,,iv #aah? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #feb ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,augu/ #aa1 #bjbc ,mr4 ,/eube submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ! ,judici>y ,,resolution ,impea*+ ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 ,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 = high crimes & misdemeanors4 ,t ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 ,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 is impea*$ = high crimes & misdemeanors1 & t ! foll[+ articles ( impea*m5t be exhibit$ to ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,s5ate3 ,articles ( impea*m5t exhibit$ by ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica 9 ! "n ( itself & ( ! p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 aga9/ ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 ,presid5t ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates ( ,am]ica1 9 ma9t5ance & support ( its impea*m5t aga9/ him = high crimes & misdemeanors4 ,article ,i3 ,abuse ( ,p[]1 ,brib]y1 ,hobbs ,,act ,extortion ,hone/ ,s]vices ,fraud ,rob]t ,hunt] ,bid5 7,hunt] ,bid57 & ,james ,bid5 sold access to !n ,vice ,presid5t ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 7,joe ,bid57 :ile he 0 9 (fice f #bjji to #bjag & sold promis$ access to a future ,bid5 ,presid5tial ,adm9i/ration :ile he 0 out ( (fice f #bjag to #bjba4 ,hunt] & ,james ,bid5 appe> to h promis$ (ficial actions by ,joe ,bid5 9 return = paym5ts & bus9ess opportunities f =eign & dome/ic bus9ess p>tn]s4 ,joe ,bid5 assi/$ by mak+ appe>ances1 phone calls1 meet+ ) ! bus9ess p>tn]s1 & kn[+ly all[+ 8 family memb]s to promise access to him & actions by him 9 fur!rance ( ^! s*emes4 ,hunt] ,bid5 ?reat5$ bus9ess p>tn]s t (ficial actions c\ld be tak5 aga9/ !m if !y did n meet t]ms or make paym5ts4 ,9 at lea/ "o in/ance1 ,hunt] impli$ t ,joe ,bid5 0 aw>e ( ^! ?reats & will+ to assi/ 9 en=c+ ! ?reats1 pot5tially ?r\gh (ficial actions4 ,hunt] ,bid5 attempt$ to enri* himself & ! ,bid5 family by ?reat5+ (ficial actions f 8 fa!r1 :o he claims 0 will+ to assi/ 9 ^! s*emes4 ,^! acts are abuses ( p[] z well z ! foll[+ ,f$]al crimes or conspiracy to commit ! foll[+ ,f$]al crimes3 ,brib]y ( ,public ,(ficials1 #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #bja2 ,hobbs ,act ,extortion 8,"u ,color ( ,(ficial ,"r10 #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #aiea2 ,hone/ ,s]vices ,fraud relat+ to use ( (ficial position1 #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #acdf4 7#a7 ,accord+ to reports releas$ by ! ,u4,s4 ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives ,ov]sight & ,acc\ntability ,committee 7,ov]sight ,committee7 ,james ,bid5 promis$ access to a future ,bid5 ,adm9i/ration & 8! highe/ levels ( gov]nm5t0 & t 8 bro!r ,joe ,bid5 _h be5 made aw>e ( 8 bus9ess deal+s1 :i* w\ld be made pr(itable :5 x c\ld become "p ( ! ,bid5 plat=m4 ,james ,bid5 w\ld (t5 expla9 ov] ! phone t ,joe ,bid5 0 9 ! room ) him1 & ,james ,bid5 _h be5 expla9+ ! deal to him4 7#b7 ,also1 accord+ to reports releas$ by ! ,ov]sight ,committee1 ,hunt] ,bid51 ,james ,bid51 ,hallie ,bid51 & an unkn[n 8,bid50 & _! companies