,,iii  #aai? ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,s4 ,,res4 #hbh  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!
 ,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,augu/ #d1 #bjbf,mr4  
,blum5?al submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 
:i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on !       
,judici>y  ,,resolution  ,express+ !    
s5se ( ! ,s5ate t ,presid5t ,trump's    
lawsuit aga9/ ! ,int]nal ,rev5ue        
,s]vice1 ! result+ settlem5t f t        
lawsuit1 ! purport$ ,anti-,weaponization
 ,fund1 & ! puport$ grant ( immunity f  
tax inve/igations to ! pla9tiffs 9      
,presid5t ,trump's lawsuit1 %\ld be     
reject$1 equal protection argum5ts by   
o!rs ) simil> claims %\ld be =e/all$1 & 
?is settlem5t %\ld n s]ve z a prec$5t & 
%\ld nev] be repeat$4  ,:]eas1 betwe5   
#bjai & #bjbj1 an ,int]nal ,rev5ue      
,s]vice 7ref]r$ to 9 ?is preamble z !   
,,irs7 contractor disclos$ ! tax        
in=mation ( hundr$s ( ?\s&s (           
individuals & o!r tax entities1 includ+ 
,presid5t ,donald ,trump2 ,:]eas1 on    
,janu>y #bi1 #bjbf1 ,presid5t ,trump1 8 
sons1 ,eric ,trump & ,donald ,trump1    

,jr41 & ! ,trump ,organization fil$ a   
lawsuit bas$ on ^! disclosures aga9/ !  
,,irs & ! ,dep>tm5t ( ! ,treasury1 bo? (
 :i* ,trump1 z ! sitt+ ,presid5t1       
controls2 ,:]eas ,presid5t ,trump s\ght 
#aj1jjj1jjj1jjj 9 damages 9 8 lawsuit1  
ev5 ?\gh ! o!r individuals :o su$ !     
,f$]al ,gov]nm5t = ! same reason g5]ally
 receiv$ no monet>y comp5sation1 su* z  
,k5ne? ,griff91 :o receiv$ only an      
apology f ! ,,irs2 ,:]eas ,presid5t     
,trump 0 free1 dur+ ! /atute (          
limitations p]iod :5 he 0 a private     
citiz51 to br+ an improp] tax disclosure
 lawsuit seek+ a reasonable rem$y2      
,:]eas ,presid5t ,trump did n pursue ?is
 lawsuit until well aft] ! #b-ye> /atute
 ( limitations p]iod = su* improp] tax  
disclosure claims _h expir$2 ,:]eas1 on 
,may #ah1 #bjbf1 ,presid5t ,trump & !   
,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice t he controls       
ann\nc$ t !y _h agre$ to a purport$     
settlem5t ( ! lawsuit1 "u :i* ! ,f$]al  
,gov]nm5t w\ld e/abli% an               
,anti-,weaponization ,fund to provide   

ne>ly #a1hjj1jjj1jjj 9 taxpay] pay\ts to
 individuals :o ,presid5t ,trump deem$  
to h suff]$ weaponization & lawf>e1     
includ+ riot]s :o /orm$ ! ,capitol &    
attack$ law en=cem5t on ,janu>y #f1     
#bjba2 ,:]eas1 on ,may #ai1 #bjbf1 ! day
 aft] ! ann\ncem5t ( ! settlem5t1 ,act+ 
,attorney ,g5]al ,todd ,blan*e issu$ a  
unilat]al add5dum to ! settlem5t t      
purport$ to immunize ,presid5t ,trump1 8
 family1 8 companies1 & 8 affiliates f  
,,irs inve/igations1 audits1 or claims  
p]ta9+ to any ( _! previ\s tax returns  
or o!r tax-relat$ actions2 ,:]eas our   
,con/itution af=ds all p equal          
protection ( ! laws2 ,:]eas !re is no   
reason t ,presid5t ,trump & ! o!r       
pla9tiffs 9 8 lawsuit are entitl$ to    
special treatm5t diff]5t f o!rs h>m$ 9 !
 same illegal disclosure ( tax          
in=mation2 ,:]eas1 if ! purport$        
settlem5t ) ,presid5t ,trump is all[$ to
 /&1 ! pr9ciple ( equal protection ( !  
laws w\ld give all victims ( ! same     
illegal tax disclosure an argum5t to    

claim ! same immunity ov] retrospective 
tax audit inve/igations ( _! own fil+s2 
,:]eas af=d+ su* immunity to hundr$s (  
?\s&s ( individuals & o!r tax entities  
w\ld likely co/ ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t      
millions1 & p]haps ev5 billions1 (      
doll>s 9 lo/ rev5ue2 ,:]eas !re is no   
cr$ible argum5t t all victims ( !       
illegal disclosure %\ld receive immunity
 cov]+ all retrospective tax audit      
inve/igations2 & ,:]eas ! ,unit$ ,/ates 
,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,s\!rn ,di/rict (    
,florida held t ,presid5t ,trump's      
lawsuit 0 non-adv]s>ial1 collusive1 &   
jurisdictionally improp] & ?us 0 br\ght 
= an improp] purpose because ! ,lead    
,pla9tiff1 ,presid5t ,trump1 directs &  
controls ! ,def5dants1 ! ,,irs1 & !     
,treasury ,dep>tm5t )9 ! executive bran*
 ( :i* he is ! head3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x   
,t x is ! s5se ( ! ,s5ate t ,presid5t   
,trump's lawsuit aga9/ ! ,int]nal       
,rev5ue ,s]vice & ! result+ settlem5t1 !
 purport$ ,anti-,weaponization ,fund1 & 
! purport$ grant ( immunity f tax       

inve/igations to ! pla9tiffs 9 ,presid5t
 ,trump's lawsuit1 %\ld be reject$1     
equal protection argum5ts by o!rs )     
simil> claims %\ld be =e/all$1 & ?is    
settlem5t %\ld n s]ve z a prec$5t & %\ld
 nev] be repeat$4