,,ii #aah? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,s4 #eej ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,! ,,unit$ ,,/ates ,febru>y #bh1 #bjbc,mr4 ,braun introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 read twice & ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,heal?1 ,education1 ,labor1 & ,p5sions ,a ,,bill ,to am5d ! ,work=ce ,innovation & ,opportunity ,act to prioritize programs t provide evid5ce ( p]=mance4 #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z ! ,prioritiz+ ,evid5ce = ,work=ce ,developm5t ,act4 #b4 ,prioritiz+ programs t provide evid5ce ( p]=mance ,section #ajb ( ! ,work=ce ,innovation & ,opportunity ,act 7#bi ,u4,s4,c4 #caab7 is am5d$-- 7#a7 9 subsection 7b7-- 7,a7 9 p>agraph 7#a7-- 7i7 9 subp>agraph 7,d71 by /rik+ & aft] ! semicolon2 7ii7 9 subp>agraph 7,e71 by /rik+ ! p]iod at ! end & ins]t+ 2 &2 & 7iii7 by add+ at ! end ! foll[+3 7,f7 a description ( h[ ! ,/ate plans to prioritize ! fund+ ( evid5ce-bas$ programs = :i* evid5ce f a rigor\s evaluation ( ! programs %[s a positive effect on ! t>get population = ! programs1 ) highe/ priority giv5 to programs t are high-evid5ce int]v5tions1 next priority giv5 to programs t are mod]ate-evid5ce int]v5tions1 & next priority giv5 to programs t are l[-evid5ce int]v5tions4 2 & 7,b7 9 p>agraph 7#b77;,c7-- 7i7 9 clause 7vii71 by /rik+ & aft] ! semicolon2 7ii7 9 clause 7viii71 by /rik+ ! p]iod at ! end & ins]t+ 2 &2 & 7iii7 by add+ at ! end ! foll[+3 7ix7 h[ ! ,/ate w prioritize ! fund+ ( evid5ce-bas$ programs = :i* evid5ce f a rigor\s evaluation ( ! programs %[s a positive effect on ! t>get population = ! programs4 2 & 7#b7 by add+ at ! end ! foll[+3 7d7 ,def9itions ,9 subsection 7b73 7#a7 ,evid5ce-bas$ ,! t]m evid5ce-bas$1 us$ ) respect to an activity1 /rategy1 or o!r int]v5tion1 means a high-evid5ce1 mod]ate-evid5ce1 or l[-evid5ce int]v5tion4 7#b7 ,high-evid5ce ,! t]m high-evid5ce1 us$ ) respect to an int]v5tion1 means an int]v5tion t is %[n to produce a sizable1 su/a9$ effect on important outcomes1 9-- 7,a7 two or m well-conduct$ exp]im5tal /udies c>ri$ out 9 typical community sett+s & conduct$ at diff]5t implem5tation sites2 or 7,b7 "o l>ge multisite well-conduct$ exp]im5tal /udy c>ri$ out 9 su* a sett+4 7#c7 ,l[-evid5ce ,! t]m l[-evid5ce1 us$ ) respect to an int]v5tion1 means an int]v5tion t is %[n to produce or h ! pot5tial to produce a positive effect on important outcomes1 9 a /udy bas$ on a reasonable hypo!sis & ) cr$ible rese>* f9d+s1 su* z a correlational /udy ) /ati/ical controls = selection bias or descriptive rese>* su* z a case /udy4 7#d7 ,mod]ate-evid5ce ,! t]m mod]ate-evid5ce1 us$ ) respect to an int]v5tion1 means an int]v5tion t is %[n to produce a positive effect1 t is sizable b n yet conclusive1 on important outcomes1 9 at lea/ "o well-conduct$ exp]im5tal /udy1 or 9 a rigor\s quasi-exp]im5tal /udy f :i* a rese>*] c draw a causal conclusion reg>d+ ! int]v5tion's effectiv5ess4 7#e7 ,well-conduct$ exp]im5tal /udy ,! t]m well-conduct$ exp]im5tal /udy means an exp]im5tal /udy su* z a /udy ) r&omiz$ controll$ trials4 4