,,ii  #aahth ,,congress  #ast ,session  
,s4 #aibc  ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of     
,,the ,,united ,,states  ,june #ab1     
#bjbc,mrs4 ,capito 7for herself and ,mr4
 ,daines7 introduced the following bill2
 which was read twice and referred to   
the ,committee on ,environment and      
,public ,works  ,a ,,bill  ,to prohibit 
the ,environmental ,protection ,agency  
from finalizing1 implementing1 or       
enforcing a proposed rule with respect  
to new source performance standards from
 certain stationary sources1 and for    
other purposes4  #a4 ,short title ,this 
,act may be cited as the ,protect ,our  
,power ,plants ,act of #bjbc or the     
,,popp ,act of #bjbc4  #b4 ,findings    
,congress finds that-- 7#a7 the decision
 of the ,supreme ,court of the ,united  
,states in ,west ,virginia v4           
,environmental ,protection ,agency      
7#bjbb7 states that ,congress must speak
 clearly if ,congress wishes to assign  
to an agency decisions of vast economic 
and political significance2  7#b7       

,congress has not provided the          
,environmental ,protection ,agency with 
authorization for the proposed rule of  
the ,environmental ,protection ,agency  
entitled ,new ,source ,performance      
,standards for ,greenhouse ,gas         
,emissions ,from ,new1 ,modified1 and   
,reconstructed ,fossil ,fuel-,fired     
,electric ,generating ,units2 ,emission 
,guidelines for ,greenhouse ,gas        
,emissions ,from ,existing ,fossil      
,fuel-,fired ,electric ,generating      
,units2 and ,repeal of the ,affordable  
,clean ,energy ,rule 7#hh ,fed4 ,reg4   
#ccbdj 7,may #bc1 #bjbc771 a proposed   
rule that is intended to completely     
reshape the electricity grid and        
therefore has vast economic and         
political significance2  7#c7 section   
#aaa of the ,clean ,air ,act 7#db       
,u4,s4,c4 #gdaa7 requires the best      
system of emission reduction to be      
adequately demonstrated2  7#d7 the      
carbon capture and clean hydrogen       
technologies proposed as the best system

 of emission reduction have not been    
commercially utilized1 are not          
cost-effective1 and are not feasible1   
and are therefore not adequately        
demonstrated2 and  7#e7 the proposed    
rule described in paragraph 7#b7 is an  
illegal interpretation of section #aaa  
of the ,clean ,air ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4  
#gdaa7 and has not been authorized by   
that section or any other provision of  
,federal law4  #c4 ,proposed new source 
performance standards and emissions     
guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions 
from certain stationary sources ,the    
,administrator of the ,environmental    
,protection ,agency may not finalize1   
implement1 or enforce the proposed rule 
of the ,environmental ,protection       
,agency entitled ,new ,source           
,performance ,standards for ,greenhouse 
,gas ,emissions ,from ,new1 ,modified1  
and ,reconstructed ,fossil ,fuel-,fired 
,electric ,generating ,units2 ,emission 
,guidelines for ,greenhouse ,gas        
,emissions ,from ,existing ,fossil      

,fuel-,fired ,electric ,generating      
,units2 and ,repeal of the ,affordable  
,clean ,energy ,rule 7#hh ,fed4 ,reg4   
#ccbdj 7,may #bc1 #bjbc77 or a          
substantially similar rule4