,i  #aaith ,,congress  #b;d ,session    
,h4 ,r4 #hfhj  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of  
,,representatives  ,may #g1 #bjbf,mr4   
,crank introduced the following bill2   
which was referred to the ,committee on 
,armed ,services  ,a ,,bill  ,to amend  
the ,national ,defense ,authorization   
,act for ,fiscal ,year #bjaf to         
establish a rebuttable presumption in   
favor of authorizing a member of the    
,armed ,forces to carry a personal      
firearm on a military installation4  #a4
 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as
 the ,armed ,forces ,carry ,rights      
,protection ,act of #bjbf4  #b4         
,rebuttable presumption in favor of     
authorizing a member of the ,armed      
,forces to carry a personal firearm on a
 military installation ,section #ebf of 
the ,national ,defense ,authorization   
,act for ,fiscal ,year #bjaf 7,public   
,law #aad-ib2 #aj ,u4,s4,c4 #bfgb note7 
is amended--  7#a7 by inserting 7a7     
,establishment4-- before ,not later2 and
  7#b7 by adding at the end the         

following new subsections3  7b7         
,presumption ,in the process under      
subsection 7a71 there shall be a        
rebuttable presumption in favor of      
authorizing a member to carry a firearm 
owned by such member while the member-- 
7#a7 is on the installation1 center1 or 
facility2 and  7#b7 is not performing   
duty at such installation1 center1 or   
facility4  7c7 ,written denial ,a denial
 of authorization pursuant to such      
process shall--  7#a7 be in writing2 and
  7#b7 include an objective1 clearly    
describable1 and individualized basis   
for such denial4  4