,,iv  #aaith ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #adba  ,,in ,,the ,,house    
,,of ,,representatives  ,july #i1       
#bjbf,mr4 ,hamadeh of ,arizona submitted
 the following resolution2 which was    
referred to the ,committee on the       
,judiciary  ,,resolution  ,impeaching   
,sparkle ,l4 ,sooknanan1 a ,judge of the
 ,united ,states ,district ,court for   
the ,district of ,columbia1 for high    
crimes and misdemeanors4  ,that ,sparkle
 ,l4 ,sooknanan1 a ,judge of the ,united
 ,states ,district ,court for the       
,district of ,columbia1 is impeached for
 high crimes and misdemeanors and that  
the following articles of impeachment be
 exhibited to the ,united ,states       
,senate3 ,articles of impeachment       
exhibited by the ,house of              
,representatives of the ,united ,states 
of ,america in the name of itself and of
 the people of the ,united ,states of   
,america1 against ,sparkle ,l4          
,sooknanan1 a ,judge of the ,united     
,states ,district ,court for the        

,district of ,columbia1 in maintenance  
and support of its impeachment against  
her for high crimes and misdemeanors4   
,article ,i3 ,abuse of ,judicial        
,authority  ,in her conduct of the      
office of ,judge1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan
 abused the power entrusted to her in   
that3  ,judge ,sookanan issued an       
injunction that halted ,president       
,trump's ,,save program1 substituting   
the judgment of a single unelected judge
 for that of the duly elected ,executive
 ,branch4  ,through this extraordinary  
intervention1 ,judge ,sooknanan elevated
 personal legal and policy preferences  
above the constitutional powers vested  
in the ,president4  ,article ,,iii      
grants judges life tenure during good   
,behaviour1 not lifetime immunity from  
accountability4 ,when judges repeatedly 
exceed their constitutional role and    
exercise power never granted to them by 
the ,constitution1 they violate the     
spirit of the good ,behaviour           
requirement and invite congressional    

scrutiny4 ,congress possesses both the  
authority and the obligation to check   
abuses by members of the ,federal       
judiciary4 ,failure to respond to       
judicial overreach risks normalizing the
 concentration of unchecked power in the
 hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment
 is a constitutional remedy designed to 
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4        
,congress possesses both the authority  
and the obligation to check abuses by   
members of the ,federal judiciary4      
,failure to respond to judicial         
overreach risks normalizing the         
concentration of unchecked power in the 
hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment 
is a constitutional remedy designed to  
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4  ,in   
all of this1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abused the powers of the judiciary4     
,wherefore ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by   

such conduct1 has demonstrated that she 
warrants impeachment and trial1 removal 
from office1 and disqualification to    
hold and enjoy any office of honor1     
trust1 or profit under the ,united      
,states4  ,article ,,ii3 ,usurpation of 
,executive ,authority  ,in her conduct  
of the office of ,judge1 ,sparkle ,l4   
,sookanan abused the power entrusted to 
her in that3  ,by blocking the          
implementation of the ,,save program1   
,judge ,sooknanan effectively seized    
powers reserved to the ,executive       
,branch and interfered with the         
,president's constitutional             
responsibility to faithfully execute the
 laws of the ,united ,states4  ,such    
actions represent an improper           
encroachment upon powers entrusted to   
democratically accountable officials4   
,article ,,iii grants judges life tenure
 during good ,behaviour1 not lifetime   
immunity from accountability4 ,when     
judges repeatedly exceed their          
constitutional role and exercise power  

never granted to them by the            
,constitution1 they violate the spirit  
of the good ,behaviour requirement and  
invite congressional scrutiny4 ,congress
 possesses both the authority and the   
obligation to check abuses by members of
 the ,federal judiciary4 ,failure to    
respond to judicial overreach risks     
normalizing the concentration of        
unchecked power in the hands of         
unelected judges4 ,impeachment is a     
constitutional remedy designed to       
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4        
,congress possesses both the authority  
and the obligation to check abuses by   
members of the ,federal judiciary4      
,failure to respond to judicial         
overreach risks normalizing the         
concentration of unchecked power in the 
hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment 
is a constitutional remedy designed to  
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the

 elected branches of government4  ,in   
all of this1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abused the powers of the judiciary4     
,wherefore ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by   
such conduct1 has demonstrated that she 
warrants impeachment and trial1 removal 
from office1 and disqualification to    
hold and enjoy any office of honor1     
trust1 or profit under the ,united      
,states4  ,article ,,iii3 ,disregard for
 the ,separation of ,powers  ,in her    
conduct of the office of ,judge1        
,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan abused the power 
entrusted to her in that3  ,the ,framers
 did not establish the judiciary as a   
super-legislature empowered to veto     
executive actions based on policy       
disagreements4  ,judge ,sooknanan's     
actions represent a dangerous expansion 
of judicial power at the expense of the 
constitutional balance among the        
branches of government4  ,article ,,iii 
grants judges life tenure during good   
,behaviour1 not lifetime immunity from  
accountability4 ,when judges repeatedly 

