 2004, the United States missile defense system was declared operational with limited capability. Since that time, it has offered defense against limited threats to the continental United States. (12) The United States has cooperatively developed with our Israeli allies a number of missile defense systems including Arrow, Arrow 3 and David’s Sling, systems which will protector our Israeli allies and contribute technology and expertise to United States systems. (13) The United States in support of NATO deployed a Patriot missile battery to defend the population and territory of Turkey and provide material support for Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty in the event of spillover from the Syrian civil war and has deployed Phase I of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, which includes a transportable x-band radar array and an on-station AEGIS ballistic missile defense ship armed with Standard Missile 3 block IA missile interceptors. (14) When United States territory, deployed forces and allies were threatened by North Korean ballistic missiles the United States had the operational capability and national will to deploy THAAD units to Guam to provide a defensive shield. (15) The United States continues to work jointly with Japan to improve the Navy Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) which in addition to providing missile defense in the Pacific is also a keystone in the Phased Adaptive Approach for European missile defense. (16) On-going research and development under the auspices of the Missile Defense Agency will continue to expand the technology envelope to deploy a layered missile defense system capable of defending the homeland, our military forces deployed overseas, friendly nations and our allies against all ballistic missiles from launch and orbit to reentry. (17) A credible ballistic missile defense system is critical to the national defense of the United States. (b) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) recognizes the inspiring leadership of President Ronald Reagan to maintain the peace through strength; (2) recognizes the enduring obligation President as Commander in Chief to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution; (3) commemorates the vision of President Reagan on the 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative; (4) believes that it is imperative that the United States continue fielding a robust missile defense system, including additional ground based interceptors; and (5) commits to supporting continued investments in future missile defense capabilities and emerging technologies such as directed energy and railguns. 241. Readiness of intercontinental ballistic missile force The Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to— (1) remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected and redundant command and control system of the missile field; and (2) be made fully operational with a deployed missile. 242. Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of the United States (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) On April 15, 2013, the National Security Advisor to the President, Tom Donilon, conveyed a personal letter from President Obama to the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin. (2) Press reports indicate that in this letter the President proposed, developing a legally-binding agreement on transparency, which would include exchange of information to confirm that our programs do not pose a threat to each other’s deterrence forces, through a so-called executive agreement, for which [the President] does not need to seek the consent of Congress.. (3) The Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergei Ryabkov, stated in response to the letter that, the proposals of the U.S. side on the issue are quite concrete and are related in a certain way to the discussions our countries had at various levels in the past years. And it cannot be said from this point of view that the offers are decorative and not serious. No, I want to emphasize that we are committing to the seriousness of these proposals but we note their insufficiency.. (4) Press reports indicate that the Secretary of the Russian Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, conveyed a response to the letter from President Putin. (5) President Obama’s proposed deal with Russian President Putin has been kept secret from Congress and the American people. (6) The Administration has systematically denied Congress information about past offers of United States missile defense concessions to Russia, including written requests from Members of the House of Representatives. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the President should promptly convey to Congress the details of any proposed deals with the Russian Federation concerning the missile defenses or nuclear arms of the United States; and (2) the missile defenses of the United States are central to the defense of the homeland from ballistic missile threats, particularly if nuclear deterrence fails, thus such defenses are not something that the President should continue to trade away for the prospects of nuclear arms reductions with Russia, the People’s Republic of China, or any other foreign country. D Reports 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program (a) Annual GAO review During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2018, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. (b) Annual reports (1) In general Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program conducted under subsection (a). (2) Matters to be included Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The extent to which the program is meeting development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and risk mitigation goals. (B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational capability and full operational capability dates for the amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results of— (i) developmental and operational testing of the vehicle; and (ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety. (C) An assessment of procurement plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and supplier performance. (D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such strategy is in compliance with acquisition management best-practices and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense. (E) An assessment of the projected operations and support costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford to operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle. (3) Additional information In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) and a report following any changes made by the Secretary of the Navy to the baseline documentation of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of— (A) the analysis of alternatives; (B) the initial capabilities document; and (C) the capabilities development document. 252. Report on strategy to improve body armor (a) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the comprehensive research and development strategy of the Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of body armor. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A brief description of each solution for body armor weight reduction that is being developed as of the date of the report. (2) For each such solution— (A) the costs, schedules, and performance requirements; (B) the research and development funding profile; (C) a description of the materials being used in the solution; and (D) the feasibility and technology readiness levels of the solution and the materials. (3) A strategy to provide resources for future research and development of body armor weight reduction. (4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight reduction. (5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates the research and development of body armor weight reduction being carried out by the military departments. (6) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate. 253. Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency initiative Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the investment strategy to accelerate fuel efficiency improvements to the current engine and transmission of the M1 Abrams series main battle tank as part of the Army’s Engineering Change Proposal Phase I strategy. 254. Report on powered rail system (a) Report required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the powered rail system compared to currently fielded solutions. Such report shall include each of the following: (1) Verification of relevant studies previously conducted by the Army, including that of the Maneuver Center of Excellence, which show that a typical infantry platoon requires approximately 430 pounds of batteries for a 72-hour mission, or roughly 10 pounds per soldier, and that the per-soldier, per-year procurement, storage, transport and disposal costs of these batteries are between $50,000 and $65,000. (2) An assessment of the comparative total cost of ownership, including procurement, fielding, training, and sustainment of the existing rail system and associated rail-mounted devices with respect to battery types and usage, when compared to that of a powered rail or intelligent rail system with a consolidated power source. (3) An assessment of the specific effects of excessive battery weight on soldier mobility, endurance and lethality determined through side-by-side time, endurance, motion and lethality tests between soldiers operating with existing rail-mounted weapon accessories and soldiers using the powered rail or intelligent rail solution. (4) An assessment of the advantages to the Army of incorporating the high-speed communications capability embedded in the powered rail or intelligent rail technology, including the integration of existing Army devices and devices in development such as the family of weapons sights and the enhanced night vision goggles, with the powered rail technology, and the connection of these previously unconnected devices to the soldier network. (b) Testing Any testing conducted in order to produce the report required by subsection (a) shall be supervised and validated by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of Defense. 255. Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship program Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that assesses whether the Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART) scholarship program, or related scholarship or fellowship programs within the Department of Defense, are providing the necessary number of undergraduate and graduate students in the fields of science, technology, engineer, and mathematics to meet the recommendations contained in the report of the Commission on Research and Development in the United States Intelligence Community, as well as recommendation for how SMART and similar program might be improved to better satisfy those recommendations. E Other Matters 261. Establishment of Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board (a) In general Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board (a) Establishment There shall be in the Department of Defense a Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board (in this section referred to as the Board) to review and assess the cryptographic modernization activities of the Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities pursuant to the roles and responsibilities outlined in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 6510.02D. (b) Members (1) The Secretary shall determine the number of members of the Board. (2) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board. (c) Responsibilities The Board shall— (1) review compliance with cease-use dates for specific cryptographic systems based on rigorous analysis of technical and threat factors and issue guidance, as needed, to relevant program executive offices and program managers; (2) monitor the overall cryptographic modernization efforts of the Department, including while such efforts are being executed; (3) convene in-depth technical program reviews, as needed, for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating current and in-draft requirements of systems of the Department of Defense and identifying programmatic risks; (4) develop a five-year cryptographic modernization plan to— (A) make recommendations to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council with respect to updating or modifying requirements for cryptographic modernization; and (B) identify previously unidentified requirements; (5) develop a long-term roadmap to— (A) ensure synchronization with major planning documents; (B) anticipate risks and issues in 10- and 20-year timelines; and (C) ensure that the expertise and insights of the military departments, Defense Agencies, the combatant commands, industry, academia, and key allies are included in the course of developing and carrying out cryptographic modernization activities; (6) develop a concept of operations for how cryptographic systems should function in a system-of-systems environment; and (7) advise the Secretary on the development of a cryptographic asset visibility system. (d) Exclusion of certain programs The Board shall not include programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 188 the following new item: 189. Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board. . 262. Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research Subparagraph (A) of section 257(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended to read as follows: (A) the State is eligible for the experimental program to stimulate competitive research under section 113 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 1862g); and . 263. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions (a) Clarification of availability of funds Section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): (b) Availability of funds for infrastructure revitalization projects (1) In general Subject to the provisions of this subsection, funds available under a mechanism under subsection (a) for specific laboratory infrastructure revitalization projects shall be available for such projects until expended. (2) Prior notice of costs of projects Funds shall be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project referred to in that paragraph only if the congressional defense committees are notified of the total cost of the project before the commencement of the project. (3) Accumulation of funds for projects Funds may accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five years. (4) Limitation on total cost of project Funds shall be available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project referred to in that paragraph only if the cost of the project does not exceed $4,000,000. . (b) Extension Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, is amended by striking September 30, 2016 and inserting September 30, 2020. (c) Application Subsection (b) of section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as added by subsection (a)(2), shall apply with respect to funds made available under such section 219 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 264. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements Section 2374a(f) of chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2013 and inserting September 30, 2018. 265. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking October 1, 2015 and inserting October 1, 2020. 266. Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university affiliated research centers (a) Briefing Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on power and energy research conducted at the university affiliated research centers. (b) Matters included The briefing under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of current and planned research on power grid issues conducted with other university-based energy centers. (2) A description of current and planned collaboration efforts regarding power grid issues with university-based research centers that have an expertise in energy efficiency and renewable energy, including efforts with respect to— (A) system failure and losses, including— (i) utility logistics and supply chain management for events resulting in system failure or other major damage; (ii) near real-time utility and law enforcement access to damage assessment information during events resulting in system failure or other major damage; (B) mitigation and response to disasters and attacks; (C) variable energy resource integration on the bulk power system; (D) integration of high penetrations of distributed energy technologies on the electric distribution system; (E) substation and asset hardening techniques appropriate for use in civilian areas; (F) facilitating development of training programs to support significant increase in required technical skills of present and future utility field forces, including hands-on training; and (G) facilitating increased consumer self-sufficiency. 267. Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and evaluation land (a) In general Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense, or the head of any other department or agency of the Federal Government, may not finalize any decision regarding new land use activity on covered land unless the Secretary concerned approves such activity in writing. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered land means ranges, test areas, or other land in the contiguous United States used by the Secretary of Defense for activities related to research, development, test, and evaluation that the Secretary determines, for purposes of this section, to be critical to national security. (2) The term new land use activity means an activity regarding the use of covered land that— (A) as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is not carried out on covered land; and (B) is carried out by, or in cooperation with, a department or agency of the Federal Government other than the Department of Defense. (3) The term Secretary concerned has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code. 268. Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report that— (1) describes how the Department of Defense intends to maintain the capability and infrastructure required to support canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors; (2) specifies the appropriate office to oversee the acquisition process, research and development, technology advancement, testing and evaluation, and production and procurement with respect to canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors; (3) specifies the plan to sustain and enhance the partnerships and relationships of the Department of Defense with service laboratories, private sector companies, and academic institutions to ensure that the latest data and information regarding canine capabilities are distributed throughout the Department and other Federal agencies that could benefit from such information; and (4) specifies any technologies capable of replacing the canine as a stand-off detection capability during the next 2 years. III Operation and Maintenance A Authorization of Appropriations 301. Operation and maintenance funding Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. 302. Authorization of appropriations for Marine Security Guard (a) Increase Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for Marine Security Guard is hereby increased by $13,400,000. (b) Offset Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, is hereby reduced by $13,400,000, to be derived from the Maneuver Units. 303. Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force (a) Increase Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Crisis Response Force is hereby increased by $10,600,000. (b) Offset Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Army, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, is hereby reduced by $10,600,000, to be derived from the Maneuver Units. B Energy and Environment 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4), by striking Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for that fiscal year and inserting The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for a fiscal year; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal year shall be submitted by the later of the following dates: (A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31. (B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year. . 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities (a) Use of funds under certain agreements Section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) and (j); and (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): (h) Interagency cooperation in conservation programs To avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect both the environment and military readiness, the recipient of funds provided pursuant an agreement under this section or under the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and waters within the scope of the agreement, use such funds to satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation program of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of the Interior notwithstanding any limitation of such program on the source of matching or cost-sharing funds. . (b) Sunset This section and subsection (h) of section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, as added by this section, shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any agreement referred to in such subsection that is entered into on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by striking fiscal years 2009 through 2014 each place it appears and inserting fiscal years 2014 through 2019. 314. Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to Department of Defense readiness activities (a) Multiyear agreements To fund long-Term management Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended— (1) by inserting (1) before Funds; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) In the case of a cooperative agreement under subsection (a)(2), funds referred to in paragraph (1)— (A) may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of the natural resource maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the agreement; and (B) may be invested by the recipient in accordance with the recipient’s own guidelines for the management and investment of financial assets, and any interest or income derived from such investment may be applied for the same purposes as the principal. . (b) Availability of funds and relation to other laws Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: (c) Availability of funds and relation to other laws (1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject to the availability of funds. (2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government. (3) Amounts available to the Department of Defense that are provided to any Federal, State, local, or nongovernmental entity for conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources in an area that is not on a military installation— (A) may only be used for payment of direct costs associated with the management of such area; and (B) may be used to pay not more than 3 percent of total project administrative costs, fees, and management charges. (4) Amounts available to the Department of Defense may not be used under this Act to acquire fee title interest in real property for natural resources projects that are not on a military installation. . (c) Annual audits Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Annual audits The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall annually audit each natural resources project funded with amounts available to the Department of Defense under this Act that is not on a military installation. . (d) Sunset This section and the provisions of law enacted by the amendments made by this section shall expire on October 1, 2019, except that any cooperative agreement referred to in such provisions that is entered into on or before September 30, 2019, shall continue according to its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired. 315. Exclusions from definition of chemical substance under Toxic Substances Control Act Section 3(2)(B)(v) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)(v)) is amended by striking , and and inserting ‘‘and any component of such an article (including, without limitation, shot, bullets and other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used in such an article, and primers), and’’. 316. Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by adding at the end the following: This section shall not apply to the Department of Defense.. 317. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruction 4715.19, issued as required by section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or any successor instruction, the term covered waste specifically includes, in addition to the materials already specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2) of such section, the following: (1) Tires. (2) Treated wood. (3) Batteries. (4) Plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover plastic materials from the solid waste stream. (5) Munitions and explosives, the destruction of which is covered in Department of Defense Instruction 6055.09–M (Reference (i)). (6) Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves removed. (7) Fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its contents. (8) Aerosol cans. (9) Polychlorinated biphenyls. (10) Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than waste fuel for initial combustion). (11) Asbestos. (12) Mercury. (13) Foam tent material. (14) Any item containing any of the materials referred to in a preceding paragraph. 318. Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels refineries Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels unless such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction is specifically authorized by law. 319. Limitation on procurement of biofuels (a) In general Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to purchase or produce biofuels until the earlier of the following dates: (1) The date on which the cost of the biofuel is equal to the cost of conventional fuels purchased by the Department. (2) The date on which the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), and the sequestration in effect by reason of such Act, are no longer in effect. (b) Exceptions The limitation under subsection (a) shall not apply to biofuels purchased— (1) in limited quantities necessary to complete test and certification; or (2) for the biofuel research and development efforts of the Department. 320. Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation (a) Establishment of the southern sea otter military readiness areas Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall establish areas to be known as Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following: (1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates: N. Latitude/W. Longitude 33°27.8′/119°34.3′ 33°20.5′/119°15.5′ 33°13.5′/119°11.8′ 33°06.5′/119°15.3′ 33°02.8′/119°26.8′ 33°08.8′/119°46.3′ 33°17.2′/119°56.9′ 33°30.9′/119°54.2′; (2) That area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide line designated by 33 CFR part 165 on May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone. (b) Activities within the southern sea otter military readiness areas (1) Incidental takings under Endangered Species Act of 1973 Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity. (2) Incidental takings under Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting military readiness activities. (3) Treatment as species proposed to be listed For purposes of any military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533). (c) Removal Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas as of the effective date of this section or thereafter be removed from the Areas. (d) Revision or termination of exceptions The Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that military activities authorized under subsection (b) are impeding southern sea otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population levels. (e) Monitoring (1) In general The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness activities on the growth or decline of the sea otter population and on the near-shore eco-system. Monitoring and research parameters and methods shall be determined in consultation with the service. (2) Reports Within 24 months after the effective date of this section and every three years thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1). (f) Definitions In this section: (1) Incidental taking The term incidental taking means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. (2) Optimum sustainable population The term optimum sustainable population means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element. (3) Southern sea otter The term southern sea otter means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis. (4) Take The term take— (A) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531–1544) shall have the meaning given such term in that statute; and (B) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361–1423h), shall have the meaning given such term in that statute. (5) Military readiness activity The term military readiness activity has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2509; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), and includes all training and operations of the Armed Forces that relate to combat, and the adequate and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following: 7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas. . (c) Conforming Amendment Section 1 of Public Law 99–625 (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed. C Logistics and Sustainment 321. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (a) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the Comptroller General of the United States a strategic sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan shall include each of the following: (1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing the plan. (2) An identification of the requirements and planning for the long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and its mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1482). (3) A description of the current and future operating environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or referred to in strategic guidance and planning documents of the Department of Defense. (4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship when forward deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel required to conduct the necessary maintenance activities. (5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and delivery of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent repair. (6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of pier-side maintenance timelines when forward-deployed, including requirements for multiple ships and variants. (7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of fly away teams required to support forward-deployed maintenance requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in Singapore, and estimates for follow-on deployments of Littoral Combat Ships of both variants. (8) A detailed description of the continuity of operations plans for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans to increase the number of Squadron personnel. (9) An identification of mission critical single point of failure equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral Combat Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts locations and levels. (b) Form The plan required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified annex. 322. Review of critical manufacturing capabilities within Army arsenals (a) Review The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the directors of the Defense Agencies, shall conduct a review of the current and expected manufacturing requirements across the Department of Defense to identify critical manufacturing competencies, supplies, components, end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for which no or a limited domestic commercial source exists. In conducting the review under this section, the Secretary— (1) shall assess which of the competencies for which no or a limited domestic commercial source exists could be executed by an arsenal owned by the United States; and (2) may review other manufacturing capabilities, as the Secretary determines appropriate, to determine if such capabilities could be executed by an arsenal owned by the United States. (b) Congressional briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the results of the review conducted under subsection (a). 323. Inclusion of Army arsenals capabilities in solicitations (a) Determination of use of arsenals (1) Solicitation of information When undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall solicit information from an arsenal owned by the United States regarding the capability of the arsenal to fulfill a manufacturing requirement. (2) Submittal of material solution Upon a determination, that an arsenal owned by the United States is capable of fulfilling a manufacturing requirement, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager shall allow the arsenal to submit a material solution in response to the requirement. (b) Notification of solicitations When issuing a solicitation, a Program Executive Officer or Program Manager shall notify each arsenal owned by the United States of any manufacturing requirement that the arsenal has the capability to fulfill and allow the arsenal to submit a proposal in response to the requirement. 324. Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of certain functions to contractor performance No Department of Defense function that is performed by Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a certain military base may be converted to performance by a contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act) and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act) that are located in the geographic area near the military base. D Reports 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness (a) Assessment of assigned missions and contractor support Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (j); and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsections: (g) Combatant command assigned mission assessments (1) Each report shall also include an assessment by each commander of a geographic or functional combatant command of the ability of the command to successfully execute each of the assigned missions of the command. Each such assessment for a combatant command shall also include a list of the mission essential tasks for each assigned mission of the command and an assessment of the ability of the command to successfully complete each task within prescribed timeframes. (2) For purposes of this subsection, the term assigned mission means any contingency response program plan, theater campaign plan, or named operation that is approved and assigned by the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (h) Risk assessment of dependence on contractor support Each report shall also include an assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk incurred by using contract support in contingency operations as required under Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, Policies and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix. (i) Combat support agencies assessment (1) Each report shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the military readiness of the combat support agencies, including, for each such agency— (A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness and readiness of the agency to support operating forces in the event of a war or threat to national security, including— (i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment of the ability of the agency to successfully perform those tasks; (ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency to accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) affects the ability of the military departments and the unified and geographic combatant commands to execute operations and contingency plans by number; (iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended to address such deficiencies; and (iv) key indicators and other relevant information related to any deficiency or other problem identified; (B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers appropriate. (2) In this subsection, the term combat support agency means any of the following Defense Agencies: (A) The Defense Information Systems Agency. (B) The Defense Intelligence Agency. (C) The Defense Logistics Agency. (D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only with respect to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense). (E) The Defense Contract Management Agency. (F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency. (G) The National Reconnaissance Office. (H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense) and Central Security Service. (I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat support agency by the Secretary of Defense. . (b) Conforming amendment Such section is further amended in subsection (a), by striking and (f) and inserting (f), (g), (h), and (i). 332. Repeal of annual Comptroller General report on Army progress Section 323 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2146; 10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended— (1) by striking subsection (d); (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and (3) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking or (d). 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) is amended by striking in excess of $30,000,000 and all that follows and inserting (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the future-years defense program for which the budget is submitted (as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of $378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of the appropriation and fund source, directly related to the assets definition, design, development, deployment, sustainment, and disposal.. 334. Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico (a) Identification of military munitions and navy operational history (1) Records review The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of all existing Department of Defense records to determine and describe the historical use of military munitions and military training on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The review shall, to the extent practicable and based on historical documents available, identify the type of munitions, the quantity of munitions, and the location where such munitions may have potentially been used or may be remaining on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays or waters. The historical review shall also determine the type of various military training exercises that occurred on each island and in the nearby cays and waters. (2) Cooperation and consultation The Secretary of Defense may request the assistance of other Federal agencies and may consult the Governor of Puerto Rico as may be deemed appropriate in conducting the review required by this subsection and in preparing the report required by subsection (b). (b) Report Not later than 450 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and shall make publicly available, a report detailing the findings and determinations of the review required by subsection (a). The report shall be organized to include the information detailed in subsection (a) in addition to site history, site description, real estate ownership information, and any other information about known military munitions and military training that occurred historically on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. The report shall include any information and recommendations that the Secretary deems appropriate about the potential hazards to the public associated with unexploded ordnance on the islands of Vieques and Culebra, Puerto Rico, and in the nearby cays and waters. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term military munitions has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code. (2) The term unexploded ordnance has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code. E Limitations and Extensions of Authority 341. Limitation on reduction of force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores The Secretary of the Air Force may not reduce the force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, relative to the force structure at such Air Force Base as of October 1, 2013, until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense concludes the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary on January 25, 2013, and briefs the congressional defense committees regarding such Assessment. Such briefing shall include a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in supporting the United Stated overseas force posture. 342. Prohibition on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration teams outside the United States (a) Prohibition None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 may be used for the performance of flight demonstration teams under the jurisdiction of the Secretary at any location outside the United States. (b) United States In this section, the term United States means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States. F Other Matters 351. Requirement to establish policy on joint combat uniforms (a) Establishment of policy It is the policy of the United States that by not later than October 1, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall require all military services to use a joint combat camouflage uniform, including color and pattern variants designed for specific combat environments. (b) Prohibition Except as provided in subsection (c), each military service shall be prohibited from adopting a new combat camouflage uniform, unless— (1) the combat camouflage utility uniform will be a joint uniform adopted by all military services; or (2) the military services adopt a uniform currently in use by another military service. (c) Exceptions Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed as— (1) prohibiting the development or fielding of combat and camouflage utility uniforms for use by personnel assigned to or operating in support of the unified combatant command for special operations forces described in section 167 of title 10, United States Code; (2) prohibiting the military services from fielding ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, or other such items as determined by the Secretaries of the military departments; or (3) prohibiting the military services from issuing working or vehicle crew uniforms. (d) Guidance required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement this section. At a minimum, such guidance shall— (1) require the Secretaries of the military departments to collaborate on the development of joint criteria for the design, development, fielding, and characteristics of combat camouflage uniforms; (2) require the Secretaries of the military departments to ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms meet the geographic and operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands; and (3) require the Secretaries of the military departments to ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility uniforms achieve interoperability with other components of individual war fighter systems, including organizational clothing and individual equipment such as body armor and other individual protective systems. (e) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in subsection (b) if the Secretary certifies to Congress that there are exceptional operational circumstances that require the development or fielding of a new combat camouflage uniform. (f) Repeal of policy Section 352 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84, 123 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is hereby repealed. IV Military Personnel Authorizations A Active Forces 401. End strengths for active forces The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows: (1) The Army, 520,000. (2) The Navy, 323,600. (3) The Marine Corps, 190,200. (4) The Air Force, 327,600. 402. Revision in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs: (1) For the Army, 520,000. (2) For the Navy, 323,600. (3) For the Marine Corps, 190,200. (4) For the Air Force, 327,600. . B Reserve Forces 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve (a) In general The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2014, as follows: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200. (2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400. (7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000. (b) End strength reductions The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by— (1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and (2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year. (c) End strength increases Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2014, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. (2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. (3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status) The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following: (1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210. (2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. (3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,875. (4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians (a) Limitations (1) National guard Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the following: (A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 1,600. (B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350. (2) Army reserve The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 595. (3) Air force reserve The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2014, may not exceed 90. (b) Non-dual status technicians defined In this section, the term non-dual status technician has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following: (1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. (2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. (3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. (4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. (5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. (6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. C Authorization of Appropriations 421. Military personnel (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. (b) Construction of authorization The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2014. V Military Personnel Policy A Officer Personnel Policy Generally 501. Limitations on number of general and flag officers on active duty (a) Per-service limitations; limited joint duty exclusions Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 502 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1387) and section 501(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1714), is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 231 and inserting 226 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 162 and inserting 157; and (C) in paragraph (3), by striking 198 and inserting 193; and (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 310 and inserting 300; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 85 and inserting 81; (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 61 and inserting 59; (iii) in subparagraph (C), by striking 73 and inserting 70; and (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking 21 and inserting 20. (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2014. B Reserve Component Management 511. Minimum notification requirements for members of reserve components before deployment or cancellation of deployment related to a contingency operation Section 12301 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (e), by striking The period and inserting Subject to subsection (i), the period; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (i) (1) The Secretary concerned shall provide not less than 120 days advance notice to a unit of the reserve components that— (A) will be ordered to active duty for deployment in connection with a contingency operation; or (B) having been notified of such a deployment, has such deployment canceled, postponed, or otherwise altered. (2) If a member of the reserve components is not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit or is to be ordered to active duty apart from the member’s unit, the required notice under paragraph (1) shall be provided directly to the member. (3) If the Secretary concerned fails to provide timely notification as required by paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary concerned shall submit, within 30 days after the date of the failure, written notification to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate explaining the reason for the failure and the units and members of the reserve components affected. . 512. Information to be provided to boards considering officers for selective early removal from reserve active-status list (a) Officers to be considered; exclusions Section 14704(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (1) before Whenever ; (2) by striking all officers on that list and inserting officers on the reserve active-status list; (3) by striking the reserve active-status list, in the number specified by the Secretary by each grade and competitive category. and inserting that list.; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of officers in a reserve component whose names are submitted to a board under paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the reserve active-status list for that reserve component in the same grade and competitive category whose position on the reserve active-status list is between— (A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board; and (B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board. (3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may not include an officer who— (A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or (B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of law during the fiscal year in which the board is convened or during the following fiscal year. . (b) Specification of number of officers who may be recommended for removal Such section is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection: (b) Specification of number of officers who may be recommended for separation The Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify the number of officers described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for separation under subsection (c). . 513. Temporary authority to maintain active status and inactive status lists of members in the inactive National Guard (a) Authority to maintain active and inactive status lists in the inactive national guard (1) Active and inactive status lists authorized The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may maintain an active status list and an inactive status list of members in the inactive Army National Guard and the inactive Air National Guard, respectively. (2) Total number on all lists at one time The total number of members of the Army National Guard and members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists and the inactive status lists assigned to the inactive National Guard may not exceed a total of 10,000 at any time. (3) Total number on active status lists at one time The total number of members of the Army National Guard and members of the Air National Guard on the active status lists of the inactive National Guard may not exceed 4,000 at any time. (4) Condition of implementation Before the authority provided by this subsection is used to establish an active status list and an inactive status list of members in the inactive Army National Guard or the inactive Air National Guard, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a copy of the implementation guidance to be used to execute this authority. (b) Additional enlisted member transfer authority In addition to the transfer authority provided by section 303(b) of title 32, United States Code, while an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists— (1) an enlisted member of the active Army National Guard may be transferred to the inactive Army National Guard without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the inactive Army National Guard; and (2) an enlisted member of the active Air National Guard may be transferred to the inactive Air National Guard without regard to whether the member was formerly enlisted in the inactive Air National Guard. (c) Removal of restrictions on transfer of officers While an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists, nothing in chapter 3 of title 32, United States Code, shall be construed to prevent any of the following: (1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Army National Guard from being transferred from the active Army National Guard to the inactive Army National Guard. (2) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the Air National Guard from being transferred from the active Air National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard. (3) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to the inactive Army National Guard from being transferred from the inactive Army National Guard to the active Army National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit. (4) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the inactive Air National Guard from being transferred from the inactive Air National Guard to the active Air National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit. (d) Status and training categories for members in inactive status While an inactive status list for the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists— (1) the first sentence of subsection (b) of section 10141 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply only with respect to members of the reserve components assigned to the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard who are assigned to such inactive status list; and (2) the exclusion of the Army National Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the United States under the first sentence of subsection (c) of such section shall not apply. (e) Eligibility for inactive-duty training pay While an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists, the limitation on pay for inactive-duty training contained in section 206(c) of title 37, United States Code, shall apply only to persons assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National Guard, rather than to all persons enlisted in the inactive National Guard. (f) Conforming amendments (1) Modification of active status definition Section 101(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: However, while an inactive status list for the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard exists, such term means the status of a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the United States who is not assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive Army National Guard or inactive Air National Guard, on another inactive status list, or in the Retired Reserve.. (2) Computation of years of service for entitlement to retired pay Paragraph (3) of section 12732(b) of such title is amended to read as follows: (3) Service in the inactive National Guard (for any period other than a period in which an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists) and service while assigned to the inactive status list of the inactive National Guard (for any period in which an inactive status list for the inactive National Guard exists). . (g) Evaluation of use of authority (1) Independent study required Before the end of the period specified in subsection (h), the Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent study to evaluate the effectiveness of using an active status list for the inactive National Guard to improve the readiness of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard. (2) Elements As part of the study required by this subsection, the entity conducting the study shall determine, for each year in which the temporary authority provided by subsection (a) is used— (A) how many members of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard were transferred to the active status list of the inactive National Guard; (B) how many of these vacancies were filled with personnel new to the Army National Guard; (C) the additional cost of filling these positions; and (D) the impact on drill and annual training participation rates. (3) Additional consideration The study required by this subsection also shall include an assessment of the impact of the use of the temporary authority provided by subsection (a) on medical readiness category 3B personnel transferred to the active status inactive National Guard, including— (A) how long it took them to complete the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process; and (B) how satisfied they were with their unit’s management and collaboration during the IDES process. (4) Submission of results Not later than 180 days after completion of the study required by this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report containing the results of the study. (h) Duration of authority The authority provided by subsection (a) for the maintenance of both an active status list and inactive status list of members in the inactive National Guard exists only during the period beginning on October 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2018. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general and flag officers in an active status (a) Review required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the general officer and flag officer requirements for members of the reserve component in an active status. (b) Purpose of review The purpose of the review is to ensure that the authorized strengths provided in section 12004 of title 10, United States Code, for reserve general officers and reserve flag officers in an active status— (1) are based on an objective requirements process and are sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and administration of the reserve components; (2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve component general and flag officers can continue to be assigned on active duty in joint duty and in-service military positions; (3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and number of exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 12004 of title 10, United States Code; (4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or flag officer positions, including through the conversion of certain reserve component general or flag officer positions to senior civilian positions; and (5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and adjustment. (c) Report Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review, including such recommendations for changes in law and policy related to authorized reserve general and flag officers strengths as the Secretary considers to be appropriate. 515. Feasability study on establishing a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (a) Study required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing— (1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; and (2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. (b) Force structure elements of study In conducting the study required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following: (1) The allocation of National Guard force structure and manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the impact of this allocation on existing National Guard units in the 50 states, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the District of Columbia. (2) The Federal funding that would be required to support pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment, including maintenance, required to support such force structure. (3) The presence of existing infrastructure to support a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the requirement for additional infrastructure, including information technology infrastructure, to support such force structure, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1). (4) How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would accommodate the National Guard Bureau’s Essential Ten homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering, civil support teams, security, medical, transportation, maintenance, logistics, joint force headquarters, and communications) and reflect regional needs. (5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and full-time support, including National Guard technicians, required to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to support demographically a unit of the National Guard at each location. (6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges associated with transportation, communications, supply/resupply, and training operations and missions. (c) Submission of results Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a). The report shall also include the following: (1) A determination of whether the executive branch of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for establishing a unit of the National Guard, and a description of any other steps that such executive branches must take to request and carry out the establishment of a National Guard unit. (2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37, United States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. (3) A description of any required Department of Defense actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. (4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and actions described in the preceding paragraphs. 516. Designation of State student cadet corps as Department of Defense youth organizations Section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (14) as paragraph (15); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following new paragraph (14): (14) Any State student cadet corps authorized under State law. . C General Service Authorities 521. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (a) Review The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of— (1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System with respect to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of addressing the matters specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); and (2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability Evaluation System specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection. (b) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the review under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following: (1) With respect to the reserve components of the Armed Forces— (A) the number of pending cases that exist as of the date of the report, listed by military department, component, and, with respect to the National Guard, State; (B) as of the date of the report, the average time it takes to process a case in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; (C) a description of the steps the Secretary will take to resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; and (D) the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve such backlog for each military department. (2) With respect to the regular components and reserve components of the Armed Forces— (A) a description of the progress being made to transition the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format that a member of the Armed Forces may access and see the status of the member during each phase of the system; (B) an estimate of the cost to complete the transition to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; and (C) an assessment of the feasibility of improving in-transit visibility of pending cases, including by establishing a method of tracking a pending case when a military treatment facility is assigned a packet and pending case for action regarding a member. (c) Pending case defined In this section, the term pending case means a case involving a member of the Armed Forces who, as of the date of the review under subsection (a), is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System and has been referred to a medical evaluation board. 522. Compliance requirements for organizational climate assessments (a) Verification and tracking requirements The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretaries of the military departments to verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments required as part of the comprehensive policy for the Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1753). (b) Implementation No later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing— (1) a description of the progress of the development of the system that will verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments; and (2) an estimate of when the system will be completed and implemented. 523. Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside the United States Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall take such steps as may be necessary to ensure that there is continuous, designated military command responsibility and accountability for the care, handling, and transportation of the remains of each deceased member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who died outside the United States, beginning with the initial recovery of the remains, through the defense mortuary system, until the interment of the remains or the remains are otherwise accepted by the person designated as provided by section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, to direct disposition of the remains. 524. Contents of Transition Assistance Program (a) In general Section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (9) Provide information about disability-related employment and education protections. . (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e), as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Additional elements of program The mandatory program carried out by this section shall include— (1) for any such member who plans to use the member’s entitlement to educational assistance under title 38— (A) instruction providing an overview of the use of such entitlement; and (B) courses of post-secondary education appropriate for the member, courses of post-secondary education compatible with the member’s education goals, and instruction on how to finance the member’s post-secondary education; and (2) instruction in the benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and in other subjects determined by the Secretary concerned. . (b) Deadline for implementation The program carried out under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall comply with the requirements of subsections (b)(9) and (c) of such section, as added by subsection (a), by not later than April 1, 2015. (c) Feasibility study Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the results of a study carried out by the Secretary to determine the feasibility of providing the instruction described in subsection (b) of section 1142 of title 10, United States Code, at all overseas locations where such instruction is provided by entering into a contract jointly with the Secretary of Labor for the provision of such instruction. 525. Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records (a) Availability of Judicial review; limitations (1) In general Chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 1560. Judicial review of decisions relating to correction of military records (a) Availability of judicial review (1) In general Pursuant to sections 1346 and 1491 of title 28 and chapter 7 of title 5 any person adversely affected by a records correction final decision may obtain judicial review of the decision in a court with jurisdiction to hear the matter. (2) Records correction final decision defined In this section, the term records correction final decision means any of the following decisions: (A) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1552 of this title. (B) A final decision issued by the Secretary concerned pursuant to section 1034(f) of this title. (C) A final decision issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1034(g) of this title. (b) Exhaustion of administrative remedies (1) General rule Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), judicial review of a matter that could be subject to correction under a provision of law specified in subsection (a)(2) may not be obtained under this section or any other provision of law unless— (A) the petitioner has requested a correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title); and (B) the Secretary concerned has rendered a final decision denying that correction in whole or in part. (2) Whistleblower cases When the final decision of the Secretary concerned is subject to review by the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g) of this title, the petitioner is not required to seek such review before obtaining judicial review, but if the petitioner does seek such review, judicial review may not be sought until the earlier of the following occurs: (A) The Secretary of Defense makes a decision in the matter. (B) The period specified in section 1034(g) of this title for the Secretary to make a decision in the matter expires. (3) Class actions If judicial review of a records correction final decision is sought, and the petitioner for such judicial review also seeks to bring a class action with respect to a matter for which the petitioner requested a correction under section 1552 of this title (including such a request in a matter arising under section 1034 of this title) and the court issues an order certifying a class in the case, paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to any member of the certified class (other than the petitioner) with respect to any matter covered by a claim for which the class is certified. (4) Timeliness Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the records correction final decision of the Secretary concerned is not issued by the date that is 18 months after the date on which the petitioner requests a correction. (c) Statutes of limitation (1) Six years from final decision A records correction final decision (other than in a matter to which paragraph (2) applies) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court not later than six years after the date of the records correction final decision. (2) Six years for certain claims that may result in payment of money (A) In a case of a records correction final decision described in subparagraph (B), the records correction final decision (or the portion of such decision described in such subparagraph) is not subject to judicial review under this section or otherwise subject to review in any court unless petition for such review is filed in a court before the end of the six-year period that began on the date of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or death while on active duty, of the person whose military records are the subject of the correction request. Such six-year period does not include any time between the date of the filing of the request for correction of military records leading to the records correction final decision and the date of the final decision. (B) Subparagraph (A) applies to a records correction final decision or portion of the decision that involves a denial of a claim that, if relief were to be granted by the court, would support, or result in, the payment of money, other than payments made under chapter 73 of this title, either under a court order or under a subsequent administrative determination. (d) Habeas corpus This section does not affect any cause of action arising under chapter 153 of title 28. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 1560. Judicial review of decisions. . (b) Effect of denial of request for correction of records when prohibited personnel action alleged (1) Notice of denial; procedures for judicial review Subsection (f) of section 1034 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (7) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary concerned shall provide the member or former member— (A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (B) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. . (2) Secretary of defense review; notice of denial Subsection (g) of such section is amended— (A) by inserting (1) before Upon the completion of all; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) The submittal of a matter to the Secretary of Defense by the member or former member under paragraph (1) must be made within 90 days of the receipt by the member or former member of the final decision of the Secretary of the military department concerned in the matter. In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary of Defense results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction of the record of the member or former member, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the member or former member— (A) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (B) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. . (3) Sole basis for judicial review Such section is further amended— (A) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) and (j), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): (h) Judicial review (1) A decision of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (g) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. (2) In a case in which review by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (g) was not sought, a decision of the Secretary of a military department under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. (3) A decision by the Secretary of Homeland Security under subsection (f) shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. . (c) Effect of denial of other requests for correction of military records Section 1552 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (h) In any case in which the final decision of the Secretary concerned results in denial, in whole or in part, of any requested correction, the Secretary concerned shall provide the claimant— (1) a concise written statement of the basis for the decision; and (2) a notification of the availability of judicial review of the decision pursuant to section 1560 of this title and the time period for obtaining such review in accordance with the applicable statute of limitations. (i) A decision by the Secretary concerned under this section shall be subject to judicial review only as provided in section 1560 of this title. . (d) Effective date and application (1) In general The amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2015, and shall apply to all final decisions of the Secretary of Defense under section 1034(g) of title 10, United States Code, and of the Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security under sections 1034(f) or 1552 of such title rendered on or after such date. (2) Treatment of existing cases This section and the amendments made by this section do not affect the authority of any court to exercise jurisdiction over any case that was properly before the court before the effective date specified in paragraph (1). (e) Implementation The Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of Homeland Security (in the case of the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy) may prescribe regulations, and interim guidance before prescribing such regulations, to implement the amendments made by this section. Regulations or interim guidance prescribed by the Secretary of a military department may not take effect until approved by the Secretary of Defense. 526. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators (a) Establishment of definitions Section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Definitions In this section: (1) Gender-neutral occupational standard The term gender-neutral occupational standard, with respect to a military career designator, means that all members of the Armed Forces serving in or assigned to the military career designator must meet the same physical and performance outcome-based standards for the successful accomplishment of the necessary and required specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned to the military career designator. (2) Military career designator The term military career designator refers to— (A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties, specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted classification codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification identifiers; and (B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of concentration, occupational specialties, specialty codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification identifiers. . (b) Use of definitions Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking military occupational career field and inserting military career designator; and (B) in paragraph (1), by striking common, relevant performance standards and inserting an occupational standard; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking any military occupational specialty and inserting any military career designator; and (ii) by striking requirements for members in that specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational specialty and inserting requirements as part of the gender-neutral occupational standard for members in that career designator and shall ensure (in the case of a career designator; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking an occupational specialty and inserting a military career designator; (ii) by striking that occupational specialty and inserting that military career designator; and (iii) by striking that specialty and inserting that military career designator; and (3) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking the occupational standards for a military occupational field and inserting the gender-neutral occupational standard for a military career designator; and (B) by striking that occupational field and inserting that military career designator. 527. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions (a) Expansion of prohibited retaliatory personnel actions Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)(B)— (A) by striking or at the end of clause (iv); (B) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi); and (C) by inserting after clause (iv) the following new clause (v): (v) a court-martial proceeding; or ; and (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after any favorable action the following: , or a significant change in a member's duties, responsibilities, or working conditions. (b) Inspector General investigations of allegations Subsection (c) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (3) and inserting paragraph (4); (2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraph (A): (A) Any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, including a law or regulation prohibiting rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment or unlawful discrimination. ; (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not be excluded from the protections provided in this section because— (A) the communication was made to a person who participated in an activity that the member reasonably believed to be covered by paragraph (2); (B) the communication revealed information that had previously been communicated; (C) of the member’s motive for making the communication; (D) the communication was not made in writing; (E) the communication was made while the member was off duty; (F) the communication was made during the normal course of duties of the member. ; (5) in subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4), as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this subsection, by inserting before the period at the end of the second sentence the following: , with the consent of the member; (6) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated— (A) by striking paragraph (3)(A) and inserting paragraph (4)(A); (B) by striking paragraph (3)(D) and inserting paragraph (4)(D); and (C) by striking 60 days and inserting one year. (c) Inspector General investigations of underlying allegations Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (c)(2) and inserting subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (c)(2). (d) Reports on investigations Subsection (e) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking subsection (c)(3)(E) both places it appears and inserting subsection (c)(4)(E); (B) by striking the Secretary of Defense and inserting the Secretary of the military department concerned; (C) by striking to the Secretary, and inserting to such Secretary,; (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the Secretary of Defense and inserting the Secretary of the military department concerned; (3) in paragraph (4), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: The report shall include an explicit determination as to whether a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred and a recommendation as to the disposition of the complaint, including appropriate corrective action for the member.. (e) Action in case of violations Section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j), as redesignated by section 525(b) of this Act, as subsections (k) and (l), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (h), as added by section 525(b), the following new subsection: (i) Action in case of violations (1) If an Inspector General reports under subsection (e) that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, not later than 30 days after receiving such report from the Inspector General, the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, shall order such action as is necessary to correct the record of a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b), taking into account the recommendations in the report by the Inspector General. Such Secretary shall take any appropriate disciplinary action against the individual who committed such prohibited personnel action. (2) If the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, determines that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not appropriate, not later than 30 days after making the determination, such Secretary shall— (A) provide to the Secretary of Defense, the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and the member or former member, a notice of the determination and the reasons for not taking action; and (B) refer the report to the appropriate board for the correction of military records for further review under subsection (g). . (f) Correction of records Subsection (f) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking may and inserting upon the request of the member or former member, after an initial determination that a complaint is not frivolous and has not previously been addressed by the board, shall; and (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking board elects to hold and inserting board holds; and (B) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking may be provided and inserting shall be provided; and (ii) in clause (ii), by striking the case is unusually complex or otherwise requires and inserting the member or former member would benefit from. (g) Burdens of proof Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (i), as added by subsection (e) of this section, the following new subsection: (j) Burdens of proof The burdens of proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation conducted by an Inspector General, and any review conducted by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and any board for the correction of military records, under this section. . (h) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to allegations pending or submitted under section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, on or after that date. 528. Applicability of medical examination requirement regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury to proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice Section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c). 529. Protection of the religious freedom of military chaplains to close a prayer outside of a religious service according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group (a) United states army Section 3547 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (b) United states military academy Section 4337 of such title is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before There; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (c) United states navy and marine corps Section 6031 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (d) United states air force Section 8547 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, a chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . (e) United states air force academy Section 9337 of such title is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before There; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) If called upon to lead a prayer outside of a religious service, the Chaplain shall have the prerogative to close the prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of the endorsing faith group. . 530. Expansion and implementation of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members (a) Accommodation of members’ beliefs, actions, and speech Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is amended— (1) by striking The Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs and inserting Except in cases of military necessity, the Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs, actions, and speech; and (2) by inserting , actions, or speech after such beliefs. (b) Narrow exception Subsection (a)(2) of such section is amended by striking that threaten and inserting that actually harm. (c) Deadline for regulations; consultation The implementation regulations required by subsection (c) of such section shall be issued not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. In preparing such regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the official military faith-group representatives who endorse military chaplains. 530A. Servicemembers’ Accountability, Rights, and Responsibilities Training (a) Responsibilities of Secretary of Defense (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Secretaries of the military departments, shall ensure that all members of the Armed Forces understand and comply with the rights and responsibilities specified in subsections (b) and (c). (2) Implementation The Secretary of Defense shall have discretion regarding the manner in which this information will be disseminated to members, except that, at a minimum, the Secretary shall require acknowledgment of these rights and responsibilities by a member at these occurrences during the military service of the member: (A) Recruitment. (B) Enlistment and reenlistment. (C) Commissioning. (D) Promotion in rank. (E) Selection for command. (b) Member rights Each member of the Armed Forces has the following rights: (1) To a workplace and battlespace free from the threat of sexual violence, including harassment, abuse, assault, and rape. (2) To have every instance of illegal activity appropriately investigated. Law enforcement agencies will investigate every allegation of criminal behavior, and commanders will respond appropriately to every report of wrongdoing. (3) To make a restricted or unrestricted report of a sex-based criminal act. Victims will have access to vital services whether they pursue an investigation or not. (4) To use any and all reporting and prosecution avenues to pursue an allegation of sexual assault. (5) To not face retaliation for reporting a criminal offense or harmful behavior. (c) Member responsibilities Each member of the Armed Forces has the following responsibilities: (1) To responsibly intervene in any situation that involves the presence or threat of criminal behavior. (2) To never leave another member behind in a situation of risk to self or others, on the battlefield or anywhere else. (3) To immediately report observation or knowledge of criminal behavior to appropriate officials. 530B. Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports of sexual assault (a) Review required The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct a review— (1) to identify all members of the Armed Forces who, since January 1, 2002, were separated from the Armed Forces after making an unrestricted report of sexual assault; (2) to determine the circumstances of and grounds for each such separation, including— (A) whether the separation was in retaliation for or influenced by the identified member making an unrestricted report of sexual assault; and (B) whether the identified member requested an appeal; and (3) if an identified member was separated on the grounds of having a personality or adjustment disorder, to determine whether the separation was carried out in compliance with Department of Defense Instruction 1332.14 and any other applicable Department of Defense regulations, directives, and policies. (b) Submission of results and recommendations Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the results of the review conducted under subsection (a), including such recommendations as the Inspector General of the Department of Defense considers necessary. 530C. Report on data and information collected in connection with Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces (a) Report required Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the specific results and data produced during the research programs, tests, surveys, consultant reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted to comply with the requirement of section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4217) to review laws, policies, and regulations that may restrict the service of female members of the Armed Forces. (b) Public availability Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall make the report required by subsection (a) publically available. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed as a request or authority for the Secretary of Defense to provide in the report required by subsection (a) any personal information that would identify, or violate the privacy of, members of the Armed Forces, including members who participated in the research programs, tests, surveys, reports, assessments, and similar projects conducted regarding the possible future assignments of female members of the Armed Forces. 530D. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) In February 2012, the Secretary of Defense notified Congress of the intent of the Secretary to rescind the co-location restriction and to implement policy exceptions to allow female members of the Armed Forces to be assigned to specified positions in ground combat units at the battalion level. (2) On January 24, 2013, the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued guidance to rescind the direct combat exclusion rule for female members of the Armed Forces and eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service in the Armed Forces. (3) The Secretaries of the military departments were required to develop and submit their plans for implementation of the rescission of the direct combat exclusion rule by May 15, 2013. (4) As of 2013, there are approximately 202,000 female members of the Armed Forces, approximately 20,000 female members have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and more than 60 female members have been killed in combat. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that the Secretaries of the military departments— (1) no later than September 2015, should develop, review, and validate individual occupational standards, using validated gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to assess and assign members of the Armed Forces to units, including Special Operations Forces; and (2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all assessments. 530E. Meetings with respect to religious liberty (a) Notice (1) In general The Department of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate advance written notice of any meeting to be held between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of writing, revising, issuing, implementing, enforcing, or seeking advice, input, or counsel regarding military policy related to religious liberty. (2) Contents of notice Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall include information on the time, date, location, and anticipated attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated the meeting. (3) Verbal notice If a meeting to which this subsection applies is scheduled less than 24 hours in advance of the meeting, the notice requirement under paragraph (1) may be satisfied by a phone call if Committee staff provide verbal confirmation of receipt of the notice. (b) Reports Not later than 72 hours after the conclusion of a meeting to which subsection (a) applies, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the meeting, which shall include information on the time, date, location, duration, and attendees of the meeting and information on who initiated the meeting. 530F. Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Section 207(b)(1) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527(b)(1)) is amended by inserting after calling the servicemember to military service the following: , or other appropriate indicator of military service, including a certified letter from a commanding officer or information from the Defense Manpower Database Center,. 530G. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools (a) Conditions on use of test, assessment, or screening tools In the case of any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment required by subsection (b) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose of identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, are required to meet the same standard on the test, assessment, or screening tool; and (2) use uniform testing requirements and grading standards. (b) Rule of construction Nothing in section 532(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department to create or use a different grading standard on any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized for the purpose of identifying graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces. 530H. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the Armed Forces Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report evaluating— (1) the use by the Secretaries of the military departments, since January 1, 2007, of the authority to separate members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces due of unfitness for duty because of a mental condition not amounting to disability, including separation on the basis of a personality disorder or adjustment disorder and the total number of members separated on such basis; (2) the extent to which the Secretaries failed to comply with regulatory requirements in separating members of the Armed Forces on the basis of a personality or adjustment disorder; and (3) the impact of such a separation on the ability of veterans so separated to access service-connected disability compensation, disability severance pay, and disability retirement pay. D Military Justice, Including Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 531. Limitations on convening authority discretion regarding court-martial findings and sentence (a) Elimination of unlimited command prerogative and discretion Paragraph (1) of section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking the first sentence. (b) Limitations on discretion regarding court-martial findings Paragraph (3) of section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended to read as follows: (3) (A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under this section is not required. (B) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts on the findings of a court-martial, the convening authority or other person may not— (i) dismiss any charge or specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting aside a finding of guilty thereto; or (ii) change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification. (C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts on the findings to dismiss or change any charge or specification for a qualifying offense, the convening authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon. (D) (i) In this paragraph, the term qualifying offense means, except in the case of an offense specified in clause (ii), an offense under this chapter for which— (I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be adjudged does not exceed two years; and (II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more than six months. (ii) Such term does not include the following: (I) An offense under section 920 of this title (article 120). (II) An offense under section 928 of this title (article 128), if such offense consisted of assault consummated by battery upon child under 16 years of age. (III) An offense under section 934 of this title (article 134), if such offense consisted of indecent language communicated to child under the age of 16 years. (IV) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may exclude by regulation. . (c) Limitations on discretion to modify an adjudged sentence Section 860(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2), by striking The convening authority and inserting the following: (B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening authority ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) (A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive discharge or disapprove, commute, or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement or a punitive discharge in whole or in part. (B) (i) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section shall have the authority to impose a sentence below a level established by statute as a minimum sentence, to impose a sentence of confinement below the adjudged confinement sentence, or to disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged sentence in whole or in part in recognition of the substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense. (ii) If a mandatory minimum sentence exists for a charge, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not modify an adjudged sentence to reduce the sentence to less than the mandatory minimum sentence or disapprove, commute, or suspend the adjudged mandatory minimum sentence in whole or in part. This limitation does not restrict the discretion of the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section to modify, disapprove, commute, or suspend any portion of the adjudged sentence that is in addition to the mandatory minimum sentence. (C) In addition, if a mandatory minimum sentence does not exist for a charge and a pre-trial agreement has been entered into by the convening authority and the accused, as authorized by Rule for Court-Martial 705, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may take action to reduce, dismiss, or suspend an adjudged sentence of confinement in whole or in part pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial agreement. . (d) Explanation for any decision disapproving, commuting, or suspending court-martial sentence Section 860(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by subsection (c)(1), is further amended— (1) by inserting (A) after (2); and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section acts to disapprove, commute, or suspend the sentence in whole or in part, the convening authority or other person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial and action thereon. . (e) Conforming amendment to other authority for convening authority to suspend sentence Section 871(d) of such title (article 71(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (c) of section 860 of this title (article 60) shall apply to any decision by the convening authority or such person to suspend the execution of any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.. (f) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to findings and sentences of courts-martial reported to convening authorities under section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by this section, on or after that effective date. 532. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes (a) Inclusion of additional offenses Section 843(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking rape, or rape of a child and inserting rape or sexual assault, or rape or sexual assault of a child. (b) Conforming amendment Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: , unless the offense is covered by subsection (a). (c) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to an offense covered by section 920(b) or 920b(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) that is committed on or after that date. 533. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of offenses by general courts-martial (a) Mandatory discharge or dismissal required (1) Imposition Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended— (A) by inserting (a) before The punishment; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) (1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a minimum, dismissal or dishonorable discharge. (2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses: (A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)). (B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 125). (C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80). . (2) Clerical amendments (A) Section heading The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits . (B) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item: 856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits. . (b) Jurisdiction limited to general courts-martial Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended— (1) by inserting (a) before the first sentence; (2) in the third sentence, by striking However, a general court-martial and inserting the following: (b) A general court-martial ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2)). . (c) Additional duties for independent panels (1) Response systems panel The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the appropriateness of statutorily mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section. (2) Judicial proceedings panel The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the implementation and effect of the mandatory minimum sentences established by section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a) of this section. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576. (d) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed after that date. 534. Regulations regarding consideration of application for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victims of sexual assault Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking The Secretaries of the military departments and inserting The Secretary concerned. 535. Consideration of need for, and authority to provide for, temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense (a) In general Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 673 the following new section: 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense (a) Guidance for timely consideration and action The Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active duty who is alleged to have committed a sexual assault or other sex-related offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, or 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose of maintaining good order and discipline within the member’s unit. (b) Time for determinations A determination described in subsection (a) may be made at any time after receipt of notification of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 673 the following new item: 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. . (c) Additional training requirement for commanders The Secretary of Defense shall provide for inclusion of information and discussion regarding the availability and use of the authority provided by section 674 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), as part of the training for new and prospective commanders at all levels of command required by section 585(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note). 536. Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses and related provisions (a) Designation and duties (1) In general Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1044d the following new section: 1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses (a) Designation; purposes The Secretary concerned shall designate legal counsel (to be known as Victims’ Counsel) for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted. (b) Types of legal assistance authorized The types of legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the following: (1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal liability of the victim stemming from or in relation to the circumstances surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and the victim’s right to seek military defense services. (2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness Assistance Program, including— (A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim; (B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between the victim and the liaison; and (C) the nature of communication made to the liaison in comparison to communication made to a Victims’ Counsel or a legal assistance attorney under section 1044 of this title. (3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim Advocate or domestic abuse advocate, to include any privileges that may exist regarding communications between those persons and the victim. (4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil litigation against other parties (other than the Department of Defense). (5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice system, including— (A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel, the defense counsel, and investigators; (B) any proceedings of the military justice process in which the victim may observe or participate as a witness or other party; (C) the Government’s authority to compel cooperation and testimony; and (D) the victim’s responsibility to testify, and other duties to the court. (6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in connection with the reporting, military investigation, and military prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense. (7) Legal consultation regarding— (A) services available from appropriate agencies or offices for emotional and mental health counseling and other medical services; (B) eligibility for and requirements for obtaining any available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional compensation benefits found in section 1059 of this title and other State and Federal victims’ compensation programs; and (C) the availability of, and any protections offered by, civilian and military restraining orders. (8) Legal consultation and assistance in personal civil legal matters in accordance with section 1044 of this title. (9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of Defense (or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) may authorize in the regulations prescribed under subsection (g). (c) Qualifications An individual may not be designated as a Victims’ Counsel under this section unless the individual— (1) meets the qualifications specified in section 1044(d)(2) of this title; and (2) is certified as competent to be designated as a Victims’ Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the Armed Force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which the civilian attorney is employed. (d) Administrative responsibility (1) Consistent with the regulations prescribed under subsection (g), the Judge Advocate General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the Marine Corps the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, is responsible for the establishment and supervision of individuals designated as Victims’ Counsel. (2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation of the Victims’ Counsel programs operated under this section. (e) Availability of victims’ counsel (1) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense shall be offered the option of receiving assistance from a Victims’ Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related offense or at the time the victim seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary concerned for purposes of this subsection. (2) The assistance of a Victims’ Counsel under this subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title regardless of whether the individual elects unrestricted or restricted reporting of the alleged sex-related offense. The individual shall also be informed that the assistance of a Victims’ Counsel may be declined, in whole or in part, but that declining such assistance does not preclude the individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a Victims’ Counsel. (f) Alleged sex-related offense defined In this section, the term alleged sex-related offense means any allegation of— (1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of ths title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or (2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (g) Regulations The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1044d the following new item: 1044e. Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses. . (3) Conforming amendments (A) Qualifications of persons providing legal assistance Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: and, for purposes of service as a Victims’ Counsel under section 1044e of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified in subsection (c)(2) of such section.. (B) Inclusion in definition of military legal assistance Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by striking and 1044d and inserting 1044d, 1044e, and 1565b(a)(1)(A). (C) Access to legal assistance and services Section 1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking section 1044 and inserting sections 1044 and 1044e. (4) Implementation Section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented within six months after the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Enhanced Training Requirement The Secretary of each military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy, shall implement, consistent with the guidelines provided under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), in-depth and advanced training for all military and civilian attorneys providing legal assistance under section 1044 or 1044e of such to support victims of alleged sex-related offenses. (c) Secretary of Defense implementation report (1) Report required Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will implement the requirements of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (2) Additional submission requirement The report required by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent review panel established by the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) and to the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice. (c) Additional duties for independent panels (1) Response systems panel The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of Victims’ Counsel to provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), to victims of alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to include legal standing to represent the victim during investigative and military justice proceedings in connection with the prosecution of the offense. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section. (2) Judicial proceedings panel The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment of the implementation and effect of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and make such recommendations for modification of such section 1044e as the panel considers appropriate. The panel shall include the results of the assessment and its recommendations in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576. 537. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking sexual harassment or and inserting rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment, or. 538. Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice process Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing— (1) an assessment of the current role and authorities of commanders in the administration of military justice and the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and (2) a recommendation by the Secretary of Defense regarding whether the role and authorities of commanders should be further modified or repealed. 539. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of sex-related offenses (a) Review Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the practices of the military criminal investigative organizations (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special Investigation) regarding the investigation of alleged sex-related offenses involving members of the Armed Forces, including the extent to which the military criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation of a sex-related offense appears founded or unfounded. (b) Policy After conducting the review required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform policy for the Armed Forces, to the extent practicable, regarding the use of case determinations to record the results of the investigation of a sex-related offense. In developing the policy, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility of adopting case determination methods, such as the uniform crime report, used by nonmilitary law enforcement agencies. (c) Sex-related offense defined In this section, the term sex-related offense includes— (1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or (2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 540. Uniform training and education programs for sexual assault prevention and response program Section 585(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in the first sentence, by striking Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall develop a curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response training and education for members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary and civilian employees of the military department and inserting Not later than June 30, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform curriculum to provide sexual assault prevention and response training and education for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense; and (B) in the second sentence, by inserting including lesson plans to achieve core competencies and learning objectives, after curriculum,; and (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by striking Consistent training.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure and inserting Uniform training.—The Secretary of Defense shall require; and (B) by striking consistent and inserting uniform. 541. Development of selection criteria for assignment as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent (a) Qualifications for assignment Section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431) is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); and (2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraphs: (A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, whether assigned to such duty on a full-time or part-time basis; (B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training, certification, and status of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the department assigned to duty as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; and . (b) Assignment of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent to Certain Military Units (1) Assignment to certain military units Section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended— (A) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): (c) Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent (1) Assignment requirements The Secretary of each military department shall assign at least one Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent unit level of each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary unless assignment to other units is determined to be more practicable and effective by the Secretary of Defense. The Secretary of the military department concerned may assign additional Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent as necessary based on the demographics or needs of a military unit. The Secretary of the military department concerned may waive the assignment requirement for a specific unit level if that Secretary determines that compliance will impose an undue burden, except that the Secretary shall notify Congress of each waiver and explain how compliance would impose an undue burden. (2) Eligible persons On and after October 1, 2015, only members of the armed forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent. The Secretary of the military department concerned may satisfy paragraph (1) through the assignment of additional personnel to a unit or by assigning the duties of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to current personnel of the unit, so long as such personnel meet the training and certification requirements of subsection (d). . (2) Training and certification Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A), is amended— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking assigned under subsection (a) and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates assigned under subsection (b) and inserting , Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent assigned under this section; (B) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: In the case of the curriculum and other components of the program for certification of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent, the Secretary of Defense shall utilize the most recent guidelines and standards as outlined by the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women, in the National Training Standards for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examiners.; and (C) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new sentence: On and after October 1, 2015, before a member or civilian employee may be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent under subsection (c), the member or employee must have completed the training program required by paragraph (1) and obtained the certification.. (c) Conforming amendments Section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1432) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting who satisfy the selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431) after Defense; and (2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting who satisfy the selection criteria established under section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 after Defense. (d) Clerical amendment The heading of section 584 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended to read as follows: 584. Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, Sexual Assault Victim Advocates, and Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners-Adult/Adolescent . 542. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (a) Victims' rights (1) In general Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new section (article): 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of victims of offenses under this chapter (a) Rights of a victim of a military crime A victim of a military crime has the following rights: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public proceeding in an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32), court-martial, involuntary plea hearing, pre-sentencing hearing, or parole hearing involving the offense or of any release or escape of the accused. (3) The right not to be excluded from any such public proceeding, referred to in paragraph (2) unless the military judge, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim of a military crime would be materially altered if the victim of a military crime heard other testimony at that proceeding. (4) The reasonable right to confer with the trial counsel in the case. (5) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law. (6) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. (7) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of a military crime. (b) Duty of military judge In any court-martial proceeding involving an offense against a victim of a military crime, the military judge shall ensure that the victim of a military crime is afforded the rights described in subsection (a). Before making a determination described in subsection (a)(3), the military judge shall make every effort to permit the fullest attendance possible by the victim of a military crime and shall consider reasonable alternatives to the exclusion of the victim of a military crime from the criminal proceeding. The reasons for any decision denying relief under this subsection shall be clearly stated on the record. (c) Best efforts required (1) Military judges, trial and defense counsel, military criminal investigation organizations, services, and personnel, and other members and personnel of the Department of Defense engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of offenses under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) shall make their best efforts to see that a victim of a military crime is notified of, and accorded, the rights described in subsection . (2) The trial counsel in a case shall advise a victim of a military crime that the victim of a military crime can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights described in subsection (a). (3) Notice of release otherwise required pursuant to this chapter shall not be given if such notice may endanger the safety of any person. (d) Victim of a military crime defined (1) Definition In this section, the term victim of a military crime means a person who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime in violation of this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or in violation of the law of another jurisdiction if any portion of the investigation of the violation of that law was conducted primarily by a military criminal investigative organization (Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, or Air Force Office of Special Investigation). The term shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) Members of the armed forces and their dependents. (B) Civilian employees of the Department of Defense and contractor employees stationed outside the continental United States and their dependents residing with them. (C) Such other individuals as the Secretary of Defense determines should be included. (2) Treatment of certain victims In the case of a victim of a military crime who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the term shall also include an individual acting on behalf of the victim who is (in order of precedence) a spouse, parent, legal guardian, child, sibling, or another dependent of the victim or another person designated by the military judge, but in no event shall an accused be designated or included. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 806b. Art. 6b. Victims' rights of victims of offenses under this chapter. . (b) Procedures To promote compliance (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the President changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial, and prescribe such other regulations as the Secretary considers appropriate, to implement section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a). (2) Elements The modifications and regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The designation of an administrative authority within the Department of Defense to oversee the implementation of such section 806(b), and within each Armed Force, an authority to receive and investigate complaints relating to the provision or violation of the rights of victims of military crimes. (B) A requirement for a course of training for judge advocates and other appropriate members of the Armed Forces and personnel of the Department to promote compliance with and implementation of such section 806b and assist such personnel in responding more effectively to the needs of victims of military crimes. (C) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense, including suspension or termination from employment in the case of employees of the Department, who willfully or wantonly fail to comply with such section 806b. (D) Mechanisms to ensure that the Secretary of Defense shall be the final arbiter of a complaint authorized pursuant to subparagraph (A) by a victim of a military crime that the victim was not afforded a right under such section 806b. (c) Additional duty for Response systems independent panel The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of section 3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the legal standing to seek enforcement of crime victim rights provided by subsection (d) of such section. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section. 543. Defense counsel interview of complaining witnesses in presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (1) by inserting (a) Opportunity To obtain witnesses and other evidence.—before The trial counsel; (2) by striking Process issued and inserting the following: (c) Process Process issued ; and (3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b): (b) Interview of complaining witnesses by defense counsel (1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel of the name and address of the complaining witness or witnesses trial counsel intends to call to testify in any portion of an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial under this chapter, defense counsel shall make all requests to interview any such complaining witness through trial counsel. (2) If requested by a complaining witness subject to a request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of the witness by defense counsel shall take place only in the presence of counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. (3) In this subsection, the term complaining witness means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). . 544. Participation by complaining witnesses in clemency phase of courts-martial process Section 860(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— (1) by inserting (A) after (b)(1); (2) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively, and, in such subparagraphs as so redesignated, by striking paragraph (1) each place it appears and inserting subparagraph (A); and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (2) (A) In any case in which findings and sentence have been adjudged for an offense involving a complaining witness, the complaining witness shall be provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under this section before the convening authority or such other person takes action under this section. Such a submission shall be made within 10 days after the complaining witness has been given an authenticated record of trial and, if applicable, the recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal officer under subsection (d). (B) If a complaining witness shows that additional time is required for submission of matters under subparagraph (A), the convening authority or other person taking action under this section, for good cause, may extend the submission period for not more than an additional 20 days. (C) In this paragraph, the term complaining witness means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). (3) The convening authority shall not consider under this section any submitted matters that go to the character of a complaining witness unless such matters were presented at the trial. . 545. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed Forces (a) Incident reporting policy requirement The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to require the submission by a designated person of a written incident report not later than eight days after an unrestricted report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of the Armed Forces is the victim. At a minimum, this incident report shall be provided to the following: (1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred on or in the vicinity of a military installation. (2) The first officer in the grade of 0–6 in the chain of command of the victim. (3) The first general officer or flag officer in the chain of command of the victim. (b) Purpose of the report The purpose of the required incident report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or in progress to provide the necessary care and support to the victim of the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to the appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide initial notification of the serious incident when that notification has not already taken place. (c) Elements of report (1) In general The report of an incident under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) Time/Date/Location of incident. (B) Type of offense allegation. (C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the victim. (D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the alleged offender, including information regarding whether the alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed from an assigned billet or ordered to pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted, if applicable. (E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the incident, including the following: (i) Referral of the victim to medical services and all other services available for members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual assault, including the date of each such referral. (ii) Receipt and processing status of a request for expedited victim transfer, if applicable. (iii) Notification of incident to appropriate investigatory offices, including the organization notified and date of such notification. (iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in connection with the incident. (2) Modification (A) In general The Secretary of Defense may modify the elements required in a report under this section regarding an incident involving a member of the Armed Forces (including the Coast Guard when it is operating as service in the Department of the Navy) if the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate compliance with best practices for such reporting as identified by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office of the Department of Defense. (B) Coast Guard The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may modify the elements required in a report under this section regarding an incident involving a member of the Coast Guard if the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate compliance with best practices for such reporting as identified by the Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs. (3) For official use only A report under this section shall be intended for official use only and shall not be distributed beyond the requirements listed above. (d) Regulations Not later than 180 days after enactment, The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. 