,,iv  #aai? ,,congress  #b;d ,session   
,h4 ,,res4 #adba  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(    
,,repres5tatives  ,july #i1 #bjbf,mr4   
,hamadeh ( ,arizona submitt$ ! foll[+   
resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee
 on ! ,judici>y  ,,resolution  ,impea*+ 
,sp>kle ,l4 ,sooknanan1 a ,judge ( !    
,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = !        
,di/rict ( ,columbia1 = high crimes &   
misdemeanors4  ,t ,sp>kle ,l4           
,sooknanan1 a ,judge ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates  
,di/rict ,c\rt = ! ,di/rict ( ,columbia1
 is impea*$ = high crimes & misdemeanors
 & t ! foll[+ articles ( impea*m5t be   
exhibit$ to ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,s5ate3     
,articles ( impea*m5t exhibit$ by !     
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$      
,/ates ( ,am]ica 9 ! "n ( itself & ( ! p
 ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/     
,sp>kle ,l4 ,sooknanan1 a ,judge ( !    
,unit$ ,/ates ,di/rict ,c\rt = !        
,di/rict ( ,columbia1 9 ma9t5ance &     
support ( its impea*m5t aga9/ h] = high 
crimes & misdemeanors4  ,article ,i3    
,abuse ( ,judicial ,au?ority  ,9 h]     

conduct ( ! (fice ( ,judge1 ,sp>kle ,l4 
,sookanan abus$ ! p[] entru/$ to h] 9 t3
  ,judge ,sookanan issu$ an injunction t
 halt$ ,presid5t ,trump's ,,save        
program1 sub/itut+ ! judgm5t ( a s+le   
unelect$ judge = t ( ! duly elect$      
,executive ,bran*4  ,?r\gh ?is          
extraord9>y int]v5tion1 ,judge          
,sooknanan elevat$ p]sonal legal &      
policy pref]5ces above ! con/itutional  
p[]s ve/$ 9 ! ,presid5t4  ,article ,,iii
 grants judges life t5ure dur+ good     
,behavi\r1 n lifetime immunity f        
acc\ntability4 ,:5 judges repeat$ly     
exce$ _! con/itutional role & ex]cise   
p[] nev] grant$ to !m by ! ,con/itution1
 !y violate ! _s ( ! good ,behavi\r     
requirem5t & invite congressional       
scrut9y4 ,congress possesses bo? !      
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve

 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,congress possesses bo? !    
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,9 all ( ?is1 ,sp>kle ,l4    
,sookanan abus$ ! p[]s ( ! judici>y4    
,:]e=e ,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by su*    
conduct1 has demon/rat$ t %e w>rants    
impea*m5t & trial1 removal f (fice1 &   
disqualification to hold & enjoy any    
(fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u !      
,unit$ ,/ates4  ,article ,,ii3          
,usurpation ( ,executive ,au?ority  ,9  
h] conduct ( ! (fice ( ,judge1 ,sp>kle  
,l4 ,sookanan abus$ ! p[] entru/$ to h] 
9 t3  ,by block+ ! implem5tation ( !    
,,save program1 ,judge ,sooknanan       
effectively seiz$ p[]s res]v$ to !      

,executive ,bran* & int]f]$ ) !         
,presid5t's con/itutional responsibility
 to fai?fully execute ! laws ( ! ,unit$ 
,/ates4  ,su* actions repres5t an       
improp] encroa*m5t ^u p[]s entru/$ to   
democratically acc\ntable (ficials4     
,article ,,iii grants judges life t5ure 
dur+ good ,behavi\r1 n lifetime immunity
 f acc\ntability4 ,:5 judges repeat$ly  
exce$ _! con/itutional role & ex]cise   
p[] nev] grant$ to !m by ! ,con/itution1
 !y violate ! _s ( ! good ,behavi\r     
requirem5t & invite congressional       
scrut9y4 ,congress possesses bo? !      
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,congress possesses bo? !    
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 

to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,9 all ( ?is1 ,sp>kle ,l4    
,sookanan abus$ ! p[]s ( ! judici>y4    
,:]e=e ,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by su*    
conduct1 has demon/rat$ t %e w>rants    
impea*m5t & trial1 removal f (fice1 &   
disqualification to hold & enjoy any    
(fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u !      
,unit$ ,/ates4  ,article ,,iii3         
,disreg>d = ! ,sep>ation ( ,p[]s  ,9 h] 
conduct ( ! (fice ( ,judge1 ,sp>kle ,l4 
,sookanan abus$ ! p[] entru/$ to h] 9 t3
  ,! ,fram]s did n e/abli% ! judici>y z 
a sup]-legislature emp[]$ to veto       
executive actions bas$ on policy        
disagreem5ts4  ,judge ,sooknanan's      
actions repres5t a dang]\s expansion (  
judicial p[] at ! exp5se ( !            
con/itutional balance among ! bran*es ( 
gov]nm5t4  ,article ,,iii grants judges 