exceed their constitutional role and    
exercise power never granted to them by 
the ,constitution1 they violate the     
spirit of the good ,behaviour           
requirement and invite congressional    
scrutiny4 ,congress possesses both the  
authority and the obligation to check   
abuses by members of the ,federal       
judiciary4 ,failure to respond to       
judicial overreach risks normalizing the
 concentration of unchecked power in the
 hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment
 is a constitutional remedy designed to 
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4        
,congress possesses both the authority  
and the obligation to check abuses by   
members of the ,federal judiciary4      
,failure to respond to judicial         
overreach risks normalizing the         
concentration of unchecked power in the 
hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment 
is a constitutional remedy designed to  
preserve the separation of powers and   

safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4  ,in   
all of this1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abused the powers of the judiciary4     
,wherefore ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by   
such conduct1 has demonstrated that she 
warrants impeachment and trial1 removal 
from office1 and disqualification to    
hold and enjoy any office of honor1     
trust1 or profit under the ,united      
,states4  ,article ,,iv3 ,exceeding     
,article ,,iii ,authority  ,in her      
conduct of the office of ,judge1        
,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan abused the power 
entrusted to her in that3  ,federal     
judges are empowered to decide cases and
 controversies1 not to dictate national 
policy4  ,judge ,sooknanan's sweeping   
injunction exceeded the limited         
authority granted under ,article ,,iii  
and transformed the court into an       
instrument for imposing policy outcomes4
  ,article ,,iii grants judges life     
tenure during good ,behaviour1 not      
lifetime immunity from accountability4  

,when judges repeatedly exceed their    
constitutional role and exercise power  
never granted to them by the            
,constitution1 they violate the spirit  
of the good ,behaviour requirement and  
invite congressional scrutiny4 ,congress
 possesses both the authority and the   
obligation to check abuses by members of
 the ,federal judiciary4 ,failure to    
respond to judicial overreach risks     
normalizing the concentration of        
unchecked power in the hands of         
unelected judges4 ,impeachment is a     
constitutional remedy designed to       
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4        
,congress possesses both the authority  
and the obligation to check abuses by   
members of the ,federal judiciary4      
,failure to respond to judicial         
overreach risks normalizing the         
concentration of unchecked power in the 
hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment 
is a constitutional remedy designed to  

preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4  ,in   
all of this1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abused the powers of the judiciary4     
,wherefore ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by   
such conduct1 has demonstrated that she 
warrants impeachment and trial1 removal 
from office1 and disqualification to    
hold and enjoy any office of honor1     
trust1 or profit under the ,united      
,states4  ,article ,v3 ,undermining     
,confidence in the ,judiciary  ,in her  
conduct of the office of ,judge1        
,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan abused the power 
entrusted to her in that3  ,by          
obstructing a program intended by its   
supporters to strengthen election       
integrity1 ,judge ,sooknanan fostered   
the perception that ,federal courts are 
increasingly acting as political actors 
rather than impartial arbiters4  ,public
 confidence in the integrity and        
impartiality of the judiciary is        
undermined when judges appear to place  

ideological preferences above           
constitutional limits4  ,article ,,iii  
grants judges life tenure during good   
,behaviour1 not lifetime immunity from  
accountability4 ,when judges repeatedly 
exceed their constitutional role and    
exercise power never granted to them by 
the ,constitution1 they violate the     
spirit of the good ,behaviour           
requirement and invite congressional    
scrutiny4 ,congress possesses both the  
authority and the obligation to check   
abuses by members of the ,federal       
judiciary4 ,failure to respond to       
judicial overreach risks normalizing the
 concentration of unchecked power in the
 hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment
 is a constitutional remedy designed to 
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4        
,congress possesses both the authority  
and the obligation to check abuses by   
members of the ,federal judiciary4      
,failure to respond to judicial         

overreach risks normalizing the         
concentration of unchecked power in the 
hands of unelected judges4 ,impeachment 
is a constitutional remedy designed to  
preserve the separation of powers and   
safeguard the authority entrusted to the
 elected branches of government4  ,in   
all of this1 ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan     
abused the powers of the judiciary4     
,wherefore ,sparkle ,l4 ,sookanan1 by   
such conduct1 has demonstrated that she 
warrants impeachment and trial1 removal 
from office1 and disqualification to    
hold and enjoy any office of honor1     
trust1 or profit under the ,united      
,states4