,,iv  #aai? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #agd  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,febru>y #bg1         
#bjbe,mr4 ,ogles 7= himself & ,mr4 ,gill
 ( ,texas7 submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2
 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on !      
,judici>y  ,,resolution  ,impea*+ ,amir 
,hatem ,mahdy ,ali1 a judge ( ! ,unit$  
,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict (    
,columbia1 = high crimes & misdemeanors4
  ,t ,amir ,hatem ,mahdy ,ali1 a judge (
 ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = !     
,di/rict ( ,columbia1 is impea*$ = high 
crimes & misdemeanors1 & t ! foll[+     
article ( impea*m5t be exhibit$ to !    
,s5ate3 ,article ( impea*m5t exhibit$ by
 ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$   
,/ates ( ,am]ica 9 ! "n ( itself & ( ! p
 ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/     
,amir ,hatem ,mahdy ,ali1 a judge ( !   
,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = !        
,di/rict ( ,columbia1 9 ma9t5ance &     
support ( its impea*m5t aga9/ him = high
 crimes & misdemeanors4  ,article ,i    
,amir ,hatem ,mahdy ,ali1 a judge ( !   

,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = !        
,di/rict ( ,columbia1 engag$ 9 a patt]n 
( conduct t is incompatible ) ! tru/ &  
confid5ce plac$ 9 him z a ,f$]al judge1 
z foll[s3  ,judge ,ali1 9 a #bjbd writt5
 /atem5t to ! ,s5ate ,judici>y          
,committee1 ass]t$ t a judge mu/ decide 
issues bas$ on an imp>tial & objective  
application ( ! law to ! record be=e !  
c\rt4 ,9 issu+ a tempor>y re/ra9+ ord]  
aga9/ ! paus+ ( funds promulgat$ 9      
,executive ,ord] #adafi1 ,judge ,ali has
 )\t m]it m>g9aliz$ ! ,presid5t's       
,article ,,ii au?ority1 :i* ve/s ! p[]  
to conduct =eign policy 9 ! ,presid5t ( 
! ,unit$ ,/ates1 & has fur!r compromis$ 
! ,presid5t's fiduci>y obligation to    
review f$]al ag5cies & programs4 ,?is   
pat5t violation ( ,con/itutional        
prec$5t--:i* necess>ily precludes an    
explanation bas$ on ignorance ( !       
supreme law ( ! l&--is entirely         
inconsi/5t ) s]v+ ! ,unit$ ,/ates z a   
di/rict c\rt judge4  ,judge ,ali1 9     
m&at+ ! imm$iate outlay ( funds 9       

contradiction ( subsection 7a7 (        
,section #c ( ,executive ,ord] #adafi1  
has done s 9 a mann] t is arbitr>y &    
caprici\s4 ,! und]/ood purpose ( !      
,presid5t's ,executive ord] 0 to review 
su* funds = consi/5cy ) ,unit$ ,/ates   
=eign policy4 ,by m&at+ imm$iate fund+  
disbursem5t ( funds paus$ by !          
,presid5t's ,executive ord]1 ,judge ,ali
 did s ) no consid]ation = ! tr\bl$     
hi/ory ( =eign assi/ance ?r\gh ! ,unit$ 
,/ates ,ag5cy = ,int]national           
,developm5t 7,,usaid74 ,a ,m>* #bjba    
,,gao report indicates t f ,,fy#bjae    
until ,,fy#bjai1 ,,usaid did n          
consi/5tly ensure t subaw>ds provid$ =  
projects 9 ! ,gaza ,/rip & ,judea &     
,sam>ia compli$ ) regulations aim$ at   
prev5t+ f9ancial support = t]rorism4 ,m 
rec5tly1 9 ,novemb] #bjbd1 ,,usaid 0    
f\nd to h f9anc$ hundr$s ( ?\s&s ( meals
 = al-,qaida affiliat$ fight]s 9 ,syria4
 ,:ile argu+ t ! ,trump adm9i/ration    
fund+ pause caus$ irrep>able h>m1 ,judge
 ,ali fail$ to consid] t 8 decision c\ld

 easily inflict irrep>able h>m on       
,am]icans & ,am]ican int]e/s4           
,accord+ly1 ,judge ,amir ,hatem ,mahdy  
,ali has engag$ 9 conduct s utt]ly lack+
 9 intellectual hone/y & basic integrity
 t he is guilty ( high crimes &         
misdemeanors1 is unfit to hold ! (fice (
 ,f$]al judge1 & %\ld be remov$ f (fice4