546. Amendment to Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate considerations relating to character and military service of accused in initial disposition of sex-related offenses (a) Amendment required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the President a proposed amendment to rule 306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial (relating to policy on initial disposition of offenses) to eliminate the character and military service of the accused from the list of factors that may be considered by the disposition authority in disposing of a sex-related offense. (b) Sex-related offense defined In this section, a sex-related offense includes— (1) any offense covered by section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); or (2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph (1) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 547. Inclusion of letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of reprimands and counseling statements (a) Inclusion in performance evaluation reports The Secretary of Defense shall require commanders to include letter of reprimands, nonpunitive letter of actions and counseling statements involving substantiated cases of sexual harassment or sexual assault in the performance evaluation report of a member of the Armed Forces for the purpose of— (1) providing commanders increased visibility of the background information of members of the unit; (2) identifying and preventing trends of bad behavior early and effectively disciplining repeated actions which hinder units from fostering a healthy climate; and (3) preventing the transfer of sexual offenders. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) The term sexual harassment has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program. (2) The term sexual assault means any of the offenses described in section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 548. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training (a) Defining inappropriate and prohibited relationships, communication, conduct, and contact between certain members (1) Policy required The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to uniformly define and prescribe, for the persons described in paragraph (2), what constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an action is consensual, between a member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or member of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B). (2) Covered members The policy required by paragraph (1) shall apply to— (A) a member of the Armed Forces who is superior in rank to, exercises authority or control over, or supervises a person described in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level processing or training of the person; and (B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a member of the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing or training. (3) Inclusion of certain members required The members of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall include, at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached to duty— (A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons for enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, warrant officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces; (B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or (C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an Armed Force. (b) Effect of violations A member of the Armed Forces who violates the policy established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. (c) Processing for administrative separation (1) In general (A) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall require the processing for administrative separation of any member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated violation by the member of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a), when the member is not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed from the Armed Forces for that violation. (B) The Secretary of each military department shall revise regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary as necessary to ensure compliance with the requirement under subparagraph (A). (2) Required elements (A) In imposing the requirement under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces is based on the full facts of the case and that due process procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the Secretaries, pursuant to subsection (f). (B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not be interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to process members of the Armed Forces for administrative separation— (i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a); or (ii) under other provisions of law or regulation. (3) Substantiated violation For purposes of paragraph (1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described in subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy established pursuant to subsection (a) shall be treated as substantiated if— (A) there has been a court-martial conviction for violation of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not include discharge or dismissal; or (B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) has determined that a member has committed an offense in violation of the policy and imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the member. (d) Proposed Uniform Code of Military Justice punitive article Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives— (1) a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) to create an additional article under subchapter X of such chapter regarding violations of the policy required by subsection (a); and (2) the conforming changes to part IV, punitive articles, in the Manual for Courts-Martial that will be necessary upon adoption of such article. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term entry-level processing or training, with respect to a member of the Armed forces, means the period beginning on the date on which the member became a member of the Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the member physically arrives at that member’s first duty assignment following completion of initial entry training (or its equivalent), as defined by the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating. (2) The term prospective member of the Armed Forces means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member of the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person eventually becomes a member of the Armed Forces. (f) Regulations Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the extent practicable, the regulations are uniform for each armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary. 549. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases (a) Additional duties for response systems panel regarding disposition authority (1) In general The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall— (A) conduct an assessment of the impact, if any, that removing from the chain of command any disposition authority regarding charges preferred under the Uniform Code of Military Justice would have on overall reporting and prosecution of sexual assault cases; and (B) review and provide comment on the report of the Secretary of Defense on the role of military commanders in the military justice process, which is required pursuant to section 538 of this Act. (2) Submission of results The panel shall include the results of the assessment and review and its recommendations and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section. (b) Earlier submission deadline for report of the response systems panel Subsection (c) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph: (1) Response systems panel Not later than one year after the date of the first meeting of the panel established under subsection (a)(1), the panel shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations, through the Secretary of Defense, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The panel shall terminate 30 days after submission of such report. . (c) Additional duty for response systems panel regarding instances of members’ abusing chain of command position to gain access to or coerce another person for a sex-related offense (1) In general The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall conduct an assessment of instances in the Armed Forces in which a member of the Armed Forces has committing a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the other person to gain access to or coerce the other person. (2) Submission of results The panel shall include the results of the assessment and its recommendations and comments in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of such section 576, as amended by subsection (b) of this section. (d) Additional duty for judicial proceedings panel regarding additional revision of definition of Article 120 sex-related offenses The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) shall assess the likely consequences of amending of definition of rape and sexual assault under article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expressly cover a situation in which a person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the other person to gain access to or coerce the other person. The panel shall include the results of the assessment in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) of such section 576. 550. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (a) Review required The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection (b). (b) Elements of study In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps in the Office; (2) identify and evaluate the role of the Office in sexual harassment cases; and (3) evaluate how the Office works with the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office to address sexual harassment in the Armed Forces. (c) Definition In this section, the term sexual harassment has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program. 550A. Discharge or dismissal, and confinement required for certain sex-related offenses committed by members of the Armed Forces (a) Mandatory punishments (1) Imposition Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended— (A) by inserting (a) before The punishment; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) (1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a minimum— (A) dismissal or dishonorable discharge; and (B) confinement for two years. (2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses: (A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 (article 120(a) or (b)). (B) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 125). (C) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) or (B) that is punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80). . (2) Clerical amendments (A) Section heading The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits . (B) Table of sections The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item: 856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed after that date. 550B. Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources (a) Required posting of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources (1) Posting The Secretary of Defense shall require that there be prominently posted, in accordance with paragraph (2), notice of the following information relating to sexual assault prevention and response, in a form designed to ensure visibility and understanding: (A) Resource information for members of the Armed Forces, military dependents, and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense with respect to prevention of sexual assault and reporting of incidents of sexual assault. (B) Contact information for personnel who are designated as Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. (C) The Department of Defense hotline telephone number, referred to as the Safe Helpline, for reporting incidents of sexual assault, or any successor operation. (2) Posting placement Posting under subsection (a) shall be at the following locations, to the extent practicable: (A) Any Department of Defense duty facility. (B) Any Department of Defense dining facility. (C) Any Department of Defense multi-unit residential facility. (D) Any Department of Defense health care facility. (E) Any Department of Defense commissary or exchange. (F) Any Department of Defense Community Service Agency. (G) Any Department of Defense website. (b) Notice to victims of available assistance The Secretary of Defense shall require that procedures in the Department of Defense for responding to a complaint or allegation of sexual assault submitted by or against a member of the Armed Forces include prompt notice to the person making the complaint or allegation of the forms of assistance available to that person from the Department of Defense and, to the extent known to the Secretary, through other departments and agencies, including State and local agencies, and other sources. 550C. Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel (a) Establishment There is established a panel to be known as the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel (in this section referred to as the Panel). (b) Membership The Panel shall be composed of the following members: (1) The Secretary of the Army or the Secretary’s designee. (2) The Secretary of the Navy or the Secretary’s designee. (3) The Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary’s designee. (4) The Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast Guard) or the Secretary’s designee. (5) Members appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among individuals who are not officers or employees of any government and who have expertise in advocating for— (A) women; (B) racial or ethnic minorities; (C) religious minorities; or (D) gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender individuals. (c) Duties The Panel shall— (1) make recommendations to the Secretary concerned (as defined in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code) on the development of the policies, programs, and procedures to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces; and (2) monitor any policies, programs, and procedures in place to prevent and respond to hazing in the Armed Forces and make recommendations to the Secretary concerned on ways to improve such policies, programs, and procedures. (d) Initial Meeting Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Panel shall hold its initial meeting. (e) Meetings The Panel shall meet not less than annually. 550D. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each of the military service academies adds a section in the ethics curricula of such academies that outlines honor, respect, and character development as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula shall include a brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the Armed Forces, a definition of sexual assault, information relating to reporting a sexual assault, victims’ rights, and dismissal and dishonorable discharge for offenders. Such ethics training shall be provided within 60 days after the initial arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at a military services academy and repeated in annual ethics training requirements. 550E. Ensuring awareness of policy to instruct victims of sexual assault seeking security clearance to answer no to question 21 (a) Ensuring awareness of policy The Secretary of Defense shall inform members of the United States Armed Forces of the policy described in subsection (b)— (1) at the earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment and commissioning; and (2) during sexual assault awareness training and service member interactions with sexual assault response coordinators. (b) Policy described The policy described in this subsection is the policy of instructing an individual to answer no to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a health care professional if— (1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and (2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional or mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual assault. 550F. Report on policies and regulations regarding service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV (a) Report to Congress Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report on the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations with regard to service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV. (b) Contents The report shall include the following: (1) An assessment of whether the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations are exercised in a way that demonstrates an evidence-based, medically accurate understanding of— (A) the multiple factors that lead to HIV transmission; (B) the relative risk of HIV transmission routes; (C) the associated benefits of treatment and support services for people living with HIV; and (D) the impact of HIV-specific policies and regulations on public health and on people living with or at risk of contracting HIV. (2) A review of court-martial decisions in recent years preceding the date of enactment of this Act. (3) Recommendations for adjustments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations, as may be necessary, in order to ensure that policies and regulations regarding service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV are in accordance with a contemporary understanding of HIV transmission routes and associated benefits of treatment. (c) Definition of HIV In this section, the term HIV means infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. 550G. Additional modification of annual Department of Defense reporting requirements regarding sexual assaults and prevention and response program (a) Additional elements of each report Section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: (11) A description of the implementation of the comprehensive policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to comply with section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note). (12) The policies, procedures, and processes implemented by the Secretary concerned to ensure detailed evidence and records are transmitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs, including medical records of sexual assault victims that accurately and completely describe the physical and emotional injuries resulting from a sexual trauma that occurred during active duty service. . (b) Application of amendments The amendment made by this section shall apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2014, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. E Military Family Readiness 551. Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones (a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1126 the following new section: 1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation (a) Design and eligibility A lapel button, to be known as the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the spouse of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days. (b) Presentation The Secretary concerned may authorize the use of appropriated funds to procure spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation to eligible spouses of members. (c) Exception to time-period requirement The 30-day period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the expiration the period. (d) License to manufacture and sell lapel buttons Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this section. (e) Combat zone defined In this section, the term combat zone has the meaning given that term in section 112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (f) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable. . (b) Clerical Amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1126 the following new item: 1126a. Spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation. . (c) Sense of congress regarding implementation It is the sense of Congress that, as soon as practicable once the spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button becomes available, the Secretary of Defense should— (1) widely announce the availability of spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons through military and public information channels; and (2) encourage commanders at all levels to conduct ceremonies recognizing the support provided by spouses of members of the Armed Forces and to use the ceremonies as an opportunity for members to present their spouses with a spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button. 552. Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members of the Armed Forces (a) Child custody protection Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 208. Child custody protection (a) Restriction on temporary custody order If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, then the court shall require that, upon the return of the servicemember from deployment, the custody order that was in effect immediately preceding the temporary order shall be reinstated, unless the court finds that such a reinstatement is not in the best interest of the child, except that any such finding shall be subject to subsection (b). (b) Limitation on consideration of member’s deployment in determination of Child’s Best Interest If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child. (c) No federal jurisdiction or right of action or removal Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal. (d) Preemption In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard. (e) Deployment Defined In this section, the term deployment means the movement or mobilization of a servicemember to a location for a period of longer than 60 days and not longer than 540 days pursuant to temporary or permanent official orders— (1) that are designated as unaccompanied; (2) for which dependent travel is not authorized; or (3) that otherwise do not permit the movement of family members to that location. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title II the following new item: 208. Child custody protection. . 553. Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing (a) In general Title III of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act is amended by inserting after section 303 (50 U.S.C. App. 533) the following new section: 303A. Treatment of relocation of servicemembers for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing (a) Treatment of absence from residence due to active duty While a servicemember who is the mortgagor under an existing mortgage does not reside in the residence that secures the existing mortgage because of a relocation described in subsection (c)(1)(B), if the servicemember inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage, the servicemember shall be considered, for all purposes relating to the covered refinancing mortgage (including such inquiry or application and eligibility for, and compliance with, any underwriting criteria and standards regarding such covered refinancing mortgage) to occupy the residence that secures the existing mortgage to be paid or prepaid by such covered refinancing mortgage as the principal residence of the servicemember during the period of such relocation. (b) Limitation Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a servicemember who inquires about or applies for a covered refinancing mortgage if, during the 5-year period preceding the date of such inquiry or application, the servicemember entered into a covered refinancing mortgage pursuant to this section. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Existing mortgage The term existing mortgage means a mortgage that is secured by a 1- to 4-family residence, including a condominium or a share in a cooperative ownership housing association, that was the principal residence of a servicemember for a period that— (A) had a duration of 13 consecutive months or longer; and (B) ended upon the relocation of the servicemember caused by the servicemember receiving military orders for a permanent change of station or to deploy with a military unit, or as an individual in support of a military operation, for a period of not less than 18 months that did not allow the servicemember to continue to occupy such residence as a principal residence. (2) Covered refinancing mortgage The term covered refinancing mortgage means any mortgage that— (A) is made for the purpose of paying or prepaying, and extinguishing, the outstanding obligations under an existing mortgage or mortgages; and (B) is secured by the same residence that secured such existing mortgage or mortgages. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 303 the following new item: 303A. Treatment of relocation of servicemembers for active duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing. . 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces (a) Pilot programs authorized Consistent with such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to carry out this section, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities for the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. (b) Selection of programs In selecting the pilot programs to be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall— (1) identify family support activities that have a direct and concrete impact on the readiness of special operations forces, but that are not being provided to the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces by the Secretary of a military department; and (2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support activity proposed to be included in a pilot program. (c) Evaluation The Commander shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of each family support activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a). (d) Additional authority The Commander may expend up to $5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection (f) to carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a). (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term Commander means the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command. (2) The term immediate family members has the meaning given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States Code. (3) The term special operations forces means those forces of the Armed Forces identified as special operations forces under section 167(i) of such title. (f) Duration of pilot program authority The authority provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander during fiscal years 2014 through 2016. (g) Report Not later than 180 days after completing a pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program. 555. Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from military to civilian life (a) Findings The Congress finds the following: (1) Members of the Armed Forces and their families make great sacrifices on behalf of the United States, and, when their active duty service is successfully concluded, members deserve the opportunity to also make a successful transition to the civilian labor force. (2) When transitioning from active duty in the Armed Forces to civilian employment, members often face barriers that make it difficult to fully utilize the skills and training they gained during their military service. (3) Members and veterans are too often required to repeat education or training in order to receive industry certifications and State occupational licenses, even though their military training and experience often overlaps with the certification or licensing requirements. (4) When members are transferred from military assignment to military assignment, their spouses often face barriers to transferring their credentials and to securing employment in their new location. (5) More than one million members will make the transition to civilian life in the coming years. (6) The Department of Defense established the Military Credentialing and Licensing Task Force in 2012. (7) The Joining Forces program, a national initiative to mobilize all sectors of society to give members of the Armed Forces and their families the opportunities and support they have earned, will make it easier for members and their families to transfer skills learned while the member was serving in the Armed Forces to civilian employment. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Federal Government and State governments should make the transition of a member of the Armed Forces and the member's spouse from military to civilian life as seamless as possible by creating opportunities for the member and spouse to earn, while the member is in the Armed Forces, civilian occupational credentials and licenses, with an emphasis on well-paying industries and occupations that have a high demand for skilled workers, including: manufacturing, information technology, transportation and logistics, health care, and emergency medical services; (2) the Federal Government should assist State governments in translating military training and experience into credit towards professional licensure; and (3) State governments should streamline approaches for assessing the equivalency of military training and experience, and accelerate occupational licensing processes for members, veterans, and their spouses. 556. Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (a) Members of the Armed Forces, surviving spouses, and certain disabled veterans (1) In general Title III of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 303A, as added by section 553, the following new section: 303B. Mortgages and trust deeds of certain servicemembers, surviving spouses, and disabled veterans (a) Mortgage as Security This section applies only to an obligation on real or personal property owned by a covered individual that— (1) originated at any time and for which the covered individual is still obligated; and (2) is secured by a mortgage, trust deed, or other security in the nature of a mortgage. (b) Stay of Proceedings (1) In general In accordance with subsection (d)(1), in a judicial action pending or in a nonjudicial action commenced during a covered time period to enforce an obligation described in subsection (a), a court— (A) may, after a hearing and on its own motion, stay the proceedings until the end of the covered time period; and (B) shall, upon application by a covered individual, stay the proceedings until the end of the covered time period. (2) Obligation to stop proceedings Upon receipt of notice provided under subsection (d)(1), a mortgagee, trustee, or other creditor seeking to foreclose on real property secured by an obligation covered by this section using any judicial or nonjudicial proceedings shall immediately stop any such proceeding until the end of the covered time period. (c) Sale or Foreclosure A sale, judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure of property for a breach of an obligation described in subsection (a) that is not stayed under subsection (b) shall not be valid during a covered time period except— (1) upon a court order granted before such sale, judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, or seizure with a return made and approved by the court; or (2) if made pursuant to an agreement as provided in section 107. (d) Notice required (1) In general To be covered under this section, a covered individual shall provide to the mortgagee, trustee, or other creditor written notice that such individual is so covered. (2) Manner Written notice under paragraph (1) may be provided electronically. (3) Time Notice provided under paragraph (1) shall be provided during the covered time period. (4) Contents With respect to a servicemember described in subsection (g)(1)(A), notice shall include— (A) a copy of the servicemember’s official military orders, or any notification, certification, or verification from a servicemember's commanding officer that provides evidence of servicemember's eligibility for special pay as described in subsection (g)(1)(A); or (B) an official notice using a form designed under paragraph (5). (5) Official forms (A) In general The Secretary of Defense shall design and distribute an official Department of Defense form that can be used by an individual to give notice under paragraph (1). (B) Use of official form not required Failure by any individual to use a form designed or distributed under subparagraph (A) to provide notice shall not make such provision of notice invalid. (e) Aggregate duration The aggregate duration for which a covered individual (except a servicemember described in subsection (g)(1)(A)) may be covered under this section is one year. (f) Misdemeanor A person who knowingly makes or causes to be made a sale, foreclosure, or seizure of property that is prohibited by subsection (c), or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered individual The term covered individual means the following individuals: (A) A servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a period of military service. (B) A servicemember placed on convalescent status, including a servicemember transferred to the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States Code. (C) A veteran who was medically discharged and retired under chapter 61 of title 10, United States Code, except for a veteran described in section 1207 of such title. (D) A surviving spouse (as defined in section 101(3) of title 38, United States Code, and in accordance with section 103 of such title) of a servicemember who died while in military service if such spouse is the successor in interest to property covered under subsection (a). (2) Covered time period The term covered time period means the following time periods: (A) With respect to a servicemember who is or was eligible for hostile fire or imminent danger special pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, during a period of military service, during the period beginning on the first day on which the servicemember is or was eligible for such special pay during such period of military service and ending on the date that is one year after the last day of such period of military service. (B) With respect to a servicemember described in paragraph (1)(B), during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the servicemember is placed on convalescent status or transferred to the temporary disability retired list under section 1202 or 1205 of title 10, United States Code. (C) With respect to a veteran described in paragraph (1)(C), during the one-year period beginning on the date of the retirement of such veteran. (D) With respect to a surviving spouse of a servicemember as described in paragraph (1)(D), during the one-year period beginning on the date on which the spouse receives notice of the death of the servicemember. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 303 the following new item: Sec. 303B. Mortgages and trust deeds of certain servicemembers, surviving spouses, and disabled veterans. . (3) Conforming amendment Section 107 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 517) is amended by adding at the end the following: (e) Other individuals For purposes of this section, the term servicemember includes any covered individual under section 303B. . (b) Increased civil penalties for mortgage violations Paragraph (3) of section 801(b) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 597(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows: (3) to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty— (A) with respect to a violation of section 207, 303, or 303B regarding real property— (i) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for a first violation; and (ii) in an amount not exceeding $220,000 for any subsequent violation; and (B) with respect to any other violation of this Act— (i) in an amount not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation; and (ii) in an amount not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation. . (c) Credit discrimination Section 108 of such Act (50 U.S.C. App. 518) is amended— (1) by striking Application by and inserting (a) Application or receipt.—Application by; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Eligibility In addition to the protections under subsection (a), an individual who is entitled to any right or protection provided under this Act may not be denied or refused credit or be subject to any other action described under paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) solely by reason of such entitlement. . (d) Requirements for lending institutions that are creditors for obligations and liabilities covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act Section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 527) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): (d) Lending institution requirements (1) Compliance officers Each lending institution subject to the requirements of this section shall designate an employee of the institution as a compliance officer who is responsible for ensuring the institution’s compliance with this section and for distributing information to servicemembers whose obligations and liabilities are covered by this section. (2) Toll-free telephone number During any fiscal year, a lending institution subject to the requirements of this section that had annual assets for the preceding fiscal year of $10,000,000,000 or more shall maintain a toll-free telephone number and shall make such telephone number available on the primary Internet website of the institution. . (e) Pension for certain veterans covered by medicaid plans for services furnished by nursing facilities Section 5503(d)(7) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking November 30, 2016 and inserting March 1, 2017. (f) Effective date Section 303B of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, as added by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section (other than the amendment made by subsection (e)), shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 557. Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the Armed Forces who serve in combat zones (a) Establishment and Presentation of Lapel Buttons Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1126 the following new section: 1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation (a) Design and eligibility A lapel button, to be known as the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, shall be designed, as approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the dependent of a member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days. (b) Presentation The Secretary concerned may authorize the use of appropriated funds to procure dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel buttons and to provide for their presentation to eligible dependents of members. (c) Exception to time-period requirement The 30-day period specified in subsection (a) does not apply if the member is killed or wounded in the combat zone before the expiration the period. (d) License to manufacture and sell lapel buttons Section 901(c) of title 36 shall apply with respect to the dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button authorized by this section. (e) Combat zone defined In this section, the term combat zone has the meaning given that term in section 112(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (f) Regulations The Secretary of Defense shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the regulations are uniform for each armed force to the extent practicable. . (b) Clerical Amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1126 the following new item: 1126b. Dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button: eligibility and presentation. . F Education and Training Opportunities and Wellness 561. Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program Section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) If a secondary educational institution in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau otherwise meets the conditions imposed by subsection (b) on the establishment and maintenance of units of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, the Secretary of a military department may establish and maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps at the secondary educational institution even though the secondary educational institution is not a United States secondary educational institution. . 562. Improved climate assessments and dissemination and tracking of results (a) Improved dissemination of results in chain of command The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the results of command climate assessments are provided to the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of command. (b) Performance tracking (1) Evidence of compliance The Secretary of each military department shall include in the performance evaluations and assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary a designated form where senior commanders can indicate whether the commander has conducted the required climate assessments. (2) Effect of failure to conduct assessment If a commander is found to not have conducted the required climate assessments, the failure shall be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation and be considered a serious factor during consideration for any subsequent promotion. (c) Tracking system The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall develop a system to track whether commanders are conducting command climate assessments. (d) Unit compliance reports Working with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, unit commanders shall gather all the climate assessments from the unit and develop a compliance report that, at a minimum, shall include the following: (1) A comprehensive overview of the concerns members of the unit expressed in the climate assessments. (2) Data showing how leadership is perceived in the unit. (3) A detailed strategic plan on how leadership plans to address the expressed concerns. 563. Service-wide 360 assessments (a) Adoption of 360-degree approach The Secretary of each military department shall develop an assessment program modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program, known in this section as the 360-degree approach. (b) Report on inclusion in performance evaluation reports Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of an assessment of the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as part of the performance evaluation reports. (c) Individual counseling The Secretary of each military department shall include individual counseling as part of the performance evaluation process. 564. Health welfare inspections The Secretary of each military department shall conduct health welfare inspections on a monthly basis in order to ensure and maintain security, military readiness, good order, and discipline of all units of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. Results of the Health Welfare Inspections shall be provided to both the commander and senior commander. 565. Review of security of military installations, including barracks and multi-family residences (a) Review of security measures The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of security measures on United States military installations, specifically with regard to barracks and multi-family residences on military installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents who reside on military installations. (b) Elements of study In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) identify security gaps on military installations; and (2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24-hour electronic monitoring or placing security personnel at all points of entry into barracks and multi-family residences on military installation. (c) Submission of results Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), including an estimate of the costs— (1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under subsection (b)(1); and (2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring as evaluated under subsection (b)(2). 566. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses (a) Improvement of information available to members of the Armed Forces about correlation (1) In general The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make information on civilian credentialing opportunities available to members of the Armed Forces beginning with, and at every stage of, training of members for military occupational specialties, in order to permit members— (A) to evaluate the extent to which such training correlates with the skills and training required in connection with various civilian certifications and licenses; and (B) to assess the suitability of such training for obtaining or pursuing such civilian certifications and licenses. (2) Coordination with Transition Goals Plans Success program Information shall be made available under paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals Plans Success (GPS) program. (3) Types of information The information made available under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents of military occupational specialties (MOS). (B) Information on civilian license or certification requirements, including examination requirements. (C) Information on the availability and opportunities for use of educational benefits available to members of the Armed Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or continuing education that leads to a certification exam in order to provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities. (4) Use and adaptation of certain programs In making information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of the military departments may use and adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL) programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force. (b) Improvement of access of accredited civilian credentialing agencies to military training content (1) In general The Secretaries of the military departments, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable consistent with national security requirements, make available to accredited civilian credentialing agencies that issue certifications or licenses, upon request of such agencies, information such as military course training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed. (2) Central repository The actions taken pursuant to paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central repository of information on training and training materials provided members in connection with military occupational specialities that is readily accessible by accredited civilian credentialing agencies described in that paragraph in order to meet requests described in that paragraph. 567. Use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses (a) Courses under Department of Defense educational assistance authorities (1) In general Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2015 the following new section: 2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses (a) Limitation on use of assistance In the case of a member of the armed forces who is enrolled in an educational institution in a State for purposes of obtaining employment in an occupation or profession requiring the approval or licensure of a board or agency of that State, educational assistance specified in subsection (b) may be used by the member for a course offered by the educational institution that is a required element of the curriculum to be satisfied to obtain employment in that occupation or profession only if— (1) the successful completion of the curriculum fully qualifies a student to— (A) take any examination required for entry into the occupation or profession, including satisfying any State or professionally mandated programmatic and specialized accreditation requirements; and (B) be certified or licensed or meet any other academically related pre-conditions that are required for entry into the occupation or profession; and (2) in the case of State licensing or professionally mandated requirements for entry into the occupation or profession that require specialized accreditation, the curriculum meets the requirement for specialized accreditation through its accreditation or pre-accreditation by an accrediting agency or association recognized by the Secretary of Education or designated by that State as a reliable authority as to the quality or training offered by the institution in that program. (b) Covered educational assistance The educational assistance specified in this subsection is educational assistance as follows: (1) Educational assistance for members of the armed forces under section 2007 and 2015 of this title. (2) Educational assistance for persons enlisting for active duty under chapter 106A of this title. (3) Educational assistance for members of the armed forces held as captives under section 2183 of this title. (4) Educational assistance for members of the Selected Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title. (5) Educational assistance for reserve component members supporting contingency operations and other operations under chapter 1607 of this title. (6) Such other educational assistance provided members of the armed force under the laws the administered by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretaries of the military departments as the Secretary of Defense shall designate for purposes of this section. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2015 the following new item: 2015a. Civilian certifications and licenses: use of educational assistance for courses in pursuit of civilian certifications or licenses. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on August 1, 2014, and shall apply with respect to courses pursued on or after that date. 568. Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members of the Armed Forces The Secretary of each military department shall carry out tuition assistance programs for members of an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary during fiscal year 2014 using an amount not less than the sum of any amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for tuition assistance for members of that Armed Force for fiscal year 2014. 569. Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps serving in combat zones (a) Provision of internet access requirement The Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who are deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay or hazardous duty pay is authorized under section 310 or 351 of title 37, United States Code, have reasonable access to the Internet in order to permit the members— (1) to engage in video-conferencing and other communication with their families and friends; and (2) to enjoy the educational and recreational capabilities of the Internet via websites approved by the Secretary concerned. (b) Waiver authority The Secretary of a military department may waive the requirement imposed by subsection (a) for an area, or for certain time periods in an area, if the Secretary determines that the security environment of the area does not reasonably allow for recreational Internet use. (c) No charge for access and use Internet access and use shall be provided to members under this section without charge. (d) Effective date The requirement imposed by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2014. 570. Report on the Troops to Teachers program Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the Troops to Teachers program that includes each of the following: (1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a bachelor’s degree admission into the program and whether the program can be strengthened. (2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an institutional based award for troops to teachers, as long as any such pilot maximizes benefits to soldiers and minimizes administrative and other overhead costs at the participating academic institutions. 570A. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members of the Armed Forces Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to Congress a report addressing the following: (1) Whether application of the benefits provided under section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) could occur automatically for members of the Armed Forces eligible for the benefits. (2) How the Department of Defense would implement the automatic operation of the current prohibition on the accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members, including the Federal agencies with which the Department of Defense would coordinate. (3) If the Secretary determines that automatic operation is not feasible, an explanation of the reasons for that determination. G Defense Dependents’ Education 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $20,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b). (b) Assistance to schools with enrollment changes due to base closures, force structure changes, or force relocations (1) Extension of authority to provide assistance Section 572(b)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b(b)(4)) is amended by striking September 30, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2015. (2) Amount of assistance authorized Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (b) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b). (c) Local educational agency defined In this section, the term local educational agency has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 572. Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition of military dependent students The Secretary of Defense may make grants to nonprofit organizations that provide services to improve the academic achievement of military dependent students, including those nonprofit organizations whose programs focus on improving the civic responsibility of military dependent students and their understanding of the Federal Government through direct exposure to the operations of the Federal Government. 573. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program (a) Crediting of payments Section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense under this subsection shall be credited to the account designated by the Secretary for the operation of the virtual educational program under this subsection. Payments so credited shall be merged with other funds in the account and shall be available, to the extent provided in advance in appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the same period as other funds in the account. . (b) Application of amendment The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition payments received under section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, for enrollments authorized by such section, after the date of the enactment of this Act, in the virtual elementary and secondary education program of the Department of Defense education program. H Decorations and Awards 581. Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or medals (a) In general Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking wears,; and (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: (b) Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or medals Whoever, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both. . (b) Addition of certain other medals Section 704(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking If a decoration and inserting the following: (1) In general If a decoration ; (2) by inserting a combat badge, after 1129 of title 10,; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Combat badge defined In this subsection, the term combat badge means a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, Combat Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Combat Action Medal. . (c) Conforming amendment Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by striking or (b). 582. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces (a) Army Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking medal of honor, distinguished-service cross, and inserting distinguished-service cross. (b) Navy and marine corps Section 6247 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking medal of honor,. (c) Air force Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking medal of honor, Air Force cross, and inserting Air Force Cross. 583. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal (a) Army Section 3744(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking three years and inserting five years; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking two years and inserting three years. (b) Air force Section 8744(b) of such title is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking three years and inserting five years; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking two years and inserting three years. 584. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements (a) Automatic enrollment and furnishing of certificate (1) In general Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1134 the following new section: 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll (a) Establishment There shall be in the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air Force, and the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating a roll designated as the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll. (b) Enrollment The Secretary concerned shall enter and record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active duty in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of honor pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title or section 491 of title 14. (c) Issuance of enrollment certificate Each living person whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a certificate of enrollment on the roll. (d) Entitlement to special pension; notice to secretary of Veterans Affairs The Secretary concerned shall deliver to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each certificate of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The copy of the certificate shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay the special pension provided by section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in the certificate. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1134 the following new item: 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll. . (b) Special pension (1) Automatic entitlement Subsection (a) of section 1562 of title 38, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking each person and inserting each living person; (B) by striking Honor roll and inserting Honor Roll; (C) by striking subsection (c) of section 1561 of this title and inserting subsection (d) of section 1134a of title 10; and (D) by striking date of application therefor under section 1560 of this title and inserting date on which the person’s name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b) of such section. (2) Election to decline special pension Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) A person who is entitled to special pension under subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by notifying the Secretary of such election in writing. (2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary shall cease payments of special pension to the person. . (c) Conforming amendments (1) Repeal of recodified provisions Sections 1560 and 1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed. (2) Clerical amendments The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking the items relating to sections 1560 and 1561. (d) Application of amendments The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 585. Treatment of victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas (a) Award of Purple Heart required The Secretary of the military department concerned shall award the Purple Heart to the members of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded in the attacks that occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009. (b) Exception This section shall not apply to a member of the Armed Forces whose death or wound in an attack described in subsection (a) was the result of the willful misconduct of the member. 586. Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge (a) Authority To award The Secretary of the Army may award the Army Combat Action Badge (established by order of the Secretary of the Army through Headquarters, Department of the Army Letter 600–05–1, dated June 3, 2005) to a person who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat during which the person personally engaged, or was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 2001 (the date of the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity for the award of such decoration), if the Secretary determines that the person has not been previously recognized in an appropriate manner for such participation. (b) Procurement of badge The Secretary of the Army may make arrangements with suppliers of the Army Combat Action Badge so that eligible recipients of the Army Combat Action Badge pursuant to subsection (a) may procure the badge directly from suppliers, thereby eliminating or at least substantially reducing administrative costs for the Army to carry out this section. 587. Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report describing the Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard to the case. 588. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor during the Korean War (a) Authorization Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3144 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army is authorized and requested to award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor referred to in subsection (b) during the Korean War. (b) Acts of Valor described The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser’s on November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police Company, 2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during the Division’s successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon Pass. 589. Required gold content for Medal of Honor (a) Army (1) Gold content Section 3741 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking The President and inserting (a) Award.—The President; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Gold content The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy. . (2) Exception for duplicate medal Section 3754 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Section 3741(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.. (b) Navy (1) Gold content Section 6241 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking The President and inserting (a) Award.—The President; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Gold content The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy. . (2) Exception for duplicate medal Section 6256 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Section 6241(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.. (c) Air Force (1) Gold content Section 8741 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking The President and inserting (a) Award.—The President; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Gold content The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy. . (2) Exception for duplicate medal Section 8754 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Section 8741(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.. (d) Coast Guard (1) Gold content Section 491 of title 14, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking The President and inserting (a) Award.—The President; and (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Gold content The metal content of the Medal of Honor shall be 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy. . (2) Exception for duplicate medal Section 504 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Section 491(b) of this title shall not apply to the issuance of a duplicate Medal of Honor under this section.. (e) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded after the date of the enactment of this Act. 590. Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations The Secretary of the Army shall consider the nominations for the Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for retired Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, Gilbert Magallanes, and Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr. 590A. Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report describing the Army's review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht. The report shall account for all evidence submitted with regard to the case. 590B. Replacement of military decorations (a) Prompt replacement required; annual report Section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections: (b) Prompt replacement required When a request for the replacement of a military decoration is received under this section or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this title, the Secretary concerned shall ensure that— (1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request, including verification of the service record of the recipient of the military decoration, are completed within one year; and (2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the person requesting the replacement military decoration within 60 days after verification of the service record. (c) Annual report The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report regarding compliance by the military departments with the performance standards imposed by subsection (b). Each report shall include— (1) for the one-year period covered by the report— (A) the average number of days it took to verify the service record and entitlement of members and former members of the armed forces for replacement military decorations; (B) the average number of days between receipt of a request and the date on which the replacement military decoration was mailed; and (C) the average number of days between verification of a service record and the date on which the replacement military decoration was mailed; and (2) an estimate of the funds necessary for the next fiscal year to meet or exceed such performance standards. . (b) Plan required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a plan to implement the amendments made by subsection (a), including an estimate of the funds necessary for fiscal year 2015 to meet or exceed the performance standards imposed by such amendments. 590C. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War (a) Authorization Subject to subsection (c), notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts of gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond the call of duty in the Civil War, as described in subsection (b). (b) Acts of valor described The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on July 3, 1863, during the American Civil War. (c) Report submission Subsection (a) shall take effect upon receipt by the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives of the report, as required in House Report 112–705, providing information on the process and materials used by review boards for the consideration of Medal of Honor recommendations for acts of heroism that occurred during the Civil War. I Other Matters 591. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (6) The University of North Georgia. . 592. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military Cemeteries (a) In general Chapter 446 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts (a) Contracts authorized The Secretary of the Army may enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the provision of transportation, interpretative, or other necessary or appropriate concession services to visitors at the Army National Military Cemeteries. (b) Special requirements (1) The Secretary of the Army shall establish and include in each concession contract such requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at which services are provided under the contract. (2) A concession contract shall not include operation of the gift shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress. (c) Term of contracts (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a concession contract may be awarded for a period of not more than 10 years. (2) (A) If the Secretary of the Army determines that the terms and conditions of a concession contract to be entered into under this section, including any required construction of capital improvements, warrant entering into the contract for a period of greater than 10 years, the Secretary may award the contract for a period of up to 20 years. (B) If a concession contract is intended solely for the provision of transportation services, the Secretary may enter into the contract for a period of not more than five years and may extend the period of the contract for one or more successive five-year periods pursuant to an option included in the contract or a modification of the contract. The aggregate period of any such contract, including extensions, may not exceed 10 years. (d) Franchise fees A concession contract shall provide for payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary of the Army. The Secretary shall ensure that the objective of generating revenue for the United States is subordinate to the objectives of honoring the service and sacrifices of the deceased members of the armed forces and of providing necessary and appropriate services for visitors to the Cemeteries at reasonable rates. (e) Special account All franchise fees (and other monetary consideration) collected by the United States under subsection (d) shall be deposited into a special account established in the Treasury of the United States. The funds deposited in such account shall be available for expenditure by the Secretary of the Army, to the extent authorized and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds deposited into the account shall remain available until expended. (f) Concession contract defined In this section, the term concession contract means a contract authorized and entered into under this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts. . 593. Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues (a) Establishment of Commission There is established the Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues (in this section referred to as the Commission). (b) Membership (1) Composition The Commission shall be composed of 10 members, of whom— (A) two shall be appointed by the President; (B) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (D) two shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and (E) two shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (2) Appointment date The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. If one or more appointments under a subparagraph of paragraph (1) is not made by such appointment date, the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments not made. (3) Expertise In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with expertise in service-connected mental disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), psychiatry, behavioral health, neurology, as well as disciplinary matters and military justice. (4) Period of Appointment; Vacancies Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (5) Initial Meeting Not later than 30 days after the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the Commission shall hold its first meeting. (6) Meetings The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair. A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings. (7) Chair and Vice Chairman The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. (c) Study and report (1) Study required The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of whether— (A) the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action adequately address the impact of service-connected mental disorders and TBI on the basis for the disciplinary action; and (B) whether the disciplinary mechanisms should be revisited in light of new information regarding the connection between service-connected mental disorders and TBI, behavioral problems, and disciplinary action. (2) Considerations In considering the Department of Defense mechanisms for disciplinary action, the Commission shall give particular consideration to evaluating a structure that examines those members diagnosed with or reasonably asserting post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury that have been deployed overseas in support of a contingency operation during the previous 24 months and how that injury or deployment may constitute matters in extenuation that relate to the basis for administrative separation under conditions other than honorable or the overall characterization of service of the member as other than honorable. (3) Report Not later than June 30, 2014, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report containing a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the study required by this subsection, together with its recommendations for such legislation and administrative actions it may consider appropriate in light of the results of the study. (d) Powers of the commission (1) Hearings The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out this section. (2) Information From Federal Agencies The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out this section. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission. (e) Commission personnel matters (1) Compensation of Members All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States. (2) Travel Expenses The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission. (3) Staff The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel from as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission. The staff members should be officers or employees of the United States. (f) Termination date The Commission shall terminate 30 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report. 594. Commission on Service to the Nation (a) Establishment There is established a commission to be known as the Commission on Service to the Nation. (b) Duties (1) Study The Commission shall carry out a study of the following: (A) The effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and conflicts, on members of the Armed Forces, the families of members, and the communities of members. (B) The outgoing experience and transition between military and civilian life. (C) The gaps between the military and those Americans who do not participate directly in the military community. (2) Testimony and research In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Commission shall— (A) hear testimony from all aspects of military and civilian life, including public, private, individual and institutional stakeholders, with personal testimony, expert testimony, academic testimony, as well as testimony from association and community leaders, and other testimony as appropriate; (B) hear and accept testimony in an open and public manner, accepting testimony in a wide variety of ways for each hearing, including submissions made through a public internet website, and testimony heard remotely if appropriate; (C) retain the records of all hearings and artifacts of testimony for the purposes of historical documentation and research; (D) assess the social, mental, and physical effects of war on active members of the Armed Forces, the families of members, and the communities of members and the preparation they receive for transitioning out of the military; and (E) assess the existing academic and social science research and analysis on transition from active military to civilian life. (3) Recommendations The Commission shall make recommendations, based on the analyses in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), on how to better— (A) support the transition to civilian life of a member of the Armed Forces; (B) support the families and communities of the member; and (C) better connect the military community and civilians. (4) Website The Commission shall maintain an Internet website available to the public to— (A) share the schedule of the Commission; (B) notify the public of events; (C) accept feedback; and (D) post records of events and other information to inform the public in a manner consistent with the mission of the Commission. (c) Composition (1) Members The Commission shall be composed of 15 members appointed as follows: (A) Four members appointed by Majority Leader of the Senate, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. (B) Four members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (C) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the Senate, in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. (D) Two members appointed by the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Service of the House of Representatives. (E) Three members appointed by the President. (2) Qualifications The members of the Commission shall be appointed from among persons who have knowledge and expertise in the following areas: (A) The effects of war on members of the Armed Forces, their families, and society. (B) The process of transitioning out of the Armed Forces. (C) The resources available to members and their families as members transition out of the Armed Forces and into society. (D) Personnel benefits, including healthcare and job training, available to members. (E) Policy making and policy analysis. (3) Service requirement Not less than one member of the Commission appointed under each of subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1) shall have served in the Armed Forces. (4) Duration and vacancies Members of the Commission shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. A vacancy in the membership of the Commission shall not affect the powers of the Commission, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. (5) Chairman The President shall designate a member of the Commission to serve as chairman of the Commission. (6) Deadline for appointment The members shall be appointed by not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (d) Procedures (1) Initial meeting The Commission shall hold its initial meeting not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed. (2) Meetings After the initial meeting under paragraph (1), the Commission shall meet at the call of the chairman. (3) Quorum Four members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings. (4) Procedure The Commission shall act by resolution agreed to by a majority of the members of the Commission. (5) Panels The Commission may establish panels composed of less than the full membership of the Commission for the purpose of carrying out the Commission's duties. The actions of each such panel shall be subject to the review and control of the Commission. Any findings and determinations made by such a panel shall not be considered the findings and determinations of the Commission unless approved by the Commission. (e) Compensation and staff (1) Pay Each member of the Commission shall be paid at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which the member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without pay in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States. (2) Travel expenses The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission. (3) Executive director The Commission shall appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for an Executive Director in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code. (4) Staff The Executive Director, with the approval of the Commission, may appoint and fix the rate of basic pay for additional personnel as staff of the Commission in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code. (5) Detail of government employees Upon request of the chairman of the Commission, the head of any Federal department or agency may detail, on a nonreimbursable basis, any personnel of that department or agency to the Commission to assist it in carrying out its duties. (f) Powers (1) Hearings For the purpose of carrying out this Act, the Commission (or on the authority of the Commission, any subcommittee or member) may hold such hearings and forums, and sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, receive such evidence, and administer such oaths as the Commission considers appropriate. The Commission shall hold not less than one hearing in each State, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. (2) Information from Federal agencies The Commission, or designated staff member, may secure directly from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable it to carry out this Act. Upon request of the chairman of the Commission, the chairman of any subcommittee created by a majority of the Commission, or any member designated by a majority of the Commission, the head of that department or agency shall furnish that information to the Commission. (3) Miscellaneous administrative and support services The Secretary of Defense shall furnish the Commission, on a reimbursable basis, any administrative and support services requested by the Commission. (4) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services The chairman of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title. (5) Gifts The Commission may accept, use, and dispose of gifts, bequests, or devises of services or property, both real and personal, for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of the Commission. Gifts, bequests, or devises of money and proceeds from sales of other property received as gifts, bequests, or devises shall be deposited in the Treasury and shall be available for disbursement upon order of the chairman, vice chairman, or designee. (g) Reports (1) Initial report Not later than 90 days after the initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and release to the public, a report setting forth— (A) a strategic plan for the work of the Commission; (B) a discussion of the activities of the Commission; and (C) any initial findings of the Commission. (2) Final report Not later than 18 months after the initial meeting of the Commission, the Commission shall submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and release to the public, a final report. Such report shall include any recommendations developed under subsection (b)(3) that the Commission determines appropriate, including any recommended legislation, policies, regulations, directives, and practices. (h) Termination The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the final report is submitted under subsection (g)(2). 595. Electronic tracking of certain reserve duty The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty service performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such title. 596. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: Members of the Armed Forces not in uniform and veterans may render the military salute in the manner provided for persons in uniform.. 597. Provision of service records (a) In general In accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of each member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format. (b) Timeline The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the covered records of members are made available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as follows: (1) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who was discharged or released from the Armed Forces during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 120 days after the date of such discharge or release. (2) With respect to a member of the Armed Forces who is discharged or released from the Armed Forces on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 90 days after the date of such discharge or release. (c) Certification For each member of the Armed Forces whose covered records are made available under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a letter certifying that— (1) the Secretary of Defense thoroughly reviewed the records of the member; (2) the information provided in the covered records of such member is complete as of the date of the letter; (3) no other information that should be included in such covered records exist as of such date; and (4) if other information is later discovered— (A) such other information will be added to such covered records; and (B) the Secretary of Defense will notify the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of such addition. (d) Sharing of protected health information For purposes of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note), making medical records available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection (a) shall be treated as a permitted disclosure. (e) Currently available records The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall ensure that the covered records of members of the Armed Forces that are available to the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of this Act are made electronically accessible and available in real-time to the Veterans Benefits Administration. (f) Covered records defined In this section, the term covered records means, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces— (1) service treatment records; (2) accompanying personal records; (3) relevant unit records; and (4) medical records created by reason of treatment or services received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code. 598. Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) Commencing August 26, 1946, though late February 1947 the United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program Task Force 68, codenamed Operation Highjump initiated and undertook the largest ever-to-this-date exploration of the Antarctic continent. (2) The primary mission of the Task Force 68 organized by Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd Jr. USN, (Ret) and led by Rear Admiral Richard H. Cruzen, USN, was to do the following: (A) Establish the Antarctic research base Little America IV. (B) In the defense of the United States of America from possible hostile aggression from abroad—to train personnel test equipment, develop techniques for establishing, maintaining and utilizing air bases on ice, with applicability comparable to interior Greenland, where conditions are similar to those of the Antarctic. (C) Map and photograph a full two-thirds of the Antarctic Continent during the classified, hazardous duty/volunteer-only operation involving 4700 sailors, 23 aircraft and 13 ships including the first submarine the U.S.S. Sennet, and the aircraft carrier the U.S.S. Philippine Sea, brought to the edge of the ice pack to launch (6) Navy ski-equipped, rocket-assisted R4Ds. (D) Consolidate and extend United States sovereignty over the largest practicable area of the Antarctic continent. (E) Determine the feasibility of establishing, maintaining and utilizing bases in the Antarctic and investigating possible base sites. (3) While on a hazardous duty/all volunteer mission vital to the interests of National Security and while over the eastern Antarctica coastline known as the Phantom Coast, the PBM–5 Martin Mariner Flying BoatGeorge 1 entered a whiteout over Thurston Island. As the pilot attempted to climb, the aircraft grazed the glacier’s ridgeline and exploded within 5 seconds instantly killing Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Navigator and Wendell Bud Hendersin, Aviation Machinists Mate 1st Class while Frederick Williams, Aviation Radioman 1st Class died several hours later. Six other crewmen survived including the Captain of the George 1’s seaplane tender U.S.S. Pine Island. (4) The bodies of the dead were protected from the desecration of Antarctic scavenging birds (Skuas) by the surviving crew wrapping the bodies and temporarily burying the men under the starboard wing engine nacelle. (5) Rescue requirements of the George–1 survivors forced the abandonment of their crewmates’ bodies. (6) Conditions prior to the departure of Task Force 68 precluded a return to the area to the recover the bodies. (7) For nearly 60 years Navy promised the families that they would recover the men: If the safety, logistical, and operational prerequisites allow a mission in the future, every effort will be made to bring our sailors home.. (8) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command twice offered to recover the bodies of this crew for Navy. (9) A 2004 NASA ground penetrating radar overflight commissioned by Navy relocated the crash site three miles from its crash position. (10) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command offered to underwrite the cost of an aerial ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey of the crash site area by NASA. (11) The Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command studied the recovery with the recognized recovery authorities and national scientists and determined that the recovery is only medium risk. (12) National Science Foundation and scientists from the University of Texas, Austin, regularly visit the island. (13) The crash site is classified as a perishable site, meaning a glacier that will calve into the Bellingshausen Sea. (14) The National Science Foundation maintains a presence in area—of the Pine Island Glacier. (15) The National Science Foundation Director of Polar Operations will assist and provide assets for the recovery upon the request of Congress. (16) The United States Coast Guard is presently pursuing the recovery of 3 WWII air crewmen from similar circumstances in Greenland. (17) On Memorial Day, May 25, 2009, President Barack Obama declared: * * * the support of our veterans is a sacred trust * * * we need to serve them as they have served us * * * that means bringing home all our POWs and MIAs * * *. (18) The policies and laws of the United States of America require that our armed service personnel be repatriated. (19) The fullest possible accounting of United States fallen military personnel means repatriating living American POWs and MIAs, accounting for, identifying, and recovering the remains of military personnel who were killed in the line of duty, or providing convincing evidence as to why such a repatriation, accounting, identification, or recovery is not possible. (20) It is the responsibility of the Federal Government to return to the United States for proper burial and respect all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty who lie in lost graves. (b) Sense of congress In light of the findings under subsection (a), Congress— (1) reaffirms its support for the recovery and return to the United States, the remains and bodies of all members of the Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, and for the efforts by the Joint POW-MIA Accounting Command to recover the remains of members of the Armed Forces from all wars, conflicts and missions; (2) recognizes the courage and sacrifice of all members of the Armed Forces who participated in Operation Highjump and all missions vital to the national security of the United States of America; (3) acknowledges the dedicated research and efforts by the US Geological Survey, the National Science Foundation, the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, the Fallen American Veterans Foundation and all persons and organizations to identify, locate, and advocate for, from their temporary Antarctic grave, the recovery of the well-preserved frozen bodies of Ensign Maxwell Lopez, Naval Aviator, Frederick Williams, Aviation Machinist’s Mate 1ST Class, Wendell Hendersin, Aviation Radioman 1ST Class of the George 1 explosion and crash; and (4) encourages the Department of Defense to review the facts, research and to pursue new efforts to undertake all feasible efforts to recover, identify, and return the well-preserved frozen bodies of the George 1 crew from Antarctica’s Thurston Island. 599. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units Section 974 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: (d) Performances funded by private donation Notwithstanding section 2601(c) of this title, any gift made to the Secretary of Defense under section 2601 on the condition that such gift be used for the benefit of a military musical unit shall be credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds for such military musical unit. Any amount so credited shall be merged with amounts in the appropriation or account to which credited, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation or account. . VI Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits A Pay and Allowances 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay Section 204(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking date when he appears at the place of company rendezvous and inserting date on which the member, in person or by authorized telephonic or electronic means, contacts the member’s unit; and (2) by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: However, this subsection does not authorize any expenditure before the member makes authorized contact that is not authorized by law to be paid after such authorized contact.. B Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus. (2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus. (3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units. (4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service. (5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. (7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance. (8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals (a) Title 10 authorities The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. (2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. (b) Title 37 authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists. (2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. (3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists. (4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. (5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers. (6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers. (7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties. (8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service. (2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus. (3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. (2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. (3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers. (4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers. (5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions. (6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. (7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty pay. (8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus. (9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014: (1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention bonus. (2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. (3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active members. (4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. (5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills. (6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. (7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between armed forces. (8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (a) Bonus authorized Chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following new section: 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (a) Contracting bonus authorized The Secretary concerned may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or midshipman enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps who executes a written agreement described in subsection (c). (b) Amount of bonus The amount of a bonus under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000. (c) Agreement A written agreement referred to in subsection (a) is a written agreement by the cadet or midshipman— (1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10; (2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of title 10; (3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer of the armed forces; and (4) to serve on active duty. (d) Payment method Upon acceptance of a written agreement under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, the total amount of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed. The agreement shall specify when the bonus will be paid and whether the bonus will be paid in a lump sum or in installments. (e) Repayment A person who, having received all or part of a bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms of the written agreement required by such subsection for receipt of the bonus shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 of this title. (f) Regulations The Secretary concerned shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. (g) Termination of authority No agreement under this section may be entered into after December 31, 2015. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 335 the following new item: 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. . C Disability, Retired Pay, Survivor, and Transitional Benefits 621. Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents of certain members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (a) In general Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1059 the following new section: 1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses: transitional compensation; commissary and exchange benefits (a) Authority To pay compensation The Secretary of Defense, with respect to the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy), and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, may each establish a program under which the Secretary may pay monthly transitional compensation in accordance with this section to dependents or former dependents of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) who is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. (b) Members and punitive actions covered This section applies in the case of a member of the armed forces who, after completing more than 20 years of active service or more than 20 years of service computed under section 12732 of this title— (1) is convicted by court-martial of an offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice); (2) is separated from active duty pursuant to the sentence of the court-martial; and (3) forfeits all pay and allowances pursuant to the sentence of the court-martial. (c) Recipient of payments (1) In the case of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b), the Secretary may pay compensation under this section to dependents or former dependents of the member as follows: (A) If the member was married at the time of the commission of the offense resulting in separation from the armed forces, such compensation may be paid to the spouse or former spouse to whom the member was married at that time, including an amount for each, if any, dependent child of the member who resides in the same household as that spouse or former spouse. (B) If there is a spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible for compensation under this section and if there is a dependent child of the member who does not reside in the same household as that spouse or former spouse, compensation under this section may be paid to each such dependent child of the member who does not reside in that household. (C) If there is no spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible under this section, compensation under this section may be paid to the dependent children of the member. (2) A dependent or former dependent of a member described in subsection (b) is not eligible for transitional compensation under this section if the Secretary concerned determines (under regulations prescribed under subsection (g)) that the dependent or former dependent was an active participant in the conduct constituting the offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) for which the member was convicted and separated from the armed forces. (d) Commencement and duration of payment (1) If provided under this section, the payment of transitional compensation under this section shall commence— (A) as of the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged if the sentence, as adjudged, includes— (i) a dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge; and (ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances; or (B) if there is a pretrial agreement that provides for disapproval or suspension of the dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay and allowances, as of the date of the approval of the court-martial sentence by the person acting under section 860(c) of this title (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) if the sentence, as approved, includes— (i) an unsuspended dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge; and (ii) forfeiture of all pay and allowances. (2) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e), paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (g), and subsections (f) and (h) of section 1059 of this title shall apply in determining— (A) the amount of transitional compensation to be paid under this section; (B) the period for which such compensation may be paid; and (C) the circumstances under which the payment of such compensation may or will cease. (e) Commissary and exchange benefits A dependent or former dependent who receives transitional compensation under this section shall, while receiving such payments, be entitled to use commissary and exchange stores in the same manner as provided in subsection (j) of section 1059 of this title. (f) Coordination of benefits The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section and section 1059 or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive. (g) Regulations If the Secretary of Defense (or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) establishes a program to provide transitional compensation under this section, that Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out the program. (h) Dependent child defined In this section, the term dependent child, with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces referred to in subsection (b), has the meaning given such term in subsection (l) of section 1059 of this title, except that status as a dependent child shall be determined as of the date on which the member described in subsection (b) is convicted of the offense concerned. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1059 the following new item: 1059a. Dependents of certain members separated for Uniform Code of Military Justice offenses: transitional compensation; commissary and exchange benefits. . (c) Conforming amendment Subsection (i) of section 1059 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (i) Coordination of benefits The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section and section 1059a or 1408(h)(1) of this title. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments by the Secretary pursuant to section 1408(h)(1) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059a, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive. . 622. Prevention of retired pay inversion for members whose retired pay is computed using high-three average (a) Clarification of rule for members who became members on or after September 8, 1980 Section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the monthly retired pay of a member or a former member of an armed force and inserting the following: (A) Members with retired pay computed using final basic pay The monthly retired pay of a member or former member of an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Members with retired pay computed using high-three Subject to subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay of a member or former member of an armed force who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, may not be less, on the date on which the member or former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired pay to which the member or former member would be entitled on that date if the member or former member had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay under this section. However, in the case of a member or former member whose retired pay is computed subject to section 1407(f) of this title, subparagraph (A) (rather than the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same manner as if the member or former member first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but only with respect to a calculation as of the date on which the member or former member first became entitled to retired pay. . (b) Applicability Subparagraph (B) of section 1401a(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer pay of any member or former member of an Armed Force who first became a member of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of the date on which the member first becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay. D Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 631. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking take or fail to take and inserting take, threaten to take, or fail to take. 632. Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems (a) Improved purchasing efforts Section 2481(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) (A) The governing body established pursuant to paragraph (2) shall endeavor to increase the purchase for resale at commissary stores and exchange stores of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials. (B) As part of its efforts under subparagraph (A), the governing body shall develop— (i) guidelines for the identification of fresh meat, poultry, seafood, and fish, fresh produce, and other products raised or produced through sustainable methods; and (ii) goals, applicable to all commissary stores and exchange stores world-wide, to maximize, to the maximum extent practical, the purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials by September 30, 2018. . (b) Deadline for establishment and guidelines The initial guidelines required by paragraph (3)(B)(i) of section 2481(c) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall be issued not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 633. Correction of obsolete references to certain nonappropriated fund instrumentalities Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service, Navy Ship’s Stores Ashore and inserting Navy Ships Stores Program. 634. Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh (a) Special procurement guidance for garments manufactured in Bangladesh The senior official of the Department of Defense designated pursuant to section 2481(c) to oversee the defense commissary system and the exchange store system shall require, consistent with applicable international agreements, that the exchange store system— (1) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh for the private label brands of the exchange store system, becomes a signatory of or otherwise complies with applicable requirements set forth in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh; (2) for the purchase of licensed apparel manufactured in Bangladesh, gives a preference to licensees that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh; and (3) for the purchase of garments manufactured in Bangladesh from retail suppliers, gives a preference to retail suppliers that are signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh. (b) Notice of exceptions If any garments manufactured in Bangladesh are purchased from suppliers that are not signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, the Department of Defense official referred to in subsection (a) shall notify Congress of the purchase and the reasons therefor. (c) Effective date The requirements imposed by this section shall take effect 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act or as soon after that date as the Secretary of Defense determines to be practicable so as to avoid disruption in garment supplies for the exchange store system. E Other Matters 641. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human remains retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation (a) Disposition of remains of persons whose death is investigated by the armed forces medical examiner (1) Covered decedents Section 1481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of this title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been retained by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title. . (2) Authorized expenses relating to care and disposition of remains Section 1482 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, care, and disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by section 1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, would not have been incurred but for the retention of those remains for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title. The Secretary concerned shall pay all other expenses authorized to be paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be credited to appropriations available at the time of reimbursement for the payment of such expenses. (2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person designated under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the remains that were retained for the forensic pathology investigation, the Secretary may pay for the transportation of those remains to, and interment or inurnment of those remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under subsection (a)(8). (3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may be paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under subsection (a)(8), whether or not on a reimbursable basis. . (b) Clarification of coverage of inurnment Section 1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting or inurnment after Interment. (c) Technical amendment Section 1482(f) of such title is amended in the third sentence by striking this subsection and inserting this section. 642. Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the reserve components as veterans (a) Veteran status (1) In general Chapter 1 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 107 the following new section: 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components Any person who is entitled under chapter 1223 of title 10 to retired pay for nonregular service or, but for age, would be entitled under such chapter to retired pay for nonregular service shall be honored as a veteran but shall not be entitled to any benefit by reason of this section. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 107 the following new item: 107A. Honoring as veterans certain persons who performed service in the reserve components. . (b) Clarification regarding benefits No person may receive any benefit under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs solely by reason of section 107A of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). 643. Survey of military pay and benefits preferences (a) Survey required The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a anonymous survey of random members of the Armed Forces regarding military pay and benefits. (b) Content of survey A survey under this section shall be conducted for the purpose of soliciting information on the following: (1) The value that members of the Armed Forces place on the following forms of compensation relative to one another: (A) Basic pay. (B) Allowances for housing and subsistence. (C) Bonuses and special pays. (D) Dependent healthcare benefits. (E) Healthcare benefits for retirees under 65 years old. (F) Healthcare benefits for Medicare-eligible retirees. (G) Retirement pay. (2) How the members value different levels of pay or benefits, including the impact of co-payments or deductibles on the value of benefits. (3) Any other issues related to military pay and benefits as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (4) How information collected pursuant to a previous paragraph varies by age, rank, dependent status, and other factors the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. (c) Submission of results Upon the completion of a survey conducted under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress and make publicly available a report containing the results of the survey, including both the analyses and the raw data collected. 644. Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total (a) Availability of transportation Section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 622 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): (f) Special priority for certain disabled veterans (1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide, at no additional cost to the Department of Defense and with no aircraft modification, transportation on scheduled and unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing space-available transportation priorities under the travel program, the Secretary shall provide transportation under paragraph (1) on the same basis as such transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay. (3) The requirement to provide transportation on Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on the priority basis described in paragraph (2) to veterans covered by this subsection applies whether or not the travel program is established under this section. (4) In this subsection, the terms veteran and service-connected have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 38. . (b) Effective date Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. VII Health Care Provisions A Improvements to Health Benefits 701. Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces (a) In general Section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) and (C) as subparagraph (C) and (D), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following: (B) Once during each 180-day period during which a member is deployed. ; and (2) in subsection (c)(1)(A)— (A) in clause (i), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and (C) by inserting after clause (i) the following: (ii) by personnel in deployed units whose responsibilities include providing unit health care services if such personnel are available and the use of such personnel for the assessments would not impair the capacity of such personnel to perform higher priority tasks; and . (b) Conforming amendment Section 1074m(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and (C) and inserting subparagraph (C) and (D). 702. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces (a) In general Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the following new section: 1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the armed forces (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall provide periodic, person-to-person mental health assessments to each member of the armed forces serving on active duty. (b) Frequency The Secretary shall determine the frequency of the mental health assessments provided under subsection (a). (c) Elements (1) The mental health assessments provided under subsection (a) shall meet the requirements for mental health assessments as described in section 1074m(c)(1) of this title. (2) The Secretary may treat health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under sections 1074f and 1074m of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section. (d) Sharing of information Section 1074m(e) of this title, regarding the sharing of information with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall apply to mental health assessments provided under subsection (a). (e) Regulations The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074m the following new item: 1074n. Periodic mental health assessments for members of the armed forces. . 703. Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under TRICARE (a) In general Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) (1) Subject to paragraph (3)(A), in providing health care under subsection (a), the treatment of developmental disabilities (as defined by section 102(8) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))), including autism spectrum disorder, shall include behavioral health treatment, including applied behavior analysis, when prescribed by a physician. (2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall ensure that— (A) except as provided by subparagraph (B), a person who is authorized to provide behavioral health treatment is licensed or certified by a State or accredited national certification board; and (B) applied behavior analysis or other behavioral health treatment may be provided by an employee, contractor, or trainee of a person described in subparagraph (A) if the employee, contractor, or trainee meets minimum qualifications, training, and supervision requirements as set forth by the Secretary. (3) (A) This subsection shall not apply to— (i) a medicare eligible beneficiary (as defined in section 1111(b) of this title); or (ii) a covered beneficiary who is a beneficiary by reason of being a retired member of the Coast Guard, the Commissioned Corp of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or the Commissioned Corp of the Public Health Service, or by being a dependent of such a retired member. (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (A), nothing in this subsection shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting the benefits otherwise provided to a covered beneficiary under— (i) this chapter; (ii) title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.); or (iii) any other law. . (b) Funding (1) Increase Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by $60,000,000. (2) Offset Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 280) is hereby reduced by $60,000,000. 704. Extension of Transitional Assistance Management Program (a) Telemedicine In carrying out the Transitional Assistance Management Program, the Secretary of Defense shall extend the coverage of such program to individuals by an additional 180 days for treatment provided through telemedicine. (b) Mental health care and behavioral services (1) In general The Secretary shall extend the coverage of the Transitional Assistance Management Program for covered treatment to covered individuals for a period determined necessary by a health care professional treating the covered individual. (2) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term covered individual means an individual who— (i) during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled in the Transitional Assistance Management Program, received any mental health care treatment or covered treatment; or (ii) during the one-year period preceding separation or discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental health care treatment. (B) The term covered treatment means behavioral services provided through telemedicine. (3) Sunset The authority of the Secretary to carry out paragraph (1) shall terminate on December 31, 2018, if the Secretary determines that by that date the suicide rates for both members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and for members of a reserve component are 50 percent less than such rates as of December 31, 2012. (c) Telemedicine defined In this section, the term telemedicine means the use by a health care provider of telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis or treatment of a patient's medical condition, including for behavioral services. 705. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of service members with urotrauma (a) Comprehensive policy required (1) In general Not later than January 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management, and transition of recovering service members with urotrauma. (2) Scope of policy The policy shall cover each of the following: (A) The care and management of the specific needs of service members who are urotrauma patients, including eligibility for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program pursuant to the Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note). (B) The return of service members who have recovered to active duty when appropriate. (C) The transition of recovering service members from receipt of care and services through the Department of Defense to receipt of care and services through the Department of Veterans Affairs. (3) Consultation The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall develop the policy in consultation with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government, with representatives of military service organizations representing the interests of service members who are urotrauma patients and with appropriate nongovernmental organizations having an expertise in matters relating to the policy. (b) Report The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to Congress a report that includes a review identifying and options for responding to gaps in the care of service members who are urotrauma patients. B Health Care Administration 711. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1816) is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and (2) by inserting the following new subsection: (b) Access to TRICARE Prime (1) One-time election Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible beneficiary who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, may make a one-time election to continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based on the location in which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary may continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so long as the beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code as the ZIP Code in which the beneficiary resided at the time of such election. (2) Enrollment in TRICARE Standard If an affected eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A). (3) Residence at time of election An affected eligible beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does not reside in a ZIP code that is in a region described in subsection (c)(1)(B). . 712. Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities Section 713 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking Secretary of Defense and inserting Secretary concerned; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking Secretary shall and inserting Secretary concerned shall; (B) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting if the Secretary establishing such agreement is the Secretary of Defense before the semicolon; and (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting or the military department concerned after the Department of Defense; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Secretary concerned defined In this section, the term Secretary concerned means— (1) the Secretary of a military department; or (2) the Secretary of Defense. . 713. Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health record program (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement or research, development, test, and evaluation for the Department of Defense for the integrated electronic health record program, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report detailing an analysis of alternatives for the plan of the Secretary to proceed with such program. (b) Matters included The report under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A description of the key performance requirements for the integrated electronic health record program capability. (2) An analysis of alternatives for how to acquire and implement an integrated electronic health record capability that meets such requirements. (3) An assessment of the budgetary resources and timeline required for each of the evaluated alternatives. (4) A recommendation by the Secretary with respect to the alternative preferred by the Secretary. 714. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities (a) Pilot program (1) In general The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry out a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to increase the amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10, United States Code, from a third-party payer for charges for health care services incurred by the United States at a military medical treatment facility. (2) Processes described The processes described in this paragraph are revenue-cycle management processes, including cash-flow management and accounts-receivable processes. (b) Requirements In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall— (1) identify and analyze the best practice option, including commercial best practices, with respect to the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in nonmilitary health care facilities; and (2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable results of the pilot program, including an analysis of— (A) the different processes used in the pilot program; (B) the amount of third-party collections that resulted from such processes; (C) the cost to implement and sustain such processes; and (D) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate to assess the pilot program. (c) Locations The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1)— (1) at military installations that have a military medical treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient capabilities; (2) at a number of such installations at different military departments that the Secretary determines sufficient to fully assess the results of the pilot program. (d) Duration The Secretary shall commence the pilot program under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall carry out such program for three years. (e) Report Not later than 180 days after completing the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the program, including— (1) a comparison of— (A) the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that were used in the military medical treatment facilities participating in the program; and (B) the third-party collection processes used by military medical treatment facilities not included in the program; (2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes described in subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military medical treatment facilities; and (3) an assessment of the program, including any recommendations to improve third-party collections. (f) Additional report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the methods, as of the date of the report, employed by the military departments to collect charges from third-party payers incurred at military medical treatment facilities, including specific data with respect to the dollar amount of third-party collections that resulted from each method currently being used throughout the military departments. The Secretary shall take into account the results of such report in evaluating the results of the pilot program under subsection (a)(1). C Other Matters 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the reserve components (a) In general Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget information The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the documentation that supports the President’s annual budget for the Department of Defense, a budget justification display with respect to embedded mental health providers within each reserve component, including the amount requested for each such component. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 236. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget information. . 722. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (B)— (A) by inserting , or any other nonprofit entity after Military Medicine; and (B) by inserting , or nonprofit entity, after such Foundation; and (2) in subparagraph (C)— (A) by inserting , or any other nonprofit entity, after Military Medicine; and (B) by inserting , or nonprofit entity, after such foundation. 723. Mental health support for military personnel and families The Secretary of Defense may carry out collaborative programs to— (1) respond to the escalating suicide rates and combat stress related arrest rates of members of the Armed Forces; (2) train active duty members to recognize and respond to combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction, risk-taking behaviors, and family violence; and (3) determine the effectiveness of the efforts of the Department of Defense in reducing suicide rates of members of the Armed Forces. 724. Research regarding hydrocephalus In conducting the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program, the Secretary of Defense may consider selecting medical research projects relating to hydrocephalus. 725. Traumatic brain injury research The Secretary of Defense shall carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including activities regarding drug development to halt neurodegeneration following traumatic brain injury. 