,,iii  #aah? ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,s4 ,,res4 #hbe  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!
 ,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,septemb] #ah1        
#bjbd,mrs4 ,murray 7= h]self1 ,mr4      
,blum5?al1 ,mr4 ,casey1 ,ms4 ,cortez    
,ma/o1 ,ms4 ,duckwor?1 ,ms4 ,hirono1    
,mr4 ,m>key1 ,mr4 ,padilla1 ,mr4 ,s&]s1 
& ,mr4 ,:iteh\se7 submitt$ ! foll[+     
resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee
 on ,heal?1 ,education1 ,labor1 &       
,p5sions  ,,resolution  ,recogniz+ !    
significance ( equal pay & ! pay        
disp>ity betwe5 disabl$ wom5 & bo?      
disabl$ & nondisabl$ m54  ,:]eas1 m ?an 
#fj ye>s aft] ,congress enact$ ! ,equal 
,pay ,act ( #aifc 7#bi ,u4,s4,c4 #bjf   
note2 ,public ,law #hh-ch71 an analysis 
( data f ! ,bureau ( ! ,c5sus %[s t     
disabl$ wom5 work]s ov]all are paid an  
av]age ( #ej c5ts = e doll> paid to     
nondisabl$ m52 ,:]eas an analysis by !  
,national ,p>tn]%ip = ,wom5  ,families (
 data f ! ,bureau ( ! ,c5sus %[s t--    
7#a7 = e doll> paid to ,:ite1           
non-,hispanic1 nondisabl$ m5-- 7,a7     

disabl$ ,asian-,am]ican & ,native       
,hawaiian & ,pacific ,isl&] wom5 are    
paid #ee c5ts2  7,b7 disabl$ ,:ite1     
non-,hispanic wom5 are paid #de c5ts2   
7,c7 disabl$ ,black wom5 are paid #de   
c5ts2  7,d7 disabl$ ,am]ican ,indian &  
,alaska ,native wom5 are paid #de c5ts2 
&  7,e7 disabl$ ,lat9as are paid #dd    
c5ts2  7#b7 disabl$ wom5 are paid an    
av]age ( #gb c5ts = e doll> paid to     
disabl$ m52  7#c7 disabl$ p ov]all are  
paid an av]age ( #fh c5ts = e doll> paid
 to nondisabl$ p2 &  7#d7 :ile disabl$ p
 ov]all exp]i5ce a wage gap1 disabl$    
wom51 p>ticul>ly disabl$ wom5 ( color1  
exp]i5ce a m significant wage gap2      
,:]eas1 ( ! #f types ( disability       
assess$ 9 ! ,am]ican ,community         
,survey-- 7#a7 disabl$ wom5 work]s ) ea*
 type ( disability face a wage gap1 z   
comp>$ to nondisabl$ m52 &  7#b7 ! wage 
gap is l>ge/ = disabl$ wom5 work]s :o h 
difficulty liv+ indep5d5tly1 :o are paid
 j #cf c5ts = e doll> paid to nondisabl$
 m5 work]s2 ,:]eas disabl$ wom5 vet]ans 

are paid an av]age ( #fb c5ts = e doll> 
paid to nondisabl$ vet]an m52 ,:]eas !  
wage gap rema9s l>ge = disabl$ wom5 ) m 
education1 z disabl$ wom5 work]s ) #d   
ye>s ( college education are typically  
paid #da1fjj p] ye>1 :i* is less ?an    
nondisabl$ m5 work]s ) a high s*ool     
degree z _! highe/ level ( education2   
,:]eas disabl$ wom5 exp]i5ce            
occupational segregation & are          
ov]repres5t$ 9 l[-paid heal? c>e1       
cl]ical1 & social s]vice jobs2 ,:]eas   
disabl$ wom5 & m5 work]s :o live 9      
in/itutional gr\p qu>t]s are paid an    
av]age ( j #i1jjj p] ye> = disabl$ wom5 
work]s & #aa1jjj p] ye> = disabl$ m5    
work]s1 respectively1 :ile nondisabl$ m5
 ov]all are typically paid an av]age (  
#ej1jjj p] ye>2 ,:]eas segregat$        
workplaces & ! subm9imum wage = disabl$ 
employees /ifle competitive integrat$   
employm5t = disabl$ wom52 ,:]eas _m     
sy/emic b>ri]s affect access to livable 
wages & employm5t opportunities =       
disabl$ wom51 includ+-- 7#a7            

discrim9ation2  7#b7 public b5efits "w  
dis9c5tives2  7#c7 a brok5 heal? c>e    
infra/ructure2  7#d7 increas$           
employm5t-relat$ co/s2  7#e7 inadequate 
vocational rehabilitation s]vices2 &    
7#f7 a lack ( access to support$        
employm5t s]vices2 & ,:]eas ,,lgbtqi    
disabl$ p face additional b>ri]s to     
employm5t1 & m inclusive data on        
,,lgbtqi disabl$ work]s is ne$$ to      
det]m9e ! add$ impact on wages & work=ce
 p>ticipation1 p>ticul>ly = trans &     
nonb9>y disabl$ p :o are (t5 exclud$ f  
data3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t ! ,s5ate--    
7#a7 recognizes ! pay disp>ity betwe5   
disabl$ wom5 & bo? disabl$ & nondisabl$ 
m5 & ! impact ( t pay disp>ity on wom51 
families1 & ! ,unit$ ,/ates2 &  7#b7    
reaffirms its commitm5t to support+     
equal pay = disabl$ wom51 n>r[+ ! g5d]1 
disability1 & racial wage gaps1 &       
address+ ! sy/emic b>ri]s t drive ^?    
inequities4