,i  #aai? ,,congress  #a/ ,session  ,h4 
,r4 #edc  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(            
,,repres5tatives  ,janu>y #af1 #bjbe,mr4
 ,torres ( ,new ,york introduc$ ! foll[+
 bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on !
 ,judici>y  ,a ,,bill  ,to direct !     
,bureau ( ,alcohol1 ,tobacco1 ,fire>ms1 
& ,explosives to report on fire>ms      
traffick+ along ! ,i-#ie corridor4  #a4 
,%ort title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z !   
,iron ,pipel9e ,review ,act4  #b4       
,bureau ( ,alcohol1 ,tobacco1 ,fire>ms1 
& ,explosives report on fire>ms         
traffick+ along ! ,i-#ie corridor ,n    
lat] ?an #a ye> aft] ! date ( ! enactm5t
 ( ?is ,act1 & annually !reaft]1 !      
,director ( ! ,bureau ( ,alcohol1       
,tobacco1 ,fire>ms1 & ,explosives1 9    
consultation ) ,/ate & local law        
en=cem5t entities1 & o!r ag5cies or     
/akehold]s z det]m9$ appropriate by !   
,director1 %all submit to ! ,committee  
on ! ,judici>y ( ! ,h\se (              
,repres5tatives & ! ,committee on !     
,judici>y ( ! ,s5ate a report on fire>ms

 traffick$ along ,int]/ate #ie t conta9s
 ! foll[+3 7#a7 ,an analysis ( ! numb] (
 fire>ms traffick$ along ,int]/ate #ie1 
t conta9s ! foll[+3 7,a7 ,fire>ms li/$  
by ! ,/ate ( orig91 & ! make & model ( !
 fire>m4  7,b7 ,an analysis ( !         
effectiv5ess ( c\nt] fire>m traffick+   
measures4  7,c7 ,an analysis ( specific 
local1 ,/ate & ,f$]al laws t affect !   
numb] ( fire>ms traffick$4  7,d7 ,a     
description ( any actions direct$ z a   
result ( ! analysis conduct$ "u ?is     
section4  7#b7 ,recomm5dations1 z       
appropriate1 = ,f$]al1 ,/ate & local law
 en=cem5t entities to improve fire>m    
traffick+ measures ref]r$ to 9 p>agraph 
7#a74  7#c7 ,proposals1 z appropriate1 =
 legislative actions & fund+ ne$$ to    
improve measures to c\nt] fire>m        
traffick+4