726. Data sharing with State adjutant generals to facilitate suicide prevention efforts Upon the request of any adjutant general of a State, the Secretary of Defense shall share the contact information of members of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees who reside in the State of such adjutant general for the purpose of conducting suicide prevention outreach efforts. 727. Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast cancer The Office of Health of the Department of Defense shall work in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health to— (1) identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer; and (2) provide information useful in biomarker selection, drug discovery, and clinical trials design that will enable both— (A) triple negative breast cancer patients to be identified earlier in the progression of their disease; and (B) the development of multiple targeted therapies for the disease. 728. Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the Armed Forces and their families It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Secretary of Defense should develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow of qualified counselors to meet the long-term needs of members of the Armed Forces and their families for counselors; and (2) the plan should include the participation of accredited schools and universities, health care providers, professional counselors, family service or support centers, chaplains, and other appropriate resources of the Department of Defense. 729. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in Department of Defense centers of excellence Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate a report on the centers of excellence established under sections 1621, 1622, and 1623 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). Such report shall include each of the following: (1) The amount of resources that have been obligated by Department of Veterans Affairs in support of each of the centers since the dates on which they were established, including the amount of personnel, time, money, and function provided in support of the centers. (2) An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary expects the Department to dedicate to each of the centers during each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018. (3) A description of the role of the Department within each of the centers. 730. Preliminary mental health assessments Before any individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is commissioned as an officer in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the individual with a mental health assessment. The Secretary shall use such results as a baseline for any subsequent mental health examinations, including such examinations provided under sections 1074f and 1074m of title 10, United States Code, and section 1074n of such title, as added by section 702. 731. Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan It is the sense of Congress that— (1) section 739(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1822) requires the Secretary of Defense to submit a plan to Congress to improve the coordination and integration of the programs of the Department of Defense that address traumatic brain injury and the psychological health of members of the Armed Forces not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of such Act; (2) the requirement to submit the plan is still in effect and the contents of the plan are still important; and (3) the Secretary of Defense should deliver the report within the required time frame. 732. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify, refer, and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to members of the Armed Forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the date in June 2010 on which the memorandum regarding using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury took effect. 733. Pilot program for investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder (a) Process The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a five-year pilot program under which the Secretary shall establish a process through which the Secretary shall provide payment for investigational treatments (including diagnostic testing) of traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder received by members of the Armed Forces in health care facilities other than military treatment facilities. Such process shall provide that payment be made directly to the health care facility furnishing the treatment. (b) Conditions for approval The approval by the Secretary for payment for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions: (1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be approved or cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for any purpose and its use must comply with rules of the Food and Drug Administration applicable to investigational new drugs or investigational devices. (2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary following approval by an institutional review board operating in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. (3) The patient receiving the treatment must demonstrate an improvement under criteria approved by the Secretary, as a result of the treatment on one or more of the following: (A) Standardized independent pre-treatment and post-treatment neuropsychological testing. (B) Accepted survey instruments including, such instruments that look at quality of life. (C) Neurological imaging. (D) Clinical examination. (4) The patient receiving the treatment must be receiving the treatment voluntarily and based on informed consent. (5) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a retired member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to benefits under part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of title XVIII of the Social Security Act. (c) Additional restrictions authorized The Secretary may establish additional restrictions or conditions for reimbursement as the Secretary determines appropriate to ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate fiscal management, and the validity of the research results. (d) Authority The Secretary shall make payments under this section for treatments received by members of the Armed Forces using the authority in subsection (c)(1) of section 1074 of title 10, United States Code. (e) Amount A payment under this section shall be made at the equivalent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement rate in effect for appropriate treatment codes for the State or territory in which the treatment is received. If no such rate is in effect, payment shall be made on a cost-reimbursement basis, as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services. (f) Data collection and availability (1) In general The Secretary shall develop and maintain a database containing data from each patient case involving the use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and that any use of the database or disclosures of such data are limited to such use and disclosures permitted by law and applicable regulations. (2) Publication of qualified institutional review board studies The Secretary shall ensure that an Internet website of the Department of Defense includes a list of all civilian institutional review board studies that have received a payment under this section. (g) Assistance for members to obtain treatment (1) Assignment to temporary duty The Secretary of a military department may assign a member of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to temporary duty or allow the member a permissive temporary duty in order to permit the member to receive treatment for traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder, for which payments shall be made under subsection (a), at a location beyond reasonable commuting distance of the permanent duty station of the member. (2) Per diem A member who is away from the permanent station of the member may be paid a per diem in lieu of subsistence in an amount not more than the amount to which the member would be entitled if the member were performing travel in connection with a temporary duty assignment. (3) Gift rule waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive any rule of the Department of Defense regarding ethics or the receipt of gifts with respect to any assistance provided to a member of the Armed Forces for travel or per diem expenses incidental to receiving treatment under this section. (h) Memoranda of understanding The Secretary shall enter into memoranda of understandings with civilian institutions for the purpose of providing members of the Armed Forces with treatment carried out by civilian health care practitioners under treatment— (1) approved by and under the oversight of civilian institutional review boards; and (2) that would qualify for payment under this section. (i) Outreach The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to notify members of the Armed Forces of the opportunity to receive treatment pursuant to this section. (j) Report to congress Not later than 30 days after the last day of each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to make payments under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress an annual report on the implementation of this section and any available results on investigational treatment studies authorized under this section. (k) Termination The authority to make a payment under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. (l) Authorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for each fiscal year during which the Secretary is authorized to make payments under this section. (m) Funding increase and offsetting reduction (1) In general Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, to carry out this section during fiscal year 2014— (A) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1406 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby increased by $10,000,000, with the amount of the increase allocated to the Defense Health Program, as set forth in the table under section 4501, to carry out this section; and (B) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 301 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in division D, is hereby reduced by $10,000,000, with the amount of the reduction to be derived from Line 280, Office of the Secretary of Defense as set forth in the table under section 4301. (2) Merit-based or competitive decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds referred to in paragraph (1)(A) with or to a specific entity shall— (A) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k), 2361, and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (B) comply with other applicable provisions of law. 734. Integrated Electronic Health Record of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) despite repeated attempts at cooperation over the past 20 years, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution that allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical health care data; (2) the recent decision by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to abandon their earlier agreement and pursue separate paths to integration jeopardizes the stated goal of providing a patient-centered health care system that delivers excellent quality, access, satisfaction, and value, consistently across the Departments; (3) despite the repeated concerns and objections of the congressional committees of jurisdiction, the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs seem to be on a continued path to fail in achieving the goal of creating a seamless health record that integrates data across the Departments; and (4) the President should make the necessary leadership changes to assure timely completion of this requirement. (b) Implementation The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— (1) implement an integrated electronic health record to be used by each of the Secretaries; and (2) deploy such record by not later than October 1, 2016. (c) Design principles The integrated electronic health record established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the following principles: (1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such record shall be based on objectives, activities, and milestones established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2013–2015, including any requirements, definition, documents, or analyses previously developed to satisfy said Joint Strategic Plan. (2) Principles with respect to open architecture standards, including— (A) modular designs based on standards with loose coupling and high cohesion that allow for independent acquisition of system components; (B) if existing national standards do not exist as of the date on which the record is being established, the Secretaries shall agree upon and adopt a standard for purposes of the record until such time as national standards are established; (C) enterprise investment strategies that maximize reuse of proven system designs; (D) implementation of aggressive life-cycle sustainment planning that uses proven technology insertion strategies and product upgrade techniques; (E) enforcement of system design transparency, continuous design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews that include government, academia, and industry; and (F) strategies for data-use rights to ensure a level competitive playing field and access to alternative solutions and sources across the life-cycle of the program. (3) By the point of full deployment decision, such record must be at a generation 3 level or better for a health information technology system. (d) Program plan Not later than January 31, 2014, the Secretaries shall jointly develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a program plan for the oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health record program established under this section. This plan shall include— (1) program objectives; (2) organization; (3) responsibilities of the Departments; (4) technical system requirements; (5) milestones, including a schedule for industry competitions for capabilities needed to satisfy the technical system requirements; (6) technical system standards being adopted by the program; (7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the performance and effectiveness of the program; and (8) level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017. (e) Assessment (1) In general The Secretaries shall jointly commission an independent assessment of the program plan under subsection (d). (2) Submission Not later than 60 days after the date on which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees, the Secretaries shall jointly submit to such committees the independent assessment conducted under paragraph (1). (f) Limitation of funds Not more than 25 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for development , modernization, or enhancement of the integrated electronic health record within the Department of Veterans Affairs or for operation and maintenance for the Defense Health Agency of the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended until the date on which the program plan under subsection (d) is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees. (g) Monthly reporting On a monthly basis, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans affairs shall each submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the expenditures incurred by the Secretary in the development of an integrated electronic health record under this section. Such reports shall include obligations by major categories of spending and by support of milestones identified in the program plan required under subsection (d). (h) Requirements (1) In general Not later than October 1, 2014, all health care information contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA and the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall be available and actionable in real-time to health care providers in each Department through shared technology. (2) Certification At such time as the operational capability described in paragraph (1) is achieved, the Secretaries shall jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretaries have implemented such operational capability. (3) Limitation of funds Neither the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may obligate or expend more than 10 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the research, development, test, and evaluation, or procurement for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record until the date on which the certification is made under paragraph (2). (4) Responsible official The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall each identify a senior official to be responsible for the electronic health record established under this section, including the operational capability described in paragraph (1). Such official shall have included within their performance evaluation performance metrics related to the execution of the responsibilities under this paragraph. Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the name of the senior official selected under this paragraph. (5) Accountability review If the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs fail to meet the requirements under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall jointly conduct an accountability review to identify the following: (A) The root cause of the failure and if the failure is a result of technology or human performance. (B) The work sections responsible for the failure. (C) The milestones and resource investment required to achieve such requirements. (D) The recommendations for corrective actions, to include personnel actions, to achieve such requirements. (6) Submission of accountability review If the Secretaries conduct a review under paragraph (5), the Secretaries shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report of the results of the review by not later than November 30, 2014. (i) Advisory panel (1) Establishment Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly establish an advisory panel to support the development and validation of requirements, programmatic assessment, and other actions, as needed by the Secretaries, with respect to the integrated electronic health record established under subsection (b). The panel shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that such record meets the definition of integrated as specified in subsection (j)(4). (2) Membership The panel established under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than 14 members, appointed by the Secretaries as follows: (A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the Secretaries. (B) The chief information officer of the Department of Defense and the chief information officer of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (C) One member from the acquisition community of the Department of Defense and one member from such community of the Department of Veterans Affairs. (D) Two members from the academic community appointed by the Secretary of Defense. (E) Two members from the academic community appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. (F) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of Defense. (G) Two members from industry appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. (3) Reporting The Advisory panel established under paragraph (1) shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a quarterly report on the activities of the panel. The panel shall submit the first report by not later than December 31, 2013. (j) Definitions In this section: (1) The term actionable means information that is directly useful to customers for immediate use in clinical decision making. (2) The term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the congressional defense committees; and (B) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (3) The term generation 3 means, with respect to an electronic health systems, a system that has the technical capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the point of care and provide functionality for multiple care venues. (4) The term integrated means one single core technology or an inherent cross-platform capability without the need for additional patch development to accomplish this capability. 735. Comptroller General report on recovery audit program for TRICARE Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that evaluates the similarities and differences in the approaches to identifying and recovering improper payments across Medicare and TRICARE. The report shall contain an evaluation of the following: (1) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to prevent improper payments by denying claims prior to payment. (2) Medicare and TRICARE claims processing efforts to correct improper payments post-payment. (3) The effectiveness of Medicare and TRICARE post-payment audit programs in place to identify and correct improper payments that are returned to the government plans. VIII Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related Matters A Acquisition Policy and Management 801. Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense business system acquisition programs when initial operating capability is not achieved within five years of Milestone A approval (a) Submission to pre-certification authority Subsection (b) of section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2316; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking the system shall be deemed to have undergone and all that follows through the period and inserting the appropriate official shall report such failure, along with the facts and circumstances surrounding the failure, to the appropriate pre-certification authority for that system under section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, and the information so reported shall be considered by the pre-certification authority in the decision whether to recommend certification of obligations under that section.. (b) Covered systems Subsection (c) of such section is amended— (1) by striking 3542(b)(2) of title 44 and inserting section 2222(j)(2) of title 10; and (2) by inserting , and that is not designated in section 2445a of title 10, United States Code, as a major automated information system program or an other major information technology investment program before the period at the end. (c) Updated references to DOD issuances Subsection (d) of such section is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2 and inserting Department of Defense Directive 5000.01; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2, dated May 12, 2003 and inserting Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02, dated December 3, 2008. 802. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories (a) Definitions As used in this section: (1) The term military department has the meaning provided in section 101 of title 10, United States Code. (2) The term DOD laboratory or laboratory means any facility or group of facilities that— (A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by the Department of Defense; and (B) meets the definition of laboratory as provided in subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a). (b) Authority (1) In general The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each may authorize the heads of DOD laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for rights to other intellectual property, for computer software and its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory, but only if— (A) the computer software and related documentation would be a trade secret under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, if the information had been obtained from a non-Federal party; (B) the public is notified of the availability of the software and related documentation for licensing and interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit applications for licensing; (C) such licensing activities and licenses comply with the requirements under section 209 of title 35, United States Code; and (D) the software originally was developed to meet the military needs of the Department of Defense. (2) Protections against unauthorized disclosure The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department each shall provide appropriate precautions against the unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or documentation covered by paragraph (1)(A), including exemption from section 552 of title 5, United States Code, for a period of up to 5 years after the development of the computer software by the DOD laboratory. (c) Royalties (1) Use of royalties Except as provided in paragraph (2), any royalties or other payments received by the Department of Defense or a military department from licensing computer software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be retained by the Department of Defense or the military department and shall be disposed of as follows: (A) (i) The Department of Defense or the military department shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at least 15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, to be divided among the employees who developed the computer software. (ii) The Department of Defense or the military department may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the royalties or other payments, to laboratory employees who are not developers of such computer software but who substantially increased the technical value of the software. (iii) The Department of Defense or the military department shall retain the royalties and other payments received until it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory under clause (i) or (ii). (iv) The Department of Defense or the military department may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay expenses incidental to the administration and distribution of royalties or other payments under this section by an organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military department other than its laboratories. (B) The balance of the royalties or other payments shall be transferred by the Department of Defense or the military department to its laboratories, with the majority share of the royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where the development occurred. The royalties or other payments so transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by that laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are received or during the 2 succeeding fiscal years— (i) to reward scientific, engineering, and technical employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether the technology has commercial applications; (ii) to further scientific exchange among the laboratories of the agency; (iii) for education and training of employees consistent with the research and development missions and objectives of the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory, and for other activities that increase the potential for transfer of the technology of the laboratories; (iv) for payment of expenses incidental to the administration and licensing of computer software or other intellectual property made at that DOD laboratory, including the fees or other costs for the services of other agencies, persons, or organizations for intellectual property management and licensing services; or (v) for scientific research and development consistent with the research and development missions and objectives of the DOD laboratory. (C) All royalties or other payments retained by the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory after payments have been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) that are unobligated and unexpended at the end of the second fiscal year succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties and other payments were received shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. (2) Exception If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A), the balance of the royalties or other payments received by the Department of Defense or the military department in any fiscal year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by the DOD laboratory for research, development, engineering, testing, and evaluation or other related administrative, processing or value-added activities for that year, 75 percent of such excess shall be paid to the Treasury of the United States and the remaining 25 percent may be used or obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any funds not so used or obligated shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. (3) Status of payments to employees Any payment made to an employee under this section shall be in addition to the regular pay of the employee and to any other awards made to the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement of the employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to which the employee is otherwise entitled or for which the employee is otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof except that the monetary value of an award for the same project or effort shall be deducted from the amount otherwise available under this paragraph. Payments, determined under the terms of this paragraph and made to an employee developer as such, may continue after the developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the Department of Defense or military department. Payments made under this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any one person, unless the President approves a larger award (with the excess over $75,000 being treated as a Presidential award under section 4504 of title 5, United States Code). (d) Information in report The report required by section 2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of this section. (e) Expiration The authority provided in this section shall expire on December 31, 2018. 803. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract services Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489) is amended— (1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking fiscal year 2012 or 2013 and inserting fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015; (2) in subsection (c)— (A) by striking during fiscal years 2012 and 2013 in the matter preceding paragraph (1); (B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and (C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and inserting fiscal years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015; (3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking fiscal year 2012 or 2013 and inserting fiscal year 2012, 2013, 2014 or 2015; and (4) by adding at the end the following new subsections: (e) Carryover of reductions required If the reductions required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 are not implemented, the amounts remaining for those reductions in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented in fiscal years 2014 and 2015. (f) Anti-Deficiency Act violation Failure to comply with subsections (a) and (e) shall be considered violations of section 1341 of title 31, United States Code (popularly referred to as the Anti-Deficiency Act). . B Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations 811. Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts Section 818(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1493; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (1) in clause (i), by inserting electronic after avoid counterfeit; and (2) in clause (ii), by striking were provided and inserting the following: were— (I) procured from an original manufacturer or its authorized dealer or from a trusted supplier in accordance with regulations described in paragraph (3); or (II) provided . 812. Amendments relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts Section 818(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking and at the end; (2) in subparagraph (B), at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period and inserting ; and; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) the cost of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts and the cost of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of obsolete parts are not allowable costs under Department contracts, unless— (i) the offeror’s proposal in response to a Department of Defense solicitation for maintenance, refurbishment, or remanufacture work identifies obsolete electronic parts and includes a plan to ensure trusted sources of supply for obsolete electronic parts, or to implement design modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts; (ii) the Department elects not to fund design modifications to eliminate obsolete electronic parts; and (iii) the contractor applies inspections and tests intended to detect counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts when purchasing electronic parts from other than the original manufacturers or their authorized dealers, pursuant to paragraph (3). . 813. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation (a) Defense contracts (1) Amendments relating to contractor employees Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except that the Secretary of Defense may establish narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and manufacturing fields upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the Department of Defense has continued access to needed skills and capabilities. . (2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain contractors Section 2324(e)(1) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (Q) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a covered contractor. . (3) Definitions Section 2324(l) of such title is amended— (A) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): (5) The term senior executives, with respect to a covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated employees of the contractor. In determining the five most highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the determination shall be made using the five most highly compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each component. ; and (B) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7): (7) The term covered contractor, with respect to a fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during the previous fiscal year. . (b) Civilian agency contracts (1) Amendments relating to contractor employees Paragraph (16) of section 4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $763,029 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except that the executive agency may establish narrowly targeted exceptions for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and manufacturing fields upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has continued access to needed skills and capabilities. . (2) Amendments relating to senior executives of certain contractors Section 4304(a) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (17) Costs of compensation of senior executives of a covered contractor. . (3) Definitions Section 4301 of such title is amended by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs (4) and (5): (4) The term senior executives, with respect to a covered contractor, means the five most highly compensated employees of the contractor. In determining the five most highly compensated employees in the case of a contractor with components (such as subsidiaries or divisions), the determination shall be made using the five most highly compensated employees contractor-wide, not within each component. (5) The term covered contractor, with respect to a fiscal year, means a contractor that was awarded Federal contracts in an amount totaling more than $500,000,000 during the previous fiscal year. . (c) Conforming amendments Chapter 11 of title 41, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking section 1127; and (2) by striking the item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of such chapter. (d) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred under contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 814. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports (a) Additional cost estimate information required to be included in Selected Acquisition Reports Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C) and (D) as subparagraphs (C), (D), and (F), respectively; (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph (B): (B) for each major defense acquisition program or designated major subprogram included in the report— (i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate; (ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate; (iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted or revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated risk curve and sensitivity of that estimate; and (iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the current procurement cost for the program (as that term is used in section 2432(e)(4) of this title); ; (3) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking and at the end; and (4) by inserting after subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (E): (E) estimated contract termination costs; and . (b) Additional duties of Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation with respect to SAR (1) Review required Section 2334(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by striking and at the end of paragraph (6); (B) by striking the period and inserting ; and at the end of paragraph (7); and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (8): (8) annually review the cost estimates and associated information required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1)(B) of this title, in the Selected Acquisition Reports required by that section. . (2) Additional information required in annual report Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended— (A) by striking report, an assessment of— and inserting report—; (B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by inserting an assessment of before the first word of the text; (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking and at the end; (D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and (E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) a summary of the cost estimate information reviewed under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends in that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk of the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, and recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis of the review under that subsection. . 815. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following: The Secretary of Defense shall also make the determination described in subsection (a)(2) available on a publicly accessible website.. 816. Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts (a) Requirement Subparagraph (A) of section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking proposals; and at the end of clause (ii) and all that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting the following: proposals and that must be assigned importance at least equal to all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined.. (b) Waiver Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) The requirement of subparagraph (A)(ii) relating to assigning at least equal importance to evaluation factors of cost or price may be waived by the head of the agency. . (c) Report Section 2305(a)(3) of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) Not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, and post on a publicly available website of the Department of Defense, a report containing a list of each waiver issued by the head of an agency under subparagraph (B) during the preceding fiscal year. . 817. Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources Section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) A flag of the United States of America (within the meaning of chapter 1 of title 4). . C Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 821. Amendments relating to prohibition on contracting with the enemy (a) Amendments relating to prohibition Section 841(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 126 Stat. 1510) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of a covered combatant command; (2) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of the covered combatant command; and (B) by striking United States Central Command theater of operations and inserting theater of operations of that command; (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking United States Central Command theater of operations and inserting theater of operations of the covered combatant command; and (4) in subparagraph (C)— (A) by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of the covered combatant command; and (B) by striking United States Central Command theater of operations and inserting theater of operations of that command. (b) Amendments relating to contract clause Section 841(b)(3) of such Act is amended— (1) by striking $100,000 and inserting $50,000; and (2) by striking United States Central Command theater of operations and inserting theater of operations of a covered combatant command. (c) Amendments relating to identification of contracts Section 841(c) of such Act is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) by striking , acting through the Commander of the United States Central Command,; and (B) by striking United States Central Command theater of operations and inserting theaters of operations of covered combatant commands; (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of a covered combatant command; and (B) by striking Commander may notify and inserting commander may notify; and (3) in paragraph (3), by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of a covered combatant command. (d) Amendments relating to nondelegation of responsibilities Section 841(d)(2) of such Act is amended by striking Commander of the United States Central Command and inserting commander of a covered combatant command. (e) Amendments relating to definitions Section 841(f) of such Act is amended— (1) by striking the subsection heading and inserting Definitions.—; (2) by striking In this section, the term and inserting the following: In this section: (1) Contingency operation The term ; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) Covered combatant command The term covered combatant command means the United States Central Command, the United States European Command, the United States Southern Command, and the United States Pacific Command. . (f) Repeal of sunset Subsection (g) of section 841 of such Act is repealed. (g) Technical amendments (1) Conforming amendment to section heading (A) The heading of section 841 of such Act is amended by striking in the United States Central Command Theater of Operations. (B) The item relating to section 841 in the table of sections at the beginning of title VIII and in section 2 of such Act is amended to read as follows: Sec. 841. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy. . (2) Repeal of superseded deadlines Paragraph (1) of each of subsections (a), (b), and (c) of section 841 of such Act is amended by striking Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the and inserting The. (h) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall apply to contracts entered into on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 822. Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan (a) Penalties Section 861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Penalties for failure to comply Any contract in Afghanistan entered into or modified after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 may include a clause requiring the imposition of a penalty on any contractor that does not comply with the policies or guidance issued or the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c). Compliance with such policies, guidance, or regulations may be considered as a factor in the determination of award and incentive fees. . (b) Penalty information covered in report Section 863(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) Any penalties imposed on contractors for failing to comply with requirements under section 861(e), including requirements to provide information for the common databases identified under section 861(b)(4). . D Other Matters 831. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4296; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act. and inserting December 31, 2019.. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1845), is amended by striking December 31, 2014 and inserting December 31, 2015. 833. Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on how sole source suppliers of components to the Department of Defense procurement supply chain create vulnerabilities to military attack, terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock, financial crisis, or geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo of key raw materials or industrial inputs. (b) Matters covered The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) A list of the components in the Department of Defense procurement supply chain for which there is a supplier that controls over 50 percent of the global market. (2) A list of parts of the supply chain where there is inadequate information to ascertain whether there is a single source supplier of components. (3) The Secretary’s recommendations on which single source suppliers create vulnerabilities, as well recommendations on how to reduce those vulnerabilities. (c) Form of report The report required by subsection (a) may be classified. 834. Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall issue a report that includes— (1) a description of the impacts of Department of Defense contracting with small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans and small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and veteran unemployment; (2) a description of the effect that increased economic opportunity for veterans has on issues such as veteran suicide and veteran homelessness; and (3) an analysis of the feasibility and expected impacts of the implementation within the Department of Defense of a contracting program modeled on the program authorized under section 8127 of title 38, United States Code. (b) Definitions In this section— (1) the term veteran has the meaning given the term under section 101(2) of title 38, United States Code; and (2) the terms small business concern owned and controlled by veterans and small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans have the meanings given such terms under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). 835. Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of sole-source defense contracts Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall modify the provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2401) to clarify that the authority of the head of an agency (as defined in section 811(c)(2)(A) of such section) to make an award pursuant to such section is delegable. 836. Improved management of Defense equipment and supplies through automated information and data capture technologies The Secretary of Defense shall improve the management of defense equipment and supplies throughout their life cycles by adopting and implementing Item Unique Identification (IUID), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), biometrics, and other automated information and data capture (AIDC) technologies for the tracking, management, and accountability for assets deployed across the Department of Defense. 837. Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to take into account sourcing laws Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to implement the requirements imposed by sections 129, 129a, 2330a, 2461, and 2463 of title 10, United States Code. 838. Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in United States None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to purchase military coins that are not produced in the United States. 839. Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces (a) Requirement Section 418 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) (1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such footwear directly to the members instead of providing a cash allowance to the members for the purchase of such footwear. (2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the requirements of section 2533a of title 10, without regard to the applicability of any simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any other provision of law). (3) This subsection does not prohibit the provision of a cash allowance to a member described in paragraph (1) for the purchase of athletic footwear if such footwear— (A) is medically required to meet unique physiological needs of the member; and (B) cannot be met with athletic footwear that complies with the requirements of this subsection. . (b) Certification The amendment made by subsection (a) shall not take effect until the Secretary of Defense certifies that there are at least two sources that can provide athletic footwear to the Department of Defense that is 100 percent compliant with section 2533a of title 10, United States Code. IX Department of Defense Organization and Management A Department of Defense Management 901. Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps (a) Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps (1) Redesignation of Military Department The military department designated as the Department of the Navy is redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. (2) Redesignation of Secretary and Other Statutory Offices (A) Secretary The position of the Secretary of the Navy is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps. (B) Other statutory offices The positions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively. (b) Conforming amendments to title 10, United States Code (1) Definition of Military Department Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (8) The term military department means the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the Department of the Air Force. . (2) Organization of Department The text of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as follows: The Department of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.. (3) Position of Secretary Section 5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking There is a Secretary of the Navy and inserting There is a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps. (4) Chapter Headings (A) The heading of chapter 503 of such title is amended to read as follows: 503 Department of the Navy and Marine Corps . (B) The heading of chapter 507 of such title is amended to read as follows: 507 Composition of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps . (5) Other Amendments (A) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Department of the Navy and Secretary of the Navy each place they appear other than as specified in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (4) (including in section headings, subsection captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and inserting Department of the Navy and Marine Corps and Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively, in each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter stricken. (B) (i) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and inserting Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps. (ii) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by inserting and Marine Corps after of the Navy, with the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter amended. (c) Other provisions of law and other references (1) Title 37, United States Code Title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking Department of the Navy and Secretary of the Navy each place they appear and inserting Department of the Navy and Marine Corps and Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively. (2) Other References Any reference in any law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in subsection (a)(2) shall be considered to be a reference to that office as redesignated by that section. (d) Effective date This section and the amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 902. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise architecture Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking defense business enterprise architecture and inserting target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3); (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) by striking existing as of September 30, 2011 (known as legacy systems) that will not be part of the defense business enterprise architecture and inserting that will be phased out of the defense business systems computing environment within three years after review and certification as legacy systems by the investment management process established under subsection (g); and (B) by striking that provides for reducing the use of those legacy systems in phases; and (3) in paragraph (3), by striking legacy systems (referred to in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3) and inserting existing systems that are part of the target defense business systems computing environment. 903. Report on strategic importance of United States military installation of the U.S. Pacific Command (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the strategic value of each major installation that supports operations in the United States Pacific Command. (b) Content of report The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, an assessment of the following with respect to each major installation covered by the report: (1) The strategic value of the operations of the installation in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility, including the strategic value of the installation for the global deployment of airpower, military personnel, and logistical support. (2) The usefulness of the installation for potential future missions, including military, search and rescue, and humanitarian missions in a changing Pacific and Arctic region. (3) The suitability of the installation for basing of F–35 aircraft and other future weapons systems in the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. (4) The suitability of the installation for mission growth, including relocation of combat-coded aircraft, Army units, naval vessels, and Marine Corps units from overseas bases. (5) How critical the installation is in maintaining and expanding the North and Southern Pacific air refueling bridge. (6) The availability of the installation for basing remotely piloted aircraft. (7) The proximity of the installation to scoreable, instrumented training ranges, with an emphasis on joint-training. (8) The impact of urban encroachment on the installation and its training ranges. (c) Classified annex The report required by subsection (a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe the matters required by subsection (b). 904. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented United States military installations (a) Report required Not later than March 1, 2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the results of a review of the potential for— (1) effectively consolidating underused facilities on military installations; or (2) vacating costly leased space by relocating Federal Government agency tenants, activities, missions, and personnel onto such installations. (b) Specific consideration of Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented installations As a result of the Federal Government’s decision to emphasize Asia-Pacific security issues and changes in the Arctic environment, the Comptroller General shall specifically evaluate potential consolidation of Federal tenants on Asia-Pacific and Arctic-oriented installations, focusing on Federal entities with homeland security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other national security-related functions that are compatible with the missions of the military installations. B Space Activities 911. National security space satellite reporting policy (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Department of Defense depends on national security space programs to support, among other critical capabilities— (A) communications; (B) missile warning; (C) position, navigation, and timing; (D) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; and (E) environmental monitoring; and (2) foreign threats to national security space systems are increasing. (b) Notification of foreign interference of national security space Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space (a) Notice required The Secretary of Defense shall, with respect to each attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability, provide to the appropriate congressional committees— (1) not later than 48 hours after the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, notice of such attempt; and (2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) with respect to such attempt. (b) Notification description A notification described in this subsection is a notification that includes— (1) the name and a brief description of the national security space capability that was impacted by an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability; (2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign actor, the date and time of such attempt, and any related capability outage and the mission impact of such outage; and (3) any other information the Secretary considers relevant. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined The term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) with respect to a notice or notification related to an attempt by a foreign entity to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national security space capability that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. . (c) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following item: 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space. . 912. National security space defense and protection (a) Review The Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council to— (1) in response to the near-term and long-term threats to the national security space systems of the United States, conduct a review of— (A) the range of strategic options available to address such threats, in terms of deterring hostile actions, defeating hostile actions, or surviving hostile actions until such actions conclude; (B) strategies and plans to counter such threats, including resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and other appropriate concepts; and (C) existing and planned architectures, warfighter requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, or other factors related to addressing such threats; and (2) identify recommend courses of action to address such threats, including potential barriers or limiting factors in implementing such courses of action. (b) Report (1) In general Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the National Research Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to the arrangement under subsection (a) and the recommended courses of action identified pursuant to such arrangement. (2) Form The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (c) Space protection strategy Section 911(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by striking including each of the matters required by subsection (c). and inserting the following: including— (A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); and (B) a description of how the Department of Defense and the intelligence community plan to provide necessary national security capabilities, through alternative space, airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, denies access to, or destroys United States national security space capabilities. . 913. Space acquisition strategy (a) Strategy required The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall establish a strategy to enable the multi-year procurement of commercial satellite services. (b) Basis The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include and be based on— (1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches; (2) an analysis of the risks associated with such acquisition approaches; (3) an identification of methods to address planning, programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such approaches, including methods to address potential termination liability or cancellation costs generally associated with multi-year contracts; (4) an identification of any changes needed in the requirements development and approval processes of the Department of Defense to facilitate effective and efficient implementation of such strategy, including an identification of any consolidation of requirements for such services across the Department that may achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and (5) an identification of any necessary changes to policies, procedures, regulations, or statutes. (c) Submission Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy required under subsection (a), including the elements required under subsection (b). 914. Space control mission report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the space control mission of the Department of Defense. Such report shall include— (1) an identification of existing offensive and defensive space control systems, policies, and technical possibilities of future systems; (2) an identification of any gaps or risks in existing space control system architecture and possibilities for improvement or mitigation of such gaps or risks; (3) a description of existing and future sensor coverage and ground processing capabilities for space situational awareness; (4) an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and available information is being utilized for space situational awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space; (5) a description of existing space situational awareness data sharing practices, including what information is being shared and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are to the national security of the United States; and (6) plans for the future space control mission. 915. Responsive launch (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) United States Strategic Command has identified three needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and dependence on space capabilities as follows: (A) To rapidly augment existing space capabilities when needed to expand operational capability. (B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability. (C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological or operational innovations to increase the advantage of the United States. (2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist in addressing such needs of the combatant commands. (b) Study The Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch efforts. Such study shall include— (1) a review of existing and past operationally responsive, low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or industry; (2) a technology assessment of various methods to develop an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and (3) an assessment of the viability of greater utilization of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload adapters on existing launch vehicles. (c) Report Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (1) the results of the study conducted under subsection (b); and (2) a consolidated plan for development within the Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability. C Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities (a) Period for required audits Section 432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by striking annually and inserting biennially; and (2) in the second sentence, by striking the intelligence committees and all that follows and inserting the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 437(c)).. (b) Repeal of designation of defense intelligence agency as required oversight authority within department of defense Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking Defense Intelligence Agency and inserting Department of Defense; and (2) by striking management and supervision and inserting oversight. (c) Congressional oversight Section 437 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking the intelligence committees and inserting congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees; (2) in subsection (b), by striking the intelligence committees and inserting congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (c) Congressional intelligence committees defined In this section, the term congressional intelligence committees has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). . 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) establish a written policy governing the internal coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments to improve identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of Defense; (2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments; and (3) provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on the policy established under paragraph (1) and the gaps identified under paragraph (2). 923. Defense Clandestine Service (a) Certification required Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense for the Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be obligated or expended for the Defense Clandestine Service until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the covered congressional committees that— (1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily to— (A) fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that are unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise unmet; and (B) provide unique capabilities to the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and (2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that will be used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service is employed as described in paragraph (1). (b) Annual assessments Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for five years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of Defense Clandestine Service employment and performance based on the metrics referred to in subsection (a)(2). (c) Notification of future changes to design Following the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection (a), in the event that any significant change is made to the Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly notify the covered congressional committees of the nature of such change. (d) Quarterly briefings The Secretary of Defense shall quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a briefing on the deployments and collection activities of personnel of the Defense Clandestine Service. (e) Covered congressional committees defined In this section, the term covered congressional committees means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (a) Prohibition No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute— (1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget; (2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program budget within the Department of Defense budget; or (3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget. (b) Briefing requirement Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing regarding any planning relating to the future execution of the activities described in subsection (a) that has occurred during the two-year period ending on such date and any anticipated future planning relating to such execution or related efforts. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) National Intelligence Program The term National Intelligence Program has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). (2) National Intelligence Program budget The term National Intelligence Program budget means the portions of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program. D Cyberspace-Related Matters 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical data link systems Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2225 note; Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1885) is amended by inserting and an assessment of vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access or area-denial environments before the semicolon. 932. Defense Science Board assessment of United States Cyber Command (a) Assessment The Defense Science Board shall conduct an assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of the United States Cyber Command. (b) Elements The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A review of the existing organizational structure of the United States Cyber Command, including— (A) the positive and negative impact on the Command resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency; (B) the oversight activities undertaken by the Commander and the Director with regard to the Command and the Agency, respectively, including how the respective oversight activities affect the ability of each entity to complete the respective missions of such entity; (C) the dependencies of the Command and the Agency on one another under the existing management structure of both entities, including an examination of the advantages and disadvantages attributable to the unity of command and unity of effort resulting from a single individual simultaneously serving as the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency; (D) the ability of the existing management structure of the Command and the Agency to identify and adequately address potential conflicts of interest between the roles of the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency; and (E) the ability of the Department of Defense to train and develop, through professional assignment, individuals with the appropriate subject-matter expertise and management experience to support both the cyber operations missions of the Command and the signals intelligence missions of the Agency. (2) A review of the missions of the Command, including whether the reliance of the Command on the Agency for critical warfighting infrastructure, organization, and personnel contributes to or detracts from the ability of the Command to achieve the missions of the Command. (3) A review of how the Commander of the United States Cyber Command and the Director of the National Security Agency implement authorities where missions intersect to ensure that the activities of each entity are conducted only pursuant to the respective authorities of each entity. (c) Report (1) Report required Not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Science Board shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report containing— (A) the results of the assessment required by subsection (a); and (B) recommendations for improvements or changes to the organization, missions, or authorities of the United States Cyber Command. (2) Additional evaluation required Not later than 60 days after the date on which the committees referred to in paragraph (1) receive the report required by such paragraph, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to such committees an evaluation of the findings and recommendations contained in such report. (3) Form The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Intelligence community defined In this section, the term intelligence community has the meaning given the term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense (a) Mission analysis required Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a mission analysis of the cyber operations of the Department of Defense. (b) Elements The mission analysis under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The concept of operations and concept of employment for cyber operations forces. (2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber operations forces, including military requirements for both active and reserve components and civilian requirements. (3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations forces, including through focused recruiting; educational, training, or certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use of short-term or virtual deployments without the need for permanent relocation. (4) A description of the alignment of the organization and reporting chains of the Department, the military departments, and the combatant commands. (5) An assessment of the current, as of the date of the analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations forces. (6) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber operations, depends upon organizations outside of the Department, including industry and international partners. (7) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and continuity of operations for cyber operations. (8) An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve components in the concept of operations and concept of employment for cyber operations forces required under paragraph (1). (c) Report required Not later than 30 days after the completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— (1) the results of the mission analysis; and (2) recommendations for improving or changing the roles, organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities related to the cyber operations of the Department. (d) National Guard assessment Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under subsection (c), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the role of the National Guard in supporting the cyber operations mission of the Department of Defense as such mission is described in such report. (e) Form The report under subsection (c) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 934. Notification of investigations related to compromise of critical program information (a) Notification of investigation initiation (1) Notification Not later than 30 days after the date of the initiation of any investigation related to the potential compromise of Department of Defense critical program information related to a weapons system or other developmental activity, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such investigation including the elements required under paragraph (2). (2) Elements The written notification required under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to an investigation described in such subsection, the following elements: (A) A statement of the reason for such investigation. (B) An identification of each party affected by such investigation. (C) An identification of the party responsible for conducting such investigation. (D) Any preliminary observations, findings, or recommendations related to such investigation. (E) A timeline and methodology for conducting such investigation. (b) Notification of completion of certain investigations Not later than 30 days after the date of the completion of any investigation conducted or overseen by the Damage Assessment Management Office of the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification of such investigation, including a summary of the findings and recommendations of such investigation, an estimate of the economic losses from the intrusion, and any additional actions needed to improve the protection of intellectual property. (c) Report on intrusions after January 1, 2000 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the known network cyber intrusions that occurred on or after January 1, 2000, and before August 1, 2013, and resulted in the compromise of critical program information related to a weapons system, information system development, or another research and development initiative of the Department of Defense. Such report shall include a description of the critical program information that was compromised, the source of each network that was compromised, the systems or developmental activities that were compromised, an estimate of the economic losses from the intrusion, and the suspected origin of each cyber intrusion. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense (a) Updated plan (1) Update The Chief Information Officer of the Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the chief information officers of the military departments and the Defense Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of selected software licenses of the Department of Defense required under section 937 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to include a plan for the inventory of all software licenses of the Department of Defense for which a military department spends more than $5,000,000 annually on any individual title, including a comparison of licenses purchased with licenses installed and of those uninstalled and then reinstalled. (2) Elements The update required under paragraph (1) shall— (A) be done in a comprehensive and auditable format that is verified by an independent third party; (B) include details on the process and business systems necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for validating and reporting deregistering and registering new software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information to the enterprise provider; and (C) a proposed timeline for implementation of the updated plan in accordance with paragraph (3). (3) Implementation Not later than September 30, 2013, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall implement the updated plan required under paragraph (1). (b) Performance plan If the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense determines through the update required by subsection (a) that the number of software licenses of the Department for an individual title for which a military department spends greater than $5,000,000 annually exceeds the needs of the Department for such software licenses, or the inventory discloses that there is a discrepancy between the number of software licenses purchased and those in actual use, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a plan to bring the number of such software licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and the terms of any relevant contract. 936. Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity activities with China None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used for collaborative cybersecurity activities with the People’s Republic of China or any entity owned or controlled by China, including cybersecurity war games, cybersecurity working groups, the exchange of classified cybersecurity technologies or methods, and the exchange of procedures for investigating cyber intrusions. 937. Small business cybersecurity solutions office (a) Establishment The Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the Congress on the feasibility of establishing a small business cyber technology office to assist small business concerns in providing cybersecurity solutions to the Federal Government. (b) Definitions In this section, the terms small business concern has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Small Business Act. 938. Small business cyber education The Secretary of Defense shall establish an outreach and education program to assist small businesses (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) contracted by the Department of Defense to assist such businesses to— (1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats; (2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and (3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such businesses. E Total Force Management 941. Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of Government oversight of functions closely associated with inherently Governmental functions (a) Requirement Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Requirement for oversight or appropriate corrective actions For purposes of subsection (f)(3)(B), if insufficient levels of Government oversight are found, the Secretary of the military department or head of the Defense Agency responsible shall provide such oversight or take appropriate corrective actions, including potential conversion to Government performance, consistent with this section and sections 129 and 2463 of this title. . (b) Amendment relating to review of certain contracts Subsection (e)(2)(C) of section 2330a of such title is amended by adding after governmental functions the following: in which there is inadequate oversight of the contractor personnel performing such functions. 942. Five-year requirement for certification of appropriate manpower performance Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new section (g): (g) Certifications of appropriate manpower performance (1) Beginning in fiscal year 2014 and continuing through fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense, or an official designated personally by the Secretary, no later than February 1 of each reporting year, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the findings of the reviews required under subsection (e) and certify in writing that— (A) all Department of Defense contractor positions identified as being responsible for the performance of inherently governmental functions have been eliminated; (B) each Department of Defense contract that is a personal services contract has been entered into, and is being performed, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations; and (C) any contract for services that includes any functions that are closely associated with inherently governmental functions or designated as critical have been reviewed to determine if those activities should be— (i) subject to action pursuant to section 2463 of this title; or (ii) converted to an acquisition approach that would be more advantageous to the Department of Defense. (2) If the certifications required in paragraph (1) are not submitted by the date required in a reporting year, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall assess the Department’s compliance with subsection (e) and determine why the Secretary could not make the certifications required in paragraph (1). The Inspector General shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than May 1 of the reporting year, a report on such assessment and determination. (3) Not later than May 1 of each reporting year, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the Comptroller General’s assessment of the reviews conducted under subsection (e) and the actions taken to resolve the findings of the reviews. . X General Provisions A Financial Matters 1001. General transfer authority (a) Authority to transfer authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $3,500,000,000. (3) Exception for transfers between military personnel authorizations A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). (b) Limitations The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations— (1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and (2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress. (c) Effect on authorization amounts A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. (d) Notice to congress The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements (a) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) reaffirms the findings of the Panel on Defense Financial Management and Auditability Reform of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; (2) points to the Government Accountability Office’s most recent High Risk List recommendations; (3) is encouraged by the important progress the Department of Defense has made in achieving auditability; and (4) stands ready to continue helping in this effort. (b) Sense of Congress on DOD financial management reform It is the sense of Congress that, in the aftermath of the effects of sequestration as enacted by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), financial management reform is imperative, and the Department of Defense should place continued importance on, and remain vigilant in, its financial management reform efforts. (c) Audit of DOD financial statements In addition to the requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be taken and the costs associated with ensuring that the financial statements of the Department of Defense are validated as ready for audit by not later than September 30, 2017, upon the conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a full audit is performed on the financial statements of the Department of Defense for such fiscal year. The Secretary shall submit to Congress the results of that audit by not later than March 31, 2019. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization (a) Transfer authorized If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 is less than $8,400,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2014 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (b) Notice to Congress In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred. (c) Transfer mechanism Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of law. (d) Construction of authority The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act. B Counter-Drug Activities 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking 2013 and inserting 2014; and (2) in subsection (c), by striking 2013 and inserting 2014. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 U.S.C. 371 note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking 2013 and inserting 2014. 1013. Two-year extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1557), is amended by striking 2013 and inserting 2015. 1014. Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the National Guard Counter-Narcotic Program is a valuable tool to counter-drug operations across the United States, especially on the southwest border; (2) the National Guard has an important role in combating drug trafficking into the United States; and (3) the program should received continued funding. C Naval Vessels and Shipyards 1021. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost to the navy (a) Clarification of transfer authority Subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Authority to make transfer The Secretary of the Navy may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to any vessel stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured vessel, for use as a museum or memorial for public display in the United States, to— (1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth or possession of the United States, or any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof; or (2) any nonprofit entity. . (b) Clarification of limitations on liability and responsibility Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows: (b) Limitations on liability and responsibility (1) The United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity for any injury or damage to any person or property occurring on a vessel donated under this section. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, the United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their officers and employees, shall have no responsibility or obligation to make, engage in, or provide funding for, any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under this section. . (c) Clarification that transfers to be made at no cost to united states Subsection (c) of such section is amended by inserting after under this section the following: , the maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, including demilitarization of Munitions List items at the end of the useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,. (d) Application of environmental laws; definitions Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (e) Application of environmental laws Nothing in this section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, interstate, and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term nonprofit entity means any entity qualifying as an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. (2) The term Munitions List means the United States Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778). (3) The term donee means any entity receiving a vessel pursuant to subsection (a). . (e) Clerical amendments (1) Section heading The heading of such section is amended to read as follows: 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by donation . (2) Table of sections The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is amended to read as follows: 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by donation.” . 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing ships (a) Limitation on availability of funds (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship. (2) Exception Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the funds referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended to retire the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9. (b) Authority to transfer authorizations (1) Authority Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Defense may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2013 specifically for the modernization of vessels referred to in subsection (a)(1). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $914,676,000. (3) Additional authority The transfer authority provided by this subsection is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001 of this Act and under section 1001 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1902). 1023. Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards (a) Nonhomeported vessels Subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking A naval and inserting (1) A naval; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) For purposes of this section, a naval vessel that does not have a designated homeport shall be treated as being homeported in the United States or Guam. . (b) Voyage repair Such section is further amended— (1) in subsection (c)(3)(C), by striking as defined in Commander Military Sealift Command Instruction 4700.15C (September 13, 2007) or Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (Commander Fleet Forces Command Instruction 4790.3 Revision A, Change 7), Volume III; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) Voyage repair defined In this section, the term voyage repair has the meaning given such term in Navy Instruction COMFLTFORCOMINST 4790.3B. . 1024. Sense of Congress regarding a balanced future naval force (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The battle force of the Navy must be sufficiently sized and balanced in capability to meet current and anticipated future national security objectives. (2) A robust and balanced naval force is required for the Department of Defense to fully execute the President’s National Security Strategy. (3) To develop and sustain required capabilities the Navy must balance investment and maintenance costs across various ship types, including— (A) aircraft carriers; (B) surface combatants; (C) submarines; (D) amphibious assault ships; and (E) other auxiliary vessels, including support vessels operated by the Military Sealift Command. (4) Despite a Marine Corps requirement for 38 amphibious assault ships, the Navy possesses only 30 amphibious assault ships with an average of 22 ships available for surge deployment. (5) The inadequate level of investment in Navy shipbuilding over the last 20 years has resulted in— (A) a fragile shipbuilding industrial base, both in the construction yards and secondary suppliers of materiel and equipment; and (B) increased costs per vessel stemming from low production volume. (6) The Department of Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2013 provided $263,000,000 towards the advance procurement of materiel and equipment required to continue the San Antonio LPD 17 amphibious transport dock class to a total of 12 ships, a key first step in rebalancing the amphibious assault ship force structure. (b) Sense of Congress It is the Sense of Congress that— (1) the Department of Defense and the Department of the Navy must prioritize funding towards increased shipbuilding rates to enable the Navy to meet the full-range of combatant commander requests; (2) the Department of the Navy’s future budget requests and the Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces must realistically anticipate and reflect the true investment necessary to meet stated force structure goals; (3) without modification to Long Range Plan for the Construction of Naval Forces shipbuilding plan, the future of the industrial base that enables construction of large, combat-survivable amphibious assault ships is at significant risk; and (4) the Department of Defense and Congress should act expeditiously to restore the force structure and capability balance of the Navy fleet as quickly as possible. 1025. Authority for short-term extension or renewal of leases for vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program (a) In general Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend or renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after the date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an extension shall be for a term that is the shorter of— (1) the period beginning on the date of the expiration of the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which the Secretary determines that a substitute is available for the capabilities provided by the lease, or that the capabilities provided by the vessel are no longer required; or (2) 180 days. (b) Funding Amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance, Navy, as specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may be available for the extension or renewal of a lease under subsection (a). (c) Notice to Congress Prior to extending or renewing a lease under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees notification of the proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall include— (1) a detailed description of the term of the proposed contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and a justification for extending or renewing the lease rather than obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, charter, or services involved through purchase of the vessel; and (2) a plan for meeting the capability provided for by the lease upon the completion of the term of the lease contract, as extended or renewed under subsection (a). 1026. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing an updated comparison of the costs and risks of acquiring DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. The report shall include each of the following: (1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop, procure, operate, and support ballistic missile defense capable DDG 1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile defense radar that would be procured in addition to the three prior-year-funded DDG 1000 class ships, and in lieu of Flight III DDG–51 destroyers. (2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight III DDG 51 destroyers. (3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively. (4) An updated comparison of the program risks and the resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just ballistic missile defense) of the options referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2). (5) Any other information the Secretary determines appropriate. 1027. Sense of Congress on establishment of an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health It is the sense of Congress that the President should establish an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled Energy Employees Compensation: Additional Independent Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program’s Credibility, numbered GAO–10–302, to— (1) advise the President concerning the review and approval of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix; (2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the weighing of a claimant’s medical evidence; (3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements for part B claims related to lung disease regardless of approval; (4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists, Department of Labor staff physicians, and Department of Labor’s consulting physicians and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and consistency; and (5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health to the extent necessary (under section 3624 the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384o). D Counterterrorism 1030. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions (a) Primary and alternate members (1) Number of members Subsection (a) of section 948m of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking at least five members and inserting at least five primary members and as many alternate members as the convening authority shall detail; and (ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: Alternate members shall be designated in the order in which they will replace an excused primary member.; and (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting primary after the number of. (2) General rules Such section is further amended— (A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections (b) and (c): (b) Primary members Primary members of a military commission under this chapter are voting members. (c) Alternate members (1) A military commission may include alternate members to replace primary members who are excused from service on the commission. (2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on the commission, an alternate member, if available, shall replace the excused primary member and the trial may proceed. . (3) Excuse of members Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— (A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting primary or alternate before member; (B) by striking or at the end of paragraph (2); (C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting ; or; and (D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to reduce the number of alternate members required for service on the commission, as determined by the convening authority. . (4) Absent and additional members Subsection (e) of such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— (A) in the first sentence— (i) by inserting the number of primary members of after Whenever; (ii) by inserting primary before members required by; and (iii) by inserting and there are no remaining alternate members to replace the excused primary members after subsection (a); and (B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: An alternate member who was present for the introduction of all evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional member.. (b) Challenges Section 949f of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by inserting primary or alternate before member; and (2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new sentence: Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.. (c) Number of votes required Section 949m of such title is amended— (1) by inserting primary before members each place it appears; and (2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new paragraph: (4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence need not be the same primary members who voted on the conviction if the requirements of section 948m(d) of this title are met. . 1031. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement (a) In general Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting , including engagement activities for program alumni, after effectiveness of the program; (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after program the following: , including a list of any unfunded or unmet training requirements and requests; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) A discussion and justification of how the program fits within the theater security priorities of each of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (a) In general No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by Congress. (b) Exception The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (c) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined In this section, the term individual detained at Guantanamo has the meaning given that term in section 1033(f)(2). 1033. Requirements for certifications relating to the transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities (a) Certification required prior to transfer (1) In general Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual. (2) Exception Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance). (b) Certification A certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, that— (1) the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred— (A) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization; (B) maintains control over each detention facility in which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility; (C) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual; (D) has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future; (E) has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist activity; and (F) has agreed to share with the United States any information that— (i) is related to the individual or any associates of the individual; and (ii) could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies; and (2) includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to the Secretary’s certifications. (c) Prohibition in cases of prior confirmed recidivism (1) Prohibition Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity. (2) Exception Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify Congress of promptly after issuance). (d) National security waiver (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1) or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c) and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, determines that— (A) alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be waived; (B) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with regard to the individual to be transferred; (C) in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and (D) the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States. (2) Reports Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual concerned, the following: (A) A copy of the determination and the waiver concerned. (B) A statement of the basis for the determination, including— (i) an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States; (ii) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated; and (iii) a classified summary of— (I) the individual’s record of cooperation while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and (II) the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for continuing cooperation. (C) A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived. (D) The assessment required by subsection (b)(2). (e) Record of cooperation In assessing the risk that an individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist activity or other actions that could affect the security of the United States if released for the purpose of making a certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable consideration to any such individual— (1) who has substantially cooperated with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and (2) for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities. (f) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (2) The term individual detained at Guantanamo means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— (A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (B) is— (i) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or (ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (3) The term foreign terrorist organization means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189). 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who— (1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and (2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 1035. Unclassified summary of information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly available an unclassified summary of information relating to the individuals detained by the Department of Defense at the Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to represent an enduring security threat to the United States. Such summary shall cover any individual detained at such facility as of the date of the enactment of this Act and any individual so detained during the two-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act. Such summary shall include for each such covered individual— (1) a description of the relevant organization or organizations with which the individual is affiliated; (2) whether the individual had ever been in the custody or under the effective control of the United States at any time before being detained at such facility and, if so, where the individual had been in such custody or under such effective control; and (3) whether the individual has been directly linked to the death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or any United States Government employee. 1036. Assessment of affiliates and adherents of al-Qaeda outside the United States Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives an assessment containing each of the following: (1) An identification of any group operating outside the United States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or otherwise related to, al-Qaeda. (2) A summary of relevant information relating to each such group, including— (A) the extent to which members or leaders of the group have— (i) conducted or planned to conduct lethal or significant operations outside the borders of the state or states in which the group ordinarily operates; (ii) conducted fundraising or recruiting outside the borders of such state or states; and (iii) have demonstrated any interest in conducting activities described in clauses (i) and (ii) outside the borders of such state or states; (B) the extent to which the connection of the group to the senior leadership of al-Qaeda has changed over time; and (C) whether the group has attacked or planned to purposefully attack United States citizens, members of Armed Forces of the United States, or other representatives of the United States, or is likely to do so in the future. (3) An assessment of whether each group is part of or substantially supporting al-Qaeda or the Taliban, or constitutes an associated force that is engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners for purposes of interpreting the scope of section 2 of the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 115 Stat. 224; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). (4) The criteria used to determine the nature and extent of each group’s relationship to al-Qaeda. 1037. Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) designate a senior official of the Department of Defense as the official with principal responsibility for coordination and management of the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and (2) set forth the responsibilities of that senior official with respect to such transfers. 1038. Rank of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo For purposes of any military commission established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in section 948a of such title) who is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor shall have the same rank. 1039. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the capability of the government of Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1033(f)(2)) who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be encountered in transferring individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen. 1040. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that includes each of the following: (1) A description of the extent to which an individual detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States, could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for— (A) relief from removal from the United States, including pursuant to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; (B) any required release from immigration detention, including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in Zadvydas v. Davis; (C) asylum or withholding of removal; or (D) any additional constitutional right. (2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which the Secretary and Attorney General determine such an individual could become eligible if so transferred, a description of the reasoning behind such determination and an explanation of the nature of the right. 1040A. Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall make publicly available a summary of information relating to individuals who were formerly detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who have, since being transferred or released from such detention, have become leaders or involved in the leadership structure of a foreign terrorist group. (b) Form of summary The summary required under subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. The Secretary of Defense shall submit any such classified annex to the congressional defense committees. 1040B. Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (a) Availability of writ of habeas corpus Nothing in the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any other law, shall be construed to deny the availability of the writ of habeas corpus to any United States citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). (b) Procedures In any habeas proceeding brought by a United States citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), the government shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that such citizen is an unprivileged enemy belligerent and there shall be no presumption that any evidence presented by the government as justification for the apprehension and subsequent detention is accurate and authentic. 1040C. Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense may be used to provide additional or upgraded recreational facilities for individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 1040D. Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen None of the amounts authorized to be available to the Department of Defense may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release, during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, any individual detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1033(f)(2)) to the custody or control of the Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen. E Sensitive Military Operations 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations (a) Notification required (1) In general Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations (a) In general The Secretary of Defense shall promptly submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing of any sensitive military operation following such operation. (b) Procedures (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and submit to the congressional defense committees procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection (a) consistent with the national security of the United States and the protection of operational integrity. (2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure that committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to national security of the United States are sufficient to protect the information that is submitted to the committees pursuant to this section. (c) Sensitive military operation defined The term sensitive military operation means a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the United States pursuant to— (1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or (2) any other authority except— (A) a declaration of war; or (B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of force other than the authorization referred to in paragraph (1). (d) Exception The notification requirement under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive military operation executed within the territory of Afghanistan pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). (e) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide any new authority or to alter or otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.), the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), or any requirement under the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.). . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 130e the following new item: 130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military operations. . (b) Effective date Section 130f of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to any sensitive military operation (as defined in subsection (c) of such section) executed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Deadline for submittal of procedures The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1042. Report on process for determining targets of lethal operations Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval processes used in determining whether an individual or group of individuals could be the target of a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United States outside the United States. 1043. Counterterrorism operational briefings (a) Briefings required Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations (a) Briefings Required The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities. (b) Elements Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) A global update on activity within each geographic combatant command. (2) An overview of authorities and legal issues including limitations. (3) An outline of interagency activities and initiatives. (4) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 492. Quarterly briefings: counterterrorism operations. . F Nuclear Forces 1051. Prohibition on elimination of the nuclear triad (a) Prohibition on triad reductions None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system if such reduction, conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a leg of the nuclear triad. (b) Nuclear triad defined The term nuclear triad means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States composed of the following: (1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. (2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated ballistic missile submarines. (3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers. 1052. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction of nuclear forces (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to carry out reductions to the nuclear forces of the United States required by the New START Treaty until— (1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees the plan required by section 1042(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1575); and (2) the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that any further reductions to such forces that result in such forces being reduced below the level required by the New START Treaty will be carried out only pursuant to— (A) a treaty or international agreement specifically approved with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; or (B) an Act of Congress specifically authorizing such reductions. (b) Exception The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to the following: (1) Reductions made to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile and strategic delivery systems, including activities related to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery systems. (2) Nuclear warheads that are retired or awaiting dismantlement on the date of the enactment of this Act. (3) Inspections carried out pursuant to the New START Treaty. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (A) The congressional defense committees. (B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (2) The term New START Treaty means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011. 1053. Limitation on availability of funds for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be used to reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe until a period of 90 days has elapsed after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that— (1) the Russian Federation has carried out similar reductions or consolidations with respect to dual-capable aircraft of Russia; (2) the Secretary has consulted with the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with respect to the planned reduction or consolidation of the Secretary; and (3) there is a consensus among such member states in support of such planned reduction or consolidation. (b) Dual-capable aircraft defined In this section, the term dual-capable aircraft means aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions. 1054. Statement of policy on implementation of any agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the New START Treaty; limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic delivery systems (a) Finding; statement of policy (1) Finding Congress finds that it was the Declaration of the United States Senate in its Resolution of Advice and Consent to the New START Treaty that [t]he Senate declares that further arms reduction agreements obligating the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in any militarily significant manner may be made only pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States. (2) Statement of policy Congress reaffirms the Declaration described in paragraph (1) and states that any agreement for further arms reduction below the levels of the New START Treaty, including those that may seek to use the Treaty’s verification regime, may only be made pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States or by Act of Congress, as set forth in the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.). (b) Limitation (1) In general None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle if such action reduces the number of covered strategic delivery vehicles to less than the 800 required to implement the New START Treaty. (2) Waiver In accordance with subsection (c), the President may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees written notification that— (A) the Senate has given its advice and consent to ratification of a nuclear arms reduction treaty with the Russian Federation that requires Russia to significantly and proportionally reduce its number of nonstrategic nuclear warheads, or an international agreement for such purpose is entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress as set forth in the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2551 et seq.); (B) such treaty or agreement has entered into force; and (C) such waiver is required during such fiscal year to implement such treaty or agreement. (c) Additional limitations (1) Certain compliance of nuclear arms control agreements If the President makes a waiver under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle until 30 days elapses following the date on which the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees and the congressional intelligence committees written certification that the Russian Federation is in compliance with its nuclear arms control agreements and obligations with the United States. (2) Certain intelligence If the President makes a waiver under subsection (b)(2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, or prepare to retire, dismantle, or deactivate, any covered strategic delivery vehicle in accordance with a treaty or international agreement entered into pursuant to an Act of Congress requiring such actions unless the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees and the congressional intelligence committees written certification that the intelligence community has high confidence judgments with respect to— (A) the nuclear weapons production capacity of the People’s Republic of China; (B) the nature, number, location, and targetability of the nuclear weapons and strategic delivery systems of China; and (C) the nuclear doctrine of China. (d) Exception The limitations in subsection (b) and (c) shall not apply to reductions made to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the nuclear weapons stockpile and strategic delivery systems of the United States, including activities related to surveillance, assessment, certification, testing, and maintenance of nuclear warheads and strategic delivery system. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (A) The congressional defense committees. (B) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (2) The term congressional intelligence committees means the following: (A) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. (3) The term covered strategic delivery vehicle means the following: (A) B–52H bomber aircraft. (B) B–2 Spirit bomber aircraft. (C) Trident ballistic missile submarines. (D) Trident II D5 submarine launched ballistic missiles. (E) Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles. (4) The term New START Treaty means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011. 1055. Sense of congress on compliance with nuclear arms control agreements (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) President Obama stated in Prague in April 2009 that Rules must be binding. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.. (2) President Obama’s Nuclear Posture Review of 2010 stated, it is not enough to detect non-compliance; violators must know that they will face consequences when they are caught.. (3) The July 2010 Verifiability Assessment released by the Department of State on the New START Treaty stated, The costs and risks of Russian cheating or breakout, on the other hand, would likely be very significant. In addition to the financial and international political costs of such an action, any Russian leader considering cheating or breakout from the New START Treaty would have to consider that the United States will retain the ability to upload large numbers of additional nuclear warheads on both bombers and missiles under the New START, which would provide the ability for a timely and very significant U.S. response.. (4) Subsection (a) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the New START Treaty of the Senate, agreed to on December 22, 2010, listed conditions of the Senate to the ratification of the New START Treaty that are binding upon the President, including the condition under paragraph (1)(B) of such subsection that requires the President to take certain actions in response to actions by the Russian Federation that are in violation of or inconsistent with such treaty, including to seek on an urgent basis a meeting with the Russian Federation at the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing the Russian Federation into full compliance with its obligations under the New START Treaty. (5) The Obama Administration demonstrated that violations of treaty obligations by other parties require corresponding action by the United States when, on November 22, 2011, the Department of State announced that the United States would cease carrying out certain obligations under the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty with regard to Russia. This announcement in the CFE Treaty’s implementation group comes after the United States and NATO Allies have tried over the past 4 years to find a diplomatic solution following Russia’s decision in 2007 to cease implementation with respect to all other 29 CFE States. Since then, Russia has refused to accept inspections and ceased to provide information to other CFE Treaty parties on its military forces as required by the Treaty.. (6) On October 17, 2012, the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives wrote a classified letter to the President stating their concerns about a major arms control violation by the Russian Federation. (7) The Chairmen followed up their classified letter with unclassified letters on February 14 and April 12, 2013—in their latest letter, the Chairmen stated that they expect the Administration to directly confront the Russian violations and circumventions of this and other treaties…[we] further ask, again, for your engagement in correcting this behavior. We also seek your commitment not to undertake further reductions to the U.S. nuclear deterrent or extended deterrent until this Russian behavior is corrected. We are in full agreement with your policy as you articulated it in Prague four years ago this month, rules must be binding, Violations must be punished. Words must mean something.. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that the President should consider not seeking to further limit or reduce the nuclear forces of the United States, including by negotiation, with a foreign country that remains in active noncompliance with existing nuclear arms obligations, such as the Russian Federation. (c) Obligations of the president in the event of noncompliance If the President determines that a foreign country is not in compliance with its obligations under a nuclear arms control agreement, treaty, or commitment to which the United States is a party or in which the United States is a participating government, including the Missile Technology Control Regime, the President shall— (1) immediately consult with Congress regarding the implications of such noncompliance for— (A) the viability of such agreement, treaty, or commitment; and (B) the national security interests of the United States and the allies of the United States; (2) submit to Congress a plan concerning the diplomatic strategy of the President to engage such foreign country at the highest diplomatic level with the objective of bringing such country into full compliance with such obligations; and (3) at the earliest date practicable following the submission of the plan under paragraph (2), submit to Congress a report detailing— (A) whether adherence by the United States to such obligation remains in the national security interests of the United States or the allies of the United States; and (B) how the United States will redress the effect of such noncompliance to the national security interests of the United States or such allies. 1056. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (a) Deployment capability The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of— (1) deploying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such missiles; and (2) commencing such deployment not later than 270 days after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary. (b) Warhead capability The Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall ensure that— (1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed as multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with respect to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles, and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such missiles; and (2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not later than 270 days after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary. 1057. Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic of China Section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1933) is amended— (1) in paragraph (4), by striking August 15, 2013 and inserting August 15, 2014; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense notifies the appropriate congressional committees that the Secretary has entered into an agreement under paragraph (1) with a federally funded research and development center. . 1058. Cost estimates for nuclear weapons Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as amended by section 1041 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1931), is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(F), by inserting personnel, after maintenance,; and (2) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period at the end the following: , including how and which locations were counted. 1059. Report on New START Treaty Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on whether the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D)(ii)) of title 10, United States Code) is in the national security interests of the United States. G Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 1061. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze captured records (a) In general Chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 426 the following new section: 427. Conflict Records Research Center (a) Center Authorized The Secretary of Defense may establish a center to be known as the Conflict Records Research Center (in this section referred to as the Center). (b) Purposes The purposes of the Center shall be the following: (1) To establish a digital research database including translations and to facilitate research and analysis of records captured from countries, organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile to the United States, with rigid adherence to academic freedom and integrity. (2) Consistent with the protection of national security information, personally identifiable information, and intelligence sources and methods, to make a significant portion of these records available to researchers as quickly and responsibly as possible while taking into account the integrity of the academic process and risks to innocents or third parties. (3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis to increase the understanding of factors related to international relations, counterterrorism, and conventional and unconventional warfare and, ultimately, enhance national security. (4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad national security communities, both domestic and international, on research, conferences, seminars, and other information exchanges to identify topics of importance for the leadership of the United States Government and the scholarly community. (c) Concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence The Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence to the extent the efforts and activities of the Center involve the entities referred to in subsection (b)(4). (d) Support From Other United States Government Departments or Agencies The head of any non-Department of Defense department or agency of the United States Government may— (1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services, including personnel support, to support the operations of the Center; and (2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support the operations of the Center. (e) Acceptance of Gifts and Donations (1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for purposes of defraying the costs or enhancing the operations of the Center. (2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the following: (A) The government of a State or a political subdivision of a State. (B) The government of a foreign country. (C) A foundation or other charitable organization, including a foundation or charitable organization that is organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country. (D) Any source in the private sector of the United States or a foreign country. (3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under this subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would compromise or appear to compromise— (A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any employee of the Department, or any member of the armed forces to carry out the responsibility or duty of the Department in a fair and objective manner; or (B) the integrity of any program of the Department or of any person involved in such a program. (4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting forth the criteria to be used in determining the applicability of paragraph (3) to any proposed gift or donation under this subsection. (f) Crediting of Funds Transferred or Accepted Funds transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under this section shall be credited to appropriations available to the Department of Defense for the Center, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain available until expended. (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term captured record means a document, audio file, video file, or other material captured during combat operations from countries, organizations, or individuals, now or once hostile to the United States. (2) The term gift or donation means any gift or donation of funds, materials (including research materials), real or personal property, or services (including lecture services and faculty services). . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 426 the following new item: 427. Conflict Records Research Center. . 1062. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate (a) In general Section 2642(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking airlift each place it appears and inserting transportation; and (2) in paragraph (3)— (A) by striking October 28, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2019; (B) by inserting and military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales after Department of Defense; and (C) by striking air industry and inserting transportation industry. (b) Technical amendment The heading for such section is amended by striking Airlift and inserting Transportation. (c) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2642 and inserting the following new item: 2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use of Department of Defense reimbursement rates. . 1063. Limitation on availability of funds for modification of force structure of the Army None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of the Army may be used to modify the force structure or basing strategy of the Army until the Secretary of the Army— (1) submits to Congress the report on force structure required by section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943); and (2) provides to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the most recent force mix analysis conducted by the Secretary, including— (A) the assumptions and scenarios used to determine the type and mix of Brigade Combat Teams; (B) the rationale for the recommended force mix; and (C) the risks involved with the recommended force mix. 1064. Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense by this Act or any other Act may be obligated or expended on any public-private cooperation activity undertaken by a combatant command until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the report on the conclusions of the Defense Business Board that the Secretary was directed to provide under the Report of the Committee on Armed Services to accompany H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (House Report 112–479). 1065. Unmanned aircraft joint training and usage plan (a) Methods The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration jointly shall develop and implement plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities to the Department of Defense to meet the future requirements of combatant commanders and domestically to strengthen international border security. (b) Report Not later than 270 days after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the status of the development of the plans and procedures required under subsection (a), including a cost benefit analysis of the shared expenses between the Department of Defense and other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans. H Studies and Reports 1071. Oversight of combat support agencies Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting and the congressional defense committees after the Secretary of Defense. 1072. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (3), by striking and at the end; (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting ; and; and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate and improve research, development, test, and evaluation for humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance methods, including the transfer of relevant counter-improvised explosive device technology with potential humanitarian demining applications. . 1073. Extension of deadline for Comptroller General report on assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense Section 1081(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law. 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended by striking December 30, 2013 and inserting December 30, 2014. 1074. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1582) is repealed. 1075. Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 quadrennial defense review (a) In general For purposes of conducting the assessment of the 2013 quadrennial defense review under section 118 of title 10, United States Code, the National Defense Panel established under subsection (f) of such section (hereinafter in this section referred to as the Panel) shall— (1) conduct an assessment of the recommendation included in the assessment of the 2009 quadrennial defense review under such section regarding the establishment of a standing, independent strategic review panel; (2) include in the report required by paragraph (7) of such subsection the recommendations of the Panel regarding the establishment of such a standing panel; and (3) take into consideration the Strategic Choices and Management Review directed by the Secretary of Defense during 2013, particularly in carrying out the responsibilities of the Panel under clauses (i), (ii), and (v) of paragraph (5) of such subsection. (b) Updates from Secretary of Defense In providing updates to the panel regarding the 2013 quadrennial defense review under paragraph (8) of such subsection, or providing information requested by the panel pursuant to paragraph (9)(A) of such subsection, the Secretary of Defense or head of the department or agency, as appropriate, shall also provide information related to the Strategic Choices and Management Review. 1076. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and United States Special Operations Command (a) In General The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the United States Special Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and structure. (b) Report Not later than the date on which the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted under subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis of each of the following: (1) The organizational structure of the United States Special Operations Command and each subordinate component, as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for Special Operations Forces within the Department of Defense, as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act, including the statutory structures and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict within the Department. (3) The roles and responsibilities of United States Special Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under section 167 of title 10, United States Code. (4) Current and future special operations peculiar requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands, Theater Special Operations Commands, and command relationships between United States Special Operations Command and the geographic combatant commands. (5) The funding authorities, uses, and oversight mechanisms of Major Force Program–11. (6) Changes to structure, authorities, oversight mechanisms, Major Force Program–11 funding, roles, and responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense Review. (7) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines are appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and assessment. (c) In general Not later than 60 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such review shall include an assessment of United States Special Operations Forces organization, capabilities, and force structure with respect to conventional force structures and national military strategies. 1077. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (a) Report on collaboration, demonstration, and use cases and data sharing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following: (1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding of unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside of restricted airspace. (2) The progress being made to develop public and civil sense-and-avoid and command-and-control technology. (3) An assessment on the sharing of operational, programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems certification standards, pilot certification and licensing, and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the locations selected to collect, analyze, and store the data. (b) Report on resource requirements needed for unmanned aircraft systems described in the five-year roadmap Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the resource requirements needed to meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems integration described in the five-year roadmap under section 332(a)(5) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The term appropriate committees of Congress means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. (2) The term UAS Executive Committee means the Department of Defense–Federal Aviation Administration executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by the Secretary of Defense and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. 1078. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress (a) In general Subsection (a)(1) of section 122a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (1) made available on a publicly accessible Internet website of the Department of Defense; and . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1079. Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation plan information to Congress (a) In general Section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end, the following new paragraph: (3) At the time of the budget submission by the President for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report containing summaries of the guidance developed under paragraphs (1) and (2), as well as summaries of any plans developed in accordance with the guidance developed under paragraph (2). Such summaries shall be sufficient to allow the congressional defense committees to evaluate fully the requirements for military forces, acquisition programs, and operations and maintenance funding in the President’s annual budget request for the Department of Defense. . (b) Report required Notwithstanding the requirement under paragraph (3) of section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), that the Secretary of Defense submit reports under that paragraph at the time of the President’s annual budget submission, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the first report required under that paragraph by not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Limitation on obligation of funds pending report Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for the office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended before the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report described in subsection (b). 1080. Report on United States citizens subject to military detention (a) Report required The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress an annual report on United States citizens subject to military detention. Such report shall include, for the period covered by the report, each of the following: (1) The name of each United States citizen subject to military detention during such period. (2) The legal justification for such detention of such citizen. (3) The steps taken to provide judicial process for or to release each such citizen. (b) Form of report The report required by subsection (a) shall be in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex. (c) Availability of report The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be made available to all members of Congress. (d) Savings clause Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize or express approval for subjecting United States citizens to military detention. 1080A. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report released in April by the Air Force in 2001. 1080B. Report on long-term costs of operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom (a) Report requirement Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, with contributions from the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to Congress a report containing an estimate of previous costs of Operation New Dawn (the successor contingency operation to Operation Iraqi Freedom) and the long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom for a scenario, determined by the President and based on current contingency operation and withdrawal plans, that takes into account expected force levels and the expected length of time that members of the Armed Forces will be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. (b) Estimates to be used in preparation of report In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the President shall make estimates and projections through at least fiscal year 2023, adjust any dollar amounts appropriately for inflation, and take into account and specify each of the following: (1) The total number of members of the Armed Forces expected to be deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including— (A) the number of members of the Armed Forces actually deployed in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Enduring Freedom; (B) the number of members of reserve components of the Armed Forces called or ordered to active duty in the United States for the purpose of training for eventual deployment in Southwest Asia, backfilling for deployed troops, or supporting other Department of Defense missions directly or indirectly related to Operation Enduring Freedom; and (C) the break-down of deployments of members of the regular and reserve components and activation of members of the reserve components. (2) The number of members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who have previously served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom and who are expected to serve multiple deployments. (3) The number of contractors and private military security firms that have been used and are expected to be used during the course of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom. (4) The number of veterans currently suffering and expected to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or other mental injuries. (5) The number of veterans currently in need of and expected to be in need of prosthetic care and treatment because of amputations incurred during service in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom. (6) The current number of pending Department of Veterans Affairs claims from veterans of military service in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the total number of such veterans expected to seek disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs. (7) The total number of members of the Armed Forces who have been killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties, the total number of members expected to suffer injuries in Afghanistan, and the total number of members expected to be killed in Afghanistan, including noncombat casualties. (8) The amount of funds previously appropriated for the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the Department of Veterans Affairs for costs related to Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, including an account of the amount of funding from regular Department of Defense, Department of State, and Department of Veterans Affairs budgets that has gone and will go to costs associated with such operations. (9) Previous, current, and future operational expenditures associated with Operation Enduring Freedom and, when applicable, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn, including— (A) funding for combat operations; (B) deploying, transporting, feeding, and housing members of the Armed Forces (including fuel costs); (C) activation and deployment of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces; (D) equipping and training of Iraqi and Afghani forces; (E) purchasing, upgrading, and repairing weapons, munitions, and other equipment consumed or used in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom; and (F) payments to other countries for logistical assistance in support of such operations. (10) Past, current, and future costs of entering into contracts with private military security firms and other contractors for the provision of goods and services associated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom. (11) Average annual cost for each member of the Armed Forces deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, including room and board, equipment and body armor, transportation of troops and equipment (including fuel costs), and operational costs. (12) Current and future cost of combat-related special pays and benefits, including reenlistment bonuses. (13) Current and future cost of calling or ordering members of the reserve components to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. (14) Current and future cost for reconstruction, embassy operations and construction, and foreign aid programs for Iraq and Afghanistan. (15) Current and future cost of bases and other infrastructure to support members of the Armed Forces serving in Afghanistan. (16) Current and future cost of providing health care for veterans who served in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom, including— (A) the cost of mental health treatment for veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury, and other mental problems as a result of such service; and (B) the cost of lifetime prosthetics care and treatment for veterans suffering from amputations as a result of such service. (17) Current and future cost of providing Department of Veterans Affairs disability benefits for the lifetime of veterans who incur disabilities while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom. (18) Current and future cost of providing survivors’ benefits to survivors of members of the Armed Forces killed while serving in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, or Operation Enduring Freedom. (19) Cost of bringing members of the Armed Forces and equipment back to the United States upon the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom, including the cost of demobilization, transportation costs (including fuel costs), providing transition services for members of the Armed Forces transitioning from active duty to veteran status, transporting equipment, weapons, and munitions (including fuel costs), and an estimate of the value of equipment that will be left behind. (20) Cost to restore the military and military equipment, including the equipment of the reserve components, to full strength after the conclusion of Operation Enduring Freedom. (21) Amount of money borrowed to pay for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom, and the sources of that money. (22) Interest on money borrowed, including interest for money already borrowed and anticipated interest payments on future borrowing, for Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom. I Other Matters 1081. Technical and clerical amendments (a) Title 10 Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: (1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and inserting the following: 24.Nuclear Posture 491 . (2) Section 122a(a) is amended by striking subsection (b) is and inserting subsection (b) is—. (3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and inserting the following new item: 130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical infrastructure security information. . (4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item: 231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and certification. . (5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking fiscal year of Defense and inserting fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense. (6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the end of the enumerator of section 498. (7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking the date of the enactment of this Act each place it appears and inserting December 31, 2011. (8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting of the Uniform Code of Military Justice after 120c. (9) Section 1401a is amended by striking before the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting before January 28, 2008. (10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period at the end. (11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking the a and inserting the. (b) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) is amended as follows: (1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by striking Section 2366b(A)(3)(F) and inserting Section 2366b(a)(3)(F). (2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively and inserting subsection (f) as subsection (g). (3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking Section 408a(e) and inserting Section 478a(e). (4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking such Act and inserting such section. (5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat.1918) is amended by striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv). (6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat.1919) is amended by striking Section 1031(b) and inserting Section 1041(b). (7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat.1969) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting paragraph (2). (8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking fiscal both places it appears and inserting Fiscal. (9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended— (A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking inserting ; and; and inserting inserting a semicolon;; and (B) in subsection (i), by inserting after it appears the following: (except in those places in which Administrator of FEMA already appears). (c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended as follows: (1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by striking subsection (D) and inserting subsection (d). (2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended experts sexual and inserting experts in sexual. (d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 note), as most recently amended by section 321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1694), is amended by striking subsection 4703 and inserting section 4703. (e) Amendment to title 41 Section 4712(i) is amended by inserting before the enactment the following: that is 180 days after the date. (f) Coordination with other amendments made by this Act For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any amendment made by other provisions of this Act. 1082. Transportation of supplies for the United States by aircraft operated by United States air carriers (a) Department of Defense (1) In general Chapter 157 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2631a the following new section: 2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft (a) Preference Only aircraft owned by the United States, or aircraft operated by or under the supervision of United States air carriers holding a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 and registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, may be used for the transportation by air of supplies on behalf of any component of the Department of Defense. However, if the President finds that the rates charged for the use of those aircraft is excessive or otherwise unreasonable, contracts for transportation may be made as otherwise provided by law. Charges made for the transportation of those supplies by those aircraft may not be higher than the charges made for transporting like goods for private persons. (b) Outsize and oversize cargoes (1) The preference under subsection (a) shall not apply to outsize or oversize cargoes if no air carrier registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet nor any aircraft owned by the United States are available and capable of transporting such a cargo. (2) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, outsize and oversize cargoes are transported by aircraft owned and operated by the United States or by air carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. (3) Not later than March 30 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on outsize and oversize cargo flights. Each such report shall include, for the year covered by the report, each of the following: (A) The number of outsize and oversize cargo flights, including the number of flights and tonnage of each flight, flown both by aircraft owned and operated by the United States and by carriers in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet. (B) For any cargo carried by aircraft that is neither owned and operated by the United States nor by an air carrier in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, an explanation for the use of such a carrier. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2631a the following new item: 2631b. Supplies: preference to United States aircraft. . (b) Other departments and agencies (1) In general Chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 40131. Air transportation procured by the United States Government (a) Guarantee Consistent with the provisions of section 40118 of title 49, when the United States procures, enters into a contract or subcontract for, or otherwise obtains for its own account, or furnishes to or for the account of a foreign country, organization, or person without provision for reimbursement, any equipment, materials, or commodities, or provides financing in any way with Federal funds for the account of any person unless otherwise exempted, within or without the United States, or advances funds or credits, or guarantees the convertibility of foreign currencies in connection with the furnishing or obtaining of the equipment, materials, or commodities, the appropriate agencies shall take steps necessary and practicable to ensure that at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of the equipment, materials, or commodities which may be transported on fixed wing aircraft are transported on privately-owned commercial aircraft that are owned, operated, or otherwise supervised by air carriers holding a certificate under section 41102 of this title and registered in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, to the extent those aircraft are appropriate and available at fair and reasonable rates. (b) Exception (1) In general The requirements of this section shall not apply to any equipment, materials, or commodities transported for the use of the military services of the United States or to respond to a humanitarian disaster. (2) Humanitarian disaster defined For purposes of this subsection, the term humanitarian disaster means a man-made or natural occurrence that causes loss of life, health, property, or livelihood, inflicting severe destruction and distress. (c) Waiver (1) In general The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, as appropriate, may issue a temporary waiver of this section— (A) to respond to an emergency; or (B) if such a waiver is in the national interests of the United States. (2) Committee notice The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall notify the following Committees within 30 days of exercising a waiver under paragraph (1): (A) The Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (B) The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. (C) The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. (D) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (E) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (3) Expiration and renewal of waiver Any waiver issued under paragraph (1) shall expire not later than 180 days after the date on which it is issued. The President, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Secretary of State, as appropriate, may renew an expired or expiring waiver as long as the President or Secretary provides notice to the committees referred to in paragraph (2) in accordance with that paragraph. (d) Regulations Each department or agency of the Government shall administer its air transport operations according to regulations and guidance issued by the Secretary of Transportation. (e) Enforcement The Secretary of Transportation may impose on any person violating this section, or a regulation issued under this section, a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for each violation knowingly committed, with each day of a continuing violation following the initial shipment to be a separate violation. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 40131. Air transportation procured by the United States Government. . 1082A. Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from nonprofit organizations (a) In general Chapter 20 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 402 the following new section: 403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations (a) Authorization of transportation Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may transport to any country, without charge, supplies that have been furnished by a nonprofit organization and that are intended for distribution to members of the armed forces. Such supplies may be transported only on a space available basis. (b) Limitations (1) The Secretary may not transport supplies under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines that— (A) the transportation of the supplies is consistent with the policies of the United States; (B) the supplies are suitable for distribution to members of the armed forces and are in usable condition; (C) there is a legitimate need for the supplies by the members of the armed forces for whom they are intended; and (D) adequate arrangements have been made for the distribution and use of the supplies. (2) Procedures The Secretary shall establish procedures for making the determinations required under paragraph (1). Such procedures shall include inspection of supplies before acceptance for transport. (3) Preparation It shall be the responsibility of the nonprofit organization requesting the transport of supplies under this section to ensure that the supplies are suitable for transport. (c) Distribution Supplies transported under this section may be distributed by the United States Government or a nonprofit organization. (d) Definition of nonprofit organization In this section, the term nonprofit organization means an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 20 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402 the following new item: 403. Transportation of supplies from nonprofit organizations. . 1083. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs (a) Extension of a program defined Section 2445a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (g) Extension of a program In this chapter, the term extension of a program means, with respect to a major automated information system program or other major information technology investment program, the further deployment or planned deployment to additional users of the system which has already been found operationally effective and suitable by an independent test agency or the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the scope planned in the original estimate or information originally submitted on the program. . (b) Reports on critical changes in MAIS programs Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting paragraph (3); (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): (2) Notification when variance due to congressional action or extension of program If a senior Department of Defense official who, following receipt of a quarterly report described in paragraph (1) and making a determination described in paragraph (3), also determines that the circumstances resulting in the determination described in paragraph (3) either (A) are primarily the result of congressional action, or (B) are primarily due to an extension of a program, the official may, in lieu of carrying out an evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense committees, within 45 days after receiving the quarterly report, a notification that the official has made those determinations. If such a notification is submitted, the limitation in subsection (g)(1) does not apply with respect to that determination under paragraph (3). . (c) Conforming cross-reference amendment Subsection (g)(1) of such section is amended by striking subsection (d)(2) and inserting subsection (d)(3). (d) Total acquisition cost information Title 10, United States Code, is further amended— (1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking development costs and inserting total acquisition costs; and (2) in section 2445c— (A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking program development cost and inserting total acquisition cost; and (B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking program development cost and inserting total acquisition cost. (e) Clarification of cross-reference Section 2445c(g)(2) of such title is amended by striking in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d)(2) and inserting under subsection (d)(1)(B). 1084. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting (a) In General.— before The authority; (2) by striking this chapter and inserting any provision of this chapter other than section 44305; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (b) Insurance of United States Government property The authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government under section 44305 is not effective after December 31, 2018. . 1085. Revision of compensation of members of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force (a) Revision Section 365(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat.1705) is amended— (1) by striking shall be compensated and inserting may be compensated; (2) by striking equal to and inserting not to exceed; and (3) by inserting of $155,400 after annual rate. (b) Effective date The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed on or after April 2, 2013. 1086. Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave systems (a) Certification required Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall submit to the congressional defense committees certification that defense critical assets designated as tier one task critical assets (hereinafter referred to as TCAs) that receive power supply from commercial or other non-military sources are protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. Any such assets found not to be so protected shall be included in the plan required under subsection (b). (b) Plan required Not later than January 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for tier one TCAs to receive electricity by means that are protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse and high-powered microwave weapons. The plan shall include the following elements: (1) An analysis of how the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, plans to mitigate any risks to mission assurance for non-certified tier one TCAs, including any steps that may be needed for remediation. (2) The development or adoption by the Department, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, of a standard of resistance or protection against man-made and natural electromagnetic threats for electricity sources that supply electricity to tier one TCAs. (3) The development by the Department, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, of a strategy to certify by December 31, 2015, that all electricity sourced to tier one TCAs is provided by facilities that meet the standard developed under paragraph (2). (c) Preparation of plan In preparing the plan required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall use the guidance and recommendations of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack established by section 1401 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–345). (d) Form of submission The plan required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in classified form. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term task critical asset means an asset of such extraordinary importance to operations in peace, crisis, and war that its incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on the ability of the Department of Defense to fulfill its missions. (2) The term tier one with respect to a task critical asset means such an asset the loss, incapacitation, or disruption of which could result in mission (or function) failure at the Department of Defense, military department, combatant command, sub-unified command, Defense Agency, or defense infrastructure sector level. 1087. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities (a) Strategy required The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a strategy for developing and sustaining military information operations capabilities for future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later than February 1, 2014. (b) Contents of strategy The strategy required in subsection (a) shall include each of the following: (1) A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities that have been developed during the ten-year period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, including such capabilities developed using funds authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations. (2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in paragraph (1) are being integrated into both operational plans (OPLANS) and contingency plans (CONPLANS). (3) An assessment of the force structure that is necessary to support operational planning and potential contingency operations, including the relative balance across the active and reserve components. (4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to support the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as well as estimates for resources that might be needed based on selected OPLANS and CONPLANS. (5) A description of how new and emerging technologies can be incorporated into the projected force structure and future OPLANS and CONPLANS. (6) A description of new capabilities that may be needed to fill any identified gaps and programs that might be required to develop such capabilities. 1088. Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing standards In implementing the sequester required by section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as ordered on March 1, 2013, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all military departments remain fully compliant with minimum safe staffing standards, as outlined in the Department of Defense Fire and Emergency Services Program (DoD Instruction 6055.06). 1089. Determination and Disclosure of Transportation Costs Incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States (a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall— (1) determine the cost of the transportation provided with respect to the Member, officer, or employee; (2) not later than 10 days after completion of the trip involved, provide a written statement of the cost— (A) to the Member, officer, or employee involved; and (B) to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate); and (3) upon providing a written statement under paragraph (2), make the statement available for viewing on the Secretary’s official public website until the expiration of the 4-year period which begins on the final day of the trip involved. (b) Exceptions (1) Exceptions described This section does not apply with respect to any trip for which any of the following applies: (A) The purpose of the trip is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both). (B) The use of transportation provided by the Department of Defense is necessary to protect the safety and security of the individuals taking the trip. (2) Consultation In determining whether or not a trip is described in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Speaker of the House of Representatives (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House) or the Majority Leader of the Senate (in the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the Senate). (c) Definitions In this section: (1) Member The term Member, with respect to the House of Representatives, includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress. (2) United States The term United States means the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other territory or possession of the United States. (d) Effective Date This section shall apply with respect to trips taken on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, except that this section does not apply with respect to any trip which began prior to such date. 1090. Transfer or loan of equipment to the Department of Homeland Security relating to border security The Secretary of Defense may coordinate with the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify and provide for the transfer or long-term loan to the Department of Homeland Security of equipment the Secretary of Defense determines to be excess and the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be appropriate in order to increase situational awareness and achieve operational control of the international borders of the United States. 1091. Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered Aerostat Radar System Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than September 30, 2013, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to accept from the Secretary of Defense, full contract ownership and management responsibilities for the existing Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program and contracts. Neither the Department of Defense nor the Department of Homeland Security shall be required to reimburse the other agency for any services under the TARS program. 1092. Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting border security activities and before law enforcement activities; and (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting , the Secretary of Homeland Security, after Attorney General; and (2) in subsection (d), by inserting border security activities or before counter-drug. 1093. Unmanned aircraft systems and national airspace (a) Memoranda of understanding Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may enter into a memorandum of understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) to allow such entity to access nonregulatory special use airspace if such access— (1) is used by the entity as part of such test range program; and (2) does not interfere with the activities of the Secretary or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of the Department of Defense. (b) Established procedures The Secretary shall carry out subsection (a) using the established procedures of the Department of Defense with respect to entering into a memorandum of understanding. (c) Construction A memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) between the Secretary and a non-Department of Defense entity shall not be construed as establishing the Secretary as a partner, proponent, or team member of such entity in the test range program specified in such subsection. 1094. Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain Federal property Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection: (c) Days for Flag Display For the purposes of this section, POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the flag of the United States is displayed. . 1095. Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the use of improvised explosive devices (in this section referred to as IEDs) against members of the Armed Forces or people of the United States should be condemned; (2) unwavering support for members of the Armed Forces, first responders, and explosive ordnance disposal personnel of the United States who face the threat of IEDs and put their lives on the line to defeat them should be expressed; (3) all relevant agencies of the Government should be called on to coordinate with international partners and other responsible entities to reduce the use of IEDs and curb their proliferation; and (4) the exchange of blast trauma research data should be facilitated between all relevant agencies of the Government. 1096. Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and military reserve force (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The first volunteer militia unit in America was formed in 1636 in Massachusetts Bay, followed by other units in the colonies of Virginia and Connecticut. the American founding fathers wrote article I, section 8, of the United States Constitution to keep the militia model, authorizing a standing military force that could organize, train, and equip militia volunteers when needed. (2) In World War I, nearly all National Guardsmen were mobilized into Federal service, and while they represented only 15 percent of the total United States Army, they comprised 40 percent of the American divisions sent to France and sustained 43 percent of the casualties in combat. In World War II, the National Guard comprised 19 Army divisions and 29 observation squadrons with aircraft assigned to the United States Army Air Forces. (3) On September 11, 2001, the first fighter jets over New York City and Washington, DC, were Air National Guard F–15 and F–16 aircraft from Massachusetts and North Dakota, with over 400 more Air National Guard fighter aircraft on alert by that afternoon. Over 600,000 Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have deployed in the many campaigns since 9/11. (4) Air and Army National Guard soldiers and airmen have been involved in countless domestic response missions, including missions in response to hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and forest fires including the more recent events of Superstorm Sandy and the tornados in Oklahoma. (5) The volunteer National Guard and Reserve have time and again demonstrated their readiness to meet operational requirements through cost-effective means. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the Secretary of Defense should make every effort to ensure the Military Reserve and National Guard forces are sustained by a fully manned and fully funded force and that the United States fulfill its longstanding commitment to unyielding readiness in terms of defense; (2) the Secretary of Defense should act with the knowledge that the National Guard and Reserve are critical components to the Armed Forces, particularly as means of preserving combat power during a time of budget austerity; and (3) Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the National Guard or Reserve and affirms the growth of these components as circumstances warrant. 1097. Access of employees of congressional support offices to department of defense facilities (a) Finding Congress finds that Congressional support offices perform a critical role in enabling Congress to carry out its Constitutionally-mandated task of performing oversight of the executive branch. (b) Access in Same Manner as Employees of Defense Committees The Secretary of Defense shall provide employees of any Congressional support office who work on issues related to national security with access to facilities of the Department of Defense in the same manner, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as employees of the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate. (c) Congressional support offices defined In this section, the term Congressional support office means any of the following: (1) The Congressional Budget Office. (2) The Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress. (3) The Government Accountability Office. 1098. Cost of wars The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 1099. Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and cultures in the building of partner capacity It is the sense of Congress that the head of each element of the Department of Defense should take into consideration foreign languages and cultures during the development by such element of the Department of training, tools, and methodologies to engage in military-to-military activities and in the building of partner capacity. 1099A. Sense of Congress regarding preservation of Second Amendment rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in the District of Columbia (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. (2) Approximately 40,000 servicemen and women across all branches of the Armed Forces either live in or are stationed on active duty within the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Unless these individuals are granted a waiver as serving in a law enforcement role, they are subject to the District of Columbia’s onerous and highly restrictive laws on the possession of firearms. (3) Military personnel, despite being extensively trained in the proper and safe use of firearms, are therefore deprived by the laws of the District of Columbia of handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are commonly kept by law-abiding persons throughout the United States for sporting use and for lawful defense of their persons, homes, businesses, and families. (4) The District of Columbia has one of the highest per capita murder rates in the Nation, which may be attributed in part to previous local laws prohibiting possession of firearms by law-abiding persons who would have otherwise been able to defend themselves and their loved ones in their own homes and businesses. (5) The Gun Control Act of 1968 (as amended by the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act) and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere. In addition, existing District of Columbia criminal laws punish possession and illegal use of firearms by violent criminals and felons. Consequently, there is no need for local laws that only affect and disarm law-abiding citizens. (6) On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, and thus ruled that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban and requirements that rifles and shotguns in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or outfitted with a trigger lock to be unconstitutional. (7) On July 16, 2008, the District of Columbia enacted the Firearms Control Emergency Amendment Act of 2008 (D.C. Act 17–422; 55 DCR 8237), which places onerous restrictions on the ability of law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms, thus violating the spirit by which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller. (8) On February 26, 2009, the United States Senate adopted an amendment on a bipartisan vote of 62–36 by Senator John Ensign to S. 160, the District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009, which would fully restore Second Amendment rights to the citizens of the District of Columbia. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that active duty military personnel who are stationed or residing in the District of Columbia should be permitted to exercise fully their rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and therefore should be exempt from the District of Columbia’s restrictions on the possession of firearms. XI Civilian Personnel Matters 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking through 2013 and inserting through 2014. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1104 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 125 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking 2014 and inserting 2015. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of Department of Defense Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2014 and inserting September 30, 2015. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking October 1, 2014 and inserting October 1, 2018. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the amount determined and all that follows through room and board and inserting an amount determined by the Secretary of Defense. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel (a) In general Section 1110(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is amended by striking 2013. and inserting 2023.. (b) Reporting requirement Section 1110(i) of such Act is amended by striking 2015, and inserting 2024,. 1107. Defense Science Initiative for Personnel (a) Statement of policy It is the policy of the United States to assure the scientific and technological preeminence of its defense laboratories, which are essential to the national security, by requiring the Department of Defense to provide to its science and technology laboratories— (1) the personnel and support services needed to carry out their mission; and (2) decentralized management authority. (b) Establishment of Initiative There is hereby established within the Department of Defense a program to be known as the Defense Science Initiative for Personnel (hereinafter in this section referred to as the Initiative). (c) Laboratories covered by Initiative The laboratories covered by the Initiative— (1) shall be those designated as Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories (hereinafter in this section referred to as STRLs) by the Secretary or by paragraph (2); and (2) shall include the laboratories enumerated in section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), which laboratories are hereby designated as STRLs. (d) Science and engineering degreed and technical positions at STRLs (1) In general The director of any STRL may appoint qualified candidates, without regard to sections 3309–3319 of title 5, United States Code, directly to scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical positions within such STRL, on either a temporary, term, or permanent basis. (2) Qualified candidate defined Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, for purposes of this subsection, the term qualified candidate means an individual who is— (A) a candidate who has earned a bachelor’s or master’s degree; (B) a student enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate instruction leading to a bachelor’s or master’s degree in a scientific, technical, engineering, mathematical, or medical course of study at an institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)); or (C) a veteran, as defined in section 2108 of title 5, United States Code, who served in the armed forces in an engineering, scientific, or medical technician occupational specialty. (3) Rule of construction Any exercise of authority under paragraph (1) shall be considered to satisfy section 2301(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code. (e) Exclusion from personnel limitations, etc The director of any STRL shall manage the workforce strength of such STRL— (1) without regard to any limitation on appointments or any allocation of positions with respect to such STRL, subject to paragraph (2); and (2) in a manner consistent with the budget available with respect to such STRL. (f) Senior Executive Service rotation authority Section 3131 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (5), by striking mission; and inserting mission, subject to paragraph (15);; (2) in paragraph (13), by striking and at the end; (3) in paragraph (14), by striking the period and inserting ; and; and (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (15) permit the director of each Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014) to determine the duration of appointments for senior executives (which shall in no event be less than 5 years), consistent with carrying out the mission of that laboratory. . (g) Senior scientific technical managers (1) Establishment There is hereby established in each STRL a category of senior professional scientific positions, the incumbents of which shall be designated as senior scientific technical managers and which shall be positions classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule pursuant to section 5108 of title 5, United States Code. The primary functions of such positions shall be— (A) to engage in research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and (B) to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities. (2) Appointments The positions described in paragraph (1) may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of the STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the Department of Defense, except that the director of the laboratory involved shall determine the number of such positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 3 percent of the number of scientists and engineers (determined on a full-time equivalent basis) employed at such laboratory at the end of the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which any appointments subject to that numerical limitation are made. (h) Selection and compensation of specially-qualified scientific and professional personnel Section 3104 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (d) In addition to the number of positions authorized by subsection (a), the director of each Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (as described in section 1107(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014), may establish, without regard to the second sentence of subsection (a), such number of scientific or professional positions as may be necessary to carry out the research and development functions of the laboratory and which require the services of specially-qualified personnel. The selection process governing appointments made under this subsection shall be determined by the director of the laboratory involved, and the rate of basic pay for the employee holding any such position shall be set by the laboratory director at a rate not to exceed the rate for level II of the Executive Schedule. . 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel (a) Regulations No later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations implementing the authority in subsection (a) of section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.). (b) Coordination The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for coordinating the preparation of the regulations required under subsection (a). (c) Limitations The regulations required under subsection (a) shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time equivalent or end-strength limitation, nor shall such regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian full-time equivalents, or end-strength. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the armed forces (a) Extension Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2015 both places it appears and inserting December 31, 2020. (b) Repeal of fulfilled requirement Such section is further amended— (1) by striking subsection (b); and (2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by subsection (a), as subsection (b). (c) Repeal of references to certain title 5 authorities Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended— (1) by striking sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 5 and inserting section 3304 of title 5; and (2) in clause (ii), by striking “the authorities in such sections” and inserting “the authority in such section”. XII Matters relating to foreign nations A Assistance and training 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the capacity of foreign military forces (a) Authority Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by section 1206 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4625), is further amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking or at the end; (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) support the theater security priorities of a Geographic Combatant Commander. ; and (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s security forces to conduct counterterrorism operations. . (b) Annual funding limitation Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as so amended, is further amended by striking $350,000,000 and inserting $425,000,000. (c) Notification of planning and execution of funds Subsection (e) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1979), is further amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph: (3) Notification of planning and execution of funds In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2016, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall include the following: (A) For programs to be conducted or supported under subsection (a) (other than subsection (a)(1)(C)) for such fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and execution of not less than 50 percent of the total amount of funds to be made available for such programs. (B) For programs to be conducted or supported under subsection (a)(1)(C) for such fiscal year, a description of the proposed planning and execution of 100 percent of the total amount of funds to be made available for such programs. ; and (3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking Committee on International Relations and inserting Committee on Foreign Affairs. (d) Termination of program Subsection (g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by striking 2014 each place it appears and inserting 2016. (e) Repeal of authority to build the capacity of certain counterterrorism forces in Yemen and East Africa Section 1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1980) is hereby repealed. 1202. Three-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as amended by section 1205(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking 2013 and inserting 2016. 1203. Global Security Contingency Fund (a) Authority Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended— (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting or regions after countries; and (2) in paragraph (1)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking and other national security forces and inserting or other national security forces; and (B) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking and counterterrorism operations and inserting or counterterrorism operations; and (ii) by striking and at the end and inserting or. (b) Notices to congress Subsection (l) of such section is amended to read as follows: (l) Notices to Congress Not less than 30 days before initiating an activity under a program of assistance under subsection (b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit to the specified congressional committees a notification that includes the following: (1) A request for the transfer of funds into the Fund under subsection (f) or any other authority, including the original source of the funds. (2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated program plan for each country to include total anticipated costs and the specific activities contained therein. (3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and anticipated completion date for the activity. (4) A list of other security-related assistance or justice sector and stabilization assistance that the United States is currently providing the country concerned and that is related to or supported by the activity. (5) Such other information relating to the program or activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense considers appropriate. . (c) Transitional authorities; annual reports; guidance and processes for exercise of authority Such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) by striking subsection (n); (2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and (3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the following new subsection: (m) Guidance and processes for exercise of authority The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit a report to the specified congressional committees 15 days after the date on which the necessary guidance has been issued and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b). The Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports not later than 15 days after the date on which any future modifications to the guidance and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) are issued. . (d) Funding Subsection (o) of such section is amended by striking (o) funding.— and all that follows through (2) fiscal years 2013 and after.— and inserting (o) funding.—. 1204. Codification of National Guard State Partnership Program (a) State Partnership Program (1) In general Chapter 1 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 116. State Partnership Program (a) Purposes of program The purposes of the State Partnership Program of the National Guard are the following: (1) To support the objectives of the commander of the combatant command for the theater of operations in which such contacts and activities are conducted. (2) To support the objectives of the United States chief of mission of the partner nation with which contacts and activities are conducted. (3) To build international partnerships and defense and security capacity. (4) To strengthen cooperation between the departments and agencies of the United States Government and agencies of foreign governments to support building of defense and security capacity. (5) To facilitate intergovernmental collaboration between the United States Government and foreign governments in the areas of defense and security. (6) To facilitate and enhance the exchange of information between the United States Government and foreign governments on matters relating to defense and security. (b) Availability of appropriated funds for program (1) Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense, including funds appropriated for the Air and Army National Guard, shall be available for the payment of costs incurred by the National Guard to conduct activities under the State Partnership Program, whether those costs are incurred inside or outside the United States. (2) Costs incurred by the National Guard and covered under paragraph (1) may include the following: (A) Costs of pay and allowances of members of the National Guard. (B) Travel and necessary expenses of United States personnel outside of the Department of Defense in support of the State Partnership Program. (C) Travel and necessary expenses of foreign participants directly supporting activities under the State Partnership Program. (c) Limitations on use of funds (1) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for activities conducted in a foreign country unless jointly approved by— (A) the commander of the combatant command concerned; and (B) the chief of mission concerned, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. (2) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for the participation of a member of the National Guard in activities in a foreign country unless the member is on active duty in the armed forces at the time of such participation. (3) Funds shall not be available under subsection (b) for interagency activities involving United States civilian personnel or foreign civilian personnel unless the participation of such personnel in such activities— (A) contributes to responsible management of defense resources; (B) fosters greater respect for and understanding of the principle of civilian control of the military; (C) contributes to cooperation between the United States armed forces and civilian governmental agencies and foreign military and civilian government agencies; or (D) improves international partnerships and capacity on matters relating to defense and security. (d) Reimbursement (1) In the event of the participation of United States Government participants (other than personnel of the Department of Defense) in activities for which payment is made under subsection (b), the head of the department or agency concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of Defense for the costs associated with the participation of such personnel in such contacts and activities. (2) Amounts received under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the appropriation or account from which amounts for the payment concerned were derived. Any amounts so deposited shall be merged with amounts in such appropriation or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation or account. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term State Partnership Program means a program that establishes a defense and security relationship between the National Guard of a State or territory and the military and security forces, and related disaster management, emergency response, and security ministries, of a foreign country. (2) The term activities, for purposes of the State Partnership Program, means any military-to-military activities or interagency activities for a purpose set forth in subsection (a)(1). (3) The term interagency activities means the following: (A) Contacts between members of the National Guard and foreign civilian personnel outside the ministry of defense of the foreign country concerned on a matter within the core competencies of the National Guard. (B) Contacts between United States civilian personnel and members of the military and security forces of a foreign country or foreign civilian personnel on a matter within the core competencies of the National Guard. (4) The term matter within the core competencies of the National Guard means matters with respect to the following: (A) Disaster response and mitigation. (B) Defense support to civil authorities. (C) Consequence management and installation protection. (D) Response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosives (CBRNE) event. (E) Border and port security and cooperation with civilian law enforcement. (F) Search and rescue. (G) Medicine. (H) Counter-drug and counter-narcotics activities. (I) Public affairs. (J) Employer support and family support for reserve forces. (5) The term United States civilian personnel means the following: (A) Personnel of the United States Government (including personnel of departments and agencies of the United States Government other than the Department of Defense) and personnel of State and local governments of the United States. (B) Members and employees of the legislative branch of the United States Government. (C) Non-governmental individuals. (6) The term foreign civilian personnel means the following: (A) Civilian personnel of a foreign government at any level (including personnel of ministries other than ministries of defense). (B) Non-governmental individuals of a foreign country. . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 116. State Partnership Program. . (b) Repeal of superseded authority Section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is repealed. 1205. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of certain foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region (a) Authority The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide assistance to the military and civilian response organizations of Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Turkey, and other countries in the region of Syria in order for such countries to respond effectively to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region. (b) Authorized elements Assistance provided under this section may include training, equipment, and supplies. (c) Availability of funds for activities across fiscal years The Secretary of Defense may use up to $4,000,000 of the funds made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for a fiscal year to carry out the program authorized in subsection (a) and may provide assistance under such program that begins in that fiscal year but ends in the next fiscal year. (d) Report Not later than 60 days after the date on which the authority of subsection (a) is first exercised, and annually thereafter through December 31, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives an annual report to include at least the following: (1) A detailed description by country of assistance provided. (2) An overview of how such assistance fits into, and is coordinated with, other United States efforts to build the capability and capacity of countries in the region of Syria to counter the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Syria and the region. (3) A listing of equipment and supplies provided to countries in the region of Syria. (4) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State determine appropriate. (e) Expiration The authority provided under subsection (a) may not be exercised after September 30, 2015. 1206. One-year extension of authority to support foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord's Resistance Army (a) Funding Subsection (c)(1) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624) is amended— (1) by striking fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and inserting fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014; and (2) by striking for operation and maintenance and inserting to provide additional operation and maintenance funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces as specified in the funding table in section 4302. (b) Expiration Subsection (h) of such section is amended by striking September 30, 2013 and inserting September 30, 2014. 1207. Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department of Defense (a) In general Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 407, 2557, and 2561 of title 10, United States Code, up to 5 percent of such amounts may be made available to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs conducted pursuant to such authorities during fiscal year 2014. (b) Briefing Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on mechanisms to evaluate the programs conducted pursuant to the authorities listed in subsection (a). The briefing shall include the following: (1) A description of how the Department of Defense evaluates program and project outcomes and impact, including cost effectiveness and extent to which programs meet designated goals. (2) An analysis of steps taken to implement the recommendations from the following reports: (A) The Government Accountability Office’s Report entitled Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed to Manage the Military’s Efforts. (B) The Department of Defense Inspector General Report numbered DODIG–2012–119. (C) The RAND Corporation’s Report prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense entitled Developing a Prototype Handbook for Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense Humanitarian Assistance Projects. (c) Definition In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (1) The congressional defense committees. (2) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. B Matters relating to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 1211. One-year extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations (a) Extension of authority Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further amended by striking for fiscal year 2013 and inserting for fiscal year 2014. (b) Limitation on amounts available Subsection (d) of such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,650,000,000 and inserting during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000; and (2) in paragraph (3), by striking Fiscal Year 2013 and inserting Fiscal Year 2014. (c) Limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan in fiscal year 2014 pending certification on Pakistan (1) In general Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act, and no amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years before fiscal year 2014 that remain available for obligation, may be used for reimbursements of Pakistan under the authority in subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as amended by this section, until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees each of the following: (A) That Pakistan is maintaining security and is not through its actions or inactions at any level of government limiting or otherwise restricting the movement of United States equipment and supplies along the Ground Lines of Communications (GLOCs) through Pakistan to Afghanistan so that such equipment and supplies can be transshipped and such equipment and supplies can be retrograded out of Afghanistan. (B) That Pakistan is taking demonstrable steps to— (i) support counterterrorism operations against al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremists groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in Pakistan; (ii) disrupt the conduct of cross-border attacks against United States, coalition, and Afghanistan security forces located in Afghanistan by such groups (including the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban) from bases in Pakistan; (iii) counter the threat of improvised explosive devices, including efforts to attack improvised explosive device networks, monitor known precursors used in improvised explosive devices, and systematically address the misuse of explosive materials (including calcium ammonium nitrate) and accessories and their supply to legitimate end-users in a manner that impedes the flow of improvised explosive devices and improvised explosive device components into Afghanistan; and (iv) conduct cross-border coordination and communication with Afghan security forces and United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. (C) That Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority groups for their legitimate and nonviolent political and religious beliefs, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim. (2) Waiver authority The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees in writing that the waiver is in the national security interests of the United States and includes with such certification a justification for the waiver. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1218 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1990), is further amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking $35,000,000 and inserting $25,000,000; and (B) by striking for fiscal year 2013 and inserting for fiscal year 2014; and (2) in subsection (e), by striking December 31, 2013 and inserting December 31, 2014. 1213. Extension of Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (a) One year extension (1) In general Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), is amended by striking fiscal year 2013 each place it appears and inserting fiscal year 2014. (2) Conforming amendment The heading of subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “fiscal year 2013” and inserting “fiscal year 2014”. (b) Amount of funds available during fiscal year 2014 Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking $200,000,000 and inserting $60,000,000. 1214. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (a) Limitation on amount Subsection (c) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631), as amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1982), is further amended by striking fiscal year 2012 and all that follows and inserting fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $209,000,000.. (b) Source of funds Subsection (d) of such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) by striking fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013 and inserting fiscal year 2014; and (2) by striking fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may be, and inserting that fiscal year. (c) Additional Authority for the Activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq Subsection (f) of such section, as so amended, is further amended— (1) by striking fiscal year 2013 and inserting fiscal year 2014; and (2) by striking and Counter Terrorism Service. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (C) Up to $279,000,000 made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal year 2014. ; (2) in paragraph (2)— (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking fiscal year 2011 and inserting fiscal year 2013; and (ii) by inserting , or phase of a project, after each project; (B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); and (C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph: (C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for such project after January 1, 2015, including ANSF force levels required to secure the project. Such assessment should include the estimated costs of providing security and whether or not the Government of Afghanistan is committed to providing such security. ; and (3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until September 30, 2015. . 1216. Special immigrant visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies (a) Protection for Afghan allies Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking on or after October 7, 2001, and inserting during the period beginning on October 7, 2001, and ending on December 31, 2014,; (2) in paragraph (2)(D), by adding at the end the following: A principal alien described in subparagraph (A) seeking special immigrant status under this section shall apply for an approval described in this subparagraph not later than September 30, 2015.; and (3) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking 2013. and inserting 2013, and may not exceed 435 for each of fiscal years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.. (b) Special immigrant status for certain Iraqis Section 1244(a)(1) of the Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting on or before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014;. 1217. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan (a) Requirement to withhold assistance to Afghanistan An amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the Secretary of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that the Secretary of Defense certifies and reports in writing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that such taxes have not been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned. (b) Waiver authority The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in Afghanistan. (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance. (d) Department of Defense assistance defined In this section, the term Department of Defense assistance means funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the Department of Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors. 1218. Improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is amended— (1) in section 1242, by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) Improved application process Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, ; (2) in section 1244, as amended by this Act, is further amended— (A) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) In general Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Homeland Security, or, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of State in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, may provide an alien described in subsection (b) with the status of a special immigrant under section 101(a)(27) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 (a)(27)), and shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, ensure efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa, if the alien— . (B) in subsection (b)— (i) in paragraph (4) by adding at the end the following: (A) Review process for denial by chief of mission (i) In general An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval required by subparagraph (A) shall— (I) receive a written decision; and (II) be provided 120 days from the date of the decision to request reopening of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information. (ii) Senior coordinator The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Baghdad, Iraq, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given— (I) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and (II) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in clause (i) receives the information described in clause (i)(I). . (3) in section 1248, by adding at the end the following: (f) Report on Improvements (1) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, to— (A) the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; (C) the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and (D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (2) Contents The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall describe the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), including information relating to— (A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall— (i) support immigration security; and (ii) provide for the orderly processing of such applications without delay; (B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this subtitle; (C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under section 1244 during each month of the preceding fiscal year; (D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months; (E) the total number of applications that are pending due to the failure— (i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; (ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360; (iii) to conduct a visa interview; or (iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; (F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); (G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and (H) a breakdown of reasons for denials at by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission. (g) Public quarterly reports Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed, including information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) of subsection (f)(2). . 1219. Improvement of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended— (1) in paragraph (2)— (A) in subparagraph (D)— (i) by adding at the end the following: (ii) Review process for denial by chief of mission (I) In general An applicant who has been denied Chief of Mission approval shall— (aa) receive a written decision; and (bb) be provided 120 days from the date of receipt of such opinion to request reconsideration of the decision to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information. (II) Senior coordinator The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy of the United States in Kabul, Afghanistan, a senior coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be given— (aa) sufficiently high security clearance to review Chief of Mission denials in cases that appear to have relied upon insufficient or incorrect information; and (bb) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in subclause (I) receives the information described in subclause (I)(aa). ; (2) in paragraph (4)— (A) in the heading, by striking Prohibition on fees and inserting Application process; (B) by striking The Secretary and inserting the following: (A) In general Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under paragraph (1) are processed so that all steps incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required screenings and background checks, are completed not later than 6 months after the date on which an eligible alien applies for such visa. (B) Prohibition on fees The Secretary ; and (4) by adding at the end the following: (12) Report on improvements Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, that describes the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection, including information relating to— (A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall— (i) support immigration security; and (ii) provide for the orderly processing of such applications without delay; (B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this section; (C) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under this subsection during each month of the preceding fiscal year; (D) the reasons for the failure to expeditiously process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months; (E) the total number of applications that are pending due to the failure— (i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; (ii) for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I–360; (iii) to conduct a visa interview; or (iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; (F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); (G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the stages described in subparagraph (E); and (H) a breakdown of reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission. (13) Public quarterly reports Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection are processed, including information described in subparagraph (C) through (H) of paragraph (12). . 1220. Sense of congress (a) Purpose Expressing the Sense of the House or Representatives that the Special Immigration Visa programs authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 and the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 are critical to the United States national security, and that these programs must be reformed and extended in order to meet the Congressional intent with which they were created. (b) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Congress created the Special Immigration Visa program for the purposes of protecting and aiding the many brave Iraqis and Afghans whose lives, and the lives of their families, were endangered as a result of their faithful and valuable service to the United States during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. (2) The Iraq Special Immigrant Visa program is set to expire at the end of fiscal year 2013. (3) The Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa program is set to expire at the end of fiscal year 2014. (4) Despite the pending expiration of the Special Immigrant Visa programs, many brave Iraqis, Afghans, and their families, continue to face ongoing and serious threats as a result of their employment by or on behalf of the United States Government. (5) Between FY08–FY12, only 22 percent of the available Iraqi SIVs (5,500 visas out of 25,000 visas) have been issued and 12 percent of the available Afghan SIVs (1,051 visas out of 8,500 visas) have been issued. (6) As the Washington Post reported in October 2012, over 5,000 documentarily complete Afghan SIV applications remained in a backlog. (7) The implementation of the Special Immigration Visa programs has been protracted and inefficient. (8) The application and approval process for the Special Immigration Visa program is unnecessarily opaque and difficult to navigate. (9) Applicants in both Iraq and Afghanistan often have effusive recommendations from numerous military personnel, have served the United States war efforts for many years, and have served valiantly, in some instances literally taking a bullet for a United States service member, and yet are denied approval for a Special Immigration Visa with little to no transparency. (10) Overly narrow provisions contained in the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 leave many deserving Afghans and their families in need of United States assistance, but unable to access the Special Immigration Visa program. (11) The United States has a responsibility to follow through on its promise to protect those Iraqis and Afghans who have risked their lives to aid our troops and protect America’s security. (12) The extension and reform of the Iraq and Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa programs is a matter of national security. (13) The extension and reform of the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program is essential to the United States mission in Afghanistan. (c) Sense of the House It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Iraq and Afghanistan Special Immigrant Visa programs should be— (1) reformed by— (A) ensuring applications are processed in a timely, and transparent fashion; (B) providing parity between the two Special Immigrant Visa programs so that Afghan principal applicants, like Iraqi principal applicants, are able to include their spouse, children, siblings, and parents; and (C) expanding eligibility for the Special Immigrant Visa programs to Afghan or Iraqi men and women employed by, or on behalf of, a media or nongovernmental organization headquartered in the United States, or an organization or entity closely associated with the United States mission in Iraq or Afghanistan that has received United States Government funding through an official and documented contract, award, grant, or cooperative agreement; and (2) extended in— (A) Iraq through the year 2018, without authorizing any additional Special Immigrant Visas as authorized in the original statue; and (B) Afghanistan through the year 2018, without authorizing any additional Special Immigrant Visas as authorized in the original statue. C Matters relating to Afghanistan post 2014 1221. Modification of report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan (a) In general Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385), as most recently amended by section 1214(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1986), is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsections: (f) Matters to be included: Redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan The report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed description of the following matters relating to the redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan: (1) The number and a description of United States Armed Forces redeployed, vehicles and equipment redeployed, and bases closed during the reporting period. (2) A summary of tasks and functions conducted by the United States Armed Forces or the Department of Defense that have been transferred to other United States Government departments and agencies, Afghan Government ministries and agencies, other foreign governments, or nongovernmental organizations, or discontinued during the reporting period. The summary shall include a discussion of the formal and informal arrangements and working groups that have been established to coordinate and execute the transfer of such tasks and functions. (g) Matters to be included: Assessment of capability of ANSF to provide operations and maintenance functions The report required under subsection (a) shall include a detailed assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide operations and maintenance functions for infrastructure projects constructed for the ANSF after January 1, 2015, including— (1) a description of training provided to the ANSF by the United States and the International Security Assistance Force; (2) a comprehensive evaluation of operations and maintenance capabilities and skills; and (3) the Government of Afghanistan’s financial wherewithal to perform or contract out such functions. . (b) Effective date The amendments made this section apply with respect to any report required to be submitted under section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 385) on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of United States combat and military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan (a) In general It is the policy of the United States that, in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries, and other allies in Afghanistan, the President shall— (1) complete the accelerated transition of United States combat operations to the Government of Afghanistan by not later than December 31, 2013; (2) complete the accelerated transition of United States military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan and redeploy United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan (including operations involving military and security-related contractors) by not later than December 31, 2014; and (3) pursue robust negotiations leading to a political settlement and reconciliation of the internal conflict in Afghanistan, to include the Government of Afghanistan, all interested parties within Afghanistan and with the observance and support of representatives of donor nations active in Afghanistan and regional governments and partners in order to secure a secure and independent Afghanistan and regional security and stability. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that should the President determine the necessity to maintain United States troops in Afghanistan to carry out missions after December 31, 2014, and such presence and missions should be authorized by a separate vote of Congress not later than June 1, 2014. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the President to— (1) modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations of United States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces redeploy from Afghanistan; (2) attack Al Qaeda forces wherever such forces are located; (3) provide financial support and equipment to the Government of Afghanistan for the training and supply of Afghanistan military and security forces; or (4) gather, provide, and share intelligence with United States allies operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 1223. Defense intelligence plan (a) Plan required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a Department of Defense plan regarding covered defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such plan shall include— (1) a description of the covered defense intelligence assets; (2) a description of any such assets to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, to continue to support military operations; (3) a description of any such assets that will be or have been reallocated to other locations outside of the United States in support of the Department of Defense; (4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be or have been addressed with the reallocation of such assets from Afghanistan; (5) the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance plans to operate in the locations where such assets will be or have been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host country agreements; and (6) a description of any such assets that will be or have been returned to the United States. (b) Covered defense intelligence assets defined In this section, the term covered defense intelligence assets means Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan (a) Reintegration activities and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (1) In general None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to carry out the provisions of law described in paragraph (2) until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d). (2) Provisions of law The provisions of law referred to in paragraph (1) are the following: (A) Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392; relating to authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan). (B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan). (b) Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to carry out section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619; relating to the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan), $45,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d). (c) Afghanistan Security Forces Fund Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, $2,615,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (d). (d) Certification described The certification referred to in subsections (a), (b), and (c) is a certification of the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement that— (1) protects the Department of Defense, its military and civilian personnel, and contractors from liability to pay any tax, or similar charge, associated with efforts to carry out missions in the territory of Afghanistan that have been agreed to by both the Government of the United States and the Government of Afghanistan; (2) ensures exclusive jurisdiction for the United States over United States Armed Forces located in Afghanistan; (3) ensures that there is no infringement on the right of self-defense of the United States military mission or United States military personnel in Afghanistan; (4) ensures that the United States military in Afghanistan is permitted to take the efforts deemed necessary to protect other United States Government offices and personnel in Afghanistan as may be required; (5) ensures that the United States military mission in Afghanistan has sufficient access to bases and basing rights as may be necessary to carry out the activities in Afghanistan that the President has assigned to the military; and (6) ensures that the United States has the freedom of movement to carry out those military missions as may be required to continue the effort to defeat al Qaeda and its associated forces. (e) Specified congressional committees In this section, the term specified congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1225. Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or bases in Afghanistan None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended by the United States Government to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. D Matters relating to Iran 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries (a) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation Council countries. (b) Matters to be included The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An explanation of the steps that the Department of Defense is taking to improve the interoperability of United States-Gulf Cooperation Council countries missile defense systems. (2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and restrictions on United States operations. (3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts to long-term, sustainable funding sources. (c) Form The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex, if necessary. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran (a) In general Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2542) is amended— (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking and at the end; (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: (E) a description of the strategy and structure of the global Iranian Threat Network and an assessment of the capability of such Network and how such Network operates to reinforce Iran’s grand strategy; (F) a description of the gaps in intelligence of the Department of Defense with respect to Iran and a prioritization of those gaps in intelligence by operational need; and (G) an analysis of how sanctions on Iran are effecting its military capability and its ability to export terrorism to proxy groups within its Threat Network. . (b) Effective date The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, on or after that date. 1233. Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In response to U.S. Central Command requirements, the United States Navy has maintained, on average, more than one aircraft carrier in the Arabian Gulf for more than five years. (2) In February 2013, the senior leadership of the Department of Defense elected to reduce the number of aircraft carriers deployed to the Arabian Gulf in light of budget constraints and limitation of the overall carrier force structure to support the two aircraft carrier requirement. (3) In reference to the decision to indefinitely delay the deployment of the USS Harry Truman, CVN 75, and the USS Gettysburg, its cruiser escort, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Martin Dempsey stated, We’re trying to stretch our readiness out by keeping this particular carrier in homeport in our global response force, so if something happens elsewhere in the world, we can respond to it. Had we deployed it and consumed that readiness, we could have created a situation where downstream we wouldn’t have a carrier present in certain parts of the world at all.. (4) Highlighting the risks of having only one aircraft carrier in the region and relying on land-based aircraft, General Dempsey stated, When you have carrier-based aircraft, you have complete autonomy and control over when you use them. When you use land-based aircraft, you often have to have host-nation permission to use them.. (5) Addressing the perception of the United States commitment to the region, General James Mattis, Commander of U.S. Central Command, testified in March 2013, Perhaps the greatest risk to U.S. interests in the region is a perceived lack of an enduring U.S. commitment to collective interests and the security of our regional partners.. He went on to testify that, The drawdown of our forces can be misinterpreted as a lack of attention, a lack of commitment to the region.. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) maintaining only one aircraft carrier battle group in the Arabian Gulf constrains United States’ options and could put at risk the ability to have diversified platforms from which to defend the Arabian Gulf and, if necessary, to conduct military operations to prevent Iran from threatening the United States, United States allies, or Iran’s neighbors with nuclear weapons; (2) it is in the interests of the United States to maintain both land-based and sea-based capabilities in the region to project force; (3) land-based locations in the region could restrict United States military options and critically impact the operational capability if required to conduct a defense of the Arabian Gulf because the United States has not finalized bilateral security agreements with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries; (4) as a result of these and other critical limitations associated with maintaining one aircraft carrier battle group in the Arabian Gulf, United States military commanders have expressed concerns about the operational constraints, the increasing uncertainty among United States allies, and the emboldening of potential adversaries such as Iran; (5) regarding the ability of the United States Navy to maintain a two aircraft carrier presence in the Arabian Gulf, the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert, stated, We need 11 carriers to do the job. That’s been pretty clearly written, and that’s underwritten in our defense strategic guidance.. (6) the United States should construct and sufficiently sustain a fleet of at least eleven aircraft carriers and associated battle force ships in order to meet current and future requirements and to support at least a two aircraft carrier battle group presence in the Arabian Gulf, in addition to meeting other operational requirements; and (7) the United States should finalize bilateral agreements with key Gulf Cooperation Council countries that support the Defense of the Arabian Gulf requirements, at the earliest possible date. 1234. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in Southwest Asia Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) is amended— (1) in the first sentence, by inserting after programs the following: and integrated air and missile defense programs; and (2) in the second sentence, by striking post-undergraduate flying and tactical leadership and inserting such. 1235. Statement of Policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 2000, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2012, and 2013, Congress declared that it deplored the religious persecution by the Government of Iran of the Baha’i community and would hold the Government of Iran responsible for upholding the rights of all Iranian nationals, including members of the Baha’i faith. (2) The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, The Baha’i community has long been subject to particularly severe religious freedom violations in Iran. Baha’is, who number at least 300,000, are viewed as heretics by Iranian authorities and may face repression on the grounds of apostasy.. (3) The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, Since 1979, Iranian government authorities have killed more than 200 Baha’i leaders in Iran and dismissed more than 10,000 from government and university jobs.. (4) The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, Baha’is may not establish places of worship, schools, or any independent religious associations in Iran.. (5) The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, Baha’is are barred from the military and denied government jobs and pensions as well as the right to inherit property. Their marriages and divorces also are not recognized, and they have difficulty obtaining death certificates. Baha’i cemeteries, holy places, and community properties are often seized or desecrated, and many important religious sites have been destroyed.. (6) The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom 2012 Report stated, The Baha’i community faces severe economic pressure, including denials of jobs in both the public and private sectors and of business licenses. Iranian authorities often pressure employers of Baha’is to dismiss them from employment in the private sector.. (7) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, The government prohibits Baha’is from teaching and practicing their faith and subjects them to many forms of discrimination that followers of other religions do not face.. (8) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, According to law, Baha’i blood is considered mobah, meaning it can be spilled with impunity.. (9) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated that members of religious minorities, with the exception of Baha’is, can serve in lower ranks of government employment, and Baha’is are barred from all leadership positions in the government and military. (10) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, Baha’is suffered frequent government harassment and persecution, and their property rights generally were disregarded. The government raided Baha’i homes and businesses and confiscated large amounts of private and commercial property, as well as religious materials belonging to Baha’is.. (11) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, Baha’is also are required to register with the police. (12) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated that [p]ublic and private universities continued to deny admittance to and expelled Baha’i students and [d]uring the year, at least 30 Baha’is were barred or expelled from universities on political or religious grounds. (13) The Department of State 2011 International Religious Freedom Report stated, Baha’is are regularly denied compensation for injury or criminal victimization.. (14) On March 6, 2012, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/19/66), which stated that the Special Rapporteur continues to be alarmed by communications that demonstrate the systemic and systematic persecution of members of unrecognized religious communities, particularly the Baha’i community, in violation of international conventions and expressed concern regarding an intensive defamation campaign meant to incite discrimination and hate against Baha’is. (15) On May 23, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General issued a report, which stated that the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief * * * pointed out that the Islamic Republic of Iran had a policy of systematic persecution of persons belonging to the Baha’i faith, excluding them from the application of freedom of religion or belief by simply denying that their faith had the status of a religion. (16) On August 22, 2012, the United Nations Secretary-General issued a report, which stated, The international community continues to express concerns about the very serious discrimination against ethnic and religious minorities in law and in practice, in particular the Baha’i community. The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran expressed alarm about the systemic and systematic persecution of members of the Baha’i community, including severe socioeconomic pressure and arrests and detention. He also deplored the Government’s tolerance of an intensive defamation campaign aimed at inciting discrimination and hate against Baha’is.. (17) On September 13, 2012, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/67/369), which stated, Reports and interviews submitted to the Special Rapporteur also continue to portray a disturbing trend with regard to religious freedom in the country. Members of both recognized and unrecognized religions have reported various levels of intimidation, arrest, detention and interrogation that focus on their religious beliefs., and stated, At the time of drafting the report, 105 members of the Baha’i community were reported to be in detention.. (18) On November 27, 2012, the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly adopted a draft resolution (A/C.3/67/L.51), which noted, [I]ncreased persecution and human rights violations against persons belonging to unrecognized religious minorities, particularly members of the Baha’i faith and their defenders, including escalating attacks, an increase in the number of arrests and detentions, the restriction of access to higher education on the basis of religion, the sentencing of twelve Baha’is associated with Baha’i educational institutions to lengthy prison terms, the continued denial of access to employment in the public sector, additional restrictions on participation in the private sector, and the de facto criminalization of membership in the Baha’i faith.. (19) On December 20, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution (A/RES/67/182), which called upon the government of Iran [t]o eliminate discrimination against, and exclusion of * * * members of the Baha’i Faith, regarding access to higher education, and to eliminate the criminalization of efforts to provide higher education to Baha’i youth denied access to Iranian universities, and to accord all Baha’is, including those imprisoned because of their beliefs, the due process of law and the rights that they are constitutionally guaranteed. (20) On February 28, 2013, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a report (A/HRC/22/56), which stated, 110 Bahai’s are currently detained in Iran for exercising their faith, including two women, Mrs. Zohreh Nikayin and Mrs. Taraneh Torabi, who are reportedly nursing infants in prison. (21) In March and May of 2008, intelligence officials of the Government of Iran in Mashhad and Tehran arrested and imprisoned Mrs. Fariba Kamalabadi, Mr. Jamaloddin Khanjani, Mr. Afif Naeimi, Mr. Saeid Rezaie, Mr. Behrouz Tavakkoli, Mrs. Mahvash Sabet, and Mr. Vahid Tizfahm, the seven members of the ad hoc leadership group for the Baha’i community in Iran. (22) In August 2010, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran sentenced the seven Baha’i leaders to 20-year prison terms on charges of spying for Israel, insulting religious sanctities, propaganda against the regime and spreading corruption on earth. (23) The lawyer for these seven leaders, Mrs. Shirin Ebadi, the Nobel Laureate, was denied meaningful or timely access to the prisoners and their files, and her successors as defense counsel were provided extremely limited access. (24) These seven Baha’i leaders were targeted solely on the basis of their religion. (25) Beginning in May 2011, Government of Iran officials in four cities conducted sweeping raids on the homes of dozens of individuals associated with the Baha’i Institute for Higher Education (BIHE) and arrested and detained several educators associated with BIHE. (26) In October 2011, the Revolutionary Court in Tehran sentenced seven of these BIHE instructors and administrators, Mr. Vahid Mahmoudi, Mr. Kamran Mortezaie, Mr. Mahmoud Badavam, Ms. Nooshin Khadem, Mr. Farhad Sedghi, Mr. Riaz Sobhani, and Mr. Ramin Zibaie, to prison terms for the crime of membership of the deviant sect of Baha’ism, with the goal of taking action against the security of the country, in order to further the aims of the deviant sect and those of organizations outside the country. (27) Six of these educators remain imprisoned, with Mr. Mortezaie serving a 5-year prison term and Mr. Badavam, Ms. Khadem, Mr. Sedghi, Mr. Sobhani, and Mr. Zibaie serving 4-year prison terms. (28) Since October 2011, four other BIHE educators, Ms. Faran Hessami, Mr. Kamran Rahimian, Mr. Kayvan Rahimian, and Mr. Shahin Negari have been sentenced to 4-year prison terms, which they are now serving. (29) The efforts of the Government of Iran to collect information on individual Baha’is have recently intensified as evidenced by a letter, dated November 5, 2011, from the Director of the Department of Education in the county of Shahriar in the province of Tehran, instructing the directors of schools in his jurisdiction to subtly and in a confidential manner collect information on Baha’i students. (30) The Baha’i community continues to undergo intense economic and social pressure, including an ongoing campaign in the town of Semnan, where the Government of Iran has harassed and detained Baha’is, closed 17 Baha’i owned businesses in the last three years, and imprisoned several members of the community, including three mothers along with their infants. (31) Ordinary Iranian citizens who belong to the Baha’i faith are disproportionately targeted, interrogated, and detained under the pretext of national security. (32) The Government of Iran is party to the International Covenants on Human Rights and is in violation of its obligations under the Covenants. (b) Statement of policy Congress— (1) condemns the Government of Iran for its state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority and its continued violation of the International Covenants on Human Rights; (2) calls on the Government of Iran to immediately release the seven imprisoned leaders, the ten imprisoned educators, and all other prisoners held solely on account of their religion; and (3) calls on the President and Secretary of State, in cooperation with responsible nations, to immediately condemn the Government of Iran’s continued violation of human rights and demand the immediate release of prisoners held solely on account of their religion. E Reports and other matters 1241. Report on posture and readiness of United States Armed Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and the Middle East (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, may have never occurred or could have been prevented had there been an international stabilizing force following NATO-led operations in order to help stabilize the country, build capacity within the security forces, and pursue terrorist groups that threaten the local government as well as United States interests; (2) the attack also highlighted the limitations of the United States military to alert, deploy, and decisively counter a no-notice terrorist attack such as the one in Benghazi, or another security contingency, due to the limitations stemming from United States military posture in Africa and the Middle East and when there is a lack of a layered defense at United States diplomatic facilities; (3) the United States military is more effectively able to respond to terrorist attacks on United States facilities outside of the United States if the responding United States military assets are forward deployed; (4) when an intelligence threat assessment determines that a United States facility overseas is vulnerable to attack, such facility should have robust force protection measures sufficient to safeguard personnel and assets until a United States military response can arrive; (5) the continually evolving terrorist threat to United States interests on the Continent of Africa and the Middle East necessitates that the United States military maintains a forward deployed posture in Europe, Middle East, and Africa in order to be able to respond to terrorist events, or other security contingencies, and to effectively evacuate and recover United States personnel; (6) the United States military, in conjunction with the Department of State and the intelligence community, should continue to evaluate the assumptions underpinning the terrorist threat in order to ensure that it is effectively able to respond globally to future terrorist attacks; (7) the United States military should regularly re-evaluate the posture and alert status requirements of its crisis response elements in order to be more responsive to the evolving and global nature of the terrorist threat, and all United States military crisis response elements should be fully equipped with the required supporting capabilities to conduct their missions; (8) on April 16, 2013, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, testified before the House Appropriations Committee that the military is, * * * adapting our force posture to a new normal of combustible violence in North Africa and in the Middle East; (9) The President stated in a press conference on May 16, 2013, I have directed the Defense Department to ensure that our military can respond lightening quick in times of crisis.; (10) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs should continue to evaluate the posture of United States forces to respond to the global terrorist threat, including an evaluation of whether United States Africa Command should have forces and necessary equipment permanently assigned to the command to respond more promptly to this new normal; and (11) although the Department of State-initiated Accountability Review Board found that the Marine Security Guard program should be expanded and that there should be greater coordination between the Department of Defense and the Department of State to identify additional resources for security at high risk posts, the United States military may be challenged to provide additional security to Department of State facilities due to budget shortfalls, on-going force structure constraints, and increasing operational requirements for the Department of Defense. (b) Report required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the posture and readiness of United States Armed Forces to respond to future terrorist attacks in Africa and the Middle East. (2) Matters to be included The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (A) An assessment of terrorist groups and other non-state groups that threaten United States interests and facilities in Africa, including a description of the key assumptions underpinning such assessment. (B) A description of the readiness, posture, and alert status of relevant United States Armed Forces in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the United States and any changes implemented or planned to be implemented since the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, to respond to the new normal and President Obama’s directive for the military to respond lightening quick in times of crisis. (C) In consultation with the Secretary of State, a description of new or modified requirements of the Department of State, if any, for— (i) United States Marine Security Guard Detachments; (ii) any other Department of Defense assets to provide enhanced security at Department of State facilities; (iii) an explanation of how any new requirements for Marine Security Detachments or other Department of Defense assets affect the capacity of the Armed Forces, including specifically the capacity of the Marine Corps, to fulfill Department of Defense operational requirements; and (iv) an explanation of how any unfulfilled requirements for Marine Security Detachments would adversely impact security at Department of State facilities. (3) Definition In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1242. Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) Egypt is undergoing a significant political transition and the ultimate outcome of this political process and its implications for United States national security interests remain uncertain; (2) the United States continues to have considerable concerns about the intentions and actions of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and whether the government of President Morsi is committed to a pluralistic, democratic Egypt; (3) the United States has a stake in Egypt becoming a mature, pluralistic democracy in which the rights of Egyptian citizens, including women and minorities, are protected; (4) the United States should continue to closely monitor President Morsi’s support for the peace treaty with the Government of Israel, which has been a stabilizing force in the region for over 30 years; (5) the United States military relationship with the Egyptian military is long-standing and should remain a key pillar to, and component of, United States engagement with Egypt; (6) the close military-to-military relationship between the United States and Egypt has been a critical component in enabling counterterrorism cooperation between the two governments to ensure the United States military has freedom of movement throughout the region in order to deter aggression and respond to threats to United States national security interests, particularly in light of the security situation in Libya and the Sinai; (7) the Egyptian military has exercised restraint and professionalism during the unrest in Egypt over the last two years and hopefully will remain a key mechanism through which the United States can support the people of Egypt in achieving their goals for a representative and democratic political system, while promoting peace and security in the region; and (8) therefore, with appropriate vetting, United States military assistance and support to the Egyptian military should continue, even as civilian aid to Egypt receives greater scrutiny as a result of the uncertainty associated with Egypt’s current political leadership and economic policies. (b) Plan required (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a comprehensive plan for United States military assistance and cooperation with Egypt. (2) Matters to be included The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, a detailed description of the following: (A) How United States security assistance and cooperation enables— (i) freedom of movement for the United States military throughout the region; and (ii) the Government of Egypt to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda, affiliated groups, and other terrorist organizations, whether based in and operating from Egyptian territory or the region. (B) The capacity of the Government of Egypt to prevent the illicit movement of terrorists, criminals, weapons, and other dangerous material across Egypt’s borders or administrative boundaries, including through tunnels and other illicit points of entry into Gaza. (C) The extent to which the Egyptian military is— (i) supporting the protection of the political, economic, and religious freedoms and human rights of all citizens and residents in Egypt, including those involved in Egyptian civil society and democratic promotion efforts through nongovernmental organizations; (ii) supporting credible and legitimate elections in Egypt; (iii) supporting the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty; (iv) taking effective steps to eliminate smuggling networks and to detect and destroy tunnels between Egypt and Gaza; and (v) supporting action to combat terrorism in the Sinai. (D) A description of the strategic objectives of the United States regarding the provision of United States security assistance to the Government of Egypt. (E) A description of biennial outlays of United States security assistance to the Government of Egypt for the purposes of strategic planning, training, provision of equipment, and construction of facilities, including funding streams. (F) A description of vetting and end-user monitoring systems in place by both Egypt and the United States for defense articles and training provided by the United States, including human rights vetting. (G) A description of actions that the Government of Egypt is taking to— (i) repudiate, combat, and stop incitement to violence against the United States and United States citizens and prohibit the transmission within its domains of satellite television or radio channels that broadcast such incitement; and (ii) adopt and implement legal reforms that protect the religious and democratic freedoms of all citizens and residents of Egypt. (H) Recommendations, including with respect to required resources and actions, to maximize the effectiveness of United States security assistance provided to Egypt. (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the congressional defense committees; and (B) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (c) GAO report Not later than 120 days after the date of the submission of the report required under subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that— (1) reviews and comments on the report required under subsection (b); and (2) provides recommendations regarding additional actions with respect to the provision of United States security assistance to Egypt, if necessary. 1243. Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) has escalated regional tensions with hostile rhetoric and provocative actions. (2) North Korea threatened a nuclear attack on the United States and a resumption of open war against the Republic of Korea (South Korea). (3) North Korea’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs constitute a threat to the national security of the United States and to regional stability. (4) On April 14, 2009, North Korea halted negotiations regarding its nuclear weapons program when it abandoned the Six-Party Talks with the People’s Republic of China (China), Japan, the Russian Federation (Russia), South Korea, and the United States. (5) On May 25, 2009, North Korea detonated a nuclear device in an underground explosive test. (6) On March 26, 2010, North Korea sank a South Korean naval vessel, the Cheonan, killing 46 South Korean sailors. (7) On November 23, 2010, North Korea shelled the border island of Yeonpyeong-do, killing four people. This was the first direct artillery attack on South Korean territory since the signing of the 1953 armistice. (8) On April 13, 2012, North Korea conducted a rocket launch that failed to send a satellite into orbit. This launch violated United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions 1718 and 1874. (9) On December 12, 2012, North Korea used banned long-range missile technology to launch an earth observation satellite into orbit. In response, the UNSC unanimously adopted Resolution 2087, condemning the launch. (10) On February 12, 2013, North Korea conducted a third underground nuclear test in violation of UNSC Resolution 1718, 1874, and 2087. The test also contravened North Korea’s commitments under the September 2005 Joint Statement of the Six-Party Talks. (11) On March 7, 2013, the UNSC unanimously adopted Resolution 2094, condemning North Korea’s third nuclear test and imposed additional sanctions against the regime. (12) On March 28, 2013, North Korea unilaterally nullified the armistice agreement with the United States that suspended military conflict on the Korean peninsula. (13) On March 30, 2013, North Korea declared a state of war with South Korea. (14) On April 4, 2013, North Korea placed two intermediate-range Musudan missiles on mobile launchers and temporarily relocated them to the eastern coast of the Korean peninsula before removing them a month later from the launch sites. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States and its allies, South Korea and Japan, share the goal of a stable and peaceful Korean Peninsula, free of nuclear weapons; (2) the United States remains committed to defending its allies in the Asia-Pacific region and stability in Northeast Asia requires restraint by all parties from activities that would complicate international relations or escalate international tensions, and international disputes should be mitigated in a constructive manner consistent with established principles of international law; (3) Congress supports— (A) the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in a peaceful manner, (B) North Korea’s abandonment of its nuclear programs and return to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and to International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards; and (C) North Korea’s full acceptance of and compliance with the terms of the 1953 Armistice Agreement; (4) the United States has national interests in security and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, the implementation of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, nuclear non-proliferation efforts, the promotion of respect for the fundamental human rights of the North Korean people, international cyber-security cooperation, and full implementation of United States and multilateral sanctions against illicit activities; (5) the United States encourages China and Russia to fully implement and enforce United States and United Nations Security Council sanctions against North Korea; and (6) the President, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully informed on security developments on the Korean Peninsula. 1244. Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The Republic of Georgia is a highly valued ally of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq. (2) The peaceful transfer of power as the result of the free and fair parliamentary elections in Georgia in October 2012 represents a major accomplishment toward the Georgian people’s creation of a free society and full democracy. (3) However, since the October 2012 parliamentary elections the new Georgian Government has taken a series of measures against former officials and members of the current political opposition that appear to be motivated by political considerations. (4) Over 100 former Georgian Government officials have been charged with criminal violations since the October 2012 parliamentary elections. (5) Similar charges have been filed against members of the political opposition, including Vano Merabishvili, the Secretary General of the United National Movement. (6) The arrest of the leader of an opposition party is especially troubling, particularly its chilling effect on political freedom prior to the presidential election scheduled for October 2013. (7) The Georgian Government has taken insufficient action to prevent further violence against members of the United National Movement and to punish offenders. (8) These actions call into question the Georgian Government’s continued progress toward the creation of a free and democratic society in which basic freedoms, including freedom for political opposition, are guaranteed. (b) Statement of Congress Congress declares that— (1) the United States remains committed to assisting the people of Georgia in establishing a free and democratic society in their country; (2) the measures taken by the Georgian Government against former officials and political opponents, apparently in part motivated by political considerations, may have a significant negative impact on cooperation between the United States and Georgia, including efforts to build a stronger relationship in political, economic, and security matters, as well as progress on integrating Georgia into international organizations; (3) the United States must be unambiguous when democratic backsliding occurs in a key ally after a peaceful and democratic transfer of power between political parties; and (4) the people of the United States and the Members of Congress express their deepest condolences to the Georgian people on the tragic loss of seven soldiers of Georgia in a suicide bombing on June 6, 2013, and the deaths of three soldiers killed in another suicide bombing on May 13, 2013, while they were supporting United States and NATO forces in Afghanistan. 1245. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (a) Limitation None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to plan, prepare, establish, or implement any Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Center (RSCC) or similar regional coordination entities. (b) Exclusion The limitation contained in subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any RSCC or similar regional coordination entity authorized by statute, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations Headquarters authorized under section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2541). (c) Report Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report on the following: (1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of the RSCC concept. (2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each geographic combatant command, to include how such centers have been coordinated and de-conflicted with existing regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches. (3) An explanation of why existing regional centers and multilateral frameworks cannot satisfy the requirements and needs of the Department of Defense and geographic combatant commands. (4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program for such centers, to include estimates of contributions of nations participating in such centers. (5) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State determines appropriate. (d) Specified congressional committees The congressional committees referred to in subsection (c) are— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 1246. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (a) Report Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking November 1, 2012, and November 1, 2013, and inserting November 1, 2013, November 1, 2015, and November 1, 2017,. (b) Update Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (c) Update The Secretary of Defense shall revise or supplement the most recent report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) if, in the Secretary’s estimation, interim events or developments occurring in a period between reports required under subsection (a) warrant revision or supplement. . 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act (a) Appropriate congressional committees Section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and inserting the appropriate congressional committees; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. . (b) Congressional briefing Section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is further amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: (e) Congressional briefing Not later than May 15 of each year, the President shall provide to such committees a briefing on such report. . 1248. Limitation on funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to certain missile defense technology None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for each of the fiscal years 2014 through 2018 for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with access to information regarding— (1) missile defense technology of the United States relating to hit-to-kill technology; or (2) telemetry data with respect to missile defense interceptors or target vehicles. 1249. Reports on actions to reduce support of ballistic missile programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea (a) Disclosure of and report on Russian support of ballistic missile programs of China, Syria, Iran, and North Korea (1) In general The President shall seek to encourage the Government of the Russian Federation to disclose any support by the Russian Federation or Russian entities for the ballistic missile programs of the People’s Republic of China, Syria, Iran, or North Korea. (2) Report required The President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a semi-annual report on any disclosure by the Government of the Russian Federation of any such support during the preceding six-month period. (3) Initial report The initial report required by paragraph (2) shall be submitted not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and in addition to addressing any such support during the preceding six-month period shall also address any such support during the 10-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act. (b) Cooperation of Russia and China to reduce technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile programs of Syria, Iran, North Korea, and other countries (1) In general The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall develop a plan to seek and secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China to verifiably reduce the spread of technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile programs of the Syria, Iran, North Korea, or any other country that the Secretary of State determines has a ballistic missile program. (2) Report and briefings required The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act a report describing the plan required in paragraph (1) and provide briefings to such committees annually thereafter until 2018 on the progress and results of these efforts. (3) Definition In this subsection, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (A) the congressional defense committees; (B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (C) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. (c) Form Each report required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex, if necessary. 1250. Congressional notifications relating to status of forces agreements (a) In general With respect to an agreement on the status of forces between the United States and a foreign country, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days after the date on which the agreement is signed, renewed, amended or otherwise revised, or terminated. (b) Briefings required Not later than February 1 of each calendar year, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the following: (1) Status of forces agreements that the United States will seek to enter into in such calendar year. (2) Status of forces agreements that have expired and which the United States will seek to renew in such calendar year. (3) Amendments to status of forces agreements that the Secretary of Defense determines to be substantial and are likely to be negotiated in such calendar year. (c) Appropriate congressional committees In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the congressional defense committees; and (2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. (d) Effective date This section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to an agreement described in subsection (a) that is signed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 1251. Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The conflict in Syria began in March 2011. (2) As of February 2013, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights estimated that approximately 70,000 Syrians have been killed during the conflict. (3) According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, over 1,200,000 Syrians are registered refugees or persons of concern including, over 66,000 in Egypt, over 145,000 in Iraq, over 461,000 in Jordan, over 462,000 in Lebanon, and over 329,000 in Turkey. (4) Jabhat al-Nusra, a group located in Syria and categorized as an affiliate of al-Qaeda by the intelligence community, presents a direct threat to the interests of the United States and could present a direct threat to the United States. (5) On August 19, 2011, President Obama stated: The future of Syria must be determined by its people, but President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way. We have consistently said that President Assad must lead a democratic transition or get out of the way. He has not led. For the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President Assad to step aside.. (6) The United States is deploying 200 military personnel from the headquarters of the 1st Armored Division to Jordan in order to improve readiness and prepare for a number of scenarios. (7) In a letter from Miguel Rodriguez, the Assistant to the President for Legislative Affairs, to Senators McCain and Levin, dated April 25, 2013, it stated that our intelligence community does assess with varying degrees of confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin * * * We do believe that any use of chemical weapons in Syria would very likely have originated with the Assad regime * * * the President has made it clear that the use of chemical weapons—or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups—is a red line for the United States of America. (8) In a press conference with Israel Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama stated: I have made clear that the use of chemical weapons is a game-changer. (9) In August 2012, during a White House press conference, President Obama stated: We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a redline for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.. (10) It is a threat to the vital national security interest of the United States if terrorist groups, such as al-Qaeda, obtain chemical or biological material or weapons in Syria. (11) At a Pentagon press conference on May 2, 2013, Secretary Hagel confirmed that the Obama Administration is re-thinking its opposition to arming the rebels. (12) On April 11, 2013, responding to a question about the need for a supplemental funding request for any potential United States military effort in Syria, Secretary Hagel stated: Yes, I think it is pretty clear that a supplemental would be required.. (b) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) President Obama should have a comprehensive policy and should ensure robust contingency planning to secure United States’ interests in Syria; (2) President Obama should fully consider all courses of action to remove President Bashar al-Assad from power; (3) the conflict in Syria threatens the vital national security interests of Israel and the stability of Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey, the implications of which should be sufficiently weighed by the President when considering policy approaches towards the conflict in Syria; (4) the sale or transfer of advanced anti-aircraft weapons systems to Syria poses a grave risk to Israel and the United States supports Israel’s right to respond to this grave threat as needed; (5) the President should fully consider all courses of action to reinforce his stated redline regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction by the Assad regime in Syria, which could threaten the credibility of the United States with its allies in the region and embolden the Assad regime; (6) the United States should continue to conduct rigorous planning and operational preparation to support any efforts to secure the chemical and biological stockpiles and associated weapons; (7) the United States should have a policy that supports the stability of countries on Syria’s border, including Jordan, Turkey, Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel; (8) the United States should continue to support Syrian opposition forces with non-lethal aid; (9) the President, the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the intelligence community, in cooperation with European and regional allies, should ensure that the risks of all courses of action or inaction regarding Syria are fully explored and understood and that Congress is kept fully informed of such risks; (10) the President should fully consider, and the Department of Defense should conduct prudent planning for, the provision of lethal aid and relevant operational training to vetted Syrian opposition forces, including an analysis of the risks of the provision of such aid and training; (11) should the President decide to employ any military assets in Syria, the President should provide a supplemental budget request to Congress; and (12) the President should use all diplomatic means to disrupt the flow of arms into Syria, including efforts to dissuade Russia from further arms sales with Syria, the influx of weapons and fighters from Hezbollah, and the infiltration of weapons and fighters from Iran. 1252. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations and related NATO agreements (a) Title 10, united states code Section 2350d of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking NATO Maintenance and Supply Organization each place it appears and inserting NATO Support Organization and its executive agencies; (2) in subsection (a)(1)— (A) by striking Weapon System Partnership Agreements and inserting Support Partnership Agreements; and (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking a specific weapon system and inserting activities; and (3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking Weapon System Partnership Agreement each place it appears and inserting Support Partnership Agreement. (b) Arms export control act Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended— (1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking Maintenance and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and inserting North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Support Organization and its executive agencies; (2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking weapon system partnership agreement and inserting support partnership agreement; and (3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking a specific weapon system and inserting activities. 1253. Limitation on funds to implement executive agreements relating to United States missile defense capabilities (a) Statement of policy Congress reaffirms, with respect to executive agreements relating to the missile defense capabilities of the United States, including basing, locations, capabilities and numbers of missiles with respect to such missile defense capabilities, that section 303(b) of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b)) provides the following: No action shall be taken pursuant to this or any other Act that would obligate the United States to reduce or limit the Armed Forces or armaments of the United States in a militarily significant manner, except pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President set forth in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution or unless authorized by the enactment of further affirmative legislation by the Congress of the United States.. (b) Limitation on funds None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be used— (1) to implement any executive agreement relating to the missile defense capabilities of the United States, including basing, locations, capabilities, and numbers of missiles with respect to such missile defense capabilities; or (2) to implement rules of engagement or Guidance for Employment of Force relating to such executive agreement. (c) Rule of construction Subsection (b) shall not apply with respect to the use of funds to negotiate or implement any executive agreement with a country with respect to which the United States has entered into a treaty of alliance or has a security guarantee. (d) Executive agreement defined In this section, the term executive agreement means an international agreement other than— (1) an agreement that is in the form of a treaty under article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States; or (2) an agreement that requires implementing legislation to be enacted into law for the agreement to enter into force with respect to the United States. 1254. Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (a) In general None of the funds made available for fiscal year 2014 for Threat Reduction Engagement activities may be obligated or expended for such purposes until the President certifies to Congress that no state party to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty has undertaken nuclear weapons test activities in fiscal year 2013 that are inconsistent with United States interpretations regarding obligations under such Treaty. (b) Lobbying or advocacy activities None of the funds made available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions of the United States to the CTBTO entities may be used for lobbying or advocacy in the United States relating to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. (c) CTBTO entities In subsection (b), the term CTBTO entities means— (1) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization International Monitoring System; and (2) the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions. 1255. Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the United States and Burma It is the sense of the Congress that— (1) as the United States policy rebalances towards Asia, it is critical that the United States military comprehensively evaluate its engagement with Burma; (2) the future of the military-to-military relationship between the United States and Burma should take into account the current ethnic conflict in Burma and persecution of ethnic and religious minorities; (3) while the United States has national security interests in Burma’s peace and stability, the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts with the ethnic minority groups requires the Burmese military to respect ceasefire agreements, laws of war, and human rights provisions; and (4) the Department of Defense should fully consider and assess the Burmese military’s efforts to implement reforms, end impunity for human rights abuses, and increase transparency and accountability before expanding military-to-military cooperation beyond initial dialogue and isolated engagements. 1256. Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) During the past several years, over 700 kinetic terror incidents have occurred in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area of operations. Rising tensions in the region due to unemployment, fiscal insolvency, ethnic strife, hegemonic desires, and terrorism, pose risks to the security and stability of Europe. (2) Arab Spring uprisings in Middle Eastern and North African countries, including the Republic of Mali, the Arab Republic of Egypt, Libya, and the Syrian Arab Republic (Syria), have presented emerging strategic challenges that present significant implications for regional stability, the security of the State of Israel (Israel), and the national security interests of the United States and many European allies. (3) U.S. Africa Command does not have formally assigned Army or Marine Corps units assigned to it and it continues to share Air Force and Navy component commands with EUCOM. Consequently, United States forces stationed in Europe have been deployed to support contingencies associated with the Arab Spring in North Africa. (4) The Commander of U.S. European Command is responsible for developing operational plans for the defense of Israel. Moreover, forces stationed in Europe would be deployed to defend Israel in the event of such a contingency. (5) Regimes, including the Islamic Republic of Iran and Syria, continue efforts to procure, develop, and proliferate advanced ballistic missile technologies that pose a serious threat to United States forces and installations in the theater, as well as to the territory, populations, and forces of Israel and European allies. United States missile defense capabilities in Europe seek to mitigate these threats. (6) Violent extremist organizations, including Kongra-Gel, al Qaida, Lebanese Hizballah, and Iranian Qods Force, may utilize Europe as an important venue for recruitment, logistical support, financing, and the targeting of the United States and Western interests. (7) Congress has lacked sufficient data to compare the strategic benefits and the costs associated with permanently stationing forces in Europe. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that the combatant commands do not completely and consistently report cost data in their theater posture plans. In particular, GAO reported in February 2011 that EUCOM lacks comprehensive cost data in its theater posture plans and therefore decision makers lack critical information that could be used to make fully informed posture decisions. Additionally, in June 2012, GAO found that the Department of Defense has taken steps to align posture initiatives with strategy and cost, but continues to lack comprehensive and consistent cost estimates of initiatives. (8) The Department of Defense has reported that the cost of permanently stationing forces in the United States rather than overseas is often offset by such factors as increased rotational costs. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) an enduring United States presence and engagement across Europe and Eurasia provides the critical access and infrastructure necessary to accomplish United States strategic priorities, expand United States global reach to Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa, as well as the Mediterranean and Atlantic Oceans, and facilitates a rapid United States response for complex contingencies; (2) the United States continues to have an interest in supporting the stability and security of Europe, especially in a dynamic and challenging global security environment; (3) forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-deployed rotational units, and reserve forces assigned to U.S. European Command remain essential for United States planning, logistics, and operations in support of U.S. Central Command, U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Transportation Command, U.S. Special Operations Command, and U.S. Strategic Command, as well as fulfilling commitments under Article V of the North Atlantic Charter; (4) in light of the benefits associated with defense of the homeland forward and strategic access, as well as the potential for rotational deployments to increase cost to the Department of Defense, the Department of Defense should implement the recommendations of the Government Accountability Office with regard to improved cost estimation to enable informed force posture decisions prior to making any further significant changes to the United States force posture in Europe that could increase risk for the United States; and (5) the Secretary of Defense should keep Congress fully and currently informed regarding the requirements of the United States force posture in Europe and the costs associated with maintaining such force. 1257. Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s Republic of China Congress— (1) notes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to rapidly modernize and expand its military capabilities across the land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace domains; (2) is concerned by the rate and scope of PRC military developments, including its military-focused cyber espionage, which indicate a desire to constrain or prevent the peaceful activities of the United States and its allies in the Western Pacific; (3) concurs with Admiral Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, that China’s rapid development of advanced military capabilities, combined with its unclear intentions, certainly raises strategic and security concerns for the U.S. and the region; (4) notes the United States remains committed to a robust forward military-presence in the Asia-Pacific and will continue to vigorously support mutual defense arrangements with treaty allies while also building deeper relationships with other strategic partners in the region; and (5) urges the Government of the PRC to work peacefully to resolve existing territorial disputes and to adopt a maritime code of conduct with relevant parties to guide all forms of maritime interaction and communications in the Asia-Pacific. 1258. Rule of construction Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Syria or Iran. 1259. Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan It is the sense of Congress that the United States should— (1) allow all high-level officials of Taiwan to enter into the United States or its embassies and consulates under conditions which demonstrate appropriate respect for the dignity of such leaders; (2) allow meetings between all high-level Taiwan and United States officials in United States executive departments; (3) allow the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office and all other instrumentalities established in the United States by Taiwan to conduct business activities, including activities which involve participation by Members of Congress and other representatives of Federal, State, and local governments, and all high-level Taiwan officials, without obstruction from the United States Government or any foreign power; and (4) adopt a policy of allowing high-ranking Taiwan leaders to make official visits with high-ranking officials of the United States, including official visits by Taiwan’s democratically elected president, and allowing for visits between these officials in Washington, D.C. 1260. Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Hezbollah has been designated a foreign terrorist organization by the Department of State since October 8, 1997. (2) Hezbollah has been responsible for numerous terrorist attacks and attempted terrorist attacks around the world, including attacks against United States citizens. (3) Hezbollah is active in Europe and has been linked to a July 18, 2012, suicide bombing in Bulgaria which killed five people. (4) Hezbollah operatives have been captured around the world attacking or attempting to attack Western and Israeli targets. (5) The United States is working with its European allies to combat terrorism through a variety of means, including through NATO’s Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism and the Defence Against Terrorism Programme of Work. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the United States should continue to use all necessary means to fight against terrorism, including Hezbollah; (2) President Obama should strongly encourage his European counterparts to publicly condemn Hezbollah; (3) European allies should seek to officially recognize Hezbollah as a terrorist organization; (4) any attempt to distinguish between military and civilian wings in Hezbollah is meaningless; and (5) all countries should work together to fight radical terrorist organizations like Hezbollah. 1261. Combating crime through intelligence capabilities The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy assets, personnel, and resources to the Joint Interagency Task Force South, in coordination with SOUTHCOM, to combat the following by supplying sufficient intelligence capabilities: (1) Transnational criminal organizations. (2) Drug trafficking. (3) Bulk shipments of narcotics or currency. (4) Narco-terrorism. (5) Human trafficking. (6) The Iranian presence in the Western Hemisphere. 1262. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has been signed by the President, received the advice and consent of the Senate, and has been the subject of implementing legislation by the Congress. 1263. War Powers of Congress (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In 1793, George Washington said, The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject and authorized such a measure.. (2) In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1798, James Madison wrote: The constitution supposes, what the History of all Governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to the Legislature. (3) In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution which states in section 2: The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.. (4) In its April 1, 2011, Memorandum to President Obama, the Office of Legal Counsel concluded: President Obama could rely on his constitutional power to safeguard the national interest by directing the anticipated military operations in Libya—which were limited in their nature, scope, and duration—without prior congressional authorization.. (5) On June 15, 2011, in a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives from the Department of Defense and Department of State, the Departments informed Congress that The President is of the view that the current U.S. military operations in Libya are consistent with the War Powers Resolution and do not under that law require further congressional authorization, because U.S. military operations are distinct from the kind of hostilities contemplated by the Resolution’s 60 day termination provision.. (6) The precedence set by the Executive Branch in its assertion that Congress plays no role in military actions like those taken in Libya is contrary to the intent of the Framers and of the Constitution which vests sole authority to declare war in the Legislative Branch. (b) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any use of military force. 1264. Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens (a) Prohibition The Department of Defense may not use a drone to kill a citizen of the United States. (b) Exception The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to an individual who is actively engaged in combat against the United States. (c) Definition In this section, the term drone means an unmanned aircraft (as defined in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)). 1265. Sale of F–16 aircraft to Taiwan The President shall carry out the sale of no fewer than 66 F–16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan. 1266. Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to self-defense (a) Findings Congress makes the following findings: (1) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel to self-defense. (2) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) expressed the sense of Congress that the Government of the United States should transfer to the Government of Israel defense articles and defense services such as air refueling tankers, missile defense capabilities, and specialized munitions. (3) The inherent right of Israel to self-defense necessarily includes the possession and maintenance by Israel of an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests. (b) Policy of the united states It is the policy of the United States to take all necessary steps to ensure that Israel possesses and maintains an independent capability to remove existential threats to its security and defend its vital national interests. (c) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that air refueling tankers and advanced bunker-buster munitions should immediately be transferred to Israel to ensure our democratic ally has an independent capability to remove any existential threat posed by the Iranian nuclear program and defend its vital national interests. (d) Report Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the House and Senate Armed Services committees, the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the House and Senate Appropriations committees a report that— (1) identifies all aerial refueling platforms, bunker-buster munitions, and other capabilities and platforms that would contribute significantly to the maintenance by Israel of a robust independent capability to remove existential security threats, including nuclear and ballistic missile facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests; (2) assesses the availability for sale or transfer of items necessary to acquire the capabilities and platforms described in paragraph (1) as well as the legal authorities available for making such transfers; and (3) describes the steps the President is taking to immediately transfer the items described in paragraph (1) pursuant to the policy described in subsection (b). 1267. Report on collective and national security implications of central Asian and South Caucasus energy development (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Assured access to stable energy supplies is an enduring concern of both the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). (2) Adopted in Lisbon in November 2010, the new NATO Strategic Concept declares that [s]ome NATO countries will become more dependent on foreign energy suppliers and in some cases, on foreign energy supply and distribution networks for their energy needs. (3) The report required by section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) reaffirmed the Strategic Concept’s assessment of growing energy dependence of some members of the NATO alliance and also noted there is value in the assured access, protection, and delivery of energy. (4) Development of energy resources and transit routes in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea can diversify sources of supply for members of the NATO alliance, particularly those in Eastern Europe. (b) Report (1) Report Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed report on the implications of new energy resource development and distribution networks, both planned and under construction, in the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea for energy security strategies of the United States and NATO. (2) Elements The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the dependence of NATO members on a single oil or natural gas supplier or distribution network. (B) An assessment of the potential of energy resources of the areas surrounding the Caspian Sea to mitigate such dependence on a single supplier or distribution network. (C) Recommendations, if any, for ways in which the United States can help support increased energy security for NATO members. (3) Submission of classified information The report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. (c) Appropriate congressional committees defined In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 1268. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation (a) Report Not later than June 1, 2014, and June 1 of each year thereafter through 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the current and future military power of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as Russia). The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development of Russian security strategy and military strategy, and military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-year period following submission of such report. (b) Matters to be included A report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) An assessment of the security situation in regions neighboring Russia. (2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy and military strategy. (3) Trends in Russian security and military behavior that would be designed to achieve, or that are consistent with, the goals described in paragraph (2). (4) An assessment of Russia’s global and regional security objectives, including objectives that would affect the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Middle East, and the People's Republic of China. (5) A detailed assessment of the sizes, locations, and capabilities of Russian nuclear, special operations, land, sea, and air forces. (6) Developments in Russian military doctrine and training. (7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems. (8) Developments in Russia’s asymmetric capabilities, including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy cyberwarfare and electronic warfare capabilities, details on the number of malicious cyber incidents originating from Russia against Department of Defense infrastructure, and associated activities originating or suspected of originating from Russia. (9) The strategy and capabilities of Russian space and counterspace programs, including trends, global and regional activities, the involvement of military and civilian organizations, including state-owned enterprises, academic institutions, and commercial entities, and efforts to develop, acquire, or gain access to advanced technologies that would enhance Russian military capabilities. (10) Developments in Russia's nuclear program, including the size and state of Russia's stockpile, its nuclear strategy and associated doctrines, its civil and military production capacities, and projections of its future arsenals. (11) A description of Russia's anti-access and area denial capabilities. (12) A description of Russia's command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance modernization program and its applications for Russia's precision guided weapons. (13) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters. (14) The current state of United States military-to-military contacts with the Russian Federation Armed Forces, which shall include the following: (A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such military-to-military contacts and updates to the strategy. (B) A summary of all such military-to-military contacts during the one-year period preceding the report, including a summary of topics discussed and questions asked by the Russian participants in those contacts. (C) A description of such military-to-military contacts scheduled for the 12-month period following such report and the plan for future contacts. (D) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Russians expect to gain from such military-to-military contacts. (E) The Secretary's assessment of the benefits the Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-military contacts, and any concerns regarding such contacts. (F) The Secretary's assessment of how such military-to-military contacts fit into the larger security relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation. (15) A description of Russian military-to-military relationships with other countries, including the size and activity of military attaché offices around the world and military education programs conducted in Russia for other countries or in other countries for the Russians. (16) Other military and security developments involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to United States national security. (c) Definition In this section the term specified congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. 1269. Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control items None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to provide tear gas or other riot control items to the government of a country undergoing a transition to democracy in the Middle East or North Africa unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives that the security forces of such government are not using excessive force to repress peaceful, lawful, and organized dissent. 1270. Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on measures to monitor and ensure that United States financial assistance to the Afghan National Security Forces to purchase fuel is not used to purchase fuel from Iran in violation of United States sanctions. 1271. Israel’s right to self-defense Congress fully supports Israel’s lawful exercise of self-defense, including actions to halt regional aggression. 1272. Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) On May 14, 1948, the people of Israel proclaimed the establishment of the sovereign and independent State of Israel. (2) On March 28, 1949, the United States Government recognized the establishment of the new State of Israel and established full diplomatic relations. (3) Since its establishment nearly 65 years ago, the modern State of Israel has rebuilt a nation, forged a new and dynamic democratic society, and created a thriving economic, political, cultural, and intellectual life despite the heavy costs of war, terrorism, and unjustified diplomatic and economic boycotts against the people of Israel. (4) The people of Israel have established a vibrant, pluralistic, democratic political system, including freedom of speech, association, and religion; a vigorously free press; free, fair, and open elections; the rule of law; a fully independent judiciary; and other democratic principles and practices. (5) Since the 1979 revolution in Iran, the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran have repeatedly made threats against the existence of the State of Israel and sponsored acts of terrorism and violence against its citizens. (6) On October 27, 2005, President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for a world without America and Zionism. (7) In February 2012, Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei said of Israel, The Zionist regime is a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off. And it definitely will be cut off.. (8) In August 2012, Supreme Leader Khamenei said of Israel, This bogus and fake Zionist outgrowth will disappear off the landscape of geography.. (9) In August 2012, President Ahmadinejad said that in the new Middle East * * * there will be no trace of the American presence and the Zionists; (10) The Department of State has designated the Islamic Republic of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and has characterized the Islamic Republic of Iran as the most active state sponsor of terrorism in the world. (11) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has provided weapons, training, funding, and direction to terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hizballah, and Shiite militias in Iraq that are responsible for the murder of hundreds of United States service members and innocent civilians. (12) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has provided weapons, training, and funding to the regime of Bashar al Assad that has been used to suppress and murder its own people. (13) Since at least the late 1980s, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has engaged in a sustained and well-documented pattern of illicit and deceptive activities to acquire a nuclear weapons capability. (14) Since September 2005, the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has found the Islamic Republic of Iran to be in non-compliance with its safeguards agreement with the IAEA, which Iran is obligated to undertake as a non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968, and entered into force March 5, 1970 (NPT). (15) The United Nations Security Council has adopted multiple resolutions since 2006 demanding of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran its full and sustained suspension of all uranium enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and its full cooperation with the IAEA on all outstanding issues related to its nuclear activities, particularly those concerning the possible military dimensions of its nuclear program. (16) The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran has refused to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions or to fully cooperate with the IAEA. (17) In November 2011, the IAEA Director General issued a report that documented serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme, and affirmed that information available to the IAEA indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device and that some activities may be ongoing. (18) The Government of Iran stands in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for denying its citizens basic freedoms, including the freedoms of expression, religion, peaceful assembly and movement, and for flagrantly abusing the rights of minorities and women. (19) In his State of the Union Address on January 24, 2012, President Barack Obama stated, Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal.. (20) Congress has passed and the President has signed into law legislation imposing significant economic and diplomatic sanctions on Iran to encourage the Government of Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons and end its support for terrorism. (21) These sanctions, while having significant effect, have yet to persuade Iran to abandon its illicit pursuits and comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions. (22) More stringent enforcement of sanctions legislation, including elements targeting oil exports and access to foreign exchange, could still lead the Government of Iran to change course. (23) In his State of the Union Address on February 12, 2013, President Obama reiterated, The leaders of Iran must recognize that now is the time for a diplomatic solution, because a coalition stands united in demanding that they meet their obligations. And we will do what is necessary to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon.. (24) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, Iran's leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of containment; I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.. (25) On October 22, 2012, President Obama said of Iran, The clock is ticking * * * And we're going to make sure that if they do not meet the demands of the international community, then we are going to take all options necessary to make sure they don't have a nuclear weapon.. (26) On May 19, 2011, President Obama stated, Every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat.. (27) On September 21, 2011, President Obama stated, America's commitment to Israel's security is unshakeable. Our friendship with Israel is deep and enduring.. (28) On March 4, 2012, President Obama stated, And whenever an effort is made to delegitimize the state of Israel, my administration has opposed them. So there should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel's back.. (29) On October 22, 2012, President Obama stated, Israel is a true friend. And if Israel is attacked, America will stand with Israel. I've made that clear throughout my presidency * * * I will stand with Israel if they are attacked.. (30) In December 2012, 74 United States Senators wrote to President Obama As you begin your second term as President, we ask you to reiterate your readiness to take military action against Iran if it continues its efforts to acquire a nuclear weapon. In addition, we urge you to work with our European and Middle Eastern allies to demonstrate to the Iranians that a credible and capable multilateral coalition exists that would support a military strike if, in the end, this is unfortunately necessary.. (31) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–150) stated that it is United States policy to support Israel’s inherent right to self-defense. (b) Sense of Congress Congress— (1) reaffirms the special bonds of friendship and cooperation that have existed between the United States and the State of Israel for more than sixty years and that enjoy overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and among the people of the United States; (2) strongly supports the close military, intelligence, and security cooperation that President Obama has pursued with Israel and urges this cooperation to continue and deepen; (3) deplores and condemns, in the strongest possible terms, the reprehensible statements and policies of the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran threatening the security and existence of Israel; (4) recognizes the tremendous threat posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by the Government of Iran’s continuing pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability; (5) reiterates that the policy of the United States is to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability and to take such action as may be necessary to implement this policy; (6) reaffirms its strong support for the full implementation of United States and international sanctions on Iran and urges the President to continue and strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation; (7) declares that the United States has a vital national interest in, and unbreakable commitment to, ensuring the existence, survival, and security of the State of Israel, and reaffirms United States support for Israel’s right to self-defense; and (8) urges that, if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in legitimate self-defense against Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the United States Government should stand with Israel and provide, in accordance with United States law and the constitutional responsibility of Congress to authorize the use of military force, diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence. (c) Rule of construction Nothing in this section shall be construed as an authorization for the use of force or a declaration of war. 1273. Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran and North Korea It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the paramount security concern of the United States is the ongoing and illegal nuclear weapons programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; (2) it should be the primary objective of the President of the United States to ensure that North Korea’s nuclear program is completely and verifiably eliminated and that Iran, and its terrorist proxies, are not allowed to develop nuclear weapons capability and the means to deliver them; (3) the continuing failure to compel Iran and North Korea to comply with their respective obligations under international law risks greater nuclear proliferation throughout already unstable regions by states that have chosen, but not irreversibly so, to refrain from developing or acquiring their own nuclear weapons capability; (4) nuclear arms reductions by the United States and the Russian Federation have not persuaded or otherwise incentivized Iran and North Korea to halt or reverse their destabilizing and dangerous nuclear weapons programs, nor have they resulted in increased cooperation by other states to deal with these threats; and (5) the President should use all international fora available to the President to pursue the complete and verifiable elimination of the nuclear weapons programs of Iran and North Korea as the President’s paramount obligation to the security of the American people. 1274. Limitation on use of funds to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport (a) Limitation No funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2013 may be used for the purchase of any equipment from Rosoboronexport until the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that, to the best of the Secretary's knowledge— (1) Rosoboronexport is cooperating fully with the Defense Contract Audit Agency; (2) Rosoboronexport has not delivered S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles to Syria; and (3) no new contracts have been signed between the Bashar al Assad regime in Syria and Rosoboronexport since January 1, 2013. (b) National security waiver (1) In general The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if the Secretary certifies that the waiver in order to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport is in national security interest of the United States. (2) Report If the Secretary waives the limitation in subsection (a) pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 30 days before purchasing equipment from Rosoboronexport pursuant to the waiver, a report on the waiver. The report shall be submitted in classified or unclassified form, at the election of the Secretary. The report shall include the following: (A) An explanation why it is in the national security interest of the United States to purchase equipment from Rosoboronexport. (B) An explanation why comparable equipment cannot be purchased from another corporation. (C) An assessment of the cooperation of Rosoboronexport with the Defense Contract Audit Agency. (D) An assessment of whether and how many S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles have been delivered to the Assad regime by Rosoboronexport. (E) A list of the contracts that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad regime since January 1, 2013. (c) Requirement for competitively bid contracts The Secretary of Defense shall award any contract that will use United States funds for the procurement of helicopters for the Afghan Security Forces using competitive procedures based on requirements developed by the Secretary of Defense. XIII Cooperative Threat Reduction 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds (a) Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). (b) Fiscal year 2014 cooperative threat reduction funds defined As used in this title, the term fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs. (c) Availability of funds Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2014, 2015, and 2016. 1302. Funding allocations (a) Funding for specific purposes Of the $528,455,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,655,000. (2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000. (3) For global nuclear security, $32,793,000. (4) For cooperative biological engagement, $293,142,110. (5) For proliferation prevention, $149,314,890. (6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000. (7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $28,175,000. (b) Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposes No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law. (c) Limited authority to vary individual amounts (1) In general Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for that purpose. (2) Notice-and-wait required An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after— (A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and (B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification. 1303. Extension for use of contributions to the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note) is amended by striking 2015 and inserting 2018. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region (a) Strategy required The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, shall establish a comprehensive and broad nonproliferation strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and advance cooperative efforts with international partners to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region. (b) Elements The strategy required by subsection (a) shall— (1) build upon the current activities of the Departments of Defense, State, and Energy’s nonproliferation programs that aim to mitigate the range of threats in the Middle East and North Africa region posed by weapons of mass destruction; (2) review issues relating to the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region on a regional basis as well as on a country-by-country basis; (3) review the activities and achievements in the Middle East and North Africa region of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program and the nonproliferation programs at the Department of State and Department of Energy and other United States Government agencies and departments designed to address nuclear, radiological, chemical, and biological safety and security issues; (4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative nonproliferation efforts within the United States Government and further mobilize and leverage additional resources from partner nations, nongovernmental and multilateral organizations, and international institutions; (5) include an assessment of what countries are financially, materially, or technologically supporting proliferation in this region and how the strategy will prevent, stop or interdict the support; (6) include an estimate of associated costs required to plan and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction activities in order to execute the comprehensive strategy to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials; and (7) include a discussion of the metrics to measure the strategy’s and activities’ success in reducing the regional threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. (c) Integration and coordination The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of gaps in current cooperative nonproliferation efforts, an articulation of agencies’ threat reduction priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region, the establishment of appropriate metrics for determining success in the region, and steps to ensure that the strategy fits in broader United States efforts to reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction. (d) Consultation In establishing the strategy required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may consult with both governmental and nongovernmental experts from a diverse set of views. (e) Strategy and implementation plan Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees the cooperative threat reduction modernization strategy required by subsection (a), as well as a plan for the implementation of the strategy required by subsection (a). (f) Form The strategy required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (g) Specified congressional committees In this section, the term specific congressional committees means— (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate. XIV Other Authorizations A Military Programs 1401. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1402. National defense sealift fund Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. (b) Use Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— (1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and (2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 1404. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1405. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 1406. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries. B National Defense Stockpile 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and critical materials supply (a) Presidential responsibility for conservation of stockpile materials Section 98e(a) of title 50, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): (5) provide for the recovery of any strategic and critical material from excess materials made available for recovery purposes by other Federal agencies; . (b) Uses of National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund Section 98h(b)(2) of title 50, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new subparagraph (D): (D) Encouraging the conservation of strategic and critical materials. . (c) Development of domestic sources Section 98h–6(a) of title 50, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting and conservation after development. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile (a) Acquisition authority Using funds available in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States: (1) Ferroniobium. (2) Dysprosium Metal. (3) Yttrium Oxide. (4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials. (5) Lithium Ion Precursors. (6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive Molding Powders. (b) Amount of authority The National Defense Stockpile Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified in subsection (a). (c) Fiscal year limitation The authority under this section is available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 2019. C Other Matters 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois (a) Authority for transfer of funds Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 507 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $143,087,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer. (b) Use of transferred funds For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500). 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 1423. Cemeterial expenses Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses, not otherwise provided for, in the amount of $45,800,000. XV Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations A Authorization of Additional Appropriations 1501. Purpose The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces. 1502. Procurement Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202. 1504. Operation and maintenance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 1505. Military personnel Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402. 1506. Working capital funds Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1508. Defense Inspector General Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 1509. Defense Health Program Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. B Financial Matters 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 1522. Special transfer authority (a) Authority To Transfer Authorizations (1) Authority Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. (2) Limitation The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $3,000,000,000. (b) Terms and Conditions Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. (c) Additional Authority The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001. C Limitations and Other Matters 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (a) Continuation of existing limitations on use of funds in Fund Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). (b) Revision of Plan for Use of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (1) Revision and Purpose The Secretary of Defense shall revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure that an office or official of the Department of Defense is identified as responsible for each program or activity supported using funds available to the Department of Defense through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. (2) Submission Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional committees the plan as revised pursuant to paragraph (1). (c) Promotion of recruitment and retention of women Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014, no less than $47,300,000 shall be used for the recruitment and retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces. This requirement does not modify the distribution of funds for programs and activities supported using the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, but will ensure attention to recruitment and retention of women within each program and activity. 1532. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (a) Report required Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the future plans of the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO). (b) Required elements The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) An analysis of alternatives considered in determining the future plans for JIEDDO. (2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue JIEDDO— (A) a description of how JIEDDO’s major programs and capabilities will be integrated into other components within the Department of Defense or discontinued; and (B) a statement of the estimated costs to other components of the Department for any JIEDDO programs and capabilities that are reassigned to such components. (3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO— (A) a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO; (B) a description of the expected organizational structure for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and lines of authority within the Department and personnel strength, including contractors; and (C) a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission of JIEDDO and its organizational structure. (4) A timeline for implementation of the selected alternative described in paragraph (2) or (3). (5) A description on how the Department will identify and incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing JIEDDO and its programs. 1533. Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in the funding table in section 4302, may be obligated or expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on Operation Observant Compass, including the specific goals of the campaign to counter the Lord Resistance Army, the precise metrics used to measure progress in such campaign, and the required steps that will be taken to transition such campaign if it is determined that it is no longer necessary for the United States to support the mission of such campaign. 1534. Report on United States force levels and costs of military operations in Afghanistan Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and Senate a report on the following: (1) The estimated United States force levels in Afghanistan for each of years 2015 through 2020. (2) The estimated costs of United States military operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020. 1535. Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment (a) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF), $2,600,000,000 shall be withheld from obligation and expenditure until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report as described in subsection (b). (b) Report The report referred to in subsection (a) is a report that includes the following information: (1) A list of all covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment to be purchased with funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act to the Department of Defense for the ASFF. (2) The expected date on which such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment would be delivered and operable in Afghanistan. (3) The full requirements for operating such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment. (4) The plan for maintenance of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment and estimated costs of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment by year, through 2020. (5) The expected date that ASFF personnel would be fully capable of operating and maintaining such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment without support from United States personnel. (6) An explanation of the extent to which the acquisition of such covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment will impact the longer-term United States costs of supporting the ASFF. (c) Covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment In this section, the term covered aircraft, vehicles, and equipment means helicopters, systems for close air support, air mobility systems, and armored vehicles. XVI Industrial Base Matters 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense (a) Requirement for periodic audits of contracting compliance The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct periodic audits of contracting practices and policies related to procurement under section 2533a of title 10, United States Code. Such an audit shall be conducted at least once every three years. (b) Requirement for additional information in semiannual reports The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall ensure that findings and other information resulting from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included in the semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees under section 8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). 1602. Expansion of the procurement technical assistance program to advance small business growth (a) Advancing small business growth (1) In general Chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and (B) by inserting after section 2418 the following new section 2419: 2419. Advancing small business growth (a) Identification of recommended business capabilities and characteristics (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall publish in the Federal Register and on the website of the Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of Defense a list of capabilities and characteristics recommended for the successful transition of a qualified small business concern to become competitive as an other-than-small business for contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. The capabilities and characteristics on the list shall be set forth by North American Industry Classification System sector. (2) The list shall be reviewed and updated appropriately on an annual basis. (b) Contract clause required (1) The Under Secretary shall require the clause described in paragraph (2) to be included in each covered contract awarded by the Department of Defense. (2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— (A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that acceptance of the contract may cause the business to exceed the applicable small business size standards (established pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the industry concerned and that the contractor may no longer qualify as a small business concern for that industry; and (B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and characteristics identified in the list required by subsection (a) if the contractor intends to remain competitive as an other-than-small business in that industry. (c) Assistance for advancing certain small businesses Eligible small businesses may be provided specific assistance with developing the capabilities and characteristics identified in the list required by subsection (a), as part of any procurement technical assistance furnished pursuant to this chapter. (d) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered contract means a contract— (A) awarded to a qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act; and (B) with an estimated annual value— (i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based small business size standard; or (ii) if the contract is in an industry with an employee-based size standard, that will exceed $70,000,000. (2) The term eligible small business means a qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract with the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause described in subsection (b)(2). . (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections as the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 2419 and inserting the following: 2419. Advancing small business growth. 2420. Regulations. . (b) Exception to limitation on funding Section 2414 of such title is amended— (1) in subsection (a), by striking The value and inserting Except as provided in subsection (c), the value; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection (c): (c) Exception The value of the assistance provided in accordance with section 2419(c) of this title is not subject to the limitations in subsection (a). . (c) Revisions to cooperative agreements (1) Full funding allowed for certain assistance Section 2413(b) of such title is amended— (A) by striking except that in the case and inserting: except that— (1) in the case ; (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and (C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity that provides specific assistance for eligible small businesses pursuant to section 2419(c) of this title, the Secretary may agree to furnish the full cost of such assistance. . (2) Additional considerations Section 2413 of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (e) In determining the level of funding to provide under an agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consider the forecast by the eligible entity of demand for procurement technical assistance, and, in the case of an established program under this chapter, the outlays and receipts of such program during prior years of operation. . (3) Conforming amendment Section 2413(d) of such title is amended by striking and in determining the level of funding to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),. (d) Report required Not later than March 15 of 2015, 2016, and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the amendments made by this section, along with any recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. 1603. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (a) Increase in Government share Section 2413(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking one-half both places it appears and inserting 65 percent; and (2) by striking three-fourths and inserting 75 percent. (b) Increase in limitations on value of assistance Section 2414(a) of such title is amended— (1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking $600,000 and inserting $750,000; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking $300,000 and inserting $450,000; and (3) in paragraph (3), by striking $150,000 and inserting $300,000. 1604. Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat (a) Limitation; strategic plan The Administrator of the Defense Logistics Agency may not make any reductions in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat until the Administrator and the heads of the military services, in consultation with manufacturers of meals ready-to-eat, develop a comprehensive strategic plan to address— (1) the aggregate meals ready-to-eat requirements for each of the military departments; (2) industrial base sustainment and war-time surge capacity requirements for meals ready-to-eat; and (3) timely rotation of the war reserves of meals-ready-to-eat. (b) Briefing required The Administrator shall brief the congressional defense committees on the strategic plan developed under subsection (a) before making any reductions in the requirements for war reserve stocks of meals ready-to-eat. 1605. Foreign commercial satellite services (a) In general Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 911(b) of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section: 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services (a) Prohibition The Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for satellite services with a foreign entity if— (1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the government of a covered foreign country has an ownership interest; or (2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide launch or other satellite services under the contract from a covered foreign country. (b) Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) for a particular contract if the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, submits to the congressional defense committees a national security assessment for such contract that includes the following: (1) The projected period of performance (including any period covered by options to extend the contract), the financial terms, and a description of the services to be provided under the contract. (2) To the extent practicable, a description of the ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in the foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department of Defense under the contract and the launch or other satellite services that will be provided in a covered foreign country under the contract. (3) A justification for entering into a contract with such foreign entity and a description of the actions necessary to eliminate the need to enter into such a contract with such foreign entity in the future. (4) A risk assessment of entering into a contract with such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission assurance and security of information and a description of any measures necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk assessment. (c) Delegation of waiver authority The Secretary of Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b) to waive subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and such authority may not be further delegated. (d) Form of waiver assessments Each assessment under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (e) Covered foreign country defined In this section, the term covered foreign country means a country described in section 1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2019). . (b) Table of sections amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(c) of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following item: 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services. . 1606. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (a) Pilot Program The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall establish and implement a pilot program, to be known as the Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program, in accordance with this section. (b) Purpose The purpose of the pilot program is to accelerate the commercialization of basic research innovations from qualifying institutions. (c) Awards (1) In general Under the pilot program, the Secretary shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in accordance with this subsection. (2) Competitive, merit-based process An award under the pilot program shall be made using a competitive, merit-based process. (3) Eligibility A qualifying institution shall be eligible for an award under the pilot program if the institution agrees to— (A) use funds from the award for the uses specified in paragraph (5); and (B) oversee the use of the funds through— (i) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of experts in translational and proof of concept research, including industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, and business experts and university technology transfer officials; (ii) technology validation milestones focused on market feasibility; (iii) simple reporting on program progress; and (iv) a process to reallocate funding from poor performing projects to those with more potential. (4) Criteria An award may be made under the pilot program to a qualifying institution in accordance with the following criteria: (A) The extent to which a qualifying institution— (i) has an established and proven technology transfer or commercialization office and has a plan for engaging that office in the program’s implementation or has outlined an innovative approach to technology transfer that has the potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer outcomes and can be adopted by other qualifying institutions; (ii) can assemble a project management board comprised of industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, financial, and business experts; (iii) has an intellectual property rights strategy or office; and (iv) demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond the duration of the funding from the award. (B) Such other criteria as the Secretary determines necessary. (5) Use of award (A) In general Subject to subparagraph (B), the funds from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial potential of existing discoveries, including activities that contribute to determining a project’s commercialization path, including technical validations, market research, clarifying intellectual property rights, and investigating commercial and business opportunities. (B) Limitations (i) The amount of an award may not exceed $500,000 a year. (ii) Funds from an award may not be used for basic research, or to fund the acquisition of research equipment or supplies unrelated to commercialization activities. (d) Report Not later than one year after the establishment of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees and to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. The report shall include— (1) a detailed description of the pilot program, including incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts; (2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program; (3) a detailed description of the institutional selection process; (4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot program; and (5) an analysis of the program’s effectiveness, with data supporting the analysis. (e) Qualifying institution defined In this section, the term qualifying institution means a nonprofit institution, as defined in section 4(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)), or a Federal laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(4)). (f) Termination The pilot program conducted under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018. 1607. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns Subsection (h) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended to read as follows: (h) Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns (1) Agency reports At the conclusion of each fiscal year, the head of each Federal agency shall submit to the Administrator a report describing— (A) the extent of the participation by small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans (including service-disabled veterans), qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women in the procurement contracts of such agency during such fiscal year; (B) whether the agency achieved the goals established for the agency under subsection (g)(2) with respect to such fiscal year; (C) any justifications for a failure to achieve such goals; and (D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices to better meet such goals, including analysis of factors leading to any failure to achieve such goals. (2) Reports by administrator Not later than 60 days after receiving a report from each Federal agency under paragraph (1) with respect to a fiscal year, the Administrator shall submit to the President and Congress, and to make available on a public Web site, an annual report that includes— (A) a copy of each report submitted to the Administrator under paragraph (1); (B) a determination of whether each goal established by the President under subsection (g)(1) for such fiscal year was achieved; (C) a determination of whether each goal established by the head of a Federal agency under subsection (g)(2) for such fiscal year was achieved; (D) the reasons for any failure to achieve a goal established under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (g) for such fiscal year and a description of actions planned by the applicable agency to address such failure, including the Administrator’s comments and recommendations on the proposed remediation plan; and (E) for the Federal Government and each Federal agency, an analysis of the number and dollar amount of prime contracts awarded during such fiscal year to— (i) small business concerns— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; and (IV) through unrestricted competition; (ii) small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans; and (V) through unrestricted competition; (iii) qualified HUBZone small business concerns— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to qualified HUBZone small business concerns; (V) through unrestricted competition where a price evaluation preference was used; and (VI) through unrestricted competition where a price evaluation preference was not used; (iv) small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; (V) through unrestricted competition; and (VI) by reason of that concern’s certification as a small business owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; (v) small business concerns owned by an Indian tribe (as such term is defined in section 8(a)(13)) other than an Alaska Native Corporation— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and (V) through unrestricted competition; (vi) small business concerns owned by a Native Hawaiian Organization— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and (V) through unrestricted competition; (vii) small business concerns owned by an Alaska Native Corporation— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through sole source contracts; (III) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (IV) through competitions restricted to small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals; and (V) through unrestricted competition; and (viii) small business concerns owned and controlled by women— (I) in the aggregate; (II) through competitions restricted to small business concerns; (III) through competitions restricted using the authority under section 8(m)(2); (IV) through competitions restricted using the authority under section 8(m)(2) and in which the waiver authority under section 8(m)(3) was used; and (V) through unrestricted competition; and (F) for the Federal Government, the number, dollar amount, and distribution with respect to the North American Industry Classification System of subcontracts awarded during such fiscal year to small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by women, provided that such information is publicly available through data systems developed pursuant to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–282), or otherwise available as provided in paragraph (3). (3) Access to data (A) Federal procurement data system To assist in the implementation of this section, the Administration shall have access to information collected through the Federal Procurement Data System, Federal Subcontracting Reporting System, or any new or successor system. (B) Agency procurement data sources To assist in the implementation of this section, the head of each contracting agency shall provide, upon request of the Administration, procurement information collected through agency data collection sources in existence at the time of the request. Contracting agencies shall not be required to establish new data collection systems to provide such data. . 1608. Program to provide Federal contracts to early stage small businesses (a) In general The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 48. Program to provide Federal contracts to early stage small businesses (a) Establishment The Administrator shall establish and carry out a program in accordance with the requirements of this section to provide improved access to Federal contract opportunities for early stage small business concerns. (b) Procurement contracts (1) In general In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall identify procurement contracts of Federal agencies for award under the program. (2) Contract awards Under the program established pursuant to this section, the award of a procurement contract of a Federal agency identified by the Administrator pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be made by the agency to an eligible program participant selected, and determined to be responsible, by the agency. (3) Competition (A) Sole source A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this program if such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of such contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more early stage small business concerns will submit offers for the contracting opportunity and in the estimation of the contracting officer, the contract award can be made at a fair and reasonable price. (B) restricted competition A contracting officer may award contracts on the basis of competition restricted to early stage small business concerns if the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that not less than 2 early stage small business concerns will submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair market price. (4) Contract value Contracts shall be awarded under this program if its value is greater than $3,000 and less than half the upper threshold of section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act. (c) Eligibility Only an early stage small business concern shall be eligible to compete for a contract to be awarded under the program. The Administrator shall certify that a small business concern is an early stage small business concern, or the Administrator shall approve a Federal agency, a State government, or a national certifying entity to certify that the business meets the eligibility criteria of an early stage small business concern. (d) Technical assistance The Administrator shall provide early stage small business concerns with technical assistance and counseling with regard to— (1) applying for and competing for Federal contracts; and (2) fulfilling the administrative responsibilities associated with the performance of a Federal contract. (e) Attainment of contract goals All contract awards made under the program shall be counted toward the attainment of the goals specified in section 15(g) of the Small Business Act. (f) Regulations The Administrator shall— (1) issue proposed regulations to carry out this section not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act; and (2) issue final regulations to carry out this section not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act. (g) Report to congress Not later than April 30, 2015, the Administrator shall transmit to the Congress a report on the performance of the program. (h) Definitions For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) Program The term program means a program established pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Early stage small business concern The term early stage small business concern means a small business concern that— (A) has not more than 15 employees; and (B) has average annual receipts that total not more than $1,000,000, except if the concern is in an industry with an average annual revenue standard that is less than $1,000,000, as defined by the North American Industry Classification System. . (b) Repeal of similar program Section 304 of the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 1994 (15 U.S.C. 644 note) is repealed. 1609. Credit for certain subcontractors (a) In general Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following: (16) Credit for certain subcontractor For purposes of determining whether or not a prime contractor has attained the percentage goals specified in paragraph (6)— (A) if the subcontracting goals pertain only to a single contract with the executive agency, the prime contractor shall receive credit for small business concerns performing as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors at any tier pursuant to the subcontracting plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an amount equal to the dollar value of work awarded to such small business concerns; and (B) if the subcontracting goals pertain to more than one contract with one or more executive agencies, or to one contract with more than one executive agency, the prime contractor may only count first tier subcontractors that are small business concerns. . (b) Definitions pertaining to subcontracting Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at the end the following: (dd) Definitions pertaining to subcontracting In this Act: (1) Subcontract The term subcontract means a legally binding agreement between a contractor that is already under contract to another party to perform work, and a third party, hereinafter referred to as the subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part, or all, of the work that the contractor has undertaken. (2) First tier subcontractor The term first tier subcontractor means a subcontractor who has a subcontract directly with the prime contractor. (3) At any tier The term at any tier means any subcontractor other than a subcontractor who is a first tier subcontractor. . 1610. GAO Study on subcontracting reporting systems Not later than 365 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report studying the feasibility of using Federal subcontracting reporting systems, including the Federal subaward reporting system required by section 2 of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 and any electronic subcontracting reporting award system used by the Small Business Administration, to attribute subcontractors to particular contracts in the case of contractors that have subcontracting plans under section 8(d) of the Small Business Act that pertain to multiple contracts with executive agencies. 1611. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts In the case of a contract to which the provisions of section 46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s) apply, the requirements under section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 do not apply. B Military Construction Authorizations 2001. Short title This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law (a) Expiration of authorizations after three years Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX of this division for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of— (1) October 1, 2016; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017. (b) Exception Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of— (1) October 1, 2016; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 2003. Effective date Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of— (1) October 1, 2013; or (2) the date of the enactment of this Act. XXI Army Military Construction 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount AlaskaFort Wainwright$103,000,000 ColoradoFort Carson, Colorado$242,200,000 FloridaEglin AFB$4,700,000 GeorgiaFort Gordon$61,000,000 HawaiiFort Shafter$65,000,000 KansasFort Leavenworth$17,000,000 KentuckyFort Campbell, Kentucky$4,800,000 MarylandAberdeen Proving Ground$21,000,000 Fort Detrick$7,100,000 MissouriFort Leonard Wood$90,700,000 North CarolinaFort Bragg$5,900,000 TexasFort Bliss$46,800,000 VirginiaJoint Base Langley-Eustis$50,000,000 WashingtonJoint Base Lewis-Mcchord$144,000,000  Yakima $9,100,00 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount Marshall IslandsKwajalein Atoll$63,000,000 (c) Unspecified worldwide Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military construction projects at unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set forth in the following table: Army: Unspecified Location Location or InstallationAmount Worldwide UnspecifiedUnspecified Worldwide Locations$33,000,000 2102. Family housing (a) Construction and acquisition Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: Army: Family Housing CountryInstallationUnitsAmount GermanySouth Camp Vilseck29$16,600,000 WisconsinFort McCoy56$23,000,000 (b) Planning and design Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,408,000. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2104. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project (a) Project authorization In connection with the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of a Research and Development Loading Facility, the Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project in the amount of $4,500,000 to complete work on the facility within the initial scope of the project. (b) Use of unobligated prior-year army military construction funds For the project described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall use unobligated Army military construction funds that were appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2014 and are available because of savings resulting from favorable bids. (c) Congressional notification The Secretary of the Army shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of APS Warehouses, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 74,976 square meters of hardstand parking, 22,741 square meters of access roads, a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 square meters of humidity-controlled warehouses. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington, for construction of a Regional Logistics Support Complex, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 98,381 square yards of Organizational Vehicle Parking. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects (a) Extensions Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2628) and extended by section 2106 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later: (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount VirginiaFort BelvoirRoad and Access Control Point$9,500,000 WashingtonFort LewisFort Lewis-McChord AFB Joint Access$9,000,000 KuwaitCamp ArifjianAPS Warehouses$82,000,000 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (a) Extensions Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later: (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount CaliforniaPresidio of MontereyAdvanced Individual Training Barracks $63,000,000 GeorgiaFort BenningLand Acquisition$12,200,000 New MexicoWhite Sands Missile RangeBarracks$29,000,000 GermanyWiesbaden Air BaseAccess Control Point$5,100,000 2109. Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill, Dahlonega, Georgia (a) Transfer Required Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for required Army force protection measures certain Federal land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest, but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately 282.304 acres identified in the permit numbered 0018–01. (b) Use of Transferred Land Upon receipt of the land under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall continue to use the land for military purposes. (c) Protection of the Etowah Darter and Holiday Darter Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a) shall affect the prior designation of lands within the Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter (Etheostoma brevirostrum). (d) Legal Description and Map (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of the land to be transferred under subsection (a) not later than 180 days of this Act’s enactment. (2) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of Agriculture may correct errors in the legal description and map. (e) Reimbursements of Costs The transfer required by subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of Agriculture for any costs incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture to prepare the legal description and map under subsection (c). XXII Navy Military Construction 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount CaliforniaBarstow$14,998,000 Camp Pendleton, California$13,124,000 Coronado$8,910,000 Point Mugu $24,667,000 Port Hueneme $33,600,000 San Diego$34,331,000 Twentynine Palms, California$33,437,000 FloridaJacksonville$20,752,000 Key West$14,001,000 Mayport$16,093,000 GeorgiaAlbany$16,610,000 Savannah$61,717,000 GuamJoint Region Marianas$318,377,000 HawaiiKaneohe Bay$236,982,000 Pearl City$30,100,000 Pearl Harbor$57,998,000 IllinoisGreat Lakes$35,851,000 MarylandFort Meade$83,988,000 MaineBangor$13,800,000 Kittery$11,522,000 North CarolinaCamp Lejeune, North Carolina$77,999,000 New River$45,863,000 NevadaFallon$11,334,000 OklahomaTinker Air Force Base$14,144,000 Rhode IslandNewport$12,422,000 South CarolinaCharleston$73,932,000 VirginiaDam Neck$10,587,000 Norfolk$3,380,000 Quantico$38,374,000 Yorktown$18,700,000 WashingtonBremerton$18,189,000 Whidbey Island$117,649,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount DjiboutiCamp Lemonier$29,000,000 JapanCamp Butler$5,820,000 JapanYokosuka$7,568,000 2202. Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,438,000. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $68,969,000. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2205. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project The Secretary of the Navy may not obligate or expend any funds authorized in this title for land acquisition related to the Townsend Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until the Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has entered into mutually-acceptable agreements with the governments of Long and McIntosh Counties, Georgia, that— (1) include specific arrangements to mitigate any economic hardships to be incurred by the counties as a result of revenue loss caused by the acquisition; or (2) affirm that no compensation is required from the Secretary before the acquisition proceeds. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4441) for Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction of Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary of the Navy may construct additional Type C earth covered magazines (to provide a project total of eighteen), ten new modular storage magazines, an inert storage facility, a maintenance and ground support equipment facility, concrete pads for portable ready service lockers, and associated supporting facilities using appropriations available for the project. 2207. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for Kitsap, Washington, for construction of Explosives Handling Wharf No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy may construct new hardened facilities in lieu of hardening existing structures and a new facility to replace the existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection Unit and the Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facilities using appropriations available for the project. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations State/CountryInstallation or LocationProjectAmount BahrainSouthwest AsiaNavy Central Command Ammunition Magazines$89,280,000 GuamNaval ActivitiesDefense Access Roads Improvements$66,730,000 XXIII Air Force Military Construction 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount ArizonaLuke Air Force Base$26,900,000 CaliforniaBeale Air Force Base$62,000,000 FloridaTyndall Air Force Base$9,100,000 GuamJoint Region Marianas$176,230,000 HawaiiJoint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam$4,800,000 KansasMcConnell Air Force Base$219,120,000 KentuckyFort Campbell, Kentucky$8,000,000 Mariana IslandsSaipan$29,300,000 MarylandFort Meade$358,000,000 Joint Base Andrews$30,000,000 MissouriWhiteman Air Force Base$5,900,000 North DakotaMinot Air Force Base$23,830,000 New MexicoCannon Air Force Base$34,100,000 Holloman Air Force Base$2,250,000 Kirtland Air Force Base$30,500,000 NevadaNellis Air Force Base$78,500,000 OklahomaAltus Air Force Base$30,850,000 Tinker Air Force Base$8,600,000 TexasFort Bliss$3,350,000 UtahHill Air Force Base$32,000,000 VirginiaJoint Base Langley-Eustis$4,800,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force: Outside the United States CountryInstallationAmount GreenlandThule AB$43,904,000 United KingdomRAF Lakenheath$22,047,000 2302. Family housing Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,267,000. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $72,093,000. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, for construction of a hangar by striking $58,000,000 in the amount column and inserting $128,000,000. 2306. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project The Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate or expend any funds authorized in this title for the construction of a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport storage facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies to Congress that the Secretary will purchase an interest in the real estate associated with these military construction projects. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount BahrainSouthwest AsiaNorth Apron Expansion$45,000,000 XXIV Defense Agencies Military Construction A Defense Agency Authorizations 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount AlaskaClear Air Force Base$17,204,000 Fort Greely$82,000,000 CaliforniaBrawley $23,095,000 Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy$37,554,000 Miramar$6,000,000 ColoradoFort Carson, Colorado$22,282,000 FloridaHurlburt Field$7,900,000 Jacksonville$7,500,000 Panama City$2,600,000 Tyndall Air Force Base$9,500,000 GeorgiaFort Benning$43,335,000 Fort Stewart, Georgia$44,504,000 Hunter Army Airfield$13,500,000 Moody Air Force Base$3,800,000 HawaiiFord Island$2,615,000 Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam$2,800,000 KentuckyFort Campbell, Kentucky$124,211,000 Fort Knox$303,023,000 MassachusettsHanscom Air Force Base$36,213,000 MarylandAberdeen Proving Ground$210,000,000 Bethesda Naval Hospital$66,800,000 North CarolinaCamp Lejeune$28,977,000 Fort Bragg$172,065,000 North DakotaMinot Air Force Base$6,400,000 New JerseyJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst$10,000,000 New MexicoHolloman Air Force Base$81,400,000 OklahomaAltus Air Force Base$2,100,000 Tinker Air Force Base$36,000,000 PennsylvaniaDefense Distribution Depot New Cumberland$9,000,000 South CarolinaBeaufort$41,324,000 TennesseeArnold Air Force Base$2,200,000 TexasJoint Base San Antonio$12,600,000 VirginiaDefense Distribution Depot Richmond$87,000,000 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Story$30,404,000 Pentagon$59,450,000 Quantico$40,586,000 WashingtonWhidbey Island$10,000,000 (b) Outside the United States Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount Bahrain IslandSouthwest Asia$45,400,000 BelgiumBrussels$67,613,000 GermanyKaiserlautern Air Base$49,907,000 Ramstein Air Base$98,762,000 Weisbaden$109,655,000 JapanAtsugi$4,100,000 Iwakuni$34,000,000 Kadena Air Base$38,792,000 Torri Commo Station$63,621,000 Yokosuka$10,600,000 Korea, Republic OfCamp Walker$52,164,000 United KingdomRaf Mildenhall$84,629,000 Royal Air Force Lakenheath$69,638,000 (c) Unspecified classified Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for military construction projects at unspecified worldwide locations as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for unspecified installations or locations in the amounts set forth in the following table: Defense Agencies: Classified Location Location or InstallationAmount Worldwide ClassifiedClassified Worldwide Locations$15,000,000 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects (a) Inside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States StateInstallation or LocationAmount AlabamaAnniston Army Depot$2,700,000 CaliforniaMCAS Miramar$17,968,000 Parks DRTA$4,150,000 FloridaNAS Jacksonville$2,840,000 HawaiiCamp Smith$7,966,000 Hickam$3,100,000 Hickam$3,000,000 IndianaMt. Home$2,630,000 KansasTokepka Readiness Center$2,050,000 MassachusettsDevens$2,600,000 New YorkUS Military Academy$3,200,000 South CarolinaShaw$2,500,000 TexasNAS Corpus Christi$2,340,000 Sheppard$3,779,000 Laughlin$2,800,000 UtahDugway Proving Ground$9,966,000 Tooele Army Depot$5,900,000 Tooele Army Depot$5,500,000 Tooele Army Depot$4,300,000 VirginiaNSA Hampton Roads$4,060,000 Pentagon$2,120,000 Various LocationsVarious Locations$20,476,000 (b) Outside the united states Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States CountryInstallation or LocationAmount ItalyNAS Sigonella$3,300,000 JapanCFA Sasebo$14,766,000 JapanYokota$5,674,000 GermanyRamstein$2,140,000 GreenlandThule$5,175,000 Various LocationsVarious Locations$3,000,000 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXV North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601. XXVI Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities A Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army National Guard: Inside the United States StateLocationAmount AlabamaDecatur$4,000,000 ArkansasFort Chaffee$21,000,000 FloridaPinellas Park$5,700,000 IllinoisKankakee$42,000,000 MassachusettsCamp Edwards$19,000,000 MichiganCamp Grayling$17,000,000 MinnesotaStillwater$17,000,000 MissouriMacon$9,100,000 Whiteman AFB$5,000,000 MississippiCamp Shelby$3,000,000 Pascagoula$4,500,000 New YorkNew York$31,000,000 OhioRavenna Army Ammunition Plant$5,200,000 PennsylvaniaFort Indiantown Gap$40,000,000 Puerto RicoCamp Santiago$5,600,000 South CarolinaGreenville$26,000,000 TexasFort Worth$14,270,000 WyomingAfton$10,200,000 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Army Reserve StateLocationAmount CaliforniaCamp Parks$17,500,000 Fort Hunter Liggett$16,500,000 MarylandBowie$25,500,000 North CarolinaFort Bragg$24,500,000 New JerseyJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-Lakehurst$36,200,000 New YorkBullville$14,500,000 WisconsinFort Mccoy$23,400,000 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve StateLocationAmount CaliforniaMarch Air Force Base$11,086,000 MissouriKansas City$15,020,000 TennesseeMemphis$4,330,000 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air National Guard StateLocationAmount AlabamaBirmingham International Airport$8,500,000 IndianaHulman Regional Airport$7,300,000 MontanaGreat Falls International Airport$22,000,000 New YorkFort Drum, New York$4,700,000 OhioSpringfield Beckley-Map$7,200,000 PennsylvaniaFort Indiantown Gap$7,700,000 Rhode IslandQuonset State Airport$6,000,000 TennesseeMcghee-Tyson Airport$18,000,000 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: Air Force Reserve StateLocationAmount CaliforniaMarch Air Force Base$19,900,000 FloridaHomestead Air Reserve Base$9,800,000 OklahomaTinker Air Force Base$12,200,000 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Other Matters 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Fort Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a Joint Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may, instead of constructing a new facility at Camp Dodge, acquire up to approximately 20 acres to construct a Joint Reserve Center and associated supporting facilities in the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using amounts appropriated for the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136). 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (a) Extension Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2604 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. (b) Table The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations StateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount Puerto RiceCamp SantiagoMulti Purpose Machine Gun Range$9,200,000 TennesseeNashville International AirportIntelligence Group and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Remote Split Operations Group$5,500,000 VirginiaFort StoryArmy Reserve Center$11,000,000 XXVII Base Realignment and Closure Activities A Authorization of Appropriations 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. B Other Matters 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round, and none of the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations contained in this Act may be used to propose, plan for, or execute an additional BRAC round. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability of military health care in National Capital Region Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking on a quarterly basis. 2713. Consideration of the value of services provided by a local community to the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis in making base realignment or closure decisions As part of the economic analysis conducted in making any base realignment or closure decision under section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, or other base realignment or closure authority, or in making any decision under section 993 of such title to reduce the number of members of the armed forces assigned at a military installation, the Secretary of Defense shall include an accounting of the value of services, such as schools, libraries, and utilities, as well as land, structures, and access to infrastructure, such as airports and seaports, that are provided by the local community to the military installation and that result in cost savings for the Armed Forces. XXVIII Military Construction General Provisions A Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 2801. Modification of authority to carry out unspecified minor military construction (a) Increased threshold for application of Secretory approval and congressional notification requirements Subsection (b)(1) of section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking $750,000 and inserting $1,000,000. (b) Increase in maximum amount of operation and maintenance funds authorized to be used for certain projects Subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section is amended by striking $750,000 and inserting $1,000,000. (c) Annual location adjustment of dollar limitations Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (f) Adjustment of dollar limitations for location Each fiscal year, the Secretary concerned shall adjust the dollar limitations specified in this section applicable to an unspecified minor military construction project to reflect the area construction cost index for military construction projects published by the Department of Defense during the prior fiscal year for the location of the project. . (d) Modification and extension of authority for laboratory revitalization projects (1) In general Subsection (d) of section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking not more than $2,000,000 and inserting not more than $4,000,000, notwithstanding subsection (c); (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: For purposes of this subsection, an unspecified minor military construction project is a military construction project that (notwithstanding subsection (a)) has an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000.; and (C) in paragraph (5), by striking 2016 and inserting 2020. (2) Application to current projects The amendments made by paragraph (1) do not apply to any laboratory revitalization project for which the design phase has been completed as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 2802. Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns and floor areas for military family housing and submission of net floor area information (a) Repeal Section 2826 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2826. 2803. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing (a) Repeal (1) In general Section 2837 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed. (2) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2837. (b) Effect on existing contracts The repeal of section 2837 of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the validity or terms of any contract in connection with a limited partnership under subsection (a) or a collateral incentive agreement under subsection (b) of such section entered into before the date of the enactment of this Act. (c) Effect on defense housing investment account Any unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing Investment Account on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be transferred to the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund. Amounts transferred shall be merged with amounts in such fund and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund. 2804. Military construction standards to reduce vulnerability of structures to terrorist attack Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking develop construction standards designed and inserting develop construction standards that, taking into consideration the probability of a terrorist attack, are designed. 2805. Treatment of payments received for providing utilities and services in connection with use of alternative authority for acquisition and improvement of military housing (a) Crediting of payments Section 2872a(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking from which the cost of furnishing the utilities or services concerned was paid and inserting available to the Secretary concerned to furnish utilities or services under subsection (a). (b) Application of amendment The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to cash payments received under subsection (c)(1) of section 2872a of title 10, United States Code, as reimbursement for utilities or services furnished, after the date of the enactment of this Act, under subsection (a) of such section. 2806. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e). 2807. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization projects Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: , to specifically include any variances associated with litigation costs. 2807A. Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization Initiative Not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a report to Congress on the Military Housing Privatization Initiative under subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code. The report shall include the details of any project where the project owner has outstanding local, county, city, town or State tax obligations dating back over 12 months, as determined by a final judgment by a tax authority. 2808. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States Section 2808(h) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2149), is further amended— (1) in paragraph (1), by striking September 30, 2013 and inserting September 30, 2014; and (2) in paragraph (2), by striking fiscal year 2014 and inserting fiscal year 2015. 2809. Development of master plans for major military installations Section 2864 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking At a time and inserting (1) At a time; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) To address the requirements under paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include consideration of— (A) planning for compact and infill development; (B) horizontal and vertical mixed-use development; (C) the full lifecycle costs of planning decisions; (D) healthy communities with a focus on walking, running and biking infrastructure, pedestrian and cycling plans, and community green and garden space; and (E) capacity planning through the establishment of growth boundaries around cantonment areas to focus development towards the core and preserve range and training space. . (2) in subsection (b)— (A) by striking The transportation and inserting (1) The transportation; and (B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (2) To address the requirements under subsection (a) and paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include consideration of ways to diversify and connect transit systems that do not neglect the pedestrian realm and enable safe walking or biking. ; (3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (e); and (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: (c) Vertical mixed uses A master plan for a major military installation shall be designed to strongly multi-story, mixed-use facility solutions that are sited in walkable complexes so as to avoid, when reasonable, single-purpose, inflexible facilities that are sited in a sprawling manner. Vertical mixed-use infrastructure can integrate government, non-government, or jointly financed construction within a single unit. (d) Savings clause Nothing in this section shall supercede the requirements of section 2859(a) of this title. . B Real Property and Facilities Administration 2811. Codification of policies and requirements regarding closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries (a) Redesignation of existing reporting requirement Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (b) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively, and in subparagraph (A), as redesignated, by striking subsection (a)(2) and inserting paragraph (1)(B); (3) by striking (b) Report elements.—A report under subsection (a) and inserting (2) A report under paragraph (1); and (4) by striking (a) Annual status report.—and inserting (b) Annual report on status of overseas closures and realignments and master plans.—(1). (b) Transfer of provisions (1) Sense of congress Subsection (a) of section 2921 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)— (A) is transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United States Code; and (B) is inserted after the heading of such section as subsection (a). (2) Other provisions Subsections (c), (d), (f), and (g) of such section 2921— (A) are transferred to section 2687a of title 10, United States Code; (B) are inserted at the end of such section in that order; and (C) are redesignated as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) of such section; respectively. (3) Definitions Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by adding after subsection (f), as added and redesignated by paragraph (2), the following new subsection: (g) Definitions In this section: (1) The term fair market value of the improvements means the value of improvements determined by the Secretary of Defense on the basis of their highest use. (2) The term improvements includes new construction of facilities and all additions, improvements, modifications, or renovations made to existing facilities or to real property, without regard to whether they were carried out with appropriated or nonappropriated funds. . (c) Conforming amendments Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is further amended— (1) in subsection (c), as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(2)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking Establishment of; (ii) by striking the first sentence; and (iii) in the second sentence, by striking such account and inserting the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account; and (B) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking Armed Forces and inserting armed forces; (2) in subsection (d), as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(2)— (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) after Realignment Act; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking section 2685 of title 10, United States Code and inserting section 2685 of this title; and (ii) in paragraph (2), by striking Armed Forces both places it appears and inserting armed forces; and (3) in subsection (f), as transferred and redesignated by subsection (b)(2), by striking section 480 of title 10, United States Code in paragraph (3) and inserting section 480 of this title 10. (d) Repeal of superseded provisions (1) Repeal Section 2921 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is repealed. (2) Treatment of special account The repeal of such section shall not affect the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account established by subsection (c)(1) of such section, amounts in such account, or the continued use of such account as provided in section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section. 2812. Report on utilization of Department of Defense real property (a) Report required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the utilization of real property across the Department of Defense. (b) Elements of report The report required by subsection (a) shall describe the following: (1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for maximizing utilization of existing facilities, progress implementing this strategy, and obstacles to implementing this strategy. (2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to systematically collect, process, and analyze data on real property utilization to aid in the planning and implementation of the strategy referred to in paragraph (1). (3) The number of underutilized Department facilities, to be defined as facilities rated less than 66 percent utilization, and unutilized Department facilities, to be defined as facilities rated at zero percent utilization, in the Real Property Inventory Database of the Department of Defense. (4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such underutilized and unutilized Department facilities. (5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to dispose of underutilized and unutilized facilities. (c) Classified annex The report required by subsection (a) may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe the matters required by subsection (b). 2813. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, Fort Carson was established in 1942 and has since been a vital contributor to our Nation’s defense and a valued part of the State of Colorado. (2) The units at Fort Carson have served with a great honor and distinction in the current War on Terror. (3) The current Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site near Fort Carson, Colorado, plays an important role in training our men and women in uniform so they are as prepared and effective as possible before going off to war. (b) Conditions on expansion The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not acquire any land to expand the size of the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site near Fort Carson, Colorado, unless each of the following occurs: (1) The land acquisition is specifically authorized in an Act of Congress enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Funds are specifically appropriated for the land acquisition. (3) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the Army, as the case may be, completes an environmental impact statement with respect to the land acquisition. C Energy Security 2821. Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum certification Section 2830(b)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1695), as amended by section 2823(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2153), is amended by striking or 2013 and inserting , 2013, or 2014. D Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 2831. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended in the first sentence by striking calendar year and inserting fiscal year. 2832. Repeal of certain restrictions on realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region Section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2155) is repealed. E Land Conveyances 2841. