Library / Laws / 113th / hr / H.R. 1944 / Reported in House
IB
Union Calendar No. 265
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 1944
[Report No. 113–357]
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 9, 2013
Mr. Sensenbrenner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
February 25, 2014
Additional sponsors: Mr. Chabot and Mr. Simpson
February 25, 2014
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
A BILL
To protect private property rights.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2013.
2.
Prohibition on eminent domain abuse by States
(a)
In General
No State or political subdivision of a State shall exercise its power of eminent domain, or allow
the exercise of such power by any person or entity to which such power has
been delegated, over property to be used for economic development or over
property that is used for economic development within 7 years after that
exercise, if that State or political subdivision receives Federal economic
development funds during any fiscal year in which the property is so used
or intended to be used.
(b)
Ineligibility for Federal Funds
A violation of subsection (a) by a State or political subdivision shall render such State or
political subdivision ineligible for any Federal economic development
funds for a period of 2 fiscal years following a final judgment on the
merits by a court of competent jurisdiction that such subsection has been
violated, and any Federal agency charged with distributing those funds
shall withhold them for such 2-year period, and any such funds distributed
to such State or political subdivision shall be returned or reimbursed by
such State or political subdivision to the appropriate Federal agency or
authority of the Federal Government, or component thereof.
(c)
Opportunity To Cure Violation
A State or political subdivision shall not be ineligible for any Federal economic development funds
under subsection (b) if such State or political subdivision returns all
real property the taking of which was found by a court of competent
jurisdiction to have constituted a violation of subsection (a) and
replaces any other property destroyed and repairs any other property
damaged as a result of such violation. In addition, the State or political
subdivision must pay any applicable penalties and interest to reattain
eligibility.
3.
Prohibition on eminent domain abuse by the Federal Government
The Federal Government or any authority of the Federal Government shall not exercise its power of
eminent domain to be used for economic development.
4.
Private right of action
(a)
Cause of Action
Any
(1) owner of private property whose property is subject to eminent domain who suffers injury as a
result of a violation of any provision of this Act with respect to that
property, or
(2) any tenant of property that is subject to eminent domain who suffers injury as a result of a
violation of any provision of this Act with respect to that property, may
bring an action to enforce any provision of this Act in the appropriate
Federal or State court. A State shall not be immune under the 11th
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States from any such action in
a Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction. In such action, the
defendant has the burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that the
taking is not for economic development. Any such property owner or tenant
may also seek an appropriate relief through a preliminary injunction or a
temporary restraining order.
(b)
Limitation on Bringing Action
An action brought by a property owner or tenant under this Act may be brought if the property is
used for economic development following the conclusion of any condemnation
proceedings condemning the property of such property owner or tenant, but
shall not be brought later than seven years following the conclusion of
any such proceedings.
(c)
Attorneys’ Fee and Other Costs
In any action or proceeding under this Act, the court shall allow a prevailing plaintiff a
reasonable attorneys’ fee as part of the costs, and include expert fees as
part of the attorneys’ fee.
5.
Reporting of violations to Attorney General
(a)
Submission of report to attorney general
Any (1) owner of private property whose property is subject to eminent domain who suffers injury as
a result of a violation of any provision of this Act with respect to that
property, or (2) any tenant of property that is subject to eminent domain
who suffers injury as a result of a violation of any provision of this Act
with respect to that property, may report a violation by the Federal
Government, any authority of the Federal Government, State, or political
subdivision of a State to the Attorney General.
(b)
Investigation by attorney general
Upon receiving a report of an alleged violation, the Attorney General shall conduct an
investigation to determine whether a violation exists.
(c)
Notification of violation
If the Attorney General concludes that a violation does exist, then the Attorney General shall
notify the Federal Government, authority of the Federal Government, State,
or political subdivision of a State that the Attorney General has
determined that it is in violation of the Act. The notification shall
further provide that the Federal Government, State, or political
subdivision of a State has 90 days from the date of the notification to
demonstrate to the Attorney General either that (1) it is not in violation
of the Act or (2) that it has cured its violation by returning all real
property the taking of which the Attorney General finds to have
constituted a violation of the Act and replacing any other property
destroyed and repairing any other property damaged as a result of such
violation.
(d)
Attorney general’s bringing of action To enforce act
If, at the end of the 90-day period described in subsection (c), the Attorney General determines
that the Federal Government, authority of the Federal Government, State,
or political subdivision of a State is still violating the Act or has not
cured its violation as described in subsection (c), then the Attorney
General will bring an action to enforce the Act unless the property owner
or tenant who reported the violation has already brought an action to
enforce the Act. In such a case, the Attorney General shall intervene if
it determines that intervention is necessary in order to enforce the Act.
