,,iv  #aai? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #gfc  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,septemb] #bc1        
#bjbe,ms4 ,norton submitt$ ! foll[+     
resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee
 on ,ov]sight & ,gov]nm5t ,re=m         
,,resolution  ,express+ support = !     
designation ( ,septemb] #bjbe z         
,national ,campus ,sexual ,assault      
,aw>5ess ,mon?4  ,:]eas fre%m5 &        
sophomores 9 college are at a great]    
risk ( be+ sexually assault$ ?an juniors
 or s5iors2 ,:]eas college /ud5ts are at
 a high] risk ( sexual assault dur+ !   
fir/ few mon?s ( s*ool1 ) m ?an #ej     
p]c5t ( college sexual assaults occurr+ 
9 ei!r ,augu/1 ,septemb]1 ,octob]1 or   
,novemb]2 ,:]eas _m college /ud5ts are  
survivors ( incapacitat$ assault1 9 :i* 
!y are sexually assault$ :ile drugg$1   
drunk1 pass$ out1 or o!rwise            
incapacitat$2 ,:]eas ^! survivors (t5 "k
 _! attack]s2 ,:]eas less ?an #ab p]c5t 
( rapes & attempt$ rapes ( college      
/ud5ts are report$ to campus au?orities 

or local law en=cem5t2 ,:]eas college   
sexual assault survivors are likely to  
tell someone !y "k1 mo/ (t5 a fri5d1    
ab\t _! exp]i5ce2 ,:]eas #bj p]c5t (    
college sexual assault survivors fe>    
reprisal by ! p]petrator2 ,:]eas _m     
college sexual assault survivors fe>    
poor treatm5t by campus or law en=cem5t 
au?orities1 or ev5 lack k ( ! report+   
process2 ,:]eas #aj p]c5t ( colleges    
/ill d n all[ confid5tial report+ (     
sexual assaults to campus au?orities2   
,:]eas #bb p]c5t ( colleges provide no  
sexual assault response tra9+ = memb]s (
 _! faculty & /aff2 ,:]eas #da p]c5t (  
colleges h n conduct$ a s+le sexual     
assault inve/igation 9 ! la/ #e ye>s2   
,:]eas mo/ colleges fail to provide     
access to a specially tra9$ ,sexual     
,assault ,nurse ,exam9]2 ,:]eas law     
en=cem5t (ficials at #cj p]c5t (        
colleges receive no tra9+ on h[ to      
respond to reports ( sexual viol5ce2    
,:]eas m ?an #gj p]c5t ( colleges d n h 
protocols reg>d+ h[ ! in/itution & local

 law en=cem5t %\ld "w toge!r to respond 
to sexual viol5ce2 ,:]eas #cc p]c5t (   
colleges fail to provide tra9+ to dispel
 rape my?s to p]sons adjudicat+ sexual  
assault claims2 ,:]eas #dc p]c5t ( !    
,nation's l>ge/ colleges h /ud5ts assi/+
 9 adjudicat+ sexual assault cases1 :i* 
creates privacy & conflict-(-int]e/     
conc]ns2 ,:]eas #bb p]c5t ( colleges    
all[ a?letic dep>tm5t ov]sight ( sexual 
viol5ce cases involv+ /ud5t a?letes2    
,:]eas _m college sexual assault        
survivors exp]i5ce confusion ov] h[ to  
report a sexual assault1 are unsure (   
acceptable /&>ds ( sexual conduct &     
def9itions ( rape & sexual assault1 &   
fe> puni%m5t = activities prec$+ "s     
sexual assaults1 su* z und]age dr9k+2   
,:]eas #ba p]c5t ( ! ,nation's l>ge/    
private colleges report n indep5d5tly   
inve/igat+ all claims ( sexual assault t
 !y convey$ to ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,education2
 ,:]eas only #aj to #be p]c5t ( !       
p]petrators ( college sexual assaults   
are p]man5tly expell$2 ,:]eas less ?an  

#g p]c5t ( report$ college rape cases   
result 9 crim9al *>ges aga9/ !          
p]petrator2 ,:]eas survivors ( campus   
sexual assaults are m likely to h _!    
lives disrupt$1 su* z by *ang+ a college
 major1 *ang+ campus h\s+1 & dropp+ a   
class1 ?an ! av]age /ud5t2 ,:]eas #g    
,/ates require colleges to adopt        
affirmative cons5t policies2 & ,:]eas   
,septemb] #bjbe1 :5 _m /ud5ts beg9 or   
return to college1 is an appropriate    
mon? to designate z ,national ,campus   
,sexual ,assault ,aw>5ess ,mon?3 ,n[1   
!re=e1 be x  ,t ! ,h\se (               
,repres5tatives supports ! designation (
 ,national ,campus ,sexual ,assault     
,aw>5ess ,mon?4