,,ii #aahth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 #cjej ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,october #ag1 #bjbc,mr4 ,rounds 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,schumer1 ,mr4 ,young1 and ,mr4 ,heinrich7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,committee on ,armed ,services ,a ,,bill ,to require a report on artificial intelligence regulation in the financial services industry1 to establish artificial intelligence bug bounty programs1 to require a vulnerability analysis study for artificial intelligence-enabled military applications1 and to require a report on data sharing and coordination1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,artificial ,intelligence ,advancement ,act of #bjbc4 #b4 ,definitions ,in this ,act3 7#a7 ,congressional defense committees ,the term congressional defense committees has the meaning given such term in section #aja of title #aj1 ,united ,states ,code4 7#b7 ,foundational artificial intelligence model ,the term foundational artificial intelligence model means an adaptive generative model that is trained on a broad set of unlabeled data sets that can be used for different tasks1 with minimal fine-tuning4 #c4 ,report on artificial intelligence regulation in financial services industry 7a7 ,in general ,not later than #ij days after the date of enactment of this ,act1 each of the ,board of ,governors of the ,federal ,reserve ,system1 the ,federal ,deposit ,insurance ,corporation1 the ,office of the ,comptroller of the ,currency1 the ,national ,credit ,union ,administration1 and the ,bureau of ,consumer ,financial ,protection shall submit to the ,committee on ,banking1 ,housing and ,urban ,affairs of the ,senate and the ,committee on ,financial ,services of the ,house of ,representatives a report on its gap in knowledge relating to artificial intelligence1 including an analysis on-- 7#a7 which tasks are most frequently being assisted or completed with artificial intelligence in the institutions the agency regulates2 7#b7 current governance standards in place for artificial intelligence use at the agency and current standards in place for artificial intelligence oversight by the agency2 7#c7 potentially additional regulatory authorities required by the agency to continue to successfully execute its mission2 7#d7 where artificial intelligence may lead to overlapping regulatory issues between agencies that require clarification2 7#e7 how the agency is currently using artificial intelligence1 how the agency plans to use such artificial intelligence the next #c years1 and the expected impact1 including fiscal and staffing1 of those plans2 and 7#f7 what resources1 monetary or other resources1 if any1 the agency requires to both adapt to the changes that artificial intelligence will bring to the regulatory landscape and to adequately adopt and oversee the use of artificial intelligence across its operations described in paragraph 7#e74 7b7 ,rule of construction ,nothing in this section may be construed to require an agency to include confidential supervisory information or pre-decisional or deliberative non-public information in a report under this section4 #d4 ,artificial intelligence bug bounty programs 7a7 ,program for foundational artificial intelligence products being incorporated by ,department of ,defense 7#a7 ,development required ,not later than #ahj days after the date of the enactment of this ,act and subject to the availability of appropriations1 the ,chief ,data and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer of the ,department of ,defense shall develop a bug bounty program for foundational artificial intelligence models being integrated into ,department of ,defense missions and operations4 7#b7 ,collaboration ,in developing the program required by paragraph 7#a71 the ,chief may collaborate with the heads of other government agencies that have expertise in cybersecurity and artificial intelligence4 7#c7 ,implementation authorized ,the ,chief may carry out the program developed pursuant to subsection 7a74 7#d7 ,contracts ,the ,secretary of ,defense shall ensure1 as may be appropriate1 that whenever the ,department of ,defense enters into any contract1 the contract allows for participation in the bug bounty program developed pursuant to paragraph 7#a74 7#e7 ,rule of construction ,nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require-- 7,a7 the use of any foundational artificial intelligence model2 or 7,b7 the implementation of the program developed pursuant to paragraph 7#a7 in order for the ,department to incorporate a foundational artificial intelligence model4 7b7 ,briefing ,not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,chief shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on-- 7#a7 the development and implementation of bug bounty programs the ,chief considers relevant to the matters covered by this section2 and 7#b7 long-term plans of the ,chief with respect to such bug bounty programs4 #e4 ,vulnerability analysis study for artificial intelligence-enabled military applications 7a7 ,study required ,not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer 7,,cdao7 of the ,department of ,defense shall complete a study analyzing the vulnerabilities to the privacy1 security1 and accuracy of1 and capacity to assess1 artificial intelligence-enabled military applications1 as well as research and development needs for such applications4 7b7 ,elements ,the study required by subsection 7a7 shall cover the following3 7#a7 ,research and development needs and transition pathways to advance explainable and interpretable artificial intelligence-enabled military applications1 