,,iii #aaith ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #cj ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,march #be1 #bjbf,mr4 ,scott of ,florida 7for himself and ,mr4 ,marshall7 submitted the following concurrent resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,energy and ,natural ,resources ,,concurrent ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of ,congress that the ,ratepayer ,protection ,pledge announced on ,march #d1 #bjbf1 reflects sound national policy to protect ratepayers in the ,united ,states1 promote electricity affordability1 and ensure that all people of the ,united ,states1 including households1 small businesses1 schools1 hospitals1 and farms1 have access to reliable and affordable energy as artificial intelligence and data center infrastructure expands across the ,united ,states4 ,whereas data centers consumed approximately #ahc terawatt-hours of electricity in the ,united ,states in #bjbd1 which is more than #d percent of total national electricity consumption in the ,united ,states2 ,whereas the ,department of ,energy projects that the share of total national electricity consumption in the ,united ,states that is consumed by data centers could reach up to #ab percent by #bjbh as artificial intelligence workloads require continuously operating1 high power density computing infrastructure at unprecedented scale2 ,whereas1 under the traditional utility regulatory model1 the costs of building1 upgrading1 and maintaining the transmission and distribution infrastructure required to service new large industrial loads are socialized across all ratepayers through rate proceedings1 meaning that households and small businesses in the ,united ,states effectively subsidize the electricity infrastructure of some of the most highly capitalized companies in history2 ,whereas1 because data centers cluster geographically rather than diffuse evenly across the electric grid1 the impact of data centers on local electricity rates is acute and uneven2 and ,whereas1 on ,march #d1 #bjbf1 ,amazon1 ,google1 ,meta1 ,microsoft1 ,open,a,i1 ,oracle1 and x,a,i signed the ,ratepayer ,protection ,pledge at the ,white ,house1 committing to negotiate separate rate structures with utilities and ,state governments wherever those signatories build data centers and to pay those rates for generation and delivery infrastructure whether or not the signatories consume the electricity1 establishing a pay-whether-used obligation that1 alongside protecting ratepayers from infrastructure cost-shifting1 creates an incentive for the signatories to make their backup generation resources available to grid operators during scarcity events1 thereby enhancing reliability for all people of the ,united ,states3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that-- 7#a7 it is the ,sense of ,congress that-- 7,a7 the ,ratepayer ,protection ,pledge announced on ,march #d1 #bjbf1 reflects sound national policy founded on the principle that the people of the ,united ,states should not be required to foot the bill for private data center energy and infrastructure costs2 7,b7 the artificial intelligence data center boom in the ,united ,states should be leveraged to address electricity affordability and benefit all households and businesses in the ,united ,states2 and 7,c7 relevant ,federal agencies1 including the ,department of ,energy and the ,federal ,energy ,regulatory ,commission1 should support and facilitate the implementation of the commitments made in the ,ratepayer ,protection ,pledge1 including by working with private companies to expedite the permitting and interconnection of new energy generation resources2 and 7#b7 ,congress encourages additional artificial intelligence companies1 hyperscalers1 data center operators1 and technology firms that have not yet signed the ,ratepayer ,protection ,pledge to voluntarily adopt equivalent commitments without delay4