The Attorney General may file its lawsuit to enforce the Act in the
appropriate Federal or State court. A State shall not be immune under the
11th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States from any such
action in a Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction. In such
action, the defendant has the burden to show by clear and convincing
evidence that the taking is not for economic development. The Attorney
General may seek any appropriate relief through a preliminary injunction
or a temporary restraining order.
(e)
Limitation on bringing action
An action brought by the Attorney General under this Act may be brought if the property is used for
economic development following the conclusion of any condemnation
proceedings condemning the property of an owner or tenant who reports a
violation of the Act to the Attorney General, but shall not be brought
later than seven years following the conclusion of any such proceedings.
(f)
Attorneys’ fee and other costs
In any action or proceeding under this Act brought by the Attorney General, the court shall, if the
Attorney General is a prevailing plaintiff, award the Attorney General a
reasonable attorneys’ fee as part of the costs, and include expert fees as
part of the attorneys’ fee.
6.
Notification by Attorney General
(a)
Notification to States and Political Subdivisions
(1) Not later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall provide to the
chief executive officer of each State the text of this Act and a
description of the rights of property owners and tenants under this Act.
(2) Not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall compile a list
of the Federal laws under which Federal economic development funds are
distributed. The Attorney General shall compile annual revisions of such
list as necessary. Such list and any successive revisions of such list
shall be communicated by the Attorney General to the chief executive
officer of each State and also made available on the Internet website
maintained by the United States Department of Justice for use by the
public and by the authorities in each State and political subdivisions of
each State empowered to take private property and convert it to public use
subject to just compensation for the taking.
(b)
Notification to Property Owners and tenants
Not later than 30 days after the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall publish in the
Federal Register and make available on the Internet website maintained by
the United States Department of Justice a notice containing the text of
this Act and a description of the rights of property owners and tenants
under this Act.
7.
Reports
(a)
By Attorney General
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every subsequent year
thereafter, the Attorney General shall transmit a report identifying
States or political subdivisions that have used eminent domain in
violation of this Act to the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Committee
on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Chairman and
Ranking Member of the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. The report
shall—
(1) identify all private rights of action brought as a result of a State’s or political subdivision’s
violation of this Act;
(2) identify all violations reported by property owners and tenants under section 5(c) of this Act;
(3) identify the percentage of minority residents compared to the surrounding nonminority residents and
the median incomes of those impacted by a violation of this Act;
(4) identify all lawsuits brought by the Attorney General under section 5(d) of this Act;
(5) identify all States or political subdivisions that have lost Federal economic development funds as
a result of a violation of this Act, as well as describe the type and
amount of Federal economic development funds lost in each State or
political subdivision and the Agency that is responsible for withholding
such funds; and
(6) discuss all instances in which a State or political subdivision has cured a violation as described
in section 2(c) of this Act.
(b)
Duty of States
Each State and local authority that is subject to a private right of action under this Act shall
have the duty to report to the Attorney General such information with
respect to such State and local authorities as the Attorney General needs
to make the report required under subsection (a).
8.
Sense of Congress regarding rural America
(a)
Findings
The Congress finds the following:
(1) The founders realized the fundamental importance of property rights when they codified the Takings
Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which requires that
private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation.
(2) Rural lands are unique in that they are not traditionally considered high tax revenue-generating
properties for State and local governments. In addition, farmland and
forest land owners need to have long-term certainty regarding their
property rights in order to make the investment decisions to commit land
to these uses.
(3) Ownership rights in rural land are fundamental building blocks for our Nation’s agriculture
industry, which continues to be one of the most important economic sectors
of our economy.
(4) In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. City of New London, abuse of eminent domain
is a threat to the property rights of all private property owners,
including rural land owners.
(b)
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that the use of eminent domain for the purpose of economic development
is a threat to agricultural and other property in rural America and that
the Congress should protect the property rights of Americans, including
those who reside in rural areas. Property rights are central to liberty in
this country and to our economy. The use of eminent domain to take
farmland and other rural property for economic development threatens
liberty, rural economies, and the economy of the United States. The taking
of farmland and rural property will have a direct impact on existing
irrigation and reclamation projects. Furthermore, the use of eminent
domain to take rural private property for private commercial uses will
force increasing numbers of activities from private property onto this
Nation’s public lands, including its National forests, National parks and
wildlife refuges. This increase can overburden the infrastructure of these
lands, reducing the enjoyment of such lands for all citizens. Americans
should not have to fear the government’s taking their homes, farms, or
businesses to give to other persons. Governments should not abuse the
power of eminent domain to force rural property owners from their land in
order to develop rural land into industrial and commercial property.
