,,iv  #aai? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #bdf  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,m>* #bd1 #bjbe,mr4   
,ogles 7= himself & ,mr4 ,davidson7     
submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0     
ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ! ,judici>y   
,,resolution  ,impea*+ ,!odore ,*uang1 a
 judge ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt 
= ! ,di/rict ( ,m>yl&1 = high crimes &  
misdemeanors4  ,t ,!odore ,*uang1 a     
judge ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt =
 ! ,di/rict ( ,m>yl&1 is impea*$ = high 
crimes & misdemeanors1 & t ! foll[+     
article ( impea*m5t be exhibit$ 9 !     
,s5ate3 ,article ( impea*m5t exhibit$ by
 ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$   
,/ates ( ,am]ica 9 ! "n ( itself & ( ! p
 ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/     
,!odore ,*uang1 a judge ( ! ,unit$      
,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict (    
,m>yl&1 9 ma9t5ance & support ( its     
impea*m5t aga9/ him = high crimes &     
misdemeanors4  ,article ,i  ,!odore     
,*uang1 a judge ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates       
,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict ( ,m>yl&1   

engag$ 9 a patt]n ( conduct t is        
incompatible ) ! tru/ & confid5ce plac$ 
9 him z a ,f$]al judge z foll[s3  ,judge
 ,*uang1 9 8 memor&um op9ion on ,m>*    
#ah1 #bjbe1 relat$ to ! case ,j4 ,does  
v4 ,elon ,musk1 et al41 issu$ a         
prelim9>y injunction ord]+1 among o!r   
?+s1 ! gov]nm5t to re9/ate access to    
email1 paym5ts1 security notifications1 
& o!r electronic sy/ems1 includ+ re/or+ 
delet$ emails1 = curr5t ,,usaid         
employees & ,p,s,cs4 ,9 issu+ a tempor>y
 re/ra9+ ord] requir+ provision ( sy/ems
 access to ^! employees & ,p,s,cs1      
,judge ,*uang has )\t m]it m>g9aliz$ !  
,presid5t's ,article ,,ii au?ority1 :i* 
ve/s ! p[] to conduct =eign policy 9 !  
,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 ,?is pat5t 
violation ( ! sep>ation ( p[]s--:i*     
prev5ts ! ,presid5t f respond+ to ?reats
 to our national security pos$ by       
,,usaid employees :o h1 among o!r ?+s1  
disburs$ funds to organizations l9k$ to 
,=eign ,t]rori/ ,organizations--is      
entirely inconsi/5t ) s]v+ ! ,unit$     

,/ates z a di/rict c\rt judge4  ,judge  
,*uang1 9 m&at+ ! imm$iate provision (  
access to gov]nm5t sy/ems )\t reg>d = ! 
,presid5t's duty "u ,article ,,ii to    
def5d ! national security ( ! ,unit$    
,/ates1 has done s 9 a mann] t is       
arbitr>y & caprici\s4 ,judge ,*uang     
m&at$ su* access )\t reg>d = ! tr\bl$   
hi/ory ( =eign assi/ance ?r\gh ! ,unit$ 
,/ates ,ag5cy = ,int]national           
,developm5t 7,,usaid74 ,a ,m>* #bjba    
,,gao report indicates t f ,,fy#bjae    
until ,,fy#bjai1 ,,usaid did n          
consi/5tly ensure t subaw>ds provid$ =  
projects 9 ! ,gaza ,/rip & ,judea &     
,sam>ia compli$ ) regulations aim$ at   
prev5t+ f9ancial support = t]rorism4 ,m 
rec5tly1 9 ,novemb] #bjbd1 ,,usaid 0    
f\nd to h f9anc$ hundr$s ( ?\s&s ( meals
 = al-,qaida affiliat$ fight]s 9 ,syria4
 ,:ile argu+ t ! ,trump ,adm9i/ration's 
reorganization ( ,,usaid caus$          
irrep>able h>m to ! pla9tiffs1 ,judge   
,*uang fail$ to consid] t 8 decisions   
c\ld easily inflict irrep>able h>m on   

,am]icans & ,am]ican int]e/s4           
,accord+ly1 ,judge ,!odore ,*uang has   
engag$ 9 conduct s lack+ 9 due conc]n = 
! sep>ation ( p[]s & ! national security
 ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates t he is guilty ( high
 crimes & misdemeanors1 is unfit to hold
 ! (fice ( ,f$]al judge1 & %\ld be      
remov$ f (fice4