life t5ure dur+ good ,behavi\r1 n       
lifetime immunity f acc\ntability4 ,:5  
judges repeat$ly exce$ _! con/itutional 
role & ex]cise p[] nev] grant$ to !m by 
! ,con/itution1 !y violate ! _s ( ! good
 ,behavi\r requirem5t & invite          
congressional scrut9y4 ,congress        
possesses bo? ! au?ority & ! obligation 
to *eck abuses by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al     
judici>y4 ,failure to respond to        
judicial ov]rea* risks normaliz+ !      
conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9 ! h&s (    
unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is a        
con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve !
 sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d ! au?ority 
entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es ( gov]nm5t4 
,congress possesses bo? ! au?ority & !  
obligation to *eck abuses by memb]s ( ! 
,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure to respond to 
judicial ov]rea* risks normaliz+ !      
conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9 ! h&s (    
unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is a        
con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve !
 sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d ! au?ority 
entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es ( gov]nm5t4 

,9 all ( ?is1 ,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abus$ ! p[]s ( ! judici>y4  ,:]e=e      
,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by su* conduct1  
has demon/rat$ t %e w>rants impea*m5t & 
trial1 removal f (fice1 &               
disqualification to hold & enjoy any    
(fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u !      
,unit$ ,/ates4  ,article ,,iv3 ,exce$+  
,article ,,iii ,au?ority  ,9 h] conduct 
( ! (fice ( ,judge1 ,sp>kle ,l4         
,sookanan abus$ ! p[] entru/$ to h] 9 t3
  ,f$]al judges are emp[]$ to decide    
cases & controv]sies1 n to dictate      
national policy4  ,judge ,sooknanan's   
sweep+ injunction exce$$ ! limit$       
au?ority grant$ "u ,article ,,iii &     
trans=m$ ! c\rt into an in/rum5t =      
impos+ policy outcomes4  ,article ,,iii 
grants judges life t5ure dur+ good      
,behavi\r1 n lifetime immunity f        
acc\ntability4 ,:5 judges repeat$ly     
exce$ _! con/itutional role & ex]cise   
p[] nev] grant$ to !m by ! ,con/itution1
 !y violate ! _s ( ! good ,behavi\r     
requirem5t & invite congressional       

scrut9y4 ,congress possesses bo? !      
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,congress possesses bo? !    
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,9 all ( ?is1 ,sp>kle ,l4    
,sookanan abus$ ! p[]s ( ! judici>y4    
,:]e=e ,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by su*    
conduct1 has demon/rat$ t %e w>rants    
impea*m5t & trial1 removal f (fice1 &   
disqualification to hold & enjoy any    
(fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u !      

,unit$ ,/ates4  ,article ,v3 ,und]m9+   
,confid5ce 9 ! ,judici>y  ,9 h] conduct 
( ! (fice ( ,judge1 ,sp>kle ,l4         
,sookanan abus$ ! p[] entru/$ to h] 9 t3
  ,by ob/ruct+ a program int5d$ by its  
support]s to /r5g!n election integrity1 
,judge ,sooknanan fo/]$ ! p]ception t   
,f$]al c\rts are increas+ly act+ z      
political actors r ?an imp>tial arbit]s4
  ,public confid5ce 9 ! integrity &     
imp>tiality ( ! judici>y is und]m9$ :5  
judges appe> to place ideological       
pref]5ces above con/itutional limits4   
,article ,,iii grants judges life t5ure 
dur+ good ,behavi\r1 n lifetime immunity
 f acc\ntability4 ,:5 judges repeat$ly  
exce$ _! con/itutional role & ex]cise   
p[] nev] grant$ to !m by ! ,con/itution1
 !y violate ! _s ( ! good ,behavi\r     
requirem5t & invite congressional       
scrut9y4 ,congress possesses bo? !      
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9

 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,congress possesses bo? !    
au?ority & ! obligation to *eck abuses  
by memb]s ( ! ,f$]al judici>y4 ,failure 
to respond to judicial ov]rea* risks    
normaliz+ ! conc5tration ( un*eck$ p[] 9
 ! h&s ( unelect$ judges4 ,impea*m5t is 
a con/itutional rem$y design$ to pres]ve
 ! sep>ation ( p[]s & safegu>d !        
au?ority entru/$ to ! elect$ bran*es (  
gov]nm5t4  ,9 all ( ?is1 ,sp>kle ,l4    
,sookanan abus$ ! p[]s ( ! judici>y4    
,:]e=e ,sp>kle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by su*    
conduct1 has demon/rat$ t %e w>rants    
impea*m5t & trial1 removal f (fice1 &   
disqualification to hold & enjoy any    
(fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u !      
,unit$ ,/ates4