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California (a) Authority The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all right, title, and interest in and to real property, including improvements thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County, California, that was initially constructed under the former section 2828(g) of title 10, United States Code (commonly known as the Build to Lease program), as added by section 801 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98–115; 97 Stat 782). (b) Use Upon acquiring the real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as provided in sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United States Code. 2842. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California (in this section referred to as the County), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of former Oxnard Air Force Base for the purpose of permitting the County to use the property for public purposes. (b) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Navy shall require the County to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the County. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (c) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. (d) Additional terms The Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2843. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Navy may convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this section referred to as the Port Authority) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately .595 acres located at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Secretary may void any land use restrictions associated with the property to be conveyed under this subsection. (b) Consideration (1) Amount and determination As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority shall pay to the Secretary of the Navy an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined by the Secretary. The Secretary’s determination of fair market value shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion of cash payment of consideration, the Secretary may accept in-kind consideration. (2) Treatment of cash consideration The Secretary shall deposit any cash payment received under paragraph (1) in the special account in the Treasury established for that Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code. The entire amount deposited shall be available for use in accordance with paragraph (1)(D) of such subsection. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Port Authority to reimburse the Secretary to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Port Authority. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (d) Compliance with environmental laws Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.). (e) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. (f) Additional terms and conditions The Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 2844. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (a) Conveyance required Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land Management, shall convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to certain lands comprising approximately 420 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled Proposed Camp Williams Land Transfer and dated June 14, 2011, which are located within the boundaries of the public lands currently withdrawn for military use by the Utah National Guard and known as Camp Williams, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the Utah National Guard to use the conveyed land as provided in subsection (c). (b) Supersedence of executive order Executive Order No. 1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public Law 101–628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only insofar as it affects the lands identified for conveyance to the State of Utah under subsection (a). (c) Reversionary interest The lands conveyed to the State of Utah under subsection (a) shall revert to the United States if the Secretary of Defense determines that the land, or any portion thereof, is sold or attempted to be sold, or that the land, or any portion thereof, is used for non-National Guard or non-national defense purposes. (d) Hazardous materials With respect to any portion of the land conveyed under subsection (a) that the Secretary of Defense determines is subject to reversion under subsection (c), if the Secretary of Defense also determines that the portion of the conveyed land contains hazardous materials, the State of Utah shall pay the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of that portion of the land, and the reversionary interest shall not apply to that portion of the land. 2845. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch Mountains, Utah (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in this section referred to as the State), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the structures, including equipment and any other personal property related thereto, comprising the Air National Guard radar site located on Francis Peak, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the State to use the structures to support emergency public safety communications, including 911 emergency response service for Northern Utah. (b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary of the Air Force may require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (c) Description of Property The exact inventory of equipment and other personal property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary of the Air Force. (d) Time of conveyance The conveyance under this section shall occur as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act. Until such time as the conveyance occurs, the Secretary of the Air Force shall take no action with regard to the structures described in subsection (a) that will result in the likely disruption of emergency communications by the State and local authorities. (e) Additional Terms and Conditions The Secretary of the Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. (f) Continuation of land use permit The conveyance of the structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, that was issued by the Forest Service for placement and use of the structures. (g) Duration of authority The authority to make a conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of— (1) September 30, 2014; or (2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015. 2846. Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia (a) Sense of congress regarding need for conveyance It is the sense of Congress that— (1) the historic features of former Fort Monroe in Hampton, Virginia, are being degraded because of the lack of Department of the Army facility sustainment associated with the former Fort Monroe; and (2) it is in the best interest of the Secretary of the Army and the Commonwealth of Virginia (in this section referred to as the Commonwealth) to expeditiously convey, consistent with the Fort Monroe Reuse Plan and the Programmatic Agreement dated April 27, 2009, certain portions of former Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth. (b) Conveyance authorized Pursuant to 2905(b)(4) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), the Secretary of the Army shall convey to the Commonwealth all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to approximately 70.431 acres of real property at former Fort Monroe depicted as areas 4–1 and 4–2 on the map titled Plat Showing 8 Parcels of Land Totaling +/-564.519 Acres Situated on Fort Monroe, Virginia, Boundary Survey, prepared by the Norfolk District, Army Corps of Engineers, and dated August 17, 2009 (in this section referred to as the Map). (c) Timing of conveyance The Secretary of the Army shall exercise the authority provided by subsection (b) only concurrent, as near in time as possible, with the reversion to the Commonwealth of approximately 371.77 acres of property depicted as areas 3 and 5 on the Map. (d) Conditions of conveyance As a condition of the conveyance of real property under subsection (b)— (1) the Commonwealth shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the Army to share equally with the United States, after conveyance of property areas 4–1 and 4–2, the net proceeds derived from any subsequent conveyance of these parcels to third-party buyers or from any lease of areas 4–1 or 4–2, payable over a period of seven years following the conveyance by the Secretary; (2) the parties shall agree to transfer authority over the utility systems at Fort Monroe to the Commonwealth in return for receiving service on the same relative terms and conditions that the Department of the Army provided service during its ownership of the utilities; and (3) the Secretary will resolve all issues with Dominion Virginia Power and will be responsible for maintaining electrical service in its name until such resolution has been obtained. (e) Savings provision Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.). (f) Additional terms and conditions The parties may agree to such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under this section as the parties consider appropriate to protect their respective interests. 2847. Land conveyance, Mifflin County United States Army Reserve Center, Lewistown, Pennsylvania (a) Conveyance authorized The Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to Derry Township, Pennsylvania (in this section referred to as the Township), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon and improvements related thereto, consisting of approximately 4.52 acres and containing the Mifflin County Army Reserve Center located at 73 Reserve Lane, Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number 16,01–0113J), for the purpose of permitting the Township to use the parcel for a regional police headquarters or other public purposes. (b) Interim lease Until such time as the real property described in subsection (a) is conveyed to the Township, the Secretary may lease the property to the Township. (c) Payment of costs of conveyance (1) Payment required The Secretary shall require the Township to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Township in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Township. (2) Treatment of amounts received Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. (d) Conditions of conveyance The conveyance of the real property under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that the Township not use any Federal funds to cover— (1) any portion of the conveyance costs required by subsection (c) to be paid by the Township; or (2) to cover the costs for the design or construction of any facility on the property. (e) Description of property The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. (f) Additional terms The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. F Other Matters 2861. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization Act of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2391 note), as amended by section 4212(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2664), is further amended— (1) by inserting and at the end of paragraph (1); (2) by striking ; and at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting a period; and (3) by striking paragraph (3). 2862. Redesignation of the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies as the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (a) Redesignation The Department of Defense regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (b) Conforming amendments (1) Reference to regional centers for strategic studies Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies and inserting Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (2) Acceptance of gifts and donations Section 2611(a)(2)(B) of such title is amended by striking Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies and inserting Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. (c) References Any reference to the Department of Defense Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. 2863. Redesignation of the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences as the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing (a) Redesignation The Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences is hereby renamed the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing. (b) References Any reference to the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing. 2864. Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking Aviation Center and inserting National Museum. 2865. Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in Riverside, California (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) The most reliable statistics regarding the number of members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross indicate that 126,318 members of the Armed Forces received the medal during World War II, approximately 21,000 members received the medal during the Korean conflict, and 21,647 members received the medal during the Vietnam War. Since the end of the Vietnam War, more than 203 Armed Forces members have received the medal in times of conflict. (2) The National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, burned down in 1973, and thus many more recipients of the Distinguished Flying Cross may be undocumented. Currently, the Department of Defense continues to locate and identify members of the Armed Forces who have received the medal and are undocumented. (3) The United States currently lacks a national memorial dedicated to the bravery and sacrifice of those members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves by heroic deeds performed in aerial flight. (4) An appropriate memorial to current and former members of the Armed Forces is under construction at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California. (5) This memorial will honor all those members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished themselves in aerial flight, whether documentation of such members who earned the Distinguished Flying Cross exists or not. (b) Designation The memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, located at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, is hereby designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial. (c) Effect of designation The national memorial designated by this section is not a unit of the National Park System, and the designation of the national memorial shall not be construed to require or permit Federal funds to be expended for any purpose related to the national memorial. 2866. Establishment of military divers memorial at Washington Navy Yard (a) Memorial authorized Consistent with the sense of the Congress expressed in section 2855 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, the Secretary of the Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain, at a suitable location at the former Navy Dive School at the Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia, a memorial to honor the members of the United States Armed Forces who have served as divers and whose service in defense of the United States has been carried out beneath the waters of the world. (b) Location and design of monument The actual location at the Washington Navy Yard for the memorial authorized by subsection (a) and the final design of the memorial shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary. In selecting the site to serve as the location for the memorial, the Secretary shall seek to maximize visitor access to the memorial. (c) Military support The Secretary shall provide military ceremonial support at the dedication of the memorial authorized by subsection (a). (d) Use of federal funds prohibited Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may accept and expend contributions of non-Federal funds and resources for such purposes. 2867. Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials (a) Inclusion of emblems of belief authorized Chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 2115. Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials (a) Authorized inclusion For the purpose of honoring the sacrifice of members of the United States Armed Forces, including those members who make the ultimate sacrifice in defense of the United States, emblems of belief may be included as part of— (1) a military memorial that is established or acquired by the United States Government; or (2) a military memorial that is not established by the United States Government, but for which the American Battle Monuments Commission cooperated in the establishment of the memorial. (b) Scope of inclusion When including emblems of belief as part of a military memorial, any approved emblem of belief may be included on such a memorial. The list of approved emblems of belief shall include, at a minimum, all those emblems of belief authorized by the National Cemetery Administration. (c) Definitions In this section: (1) The terms emblem of belief and emblems of belief refer to the emblems of belief contained on the list maintained by the National Cemetery Administration for placement on Government-provided headstones and markers. (2) The term military memorial means a memorial or monument commemorating the service of the United States Armed Forces. The term includes works of architecture and art described in section 2105(b) of this title. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following: 2115. Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials. . XXIX Overseas Contingency Operations Military Construction 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project (a) Outside the united states The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: Army: Outside the United States CountryInstallationAmount CubaGuantanamo Bay$247,400,000 (b) Use of unobligated prior-year military construction funds To carry out the military construction project set forth in the table in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may make available to the Secretary of the Army available, unobligated military construction funds appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2014. (c) Congressional notification The Secretary of the Army shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the military construction project set forth in the table in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations. (d) Briefing on infrastructure to support Joint Task Force, Guantanamo (1) Briefing required The Secretary of Defense shall brief the congressional defense committees on each of the following: (A) A description of each of the following costs, broken down by fiscal year, for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2013: (i) The costs of constructing the permanent and temporary infrastructure to support the detention operations at such Naval Station. (ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment, maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting the detention operations at such Naval Station. (iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractors associated with the detention operations at such Naval Station. (iv) The costs of operation and maintenance, shown for each military department and account, associated with carrying out military commissions for individuals detained at such Naval Station. (v) The costs associated with the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Rule of Law and Detainee Policy), the Periodic Review Services, and studies and task forces funded by the Department of Defense that relate to the detention operations at such Naval Station. (vi) Any other costs associated with supporting the detention operations at such Naval Station. (B) A master plan for the continuation of detention operations by Joint Task Force Guantanamo, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, during the time period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the 66th birthday of the youngest individual who is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on the date of the enactment of this Act, including— (i) a description of any infrastructure projects that the Secretary determines are required for the continuation of such detention operations, including new requirements and replacement of existing infrastructure; (ii) an estimate of the total military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractor costs associated with the continuation of such detention operations; (iii) an estimate of the total operation and maintenance costs associated with the continuation of such detention operations; (iv) an estimate of the total costs associated with carrying out military commissions for individuals detained at such Naval Station; and (v) an estimate of any other costs associated with the continuation of such detention operations. (C) A cost estimate, itemized by construction project, of the infrastructure investments identified in the master plan described in subparagraph (B). (D) A detailed estimate of the annual costs projected to repair, sustain, and maintain the facilities that are in use by Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, or are identified in the master plan described in subparagraph (B). (2) Presidential plan Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan describing each of the following: (A) The locations to which the President seeks to transfer individuals detained at Guantanamo who have been identified for continued detention or prosecution. (B) The individuals detained at Guantanamo who the President seeks to transfer to overseas locations, the overseas locations to which the President seeks to transfer such individuals, and the conditions under which the President would transfer such individuals to such locations. (C) The proposal of the President for the detention and treatment of individuals captured overseas in the future who are suspected of being terrorists. (D) The proposal of the President regarding the disposition of the individuals detained at the detention facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, who have been identified as enduring security threats to the United States. (E) For any location in the United States to which the President seeks to transfer such an individual, estimates of each of the following costs: (i) The costs of constructing infrastructure to support detention operations or prosecution at such location. (ii) The costs of facility repair, sustainment, maintenance, and operation of all infrastructure supporting detention operations or prosecution at such location. (iii) The costs of military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractors associated with the detention operations or prosecution at such location, including any costs likely to be incurred by other Federal departments or agencies or State or local governments. (iv) Any other costs associated with supporting the detention operations or prosecution at such location. XXX Military Land Transfers and Withdrawals to Support Readiness and Security A Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 3001. Withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana (a) Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights and except as provided in this subtitle, the public lands and interests in lands described in subsection (c), and all other areas within the boundaries of such lands as depicted on the map provided for by subsection (d) that may become subject to the operation of the public land laws, are hereby withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing laws. (b) Reservation; purpose Subject to the limitations and restrictions contained in section 3003, the public lands withdrawn by subsection (a) are reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for the following purposes: (1) The conduct of training for active and reserve components of the Armed Forces. (2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of organizational support and maintenance facilities for component units conducting training. (3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department of Military Affairs, except that any such use may not interfere with purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2). (4) The conduct of training by State and local law enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and public education institutions, except that any such use may not interfere with military training activities. (5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs. (c) Land Description The public lands and interests in lands withdrawn and reserved by this section comprise approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater County, Montana, as generally depicted as Proposed Land Withdrawal on the map titled Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal, dated April 10, 2013. (d) Legal description and map (1) In general As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of the public land withdrawn under subsection (a) and a copy of a map depicting the legal description of the withdrawn land. (2) Force of law The legal description and map published under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct errors in the legal description. (3) Reimbursement of costs The Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in implementing this subsection. (e) Indian tribes Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed as altering any rights reserved for an Indian tribe for tribal use of lands within the military land withdrawal by treaty or Federal law. The Secretary of the Army shall consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of the military land withdrawal before taking action within the military land withdrawal affecting tribal rights or cultural resources protected by treaty or Federal law. 3002. Management of withdrawn and reserved lands During the period of the withdrawal and reservation specified in section 3005, the Secretary of the Army shall manage the public lands withdrawn by section 3001 for the purposes specified in subsection (b) of such section, subject to the limitations and restrictions contained in section 3003. 3003. Special rules governing minerals management (a) Indian Creek Mine (1) In general Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001, locatable mineral activities in the approved Indian Creek Mine plan of operations, MTM–78300, shall be regulated pursuant to subparts 3715 and 3809 of title 43, Code of Federal Regulations. Of the lands withdrawn by section 3001, the land area subject to the approved plan of operations shall permanently remain open to the amendment or relocation of mining claims (or both) under the Act of May 10, 1872 (commonly known as the General Mining Act of 1872; 30 U.S.C. 22 et seq.) to the extent necessary to preserve the mining operations described in the approved plan of operations. (2) Restrictions on Secretary of the Army The Secretary of the Army shall make no determination that the disposition of or exploration for minerals as provided for in the approved plan of operations is inconsistent with the defense-related uses of the lands covered by the military land withdrawal. The coordination of such disposition of and exploration for minerals with defense-related uses of such lands shall be determined pursuant to procedures in an agreement provided for under subsection (c). (b) Removal of unexploded ordnance on lands To be mined (1) Removal activities Subject to the availability of funds appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the Army shall remove unexploded ordnance on lands withdrawn by section 3001 that are subject to mining under subsection (a), consistent with applicable Federal and State law. The Secretary of the Army may engage in such removal of unexploded ordnance in phases to accommodate the development of the Indian Creek Mine pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Report on removal activities The Secretary of the Army shall annually submit to the Secretary of the Interior a report regarding the unexploded ordnance removal activities for the previous fiscal year performed pursuant to this subsection. The report shall include— (A) the amounts of funding expended for unexploded ordnance removal on the lands withdrawn by section 3001; and (B) the identification of the lands cleared of unexploded ordnance and approved for mining activities by the Secretary of the Interior. (c) Implementation agreement for mining activities The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall enter into an agreement to implement this section with regard to coordination of defense-related uses and mining and the ongoing removal of unexploded ordnance. The duration of the agreement shall be the same as the period of the withdrawal under section 3001, but may be amended from time to time. The agreement shall provide the following: (1) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any successor or assign of the approved Indian Creek Mine mining plan of operations, MTM–78300, is invited to be a party to the agreement. (2) Provisions regarding the day-to-day joint-use of the Limestone Hills Training Area. (3) Provisions addressing when military and other authorized uses of the withdrawn lands will occur. (4) Provisions regarding when and where military use or training with explosive material will occur. (5) Provisions regarding the scheduling of training activities conducted within the withdrawn area that restrict mining activities and procedures for deconfliction with mining operations, including parameters for notification and sanction of anticipated changes to the schedule. (6) Provisions regarding liability and compensation for damages or injury caused by mining or military training activities. (7) Provisions for periodic review of the agreement for its adequacy, effectiveness, and need for revision. (8) Procedures for access through mining operations covered by this section to training areas within the boundaries of the Limestone Hills Training Area. (9) Procedures for scheduling of the removal of unexploded ordnance. (d) Existing memorandum of agreement Until such time as the agreement required under subsection (c) becomes effective, the compatible joint use of the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3001 shall be governed, to the extent compatible, by the terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Agreement among the Montana Army National Guard, Graymont Western US Inc. and the Bureau of Land Management. 3004. Grazing (a) Issuance and administration of permits and leases The issuance and administration of grazing permits and leases, including their renewal, on the public lands withdrawn by section 3001 shall be managed by the Secretary of the Interior consistent with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to such permits and leases. (b) Safety requirements With respect to any grazing permit or lease issued after the date of the enactment of this Act for lands withdrawn by section 3001, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish procedures that are consistent with Department of the Army explosive and range safety standards and that provide for the safe use of any such lands. (c) Assignment The Secretary of the Interior may, with the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, assign the authority to issue and to administer grazing permits and leases to the Secretary of the Army, except that such an assignment may not include the authority to discontinue grazing on the lands withdrawn by section 3001. 3005. Duration of withdrawal and reservation The military land withdrawal made by section 3001 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 3006. Payments in lieu of taxes The lands withdrawn by section 3001 shall remain eligible as entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United States Code. 3007. Hunting, fishing and trapping All hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn by section 3001 shall be conducted in accordance with section 2671 of title 10, United States Code. 3008. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands withdrawn by section 3001; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands withdrawn by section 3001, except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. 3009. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (a) Required activities The Secretary of the Army shall, consistent with any applicable land management plan, take necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a result of military activities on the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3001, including fires outside those lands that spread from the withdrawn land and which occurred as a result of such activities. (b) Cooperation of secretary of the interior At the request of the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of such fires and shall be reimbursed for such assistance by the Secretary of the Army. Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, in advance, funds to reimburse the costs of the Department of the Interior in providing such assistance. 3010. On-going decontamination During the withdrawal and reservation authorized by section 3001, the Secretary of the Army shall maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose, a program of decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related uses on such lands consistent with applicable Federal and State law. The Secretary of Defense shall include a description of such decontamination activities in the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States Code. 3011. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation (a) Notice To the extent practicable, no later than five years before the termination of the withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001, the Secretary of the Army shall notify the Secretary of the Interior whether the Secretary of the Army will have a continuing defense-related need for any of the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3001 after the termination date of such withdrawal and reservation. The Secretary of the Army shall provide a copy of the notice to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. (b) Filing for extension If the Secretary of the Army concludes that there will be a continuing defense-related need for any of the withdrawn and reserved lands after the termination date, the Secretary of the Army shall file an application for extension of the withdrawal and reservation of such needed lands in accordance with the regulations and procedures of the Department of the Interior applicable to the extension of withdrawals and reservations. 3012. Limitation on subsequent availability of lands for appropriation At the time of termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001, the previously withdrawn lands shall not be open to any form of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing laws, until the Secretary of the Interior publishes in the Federal Register an appropriate order specifying the date upon which such lands shall be restored to the public domain and opened for such purposes. 3013. Relinquishment (a) Notice of intention to relinquish If, during the period of withdrawal and reservation under section 3001, the Secretary of the Army decides to relinquish any or all of the lands withdrawn and reserved, the Secretary of the Army shall file a notice of intention to relinquish with the Secretary of the Interior. (b) Determination of contamination As a part of the notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall include a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the lands that are to be relinquished are contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances. (c) Public notice The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to relinquish, including the determination concerning the contaminated state of the lands. (d) Decontamination of lands to be relinquished (1) Conditions requiring decontamination If land subject of a notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection (a) is contaminated, and the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, determines that decontamination is practicable and economically feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use and value of the land) and that, upon decontamination, the land could be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing laws, the Secretary of the Army shall decontaminate the land to the extent that funds are appropriated for such purpose. (2) Discretion if conditions not met If the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the Secretary of the Army, concludes that decontamination of land subject of a notice of intention to relinquish pursuant to subsection (a) is not practicable or economically feasible, or that the land cannot be decontaminated sufficiently to be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws, or if Congress does not appropriate sufficient funds for the decontamination of such land, the Secretary of the Interior shall not be required to accept the land proposed for relinquishment. (3) Response If the Secretary of the Interior declines to accept the lands that have been proposed for relinquishment because of their contaminated state, or if at the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001 the Secretary of the Interior determines that some of the lands withdrawn and reserved are contaminated to an extent which prevents opening such contaminated lands to operation of the public land laws— (A) the Secretary of the Army shall take appropriate steps to warn the public of the contaminated state of such lands and any risks associated with entry onto such lands; (B) after the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, the Secretary of the Army shall undertake no activities on such lands except in connection with decontamination of such lands; and (C) the Secretary of the Army shall report to the Secretary of the Interior and to the Congress concerning the status of such lands and all actions taken in furtherance of this paragraph. (e) Revocation authority Upon deciding that it is in the public interest to accept the lands proposed for relinquishment pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior may order the revocation of the withdrawal and reservation made by section 3001 as it applies to such lands. The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register the revocation order, which shall— (1) terminate the withdrawal and reservation; (2) constitute official acceptance of the lands by the Secretary of the Interior; and (3) state the date upon which the lands will be opened to the operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws. (f) Acceptance by secretary of the interior Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the Secretary of the Interior to accept the lands proposed for relinquishment if the Secretary determines that such lands are not suitable for return to the public domain. If the Secretary makes such a determination, the Secretary shall provide notice of the determination to Congress. B White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico 3021. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico (a) Transfer required Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Dona Ana County, New Mexico, consisting of approximately 5,100 acres depicted as Parcel 1 on the map titled White Sands Missile Range Land Reservation and dated January 4, 2013. (b) Use of transferred land Upon the receipt of the land under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall include the land as part of White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and authorize use of the land for military purposes. (c) Legal description and map (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). (2) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct errors in the legal description. (d) Reimbursement of costs The transfer required by subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under subsection (c). (e) Treatment of grazing leases If a grazing permit or lease exists on the date of the enactment of this Act for any portion of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer or relocate the grazing allotments associated with the permit or lease to other public land, acceptable to the permit or lease holder, so that the grazing continues to have the same value to the holder. 3022. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. 3023. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be transferred under section 3021 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army. C Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 3031. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California (a) Transfer required Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, consisting of approximately 1,045,000 acres in Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, as generally depicted on the map titled Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Withdrawal - Renewal and dated 2012. (b) Use of transferred land Upon the receipt of the land under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include the land as part of the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California, and authorize use of the land for military purposes. (c) Legal description and map (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). (2) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct errors in the legal description and map. (d) Reimbursement of costs The transfer required by subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under subsection (c). 3032. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. 3033. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be transferred under section 3031 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the lands remain under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. D Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 3041. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California (a) Transfer required The Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, consisting of approximately 226,711 acres, as generally depicted on the map titled Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range Proposed–Withdrawal dated 1987 (revised July 1993), and identified as WESTDIV Drawing No. C–102370, which was prepared by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command of the Department of the Navy and is on file with the California State Office of the Bureau of Land Management. (b) Valid existing rights The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid existing rights, including any property, easements, or improvements held by the Bureau of Reclamation and appurtenant to the Coachella Canal. The Secretary of the Navy shall provide for reasonable access by the Bureau of Reclamation for inspection and maintenance purposes not inconsistent with military training. (c) Time for conveyance The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than the date of the completion of the boundary realignment required by section 3043. (d) Map and legal description (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). (2) Submission to congress The Secretary of the Interior shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives— (A) a copy of the legal description prepared under paragraph (1); and (B) a map depicting the legal description of the transferred public land. (3) Availability for public inspection Copies of the legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of— (A) the Bureau of Land Management; (B) the Office of the Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona; (C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region Southwest; and (D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy. (4) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal description or map. (5) Reimbursement of costs The transfer required by subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under this subsection. 3042. Management and use of transferred land (a) Use of transferred land Upon the receipt of the land under section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall administer the land as the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California, and continue to authorize use of the land for military purposes. (b) Protection of desert tortoise Nothing in the transfer required by section 3041 shall affect the prior designation of certain lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range as critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus Agassizii). (c) Withdrawal of Mineral Estate Subject to valid existing rights, the mineral estate of the land to be transferred under section 3041 are withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral and geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the land is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. (d) Integrated natural resources management plan Not later than one year after the transfer of the land under section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the transferred land and for land that, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy underlying the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. 3043. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title (a) Realignment; purpose The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, to improve public safety and management of the Range, consistent with the following: (1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is entirely on public land under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior. (2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be delineated by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning at its western terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12 East, Section 6 eastward to Township 8 South, Range 17 East, Section 32 where it leaves the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. (b) Transfers related to realignment The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall make such transfers of administrative jurisdiction as may be necessary to reflect the results of the boundary realignment carried out pursuant to subsection (a). (c) Applicability of national environmental policy act of 1969 The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land made under subsection (b) or any decontamination actions undertaken in connection with such a transfer. (d) Decontamination The Secretary of the Navy shall maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a program of decontamination of any contamination caused by defense-related uses on land transferred under subsection (b). The Secretary of Defense shall include a description of such decontamination activities in the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States Code. (e) Timeline The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b) shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 3044. Effect of termination of military use (a) Notice and effect Upon a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that there is no longer a military need for all or portions of the land transferred under section 3041, the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. (b) Contamination Before transmitting a notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land to be transferred are contaminated with explosive, toxic, or other hazardous materials. A copy of the determination shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of the notice and the determination shall be published in the Federal Register. (c) Decontamination The Secretary of the Navy shall decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a notice under subsection (a) if— (1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that— (A) decontamination is practicable and economically feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use and value of the land); and (B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened to operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws; and (2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination. (d) Alternative The Secretary of the Interior is not required to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds for the decontamination of the land. 3045. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (title VIII of Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4505), the withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under section 3041 shall not terminate until the date on which the land transfer required by section 3041 is executed. 3046. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. E Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 3051. Designation of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (a) Designation The approximately 188,000 acres of public land and interests in land administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management in San Bernardino County, California, as generally depicted as the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area on the map titled Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area and Transfer of the Southern Study Area and dated April 11, 2013, are hereby designated as the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. (b) Recreational and conservation use The Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area is designated for the following purposes: (1) Public recreation (including off-highway vehicle use, camping, and hiking) when the lands are not used for military training as authorized by section 3052. (2) Natural resources conservation. (c) Withdrawal The public land and interests in land included in the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area are hereby withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and the mineral leasing and geothermal leasing laws. (d) Treatment of existing rights The designation of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area and the withdrawal of the public land and interests in land included in the Recreation Area are subject to valid existing rights. 3052. Limited biannual Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms use of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (a) Use for military purposes authorized Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior shall authorize the Secretary of the Navy to utilize portions of Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area twice in each calendar year for up to a total of 60 days per year for the following purposes: (1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver field training for large-scale Marine air-ground task forces. (2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges. (3) Equipment and tactics development. (4) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the purposes specified in the preceding paragraphs. (b) Conditions on military use (1) Consultation and public participation requirements Before the Secretary of the Navy requests the two time periods for military use of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area in a calendar year, the Secretary of the Navy shall— (A) consult with the Secretary of the Interior regarding the best times for military use to reduce interference with or interruption of nonmilitary activities authorized by section 3051(b); and (B) provide for public awareness of and participation in the selection process. (2) Public notice The Secretary of the Navy shall provide advance, wide-spread notice before any closure of public lands for military use under this section. (3) Public safety Military use of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area during the biannual periods authorized by subsection (a) shall be conducted in the presence of sufficient range safety officers to ensure the safety of military personnel and civilians. (4) Certain types of ordnance prohibited The Secretary of the Navy shall prohibit the use of dud-producing ordnance in any military training conducted under subsection (a). (c) Implementing agreement (1) Agreement required; required terms The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a written agreement to implement this section. The agreement shall include a provision for periodic review of the agreement for its adequacy, effectiveness, and need for revision. (2) Additional terms The agreement may provide for— (A) the integration of the management plans of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy; (B) delegation to civilian law enforcement personnel of the Department of the Navy of the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to enforce the laws relating to protection of natural and cultural resources and of fish and wildlife; and (C) the sharing of resources in order to most efficiently and effectively manage the lands. (d) Duration Any agreement for the military use of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area shall terminate not later than March 31, 2039. 3053. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California (a) Transfer required Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer, without reimbursement, to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management consisting of approximately 20,000 acres in San Bernardino County, California, as generally depicted as the Southern Study Area on the map referred to in section 3051. (b) Use of transferred land Upon the receipt of the land under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall include the land as part of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California, and authorize use of the land for military purposes. (c) Legal description and map (1) Preparation and publication The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description and map of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). (2) Force of law The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal description and map. (d) Reimbursement of costs The Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this section. 3054. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. F Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada 3061. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, the Federal land described in subsection (b). (b) Description of Federal land The Federal land referred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of approximately 400 acres of land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior that— (1) is adjacent to Naval Air Station Fallon in Churchill County, Nevada; and (2) was withdrawn under Public Land Order 6834 (NV–943–4214–10; N–37875). (c) Management On transfer of the Federal land described under subsection (b) to the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Navy shall have full jurisdiction, custody, and control of the Federal land. 3062. Water rights (a) Water rights Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed— (1) to establish a reservation in favor of the United States with respect to any water or water right on lands transferred by this subtitle; or (2) to authorize the appropriation of water on lands transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable State law. (b) Effect on previously acquired or reserved water rights This section shall not be construed to affect any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of the enactment of this Act. 3063. Withdrawal Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land to be transferred under section 3061 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws and geothermal leasing laws, so long as the land remains under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. C DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS XXXI DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS A National Security Programs Authorizations 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Authorization of Appropriations Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. (b) Authorization of New Plant Projects From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: Project 14–D–710, Device Assembly Facility Argus Installation Project, Nevada National Security Site, Las Vegas, Nevada, $14,000,000 Project 14–D–901, Spent Fueling Handling Recapitalization Project, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000. Project 14–D–902, KL Materials Characterization Laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York, $1,000,000. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3103. Other defense activities Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701. 3104. Energy security and assurance Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for energy security and assurance programs necessary for national security as specified in the funding table in section 4701. B Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to read as follows: (c) Operations and activities to be carried out consistent with certain principles In carrying out the mission of the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure that all operations and activities of the Administration are consistent with the principles of— (1) protecting the environment; (2) safeguarding the safety and health of the public and of the workforce of the Administration; and (3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information in the custody of the Administration. . 3112. Termination of Department of Energy employees to protect national security (a) In general Subtitle C of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 3245. Termination of employees to protect national security (a) Termination authority Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Energy may terminate an employee of the Administration or any element of the Department of Energy that involves nuclear security if the Secretary— (1) determines that the employee acted in a manner that endangers the security of special nuclear material or classified information; (2) considers the termination to be in the interests of the United States; and (3) determines that the procedures prescribed in other provisions of law that authorize the termination of the employment of such employee cannot be invoked in a manner that the Secretary considers consistent with national security. (b) Statements and affidavits (1) To the extent that the Secretary determines that the interests of national security permit, the Secretary shall notify an employee whose employment is terminated under this section of the reasons for the termination. (2) During the 30-day period beginning on the date on which a terminated employee is notified under paragraph (1), the employee may submit to the Secretary statements or affidavits to show why the employee should be restored to duty. (3) If a terminated employee submits statements and affidavits under paragraph (2), the Secretary— (A) shall provide a written response to the employee; and (B) may restore the employment of the employee. (c) Finality A decision by the Secretary to terminate the employment of an employee under this section is final and may not be appealed or reviewed outside the Department. (d) Notification to congressional committees Whenever the Secretary terminates the employment of an employee under the authority of this section, the Secretary shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees of such termination. (e) Preservation of right to seek other employment Any termination of employment under this section does not affect the right of the employee involved to seek or accept employment with any other department or agency of the United States if that employee is declared eligible for such employment by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management. (f) Prohibition on delegation The authority of the Secretary under this section may not be delegated. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3244 the following new item: Sec. 3245. Termination of employees to protect national security. . 3113. Modification of independent cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear facilities (a) In general Section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537) is amended— (1) in subsection (b)(2), by adding after the period at the end the following: Such cost estimates shall be conducted by the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. The Director may delegate carrying out such a cost estimate to another element of the Department of Defense.; and (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows: (c) Authority for further assessments (1) In consultation with the Administrator, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, may conduct an independent cost assessment of any initiative or program of the Administration that is estimated to cost more than $500,000,000. The Director may delegate carrying out such a cost estimate to another element of the Department of Defense. (2) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator, shall request an appropriate official or entity to conduct an independent review of each— (A) guidance for the analysis of alternatives for each covered system or facility before such analysis is conducted; and (B) results of such analysis. (3) The Secretary, acting through the Administrator, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Nuclear Weapons Council each independent review conducted under paragraph (2). (4) In this subsection: (A) The term appropriate official or entity means the following: (i) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (ii) An organization selected by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. (iii) The JASON Defense Advisory Panel. (B) The term covered system or facility means the following: (i) Each nuclear weapon system undergoing life extension at the completion of phase 6.2A, relating to design definition and cost study. (ii) Each new nuclear facility within the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) that is estimated to cost more than $500,000,000 before such facility achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process. . (b) Effective date The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall expire on the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act. Effective on the day after such expiration date, subsection (c) of section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, is hereby revived. (c) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that Congress encourages the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Nuclear Weapons Council to follow the results of the analysis of alternatives of a life extension program or a defense nuclear facility construction project when selecting a final option. 3114. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (a) In general Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 4445. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (a) Plan Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive plan through 2025 for the safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and disposition of nuclear waste contained in the tank farms of Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington. (b) Matters included The plan under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) A list of all requirements, assumptions, and criteria needed to design, construct, and operate the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any required infrastructure facilities at the Hanford Tank Farms. (2) A schedule of activities, construction, and operations at the Hanford Tank Farms and Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant required before 2025 to carry out the safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and disposition of waste in the Hanford Tank Farms. (3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent possible, the retrieval and treatment of lower-risk, low-activity waste while continuing efforts to accelerate the resolution of technical challenges associated with higher-risk, high-activity waste. (4) A description of how the Secretary will— (A) provide adequate protection to workers and the public under the plan; and (B) incorporate into the plan any new science and technical information that was not available before the development of the plan, including new science and technical information not available as of March 2014. (c) Determinations (1) For each requirement, assumption, or criterion identified by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall include in the plan under subsection (a) a determination regarding whether such requirement, assumption or criterion is finalized and will be used to inform planning, design, construction, and operations of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project. (2) For each requirement, assumption, or criterion that the Secretary cannot make a finalized determination for under paragraph (1) by the date the plan under subsection (a) is submitted to the congressional defense committees, the Secretary shall— (A) include in the plan— (i) a description of the requirement, assumption, or criterion; (ii) a list of activities required for the Secretary to make such determination; and (iii) the date on which the Secretary anticipates making such determination; and (B) once the Secretary makes the finalized determination with respect to the requirement, assumption, or criterion, submit to such committees notification that the requirement, assumption, or criterion is finalized and will be used to inform the planning, design, construction, and operations of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project. (3) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary may authorize a change to a requirement, assumption, or criterion that the Secretary determines as finalized under paragraph (1) or (2)(B). (B) The Secretary shall make changes to a requirement, assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary cannot provide adequate protection without making such changes. (C) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a requirement, assumption, or criterion under subparagraph (A) or (B) that will have a material effect on any aspect of the schedule or cost of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant project, the Secretary shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees of such change. (D) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph may be delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4444 the following new item: Sec. 4445. Plan for retrieval, treatment, and disposition of tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. . 3115. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (a) In general Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (a) Authority Subject to subsection (b), a covered official may— (1) carry out a covered procurement action; and (2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, limit, in whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to the basis for carrying out a covered procurement action. (b) Determination and notification Before exercising the authority under subsection (a), a covered official shall— (1) obtain a joint recommendation by the Deputy Secretary of Energy and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Energy, on the basis of a risk assessment conducted by the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the Department of Energy, that there is a significant supply chain risk to a covered system; (2) make a determination in writing, with the concurrence of the Deputy Secretary of Energy, that— (A) carrying out a covered procurement action under subsection (a)(1) is necessary to protect national security by reducing supply chain risk; (B) less intrusive measures are not reasonably available to reduce such supply chain risk; and (C) if the covered official plans to limit disclosure of information under subsection (a)(2), the risk to national security that may result from the disclosure of such information is greater than such risk that may result from not disclosing such information; and (3) submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives written notification of— (A) the joint recommendation under paragraph (1), including a summary of the risk assessment by the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence that serves as the basis for such joint recommendation; (B) the determination under paragraph (2), including— (i) a summary of the basis for such determination; and (ii) a discussion of the less intrusive measures that were considered under subparagraph (B) of such paragraph and the reason that the official determined such measures to not be reasonably available; and (C) the information required by section 2304(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code. (c) Limitation on disclosure If a covered official exercises the authority under subsection (a), the covered official shall— (1) notify appropriate parties of the covered procurement action and the basis for such action only to the extent necessary to carry out the covered procurement action; (2) notify other elements of the Department of Energy or other departments or agencies of the United States that are responsible for procurement that may be subject to the same or similar supply chain risk of the covered procurement action, consistent with the requirements of national security; and (3) ensure the confidentiality of any notification made under paragraph (1) or (2). (d) Delegation A covered official may not delegate the authority provided under this section to an official of the Department of Energy below the level of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Energy. (e) Definitions In this section: (1) The term covered item of supply means an item that is purchased for inclusion in a covered system, and the loss of integrity of which could result in a supply chain risk for a covered system. (2) The term covered official means any of the following: (A) The Under Secretary of Energy. (B) The Under Secretary of Energy for Science. (C) The Administrator for Nuclear Security. (D) The Administrator of the Energy Information Administration. (E) The Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration. (F) The Administrator of the Southeastern Power Administration. (G) The Administrator of the Southwestern Power Administration. (H) The Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration. (I) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Energy. (3) The term covered procurement means— (A) a source selection for a covered system or a covered item of supply involving either a performance specification, as described in paragraph (1)(C)(ii) of section 2305(a) of title 10, United States Code, or an evaluation factor, as described in paragraph (2)(A) of such section, relating to supply chain risk; (B) the consideration of proposals for and issuance of a task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered item of supply if the task or delivery order contract concerned includes a contract clause establishing a requirement relating to supply chain risk; or (C) any contract action involving a contract for a covered system or a covered item of supply if such contract includes a clause establishing requirements relating to supply chain risk. (4) The term covered procurement action means, with respect to an action that occurs in the course of conducting a covered procurement, any of the following: (A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet qualification standards established in accordance with the requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code, for the purpose of reducing supply chain risk in the acquisition of covered systems. (B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve an acceptable rating with respect to an evaluation factor providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in the evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract or the issuance of a task or delivery order. (C) The withholding of consent for a contractor to subcontract with a particular source or the direction to a contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular source from consideration for a subcontract under the contract. (5) The term covered system means— (A) nuclear weapons; (B) components of nuclear weapons; (C) items associated with the design, development, production, and maintenance of nuclear weapons or components of nuclear weapons; and (D) items associated with the surveillance of the nuclear weapon stockpile; and (E) any national security system (as defined in section 3542(b)(2) of title 44, United States Code). (6) The term supply chain risk means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce an unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4805 the following new item: Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. . (c) Effective date Section 4806 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to— (1) contracts that are awarded on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and (2) task and delivery orders that are issued on or after the date that is 180 days after such date of enactment under contracts awarded before, on, or after such date of enactment. 3116. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration (a) Limitation Except as provided by subsection (c), of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National Nuclear Security Administration, $139,500,000 may not be obligated or expended until the date on which the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees— (1) a detailed plan to realize the planned efficiencies; and (2) written certification that the planned efficiencies will be achieved during fiscal year 2014. (b) Unrealized efficiencies If the Administrator does not submit to the congressional defense committees the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the date that is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— (1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not be realized during fiscal year 2014; and (2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned efficiencies to the programs funded under the directed stockpile work and nuclear programs accounts. (c) Exception The limitation in subsection (a) shall not— (1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for directed stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Reactors; or (2) affect the authority of the Secretary under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751). (d) Planned efficiencies defined In this section, the term planned efficiencies means the $106,800,000, with respect to directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with respect to nuclear programs, that the Administrator plans to save during fiscal year 2014 through management efficiency and workforce restructuring reductions, as described in the budget request for fiscal year 2014 that the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. 3117. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Office of the Administrator, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until— (1) the President transmits to Congress the matters required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(f)(2)); (2) the President transmits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576) with respect to such matters for which the Secretary of Energy is responsible; (3) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the reports required to be submitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 3122(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); and (4) the Administrator submits to the congressional defense committees— (A) the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted during 2013 under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)); and (B) the summary of the plan required to be submitted during 2014 under paragraph (1) of such section. 3118. Limitation on availability of funds for Global Threat Reduction Initiative (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, particularly in the current constrained budget environment, the National Nuclear Security Administration should— (1) prioritize its primary mission of sustaining and modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile; and (2) shift funding from secondary missions if required to ensure critical nuclear weapons modernization programs stay on schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to support the military requirements of the United States. (b) Limitation Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Global Threat Reduction Initiative of the National Nuclear Security Administration, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended unless, by not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies to the congressional defense committees that the B61 life extension program will deliver a first production unit in fiscal year 2019. (c) Exception The limitation in subsection (b) shall not affect the authority of the Secretary under Section 4702 of the AEDA (50 U.S.C. 2742). 3119. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response (a) Establishment The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)) a Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response. (b) Duties The center established under subsection (a) shall carry out the following: (1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of Defense Nuclear Security, and the management and operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise a wide range of objective expertise on security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and response forces. (2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards, requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria with respect to security. (3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned with respect to security. (4) Support inspections and oversight activities with respect to security. (5) Promote professional development and training for security professionals. (6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for security-related acquisitions that affect multiple facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. (7) Advocate for continual improvement and security excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise. 3120. Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts (a) Bid protest Subsection (a) of section 3121 of the National Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended by inserting or the date on which a protest with respect to such a contract is resolved before the period at the end. (b) Expected cost savings Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by inserting , including a description of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine such expected cost savings before the semicolon. (c) Naval reactors Subsection (d) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) Naval reactors The requirement for reports under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a management and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility. . 3121. W88–1 warhead and W78–1 warhead life extension options In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall include during such phases a full analysis of feasibility, design definition, and cost estimation for each of the following life extension options: (1) A separate life extension option to produce a W78–1 warhead. (2) A separate life extension option to produce a W88–1 warhead. (3) An interoperable W78/88–1 life extension option. (4) Any other option that the Nuclear Weapons Council considers appropriate. 3122. Extension of principles of pilot program to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) In April 2006, the Administrator for Nuclear Security initiated a pilot program to improve and streamline oversight of the Kansas City Plant of the National Nuclear Security Administration. (2) In a memorandum initiating the pilot, the Administrator cited slow progress in implementing previous efforts to streamline such oversight, saying that such slow progress is a reflection of excessive risk aversion. (3) The pilot program shifted away from reliance on directives of the Department of Energy and toward third-party certification and industrial standards whenever possible—but the pilot program specifically exempted certain high-hazard operations from its scope. (4) An independent assessment conducted one year after initiation of the pilot found approximately $14,000,000 had been saved in fiscal year 2007 because of the pilot program. (5) The independent assessment found that the replacement of Department of Energy prescriptive requirements with site specific standards and operating systems was observed to be a significant cost reduction driver * * * in several business areas, this reduction was accomplished by moving toward the use of metrics and benchmarks rather than transactional oversight.. (6) The independent assessment further found that no immediate or negative impacts were observed as a result of the pilot program and that the lessons learned at [the Kansas City Plant] can and should be applied at other NNSA and DOE sites, while acknowledging that application of such lessons would be limited by the presence of high-risk, high-hazard activities at such locations. (7) The independent assessment concluded, it is our opinion that these elements can be encouraged and developed over time at each NNSA facility, subject to the limitations made necessary by the nature of the site.. (b) Extension of policies (1) In general Except as provided by paragraph (2), the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall— (A) ensure that the principles of the pilot program are permanently implemented at the Kansas City Plant of the National Nuclear Security Administration; and (B) in accordance with paragraph (3), extend such principles of the pilot program, with modifications as the Administrator determines appropriate, to not less than two additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002(5) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(5)), with such principles commencing at each facility not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. (2) Exemption In carrying out the extension of the principles of the pilot program pursuant to subparagraph (A) and (B) of paragraph (1), the Administrator— (A) may exempt high-hazard or high-risk activities from such extension; (B) shall exempt nuclear operations from such extension; and (C) shall focus the initial extension of such principles on low-risk, high-reward initiatives. (3) Implementation (A) In extending the principles of the pilot program to not less than two facilities under paragraph (1)(B), the Administrator shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that— (i) the management and operating contractor for such a facility has sufficiently mature processes, as well as high performance, to enable the extension without undue risk; and (ii) Federal oversight mechanisms are in place and sufficiently mature to enable the extension without undue risk. (B) If the Administrator cannot make a certification under subparagraph (A) with respect to a facility— (i) the Administrator shall delay the extension of the principles of the pilot program to such facility until the date on which the Administrator makes such certification; and (ii) not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report regarding— (I) the improvements to processes, procedures, and performance that are required to make such certification; (II) a plan with respect to the activities that the Administrator will carry out to make such improvements; and (III) the date by which the Administrator expects to make such certification and extend the principles of the pilot program. (4) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term appropriate congressional committees means the following: (i) The congressional defense committees. (ii) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives. (B) The term principles of the pilot program means the principles regarding the use of third-party certification, industrial standards, best business practices, and verification of internal procedures and performance to improve and streamline oversight, as demonstrated in the pilot program at the Kansas City Plant of the Administration described in subsection (a)(1). 3123. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking September 30, 2015 and inserting September 30, 2020. C Reports 3131. Annual report and certification on status of the security of the nuclear security enterprise (a) In general Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows: 4506. Annual report and certification on status of the security of the nuclear security enterprise Not later than September 30 of each year, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy and to the congressional defense committees— (1) a report detailing the status of the security of the nuclear security enterprise, including the status of the security of special nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and classified information at each nuclear weapons production facility and national security laboratory; and (2) written certification that the special nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and classified information in the custody of the Administration are secure. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4506 and inserting the following new item: Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of the security of the nuclear security enterprise. . 3132. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear weapons stockpile (a) Report on assessments Subsection (e) of section 4205 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended— (1) in paragraph (3)— (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and (C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (E) a concise summary of any significant finding investigations initiated or active during the previous year for which the head of the national security laboratory has full or partial responsibility. ; and (2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows: (4) In the case of a report submitted by the Commander of the United States Strategic Command— (A) a discussion of the relative merits of other nuclear weapon types (if any), or compensatory measures (if any) that could be taken, that could enable accomplishment of the missions of the nuclear weapon types to which the assessments relate, should such assessments identify any deficiency with respect to such nuclear weapon types; and (B) a summary of all major assembly releases in place as of the date of the report for the active and inactive nuclear weapon stockpiles. . (b) Reports submitted to the President and Congress Subsection (f) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) If the President does not forward to Congress the matters required under paragraph (2) by the date required under such paragraph, each official specified in subsection (b) shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report, without change, that the official submitted to the Secretary concerned under subsection (e). . 3133. Repeal of certain reporting requirements (a) Report on counterintelligence and security practices at national laboratories (1) In general Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed. (2) Clerical amendment The table of contents at the beginning of the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4507. (b) Reports on advanced supercomputer sales to certain foreign nations Section 3157 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 50 U.S.C. App. 2404 note) is repealed. D Other matters 3141. Congressional advisory panel on the governance of the nuclear security enterprise Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208) is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and inserting October 1, 2013; and (B) in paragraph (2), by striking February 1, 2014 and inserting March 1, 2014; and (2) by amending subsection (f) to read as follows: (f) Termination (1) In general The advisory panel shall terminate not later than September 30, 2014. (2) Final report Before terminating, the advisory panel may submit to the officials and committees specified in subsection (d)(1) a final report that includes a summary of the activities and recommendations of the advisory panel and such other matters as the advisory panel considers appropriate. . 3142. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries (a) Study Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries that includes an assessment of the potential for reusing secondaries in future life extension programs, including— (1) a description of which secondaries could be reused; (2) the number of such secondaries available in the stockpile as of the date of the study; and (3) the number of such secondaries that are planned to be available after such date as a result of the dismantlement of nuclear weapons. (b) Matters included The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: (1) The feasibility and practicability of potential full or partial reuse options with respect to nuclear weapon secondaries. (2) The benefits and risks of reusing such secondaries. (3) A list of technical challenges that must be resolved to certify aged materials under dynamic loading conditions and the full stockpile-to-target sequence of weapons, including a program plan and timeline for resolving such technical challenges and an assessment of the importance of resolving outstanding materials issues on certifying aged secondaries. (4) The potential costs and cost savings of such reuse. (5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for secondaries manufacturing. (6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to build a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure. (c) Submission Not later than March 1, 2014, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees the study under subsection (a). 3143. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security programs, with respect to the management, planning, and oversight of the National Nuclear Security Administration or as affecting the delegation by the Secretary of Energy of authority to carry out such activities, as set forth under subsection (a) of such section 4102 as it existed before the amendment made by such section 3113. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2215), is amended in the matter following section 111 by inserting before a. The Commission the following: Sec. 112. Domestic medical isotope production.—. 3145. Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension (a) Extension of waste isolation pilot plant mission The Secretary of Energy shall manage WIPP in such a way as to include, in addition to the disposal of wastes authorized by section 213 of the Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 (Public Law 96–164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265), the transportation and disposal of any non-defense Federal Government-owned transuranic waste that can be shown to meet the applicable criteria described in the document entitled Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria For The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, published by the Department of Energy on April 21, 2011, or any successor document. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Disposal; transuranic waste The terms disposal and transuranic waste have the meanings given those terms in section 2 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act (Public Law 102–579; 106 Stat. 4777). (2) WIPP The term WIPP means the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant project authorized under section 213 of the Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 (Public Law 96–164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265). 3146. Conveyance of land at the Hanford Site (a) Conveyance required (1) In general Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall convey, for consideration at the estimated fair market value or, in accordance with paragraph (2), below such value, to the Community Reuse Organization of the Hanford Site (in this section referred to as the Organization) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, described in paragraph (3). (2) Consideration The Secretary may convey real property pursuant to paragraph (1) for consideration below the estimated fair market value of the real property, or without consideration, only if the Organization— (A) agrees that the net proceeds from any sale or lease of the real property (or any portion thereof) received by the Organization during at least the seven-year period beginning on the date of such conveyance will be used to support the economic redevelopment of, or related to, the Hanford Site; and (B) executes the agreement for such conveyance and accepts control of the real property within a reasonable time. (3) Real property described The real property described in this paragraph is the real property consisting of two parcels of land of approximately 1,341 acres and 300 acres, respectively, of the Hanford Reservation, as requested by the Community Reuse Organization for the Hanford Site on May 31, 2011, and October 13, 2011, and as depicted within the proposed boundaries on the map titled Attachment 2—Revised Map included in the letter sent by the Community Reuse Organization for the Hanford Site to the Department of Energy on October 13, 2011. (b) Priority consideration The Secretary shall actively solicit, and provide priority consideration to, the views of the cities and counties adjacent to the Hanford Site with respect to the development and execution of the Hanford Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 3147. Manhattan Project National Historical Park (a) Purposes The purposes of this section are— (1) to preserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the nationally significant historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project and which are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy defense environmental cleanup program under this title; (2) to improve public understanding of the Manhattan Project and the legacy of the Manhattan Project through interpretation of the historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project; (3) to enhance public access to the Historical Park consistent with protection of public safety, national security, and other aspects of the mission of the Department of Energy; and (4) to assist the Department of Energy, Historical Park communities, historical societies, and other interested organizations and individuals in efforts to preserve and protect the historically significant resources associated with the Manhattan Project. (b) Definitions In this section: (1) Historical park The term Historical Park means the Manhattan Project National Historical Park established under subsection (c). (2) Manhattan project The term Manhattan Project means the Federal military program to develop an atomic bomb ending on December 31, 1946. (3) Secretary The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior. (c) Establishment of manhattan project national historical park (1) Establishment (A) Date Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, there shall be established as a unit of the National Park System the Manhattan Project National Historical Park. (B) Areas included The Historical Park shall consist of facilities and areas listed under paragraph (2) as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy. The Secretary shall include the area referred to in paragraph (2)(C)(i), the B Reactor National Historic Landmark, in the Historical Park. (2) Eligible areas The Historical Park may only be comprised of one or more of the following areas, or portions of the areas, as generally depicted in the map titled Manhattan Project National Historical Park Sites, numbered 540/108,834–C, and dated September 2012: (A) Oak ridge, Tennessee Facilities, land, or interests in land that are— (i) at Buildings 9204–3 and 9731 at the Department of Energy Y–12 National Security Complex; (ii) at the X–10 Graphite Reactor at the Department of Energy Oak Ridge National Laboratory; (iii) at the K–25 Building site at the Department of Energy East Tennessee Technology Park; and (iv) at the former Guest House located at 210 East Madison Road. (B) Los Alamos, New Mexico Facilities, land, or interests in land that are— (i) in the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory National Historic Landmark District, or any addition to the Landmark District proposed in the National Historic Landmark Nomination—Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) NHL District (Working Draft of NHL Revision), Los Alamos National Laboratory document LA–UR 12–00387 (January 26, 2012); (ii) at the former East Cafeteria located at 1670 Nectar Street; and (iii) at the former dormitory located at 1725 17th Street. (C) Hanford, Washington Facilities, land, or interests in land on the Department of Energy Hanford Nuclear Reservation that are— (i) the B Reactor National Historic Landmark; (ii) the Hanford High School in the town of Hanford and Hanford Construction Camp Historic District; (iii) the White Bluffs Bank building in the White Bluffs Historic District; (iv) the warehouse at the Bruggemann’s Agricultural Complex; (v) the Hanford Irrigation District Pump House; and (vi) the T Plant (221–T Process Building). (3) Written consent of owner No non-Federal property may be included in the Historical Park without the written consent of the owner. (d) Agreement (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy (acting through the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Richland site offices) shall enter into an agreement governing the respective roles of the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy in administering the facilities, land, or interests in land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of Energy that is to be included in the Historical Park under subsection (c)(2), including provisions for enhanced public access, management, interpretation, and historic preservation. (2) Responsibilities of the Secretary Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary shall— (A) have decisionmaking authority for the content of historic interpretation of the Manhattan Project for purposes of administering the Historical Park; and (B) ensure that the agreement provides an appropriate advisory role for the National Park Service in preserving the historic resources covered by the agreement. (3) Responsibilities of the secretary of energy Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary of Energy— (A) shall ensure that the agreement appropriately protects public safety, national security, and other aspects of the ongoing mission of the Department of Energy at the Oak Ridge Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford Site; (B) may consult with and provide historical information to the Secretary concerning the Manhattan Project; (C) shall retain responsibility, in accordance with applicable law, for any environmental remediation that may be necessary in or around the facilities, land, or interests in land governed by the agreement; and (D) shall retain authority and legal obligations for historic preservation and general maintenance, including to ensure safe access, in connection with the Department’s Manhattan Project resources. (4) Amendments The agreement under paragraph (1) may be amended, including to add to the Historical Park facilities, land, or interests in land within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that are under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy. (e) Public participation (1) In general The Secretary shall consult with interested State, county, and local officials, organizations, and interested members of the public— (A) before executing any agreement under subsection (d); and (B) in the development of the general management plan under subsection (f)(2). (2) Notice of determination Not later than 30 days after the date on which an agreement under subsection (d) is entered into, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the establishment of the Historical Park, including an official boundary map. (3) Availability of map The official boundary map published under paragraph (2) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. The map shall be updated to reflect any additions to the Historical Park from eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2). (4) Additions Any land, interest in land, or facility within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) that is acquired by the Secretary or included in an amendment to the agreement under subsection (d)(4) shall be added to the Historical Park. (f) Administration (1) In general The Secretary shall administer the Historical Park in accordance with— (A) this section; and (B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including— (i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and (ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). (2) General management plan Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Energy, and in consultation and collaboration with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Richland Department of Energy site offices, shall complete a general management plan for the Historical Park in accordance with section 12(b) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the National Park Service General Authorities Act; 16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)). (3) Interpretive tours The Secretary may, subject to applicable law, provide interpretive tours of historically significant Manhattan Project sites and resources in the States of Tennessee, New Mexico, and Washington that are located outside the boundary of the Historical Park. (4) Land acquisition (A) In general The Secretary may acquire land and interests in land within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) by— (i) transfer of administrative jurisdiction from the Department of Energy by agreement between the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy; (ii) donation; or (iii) exchange. (B) No use of condemnation The Secretary may not acquire by condemnation any land or interest in land under this section or for the purposes of this section. (5) Donations; cooperative agreements (A) Federal facilities (i) In general The Secretary may enter into one or more agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide public access to, and management, interpretation, and historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan Project resources under the jurisdiction or control of the Federal agency. (ii) Donations; cooperative agreements The Secretary may accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements with, State governments, units of local government, tribal governments, organizations, or individuals to further the purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under clause (i) or to provide visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park. (B) Technical assistance The Secretary may provide technical assistance to State, local, or tribal governments, organizations, or individuals for the management, interpretation, and historic preservation of historically significant Manhattan Project resources not included within the Historical Park. (C) Donations to department of energy For the purposes of this section, or for the purpose of preserving and providing access to historically significant Manhattan Project resources, the Secretary of Energy may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including labor and services). (g) Clarification (1) No buffer zone created Nothing in this section, the establishment of the Historical Park, or the management plan for the Historical Park shall be construed to create buffer zones outside of the Historical Park. That an activity can be seen and heard from within the Historical Park shall not preclude the conduct of that activity or use outside the Historical Park. (2) No cause of action Nothing in this section shall constitute a cause of action with respect to activities outside or adjacent to the established boundary of the Historical Park. XXXII Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 3201. Authorization There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 $29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 3202. Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (a) Cost-benefit analysis Subsection (a) of section 315 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286d(a)) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) The Secretary may request an analysis from the Board regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final recommendation. If the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Board shall transmit to the Secretary such analysis by not later than 30 days after the date of the request. The Board shall make such analysis available to the public when the associated recommendation is made available to the public under subsection (b) or promptly thereafter. Additionally, if the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Secretary shall conduct an analysis of the costs and benefits of the recommendation and make such analysis available to the public together with the response of the Secretary to the Board under subsection (c). . (b) Recommendations Paragraph (5) of section 312(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286a(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows: (5) Recommendations The Board shall make such recommendations to the Secretary of Energy with respect to Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities, including operations of such facilities, standards, and research needs, as the Board determines are necessary to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety. In making its recommendations, the Board shall— (A) use rigorous, quantitative analysis; (B) specifically assess risk (whenever sufficient data exists); (C) specifically assess the use of various administrative, passive, and engineered controls for implementing the recommended measures; and (D) specifically assess the technical and economic feasibility of implementing the recommended measures. . XXXIV Naval Petroleum Reserves 3401. Authorization of appropriations (a) Amount There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. (b) Period of availability Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available until expended. XXXV Maritime Administration 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014 Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows: (1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of which— (A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until expended for Academy operations; and (B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until expended for capital asset management at the Academy. (2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $17,100,000, of which— (A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for student incentive payments; (B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for direct payments to such academies; and (C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy training vessels. (3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to remain available until expended. (4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $183,000,000. (5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United States Code, $72,655,000, of which $2,655,000 shall remain available until expended for administrative expenses of the program. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2015 and inserting December 31, 2020. 3503. Sense of Congress (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) It is in the interest of United States national security that the United States merchant marine, both ships and mariners, serve as a naval auxiliary in times of war or national emergency. (2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet should be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet comprised of ships with national defense features that may not be available immediately in sufficient numbers or types in the active United States-owned, United States-flagged, and United States-crewed commercial industry. (3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration, a component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, plays an important role in United States national security by providing necessary readiness and efficiency in the form of a Government-owned sealift fleet. (b) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that— (1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is critical to meeting United States national security requirements; (2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration remains capable, modern, and efficient in order to best serve the national security needs of the United States in times of war or national emergency; (3) Federal agencies must consider investment options for replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve Force to meet future operational commitments; (4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force may include— (A) construction of dual-use vessels, based on need, for use in the America’s Marine Highway Program of the Department of Transportation, as a recent study performed under a cooperative agreement between the Maritime Administration and the Navy demonstrated that dual-use vessels transporting domestic freight between United States ports could be called upon to supplement sealift capacity; (B) construction of tanker vessels to meet military transport needs; and (C) construction of vessels for use in transporting potential new energy exports; and (5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation with the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective means of recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force, including by promoting the building of new vessels that are militarily useful and commercially viable. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port of Anchorage, Alaska Section 10205 of Public Law 109–59 (119 Stat. 1934) is amended by striking shall and inserting may. 3505. Strategic seaports (a) Priority (1) In general Under the port infrastructure development program established under section 50302(c) of title 46, United States Code, the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may give priority to providing funding to strategic seaports in support of national security requirements. (2) Strategic seaport defined In this subsection the term strategic seaport means a military port or and commercial port that is subject to a port planning order or Basic Ordering Agreement (or both) that is projected to be used for the deployment of forces and shipment of ammunition or sustainment supplies in support of military operations. (b) Financial assistance Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by inserting and financial assistance, including grants, after technical assistance. D Funding Tables 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables (a) In general Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations. (b) Merit-based decisions A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— (1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and (2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. (c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. (d) Applicability to classified annex This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act. (e) Oral and written communications No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. XLI PROCUREMENT 4101. Procurement SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 001UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT19,73019,730 002AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)142,050142,050 003MQ–1 UAV518,460518,460 004RQ–11 (RAVEN)10,77210,772 ROTARY 005HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)96,227231,327 Program increase for additional aircraft[115,100] Program increase for fielding[20,000] 006AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN608,469608,469 007 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)150,931150,931 011UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)1,046,9761,046,976 012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)116,001116,001 013CH–47 HELICOPTER801,650801,650 014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)98,37698,376 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 015MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS97,78197,781 016GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)10,26210,262 017MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)12,46712,467 018AH–64 MODS53,55953,559 019CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)149,764149,764 020UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS17,50017,500 021UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS74,09574,095 022KIOWA MODS WARRIOR184,044184,044 023NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN152,569152,569 024COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE92,77992,779 025GATM ROLLUP65,61365,613 026RQ–7 UAV MODS121,902121,902 GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 027AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT47,61047,610 028SURVIVABILITY CM5,7005,700 029CMWS126,869126,869 OTHER SUPPORT 030AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT6,8096,809 031COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT65,39765,397 032AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS45,84145,841 033AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL79,69279,692 034INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES1,6151,615 035LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET2,8772,877 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY5,024,3875,159,487 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 002MSE MISSILE540,401540,401 AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 003HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY4,4644,464 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 004JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY110,510110,510 005TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY49,35449,354 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)19,96519,965 007GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)237,216237,216 008MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)19,02219,022 MODIFICATIONS 010PATRIOT MODS256,438256,438 011STINGER MODS37,25237,252 012ITAS/TOW MODS20,00020,000 013MLRS MODS11,57111,571 014HIMARS MODIFICATIONS6,1056,105 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 015SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS11,22211,222 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 016AIR DEFENSE TARGETS3,5303,530 017ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)1,7481,748 018PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT5,2855,285 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY1,334,0831,334,083 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 001STRYKER VEHICLE374,100374,100 MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 002STRYKER (MOD)20,52220,522 003FIST VEHICLE (MOD)29,96529,965 004BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)158,000158,000 005HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)4,7694,769 006PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)260,177260,177 007IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)111,031186,031 Program increase[75,000] 008ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)2,5002,500 009ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE62,95193,951 Program increase[31,000] 010M88 FOV MODS28,46928,469 011JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE2,0022,002 012M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)178,100178,100 013ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM0168,000 Program increase[168,000] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 014PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)1,5441,544 WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 015INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY69,1478,147 Funding ahead of need[–50,000] Transfer to PE 64601A per Army's request[–11,000] 018MORTAR SYSTEMS5,3105,310 019XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)24,04924,049 021CARBINE70,84648,846 Funding ahead of need[–22,000] 023COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION56,58056,580 024HANDGUN300300 MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 026M777 MODS39,30039,300 027M4 CARBINE MODS10,30010,300 028M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS33,69133,691 029M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS7,6087,608 030M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS2,7192,719 031SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS7,0177,017 032M119 MODIFICATIONS18,70718,707 033M16 RIFLE MODS2,1362,136 034MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)1,5691,569 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 035ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)2,0242,024 036PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)10,10810,108 037INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS459459 038SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)1,2671,267 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY1,597,2671,788,267 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 002CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES112,16787,167 Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction[–25,000] 003CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES58,57153,571 Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction[–5,000] 004CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES9,8589,858 005CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES80,03755,037 Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction[–25,000] 007CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES16,49616,496 008CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES69,53350,033 Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction[–19,500] 009CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES55,78155,781 MORTAR AMMUNITION 01060MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES38,02938,029 01181MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES24,65624,656 012120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES60,78160,781 TANK AMMUNITION 013CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES121,551121,551 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 014ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES39,82539,825 015ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES37,90237,902 016PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M98267,89667,896 017ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL71,20571,205 ROCKETS 020SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES1,0121,012 021ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES108,476108,476 OTHER AMMUNITION 022DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES24,07424,074 023GRENADES, ALL TYPES33,24233,242 024SIGNALS, ALL TYPES7,6097,609 025SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES5,2285,228 MISCELLANEOUS 026AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES16,70016,700 027NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES7,3667,366 028CAD/PAD ALL TYPES3,6143,614 029ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)12,42312,423 030AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT16,60416,604 031FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)14,32814,328 032CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES108108 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 033PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES242,324242,324 034CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION179,605179,605 035ARMS INITIATIVE3,4363,436 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY1,540,4371,465,937 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 001TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS4,0004,000 002SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:6,8416,841 003FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)223,910223,910 004FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP11,88011,880 005FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)14,73114,731 006PLS ESP44,25244,252 009HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV39,52539,525 011TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS51,25825,958 Funding ahead of need[–25,300] 012MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP49,90449,904 013MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS2,2002,200 NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 014HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN400400 015PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES716716 016NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER5,6195,619 COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 018WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK973,477973,477 019SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM14,12014,120 020JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY7,8697,869 021JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)5,2965,296 COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 022DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS147,212147,212 023TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS7,9987,998 024SHF TERM7,2327,232 025NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)3,3083,308 026SMART-T (SPACE)13,99213,992 028GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS28,20628,206 029MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)2,7782,778 COMM—C3 SYSTEM 031ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS)17,59017,590 COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 032ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO)786786 033JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM382,930382,930 034MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)19,20019,200 035RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)1,4381,438 036SINCGARS FAMILY9,8569,856 037AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA214,18414,184 038TRACTOR DESK6,2716,271 040SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS1,0301,030 041TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM31,86831,868 042UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE18,00018,000 044RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY1,1661,166 045FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE22,86722,867 COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 048CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE1,5121,512 049ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT61,09661,096 INFORMATION SECURITY 050TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS)13,89013,890 051INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP23,24523,245 052BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE3,8003,800 053COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)24,71124,711 COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 055BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS43,39543,395 COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 057INFORMATION SYSTEMS104,577104,577 058DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)612612 059EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM39,00039,000 060INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM248,477248,477 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 064JTT/CIBS-M824824 065PROPHET GROUND59,19859,198 067DCGS-A (MIP)267,214267,214 068JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)9,8999,899 069TROJAN (MIP)24,59824,598 070MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)1,9271,927 071CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)6,1696,169 072MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M2,9242,924 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 074LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR40,73540,735 075EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT)1313 076ENEMY UAS2,8002,800 079COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES1,2371,237 080CI MODERNIZATION1,3991,399 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 082SENTINEL MODS47,98347,983 083SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW)142142 084NIGHT VISION DEVICES202,428202,428 085LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM5,1835,183 086NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT14,07414,074 087SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF22,30022,300 089GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS)1,0161,016 090INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS55,35455,354 091ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP800800 092PROFILER3,0273,027 093MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)1,1851,185 094JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)103,214103,214 096MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)26,03726,037 097MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM23,10023,100 098COUNTERFIRE RADARS312,727312,727 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 101FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY43,22843,228 102BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM14,44614,446 103FAAD C24,6074,607 104AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS33,09033,090 105IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM21,20021,200 107LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)1,7951,795 109NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE54,32754,327 110MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)59,17159,171 111GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)83,93683,936 113LOGISTICS AUTOMATION25,47625,476 114RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET19,34119,341 ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 115ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION11,86511,865 116AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP219,431219,431 117GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM6,4146,414 118HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)62,68362,683 120RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)34,95134,951 ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 121ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V)7,4407,440 122ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)1,6151,615 ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 123PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)554554 124BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES20,00020,000 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 124ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,5583,558 CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 126FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)762762 127BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)20,63020,630 128CBRN DEFENSE22,15122,151 BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 130TACTICAL BRIDGING14,18814,188 131TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON23,10123,101 132COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP15,41615,416 ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 134GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)50,46550,465 135ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)6,4906,490 136EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION1,5631,563 137EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)20,92120,921 138REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS100100 139< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT2,2712,271 COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 140HEATERS AND ECU'S7,2697,269 141LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES200200 142SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT1,4681,468 143PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)26,52626,526 144GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM81,68071,680 Unjustified unit cost growth[–10,000] 147FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT28,09628,096 148CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM56,15056,150 149MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS3,2423,242 150FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS38,14138,141 151ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)5,8595,859 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 152DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER60,61260,612 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 153COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL22,04222,042 154MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP)35,31835,318 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 155MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS19,42719,427 156ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)3,8603,860 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 157GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)2,0002,000 159SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING36,07836,078 160MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING9,7219,721 162HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR50,12250,122 163TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED28,82828,828 164ALL TERRAIN CRANES19,86319,863 166HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE)23,46523,465 168ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP13,59013,590 169CONST EQUIP ESP16,08816,088 170ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)6,8506,850 RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 171ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP38,00719,007 Funding ahead of need[–19,000] 172ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)10,60510,605 GENERATORS 173GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP129,437129,437 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 174ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH)1,2501,250 175FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS8,2608,260 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 176COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT121,710121,710 177TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM225,200225,200 178CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER30,06330,063 179AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER34,91334,913 180GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING9,9559,955 TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 181CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT8,2418,241 182INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)67,50667,506 183TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)18,75518,755 OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 184M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR5,1105,110 185RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT5,1105,110 186PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)62,90462,904 187BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT1,4271,427 188MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)96,66196,661 189PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)2,4502,450 190SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING11,59311,593 191AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA38,9488,948 192TRACTOR YARD8,0008,000 OPA2 195INITIAL SPARES—C&E59,70059,700 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY6,465,2186,410,918 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 001EA–18G2,001,7871,956,787 Program adjustment[–45,000] 003F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET206,551206,551 004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)075,000 Program increase[75,000] 005JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV1,135,4441,135,444 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)94,76694,766 007JSF STOVL1,267,2601,267,260 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)103,195103,195 009V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)1,432,5731,432,573 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)55,19655,196 011H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)749,962749,962 012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)71,00071,000 013MH–60S (MYP)383,831383,831 014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)37,27837,278 015MH–60R (MYP)599,237599,237 016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)231,834231,834 017P–8A POSEIDON3,189,9893,189,989 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)313,160313,160 019E–2D ADV HAWKEYE997,107962,107 Unjustified CRI Funding[–35,000] 020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)266,542266,542 TRAINER AIRCRAFT 021JPATS249,080249,080 OTHER AIRCRAFT 022KC–130J134,358134,358 023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)32,28832,288 025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)52,00252,002 026MQ–8 UAV60,98060,980 028OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT14,95814,958 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 029EA–6 SERIES18,57718,577 030AEA SYSTEMS48,50248,502 031AV–8 SERIES41,57541,575 032ADVERSARY2,9922,992 033F–18 SERIES875,371875,371 034H–46 SERIES2,1272,127 036H–53 SERIES67,67567,675 037SH–60 SERIES135,054135,054 038H–1 SERIES41,70641,706 039EP–3 SERIES55,90377,903 12th Aircraft Spiral 3 Upgrade[8,000] Multi-INT Sensor Kits & Installation[14,000] 040P–3 SERIES37,43637,436 041E–2 SERIES31,04431,044 042TRAINER A/C SERIES43,72043,720 043C–2A902902 044C–130 SERIES47,58747,587 045FEWSG665665 046CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES14,58714,587 047E–6 SERIES189,312189,312 048EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES85,53785,537 049SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT3,68416,684 Engineering and Technical Services Support[8,000] Multi-INT Sensor Kits & Installation[5,000] 050T–45 SERIES98,12898,128 051POWER PLANT CHANGES22,99922,999 052JPATS SERIES1,5761,576 053AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS6,2676,267 054COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT141,685141,685 055COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES120,660120,660 056COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM3,5543,554 057ID SYSTEMS41,80041,800 058P–8 SERIES9,4859,485 059MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION14,43114,431 060MQ–8 SERIES1,0011,001 061RQ–7 SERIES26,43326,433 062V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY160,834160,834 063F–35 STOVL SERIES147,130147,130 064F–35 CV SERIES31,10031,100 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 065SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS1,142,4611,142,461 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 066COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT410,044410,044 067AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES27,45027,450 068WAR CONSUMABLES28,93028,930 069OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES5,2685,268 070SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT60,30660,306 071FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION1,7751,775 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY17,927,65117,957,651 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 001TRIDENT II MODS1,140,8651,126,765 Equipment related to New START treaty implementation[–14,100] SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 002MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES7,6177,617 STRATEGIC MISSILES 003TOMAHAWK312,456312,456 TACTICAL MISSILES 004AMRAAM95,41395,413 005SIDEWINDER117,208117,208 006JSOW136,794136,794 007STANDARD MISSILE367,985367,985 008RAM67,59667,596 009HELLFIRE33,91633,916 010STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)6,2786,278 011AERIAL TARGETS41,79941,799 012OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT3,5383,538 MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 013ESSM76,74976,749 014HARM MODS111,902111,902 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 015WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES1,1381,138 016FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON23,01423,014 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 017ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT84,31884,318 TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 018SSTD3,9783,978 019ASW TARGETS8,0318,031 MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 020MK–54 TORPEDO MODS125,898125,898 021MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS53,20353,203 022QUICKSTRIKE MINE7,8007,800 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 023TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT59,73059,730 024ASW RANGE SUPPORT4,2224,222 DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 025FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION3,9633,963 GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 026SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS12,51312,513 MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 027CIWS MODS56,30856,308 028COAST GUARD WEAPONS10,72710,727 029GUN MOUNT MODS72,90172,901 030CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS1,9431,943 031AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS19,75819,758 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 033SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS52,63252,632 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY3,122,1933,108,093 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 001GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS37,70337,703 002AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES65,41165,411 003MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION20,28420,284 004PRACTICE BOMBS37,87037,870 005CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES53,76453,764 006AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES67,19467,194 007JATOS2,7492,749 008LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE3,9063,906 0095 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION24,15124,151 010INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION33,08033,080 011OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION40,39840,398 012SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO61,21961,219 013PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION10,63710,637 014AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,5784,578 MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 015SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION26,29726,297 016LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES6,0886,088 01740 MM, ALL TYPES7,6447,644 01860MM, ALL TYPES3,3493,349 020120MM, ALL TYPES13,36113,361 022GRENADES, ALL TYPES2,1492,149 023ROCKETS, ALL TYPES27,46527,465 026FUZE, ALL TYPES26,36626,366 028AMMO MODERNIZATION8,4038,403 029ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION5,2015,201 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC589,267589,267 SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY OTHER WARSHIPS 001CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM944,866944,866 003VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE2,930,7043,422,704 Increase to Virginia class[492,000] 004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)2,354,6122,354,612 005CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS1,705,4241,705,424 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)245,793245,793 007DDG 1000231,694310,994 Increase to DDG 1000[79,300] 008DDG–511,615,5641,615,564 009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)388,551388,551 010LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP1,793,0141,793,014 AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 012AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE524,000524,000 014JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL2,7322,732 AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)183,900183,900 017OUTFITTING450,163450,163 019LCAC SLEP80,98780,987 020COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS625,800988,800 DDG–51[332,000] Joint High Speed Vessel[7,600] MTS[23,400] TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY14,077,80415,012,104 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 001LM–2500 GAS TURBINE10,18010,180 002ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE5,5365,536 003HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)16,95616,956 GENERATORS 004SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E19,78219,782 NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 005OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT39,50939,509 PERISCOPES 006SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP52,51552,515 OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 007DDG MOD285,994285,994 008FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT14,38914,389 009COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD2,4362,436 010LHA/LHD MIDLIFE12,70012,700 011LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM40,32940,329 012POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT19,60319,603 013SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT8,6788,678 014VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT74,20974,209 015LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT47,07847,078 016SUBMARINE BATTERIES37,00037,000 017LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT25,05325,053 018STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP12,98612,986 019DSSP EQUIPMENT2,4552,455 020CG MODERNIZATION10,53910,539 021LCAC14,43114,431 022UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS36,70036,700 023ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION119,902119,902 024CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS3,6783,678 025SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM8,2928,292 REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 027REACTOR COMPONENTS286,744286,744 OCEAN ENGINEERING 028DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT8,7808,780 SMALL BOATS 029STANDARD BOATS36,45236,452 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 030OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT36,14536,145 PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 031OPERATING FORCES IPE69,36869,368 OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 032NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS106,328106,328 033LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT45,96645,966 034LCS MCM MISSION MODULES59,88559,885 035LCS SUW MISSION MODULES37,16837,168 LOGISTIC SUPPORT 036LSD MIDLIFE77,97477,974 SHIP SONARS 038SPQ–9B RADAR27,93427,934 039AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM83,23183,231 040SSN ACOUSTICS199,438199,438 041UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT9,3949,394 042SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS12,95312,953 043ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC8,9588,958 ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 044SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM24,07724,077 045SSTD11,92511,925 046FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM94,33894,338 047SURTASS9,6809,680 048MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE18,13018,130 ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 049AN/SLQ–32203,375203,375 RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 050SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT123,656123,656 051AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)896896 SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 052SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG49,47549,475 OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 053COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY34,69234,692 054TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)396396 055NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)15,70315,703 056ATDLS3,8363,836 057NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)7,2017,201 058MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT54,40054,400 059SHALLOW WATER MCM8,5488,548 060NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)11,76511,765 061AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE6,4836,483 062STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP7,6317,631 TRAINING EQUIPMENT 063OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT53,64453,644 AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 064MATCALS7,4617,461 065SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL9,1409,140 066AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM20,79820,798 067NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM19,75419,754 068FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS8,9098,909 069LANDING SYSTEMS13,55413,554 070ID SYSTEMS38,93438,934 071NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS14,13114,131 OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 072DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL3,2493,249 073MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM11,64611,646 074TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS18,18918,189 075DCGS-N17,35017,350 076CANES340,567340,567 077RADIAC9,8359,835 078CANES-INTELL59,65259,652 079GPETE6,2536,253 080INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY4,9634,963 081EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION4,6644,664 082ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION66,88966,889 SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 084SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION23,87723,877 086COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M28,00128,001 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 087SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT7,8567,856 088SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT74,37674,376 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 089SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS27,38127,381 090NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)215,952215,952 SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 091JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT4,4634,463 092ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS778778 CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 094INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)133,530133,530 095MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM1,0001,000 CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 096CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP12,25112,251 OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 097COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT2,8932,893 SONOBUOYS 099SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES179,927179,927 AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 100WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT55,27955,279 101EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS8,7928,792 102AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT11,36411,364 103AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT59,50259,502 104METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT19,11819,118 105DCRS/DPL1,4251,425 106AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT29,67029,670 107AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES101,554101,554 108LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT18,29318,293 109PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS7,9697,969 110OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT5,2155,215 111AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS)4,8274,827 SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 112NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM1,1881,188 113GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT4,4474,447 SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 114NATO SEASPARROW58,36858,368 115RAM GMLS491491 116SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM51,85851,858 117AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT59,75759,757 118TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT71,55971,559 119VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS626626 120MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS2,7792,779 FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 121STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP224,484198,565 New START treaty implementation[–25,919] ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 122SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS85,67885,678 123SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,9133,913 124SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,9093,909 125ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT28,69428,694 OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 126EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP46,58646,586 127ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,93311,933 OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 128ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM62,36162,361 129SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS41,81341,813 130SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS26,67226,672 CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 131PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES5,6005,600 132GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS3,7173,717 133CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP10,88110,881 134FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT14,74814,748 135TACTICAL VEHICLES5,5405,540 136AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT5,7415,741 137POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT3,8523,852 138ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION25,75725,757 139PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES1,1821,182 SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 140MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT14,25014,250 141OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT6,4016,401 142FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION5,7185,718 143SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS22,59722,597 TRAINING DEVICES 144TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT22,52722,527 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 145COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT50,42850,428 146EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,2922,292 147MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT4,9254,925 149NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,2023,202 151OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT24,29424,294 152C4ISR EQUIPMENT4,2874,287 153ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT18,27618,276 154PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT134,495134,495 155ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY324,327324,327 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 156ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS12,14012,140 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 157SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS317,234316,959 New START treaty implementation[–275] TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY6,310,2576,284,063 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 001AAV7A1 PIP32,36032,360 002LAV PIP6,0036,003 ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 003EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM589589 004155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER3,6553,655 005HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM5,4675,467 006WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION20,35420,354 OTHER SUPPORT 007MODIFICATION KITS38,44638,446 008WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM4,7344,734 GUIDED MISSILES 009GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE15,71315,713 010JAVELIN36,17536,175 012ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)1,1361,136 OTHER SUPPORT 013MODIFICATION KITS33,97633,976 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 014UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER16,27316,273 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 015REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT41,06341,063 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 016COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM2,9302,930 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 018ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)1,6371,637 019AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS18,39418,394 RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 020RADAR SYSTEMS114,051114,051 021RQ–21 UAS66,61266,612 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 022FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM3,7493,749 023INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT75,97975,979 026RQ–11 UAV1,6531,653 027DCGS-MC9,4949,494 OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 028NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT6,1716,171 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 029COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES121,955121,955 030COMMAND POST SYSTEMS83,29483,294 031RADIO SYSTEMS74,71874,718 032COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS47,61347,613 033COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT19,57319,573 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 033ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS5,6595,659 ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 034COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES1,0391,039 035COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES31,05031,050 TACTICAL VEHICLES 0365/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)36,33336,333 037MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS3,1373,137 040FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS27,38527,385 OTHER SUPPORT 041ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION7,0167,016 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 042ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT14,37714,377 043BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT24,86424,864 044TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS21,59221,592 045POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED61,35361,353 046AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT4,8274,827 047EOD SYSTEMS40,01140,011 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 048PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT16,80916,809 049GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)3,4083,408 050MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP48,54948,549 051FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION190190 GENERAL PROPERTY 052FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT23,12923,129 053TRAINING DEVICES8,3468,346 054CONTAINER FAMILY1,8571,857 055FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT36,19836,198 056RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN2,3902,390 OTHER SUPPORT 057ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION6,5256,525 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 058SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS13,70013,700 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS1,343,5111,343,511 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 001F–353,060,7703,060,770 002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)363,783363,783 OTHER AIRLIFT 005C–130J537,517537,517 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)162,000162,000 007HC–130J132,121132,121 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)88,00088,000 009MC–130J389,434389,434 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)104,000104,000 HELICOPTERS 015CV–22 (MYP)230,798230,798 MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 017CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C2,5412,541 OTHER AIRCRAFT 020TARGET DRONES138,669138,669 022AC–130J470,019470,019 024RQ–427,00027,000 027MQ–9272,217352,217 Program increase[80,000] 028RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC1,7471,747 STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 029B–2A20,01920,019 030B–1B132,222132,222 031B–52111,002110,502 B–52 conversions related to New START treaty implementation[–500] 032LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES27,19727,197 TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 033A–1047,59847,598 034F–15354,624354,624 035F–1611,79411,794 036F–22A285,830285,830 037F–35 MODIFICATIONS157,777157,777 AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 038C–52,4562,456 039C–5M1,021,9671,021,967 042C–17A143,197143,197 043C–21103103 044C–32A9,7809,780 045C–37A452452 046C–130 AMP047,300 LRIP Kit Procurement[47,300] TRAINER AIRCRAFT 047GLIDER MODS128128 048T–66,4276,427 049T–1277277 050T–3828,68628,686 OTHER AIRCRAFT 052U–2 MODS45,59145,591 053KC–10A (ATCA)70,91870,918 054C–121,8761,876 055MC–12W5,0005,000 056C–20 MODS192192 057VC–25A MOD263263 058C–406,1196,119 059C–13058,57774,277 C–130H Propulsion System Engine Upgrades[15,700] 061C–130J MODS10,47510,475 062C–13546,55646,556 063COMPASS CALL MODS34,49434,494 064RC–135171,813171,813 065E–3197,087197,087 066E–414,30414,304 067E–857,47257,472 068H–16,6276,627 069H–6027,65427,654 070RQ–4 MODS9,3139,313 071HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS16,30016,300 072OTHER AIRCRAFT6,9486,948 073MQ–1 MODS9,7349,734 074MQ–9 MODS102,970102,970 076RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS30,00030,000 077CV–22 MODS23,31023,310 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 078INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS463,285639,285 F100–229 spare engine shortfall[165,000] MQ–9 spares[11,000] COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 079AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP49,14049,140 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 081B–13,6833,683 083B–2A43,78643,786 084B–527,0007,000 087C–17A81,95281,952 089C–1358,5978,597 090F–152,4032,403 091F–163,4553,455 092F–22A5,9115,911 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 094INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS21,14821,148 WAR CONSUMABLES 095WAR CONSUMABLES94,94794,947 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 096OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES1,242,0041,242,004 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 101ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS75,84567,545 Program Decrease[–8,300] TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE11,398,90111,709,101 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 001MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC39,10439,104 TACTICAL 002JASSM291,151291,151 003SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)119,904119,904 004AMRAAM340,015340,015 005PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE48,54848,548 006SMALL DIAMETER BOMB42,34742,347 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 007INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION752752 CLASS IV 009MM III MODIFICATIONS21,63521,635 010AGM–65D MAVERICK276276 011AGM–88A HARM580580 012AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)6,8886,888 013SMALL DIAMETER BOMB5,0005,000 MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 014INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS72,08071,377 Spares and repair parts related to New START treaty implementation[–703] SPACE PROGRAMS 015ADVANCED EHF379,586379,586 016WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)38,39838,398 017GPS III SPACE SEGMENT403,431403,431 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)74,16774,167 019SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)5,2445,244 020GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)55,99755,997 021DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)95,67395,673 022EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)1,852,9001,852,900 023SBIR HIGH (SPACE)583,192583,192 SPECIAL PROGRAMS 029SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS36,71636,716 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 029ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS829,702829,702 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE5,343,2865,342,583 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 001ROCKETS15,73515,735 CARTRIDGES 002CARTRIDGES129,921129,921 BOMBS 003PRACTICE BOMBS30,84030,840 004GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS187,397187,397 005JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION188,510188,510 OTHER ITEMS 006CAD/PAD35,83735,837 007EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)7,5317,531 008SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS499499 009MODIFICATIONS480480 010ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION9,7659,765 FLARES 011FLARES55,86455,864 FUZES 013FUZES76,03776,037 SMALL ARMS 014SMALL ARMS21,02621,026 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE759,442759,442 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 001PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES2,0482,048 CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 002MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE8,0198,019 003CAP VEHICLES946946 004ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION7,1387,138 SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 005SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES13,09313,093 006ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION13,98313,983 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 007FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES23,79423,794 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 008ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION8,6698,669 BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 009RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP6,1446,144 010ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION1,5801,580 COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 012COMSEC EQUIPMENT149,661149,661 013MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)726726 INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 014INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT2,7892,789 015INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT31,87531,875 016ADVANCE TECH SENSORS452452 017MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS14,20314,203 ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 018AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS46,23246,232 019NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM11,68511,685 020BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED19,24819,248 021THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS19,29219,292 022WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST17,16617,166 023STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL22,72322,723 024CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX27,93027,930 025TAC SIGNIT SPT217217 SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 027GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY49,62749,627 028AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS13,55913,559 029MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL11,18611,186 030AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM43,23843,238 031COMBAT TRAINING RANGES10,43110,431 032C3 COUNTERMEASURES13,76913,769 033GCSS-AF FOS19,13819,138 034THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM8,8098,809 035AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS26,93526,935 AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 036INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS80,55880,558 038AFNET97,58897,588 039VOICE SYSTEMS8,4198,419 040USCENTCOM34,27634,276 SPACE PROGRAMS 041SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE28,23528,235 042NAVSTAR GPS SPACE2,0612,061 043NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE4,4154,415 044AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE30,23730,237 045SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE98,06298,062 046MILSATCOM SPACE105,935105,935 047SPACE MODS SPACE37,86137,861 048COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM7,1717,171 ORGANIZATION AND BASE 049TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT83,53783,537 050COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER11,88411,884 051RADIO EQUIPMENT14,71114,711 052CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT10,27510,275 053BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE50,90750,907 MODIFICATIONS 054COMM ELECT MODS55,70155,701 PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 055NIGHT VISION GOGGLES14,52414,524 056ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION28,65528,655 DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 057MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP9,3329,332 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 058BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT16,76216,762 059CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS33,76833,768 060PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT2,4952,495 061MOBILITY EQUIPMENT12,85912,859 062ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION1,9541,954 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 064DARP RC13524,52824,528 065DCGS-AF137,819137,819 067SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM479,586479,586 068DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.45,15945,159 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 068ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS14,519,25614,519,256 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 069SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS25,74625,746 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE16,760,58116,760,581 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 038MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD37,34537,345 039MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE16,67816,678 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 037INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)14,36314,363 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 041MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS35,25935,259 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 008INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY16,18916,189 011TELEPORT PROGRAM66,07566,075 012ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION83,88183,881 013NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)2,5722,572 014DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK125,557125,557 016CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE16,94116,941 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 017MAJOR EQUIPMENT13,13713,137 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 021MAJOR EQUIPMENT5,0205,020 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 001ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION1,2911,291 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 040MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS14,79214,792 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 025THAAD581,005581,005 026AEGIS BMD580,814580,814 027BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS62,00062,000 028AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III131,400131,400 030IRON DOME220,309220,309 031GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM (GMD)00 032 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY)0107,000 Advanced Procurement of 14 GBIs, beginning with booster motor sets[107,000] MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 003PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION47,20147,201 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 022VEHICLES100100 023OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT13,39513,395 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 020EQUIPMENT978978 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 019AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS1,4541,454 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 002MAJOR EQUIPMENT5,7115,711 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 018MAJOR EQUIPMENT15,41415,414 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 041ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS544,272544,272 AVIATION PROGRAMS 043ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT112,456112,456 044MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM81,45781,457 045NON-STANDARD AVIATION2,6502,650 046U–2856,20856,208 047MH–47 CHINOOK19,76619,766 048RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE850850 049CV–22 MODIFICATION98,92798,927 050MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE20,57620,576 051MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE1,8931,893 053STUASL013,16613,166 054PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE107,687107,687 055AC/MC–130J51,87051,870 057C–130 MODIFICATIONS71,94071,940 SHIPBUILDING 059UNDERWATER SYSTEMS37,43937,439 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 061ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M159,029159,029 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 064INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS79,81979,819 066DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS14,90614,906 068OTHER ITEMS <$5M81,71181,711 069COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS35,05335,053 072SPECIAL PROGRAMS41,52641,526 073TACTICAL VEHICLES43,35343,353 074WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M210,540210,540 076COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS20,00020,000 080GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES6,6456,645 081OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE25,58125,581 087OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS191,061191,061 CBDP 089INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION14,27114,271 090INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION101,667101,667 092JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL)13,44713,447 093COLLECTIVE PROTECTION20,89620,896 094CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE144,540144,540 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE4,534,0834,641,083 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 001JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND98,8000 Program reduction[–98,800] TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND98,8000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT98,227,16899,666,171 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 001ASATURN ARCH (MIP)48,00048,000 003MQ–1 UAV31,98831,988 ROTARY 008AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD142,000142,000 010KIOWA WARRIOR WRA163,800163,800 013CH–47 HELICOPTER386,000386,000 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY771,788771,788 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 002MSE MISSILE025,887 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[25,887] AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 003HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY54,00054,000 ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 007GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)39,04539,045 009AARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM35,60035,600 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY128,645154,532 PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 033M16 RIFLE MODS015,422 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[15,422] TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY015,422 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 002CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES4,4004,400 004CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES1,5001,500 005CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES5,00010,000 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[5,000] 008CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES60,00060,000 MORTAR AMMUNITION 01060MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES5,0005,000 ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 014ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES10,00030,000 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[20,000] 015ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES10,00010,000 016PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M98211,00011,000 MINES 018MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES09,482 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[9,482] ROCKETS 021ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES57,00057,000 OTHER AMMUNITION 022DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES4,0004,000 023GRENADES, ALL TYPES3,0003,000 024SIGNALS, ALL TYPES8,0008,000 MISCELLANEOUS 028CAD/PAD ALL TYPES2,0002,000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY180,900215,382 OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 003FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)02,500 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[2,500] 005FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)02,050 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[2,050] 013MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS321,040562,596 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[241,556] COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 060INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM25,00025,000 ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 067DCGS-A (MIP)7,2007,200 071CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)5,9805,980 ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 074LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR57,80083,255 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[25,455] 078FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE15,30015,300 079COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES4,2214,221 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 091ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP1,8341,834 093MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)08,400 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[8,400] 096MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)21,00021,000 098COUNTERFIRE RADARS85,83085,830 ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 110MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)03,200 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[3,200] 112SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE)05,160 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[5,160] CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 126FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)015,000 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[15,000] 127BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)024,932 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[24,932] ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 137EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)03,565 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[3,565] COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 146FORCE PROVIDER51,65451,654 147FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT6,2646,264 PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 152DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER02,119 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[2,119] TRAINING EQUIPMENT 176COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT07,000 Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming[7,000] TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY603,123944,060 JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND NETWORK ATTACK 001ATTACK THE NETWORK417,700417,700 JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 002DEFEAT THE DEVICE248,886248,886 FORCE TRAINING 003TRAIN THE FORCE106,000106,000 STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 004OPERATIONS227,414227,414 TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND1,000,0001,000,000 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 011H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)29,52029,520 OTHER AIRCRAFT 026MQ–8 UAV13,10013,100 MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 031AV–8 SERIES57,65257,652 033F–18 SERIES35,50035,500 039EP–3 SERIES2,7002,700 049SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT3,3753,375 054COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT49,18349,183 055COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES4,1904,190 059MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION20,70020,700 AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 065SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS24,77624,776 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY240,696240,696 WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TACTICAL MISSILES 009HELLFIRE27,00027,000 009ALASER MAVERICK58,00058,000 010STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)1,5001,500 TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY86,50086,500 PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 001GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS11,42411,424 002AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES30,33230,332 003MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION8,2828,282 006AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES31,88431,884 011OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION409409 012SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO11,97611,976 013PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION2,4472,447 014AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION7,6927,692 MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 015SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION13,46113,461 016LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES3,3103,310 01740 MM, ALL TYPES6,2446,244 01860MM, ALL TYPES3,3683,368 01981MM, ALL TYPES9,1629,162 020120MM, ALL TYPES10,26610,266 021CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES1,8871,887 022GRENADES, ALL TYPES1,6111,611 023ROCKETS, ALL TYPES37,45937,459 024ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES970970 025DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES418418 026FUZE, ALL TYPES14,21914,219 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC206,821206,821 OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 135TACTICAL VEHICLES17,96817,968 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY17,96817,968 PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS GUIDED MISSILES 010JAVELIN29,33429,334 011FOLLOW ON TO SMAW105105 OTHER SUPPORT 013MODIFICATION KITS16,08116,081 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 015REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT16,08116,081 OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 017MODIFICATION KITS2,8312,831 COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 018ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)8,1708,170 INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 023INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,7002,700 026RQ–11 UAV2,8302,830 OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 029COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES4,8664,866 030COMMAND POST SYSTEMS265265 ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 042ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT114114 043BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT523523 044TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS365365 045POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED2,0042,004 047EOD SYSTEMS42,93042,930 GENERAL PROPERTY 055FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT385385 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS129,584129,584 AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 032LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES94,05094,050 OTHER AIRCRAFT 052U–2 MODS11,30011,300 059C–1301,6181,618 064RC–1352,7002,700 COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 079AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP6,0006,000 TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE115,668115,668 MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 005PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE24,20024,200 TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE24,20024,200 PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 001ROCKETS326326 CARTRIDGES 002CARTRIDGES17,63417,634 BOMBS 004GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS37,51437,514 005JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION84,45984,459 FLARES 011FLARES14,97314,973 012FUZES3,8593,859 SMALL ARMS 014SMALL ARMS1,2001,200 TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE159,965159,965 OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 022WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST1,8001,800 SPACE PROGRAMS 046MILSATCOM SPACE5,6955,695 BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 059CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS60,60060,600 061MOBILITY EQUIPMENT68,00068,000 SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 068DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.58,25058,250 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 068ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS2,380,5012,380,501 TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE2,574,8462,574,846 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 011TELEPORT PROGRAM4,7604,760 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 041ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS78,98678,986 AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 060ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT2,8412,841 OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 064INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS13,30013,300 082SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS8,0348,034 087OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS3,3543,354 TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE111,275111,275 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 001JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND15,0000 Program reduction[–15,000] TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND15,0000 NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT UNDISTRIBUTED 999MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT0400,000 Program increase[400,000] TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT0400,000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT6,366,9797,168,707 XLII RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) LineProgramElementItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 0010601101AIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH21,80321,803 0020601102ADEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES221,901221,901 0030601103AUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES79,35979,359 0040601104AUNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS113,662113,662 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH436,725436,725 APPLIED RESEARCH 0050602105AMATERIALS TECHNOLOGY26,58526,585 0060602120ASENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY43,17043,170 0070602122ATRACTOR HIP36,29336,293 0080602211AAVIATION TECHNOLOGY55,61555,615 0090602270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY17,58517,585 0100602303AMISSILE TECHNOLOGY51,52851,528 0110602307AADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY26,16226,162 0120602308AADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION24,06324,063 0130602601ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY64,58964,589 0140602618ABALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY68,30068,300 0150602622ACHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY4,4904,490 0160602623AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM7,8187,818 0170602624AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY37,79837,798 0180602705AELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES59,02159,021 0190602709ANIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY43,42643,426 0200602712ACOUNTERMINE SYSTEMS20,57420,574 0210602716AHUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY21,33921,339 0220602720AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY20,31620,316 0230602782ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY34,20934,209 0240602783ACOMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY10,43910,439 0250602784AMILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY70,06470,064 0260602785AMANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY17,65417,654 0270602786AWARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY31,54631,546 0280602787AMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY93,34093,340 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH885,924885,924 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0290603001AWARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY56,05656,056 0300603002AMEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY62,03262,032 0310603003AAVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY81,08081,080 0320603004AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY63,91963,919 0330603005ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY97,04397,043 0340603006ASPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY5,8665,866 0350603007AMANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY7,8007,800 0360603008AELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY40,41640,416 0370603009ATRACTOR HIKE9,1669,166 0380603015ANEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS13,62713,627 0390603020ATRACTOR ROSE10,66710,667 0410603125ACOMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT15,05415,054 0420603130ATRACTOR NAIL3,1943,194 0430603131ATRACTOR EGGS2,3672,367 0440603270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY25,34825,348 0450603313AMISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY64,00964,009 0460603322ATRACTOR CAGE11,08311,083 0470603461AHIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM180,662180,662 0480603606ALANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY22,80622,806 0490603607AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM5,0305,030 0500603710ANIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY36,40736,407 0510603728AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS11,74511,745 0520603734AMILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY23,71723,717 0530603772AADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY33,01233,012 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT882,106882,106 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0540603305AARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION15,30115,301 0550603308AARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION13,59213,592 0560603619ALANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV10,62510,625 0580603639ATANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION30,61230,612 0590603653AADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS)49,98949,989 0600603747ASOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY6,7036,703 0610603766ATACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV6,8946,894 0620603774ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT9,0669,066 0630603779AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL2,6332,633 0640603782AWARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL272,384272,384 0650603790ANATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT3,8743,874 0660603801AAVIATION—ADV DEV5,0185,018 0670603804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV11,55611,556 0690603807AMEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV15,60315,603 0700603827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT14,15914,159 0710603850AINTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE7979 0720604115ATECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES55,60555,605 0740604319AINDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)79,23279,232 0750604785AINTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4)4,4764,476 0760305205AENDURANCE UAVS28,991991 LEMV program reduction[–28,000] SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES636,392608,392 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0770604201AAIRCRAFT AVIONICS76,58876,588 0780604220AARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS73,30973,309 0790604270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT154,621154,621 0800604280AJOINT TACTICAL RADIO31,82631,826 0810604290AMID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)23,34123,341 0820604321AALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM4,8394,839 0830604328ATRACTOR CAGE23,84123,841 0840604601AINFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS79,85590,855 Transfer from WTCV line 15—XM25 development[11,000] 0850604604AMEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES2,1402,140 0860604611AJAVELIN5,0025,002 0870604622AFAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES21,32121,321 0880604633AAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL514514 0930604710ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV43,40543,405 0940604713ACOMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT1,9391,939 0950604715ANON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV18,98018,980 0970604741AAIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV18,29418,294 0980604742ACONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT17,01317,013 0990604746AAUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT6,7016,701 1000604760ADISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV14,57514,575 1010604780ACOMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE27,63427,634 1020604798ABRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION193,748193,748 1030604802AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV15,72115,721 1040604804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV41,70341,703 1050604805ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV7,3797,379 1060604807AMEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV39,46839,468 1070604808ALANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV92,28592,285 1080604814AARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD8,2098,209 1090604818AARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE22,95822,958 1100604820ARADAR DEVELOPMENT1,5491,549 1110604822AGENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS)17,34217,342 1120604823AFIREFINDER47,22147,221 1130604827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL48,47748,477 1140604854AARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD80,61380,613 1170605013AINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT68,81468,814 1180605018AINTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)137,290137,290 1190605028AARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)116,298116,298 1200605030AJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)68,14868,148 1210605380AAMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)33,21933,219 1220605450AJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)15,12715,127 1240605456APAC–3/MSE MISSILE68,84368,843 1250605457AARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)364,649364,649 1260605625AMANNED GROUND VEHICLE592,201592,201 1270605626AAERIAL COMMON SENSOR10,38210,382 1280605766ANATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)21,14321,143 1290605812AJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH84,23084,230 1300303032ATROJAN—RH123,4653,465 1310304270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT10,80610,806 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION2,857,0262,868,026 RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1320604256ATHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT16,93416,934 1330604258ATARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT13,48813,488 1340604759AMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT46,67246,672 1350605103ARAND ARROYO CENTER11,91911,919 1360605301AARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL193,658193,658 1370605326ACONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM37,15837,158 1390605601AARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES340,659340,659 1400605602AARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS66,06166,061 1410605604ASURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS43,28043,280 1430605606AAIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION6,0256,025 1440605702AMETEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES7,3497,349 1450605706AMATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS19,80919,809 1460605709AEXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS5,9415,941 1470605712ASUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING55,50455,504 1480605716AARMY EVALUATION CENTER65,27465,274 1490605718AARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG1,2831,283 1500605801APROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES82,03582,035 1510605803ATECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES33,85333,853 1520605805AMUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY53,34053,340 1530605857AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT5,1935,193 1540605898AMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D54,17554,175 SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,159,6101,159,610 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1560603778AMLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM110,576110,576 1570607141ALOGISTICS AUTOMATION3,7173,717 1590607865APATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT70,05370,053 1600102419AAEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE98,45068,450 JLENS program reduction[–30,000] 1610203726AADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM30,94030,940 1620203735ACOMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS177,532177,532 1630203740AMANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM36,49536,495 1640203744AAIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS257,187257,187 1650203752AAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM315315 1660203758ADIGITIZATION6,1866,186 1670203801AMISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM1,5781,578 1680203802AOTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS62,10062,100 1690203808ATRACTOR CARD18,77818,778 1700208053AJOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM7,1087,108 1730303028ASECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES7,6007,600 1740303140AINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM9,3579,357 1750303141AGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM41,22541,225 1760303142ASATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)18,19718,197 1770303150AWWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM14,21514,215 1790305204ATACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES33,53333,533 1800305208ADISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS27,62227,622 1810305219AMQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS10,90110,901 1820305232ARQ–11 UAV2,3212,321 1830305233ARQ–7 UAV12,03112,031 1850307665ABIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE12,44912,449 1860708045AEND ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES56,13656,136 186A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS4,7174,717 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT1,131,3191,101,319 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY7,989,1027,942,102 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 0010601103NUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES112,617122,617 Program increase[10,000] 0020601152NIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH18,23018,230 0030601153NDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES484,459484,459 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH615,306625,306 APPLIED RESEARCH 0040602114NPOWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH104,513104,513 0050602123NFORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH145,307145,307 0060602131MMARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY47,33447,334 0070602235NCOMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH34,16334,163 0080602236NWARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH49,68949,689 0090602271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH97,70197,701 0100602435NOCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH45,68563,685 AGOR mid life refit[18,000] 0110602651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH6,0606,060 0120602747NUNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH103,050103,050 0130602750NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH169,710169,710 0140602782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH31,32631,326 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH834,538852,538 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0150603114NPOWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY48,20148,201 0160603123NFORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY28,32828,328 0190603271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY56,17956,179 0200603640MUSMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)132,400132,400 0210603651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT11,85411,854 0220603673NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT247,931247,931 0230603729NWARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY4,7604,760 0250603758NNAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS51,46351,463 0260603782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY2,0002,000 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT583,116583,116 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0270603207NAIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS42,24642,246 0280603216NAVIATION SURVIVABILITY5,5915,591 0290603237NDEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL3,2623,262 0300603251NAIRCRAFT SYSTEMS7474 0310603254NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT7,9647,964 0320603261NTACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE5,2575,257 0330603382NADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY1,5701,570 0340603502NSURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES168,040168,040 0350603506NSURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE88,64988,649 0360603512NCARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT83,90283,902 0370603525NPILOT FISH108,713108,713 0380603527NRETRACT LARCH9,3169,316 0390603536NRETRACT JUNIPER77,10877,108 0400603542NRADIOLOGICAL CONTROL762762 0410603553NSURFACE ASW2,3492,349 0420603561NADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT852,977874,977 Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Development[22,000] 0430603562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS8,7648,764 0440603563NSHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN20,50120,501 0450603564NSHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES27,05227,052 0460603570NADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS428,933428,933 0470603573NADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS27,15427,154 0480603576NCHALK EAGLE519,140519,140 0490603581NLITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)406,389406,389 0500603582NCOMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION36,57036,570 0510603609NCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS8,4048,404 0520603611MMARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES136,967136,967 0530603635MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM1,4891,489 0540603654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT38,42238,422 0550603658NCOOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT69,31269,312 0560603713NOCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT9,1969,196 0570603721NENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION18,85018,850 0580603724NNAVY ENERGY PROGRAM45,61845,618 0590603725NFACILITIES IMPROVEMENT3,0193,019 0600603734NCHALK CORAL144,951144,951 0610603739NNAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY5,7975,797 0620603746NRETRACT MAPLE308,131308,131 0630603748NLINK PLUMERIA195,189195,189 0640603751NRETRACT ELM56,35856,358 0650603764NLINK EVERGREEN55,37855,378 0660603787NSPECIAL PROCESSES48,84248,842 0670603790NNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT7,5097,509 0680603795NLAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY5,0755,075 0690603851MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING51,17851,178 0700603860NJOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL205,615205,615 0720604272NTACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)37,22737,227 0730604279NASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION169169 0740604653NJOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)20,87410,874 Schedule delay[–10,000] 0750604659NPRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM2,2572,257 0760604707NSPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT38,32738,327 0770604786NOFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT135,985135,985 0780605812MJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH50,36250,362 0790303354NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP8,4488,448 0800304270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP153153 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES4,641,3854,653,385 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0810604212NOTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT40,55840,558 0820604214NAV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV35,82535,825 0830604215NSTANDARDS DEVELOPMENT99,89199,891 0840604216NMULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT17,56517,565 0850604218NAIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING4,0264,026 0860604221NP–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,7911,791 0870604230NWARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM11,72511,725 0880604231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM68,46368,463 0890604234NADVANCED HAWKEYE152,041152,041 0900604245NH–1 UPGRADES47,12347,123 0910604261NACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS30,20830,208 0920604262NV–22A43,08443,084 0930604264NAIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT11,40111,401 0940604269NEA–1811,13811,138 0950604270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT34,96434,964 0960604273NVH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT94,23894,238 0970604274NNEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)257,796257,796 0980604280NJOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)3,3023,302 0990604307NSURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING240,298240,298 1000604311NLPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION1,2141,214 1010604329NSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)46,00746,007 1020604366NSTANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS75,59275,592 1030604373NAIRBORNE MCM117,854117,854 1040604376MMARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION10,08010,080 1050604378NNAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING21,41321,413 1060604404NUNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM146,683146,683 1070604501NADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS275,871275,871 1080604503NSSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION89,67289,672 1090604504NAIR CONTROL13,75413,754 1100604512NSHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS69,61569,615 1120604558NNEW DESIGN SSN121,566121,566 1130604562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM49,14349,143 1140604567NSHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E155,254155,254 1150604574NNAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES3,6893,689 1160604601NMINE DEVELOPMENT5,0415,041 1170604610NLIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT26,44426,444 1180604654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT8,8978,897 1190604703NPERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS6,2336,233 1200604727NJOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS442442 1210604755NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)130,360130,360 1220604756NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)50,20950,209 1230604757NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)164,799164,799 1240604761NINTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING1,9841,984 1250604771NMEDICAL DEVELOPMENT9,4589,458 1260604777NNAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM51,43051,430 1270604800MJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD512,631512,631 1280604800NJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD534,187534,187 1290605013MINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT5,5645,564 1300605013NINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT69,65969,659 1320605212NCH–53K RDTE503,180503,180 1330605450NJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)5,5005,500 1340605500NMULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)317,358317,358 1350204202NDDG–1000187,910187,910 1360304231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP2,1402,140 1370304785NTACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS9,4069,406 1380305124NSPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM22,80022,800 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION5,028,4765,028,476 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1390604256NTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT43,26143,261 1400604258NTARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT71,87271,872 1410604759NMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT38,03338,033 1420605126NJOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION1,3521,352 1430605152NSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY5,5665,566 1440605154NCENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES48,34548,345 1460605804NTECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES637637 1470605853NMANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT76,58576,585 1480605856NSTRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT3,2213,221 1490605861NRDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT72,72572,725 1500605863NRDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT141,778141,778 1510605864NTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT331,219331,219 1520605865NOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY16,56516,565 1530605866NNAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT3,2653,265 1540605867NSEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT7,1347,134 1550605873MMARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT24,08224,082 1560305885NTACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES497497 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT886,137886,137 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1590604227NHARPOON MODIFICATIONS699699 1600604402NUNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT20,96140,961 X–47B Aerial Refueling Test & Evaluation[20,000] 1620604766MMARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS3535 1630605525NCARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON2,4602,460 1640605555NSTRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT9,7579,757 1650101221NSTRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT98,057121,957 Reentry System Applications and Strategic Guidance Applications[23,900] 1660101224NSSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM31,76831,768 1670101226NSUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT1,4641,464 1680101402NNAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS21,72921,729 1690203761NRAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)13,56113,561 1700204136NF/A–18 SQUADRONS131,118131,118 1710204152NE–2 SQUADRONS1,9711,971 1720204163NFLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)46,15546,155 1730204228NSURFACE SUPPORT2,3742,374 1740204229NTOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)12,40712,407 1750204311NINTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM41,60941,609 1760204413NAMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)7,2407,240 1770204460MGROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)78,20878,208 1780204571NCONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT45,12445,124 1790204574NCRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT2,7032,703 1800204575NELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT19,56319,563 1810205601NHARM IMPROVEMENT13,58613,586 1820205604NTACTICAL DATA LINKS197,538197,538 1830205620NSURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION31,86331,863 1840205632NMK–48 ADCAP12,80612,806 1850205633NAVIATION IMPROVEMENTS88,60788,607 1870205675NOPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS116,928116,928 1880206313MMARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS178,753178,753 1890206623MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS139,594113,794 Marine personnel carrier—funding ahead of need[–20,800] Precision extended range munition program reduction[–5,000] 1900206624MMARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT42,64742,647 1910206625MUSMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)34,39434,394 1920207161NTACTICAL AIM MISSILES39,15939,159 1930207163NADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)2,6132,613 1940208058NJOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV)986986 1990303109NSATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)66,23166,231 2000303138NCONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)24,47624,476 2010303140NINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM23,53123,531 2060305160NNAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)742742 2070305192NMILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES4,8044,804 2080305204NTACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES8,3818,381 2110305208MDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS5,5355,535 2120305208NDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS19,71819,718 2130305220NRQ–4 UAV375,235375,235 2140305231NMQ–8 UAV48,71348,713 2150305232MRQ–11 UAV102102 2160305233NRQ–7 UAV710710 2170305234NSMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)5,0135,013 2190305239MRQ–21A11,12211,122 2200305241NMULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT28,85128,851 2210308601NMODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT5,1165,116 2220702207NDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)28,04228,042 2230708011NINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS50,93350,933 2240708730NMARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)4,9984,998 224A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,185,1321,185,132 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT3,385,8223,403,922 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY15,974,78016,032,880 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 0010601102FDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES373,151373,151 0020601103FUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES138,333138,333 0030601108FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES13,28613,286 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH524,770524,770 APPLIED RESEARCH 0040602102FMATERIALS116,846116,846 0050602201FAEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES119,672119,672 0060602202FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH89,48389,483 0070602203FAEROSPACE PROPULSION197,546197,546 0080602204FAEROSPACE SENSORS127,539127,539 0090602601FSPACE TECHNOLOGY104,063104,063 0100602602FCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS81,52181,521 0110602605FDIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY112,845112,845 0120602788FDOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS138,161138,161 0130602890FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH40,21740,217 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH1,127,8931,127,893 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0140603112FADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS39,57249,572 Program increase[10,000] 0150603199FSUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)12,80012,800 0160603203FADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS30,57930,579 0170603211FAEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO77,34777,347 0180603216FAEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY149,321149,321 0190603270FELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY49,12849,128 0200603401FADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY68,07168,071 0210603444FMAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)26,29926,299 0220603456FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT20,96720,967 0230603601FCONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY33,99633,996 0240603605FADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY19,00019,000 0250603680FMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM41,35341,353 0260603788FBATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION49,09349,093 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT617,526627,526 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 0280603260FINTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT3,9833,983 0290603287FPHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT3,8743,874 0320603438FSPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY27,02427,024 0330603742FCOMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY15,89915,899 0340603790FNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT4,5684,568 0350603791FINTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D379379 0360603830FSPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP)28,76428,764 0380603851FINTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL86,73786,737 0400603859FPOLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL953953 0420604015FLONG RANGE STRIKE379,437379,437 0440604317FTECHNOLOGY TRANSFER2,6062,606 0450604327FHARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM103103 0470604337FREQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION16,01816,018 0490604458FAIR & SPACE OPS CENTER58,86158,861 0500604618FJOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION2,5002,500 0510604635FGROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT21,17521,175 0530604858FTECH TRANSITION PROGRAM13,63613,636 0540105921FSERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES2,7992,799 0550207455FTHREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)70,16070,160 0560305164FNAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)137,233137,233 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES876,709876,709 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0580603260FINTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT977977 0610604233FSPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING3,6013,601 0620604270FELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT1,9711,971 0640604281FTACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE51,45651,456 0650604287FPHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT5050 0660604329FSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD115,000115,000 0670604421FCOUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS23,93023,930 0680604425FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS400,258400,258 0690604429FAIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK4,5754,575 0700604441FSPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD352,532372,532 Space Based Infrared Systems (SBIRS) Data Exploitation[20,000] 0710604602FARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT16,28416,284 0720604604FSUBMUNITIONS2,5642,564 0730604617FAGILE COMBAT SUPPORT17,03617,036 0740604706FLIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS7,2737,273 0750604735FCOMBAT TRAINING RANGES33,20033,200 0780604800FF–35—EMD816,335816,335 0790604851FINTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD145,442145,442 0800604853FEVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD27,96327,963 0810604932FLONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON5,0005,000 0820604933FICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION129,411129,411 0830605213FF–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B131,100131,100 0840605221FKC–461,558,5901,558,590 0850605229FCSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION393,558393,558 0860605278FHC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E6,2426,242 0870605431FADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)272,872272,872 0880605432FPOLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)124,805124,805 0890605433FWIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)13,94813,948 0900605931FB–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM303,500303,500 0910101125FNUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION67,87467,874 0940207701FFULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING4,6634,663 0970401318FCV–2246,70546,705 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION5,078,7155,098,715 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0990604256FTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT17,69017,690 1000604759FMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT34,84134,841 1010605101FRAND PROJECT AIR FORCE32,95632,956 1030605712FINITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION13,61013,610 1040605807FTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT742,658742,658 1050605860FROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)14,20314,203 1060605864FSPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)13,00013,000 1070605976FFACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT44,16044,160 1080605978FFACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT27,64327,643 1090606323FMULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE13,93513,935 1100606392FSPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE192,348192,348 1110702806FACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT28,64728,647 1120804731FGENERAL SKILL TRAINING315315 1141001004FINTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES3,7853,785 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,179,7911,179,791 OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 1150603423FGLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT383,500383,500 1170604445FWIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE5,0005,000 1180605018FAF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)90,09790,097 1190605024FANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY32,08632,086 1210101113FB–52 SQUADRONS24,00724,007 1220101122FAIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)450450 1230101126FB–1B SQUADRONS19,58919,589 1240101127FB–2 SQUADRONS100,194100,194 1250101313FSTRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM37,44837,448 1280102326FREGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,7001,700 1300203761FWARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION FUND3,8443,844 1310205219FMQ–9 UAV128,328128,328 1330207131FA–10 SQUADRONS9,6149,614 1340207133FF–16 SQUADRONS177,298177,298 1350207134FF–15E SQUADRONS244,289244,289 1360207136FMANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION13,13813,138 1370207138FF–22A SQUADRONS328,542328,542 1380207142FF–35 SQUADRONS33,00033,000 1390207161FTACTICAL AIM MISSILES15,46015,460 1400207163FADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)84,17284,172 1420207224FCOMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY2,5822,582 1430207227FCOMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE542542 1440207247FAF TENCAP89,81689,816 1450207249FPRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT1,0751,075 1460207253FCOMPASS CALL10,78210,782 1470207268FAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM139,369139,369 1490207325FJOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)6,3736,373 1500207410FAIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)22,82022,820 1510207412FCONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)7,0297,029 1520207417FAIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS)186,256186,256 1530207418FTACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS743743 1560207431FCOMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES4,4714,471 1580207444FTACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD10,25010,250 1590207448FC2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK1,4311,431 1600207449FCOMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION7,3297,329 1610207452FDCAPES15,08115,081 1620207581FJOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS)13,24813,248 1630207590FSEEK EAGLE24,34224,342 1640207601FUSAF MODELING AND SIMULATION10,44810,448 1650207605FWARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS5,5125,512 1660207697FDISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES3,3013,301 1670208006FMISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS62,60562,605 1690208059FCYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES68,09968,099 1700208087FAF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS14,04714,047 1710208088FAF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS5,8535,853 1790301400FSPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE12,19712,197 1800302015FE–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)18,26718,267 1810303131FMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)36,28836,288 1820303140FINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM90,23190,231 1830303141FGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM725725 1850303601FMILSATCOM TERMINALS140,170140,170 1870304260FAIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE117,110117,110 1900305099FGLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)4,4304,430 1910305103FCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE2,0482,048 1920305105FDOD CYBER CRIME CENTER288288 1930305110FSATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)35,69835,698 1940305111FWEATHER SERVICE24,66724,667 1950305114FAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)35,67435,674 1960305116FAERIAL TARGETS21,18621,186 1990305128FSECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES195195 2000305145FARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION1,4301,430 2010305146FDEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES330330 2060305173FSPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER3,6963,696 2070305174FSPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,4692,469 2080305179FINTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)8,2898,289 2090305182FSPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)13,34513,345 2110305202FDRAGON U–218,70018,700 2120305205FENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES3,0003,000 2130305206FAIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS37,82837,828 2140305207FMANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS13,49113,491 2150305208FDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS7,4987,498 2160305219FMQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV3,3263,326 2170305220FRQ–4 UAV134,406134,406 2180305221FNETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING7,4137,413 2190305236FCOMMON DATA LINK (CDL)40,50340,503 2200305238FNATO AGS264,134264,134 2210305240FSUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE23,01623,016 2220305265FGPS III SPACE SEGMENT221,276221,276 2230305614FJSPOC MISSION SYSTEM58,52358,523 2240305881FRAPID CYBER ACQUISITION2,2182,218 2260305913FNUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)50,54750,547 2270305940FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS18,80718,807 2290308699FSHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)1,0791,079 2300401115FC–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON40026,400 C–130H Propulsion System Propeller Upgrades[26,000] 2310401119FC–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)61,49261,492 2320401130FC–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)109,134109,134 2330401132FC–130J PROGRAM22,44322,443 2340401134FLARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)4,1164,116 2380401314FOPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT44,55344,553 2390408011FSPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL6,2136,213 2400702207FDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)1,6051,605 2420708610FLOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)95,23895,238 2430708611FSUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT10,92510,925 2440804743FOTHER FLIGHT TRAINING1,3471,347 2450808716FOTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES6565 2460901202FJOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY1,0831,083 2470901218FCIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM1,5771,577 2480901220FPERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION5,9905,990 2490901226FAIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY786786 2500901279FFACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE654654 2510901538FFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT135,735135,735 252A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS11,874,52811,894,528 Program Increase[20,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT16,297,54216,343,542 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF25,702,94625,778,946 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 0010601000BRDTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE45,83745,837 0020601101EDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES315,033315,033 0030601110D8ZBASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES11,17111,171 0040601117EBASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE49,50049,500 0050601120D8ZNATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM84,27189,271 Restore PK–12 funding[5,000] 0060601228D8ZHISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS30,89535,895 Program increase[5,000] 0070601384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM51,42651,426 SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH588,133598,133 APPLIED RESEARCH 0080602000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY20,06513,565 Decrease to insensitive munitions program[–6,500] 0090602115EBIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY114,790114,790 0110602234D8ZLINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM46,87546,875 0130602251D8ZAPPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES45,00045,000 0140602303EINFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY413,260413,260 0150602304ECOGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS16,33016,330 0170602383EBIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE24,53724,537 0180602384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM227,065217,065 Program decrease[–10,000] 0200602668D8ZCYBER SECURITY RESEARCH18,90818,908 0220602702ETACTICAL TECHNOLOGY225,977225,977 0230602715EMATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY166,654166,654 0240602716EELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY243,469243,469 0250602718BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES175,282175,282 0260602751D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH11,10711,107 0271160401BBSPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT29,24629,246 SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH1,778,5651,762,065 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 0280603000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY26,64626,646 0290603121D8ZSO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT19,42019,920 Program increase for future information operations strategy[500] 0300603122D8ZCOMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT77,79277,792 0310603160BRCOUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT274,033274,033 0320603175CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY309,203239,203 Decrease in funding of Common Kill Vehicle Technology Program[–70,000] 0340603225D8ZJOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT19,30519,305 0350603264SAGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY7,5657,565 0360603274CSPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY40,42640,426 0370603286EADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS149,804149,804 0380603287ESPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY172,546172,546 0390603384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT170,847170,847 0400603618D8ZJOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY9,0099,009 0410603648D8ZJOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS174,428167,428 Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts[–7,000] 0420603662D8ZNETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES20,00020,000 0450603668D8ZCYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH19,66819,668 0470603680D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM34,04134,041 0480603699D8ZEMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT61,97153,971 Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts[–8,000] 0500603712SGENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS20,00020,000 0510603713SDEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY30,25630,256 0520603716D8ZSTRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM72,32472,324 0530603720SMICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT82,70082,700 0540603727D8ZJOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM8,4318,431 0550603739EADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES117,080117,080 0570603760ECOMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS239,078239,078 0590603766ENETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY259,006259,006 0600603767ESENSOR TECHNOLOGY286,364286,364 0610603769SEDISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT12,11612,116 0620603781D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE19,00819,008 0630603826D8ZQUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS78,53278,532 0650603828JJOINT EXPERIMENTATION12,66712,667 0660603832D8ZDOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE41,37041,370 0690603941D8ZTEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY92,50892,508 0700604055D8ZOPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT52,00160,001 Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund[8,000] 0710303310D8ZCWMD SYSTEMS52,05352,053 0721160402BBSPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT46,80946,809 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT3,109,0073,032,507 ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 0750603161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P63,64163,641 0760603527D8ZRETRACT LARCH19,15219,152 0770603600D8ZWALKOFF70,76370,763 0790603714D8ZADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM17,23017,230 0800603851D8ZENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM71,45371,453 0810603881CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT268,990268,990 0820603882CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT1,033,9031,174,303 Planning and Design (35% to 100% design)[50,000] RDT&E Ground Systems Development[70,000] RDT&E Site Activities, including EIS[20,400] 082A0603XXXCCOMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY AND CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM070,000 Common Kill Vehicle Technology Program[70,000] 0830603884BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL196,237196,237 0840603884CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS315,183315,183 0860603890CBMD ENABLING PROGRAMS377,605377,605 0870603891CSPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA286,613286,613 0880603892CAEGIS BMD937,056937,056 0890603893CSPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM44,94744,947 0900603895CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS6,5156,515 0910603896CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI418,355418,355 0920603898CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT47,41947,419 0930603904CMISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)52,13152,131 0940603906CREGARDING TRENCH13,86413,864 0950603907CSEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)44,47844,478 0960603913CISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS95,782283,782 Development of increased capabilities for Iron Dome[15,000] Increase Israeli Cooperative Programs[173,000] 0970603914CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST375,866375,866 0980603915CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS495,257495,257 0990603920D8ZHUMANITARIAN DEMINING11,70411,704 1000603923D8ZCOALITION WARFARE9,8429,842 1010604016D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM3,31213,312 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation[10,000] 1020604250D8ZADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES130,00025,000 Decrease to SCO efforts[–105,000] 1030604400D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT8,3008,300 1040604445JWIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE30,00030,000 1060604775D8ZDEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM0250,000 Rapid Innovation Program[250,000] 1080604787JJOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION7,4027,402 1100604828JJOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM7,5067,506 1110604880CLAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)129,374129,374 1120604881CAEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT308,522308,522 1150303191D8ZJOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM3,1693,169 1160305103CCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE946946 SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES5,902,5176,455,917 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 1180604161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD8,1558,155 1190604165D8ZPROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT65,44065,440 1200604384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD451,306451,306 1220604764KADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)29,13829,138 1230604771D8ZJOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)19,47519,475 1240605000BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES12,90112,901 1250605013BLINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT13,81213,812 1260605021SEHOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE386386 1270605022D8ZDEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM3,7633,763 1280605027D8ZOUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES6,7886,788 1290605070SDOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION27,91727,917 1300605075D8ZDCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION22,29722,297 1310605080SDEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM51,68951,689 1320605210D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES6,1846,184 1330303141KGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM12,08312,083 1340305304D8ZDOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)3,3023,302 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION734,636734,636 MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 1350604774D8ZDEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)6,3936,393 1360604875D8ZJOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT2,4792,479 1370604940D8ZCENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)240,213240,213 1380604942D8ZASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS2,1272,127 1390604943D8ZTHERMAL VICAR8,2878,287 1400605100D8ZJOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)31,00031,000 1410605104D8ZTECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS24,37924,379 1430605117D8ZFOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION54,31154,311 1440605126JJOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)47,46247,462 1460605130D8ZFOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING12,13412,134 1470605142D8ZSYSTEMS ENGINEERING44,23744,237 1480605151D8ZSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD5,8715,871 1490605161D8ZNUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY5,0285,028 1500605170D8ZSUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION6,3016,301 1510605200D8ZGENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)6,5046,504 1520605384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM92,04692,046 1580605790D8ZSMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S1,8681,868 1590605798D8ZDEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS8,3628,362 1600605801KADEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)56,02456,024 1610605803SER&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION6,9086,908 1620605804D8ZDEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION15,45119,451 Program increase[4,000] 1640605898EMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D71,65971,659 1650606100D8ZBUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS4,0834,083 1670203345D8ZDEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)5,3065,306 1680204571JJOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT2,0972,097 1720303166JSUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES8,3948,394 1750305193D8ZCYBER INTELLIGENCE7,6247,624 1780804767D8ZCOCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)43,24743,247 1790901598CMANAGEMENT HQ—MDA37,71237,712 1800901598D8WMANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS607607 181A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS54,91454,914 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT913,028917,028 OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 1820604130VENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)7,5527,552 1830605127TREGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA3,2703,270 1840605147TOVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)287287 1850607210D8ZINDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT14,00014,000 1860607310D8ZOPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT1,9551,955 1870607327TGLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)13,25013,250 1880607384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)13,02613,026 1900607828JJOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY12,65212,652 1910208043JPLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)3,0613,061 1920208045KC4I INTEROPERABILITY72,72672,726 1940301144KJOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING6,5246,524 2010302016KNATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT512512 2020302019KDEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION12,86712,867 2030303126KLONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS36,56536,565 2040303131KMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)13,14413,144 2050303135GPUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)1,0601,060 2060303136GKEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)33,27933,279 2070303140D8ZINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM10,67310,673 2080303140GINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM181,567179,291 Excess to need[–2,276] 2100303150KGLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM34,28834,288 2110303153KDEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION7,7417,741 2120303170KNET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)3,3253,325 2130303260D8ZDEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)1,2461,246 2140303610KTELEPORT PROGRAM5,1475,147 2160304210BBSPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES17,35217,352 2200305103KCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE3,6583,658 2210305125D8ZCRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP)9,7529,752 2250305186D8ZPOLICY R&D PROGRAMS3,2103,210 2270305199D8ZNET CENTRICITY21,60221,602 2300305208BBDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS5,1955,195 2330305208KDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS3,3483,348 2350305219BBMQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV641641 2380305387D8ZHOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM2,3382,338 2390305600D8ZINTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES4,3724,372 2470708011SINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS24,69124,691 2480708012SLOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES4,6594,659 2490902298JMANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS3,5333,533 2501105219BBMQ–9 UAV1,3141,314 2541160403BBAVIATION SYSTEMS156,561156,561 2561160405BBSPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT7,7057,705 2571160408BBSOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS42,62042,620 2611160431BBWARRIOR SYSTEMS17,97017,970 2621160432BBSPECIAL PROGRAMS7,4247,424 2681160480BBSOF TACTICAL VEHICLES2,2062,206 2711160483BBMARITIME SYSTEMS18,32518,325 2741160489BBSOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES3,3043,304 2751160490BBSOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE16,02116,021 275A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,773,7043,773,704 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT4,641,2224,638,946 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW17,667,10818,139,232 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 0010605118OTEOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION75,72075,720 0020605131OTELIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION48,42348,423 0030605814OTEOPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES62,15762,157 SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT186,300186,300 TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE186,300186,300 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION67,520,23668,079,460 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) LineProgramElementItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 0870604622AFAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES7,0007,000 SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION7,0007,000 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY7,0007,000 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 224A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS34,42634,426 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT34,42634,426 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY34,42634,426 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 252A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS9,0009,000 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT9,0009,000 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF9,0009,000 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 275A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS66,20866,208 SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT66,20866,208 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW66,20866,208 TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION116,634116,634 XLIII OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 4301. Operation and maintenance SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS888,1141,096,714 Missile Defense Deployment to Guam[13,100] Restore Army OPTEMPO to 90%[195,500] 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES72,62472,624 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE617,402617,402 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS602,262602,262 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,032,4841,032,484 060AVIATION ASSETS1,287,4621,303,262 Restore Army Flying Hour Program to 90%[15,800] 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT3,559,6563,559,656 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS454,477454,477 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,481,1561,481,156 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT7,278,1547,278,154 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION2,754,7123,011,712 Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations[–25,000] Sustainment to 90%[282,000] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S425,271425,271 130COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS185,064185,064 170COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS463,270456,594 Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations[3,100] Unjustified EUCOM Growth[–9,776] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES21,102,10821,576,832 MOBILIZATION 180STRATEGIC MOBILITY360,240360,240 190ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS192,105192,105 200INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS7,1017,101 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION559,446559,446 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 210OFFICER ACQUISITION115,992115,992 220RECRUIT TRAINING52,32352,323 230ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING43,58943,589 240SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS453,745453,745 250SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING1,034,4951,034,495 260FLIGHT TRAINING1,016,8761,016,876 270PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION186,565186,565 280TRAINING SUPPORT652,514652,514 290RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING485,500485,500 300EXAMINING170,912170,912 310OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION251,523251,523 320CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING184,422184,422 330JUNIOR ROTC181,105181,105 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING4,829,5614,829,561 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 350SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION690,089690,089 360CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES774,120779,120 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation[5,000] 370LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES651,765651,765 380AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT453,051453,051 390ADMINISTRATION487,737487,737 400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS1,563,1151,563,115 410MANPOWER MANAGEMENT326,853326,853 420OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT234,364234,364 430OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT1,212,0911,212,091 440ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES243,540243,540 450REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT241,101241,101 460BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT226,291226,291 470SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS426,651457,851 Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M Defense-wide[31,200] 480MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS27,24824,148 Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations[–3,100] 525CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,023,9461,023,946 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES8,581,9628,615,062 UNDISTRIBUTED 530UNDISTRIBUTED0–740,300 Average civilian end strength above projection[–284,300] Unobligated balances[–456,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0–740,300 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY35,073,07734,840,601 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS1,6211,621 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES24,42924,429 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE657,099657,099 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS122,485122,485 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT584,058584,058 060AVIATION ASSETS79,38079,380 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT471,616471,616 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS74,24374,243 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE70,89470,894 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT569,801569,801 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION294,145323,245 Sustainment to 90%[29,100] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S51,85351,853 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES3,001,6243,030,724 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION10,73510,735 140ADMINISTRATION24,19724,197 150SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS10,30410,304 160MANPOWER MANAGEMENT10,31910,319 170RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING37,85737,857 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES93,41293,412 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES3,095,0363,124,136 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS800,880800,880 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES178,650178,650 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE771,503771,503 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS98,69998,699 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT38,77938,779 060AVIATION ASSETS922,503922,503 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT761,056761,056 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS62,97162,971 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE233,105233,105 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,019,0591,019,059 110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION712,139786,339 Sustainment to 90%[74,200] 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S1,013,7151,013,715 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES6,613,0596,687,259 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION10,81210,812 140REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT1,5511,551 150ADMINISTRATION78,28478,284 160SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS46,99546,995 170MANPOWER MANAGEMENT6,3906,390 180RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING297,105297,105 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES441,137441,137 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG7,054,1967,128,396 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS4,952,5224,952,522 020FLEET AIR TRAINING1,826,4041,826,404 030AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES38,63938,639 040AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT90,03090,030 050AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT362,700362,700 060AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE915,881915,881 070AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT35,83835,838 080AVIATION LOGISTICS379,914448,414 CLS for AVN Logistics[68,500] 090MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS3,884,8363,884,836 100SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING734,852734,852 110SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE5,191,5115,191,511 120SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,351,2741,351,274 130COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS701,316691,722 New START treaty implementation, excluding verification and inspection activities[–9,594] 140ELECTRONIC WARFARE97,71097,710 150SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE172,330172,330 160WARFARE TACTICS454,682454,682 170OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY328,406328,406 180COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES946,429946,429 190EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE142,249148,249 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation[6,000] 200DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT2,6032,603 210COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS102,970102,970 220COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT199,128199,128 230CRUISE MISSILE92,67192,671 240FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE1,193,1881,193,188 250IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT105,985105,985 260WEAPONS MAINTENANCE532,627532,627 270OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT304,160304,160 280ENTERPRISE INFORMATION1,011,5281,011,528 290SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION1,996,8212,182,021 Sustainment to 90%[185,200] 300BASE OPERATING SUPPORT4,460,9184,460,918 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES32,610,12232,860,228 MOBILIZATION 310SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE331,576331,576 320AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS6,6386,638 330SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS222,752222,752 340EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS73,31073,310 350INDUSTRIAL READINESS2,6752,675 360COAST GUARD SUPPORT23,79423,794 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION660,745660,745 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 370OFFICER ACQUISITION148,516148,516 380RECRUIT TRAINING9,3849,384 390RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS139,876139,876 400SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING630,069630,069 410FLIGHT TRAINING9,2949,294 420PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION169,082169,082 430TRAINING SUPPORT164,368164,368 440RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING241,733242,833 Naval Sea Cadets[1,100] 450OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION139,815139,815 460CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING94,63294,632 470JUNIOR ROTC51,37351,373 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING1,798,1421,799,242 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 480ADMINISTRATION886,088886,088 490EXTERNAL RELATIONS13,13113,131 500CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT115,742115,742 510MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT382,150382,150 520OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT268,403268,403 530SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS317,293317,293 550SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION207,128207,128 570PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN295,855295,855 580ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT1,140,4841,140,484 590HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT52,87352,873 600COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS27,58727,587 610SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS75,72875,728 620NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE543,026543,026 680INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES4,9654,965 705CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS545,775545,775 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES4,876,2284,876,228 UNDISTRIBUTED 710UNDISTRIBUTED0–278,200 Average civilian end strength above projection[–38,500] Unobligated balances[–239,700] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0–278,200 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY39,945,23739,918,243 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATIONAL FORCES837,012902,012 Crisis Response Force[30,000] Marine Security Guard[35,000] 020FIELD LOGISTICS894,555898,555 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation[4,000] 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE223,337221,337 Unjustified Growth HUMVEE Modifications[–2,000] 040MARITIME PREPOSITIONING97,87897,878 050SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION774,619781,719 Sustainment to 90%[7,100] 060BASE OPERATING SUPPORT2,166,6612,166,661 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES4,994,0625,068,162 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 070RECRUIT TRAINING17,69317,693 080OFFICER ACQUISITION896896 090SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING100,806100,806 100PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION46,92846,928 110TRAINING SUPPORT356,426356,426 120RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING179,747179,747 130OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION52,25552,255 140JUNIOR ROTC23,13823,138 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING777,889777,889 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION43,81643,816 160ADMINISTRATION305,107305,107 180ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT87,50087,500 185CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS46,27646,276 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES482,699482,699 UNDISTRIBUTED 190UNDISTRIBUTED0–50,000 Unobligated balances[–50,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0–50,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS6,254,6506,278,750 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS586,620586,620 020INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE7,0087,008 040AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE100,657100,657 050AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT305305 060AVIATION LOGISTICS3,9273,927 070MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS75,93375,933 080SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING601601 090SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE44,36444,364 100COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS15,47715,477 110COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES115,608115,608 120WEAPONS MAINTENANCE1,9671,967 130ENTERPRISE INFORMATION43,72643,726 140SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION69,01174,011 Sustainment to 90%[5,000] 150BASE OPERATING SUPPORT109,604109,604 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES1,174,8081,179,808 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160ADMINISTRATION2,9052,905 170MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT14,42514,425 180SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS2,4852,485 190ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT3,1293,129 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES22,94422,944 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES1,197,7521,202,752 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATING FORCES96,24496,244 020DEPOT MAINTENANCE17,58119,081 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[1,500] 030SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION32,43832,738 Sustainment to 90%[300] 040BASE OPERATING SUPPORT95,25995,259 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES241,522243,322 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 050SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION894894 060ADMINISTRATION11,74311,743 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING9,1589,158 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES21,79521,795 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE263,317265,117 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES3,295,8143,295,814 020COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES1,875,0951,875,095 030AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)1,559,1091,559,109 040DEPOT MAINTENANCE5,956,3045,961,304 Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation[5,000] 050FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION1,834,4242,224,454 Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls[12,000] Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls[5,730] Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls[152,800] Sustainment to 90%[219,500] 060BASE SUPPORT2,779,8112,779,811 070GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING913,841913,841 080OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS916,837916,837 100TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES720,349720,349 110LAUNCH FACILITIES305,275305,275 120SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS433,658433,658 130COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT1,146,0161,147,116 NORTHCOM VOICE program[1,100] 140COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS231,830231,830 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES21,968,36322,364,493 MOBILIZATION 150AIRLIFT OPERATIONS2,015,9022,015,902 160MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS147,216147,216 170DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,556,2321,556,232 180FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION167,402167,402 190BASE SUPPORT707,040707,040 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION4,593,7924,593,792 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 200OFFICER ACQUISITION102,334102,334 210RECRUIT TRAINING17,73317,733 220RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)94,60094,600 230FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION217,011217,011 240BASE SUPPORT800,327800,327 250SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING399,364399,364 260FLIGHT TRAINING792,275792,275 270PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION248,958248,958 280TRAINING SUPPORT106,741106,741 290DEPOT MAINTENANCE319,331319,331 300RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING122,736122,736 310EXAMINING3,6793,679 320OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION137,255137,255 330CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING176,153176,153 340JUNIOR ROTC67,01867,018 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING3,605,5153,605,515 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 350LOGISTICS OPERATIONS1,103,6841,103,684 360TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES919,923919,923 370DEPOT MAINTENANCE56,60152,601 Heavy bomber eliminations related to New START treaty implementation[–400] ICBM reductions related to New START implementation[–3,600] 380FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION281,061281,061 390BASE SUPPORT1,203,3051,203,305 400ADMINISTRATION593,865593,865 410SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS574,609574,609 420OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES1,028,6001,013,200 De-MIRVing ICBMs related to New START treaty implementation[–700] ICBM eliminations and Environmental Impact Study related to New START treaty implementation[–14,700] 430CIVIL AIR PATROL24,72024,720 460INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT89,00889,008 465CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,227,7961,222,996 Classified Adjustment[–4,800] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES7,103,1727,078,972 UNDISTRIBUTED 470UNDISTRIBUTED0–205,100 Average civilian end strength above projection[–18,700] Unobligated balances[–186,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0–205,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE37,270,84237,437,672 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES1,857,9511,857,951 020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS224,462224,462 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE521,182521,182 040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION89,70498,804 Sustainment to 90%[9,100] 050BASE SUPPORT360,836360,836 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES3,054,1353,063,235 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 060ADMINISTRATION64,36264,362 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING15,05615,056 080MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)23,61723,617 090OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)6,6186,618 100AUDIOVISUAL819819 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES110,472110,472 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE3,164,6073,173,707 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 010AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS3,371,8713,371,871 020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS720,305720,305 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,514,8701,514,870 040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION296,953323,853 Sustainment to 90%[26,900] 050BASE SUPPORT597,303597,303 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES6,501,3026,528,202 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 060ADMINISTRATION32,11732,117 070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING32,58532,585 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES64,70264,702 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG6,566,0046,592,904 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 010JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF472,239472,239 020SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND5,261,4635,230,711 AFSOC Flying Hour Program[70,100] International SOF Information Sharing System[–7,017] Ongoing baseline contingency operations[–35,519] Pilot program for SOF family members[5,000] Preserve the force and families—human performance program[–16,605] Preserve the force and families—resiliency[–8,786] Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, Army[–31,200] Regional SOF Coordination Centers[–14,725] SOCOM National Capitol Region[–10,000] USASOC Flying Hour Program[18,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES5,733,7025,702,950 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 040DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY157,397157,397 050NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY84,89984,899 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING242,296242,296 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 060CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS144,443165,443 STARBASE[21,000] 080DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY612,207612,207 090DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY1,378,6061,378,606 110DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY763,091763,091 120DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY1,326,2431,326,243 140DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY29,93329,933 150DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY462,545462,545 160DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY222,979222,979 170DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE21,59421,594 180DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY788,389788,389 190DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE546,603546,603 210DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION35,15135,151 220DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY438,033438,033 240DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY2,713,7562,713,756 250MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY256,201256,201 270OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT371,615217,715 Program reduction[–153,900] 280OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE2,010,1761,992,676 BRAC 2015 Initiative[–8,000] Combatant Commanders Exercise Engagement Training Transformation[90,500] Procurement Technical Assistance Program—Enhanced Business Support[10,000] Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories[–35,000] Reduction to Building Partnership Capacity authories[–75,000] 290WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES616,572616,572 295CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS14,283,55814,287,648 Classified adjustment[75,000] Classified adjustment[–70,910] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES27,021,69526,875,385 UNDISTRIBUTED 305UNDISTRIBUTED0–320,000 Section 514. Study of Reserve Component General and Flag Officers[3,000] Section 551. Department of Defense Recognition of Spouses of Members of Armed Forces who Serve in Combat Zones[5,000] Section 571 .DOD Supplementary Impact Aid[25,000] Section 621. Expand the victims transitional compensation benefit[10,000] Unobligated balances[–363,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0–320,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE32,997,69332,500,631 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 050OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID109,500109,500 060COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION528,455528,455 080ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD256,031256,031 090ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY298,815298,815 160OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND5,0000 Program reduction[–5,000] SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS1,197,8011,192,801 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 100ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY316,103316,103 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS316,103316,103 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 110ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE439,820439,820 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS439,820439,820 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 040US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE13,60612,626 Unjustified Growth[–980] 120ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE10,75710,757 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS24,36323,383 MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 130ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES237,443237,443 SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS237,443237,443 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS2,215,5302,209,550 TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE175,097,941174,672,459 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) LineItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS217,571247,571 Missile Defense Deployment—Other[15,000] Missile Defense Deployment to Turkey[15,000] 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES8,2668,266 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE56,62656,626 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS4,209,9424,209,942 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT950,567950,567 060AVIATION ASSETS474,288474,288 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,349,1521,349,152 080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS655,000655,000 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE301,563796,563 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance[495,000] 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT706,214706,214 140ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES11,519,49811,519,498 150COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM60,00060,000 160RESET2,240,3583,740,358 Restore Critical Army Reset[1,500,000] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES22,749,04524,774,045 ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 350SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION4,601,3564,601,356 380AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT17,41817,418 400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS110,000110,000 420OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT94,82094,820 430OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT54,00054,000 450REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT250,000250,000 525CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,402,9941,402,994 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES6,530,5886,530,588 UNDISTRIBUTED 530UNDISTRIBUTED091,100 Increase to support higher fuel rates[91,100] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED091,100 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY29,279,63331,395,733 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE6,9956,995 050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT2,3322,332 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT608608 090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE075,800 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance[75,800] 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT33,00033,000 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES42,935118,735 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES42,935118,735 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 010MANEUVER UNITS29,31429,314 020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES1,4941,494 030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE15,34315,343 040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS1,5491,549 060AVIATION ASSETS64,50464,504 070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT31,51231,512 100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT42,17942,179 120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ'S11,99611,996 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES197,891197,891 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 160SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS1,4801,480 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES1,4801,480 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG199,371199,371 AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 010SUSTAINMENT2,735,6032,735,603 020INFRASTRUCTURE278,650278,650 030EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION2,180,3822,180,382 040TRAINING AND OPERATIONS626,550626,550 SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE5,821,1855,821,185 MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 060SUSTAINMENT1,214,9951,214,995 080EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION54,69654,696 090TRAINING AND OPERATIONS626,119626,119 SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR1,895,8101,895,810 DETAINEE OPS 110SUSTAINMENT7,2257,225 140TRAINING AND OPERATIONS2,5002,500 SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS9,7259,725 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND7,726,7207,726,720 AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 010POWER279,000279,000 SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND279,000279,000 TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND279,000279,000 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS845,169845,169 030AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES600600 040AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT17,48917,489 050AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT78,49178,491 060AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE162,420202,420 Restore critical depot maintenance[40,000] 070AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT2,7002,700 080AVIATION LOGISTICS50,13050,130 090MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS949,539960,939 Spares[11,400] 100SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING20,22620,226 110SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,679,6601,843,660 Program increase[164,000] 120SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT0126,000 Program increase[126,000] 130COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS37,76037,760 160WARFARE TACTICS25,35125,351 170OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY20,04520,045 180COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES1,212,2961,665,296 Combat forces equipment[148,000] Combat forces shortfall[305,000] 190EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE10,20310,203 250IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT127,972127,972 260WEAPONS MAINTENANCE221,427221,427 290SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION13,38613,386 300BASE OPERATING SUPPORT110,940110,940 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES5,585,8046,380,204 MOBILIZATION 340EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS18,46018,460 360COAST GUARD SUPPORT227,033227,033 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION245,493245,493 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 400SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING50,26950,269 430TRAINING SUPPORT5,4005,400 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING55,66955,669 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 480ADMINISTRATION2,4182,418 490EXTERNAL RELATIONS516516 510MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT5,1075,107 520OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT1,4111,411 530SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS2,5452,545 550SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION153,427153,427 580ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT8,5708,570 620NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE1,4251,425 705CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS5,6085,608 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES181,027181,027 UNDISTRIBUTED 710UNDISTRIBUTED0155,400 Increase to support higher fuel rates[155,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0155,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY6,067,9937,017,793 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATIONAL FORCES992,190992,190 020FIELD LOGISTICS559,574559,574 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE570,000626,000 Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance[56,000] 060BASE OPERATING SUPPORT69,72669,726 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES2,191,4902,247,490 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 110TRAINING SUPPORT108,270108,270 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING108,270108,270 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 150SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION365,555365,555 160ADMINISTRATION3,6753,675 185CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS825825 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES370,055370,055 UNDISTRIBUTED 190UNDISTRIBUTED05,400 Increase to support higher fuel rates[5,400] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED05,400 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS2,669,8152,731,215 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS17,19617,196 020INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE200200 040AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE6,0006,000 070MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS12,30412,304 090SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE6,7906,790 110COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES13,21013,210 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES55,70055,700 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES55,70055,700 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 010OPERATING FORCES11,12411,124 040BASE OPERATING SUPPORT1,4101,410 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES12,53412,534 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE12,53412,534 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES1,712,3931,782,393 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[70,000] 020COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES836,104836,104 030AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)14,11814,118 040DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,373,4801,473,480 Program increase[100,000] 050FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION122,712122,712 060BASE SUPPORT1,520,3331,520,333 070GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING31,58231,582 080OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS147,524147,524 110LAUNCH FACILITIES857857 120SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS8,3538,353 130COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT50,49550,495 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES5,817,9515,987,951 MOBILIZATION 150AIRLIFT OPERATIONS3,091,1333,141,133 Restore Critical Depot Maintenance[50,000] 160MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS47,89747,897 170DEPOT MAINTENANCE387,179887,179 Program increase[500,000] 180FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION7,0437,043 190BASE SUPPORT68,38268,382 SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION3,601,6344,151,634 TRAINING AND RECRUITING 200OFFICER ACQUISITION100100 210RECRUIT TRAINING478478 240BASE SUPPORT19,25619,256 250SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING12,84512,845 260FLIGHT TRAINING731731 270PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION607607 280TRAINING SUPPORT720720 320OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION152152 SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING34,88934,889 ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 350LOGISTICS OPERATIONS86,27386,273 360TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES2,5112,511 390BASE SUPPORT19,88719,887 400ADMINISTRATION3,4933,493 410SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS152,086152,086 420OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES269,825269,825 460INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT117117 465CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS16,55816,558 SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES550,750550,750 UNDISTRIBUTED 470UNDISTRIBUTED0284,000 Increase to support higher fuel rates[284,000] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED0284,000 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE10,005,22411,009,224 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 030DEPOT MAINTENANCE26,59926,599 050BASE SUPPORT6,2506,250 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES32,84932,849 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE32,84932,849 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS22,20022,200 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES22,20022,200 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG22,20022,200 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 020SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND2,222,8682,222,868 SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES2,222,8682,222,868 ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 080DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY27,78127,781 090DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY45,74645,746 120DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY76,34876,348 140DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY99,53899,538 160DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY9,6209,620 180DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY1,950,0001,950,000 240DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY100,100100,100 280OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE38,22773,227 Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories[35,000] 290WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES2,7842,784 295CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,862,0661,862,066 SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES4,212,2104,247,210 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE6,435,0786,470,078 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE62,829,05267,071,152 XLIV MILITARY PERSONNEL 4401. Military personnel SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized Military Personnel Appropriations130,399,881130,219,281 Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Guard[4,500] Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Reserve[900] Military Personnel unobligated[–186,000] Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions6,676,7506,676,750 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized Military Personnel Appropriations9,689,3079,689,307 Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions164,033164,033 XLV OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 4501. Other authorizations SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS25,15825,158 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY25,15825,158 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL)61,73161,731 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE61,73161,731 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)46,42846,428 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE46,42846,428 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,412,5101,412,510 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,412,5101,412,510 NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND MPF MLP134,917134,917 POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING43,40443,404 LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE116,784116,784 DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS60,70360,703 TAH MAINTENANCE19,80919,809 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT56,05856,058 READY RESERVE FORCE299,025299,025 TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND730,700730,700 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE8,880,7388,880,738 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE15,842,73215,842,732 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT2,505,6402,505,640 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT1,450,6191,450,619 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES368,248368,248 EDUCATION AND TRAINING733,097733,097 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS1,872,6601,872,660 R&D RESEARCH9,1629,162 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT47,97747,977 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT291,156291,156 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION132,430132,430 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT161,674161,674 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT72,56872,568 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT14,64614,646 PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING89,40489,404 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION377,577377,577 PROC IEHR204,200204,200 UNDISTRIBUTED0–276,800 DHP Unobligated[–440,800] Section 711. Future Availability of TRICARE Prime for Certain Beneficiaries Enrolled in TRICARE Prime[164,000] TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM33,054,52832,777,728 CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION OPERATION & MAINTENANCE451,572451,572 RDT&E604,183604,183 PROCUREMENT1,3681,368 TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION1,057,1231,057,123 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES815,965815,965 DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM122,580122,580 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF938,545938,545 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE311,131311,131 PROCUREMENT1,0001,000 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL312,131312,131 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS37,638,85437,362,054 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) ItemFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS44,73244,732 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY44,73244,732 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE C–17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR78,50078,500 TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES10,00010,000 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE88,50088,500 WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)131,678131,678 TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE131,678131,678 DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE375,958375,958 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE382,560382,560 CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT132,749132,749 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT2,2382,238 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES460460 EDUCATION AND TRAINING10,23610,236 TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM904,201904,201 DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES376,305376,305 TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF376,305376,305 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE10,76610,766 TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL10,76610,766 TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS1,556,1821,556,182 XLVI MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 4601. Military construction SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) AccountState/Country and InstallationProject TitleBudget RequestHouse Agreement Alaska ArmyFort WainwrightAviation Battalion Complex45,00045,000 ArmyFort WainwrightAviation Storage Hangar58,00058,000 Colorado ArmyFort CarsonAircraft Maintenance Hangar66,00066,000 ArmyFort CarsonAircraft Maintenance Hangar73,00073,000 ArmyFort CarsonCentral Energy Plant34,00034,000 ArmyFort CarsonFire Station12,00012,000 ArmyFort CarsonHeadquarters Building33,00033,000 ArmyFort CarsonRunway12,00012,000 ArmyFort CarsonSimulator Building12,20012,200 Florida ArmyEglin AFBAutomated Sniper Field Fire Range4,7004,700 Georgia ArmyFort GordonAdv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph261,00061,000 Hawaii ArmyFort ShafterCommand and Control Facility—Admin75,00065,000 Kansas ArmyFort LeavenworthSimulations Center17,00017,000 Kentucky ArmyFort CampbellBattlefield Weather Support Facility4,8004,800 Maryland ArmyAberdeen Proving GroundOperations and Maintenance Facilities21,00021,000 ArmyFort DetrickEntry Control Point2,5002,500 ArmyFort DetrickHazardous Material Storage Building4,6004,600 Missouri ArmyFort Leonard WoodAdv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph186,00086,000 ArmyFort Leonard WoodSimulator Building4,7004,700 New York ArmyU.S. Military AcademyCadet Barracks, Incr 242,00042,000 North Carolina ArmyFort BraggCommand and Control Facility5,9005,900 Texas ArmyFort BlissControl Tower10,80010,800 ArmyFort BlissUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex36,00036,000 Virginia ArmyJoint Base Langley-EustisAdv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph350,00050,000 Washington ArmyJoint Base Lewis-McchordAircraft Maintenance Hangar79,00079,000 ArmyJoint Base Lewis-McchordAirfield Operations Complex37,00037,000 ArmyJoint Base Lewis-McchordAviation Battalion Complex28,00028,000 ArmyYakimaAutomated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range9,1009,100 Worldwide Classified ArmyClassified LocationCompany Operations Complex33,00033,000 Kwajalein ArmyKwajalein AtollPier63,00063,000 Worldwide Unspecified ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsHost Nation Support Fy1433,00023,000 ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMinor Construction Fy1425,00025,000 ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design Fy1441,57541,575 Total Military Construction, Army1,119,8751,099,875 California NavyBarstowEngine Dynamometer Facility14,99814,998 NavyCamp PendletonAmmunition Supply Point Upgrade13,12413,124 NavyCoronadoH–60 Trainer Facility8,9108,910 NavyPoint MuguAircraft Engine Test Pads7,1987,198 NavyPoint MuguBams Consolidated Maintenance Hangar17,46917,469 NavyPort HuenemeUnaccompanied Housing Conversion33,60033,600 NavySan DiegoSteam Plant Decentralization34,33134,331 NavyTwentynine PalmsCamp Wilson Infrastructure Upgrades33,43733,437 Florida NavyJacksonvilleP–8a Training & Parking Apron Expansion20,75220,752 NavyKey WestAircraft Crash/Rescue & Fire Headquarters14,00114,001 NavyMayportLcs Logistics Support Facility16,09316,093 Georgia NavyAlbanyCers Dispatch Facility1,0101,010 NavyAlbanyWeapons Storage and Inspection Facility15,60015,600 NavySavannahTownsend Bombing Range Land Acq—Phase 161,71761,717 Guam NavyJoint Region MarianasAircraft Maintenance Hangar—North Ramp85,67385,673 NavyJoint Region MarianasBams Forward Operational & Maintenance Hangar61,70261,702 NavyJoint Region MarianasDehumidified Supply Storage Facility17,17017,170 NavyJoint Region MarianasEmergent Repair Facility Expansion35,86035,860 NavyJoint Region MarianasModular Storage Magazines63,38263,382 NavyJoint Region MarianasSierra Wharf Improvements1,1701,170 NavyJoint Region MarianasX-Ray Wharf Improvements53,42053,420 Hawaii NavyKaneohe Bay3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/Operations Complex25,33625,336 NavyKaneohe BayAircraft Maintenance Expansion16,96816,968 NavyKaneohe BayAircraft Maintenance Hangar Upgrades31,82031,820 NavyKaneohe BayArmory Addition and Renovation12,95212,952 NavyKaneohe BayAviation Simulator Modernization/Addition17,72417,724 NavyKaneohe BayMv–22 Hangar57,51757,517 NavyKaneohe BayMv–22 Parking Apron and Infrastructure74,66574,665 NavyPearl CityWater Transmission Line30,10030,100 NavyPearl HarborDrydock Waterfront Facility22,72122,721 NavyPearl HarborSubmarine Production Support Facility35,27735,277 Illinois NavyGreat LakesUnaccompanied Housing35,85135,851 Maine NavyBangorNctams Vlf Commercial Power Connection13,80013,800 NavyKitteryStructural Shops Consolidation11,52211,522 Maryland NavyFort MeadeMarforcybercom HQ-Ops Building83,98883,988 Nevada NavyFallonWastewater Treatment Plant11,33411,334 North Carolina NavyCamp LejeuneLandfill—Phase 420,79520,795 NavyCamp LejeuneOperations Training Complex22,51522,515 NavyCamp LejeuneSteam Decentralization—BEQ Nodes18,67918,679 NavyCamp LejeuneSteam Decentralization—Camp Johnson2,6202,620 NavyCamp LejeuneSteam Decentralization—Hadnot Point13,39013,390 NavyNew RiverCh–53k Maintenance Training Facility13,21813,218 NavyNew RiverCorrosion Control Hangar12,54712,547 NavyNew RiverRegional Communication Station20,09820,098 Oklahoma NavyTinker AFBTacamo E–6B Hangar14,14414,144 Rhode Island NavyNewportHewitt Hall Research Center12,42212,422 South Carolina NavyCharlestonNuclear Power Operational Training Facility73,93273,932 Virginia NavyDam NeckAerial Target Operation Consolidation10,58710,587 NavyNorfolkPier 11 Power Upgrades for Cvn–783,3803,380 NavyQuanticoAcademic Instruction Facility Tecom Schools25,73125,731 NavyQuanticoAtc Transmitter/Receiver Relocation3,6303,630 NavyQuanticoFuller Road Improvements9,0139,013 NavyYorktownSmall Arms Ranges18,70018,700 Washington NavyBremertonIntegrated Water Treatment Sys Dry Docks 3&418,18918,189 NavyKitsapExplosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc)24,88024,880 NavyWhidbey IslandEa–18g Facility Improvements32,48232,482 NavyWhidbey IslandP–8a Hangar and Training Facilities85,16785,167 Djibouti NavyCamp LemonierArmory6,4206,420 NavyCamp LemonierUnaccompanied Housing22,58022,580 Japan NavyCamp ButlerAirfield Security Upgrades5,8205,820 NavyYokosukaCommunication System Upgrade7,5687,568 Worldwide Unspecified NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMcon Design Funds89,83089,830 NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction19,74019,740 Total Military Construction, Navy1,700,2691,700,269 Arizona AFLuke AFBF–35 Field Training Detachment5,5005,500 AFLuke AFBF–35 Sq Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit #321,40021,400 California AFBeale AFBDistributed Common Ground Station Ops Bldg62,00062,000 Florida AFTyndall AFBF–22 Munitions Storage Complex9,1009,100 Guam AFJoint Region MarianasPar—Fuel Sys Hardened Bldgs20,00020,000 AFJoint Region MarianasPar—Strike Tactical Missile Mxs Facility10,53010,530 AFJoint Region MarianasPar—Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/AMU/Sqd Ops132,600132,600 AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc Red Horse Airfield Operations Facility8,5008,500 AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc Sf Fire Rescue & Emergency Mgt4,6004,600 Hawaii AFJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamC–17 Modernize Hgr 35, Docks 1&24,8004,800 Kansas AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a 2–Bay Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Hangar082,000 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar080,000 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Aircraft Parking Apron Alteration02,200 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Aprons Fuels Distribution System012,800 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Flight Simulator Facility Phase 102,150 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a General Maintenance Hangar032,000 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Miscellaneous Facilities Alteration0970 AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Pipeline Student Dormatory07,000 Kentucky AFFort Campbell19th Air Support Operations Sqdrn Expansion8,0008,000 Maryland AFFort MeadeCybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 185,00085,000 AFJoint Base AndrewsHelicopter Operations Facility30,00030,000 Missouri AFWhiteman AFBWsa Mop Igloos and Assembly Facility5,9005,900 Nebraska AFOffutt AFBUsstratcom Replacement Facility, Incr 3136,000136,000 Nevada AFNellis AFBAdd Rpa Weapons School Facility20,00020,000 AFNellis AFBDormitory (240 Rm)35,00035,000 AFNellis AFBF–35 Alt Mission Equip (Ame) Storage5,0005,000 AFNellis AFBF–35 Fuel Cell Hangar9,4009,400 AFNellis AFBF–35 Parts Store9,1009,100 New Mexico AFCannon AFBAirmen and Family Readiness Center5,5005,500 AFCannon AFBDormitory (144 Rm)22,00022,000 AFCannon AFBSatellite Dining Facility6,6006,600 AFHolloman AFBF–16 Aircraft Covered Washrack and Pad2,2502,250 AFKirtland AFBNuclear Systems Wing & Sustainment Center (Ph30,50030,500 North Dakota AFMinot AFBB–52 Adal Aircraft Maintenance Unit15,53015,530 AFMinot AFBB–52 Munitions Storage Igloos8,3008,300 Oklahoma AFAltus AFBKC–46a Ftu Adal Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock03,350 AFAltus AFBKC–46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/AMU07,400 AFAltus AFBKC–46a Ftu Flight Training Center Simulators Facility Phase 1012,600 AFAltus AFBKC–46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer Phase 106,300 AFAltus AFBKC–46a Ftu Renovate Facility01,200 AFTinker AFBKC–46a Land Acquisition8,6008,600 Texas AFFort BlissF–16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft Arresting System3,3503,350 Utah AFHill AFBF–35 Aircraft Mx Unit Hangar 45e Ops #113,50013,500 AFHill AFBFire Crash Rescue Station18,50018,500 Virginia AFJoint Base Langley-Eustis4–Bay Conventional Munitions Inspection Bldg4,8004,800 Greenland AFThule AbThule Consolidation, Phase 243,90443,904 Mariana Islands AFSaipanPar—Airport Pol/Bulk Storage Ast18,50018,500 AFSaipanPar—Hazardous Cargo Pad8,0008,000 AFSaipanPar—Maintenance Facility2,8002,800 United Kingdom AFCroughton RafMain Gate Complex12,0000 AFRoyal Air Force LakenheathGuardian Angel Operations Facility22,04722,047 Worldwide Unspecified AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsKC–46a Ftu Facility Projects63,0000 AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsKC–46a Mob #1 Facility Projects192,7000 AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning & Design11,31411,314 AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction20,44820,448 Total Military Construction, Air Force1,156,5731,138,843 Alaska Def-WideClear AFSBmds Upgrade Early Warning Radar17,20417,204 Def-WideFort GreelyMechanical-Electrical Bldg Missile Field #182,00082,000 California Def-WideBrawleySOF Desert Warfare Training Center23,09523,095 Def-WideDefense Distribution Depot-TracyGeneral Purpose Warehouse37,55437,554 Def-WideMiramarReplace Fuel Pipeline6,0006,000 Colorado Def-WideFort CarsonSOF Group Support Battalion22,28222,282 Florida Def-WideHurlburt FieldSOF Add/Alter Operations Facility7,9007,900 Def-WideJacksonvilleReplace Fuel Pipeline7,5007,500 Def-WideKey WestSOF Boat Docks3,6000 Def-WidePanama CityReplace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility2,6002,600 Def-WideTyndall AFBReplace Fuel Pipeline9,5009,500 Georgia Def-WideFort BenningFaith Middle School Addition6,0316,031 Def-WideFort BenningWhite Elemtary School Replacement37,30437,304 Def-WideFort StewartDiamond Elementary School Replacement44,50444,504 Def-WideHunter Army AirfieldReplace Fuel Island13,50013,500 Def-WideMoody AFBReplace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility3,8003,800 Hawaii Def-WideFord IslandDISA Pacific Facility Upgrades2,6152,615 Def-WideJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamAlter Warehouse Space2,8002,800 Kentucky Def-WideFort CampbellFort Campbell High School Replacement59,27859,278 Def-WideFort CampbellMarshall Elementary School Replacement38,59138,591 Def-WideFort CampbellSOF Group Special Troops Battalion26,34226,342 Def-WideFort KnoxAmbulatory Health Center265,000265,000 Def-WideFort KnoxConsolidate/Replace Van Voorhis-Mudge Es38,02338,023 Maryland Def-WideAberdeen Proving GroundPublic Health Command Lab Replacement210,000110,000 Def-WideBethesda Naval HospitalMech & Electrical Improvements46,80046,800 Def-WideBethesda Naval HospitalParking Garage20,00020,000 Def-WideFort DetrickUSAMRIID Replacement Stage 1, Incr 813,0000 Def-WideFort MeadeHigh Performance Computing Capacity Inc 3431,000431,000 Def-WideFort MeadeNSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 258,00058,000 Def-WideJoint Base AndrewsAmbulatory Care Center Inc 276,20063,800 Massachusetts Def-WideHanscom AFBHanscom Primary School Replacement36,21336,213 New Jersey Def-WideJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstReplace Fuel Distribution Components10,00010,000 New Mexico Def-WideHolloman AFBMedical Clinic Replacement60,00060,000 Def-WideHolloman AFBReplace Hydrant Fuel System21,40021,400 North Carolina Def-WideCamp LejeuneSOF Performance Resiliency Center14,4000 Def-WideCamp LejeuneSOF Sustainment Training Complex28,97728,977 Def-WideFort BraggConsolidate/Replace Pope Holbrook Elementary37,03237,032 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Civil Affairs Battalion Annex37,68937,689 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Combat Medic Skills Sustain. Course Bldg7,6007,600 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Engineer Training Facility10,41910,419 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Language and Cultural Center64,60664,606 Def-WideFort BraggSOF Upgrade Training Facility14,71914,719 North Dakota Def-WideMinot AFBReplace Fuel Pipeline6,4006,400 Oklahoma Def-WideAltus AFBReplace Refueler Parking2,1002,100 Def-WideTinker AFBReplace Fuel Distribution Facilities36,00036,000 Pennsylvania Def-WideDef Distribution Depot New CumberlandUpgrade Hazardous Material Warehouse3,1003,100 Def-WideDef Distribution Depot New CumberlandUpgrade Public Safety Facility5,9005,900 South Carolina Def-WideBeaufortBolden Elementary/Middle School Replacement41,32441,324 Tennessee Def-WideArnold Air Force BaseReplace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility2,2002,200 Texas Def-WideFort BlissHospital Replacement Incr 5252,100152,100 Def-WideJoint Base San AntonioSammc Hyperbaric Facility Addition12,60012,600 Virginia Def-WideDam NeckSOF Human Performance Center11,1470 Def-WideDef Distribution Depot RichmondOperations Center Phase 187,00087,000 Def-WideJoint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—StorySOF Logsu Two Operations Facility30,40430,404 Def-WidePentagonBoundary Channel Access Control Point6,7006,700 Def-WidePentagonPentagon South Pedestrian Safety Project1,8501,850 Def-WidePentagonPfpa Support Operations Center14,80014,800 Def-WidePentagonRaven Rock Administrative Facility Upgrade32,00032,000 Def-WidePentagonRaven Rock Exterior Cooling Tower4,1004,100 Def-WideQuanticoQuantico Middle/High School Replacement40,58640,586 Washington Def-WideWhidbey IslandReplace Fuel Pier Breakwater10,00010,000 Worldwide Classified Def-WideClassified Locationan/Tpy–2 Radar Site15,00015,000 Bahrain Island Def-WideSw AsiaMedical/Dental Clinic Replacement45,40045,400 Belgium Def-WideBrusselsNATO Headquarters Facility38,51338,513 Def-WideBrusselsNATO Headquarters Fit-Out29,10029,100 Germany Def-WideKaiserlautern AbKaiserslautern Elementary School Replacement49,90749,907 Def-WideRamstein AbRamstein High School Replacement98,76298,762 Def-WideRhine Ordnance BarracksMedical Center Replacement, Incr 3151,545151,545 Def-WideWeisbadenHainerberg Elementary School Replacement58,89958,899 Def-WideWeisbadenWiesbaden Middle School Replacement50,75650,756 Japan Def-WideAtsugiReplace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility4,1004,100 Def-WideIwakuniConstruct Hydrant Fuel System34,00034,000 Def-WideKadena AbKadena Middle School Addition/Renovation38,79238,792 Def-WideTorri Commo StationSOF Facility Augmentation71,45164,071 Def-WideYokosukaUpgrade Fuel Pumps10,60010,600 Korea Def-WideCamp WalkerDaegu Middle/High School Replacement52,16452,164 Romania Def-WideDeveseluAegis Ashore Missile Def Sys Cmplx, Increm. 285,00080,000 United Kingdom Def-WideRaf MildenhallReplace Fuel Storage17,73217,732 Def-WideRaf MildenhallSOF Airfield Pavements and Hangar/AMU048,448 Def-WideRaf MildenhallSOF Airfiled Pavements24,0770 Def-WideRaf MildenhallSOF Hangar/AMU24,3710 Def-WideRaf MildenhallSOF Mrsp and Parts Storage6,7976,797 Def-WideRaf MildenhallSOF Squadron Operations Facility11,65211,652 Def-WideRoyal Air Force LakenheathLakenheath High School Replacement69,63869,638 Worldwide Unspecified Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsContingency Construction10,0000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsEnergy Conservation Investment Program150,000150,000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsExercise Related Minor Construction9,7309,730 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning & Design10,89110,891 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design57,05357,053 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design50,19250,192 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design75,90575,905 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design36,86636,866 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design6,9316,931 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction9,5789,578 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction5,1705,170 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction1,5001,500 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction2,0002,000 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction5,4095,409 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction7,4307,430 Def-WideUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction3,0003,000 Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide3,985,3003,708,373 Kentucky Chem DemilBlue Grass Army DepotAmmunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph Xiv122,536122,536 Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense122,536122,536 Worldwide Unspecified NATONATO Security Investment ProgramNATO Security Investment Program239,700199,700 Total NATO Security Investment Program239,700199,700 Alabama Army NGDecaturNational Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt4,0004,000 Arkansas Army NGFort ChaffeeScout/Recce Gunnery Complex21,00021,000 Florida Army NGPinellas ParkReady Building5,7005,700 Illinois Army NGKankakeeAircraft Maintenance Hangar28,00028,000 Army NGKankakeeReadiness Center14,00014,000 Massachusetts Army NGCamp EdwardsEnlisted Barracks, Transient Training Add19,00019,000 Michigan Army NGCamp GraylingEnlisted Barracks, Transient Training17,00017,000 Minnesota Army NGStillwaterReadiness Center17,00017,000 Mississippi Army NGCamp ShelbyWater Supply/Treatment Building, Potable3,0003,000 Army NGPascagoulaReadiness Center4,5004,500 Missouri Army NGMaconVehicle Maintenance Shop9,1009,100 Army NGWhiteman AFBAircraft Maintenance Hangar5,0005,000 New York Army NGNew YorkReadiness Center Add/Alt31,00031,000 Ohio Army NGRavenna Army Ammunition PlantSanitary Sewer5,2005,200 Pennsylvania Army NGFort Indiantown GapAircraft Maintenance Instructional Building40,00040,000 Puerto Rico Army NGCamp SantiagoManeuver Area Training & Equipment Site Addit5,6005,600 South Carolina Army NGGreenvilleReadiness Center13,00013,000 Army NGGreenvilleVehicle Maintenance Shop13,00013,000 Texas Army NGFort WorthArmed Forces Reserve Center Add14,27014,270 Wyoming Army NGAftonNational Guard Readiness Center10,20010,200 Worldwide Unspecified Army NGUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design29,00524,005 Army NGUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction12,24012,240 Total Military Construction, Army National Guard320,815315,815 California Army ResCamp ParksArmy Reserve Center17,50017,500 Army ResFort Hunter LiggettTass Training Center (Ttc)16,50016,500 Maryland Army ResBowieArmy Reserve Center25,50025,500 New Jersey Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstAutomated Multipurpose Machine Gun (Mpmg)9,5009,500 Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstCentral Issue Facility7,9007,900 Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstConsolidated Dining Facility13,40013,400 Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstModified Record Fire Range5,4005,400 New York Army ResBullvilleArmy Reserve Center14,50014,500 North Carolina Army ResFort BraggArmy Reserve Center24,50024,500 Wisconsin Army ResFort MccoyAccess Control Point/Mail/Freight Center17,50017,500 Army ResFort MccoyNco Academy Dining Facility5,9005,900 Worldwide Unspecified Army ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design14,21214,212 Army ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction1,7481,748 Total Military Construction, Army Reserve174,060174,060 California N/MC ResMarch AFBNOSC Moreno Valley Reserve Training Center11,08611,086 Missouri N/MC ResKansas CityReserve Training Center—Belton, Missouri15,02015,020 Tennessee N/MC ResMemphisReserve Boat Maintenance and Storage Facility4,3304,330 Worldwide Unspecified N/MC ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMcnr Planning & Design1,5001,500 N/MC ResUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUsmcr Planning and Design1,0401,040 Total Military Construction, Naval Reserve32,97632,976 Alabama Air NGBirmingham IAPAdd to and Alter Distributed Ground Station F8,5008,500 Indiana Air NGHulman Regional AirportAdd/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist Common Ground Sta7,3007,300 Maryland Air NGFort Meade175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility4,0000 Air NGMartin State AirportCyber/ISR Facility8,0000 Montana Air NGGreat Falls IAPIntra-Theater Airlift Conversion22,00022,000 New York Air NGFort DrumMq–9 Flight Training Unit Hangar4,7004,700 Ohio Air NGSpringfield Beckley-MapAlter Intelligence Operations Facility7,2007,200 Pennsylvania Air NGFort Indiantown GapCommunications Operations and Training Facili7,7007,700 Rhode Island Air NGQuonset State AirportC–130J Flight Simulator Training Facility6,0006,000 Tennessee Air NGMcghee-Tyson AirportTec Expansion- Dormitory & Classroom Facility18,00018,000 Worldwide Unspecified Air NGVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design13,40013,400 Air NGVarious Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction13,00013,000 Total Military Construction, Air National Guard119,800107,800 California AF ResMarch AFBJoint Regional Deployment Processing Center,19,90019,900 Florida AF ResHomestead AFSEntry Control Complex9,8009,800 Oklahoma AF ResTinker AFBAir Control Group Squadron Operations12,20012,200 Worldwide Unspecified AF ResVarious Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design2,2292,229 AF ResVarious Worldwide LocationsUnspecified Minor Construction1,5301,530 Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve45,65945,659 Wisconsin FH Con ArmyFort MccoyFamily Housing New Construction (56 Units)23,00023,000 Germany FH Con ArmySouth Camp VilseckFamily Housing New Construction (29 Units)16,60016,600 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFamily Housing P & D4,4084,408 Total Family Housing Construction, Army44,00844,008 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings33,12533,125 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeased Housing180,924180,924 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property Facilities107,639107,639 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account54,43354,433 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMilitary Housing Privitization Initiative25,66125,661 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous646646 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices13,53613,536 FH Ops ArmyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities96,90796,907 Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army512,871512,871 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsImprovements72,09372,093 FH Con AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPlanning and Design4,2674,267 Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force76,36076,360 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account39,47039,470 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsHousing Privatization41,43641,436 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing54,51454,514 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance (Rpma Rpmc)110,786110,786 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account53,04453,044 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous Account1,9541,954 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account16,86216,862 FH Ops AFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account70,53270,532 Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force388,598388,598 Worldwide Unspecified FH Con NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDesign4,4384,438 FH Con NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsImprovements68,96968,969 Total Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps73,40773,407 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account21,07321,073 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing74,96274,962 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property90,12290,122 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account60,78260,782 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMiscellaneous Account362362 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrivatization Support Costs27,63427,634 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account20,59620,596 FH Ops NavyUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account94,31394,313 Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine Corps389,844389,844 Worldwide Unspecified FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account3,1963,196 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account6767 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFurnishings Account2020 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing10,99410,994 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsLeasing40,43340,433 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property311311 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsMaintenance of Real Property7474 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsManagement Account418418 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsServices Account3232 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account288288 FH Ops DWUnspecified Worldwide LocationsUtilities Account1212 Total Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide55,84555,845 Worldwide Unspecified FHIFUnspecified Worldwide LocationsFamily Housing Improvement Fund1,7801,780 Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund1,7801,780 Worldwide Unspecified BRACBase Realignment & Closure, ArmyBase Realignment and Closure180,401180,401 BRACBase Realignment & Closure, NavyBase Realignment & Closure108,300108,300 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDod BRAC Activities—Air Force126,376126,376 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–100: Planing, Design and Management7,2777,277 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–101: Various Locations20,98820,988 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–138: NAS Brunswick, ME993993 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO4040 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA5,7665,766 BRACUnspecified Worldwide LocationsDon–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap1,2161,216 Total Base Realignment and Closure—Army451,357451,357 Worldwide Unspecified PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—ANG Unspecified Minor Construction0–45,623 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Army Bid Savings0–14,000 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Army Planning and Design Fy120–50,000 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Defense Wide Bid Savings0–358,400 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Defense Wide Unspecified Minor Construction0–16,470 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Navy Bid Savings0–49,920 PYSUnspecified Worldwide LocationsPrior Year Savings—Section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, AS Amended0–50,000 Total Prior Year Savings0–584,413 Total Military Construction11,011,63310,055,563 XLVII DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 4701. Department of energy national security programs SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) ProgramFY 2014 RequestHouse Authorized Discretionary Summary By Appropriation Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: Energy Programs Electricity delivery and energy reliability16,0000 Nuclear Energy94,00094,000 Atomic Energy Defense Activities National nuclear security administration: Weapons activities7,868,4098,088,409 Defense nuclear nonproliferation2,140,1422,140,142 Naval reactors1,246,1341,246,134 Office of the administrator397,784389,784 Total, National nuclear security administration11,652,46911,864,469 Environmental and other defense activities: Defense environmental cleanup5,316,9094,958,909 Other defense activities749,080749,080 Total, Environmental & other defense activities6,065,9895,707,989 Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities17,718,45817,572,458 Total, Discretionary Funding17,828,45817,666,458 Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability Infrastructure security & energy restoration (HS)16,0000 Nuclear Energy Idaho sitewide safeguards and security94,00094,000 Weapons Activities Life extension programs and major alterations B61 Life extension program537,044581,044 W76 Life extension program235,382245,082 W78/88–1 Life extension program72,69178,291 W88 ALT 370169,487169,487 Total, Stockpile assessment and design1,014,6041,073,904 Stockpile systems B61 Stockpile systems83,53683,536 W76 Stockpile systems47,18747,187 W78 Stockpile systems54,38154,381 W80 Stockpile systems50,33050,330 B83 Stockpile systems54,94860,948 W87 Stockpile systems101,506101,506 W88 Stockpile systems62,60062,600 Total, Stockpile systems454,488460,488 Weapons dismantlement and disposition Operations and maintenance49,26449,264 Stockpile services Production support321,416351,016 Research and development support26,34929,549 R&D certification and safety191,259209,559 Management, technology, and production214,187214,187 Plutonium sustainment156,949166,449 Total, Stockpile services910,160970,760 Total, Directed stockpile work2,428,5162,554,416 Campaigns: Science campaign Advanced certification54,73054,730 Primary assessment technologies109,231109,231 Dynamic materials properties116,965116,965 Advanced radiography30,50930,509 Secondary assessment technologies86,46786,467 Total, Science campaign397,902397,902 Engineering campaign Enhanced surety51,77154,271 Weapon systems engineering assessment technology23,72723,727 Nuclear survivability19,50419,504 Enhanced surveillance54,90958,909 Total, Engineering campaign149,911156,411 Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign Ignition80,24580,245 Support of other stockpile programs15,00115,001 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support59,89759,897 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion5,0245,024 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas8,1988,198 Facility operations and target production232,678232,678 Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign401,043401,043 Advanced simulation and computing campaign564,329564,329 Readiness Campaign Component manufacturing development106,085106,085 Tritium readiness91,69591,695 Total, Readiness campaign197,780197,780 Total, Campaigns1,710,9651,717,465 Nuclear programs Nuclear operations capability265,937265,937 Capabilities based investments39,55839,558 Construction: 12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL26,72226,722 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL30,67930,679 07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL55,71955,719 06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12325,835325,835 Total, Construction438,955438,955 Total, Nuclear programs744,450744,450 Secure transportation asset Operations and equipment122,072122,072 Program direction97,11897,118 Total, Secure transportation asset219,190219,190 Site stewardship Nuclear materials integration17,67917,679 Corporate project management13,01713,017 Minority serving institution partnerships program14,53114,531 Enterprise infrastructure Site Operations1,112,4551,112,455 Site Support109,561109,561 Sustainment433,764498,864 Facilities disposition5,0005,000 Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure1,660,7801,725,880 Total, Site stewardship1,706,0071,771,107 Defense nuclear security Operations and maintenance664,981664,981 Construction: 14–D–710 DAF Argus, NNSS14,00014,000 Total, Defense nuclear security678,981678,981 NNSA CIO activities148,441170,941 Legacy contractor pensions279,597279,597 Subtotal, Weapons activities7,916,1478,136,147 Adjustments Use of prior year balances–47,738–47,738 Total, Adjustments–47,738–47,738 Total, Weapons Activities7,868,4098,088,409 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs Global threat reduction initiative424,487447,487 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D Operations and maintenance388,838388,838 Nonproliferation and international security141,675141,675 International material protection and cooperation369,625346,625 Fissile materials disposition U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition Operations and maintenance U.S. plutonium disposition157,557157,557 U.S. uranium disposition25,00025,000 Total, Operations and maintenance182,557182,557 Construction: 99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC320,000320,000 Total, Construction320,000320,000 Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition502,557502,557 Total, Fissile materials disposition502,557502,557 Legacy contractor pensions93,70393,703 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs1,920,8851,920,885 Nuclear counterterrorism incident response program181,293181,293 Counterterrorism and counterproliferation programs74,66674,666 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation2,176,8442,176,844 Adjustments Use of prior year balances–36,702–36,702 Total, Adjustments–36,702–36,702 Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation2,140,1422,140,142 Naval Reactors Naval reactors operations and infrastructure455,740453,740 Naval reactors development419,400419,400 Ohio replacement reactor systems development126,400126,400 S8G Prototype refueling144,400144,400 Program direction44,40444,404 Construction: 14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL1,0001,000 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF45,40045,400 13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL21,07321,073 13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO6002,600 Naval Reactor Facility, ID1,7001,700 Total, Construction69,77371,773 Subtotal, Naval Reactors1,260,1171,260,117 Adjustments: Use of prior year balances (Naval reactors)–13,983–13,983 Total, Naval Reactors1,246,1341,246,134 Office Of The Administrator Office of the administrator397,784389,784 Total, Office Of The Administrator397,784389,784 Defense Environmental Cleanup Closure sites: Closure sites administration4,7024,702 Hanford site: River corridor and other cleanup operations393,634393,634 Central plateau remediation513,450513,450 Richland community and regulatory support14,70114,701 Total, Hanford site921,785921,785 Idaho National Laboratory: Idaho cleanup and waste disposition362,100362,100 Idaho community and regulatory support2,9102,910 Total, Idaho National Laboratory365,010365,010 NNSA sites Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory1,4761,476 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit23,70023,700 Nevada61,89761,897 Sandia National Laboratories2,8142,814 Los Alamos National Laboratory219,789219,789 Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites309,676309,676 Oak Ridge Reservation: OR Nuclear facility D & D73,71673,716 OR cleanup and disposition115,855115,855 OR reservation community and regulatory support4,3654,365 Total, Oak Ridge Reservation193,936193,936 Office of River Protection: Waste treatment and immobilization plant 01–D–416 A-E/ORP-0060 / Major construction690,000690,000 Tank farm activities Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition520,216520,216 Total, Office of River protection1,210,2161,210,216 Savannah River sites: Savannah River risk management operations432,491432,491 SR community and regulatory support11,21011,210 Radioactive liquid tank waste: Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition552,560647,560 Construction: 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River92,00092,000 Total, Construction92,00092,000 Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste644,560739,560 Total, Savannah River site1,088,2611,183,261 Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Waste isolation pilot plant203,390203,390 Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant203,390203,390 Program direction280,784280,784 Program support17,97917,979 Safeguards and Security: Oak Ridge Reservation18,80018,800 Paducah9,4359,435 Portsmouth8,5788,578 Richland/Hanford Site69,07869,078 Savannah River Site121,196121,196 Waste Isolation Pilot Project4,9774,977 West Valley2,0152,015 Technology development24,09134,091 Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup4,853,9094,958,909 Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution463,0000 Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup5,316,9094,958,909 Other Defense Activities Health, safety and security Health, safety and security143,616143,616 Program direction108,301108,301 Total, Health, safety and security251,917251,917 Specialized security activities196,322196,322 Office of Legacy Management Legacy management163,271163,271 Program direction13,71213,712 Total, Office of Legacy Management176,983176,983 Defense-related activities Defense related administrative support Chief financial officer38,97938,979 Chief information officer79,85779,857 Total, Defense related administrative support118,836118,836 Office of hearings and appeals5,0225,022 Subtotal, Other defense activities749,080749,080 Total, Other Defense Activities749,080749,080 E Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act 5001. Short title This division may be cited as the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act. 5002. Table of contents The table of contents for this division is as follows: Sec. 5001. Short title. Sec. 5002. Table of contents. Sec. 5003. Definitions. Title LI—Management of Information Technology Within Federal Government Sec. 5101. Increased authority of agency Chief Information Officers over information technology. Sec. 5102. Lead coordination role of Chief Information Officers Council. Sec. 5103. Reports by Government Accountability Office. Title LII—Data Center Optimization Sec. 5201. Purpose. Sec. 5202. Definitions. Sec. 5203. Federal data center optimization initiative. Sec. 5204. Performance requirements related to data center consolidation. Sec. 5205. Cost savings related to data center optimization. Sec. 5206. Reporting requirements to Congress and the Federal Chief Information Officer. Title LIII—Elimination of Duplication and Waste in Information Technology Acquisition Sec. 5301. Inventory of information technology assets. Sec. 5302. Website consolidation and transparency. Sec. 5303. Transition to the cloud. Sec. 5304. Elimination of unnecessary duplication of contracts by requiring business case analysis. Title LIV—Strengthening and Streamlining Information Technology Acquisition Management Practices Subtitle A—Strengthening and Streamlining IT Program Management Practices Sec. 5401. Establishment of Federal infrastructure and common application collaboration center. Sec. 5402. Designation of Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence. Subtitle B—Strengthening IT Acquisition Workforce Sec. 5411. Expansion of training and use of information technology acquisition cadres. Sec. 5412. Plan on strengthening program and project management performance. Sec. 5413. Personnel awards for excellence in the acquisition of information systems and information technology. Title LV—Additional Reforms Sec. 5501. Maximizing the benefit of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative. Sec. 5502. Promoting transparency of blanket purchase agreements. Sec. 5503. Additional source selection technique in solicitations. Sec. 5504. Enhanced transparency in information technology investments. Sec. 5505. Enhanced communication between Government and industry. Sec. 5506. Clarification of current law with respect to technology neutrality in acquisition of software. 5003. Definitions In this division: (1) Chief acquisition officers council The term Chief Acquisition Officers Council means the Chief Acquisition Officers Council established by section 1311(a) of title 41, United States Code. (2) Chief information officer The term Chief Information Officer means a Chief Information Officer (as designated under section 3506(a)(2) of title 44, United States Code) of an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code. (3) Chief information officers council The term Chief Information Officers Council or CIO Council means the Chief Information Officers Council established by section 3603(a) of title 44, United States Code. (4) Director The term Director means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (5) Federal agency The term Federal agency means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code. (6) Federal Chief Information Officer The term Federal Chief Information Officer means the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44, United States Code. (7) Information technology or it The term information technology or IT has the meaning provided in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code. (8) Relevant congressional committees The term relevant congressional committees means each of the following: (A) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (B) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. LI Management of Information Technology Within Federal Government 5101. Increased authority of agency Chief Information Officers over information technology (a) Presidential appointment of CIOs of certain agencies (1) In general Section 11315 of title 40, United States Code, is amended— (A) by redesignating subsection (a) as subsection (e) and moving such subsection to the end of the section; and (B) by inserting before subsection (b) the following new subsection (a): (a) Presidential appointment or designation of certain chief information officers (1) In general There shall be within each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) of title 31, other than the Department of Defense, an agency Chief Information Officer. Each agency Chief Information Officer shall— (A) (i) be appointed by the President; or (ii) be designated by the President, in consultation with the head of the agency; and (B) be appointed or designated, as applicable, from among individuals who possess demonstrated ability in general management of, and knowledge of and extensive practical experience in, information technology management practices in large governmental or business entities. (2) Responsibilities An agency Chief Information Officer appointed or designated under this section shall report directly to the head of the agency and carry out, on a full-time basis, responsibilities as set forth in this section and in section 3506(a) of title 44 for Chief Information Officers designated under paragraph (2) of such section. . (2) Conforming amendment Section 3506(a)(2)(A) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by inserting after each agency the following: , other than an agency with a Presidentially appointed or designated Chief Information Officer as provided in section 11315(a)(1) of title 40,. (b) Authority relating to budget and personnel Section 11315 of title 40, United States Code, is further amended by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection: (d) Additional authorities for certain CIOs (1) Budget-related authority (A) Planning The head of each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31, other than the Department of Defense, shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has the authority to participate in decisions regarding the budget planning process related to information technology or programs that include significant information technology components. (B) Allocation Amounts appropriated for any agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31, other than the Department of Defense, for any fiscal year that are available for information technology shall be allocated within the agency, consistent with the provisions of appropriations Acts and budget guidelines and recommendations from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in such manner as may be specified by, or approved by, the Chief Information Officer of the agency in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the agency and budget officials. (2) Personnel-related authority The head of each agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31, other than the Department of Defense, shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has the authority necessary to approve the hiring of personnel who will have information technology responsibilities within the agency and to require that such personnel have the obligation to report to the Chief Information Officer in a manner considered sufficient by the Chief Information Officer. . (c) Single chief information officer in each agency (1) Requirement Section 3506(a)(3) of title 44, United States Code, is amended— (A) by inserting (A) after (3); and (B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: (B) Each agency shall have only one individual with the title and designation of Chief Information Officer. Any bureau, office, or subordinate organization within the agency may designate one individual with the title Deputy Chief Information Officer, Associate Chief Information Officer, or Assistant Chief Information Officer. . (2) Effective date Section 3506(a)(3)(B) of title 44, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall take effect as of October 1, 2014. Any individual serving in a position affected by such section before such date may continue in that position if the requirements of such section are fulfilled with respect to that individual. 5102. Lead coordination role of Chief Information Officers Council (a) Lead coordination role Subsection (d) of section 3603 of title 44, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: (d) Lead interagency forum (1) In general The Council is designated the lead interagency forum for improving agency coordination of practices related to the design, development, modernization, use, operation, sharing, performance, and review of Federal Government information resources investment. As the lead interagency forum, the Council shall develop cross-agency portfolio management practices to allow and encourage the development of cross-agency shared services and shared platforms. The Council shall also issue guidelines and practices for infrastructure and common information technology applications, including expansion of the Federal Enterprise Architecture process if appropriate. The guidelines and practices may address broader transparency, common inputs, common outputs, and outcomes achieved. The guidelines and practices shall be used as a basis for comparing performance across diverse missions and operations in various agencies. (2) Report Not later than December 1 in each of the 6 years following the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Council shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report (to be known as the CIO Council Report) summarizing the Council’s activities in the preceding fiscal year and containing such recommendations for further congressional action to fulfill its mission as the Council considers appropriate. (3) Relevant congressional committees For purposes of the report required by paragraph (2), the relevant congressional committees are each of the following: (A) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (B) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. . (b) Additional function Subsection (f) of section 3603 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (8) Assist the Administrator in developing and providing guidance for effective operations of the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center established under section 11501 of title 40. . (c) References to Administrator of E-Government as Federal Chief Information Officer (1) References Section 3602(b) of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: The Administrator may also be referred to as the Federal Chief Information Officer.. (2) Definition Section 3601(1) of such title is amended by inserting or Federal Chief Information Officer before means. 5103. Reports by Government Accountability Office (a) Requirement to examine effectiveness The Comptroller General of the United States shall examine the effectiveness of the Chief Information Officers Council in meeting its responsibilities under section 3603(d) of title 44, United States Code, as added by section 5102, with particular focus on— (1) whether agencies are actively participating in the Council and heeding the Council’s advice and guidance; and (2) whether the Council is actively using and developing the capabilities of the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center created under section 11501 of title 40, United States Code, as added by section 5401. (b) Reports Not later than 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report containing the findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General from the examination required by subsection (a). LII Data Center Optimization 5201. Purpose The purpose of this title is to optimize Federal data center usage and efficiency. 5202. Definitions In this title: (1) Federal data center optimization initiative The term Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative or the Initiative means the initiative developed and implemented by the Director, through the Federal Chief Information Officer, as required under section 5203. (2) Covered agency The term covered agency means any agency included in the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative. (3) Data center The term data center means a closet, room, floor, or building for the storage, management, and dissemination of data and information, as defined by the Federal Chief Information Officer under guidance issued pursuant to this section. (4) Federal data center The term Federal data center means any data center of a covered agency used or operated by a covered agency, by a contractor of a covered agency, or by another organization on behalf of a covered agency. (5) Server utilization The term server utilization refers to the activity level of a server relative to its maximum activity level, expressed as a percentage. (6) Power usage effectiveness The term power usage effectiveness means the ratio obtained by dividing the total amount of electricity and other power consumed in running a data center by the power consumed by the information and communications technology in the data center. 5203. Federal data center optimization initiative (a) Requirement for initiative The Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, shall develop and implement an initiative, to be known as the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative, to optimize the usage and efficiency of Federal data centers by meeting the requirements of this division and taking additional measures, as appropriate. (b) Requirement for plan Within 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, shall develop and submit to Congress a plan for implementation of the Initiative required by subsection (a) by each covered agency. In developing the plan, the Federal Chief Information Officer shall take into account the findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General review required by section 5205(e). (c) Matters covered The plan shall include— (1) descriptions of how covered agencies will use reductions in floor space, energy use, infrastructure, equipment, applications, personnel, increases in multiorganizational use, server virtualization, cloud computing, and other appropriate methods to meet the requirements of the initiative; and (2) appropriate consideration of shifting Federally owned data centers to commercially owned data centers. 5204. Performance requirements related to data center consolidation (a) Server utilization Each covered agency may use the following methods to achieve the maximum server utilization possible as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer: (1) The closing of existing data centers that lack adequate server utilization, as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer. If the agency fails to close such data centers, the agency shall provide a detailed explanation as to why this data center should remain in use as part of the submitted plan. The Federal Chief Information Officer shall include an assessment of the agency explanation in the annual report to Congress. (2) The consolidation of services within existing data centers to increase server utilization rates. (3) Any other method that the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the chief information officers of covered agencies, determines necessary to optimize server utilization. (b) Power usage effectiveness Each covered agency may use the following methods to achieve the maximum energy efficiency possible as determined by the Federal Chief Information Officer: (1) The use of the measurement of power usage effectiveness to calculate data center energy efficiency. (2) The use of power meters in data centers to frequently measure power consumption over time. (3) The establishment of power usage effectiveness goals for each data center. (4) The adoption of best practices for managing— (A) temperature and airflow in data centers; and (B) power supply efficiency. (5) The implementation of any other method that the Federal Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of covered agencies, determines necessary to optimize data center energy efficiency. 5205. Cost savings related to data center optimization (a) Requirement to track costs (1) In general Each covered agency shall track costs resulting from implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative within the agency and submit a report on those costs annually to the Federal Chief Information Officer. Covered agencies shall determine the net costs from data consolidation on an annual basis. (2) Factors In calculating net costs each year under paragraph (1), a covered agency shall use the following factors: (A) Energy costs. (B) Personnel costs. (C) Real estate costs. (D) Capital expense costs. (E) Maintenance and support costs such as operating subsystem, database, hardware, and software license expense costs. (F) Other appropriate costs, as determined by the agency in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer. (b) Requirement to track savings (1) In general Each covered agency shall track savings resulting from implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative within the agency and submit a report on those savings annually to the Federal Chief Information Officer. Covered agencies shall determine the net savings from data consolidation on an annual basis. (2) Factors In calculating net savings each year under paragraph (1), a covered agency shall use the following factors: (A) Energy savings. (B) Personnel savings. (C) Real estate savings. (D) Capital expense savings. (E) Maintenance and support savings such as operating subsystem, database, hardware, and software license expense savings. (F) Other appropriate savings, as determined by the agency in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer. (c) Requirement to use cost-effective measures Covered agencies shall use the most cost-effective measures to implement the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative. (d) Use of savings Subject to appropriations, any savings resulting from implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative within a covered agency shall be used for the following purposes: (1) To offset the costs of implementing the Initiative within the agency. (2) To further enhance information technology capabilities and services within the agency. (e) Government accountability office review Not later than 3 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall examine methods for calculating savings from the Initiative and using them for the purposes identified in subsection (d), including establishment and use of a special revolving fund that supports data centers and server optimization, and shall submit to the Federal Chief Information Officer and Congress a report on the Comptroller General’s findings and recommendations. 5206. Reporting requirements to Congress and the Federal Chief Information Officer (a) Agency requirement to report to CIO Each year, each covered agency shall submit to the Federal Chief Information Officer a report on the implementation of the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative, including savings resulting from such implementation. The report shall include an update of the agency’s plan for implementing the Initiative. (b) Federal chief information officer requirement to report to congress Each year, the Federal Chief Information Officer shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report that assesses agency progress in carrying out the Federal Data Center Optimization Initiative and updates the plan under section 5203. The report may be included as part of the annual report required under section 3606 of title 44, United States Code. LIII Elimination of Duplication and Waste in Information Technology Acquisition 5301. Inventory of information technology assets (a) Plan The Director shall develop a plan for conducting a Governmentwide inventory of information technology assets. (b) Matters covered The plan required by subsection (a) shall cover the following: (1) The manner in which Federal agencies can achieve the greatest possible economies of scale and cost savings in the procurement of information technology assets, through measures such as reducing hardware or software products or services that are duplicative or overlapping and reducing the procurement of new software licenses until such time as agency needs exceed the number of existing and unused licenses. (2) The capability to conduct ongoing Governmentwide inventories of all existing software licenses on an application-by-application basis, including duplicative, unused, overused, and underused licenses, and to assess the need of agencies for software licenses. (3) A Governmentwide spending analysis to provide knowledge about how much is being spent for software products or services to support decisions for strategic sourcing under the Federal strategic sourcing program managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. (c) Other inventories In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Director shall review the inventory of information systems maintained by each agency under section 3505(c) of title 44, United States Code, and the inventory of information resources maintained by each agency under section 3506(b)(4) of such title. (d) Availability The inventory of information technology assets shall be available to Chief Information Officers and such other Federal officials as the Chief Information Officers may, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, designate. (e) Deadline and submission to congress Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall complete and submit to Congress the plan required by subsection (a). (f) Implementation Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall complete implementation of the plan required by subsection (a). (g) Review by comptroller general Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the plan required by subsection (a) and submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the review. 5302. Website consolidation and transparency (a) Website consolidation The Director shall— (1) in consultation with Federal agencies, and after reviewing the directory of public Federal Government websites of each agency (as required to be established and updated under section 207(f)(3) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–347; 44 U.S.C. 3501 note)), assess all the publicly available websites of Federal agencies to determine whether there are duplicative or overlapping websites; and (2) require Federal agencies to eliminate or consolidate those websites that are duplicative or overlapping. (b) Website transparency The Director shall issue guidance to Federal agencies to ensure that the data on publicly available websites of the agencies are open and accessible to the public. (c) Matters covered In preparing the guidance required by subsection (b), the Director shall— (1) develop guidelines, standards, and best practices for interoperability and transparency; (2) identify interfaces that provide for shared, open solutions on the publicly available websites of the agencies; and (3) ensure that Federal agency Internet home pages, web-based forms, and web-based applications are accessible to individuals with disabilities in conformance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d). (d) Deadline for guidance The guidance required by subsection (b) shall be issued not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 5303. Transition to the cloud (a) Sense of congress It is the sense of Congress that transition to cloud computing offers significant potential benefits for the implementation of Federal information technology projects in terms of flexibility, cost, and operational benefits. (b) Governmentwide application In assessing cloud computing opportunities, the Chief Information Officers Council shall define policies and guidelines for the adoption of Governmentwide programs providing for a standardized approach to security assessment and operational authorization for cloud products and services. (c) Additional budget authorities for transition In transitioning to the cloud, a Chief Information Officer of an agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code, may establish such cloud service Working Capital Funds, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer of the agency, as may be necessary to transition to cloud-based solutions. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, such cloud service Working Capital Funds may preserve funding for cloud service transitions for a period not to exceed 5 years per appropriation. Any establishment of a new Working Capital Fund under this subsection shall be reported to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate and relevant Congressional committees. 5304. Elimination of unnecessary duplication of contracts by requiring business case analysis (a) Purpose The purpose of this section is to leverage the Government’s buying power and achieve administrative efficiencies and cost savings by eliminating unnecessary duplication of contracts. (b) Requirement for business case approval (1) In general Effective on and after 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, an executive agency may not issue a solicitation for a covered contract vehicle unless the agency performs a business case analysis for the contract vehicle and obtains an approval of the business case analysis from the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy. (2) Review of business case analysis (A) In general With respect to any covered contract vehicle, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall review the business case analysis submitted for the contract vehicle and provide an approval or disapproval within 60 days after the date of submission. Any business case analysis not disapproved within such 60-day period is deemed to be approved. (B) Basis for approval of business case The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall approve or disapprove a business case analysis based on the adequacy of the analysis submitted. The Administrator shall give primary consideration to whether an agency has demonstrated a compelling need that cannot be satisfied by existing Governmentwide contract vehicles in a timely and cost-effective manner. (3) Content of business case analysis The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall issue guidance specifying the content for a business case analysis submitted pursuant to this section. At a minimum, the business case analysis shall include details on the administrative resources needed for such contract vehicle, including an analysis of all direct and indirect costs to the Federal Government of awarding and administering such contract vehicle and the impact such contract vehicle will have on the ability of the Federal Government to leverage its purchasing power. (c) Definitions (1) Covered contract vehicle The term covered contract vehicle has the meaning provided by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in guidance issued pursuant to this section and includes, at a minimum, any Governmentwide contract vehicle , whether for acquisition of information technology or other goods or services, in an amount greater than $50,000,000 (or $10,000,000, determined on an average annual basis, in the case of such a contract vehicle performed over more than one year). The term does not include a multiple award schedule contract awarded by the General Services Administration, a Governmentwide acquisition contract for information technology awarded pursuant to sections 11302(e) and 11314(a)(2) of title 40, United States Code, or orders against existing Governmentwide contract vehicles. (2) Governmentwide contract vehicle and executive agency The terms Governmentwide contract vehicle and executive agency have the meanings provided in section 11501 of title 40, United States Code, as added by section 5401. (d) Report Not later than June 1 in each of the next 6 years following the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the implementation of this section, including a summary of the submissions, reviews, approvals, and disapprovals of business case analyses pursuant to this section. (e) Guidance The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall issue guidance for implementing this section. (f) Revision of far Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be amended to implement this section. LIV Strengthening and Streamlining Information Technology Acquisition Management Practices A Strengthening and Streamlining IT Program Management Practices 5401. Establishment of Federal infrastructure and common application collaboration center (a) Establishment (1) In general Chapter 115 of title 40, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 115 Information Technology Acquisition Management Practices Sec. 11501. Federal infrastructure and common application collaboration center. 11501. Federal infrastructure and common application collaboration center (a) Establishment and purposes The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall establish a Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center (hereafter in this section referred to as the Collaboration Center) within the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44 in accordance with this section. The purposes of the Collaboration Center are to serve as a focal point for coordinated program management practices and to develop and maintain requirements for the acquisition of IT infrastructure and common applications commonly used by various Federal agencies. (b) Organization of center (1) Membership The Center shall consist of the following members: (A) An appropriate number, as determined by the CIO Council, but not less than 12, full-time program managers or cost specialists, all of whom have appropriate experience in the private or Government sector in managing or overseeing acquisitions of IT infrastructure and common applications. (B) At least 1 full-time detailee from each of the Federal agencies listed in section 901(b) of title 31, nominated by the respective agency chief information officer for a detail period of not less than 2 years. (2) Working groups The Collaboration Center shall have working groups that specialize in IT infrastructure and common applications identified by the CIO Council. Each working group shall be headed by a separate dedicated program manager appointed by the Federal Chief Information Officer. (c) Capabilities and functions of the collaboration center For each of the IT infrastructure and common application areas identified by the CIO Council, the Collaboration Center shall perform the following roles, and any other functions as directed by the Federal Chief Information Officer: (1) Develop, maintain, and disseminate requirements suitable to establish contracts that will meet the common and general needs of various Federal agencies as determined by the Center. In doing so, the Center shall give maximum consideration to the adoption of commercial standards and industry acquisition best practices, including opportunities for shared services, consideration of total cost of ownership, preference for industry-neutral functional specifications leveraging open industry standards and competition, and use of long-term contracts, as appropriate. (2) Develop, maintain, and disseminate reliable cost estimates that are accurate, comprehensive, well-documented, and credible. (3) Lead the review of significant or troubled IT investments or acquisitions as identified by the CIO Council. (4) Provide expert aid to troubled IT investments or acquisitions. (d) Guidance The Director, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, shall issue guidance addressing the scope and operation of the Collaboration Center. The guidance shall require that the Collaboration Center report to the Federal Chief Information Officer. (e) Report to congress (1) In general The Director shall annually submit to the relevant congressional committees a report detailing the organization, staff, and activities of the Collaboration Center, including— (A) a list of IT infrastructure and common applications the Center assisted; (B) an assessment of the Center’s achievement in promoting efficiency, shared services, and elimination of unnecessary Government requirements that are contrary to commercial best practices; and (C) the use and expenditure of amounts in the Fund established under subsection (i). (2) Inclusion in other report The report may be included as part of the annual E-Government status report required under section 3606 of title 44. (f) Improvement of the governmentwide software purchasing program (1) In general The Collaboration Center, in collaboration with the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, the Department of Defense, and the General Services Administration, shall identify and develop a strategic sourcing initiative to enhance Governmentwide acquisition, shared use, and dissemination of software, as well as compliance with end user license agreements. (2) Examination of methods In developing the initiative under paragraph (1), the Collaboration Center shall examine the use of realistic and effective demand aggregation models supported by actual agency commitment to use the models, and supplier relationship management practices, to more effectively govern the Government’s acquisition of information technology. (3) Governmentwide user license agreement The Collaboration Center, in developing the initiative under paragraph (1), shall allow for the purchase of a license agreement that is available for use by all executive agencies as one user to the maximum extent practicable and as appropriate. (g) Guidelines for acquisition of it infrastructure and common applications (1) Guidelines The Collaboration Center shall establish guidelines that, to the maximum extent possible, eliminate inconsistent practices among executive agencies and ensure uniformity and consistency in acquisition processes for IT infrastructure and common applications across the Federal Government. (2) Central website In preparing the guidelines, the Collaboration Center, in consultation with the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, shall offer executive agencies the option of accessing a central website for best practices, templates, and other relevant information. (h) Pricing transparency The Collaboration Center, in collaboration with the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, the Chief Acquisition Officers Council, the General Services Administration, and the Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence, shall compile a price list and catalogue containing current pricing information by vendor for each of its IT infrastructure and common applications categories. The price catalogue shall contain any price provided by a vendor for the same or similar good or service to any executive agency. The catalogue shall be developed in a fashion ensuring that it may be used for pricing comparisons and pricing analysis using standard data formats. The price catalogue shall not be made public, but shall be accessible to executive agencies. (i) Federal it acquisition management improvement fund (1) Establishment and management of fund There is a Federal IT Acquisition Management Improvement Fund (in this subsection referred to as the Fund). The Administrator of General Services shall manage the Fund through the Collaboration Center to support the activities of the Collaboration Center carried out pursuant to this section. The Administrator of General Services shall consult with the Director in managing the Fund. (2) Credits to fund Five percent of the fees collected by executive agencies under the following contracts shall be credited to the Fund: (A) Governmentwide task and delivery order contracts entered into under sections 4103 and 4105 of title 41. (B) Governmentwide contracts for the acquisition of information technology and multiagency acquisition contracts for that technology authorized by section 11314 of this title. (C) Multiple-award schedule contracts entered into by the Administrator of General Services. (3) Remittance by head of executive agency The head of an executive agency that administers a contract described in paragraph (2) shall remit to the General Services Administration the amount required to be credited to the Fund with respect to the contract at the end of each quarter of the fiscal year. (4) Amounts not to be used for other purposes The Administrator of General Services, through the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure that amounts collected under this subsection are not used for a purpose other than the activities of the Collaboration Center carried out pursuant to this section. (5) Availability of amounts Amounts credited to the Fund remain available to be expended only in the fiscal year for which they are credited and the 4 succeeding fiscal years. (j) Definitions In this section: (1) Executive agency The term executive agency has the meaning provided that term by section 105 of title 5. (2) Federal Chief Information Officer The term Federal Chief Information Officer means the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44. (3) Governmentwide contract vehicle The term Governmentwide contract vehicle means any contract, blanket purchase agreement, or other contractual instrument that allows for an indefinite number of orders to be placed within the contract, agreement, or instrument, and that is established by one executive agency for use by multiple executive agencies to obtain supplies and services. (4) Relevant congressional committees The term relevant congressional committees means each of the following: (A) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (B) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. (k) Revision of far The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be amended to implement this section. . (2) Clerical amendment The item relating to chapter 115 in the table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle III of title 40, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 115.Information Technology Acquisition Management Practices 11501 . (b) Deadlines (1) Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall issue guidance under section 11501(d) of title 40, United States Code, as added by subsection (a). (2) Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall establish the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center, in accordance with section 11501(a) of such title, as so added. (3) Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center shall— (A) identify and develop a strategic sourcing initiative in accordance with section 11501(f) of such title, as so added; and (B) establish guidelines in accordance with section 11501(g) of such title, as so added. (c) Conforming amendment Section 3602(c) of title 44, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking and at the end of paragraph (2); (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): (3) all of the functions of the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center, as required under section 11501 of title 40; and . 5402. Designation of Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence (a) Designation Chapter 115 of title 40, United States Code, as amended by section 5401, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section: 11502. Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence (a) Purpose The purpose of this section is to develop specialized assisted acquisition centers of excellence within the Federal Government to promote— (1) the effective use of best acquisition practices; (2) the development of specialized expertise in the acquisition of information technology; and (3) Governmentwide sharing of acquisition capability to augment any shortage in the information technology acquisition workforce. (b) Designation of AACEs Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, and every 3 years thereafter, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Chief Acquisition Officers Council and the Chief Information Officers Council, shall designate, redesignate, or withdraw the designation of acquisition centers of excellence within various executive agencies to carry out the functions set forth in subsection (c) in an area of specialized acquisition expertise as determined by the Director. Each such center of excellence shall be known as an Assisted Acquisition Center of Excellence or an AACE. (c) Functions The functions of each AACE are as follows: (1) Best practices To promote, develop, and implement the use of best acquisition practices in the area of specialized acquisition expertise that the AACE is designated to carry out by the Director under subsection (b). (2) Assisted acquisitions To assist all Government agencies in the expedient and low-cost acquisition of the information technology goods or services covered by such area of specialized acquisition expertise by engaging in repeated and frequent acquisition of similar information technology requirements. (3) Development and training of it acquisition workforce To assist in recruiting and training IT acquisition cadres (referred to in section 1704(j) of title 41). (d) Criteria In designating, redesignating, or withdrawing the designation of an AACE, the Director shall consider, at a minimum, the following matters: (1) The subject matter expertise of the host agency in a specific area of information technology acquisition. (2) For acquisitions of IT infrastructure and common applications covered by the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center established under section 11501 of this title, the ability and willingness to collaborate with the Collaboration Center and adhere to the requirements standards established by the Collaboration Center. (3) The ability of an AACE to develop customized requirements documents that meet the needs of executive agencies as well as the current industry standards and commercial best practices. (4) The ability of an AACE to consistently award and manage various contracts, task or delivery orders, and other acquisition arrangements in a timely, cost-effective, and compliant manner. (5) The ability of an AACE to aggregate demands from multiple executive agencies for similar information technology goods or services and fulfill those demands in one acquisition. (6) The ability of an AACE to acquire innovative or emerging commercial and noncommercial technologies using various contracting methods, including ways to lower the entry barriers for small businesses with limited Government contracting experiences. (7) The ability of an AACE to maximize commercial item acquisition, effectively manage high-risk contract types, increase competition, promote small business participation, and maximize use of available Governmentwide contract vehicles. (8) The existence of an in-house cost estimating group with expertise to consistently develop reliable cost estimates that are accurate, comprehensive, well-documented, and credible. (9) The ability of an AACE to employ best practices and educate requesting agencies, to the maximum extent practicable, regarding critical factors underlying successful major IT acquisitions, including the following factors: (A) Active engagement by program officials with stakeholders. (B) Possession by program staff of the necessary knowledge and skills. (C) Support of the programs by senior department and agency executives. (D) Involvement by end users and stakeholders in the development of requirements. (E) Participation by end users in testing of system functionality prior to formal end user acceptance testing. (F) Stability and consistency of Government and contractor staff. (G) Prioritization of requirements by program staff. (H) Maintenance of regular communication with the prime contractor by program officials. (I) Receipt of sufficient funding by programs. (10) The ability of an AACE to run an effective acquisition intern program in collaboration with the Federal Acquisition Institute or the Defense Acquisition University. (11) The ability of an AACE to effectively and properly manage fees received for assisted acquisitions pursuant to this section. (e) Funds received by AACEs (1) Availability Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, funds obligated and transferred from an executive agency in a fiscal year to an AACE for the acquisition of goods or services covered by an area of specialized acquisition expertise of an AACE, regardless of whether the requirements are severable or non-severable, shall remain available for awards of contracts by the AACE for the same general requirements for the next 5 fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the funds were transferred. (2) Transition to new aace If the AACE to which the funds are provided under paragraph (1) becomes unable to fulfill the requirements of the executive agency from which the funds were provided, the funds may be provided to a different AACE to fulfill such requirements. The funds so provided shall be used for the same purpose and remain available for the same period of time as applied when provided to the original AACE. (3) Relationship to existing authorities This subsection does not limit any existing authorities an AACE may have under its revolving or working capital funds authorities. (f) Government accountability office review of AACE (1) Review The Comptroller General of the United States shall review and assess— (A) the use and management of fees received by the AACEs pursuant to this section to ensure that an appropriate fee structure is established and enforced to cover activities addressed in this section and that no excess fees are charged or retained; and (B) the effectiveness of the AACEs in achieving the purpose described in subsection (a), including review of contracts. (2) Reports Not later than 1 year after the designation or redesignation of AACES under subsection (b), the Comptroller General shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report containing the findings and assessment under paragraph (1). (g) Definitions In this section: (1) Assisted acquisition The term assisted acquisition means a type of interagency acquisition in which the parties enter into an interagency agreement pursuant to which— (A) the servicing agency performs acquisition activities on the requesting agency’s behalf, such as awarding, administering, or closing out a contract, task order, delivery order, or blanket purchase agreement; and (B) funding is provided through a franchise fund, the Acquisition Services Fund in section 321 of this title, sections 1535 and 1536 of title 31, or other available methods. (2) Executive agency The term executive agency has the meaning provided that term by section 133 of title 41. (3) Relevant congressional committees The term relevant congressional committees has the meaning provided that term by section 11501 of this title. (h) Revision of far The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be amended to implement this section. . (b) Clerical amendment The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 40, United States Code, as amended by section 5401, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item: 11502. Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence. . B Strengthening IT Acquisition Workforce 5411. Expansion of training and use of information technology acquisition cadres (a) Purpose The purpose of this section is to ensure timely progress by Federal agencies toward developing, strengthening, and deploying personnel with highly specialized skills in information technology acquisition, including program and project managers, to be known as information technology acquisition cadres. (b) Report to congress Section 1704 of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: (j) Strategic plan on information technology acquisition cadres (1) Five-year strategic plan to congress Not later than June 1 following the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a 5-year strategic plan (to be known as the IT Acquisition Cadres Strategic Plan) to develop, strengthen, and solidify information technology acquisition cadres. The plan shall include a timeline for implementation of the plan and identification of individuals responsible for specific elements of the plan during the 5-year period covered by the plan. (2) Matters covered The plan shall address, at a minimum, the following matters: (A) Current information technology acquisition staffing challenges in Federal agencies, by previous year’s information technology acquisition value, and by the Federal Government as a whole. (B) The variety and complexity of information technology acquisitions conducted by each Federal agency covered by the plan, and the specialized information technology acquisition workforce needed to effectively carry out such acquisitions. (C) The development of a sustainable funding model to support efforts to hire, retain, and train an information technology acquisition cadre of appropriate size and skill to effectively carry out the acquisition programs of the Federal agencies covered by the plan, including an examination of interagency funding methods and a discussion of how the model of the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund could be applied to civilian agencies. (D) Any strategic human capital planning necessary to hire, retain, and train an information acquisition cadre of appropriate size and skill at each Federal agency covered by the plan. (E) Governmentwide training standards and certification requirements necessary to enhance the mobility and career opportunities of the Federal information technology acquisition cadre within the Federal agencies covered by the plan. (F) New and innovative approaches to workforce development and training, including cross-functional training, rotational development, and assignments both within and outside the Government. (G) Appropriate consideration and alignment with the needs and priorities of the Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center, Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence, and acquisition intern programs. (H) Assessment of the current workforce competency and usage trends in evaluation technique to obtain best value, including proper handling of tradeoffs between price and nonprice factors. (I) Assessment of the current workforce competency in designing and aligning performance goals, life cycle costs, and contract incentives. (J) Assessment of the current workforce competency in avoiding brand-name preference and using industry-neutral functional specifications to leverage open industry standards and competition. (K) Use of integrated program teams, including fully dedicated program managers, for each complex information technology investment. (L) Proper assignment of recognition or accountability to the members of an integrated program team for both individual functional goals and overall program success or failure. (M) The development of a technology fellows program that includes provisions for recruiting, for rotation of assignments, and for partnering directly with universities with well-recognized information technology programs. (N) The capability to properly manage other transaction authority (where such authority is granted), including ensuring that the use of the authority is warranted due to unique technical challenges, rapid adoption of innovative or emerging commercial or noncommercial technologies, or other circumstances that cannot readily be satisfied using a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement in accordance with applicable law and the Federal Acquisition Regulation. (O) The use of student internship and scholarship programs as a talent pool for permanent hires and the use and impact of special hiring authorities and flexibilities to recruit diverse candidates. (P) The assessment of hiring manager satisfaction with the hiring process and hiring outcomes, including satisfaction with the quality of applicants interviewed and hires made. (Q) The assessment of applicant satisfaction with the hiring process, including the clarity of the hiring announcement, the user-friendliness of the application process, communication from the hiring manager or agency regarding application status, and timeliness of the hiring decision. (R) The assessment of new hire satisfaction with the onboarding process, including the orientation process, and investment in training and development for employees during their first year of employment. (S) Any other matters the Director considers appropriate. (3) Annual report Not later than June 1 in each of the 5 years following the year of submission of the plan required by paragraph (1), the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees an annual report outlining the progress made pursuant to the plan. (4) Government accountability office review of the plan and annual report (A) Not later than 1 year after the submission of the plan required by paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the plan and submit to the relevant congressional committees a report on the review. (B) Not later than 6 months after the submission of the first, third, and fifth annual report required under paragraph (3), the Comptroller General shall independently assess the findings of the annual report and brief the relevant congressional committees on the Comptroller General’s findings and recommendations to ensure the objectives of the plan are accomplished. (5) Definitions In this subsection: (A) The term Federal agency means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31. (B) The term relevant congressional committees means each of the following: (i) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. (ii) The Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. . 5412. Plan on strengthening program and project management performance (a) Plan on strengthening program and project management performance Not later than June 1 following the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a plan for improving management of IT programs and projects. (b) Matters covered The plan required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) Creation of a specialized career path for program management. (2) The development of a competency model for program management consistent with the IT project manager model. (3) A career advancement model that requires appropriate expertise and experience for advancement. (4) A career advancement model that is more competitive with the private sector and that recognizes both Government and private sector experience. (5) Appropriate consideration and alignment with the needs and priorities of the Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center, the Assisted Acquisition Centers of Excellence, and acquisition intern programs. (c) Combination with other cadres plan The Director may combine the plan required by subsection (a) with the IT Acquisition Cadres Strategic Plan required under section 1704(j) of title 41, United States Code, as added by section 411. 5413. Personnel awards for excellence in the acquisition of information systems and information technology (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall develop policy and guidance for agencies to develop a program to recognize excellent performance by Federal Government employees and teams of such employees in the acquisition of information systems and information technology for the agency. (b) Elements The program referred to in subsection (a) shall, to the extent practicable— (1) obtain objective outcome measures; and (2) include procedures for— (A) the nomination of Federal Government employees and teams of such employees for eligibility for recognition under the program; and (B) the evaluation of nominations for recognition under the program by 1 or more agency panels of individuals from Government, academia, and the private sector who have such expertise, and are appointed in such a manner, as the Director of the Office of Personal Management shall establish for purposes of the program. (c) Award of cash bonuses and other incentives In carrying out the program referred to in subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall establish policies and guidance for agencies to reward any Federal Government employee or teams of such employees recognized pursuant to the program— (1) with a cash bonus, to the extent that the performance of such individual or team warrants the award of such bonus and is authorized by any provision of law; (2) through promotions and other nonmonetary awards; (3) by publicizing— (A) acquisition accomplishments by individual employees; and (B) the tangible end benefits that resulted from such accomplishments, as appropriate; and (4) through other awards, incentives, or bonuses that the head of the agency considers appropriate. LV Additional Reforms 5501. Maximizing the benefit of the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall prescribe regulations providing that when the Federal Government makes a purchase of services and supplies offered under the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy) but such Initiative is not used, the contract file for the purchase shall include a brief analysis of the comparative value, including price and nonprice factors, between the services and supplies offered under such Initiative and services and supplies offered under the source or sources used for the purchase. 5502. Promoting transparency of blanket purchase agreements (a) Price information to be treated as public information The final negotiated price offered by an awardee of a blanket purchase agreement shall be treated as public information. (b) Publication of blanket purchase agreement information Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall make available to the public a list of all blanket purchase agreements entered into by Federal agencies under its Federal Supply Schedules contracts and the prices associated with those blanket purchase agreements. The list and price information shall be updated at least once every 6 months. 5503. Additional source selection technique in solicitations Section 3306(d) of title 41, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking or at the end of paragraph (1); (2) by striking the period and inserting ; or at the end of paragraph (2); and (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: (3) stating in the solicitation that the award will be made using a fixed price technical competition, under which all offerors compete solely on nonprice factors and the fixed award price is pre-announced in the solicitation. . 5504. Enhanced transparency in information technology investments (a) Public availability of information about it investments Section 11302(c) of title 40, United States Code, is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph: (2) Public availability (A) In general The Director shall make available to the public the cost, schedule, and performance data for at least 80 percent (by dollar value) of all information technology investments Governmentwide, and 60 percent (by dollar value) of all information technology investments in each Federal agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, notwithstanding whether the investments are for new IT acquisitions or for operations and maintenance of existing IT. The Director shall ensure that the information is current, accurate, and reflects the risks associated with each covered information technology investment. (B) Waiver or limitation authority The applicability of subparagraph (A) may be waived or the extent of the information may be limited— (i) by the Director, with respect to IT investments Governmentwide; and (ii) by the Chief Information Officer of a Federal agency, with respect to IT investments in that agency; if the Director or the Chief Information Officer, as the case may be, determines that such a waiver or limitation is in the national security interests of the United States. . (b) Additional report requirements Paragraph (3) of section 11302(c) of such title, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following: The report shall include an analysis of agency trends reflected in the performance risk information required in paragraph (2).. 5505. Enhanced communication between Government and industry Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall prescribe a regulation making clear that agency acquisition personnel are permitted and encouraged to engage in responsible and constructive exchanges with industry, so long as those exchanges are consistent with existing law and regulation and do not promote an unfair competitive advantage to particular firms. 5506. Clarification of current law with respect to technology neutrality in acquisition of software (a) Purpose The purpose of this section is to establish guidance and processes to clarify that software acquisitions by the Federal Government are to be made using merit-based requirements development and evaluation processes that promote procurement choices— (1) based on performance and value, including the long-term value proposition to the Federal Government; (2) free of preconceived preferences based on how technology is developed, licensed, or distributed; and (3) generally including the consideration of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software technologies. (b) Technology neutrality Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify the Federal Government’s long-standing policy of following technology-neutral principles and practices when selecting and acquiring information technology that best fits the needs of the Federal Government. (c) Guidance Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers Council, shall issue guidance concerning the technology-neutral procurement and use of software within the Federal Government. (d) Matters covered In issuing guidance under subsection (c), the Director shall include, at a minimum, the following: (1) Guidance to clarify that the preference for commercial items in section 3307 of title 41, United States Code, includes proprietary, open source, and mixed source software that meets the definition of the term commercial item in section 103 of title 41, United States Code, including all such software that is used for non-Government purposes and is licensed to the public. (2) Guidance regarding the conduct of market research to ensure the inclusion of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software options. (3) Guidance to define Governmentwide standards for security, redistribution, indemnity, and copyright in the acquisition, use, release, and collaborative development of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software. (4) Guidance for the adoption of available commercial practices to acquire proprietary, open source, and mixed source software for widespread Government use, including issues such as security and redistribution rights. (5) Guidance to establish standard service level agreements for maintenance and support for proprietary, open source, and mixed source software products widely adopted by the Government, as well as the development of Governmentwide agreements that contain standard and widely applicable contract provisions for ongoing maintenance and development of software. (6) Guidance on the role and use of the Federal Infrastructure and Common Application Collaboration Center, established pursuant to section 11501 of title 40, United States Code (as added by section 5401), for acquisition of proprietary, open source, and mixed source software. (e) Report to congress Not later than 2 years after the issuance of the guidance required by subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the relevant congressional committees a report containing— (1) an assessment of the effectiveness of the guidance; (2) an identification of barriers to widespread use by the Federal Government of specific software technologies; and (3) such legislative recommendations as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to further the purposes of this section. Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2013. Karen L. Haas, Clerk. July 8, 2013 Read twice and placed on the calendar