including the capability to assess the underlying algorithms and data models of such applications4 7#b7 ,assessing the potential risks to the privacy1 security1 and accuracy of underlying architectures and algorithms of artificial intelligence-enabled military applications1 including the following3 7,a7 ,individual foundational artificial intelligence models1 including the adequacy of existing testing1 training1 and auditing for such models to ensure models can be properly assessed over time4 7,b7 ,the interactions of multiple artificial intelligence-enabled military applications1 and the ability to detect and assess new1 complex1 and emergent behavior amongst individual agents1 as well as the collective impact1 including how such changes may affect risk to privacy1 security1 and accuracy over time4 7,c7 ,the impact of increased agency in artificial intelligence-enabled military applications and how such increased agency may affect the ability to detect and assess new1 complex1 and emergent behavior1 as well risks to the privacy1 security1 and accuracy of such applications over time4 7#c7 ,assessing the survivability and traceability of decision support systems that are integrated with artificial intelligence-enabled military applications and used in a contested environment1 including-- 7,a7 potential benefits and risks to ,department of ,defense missions and operations of implementing such applications2 and 7,b7 other technical or operational constraints to ensure such decision support systems that are integrated with artificial intelligence-enabled military applications are able to adhere to the ,department of ,defense ,ethical ,principles for ,artificial ,intelligence4 7#d7 ,identification of existing artificial intelligence metrics1 developmental1 testing and audit capabilities1 personnel1 and infrastructure within the ,department of ,defense1 including test and evaluation facilities1 needed to enable ongoing identification and assessment under paragraphs 7#a7 through 7#c71 and other factors such as-- 7,a7 implications for deterrence systems based on systems warfare2 and 7,b7 vulnerability to systems confrontation on the system and system-of-systems level4 7#e7 ,identification of gaps or research needs to sufficiently respond to the elements outlined in this subsection that are not currently1 or not sufficiently1 funded within the ,department of ,defense4 7c7 ,coordination ,in carrying out the study required by subsection 7a71 the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer shall coordinate with the following3 7#a7 ,the ,director of the ,defense ,advanced ,research ,projects ,agency 7,,darpa74 7#b7 ,the ,under ,secretary of ,defense for ,research and ,evaluation4 7#c7 ,the ,under ,secretary of ,defense for ,policy4 7#d7 ,the ,director for ,operational ,test and ,evaluation 7,,dot,e7 of the ,department4 7#e7 ,as the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer considers appropriate1 the following3 7,a7 ,the ,secretary of ,energy4 7,b7 ,the ,director of the ,national ,institute of ,standards and ,technology4 7,c7 ,the ,director of the ,national ,science ,foundation4 7,d7 ,the head of the ,national ,artificial ,intelligence ,initiative ,office of the ,office of ,science and ,technology ,policy4 7,e7 ,members and representatives of industry4 7,f7 ,members and representatives of academia4 7d7 ,interim briefing ,not later than #ahj days after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the interim findings of the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer with respect to the study being conducted pursuant to subsection 7a74 7e7 ,final report 7#a7 ,in general ,not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the findings of the ,chief ,digital and ,artificial ,intelligence ,officer with respect to the study conducted pursuant to subsection 7a74 7#b7 ,form ,the final report submitted pursuant to paragraph 7#a7 shall be submitted in unclassified for1 but may include a classified annex4 #f4 ,report on data sharing and coordination 7a7 ,in general ,not later than #ahj days after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,secretary of ,defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on ways to improve data sharing1 interoperability1 and quality1 as may be appropriate1 across the ,department of ,defense4 7b7 ,contents ,the report submitted pursuant to subsection 7a7 shall include the following3 7#a7 ,a description of policies1 practices1 and cultural barriers that impede data sharing and interoperability1 and lead to data quality issues1 among components of the ,department4 7#b7 ,the impact a lack of appropriate levels of data sharing1 interoperability1 and quality has on ,departmental collaboration1 efficiency1 interoperability1 and joint-decisionmaking4 7#c7 ,a review of current efforts to promote appropriate data sharing1 including to centralize data management1 such as the ,,avana program4 7#d7 ,a description of near-1 mid-1 and long-term efforts that the ,office of the ,secretary of ,defense plans to implement to promote data sharing and interoperability1 including efforts to improve data quality4 7#e7 ,a detailed plan to implement a data sharing and interoperability strategy that supports effective development and employment of artificial intelligence-enabled military applications4 7#f7 ,a detailed assessment of the implementation of the ,department of ,defense ,data ,strategy issued in #bjbj1 as well as the use of data decrees to improve management rigor in the ,department when it comes to data sharing and interoperability4 7#g7 ,any recommendations for ,congress with respect to assisting the ,department in these efforts4