Congress has a duty to protect the property rights of rural Americans in
the face of eminent domain abuse.
9.
Sense of Congress
It is the policy of the United States to encourage, support, and promote the private ownership of
property and to ensure that the constitutional and other legal rights of
private property owners are protected by the Federal Government.
10.
Religious and nonprofit organizations
(a)
Prohibition on States
No State or political subdivision of a State shall exercise its power of eminent domain, or allow
the exercise of such power by any person or entity to which such power has
been delegated, over property of a religious or other nonprofit
organization by reason of the nonprofit or tax-exempt status of such
organization, or any quality related thereto if that State or political
subdivision receives Federal economic development funds during any fiscal
year in which it does so.
(b)
Ineligibility for Federal Funds
A violation of subsection (a) by a State or political subdivision shall render such State or
political subdivision ineligible for any Federal economic development
funds for a period of 2 fiscal years following a final judgment on the
merits by a court of competent jurisdiction that such subsection has been
violated, and any Federal agency charged with distributing those funds
shall withhold them for such 2-year period, and any such funds distributed
to such State or political subdivision shall be returned or reimbursed by
such State or political subdivision to the appropriate Federal agency or
authority of the Federal Government, or component thereof.
(c)
Prohibition on Federal Government
The Federal Government or any authority of the Federal Government shall not exercise its power of
eminent domain over property of a religious or other nonprofit
organization by reason of the nonprofit or tax-exempt status of such
organization, or any quality related thereto.
11.
Report by Federal agencies on regulations and procedures relating to eminent domain
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each Executive
department and agency shall review all rules, regulations, and procedures
and report to the Attorney General on the activities of that department or
agency to bring its rules, regulations and procedures into compliance with
this Act.
12.
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that any and all precautions shall be taken by the government to avoid
the unfair or unreasonable taking of property away from survivors of
Hurricane Katrina who own, were bequeathed, or assigned such property, for
economic development purposes or for the private use of others.
13.
Disproportionate impact
If the court determines that a violation of this Act has occurred, and that the violation has a
disproportionately high impact on the poor or minorities, the Attorney
General shall use reasonable efforts to locate former owners and tenants
and inform them of the violation and any remedies they may have.
14.
Definitions
In this Act the following definitions apply:
(1)
Economic development
The term economic development means taking private property, without the consent of the owner, and conveying or leasing such
property from one private person or entity to another private person or
entity for commercial enterprise carried on for profit, or to increase tax
revenue, tax base, employment, or general economic health, except that
such term shall not include—
(A) conveying private property—
(i) to public ownership, such as for a road, hospital, airport, or military base;
(ii) to an entity, such as a common carrier, that makes the property available to the general public as
of right, such as a railroad or public facility;
(iii) for use as a road or other right of way or means, open to the public for transportation, whether
free or by toll; and
(iv) for use as an aqueduct, flood control facility, pipeline, or similar use;
(B) removing harmful uses of land provided such uses constitute an immediate threat to public health
and safety;
(C) leasing property to a private person or entity that occupies an incidental part of public property
or a public facility, such as a retail establishment on the ground floor
of a public building;
(D) acquiring abandoned property;
(E) clearing defective chains of title;
(F) taking private property for use by a utility providing electric, natural gas, telecommunication,
water, wastewater, or other utility services either directly to the public
or indirectly through provision of such services at the wholesale level
for resale to the public; and
(G) redeveloping of a brownfield site as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (42 U.S.C. 9601(39)).
(2)
Federal economic development funds
The term Federal economic development funds means any Federal funds distributed to or through States or political subdivisions of States under
Federal laws designed to improve or increase the size of the economies of
States or political subdivisions of States.
(3)
State
The term State means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or
any other territory or possession of the United States.
15.
Limitation on statutory construction
Nothing in this Act may be construed to supersede, limit, or otherwise affect any provision of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.).
16.
Broad construction
This Act shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of private property rights, to the
maximum extent permitted by the terms of this Act and the Constitution.
17.
Severability and effective date
(a)
Severability
The provisions of this Act are severable. If any provision of this Act, or any application thereof,
is found unconstitutional, that finding shall not affect any provision or
application of the Act not so adjudicated.
(b)
Effective Date
This Act shall take effect upon the first day of the first fiscal year that begins after the date
of the enactment of this Act, but shall not apply to any project for which
condemnation proceedings have been initiated prior to the date of
enactment.
February 25, 2014
Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed