,,iv  #aai? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #dae  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,may #ae1 #bjbe,mr4   
,gre5 ( ,texas submitt$ ! foll[+        
resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee
 on ! ,judici>y  ,,resolution  ,impea*+ 
,donald ,john ,trump1 ,presid5t ( !     
,unit$ ,/ates1 ( high crimes &          
misdemeanors4  ,t ,donald ,john ,trump1 
,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 is unfit to
 be ,presid5t1 unfit to repres5t !      
,am]ican values ( dec5cy & morality1    
respectability & civility1 hone/y &     
propriety1 reputability & integrity1 is 
unfit to def5d ! ideals t h made ,am]ica
 great1 is unfit to def5d lib]ty &      
ju/ice = all z extoll$ 9 ! ,pl$ge (     
,allegiance1 is unfit to def5d !        
,am]ican ideal ( all p]sons be+ creat$  
equal z exalt$ 9 ! ,decl>ation (        
,indep5d5ce1 is unfit to ensure dome/ic 
tranquility1 promote ! g5]al welf>e & to
 ensure ! bless+s ( lib]ty to ourselves 
& our po/]ity z laud$ 9 ! preamble to ! 
,unit$ ,/ates ,con/itution1 is unfit to 

protect gov]nm5t ( ! p1 by ! p1 = ! p z 
elucidat$ 9 ! ,gettysburg ,address1 & is
 impea*$ = high crimes & misdemeanors1 t
 ! foll[+ ,article ( ,impea*m5t be      
exhibit$ to ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,s5ate3     
,article ( ,impea*m5t exhibit$ by !     
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$      
,/ates ( ,am]ica1 9 ! "n ( itself1 & ( !
 p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/   
,donald ,john ,trump1 ,presid5t ( !     
,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 9 ma9t5ance &  
support ( its impea*m5t aga9/ him = high
 crimes & misdemeanors committ$ z       
,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates con/itut+   
h>m to ,am]ican society to ! manife/    
injury ( ! p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates (        
,am]ica4  ,,article ,i  ,devolv+        
democracy )9 ! ,unit$ ,/ates into       
au?orit>ianism ) himself 7,donald ,john 
,trump7 z an au?orit>ian ,presid5t4     
,m]riam-,web/] def9es au?orit>ianism z1 
relat+ to1 or favor+ a conc5tration (   
p[] 9 a lead] or an elite n             
con/itutionally responsible to ! p4  ,! 
,con/itution provides t ! ,h\se (       

,repres5tatives 8%all h ! sole ,p[] (   
,impea*m5t0 & t ! ,presid5t %all be     
remov$ f ,(fice on ,impea*m5t =1 &      
,conviction (1 ,treason1 ,brib]y1 or o!r
 high ,crimes & ,misdemeanors4 ,9 8     
conduct :ile ,presid5t ( ! ,unit$       
,/ates--& 9 violation ( 8 con/itutional 
oa? fai?fully to execute ! (fice (      
,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates &1 to ! be/ 
( 8 ability1 pres]ve1 protect1 & def5d !
 ,con/itution ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 & 9    
violation ( 8 con/itutional duty to take
 c>e t ! laws be fai?fully              
execut$--,donald ,john ,trump engag$ 9  
high ,crimes & ,misdemeanors1 caus+ !   
devolution ( democracy )9 ! ,unit$      
,/ates ( ,am]ica into au?orit>ianism )  
himself z an au?orit>ian ,presid5t4     
,e>ly 9 8 campaign1 ,presid5t ,trump    
indicat$ 8 dictatorial_/au?orit>ian     
int5tions4 ,on ,decemb] #e1 #bjbc1 ,fox 
,news air$ a t[n hall int]view ho/$ by  
,sean ,hannity ) !n-c&idate1 ,donald    
,trump1 :]e he 0 ask$1 ,"u no           
circum/ances1 y are promis+ ,am]ica     

tonight1 y w\ld nev] abuse p[] z        
retribution aga9/ anybody1 to :i*1      
,trump repli$1 ,except = day "o4 ,9     
speak+ to ! audi5ce1 ,trump1 ref]r+ to  
,hannity1 said1 ,we love ?is guy4 ,he   
says y're n go+ to be a dictator1 are y8
 ,i said1 no1 no1 no4 ,o!r ?an day "o4  
,we're clos+ ! bord] & we're drill+1    
drill+1 drill+4 ,aft] t1 ,i'm n a       
dictator4 ,okay8  ,un=tunately1         
,presid5t ,trump's au?orit>ianism did n 
end on day "o1 b in/ead cont9u$ ?r\gh   
condon+ ! und]m9+ ( ! judicial          
indep5d5ce ( ! ,f$]al judici>y1         
disreg>d+ ! sep>ation ( p[]s1 violat+ ! 
due process clause 9 ! ,fif? ,am5dm5t ( 
! ,unit$ ,/ates ,con/itution1 d5igrat+  
,f$]al judges1 condon+ ! fl\t+ ( ord]s (
 ,unit$ ,/ates ,f$]al ,c\rts1 includ+   
ord]s ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,supreme ,c\rt1 
9 t3  ,on ,w$nesday1 ,april #af1 #bjbe1 
,james ,e4 ,boasb]g1 ,*ief ,judge ,unit$
 ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict (   
,columbia f\nd t probable cause exi/$ to
 hold ! ,trump ,adm9i/ration def5dants 9

 contempt = a willful disreg>d = its    
ord]4 ,! relevant "p ( ! ,memor&um      
,op9ion /at$ z foll[s3  7#a7 ,on ! ev5+ 
( ,saturday1 ,m>* #ae1 #bjbe1 ?is ,c\rt 
issu$ a writt5 ,tempor>y ,re/ra9+ ,ord] 
,,tro b>r+ ! ,gov]nm5t f transf]r+ c]ta9
 individuals into =eign cu/ody pursuant 
to ! ,ali5 ,enemies ,act4 ,at ! "t !    
,ord] issu$1 ^? individuals 7 on planes 
be+ fl[n ov]seas1 hav+ be5 spirit$ out (
 ! ,unit$ ,/ates by ! ,gov]nm5t be=e !y 
c\ld v9dicate _! due-process rights by  
conte/+ _! removability 9 a ,f$]al c\rt1
 z ! law requires 4 4 4 ,r ?an comply ) 
! ,c\rt's ,ord]1 ! ,gov]nm5t cont9u$ !  
hurri$ removal op]ation4 ,e>ly on       
,sunday morn+--h\rs aft] ! ,ord]        
issu$--x transf]r$ two planeloads (     
pass5g]s protect$ by ! ,,tro into a     
,salvadoran mega-prison4  7#b7 ,z ?is   
,op9ion w detail1 ! ,c\rt ultimately    
det]m9es t ! ,gov]nm5t's actions on t   
day ,m>* #af1 #bjbe demon/rate a willful
 disreg>d = its ,ord]1 suffici5t = !    
,c\rt to conclude t probable cause exi/s

 to f9d ! ,gov]nm5t 9 crim9al contempt4 
,! ,c\rt does n rea* su* conclusion     
lightly or ha/ily2 inde$1 x has giv5    
,def5dants ample opportunity to rectify 
or expla9 _! actions4 ,none ( _!        
responses has be5 satisfactory4  7#c7   
,"o might none!less ask h[ ?is inquiry  
into compliance is able to proce$ at all
 giv5 t ! ,supreme ,c\rt vacat$ ! ,,tro 
aft] ! ev5ts 9 "q4 ,t ,c\rt's lat]      
det]m9ation t ! ,,tro suff]$ f a legal  
defect1 h[ev]1 does n excuse !          
,gov]nm5t's violation4 ,in/ead1 x is a  
f\ndational legal precept t e judicial  
ord] mu/ be obey$--no matt] h[ errone\s 
x may be--until a c\rt rev]ses x4  7#d7 
,if a p>ty *ooses to disobey ! ord]--r  
?an wait = x to be rev]s$ ?r\gh !       
judicial process--su* disob$i5ce is     
puni%able z contempt1 not)/&+ any       
lat]-reveal$ defici5cies 9 ! ord] ''' ,t
 f\ndational #8rule ( law' answ]s n j h[
 ?is compliance inquiry c proce$1 b :y x
 mu/4  7#e7 ,! rule reflects a belief t 
9 ! fair adm9i/ration ( ju/ice no man c 

be judge 9 8 own case1 no matt] h[      
exalt$ 8 /ation or righte\s 8 motives4  
7#f7 ,! ,con/itution does n tol]ate     
willful disob$i5ce ( judicial           
ord]s--especially by (ficials ( a       
coord9ate bran* :o h sworn an oa? to    
uphold x4 ,to p]mit su* (ficials to     
freely annul ! judgm5ts ( ! c\rts ( !   
,unit$ ,/ates w\ld n j de/roy ! rights  
acquir$ "u ^? judgm5ts2 x w\ld make a   
solemn mock]y ( ! con/itution itself4   
7#g7 ,s fatal a result mu/ be deprecat$ 
by all4  7#h7 ,= ! =ego+ reasons1 !     
,c\rt w f9d probable cause t ,def5dants'
 actions con/itute contempt4 ,x w       
provide !m an opportunity to purge su*  
contempt4 ,if !y opt n to d s1 ! ,c\rt w
 proce$ to id5tify ! contemnor7s7 & ref]
 ! matt] = prosecution4 ,a sep>ate ,ord]
 s /at+ w issue ?is day4  ,on ,m>* #ah1 
#bjbe1 ,presid5t ,trump publi%$ a       
/atem5t d5igrat+ & call+ = ! impea*m5t (
 a judge4 ,9 relevant "p1 ! /atem5t     
av]r$ z foll[s3  7#a7 ,?is ,radical     
,left ,lunatic ( a ,judge1 a tr\blemak] 

& agitator :o 0 sadly appo9t$ by ,b>ack 
,husse9 ,obama1 0 n elect$ ,presid5t4   
7#b7 ,?is judge1 l _m ( ! ,crook$       
,judges' ,i am =c$ to appe> be=e1 %\ld  
be ,,impea*$  ,on ,m>* #ah1 #bjbe1 ,,npr
 publi%$ an article relat$ to !         
,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1  
report+ on ! ,presid5t's call = a judge 
to be impea*$4 ,9 relevant "p1 ! article
 /at$ z foll[s3  7#a7 ,)\t nam+ ,james  
,boasb]g1 ! *ief judge ( ! di/rict c\rt 
( ,wa%+ton1 ,,dc1 ,trump said1 ,?is     
judge1 l _m ( ! ,crook$ ,judges' ,i am  
=c$ to appe> be=e1 %\ld be ,,impea*$'   
,he also call$ ,boasb]g a #8,radical    
,left ,lunatic ( a ,judge1 a tr\blemak] 
& agitator :o 0 sadly appo9t$ by ,b>ack 
,husse9 ,obama4  7#b7 ,react+ to !      
,presid5t's social m$ia po/1 ,*ief      
,ju/ice ,john ,rob]ts issu$ a writt5    
/atem5t ( 8 own3 ,= m ?an two c5turies x
 has be5 e/abli%$ t impea*m5t is n an   
appropriate response to disagreem5ts    
conc]n+ a judicial decision4 ,! normal  
appellate review process exi/s = t      

purpose4  ,on ,april #aj1 #bjbe1 !      
,supreme ,c\rt issu$ op9ion ,no4        
#bd;,a#idi reg>d+ ! ,trump              
,adm9i/ration's reque/ to vacate an     
injunction issu$ by ! ,u4,s4 ,di/rict   
,c\rt = ! ,di/rict ( ,m>yl&4  ,! c\rt's 
unanim\s judgm5t & reason+ 9 op9ion ,no4
 #bd;,a#idi 7available = p]usal71 9     
relevant "p1 /at$3  7#a7 ,on ,m>* #ae1  
#bjbe1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates remov$ ,kilm>    
,arm&o ,abrego ,g>cia f ! ,unit$ ,/ates 
to ,el ,salvador1 :]e he is curr5tly    
deta9$ 9 ! ,c5t] = ,t]rorism ,conf9em5t 
7,,cecot74 ,! ,unit$ ,/ates ackn[l$ges t
 ,abrego ,g>cia 0 subject to a )hold+   
ord] =bidd+ 8 removal to ,el ,salvador1 
& t ! removal to ,el ,salvador 0 !re=e  
illegal4 ,! ,unit$ ,/ates repres5ts t ! 
removal to ,el ,salvador 0 ! result ( an
 adm9i/rative error4  7#b7 ,! ,unit$    
,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict (    
,m>yl&'s ord] prop]ly requires !        
,gov]nm5t to facilitate ,abrego ,g>cia's
 release f cu/ody 9 ,el ,salvador & to  
ensure t 8 case is h&l$ z x w\ld h be5  

_h he n be5 improp]ly s5t to ,el        
,salvador4  ,fur!r 9 ! /atem5t ( ,ju/ice
 ,sotomayor1 ) :om ,ju/ice ,kagan &     
,ju/ice ,jackson jo91 respect+ ! ,c\rt's
 disposition ( ! application av]r$ t3   
7#a7 ,! ,unit$ ,/ates ,gov]nm5t arre/$  
,kilm> ,arm&o ,abrego ,g>cia 9 ,m>yl& & 
flew him to a #8t]rorism conf9em5t c5t]'
 9 ,el ,salvador1 :]e he has be5 deta9$ 
= #bf days & c\nt+4 ,to ?is day1 !      
,gov]nm5t has cit$ no basis 9 law =     
,abrego ,g>cia's w>rantless arre/1 8    
removal to ,el ,salvador1 or 8 conf9em5t
 9 a ,salvadoran prison4 ,nor c\ld x4 ,!
 ,gov]nm5t rema9s b\nd by an            
,immigration ,judge's #bjai ord]        
expressly prohibit+ ,abrego ,g>cia's    
removal to ,el ,salvador because he fac$
 a cle> probability ( future p]secution 
!re & demon/rat$ t ,el ,salvador's      
au?orities 7 & w\ld be unable or unwill+
 to protect him4  7#b7 ,! ,gov]nm5t has 
n *all5g$ ! validity ( t ord]4 ,in/ead (
 ha/5+ to correct its egregi\s error1 ! 
,gov]nm5t dismiss$ x z an ov]sight4     

7#c7 ,! ,gov]nm5t's argum5t1 moreov]1   
implies t x c\ld deport & inc>c]ate any 
p]son1 includ+ ,u4,s4 citiz5s1 )\t legal
 consequ5ce1 s long z x does s be=e a   
c\rt c int]v5e4  ,on ,april #ad1 #bjbe1 
days aft] ! ,supreme ,c\rt issu$ ! above
 op9ion ,no4 #bd;,a#idi1 9 a meet+ )    
,presid5t ,nayib ,bukele ( ,el          
,salvador1 ,attorney ,g5]al ,pamela     
,bondi1 ,secret>y ( ,/ate ,m>co ,rubio1 
& ,:ite ,h\se ,deputy ,*ief ( ,/aff     
,/eph5 ,mill]--,presid5t ,donald ,trump 
0 pres5t & condon$ _! untru?ful /atem5ts
 oppos+ ! c\rts op9ion relat$ to ,abrego
 ,g>cia's removal f ! ,unit$ ,/ates & ! 
,supreme ,c\rt's ord] to facilitate 8   
return4 ,! meet+ 0 record$ by ,c-,,span4
 ,9 ! meet+1 ,presid5t ,trump condon$ & 
def5d$ ! untru?s t und]m9e ! ,fif?      
,am5dm5t m&ate ( due process prior to ! 
removal ( citiz5s & non-citiz5s f !     
,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica4  ,c-,,span     
report$ ! foll[+3 8,presid5t ,trump     
,meets ) ,presid5t ( ,el ,salvador3     
,dur+ an ,oval ,(fice meet+ )           

,salvadoran ,presid5t ,nayib ,bukele1   
,presid5t ,donald ,trump & memb]s ( 8   
adm9i/ration argu$ !y 7 n requir$ to    
return deport$ ,salvadoran citiz5 ,kilm>
 ,abrego ,g>cia to ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 9   
spite ( ! ,supreme ,c\rt rul+ 9 favor ( 
facilitat+ 8 return4 ,presid5t ,bukele  
himself said t he 0 n au?oriz$ to return
 ,mr4 ,g>cia1 :o 0 legally pres5t 9 !   
,u4,s4 be=e be+ deport$ 9 ,m>*4 ,!      
,trump adm9i/ration alleg$ t he 0 a     
memb] ( ! ,,ms-#ac gang1 b x previ\sly  
admitt$ t ! deportation 0 an            
#8adm9i/rative error4'0  ,on ,april #ag1
 #bjbe1 days aft] ! ,:ite ,h\se meet+   
ref]5c$ above1 ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,c\rt (  
,appeals = ! ,f\r? ,circuit r5d]$ an    
ord] expos+1 ) meticul\s explication1 ! 
untru?s utiliz$--by ,attorney ,g5]al    
,pamela ,bondi1 ,secret>y ( ,/ate ,m>co 
,rubio1 ,:ite ,h\se ,deputy ,*ief (     
,/aff ,/eph5 ,mill]1 & condon$ by       
,presid5t ,donald ,trump--to d5y due    
process m&at$ 9 ! ,fif? ,am5dm5t ( !    
,con/itution4  ,wilk9son1 ,circuit      

,judge ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,c\rt (        
,appeals = ! ,f\r? ,circuit1 ) :om      
,circuit ,judges ,k+ & ,?ack] jo91 /at$ 
9 relevant "p z foll[s3  7#a7 ,x is     
difficult 9 "s cases to get to ! v he>t 
( ! matt]4 ,b 9 ?is case1 x is n h>d at 
all4 ,! gov]nm5t is ass]t+ a "r to /a%  
away resid5ts ( ?is c\ntry 9 =eign      
prisons )\t ! semblance ( due process t 
is ! f\ndation ( our con/itutional ord]4
 ,fur!r1 x claims 9 ess5ce t because x  
has rid itself ( cu/ody t !re is no?+ t 
c be done4 ,?is %\ld be %ock+ n only to 
judges1 b to ! intuitive s5se ( lib]ty t
 ,am]icans f> remov$ f c\r?\ses /ill    
hold de>4 ,! gov]nm5t ass]ts t ,abrego  
,g>cia is a t]rori/ & a memb] (         
,,ms-#ac4 ,p]haps1 b p]haps n4          
,reg>dless1 he is /ill entitl$ to due   
process4 ,if ! gov]nm5t is confid5t (   
its position1 x %\ld be assur$ t        
position w prevail 9 proce$+s to t]m9ate
 ! )hold+ ( removal ord] 4 4 4 ,moreov]1
 ! gov]nm5t has conc$$ t ,abrego ,g>cia 
0 wrongly or #8mi/ak5ly' deport$4 ,:y !n

 %\ld x n make :at 0 wrong1 "r8  7#b7 ,!
 ,supreme ,c\rt's decision does n1      
h[ev]1 all[ ! gov]nm5t to d ess5tially  
no?+4 ,x requires ! gov]nm5t to         
facilitate ,abrego ,g>cia's release f   
cu/ody 9 ,el ,salvador & to ensure t 8  
case is h&l$ z x w\ld h be5 _h he n be5 
improp]ly s5t to ,el ,salvador4'''      
,facilitate is an active v]b4 ,x        
requires t /eps be tak5 z ! ,supreme    
,c\rt has made p]fectly cle>4  7#c7     
,facilitation does n p]mit ! admitt$ly  
errone\s deportation ( an individual to 
! "o c\ntry's prisons t ! )hold+ ord]   
=bids &1 fur!r1 to d s 9 disreg>d ( a   
c\rt ord] t ! gov]nm5t n s subtly       
spurns4 ,facilitation does n sanction ! 
abrogation ( habeas corpus ?r\gh !      
transf] ( cu/ody to =eign det5tion c5t]s
 9 ! mann] attempt$ "h4 ,all[+ all ?is  
w\ld facilitate =eign det5tion m ?an x  
w\ld dome/ic return4 ,x w\ld r$uce !    
rule ( law to lawlessness & t>ni% ! v   
values = :i* ,am]icans ( div]se views & 
p]suasions h always /ood4  7#d7 ,if     

today ! ,executive claims ! "r to deport
 )\t due process & 9 disreg>d ( c\rt    
ord]s1 :at assurance w !re be tomorr[ t 
x w n deport ,am]ican citiz5s & !n      
disclaim responsibility to br+ !m home8 
,& :at assurance %all !re be t !        
,executive w n tra9 its broad           
discretion>y p[]s ^u its political      
enemies8 ,! ?reat1 ev5 if n ! actuality1
 w\ld always be pres5t1 & ! ,executive's
 obligation to take ,c>e t ! ,laws be   
fai?fully execut$ w\ld lose its mean+4  
7#e7 ,today1 bo? ! ,unit$ ,/ates & ! ,el
 ,salvadoran gov]nm5ts disclaim any     
au?ority &_/or responsibility to return 
,abrego ,g>cia4 ,see ,presid5t ,trump   
,p>ticipates 9 a ,bilat]al ,meet+ ) !   
,presid5t ( ,el ,salvador1 ,,:ite ,,h\se
 7,apr4 #ad1 #bjbe74 ,we are told t     
nei!r gov]nm5t has ! p[] to act4 ,!     
result w be to leave matt]s g5]ally &   
,abrego ,g>cia specifically 9 an        
int]m9able limbo )\t rec\rse to law (   
any sort4  7#f7 ,n[ ! bran*es come too  
close to gr9d+ irrevocably aga9/ "o     

ano!r 9 a conflict t promises to dim9i% 
bo?4 ,?is is a los+ proposition all     
ar\nd4 ,! ,judici>y w lose mu* f !      
con/ant intimations ( its illegitimacy1 
to :i* by d5t ( cu/om & deta*m5t we c   
only sp>+ly reply4 ,! ,executive w lose 
mu* f a public p]ception ( its          
lawlessness & all ( its att5dant        
contagions4 ,! ,executive may succe$ = a
 "t 9 weak5+ ! c\rts1 b ov] "t hi/ory w 
script ! tragic gap betwe5 :at 0 & all t
 might h be51 & law 9 "t w sign its     
epitaph4  ,on ,april #bi1 #bjbe1 9 an   
int]view ) ,,abc ,news1 :ile discuss+ ! 
cont9u$ det5tion ( ,kilm> ,arm&o ,abrego
 ,g>cia 9 ,el ,salvador1 ! int]view]    
said1 ,y c\ld get him back4 ,!re's a    
phone on ?is desk4 ,presid5t ,donald    
,john ,trump repli$1 ,i c\ld4  ,not)/&+ 
all t has be5 pres5t$ above1 ! ,trump   
,adm9i/ration cont9ues to fl\t !        
,supreme ,c\rt's ,april #aj1 #bjbe1     
ord]1 to facilitate ,abrego ,g>cia's    
release f cu/ody 9 ,el ,salvador & to   
ensure t 8 case is h&l$ z x w\ld h be5  

_h he n be5 improp]ly s5t to ,el        
,salvador4  ,on ,may #b1 #bjbe1 ,reut]s 
report$ t ,u4,s4 ,supreme ,c\rt ,ju/ice 
,ketanji ,br[n ,jackson address$        
,presid5t ,donald ,trump's attacks on ! 
judici>y4 ,9 relevant "p1 ! article /at$
 z foll[s3  7#a7 ,u4,s4 ,supreme ,c\rt  
,ju/ice ,ketanji ,br[n ,jackson said on 
,?ursday attacks by ,republican         
,presid5t ,donald ,trump & 8 allies on  
judges 7 n r&om & seem$ design$ to      
intimidate ! judici>y4  7#b7            
,p>ticul>ly1 ,u4,s4 ,supreme ,c\rt      
,ju/ice ,jackson rem>k$ t1 ,! attacks   
are n r&om4 ,!y seem design$ to         
intimidate ^? ( u :o s]ve 9 ?is critical
 capacity4  7#c7 ,ju/ice ,jackson add$1 
,! ?reats & h>assm5t are attacks on our 
democracy1 on our sy/em ( gov]nm5t4 ,&  
!y ultimately risk und]m9+ our          
,con/itution & ! rule ( law4  ,on ,may  
#d1 #bjbe1 :5 ask$1 ,presid5t ,trump did
 n affirm 8 duty to uphold !            
,con/itution1 despite 8 presid5tial oa? 
to1 fai?fully execute ! ,(fice (        

,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 & ''' to ! 
be/ ( 8 ability1 pres]ve1 protect &     
def5d ! ,con/itution ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 
,9 an ,,nbc ,news ,meet ! ,press        
int]view1 :5 discuss+ ! facilitation (  
,abrego ,g>cia's return1 ,presid5t      
,trump 0 ask$1 ,! ,con/itution says e   
p]son1 citiz5s & non-citiz5s1 des]ve due
 process ''' ,don't y ne$ to uphold !   
,con/itution ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates z        
,presid5t8 to :i* he respond$ by say+1  
,i don't "k4  ,9 all ?is1 ,presid5t     
,donald ,john ,trump gravely endang]$ ! 
sep>ation ( p[]s )9 ! gov]nm5t & its    
in/itutions4 ,he ?reat5$ ! integrity ( !
 democratic sy/em by condon+ ! und]m9+ (
 ! judicial indep5d5ce ( ! ,f$]al       
judici>y1 violat+ ! due process clause 9
 ! ,fif? ,am5dm5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates     
,con/itution1 d5igrat+ ,f$]al judges1   
ignor+ ! sep>ation ( p[]s1 condon+ !    
fl\t+ ( ord]s ( ,unit$ ,/ates ,f$]al    
,c\rts 7includ+ ord]s ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates 
,supreme ,c\rt7--all ( :i* h caus$ !    
devolution ( democracy )9 ! ,unit$      

,/ates ( ,am]ica into au?orit>ianism )  
himself z an au?orit>ian ,presid5t4 ,he 
!reby betray$ 8 tru/ z ,presid5t1 to !  
manife/ injury ( ! p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 
,:]e=e1 au?orit>ian ,presid5t ,donald   
,john ,trump1 by su* conduct1 has       
demon/rat$ t he w rema9 a ?reat to      
democracy & ! ,con/itution if all[$ to  
rema9 9 (fice1 & has act$ 9 a mann]     
grossly incompatible ) self-gov]nance & 
! rule ( law4 ,donald ,john ,trump ?us  
w>rants impea*m5t1 trial & removal f    
(fice1 z he is unfit to be ,presid5t4