collectively receiv$ #a4c million 9 paym5ts f acc\nts relat$ to ,rob ,walk]1 a ,bid5 family associate4 ,on ,m>* #a1 #bjag1 less ?an two mon?s aft] ,vice ,presid5t ,joe ,bid5 left public (fice1 ,/ate ,en]gy ,,hk ,limit$1 a ,*9ese company1 wir$ #c million to ,rob ,walk]'s company4 ,! next day1 ! company wir$ #a1jfe1jjj to a company associat$ ) ,james ,gilli>1 ano!r ,bid5 family associate4 ,aft]w>ds1 ! ,bid5 family receiv$ approximately #a1jfe1jjj 9 paym5ts ov] a #c-mon? p]iod 9 diff]5t bank acc\nts4 ,f ! bank records1 x appe>s t ! ,bid5 family receiv$ approximately "o-?ird ( ! money obta9$ f wires f ,*9a4 7#c7 ,previ\sly1 9 a #bjaa email1 ,hunt] ,bid5 describ$ 8 value to ,*9ese inve/ors z 8ev]y?+ to d ) my la/ "n04 ,9 ano!r correspond5ce ) ,*9ese inve/ors1 ,hunt] said 8we %\ld be able to a*ieve a great deal4 ,j give me my m>*+ ord]s04 7#d7 ,9 #bjad ,russian olig>* ,el5a ,batur9a paid a company connect$ to ,hunt] ,bid5 ov] #c million4 ,also 9 #bjad1 ,el5a ,batur9a att5d$ a d9n] ) ,hunt] ,bid5 & ,joe ,bid5 9 ! ,georget[n neighborhood ( ,wa%+ton1 ,,dc4 ,notably1 ,elana ,batur9a1 "o ( ,russia's weal?ie/ individuals1 has n be5 includ$ 9 ! ,treasury ,dep>tm5t sanctions aga9/ _m ( ,russia's o!r weal?ie/ p4 7#e7 ,additionally1 ! ,bid5 family receiv$ improp] paym5ts f ,ukra9ian en]gy company ,burisma4 ,hunt] ,bid5 receiv$ millions ( doll>s 9 paym5ts f ,burisma f s]v+ on its bo>d4 ,^! paym5ts 7 made entirely bas$ on ,hunt] ,bid5's connections to ,joe ,bid5 & promis$ access to ,joe ,bid54 7#f7 ,9 #bjae1 !n ,vice ,presid5t ,joe ,bid5 att5d$ a d9n] 9 ! ,georget[n neighborhood ( ,wa%+ton1 ,,dc1 ) ,burisma executives & ,hunt] ,bid54 ,at ! "t1 ,hunt] 0 receiv+ ov] #hj1jjj a mon? f ,burisma bas$ on no o!r reason ?an access to 8 fa!r4 7#g7 ,sev]al (ficials 9 ! ,obama ,adm9i/ration specifically flagg$ ^! paym5ts f ,burisma to ,hunt] ,bid5 z corrupt4 ,9 e>ly #bjae1 ! =m] ,act+ ,deputy ,*ief ( ,mission at ! ,u4,s4 ,embassy 9 ,kyiv1 ,ukra9e1 ,george ,k5t1 rais$ conc]ns to (ficials 9 ,vice ,presid5t ,joe ,bid5's (fice ab\t ! p]ception ( a conflict ( int]e/ ) respect to ,hunt] ,bid5's role on ,burisma's bo>d4 ,9 ,octob] #bjae1 s5ior ,/ate ,dep>tm5t (ficial ,amos ,ho*/e9 rais$ conc]ns ) ,vice ,presid5t ,bid51 z well z ) ,hunt] ,bid51 t ,hunt] ,bid5's position on ,burisma's bo>d enabl$ ,russian dis9=mation ef=ts & risk$ und]m9+ ,u4,s4 policy 9 ,ukra9e4 7#h7 ,9 an ,augu/ #bjbc int]view1 ,devon ,ar*]1 a bus9ess p>tn] ( ,hunt] ,bid51 said claims t ,joe ,bid5 0 n involv$ 9 ,hunt]'s bus9ess deals ) =eign p>tn]s 7 false4 7#i7 ,9 te/imony be=e ,congress1 ,devon ,ar*] admitt$ t ,burisma w\ld h likely gone out ( bus9ess _h x n be5 = ! ,bid5 br& be+ atta*$ to x4 ,he also te/ifi$ t ,bid5 0 r\t9ely put on conf]5ce calls ) ,hunt] ,bid5's =eign associates to 8sell ! br&04 ,article ,,ii3 ,ob/ruction ( ,ju/ice ,accord+ to te/imony f ,,irs :i/lebl[]s1 memb]s ( ! ,bid5 campaign collud$ ) ,ju/ice ,dep>tm5t 7,,doj7 (ficials to improp]ly int]f]e ) inve/igations into tax crimes alleg$ to h be5 committ$ by ,hunt] ,bid54 ,^! acts con/itute an abuse ( p[] z well z ,ob/ruction ( ,ju/ice1 #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #aeje1 #aeaj1 #aeab4 7#a7 ,aft] ,joe ,bid5 became ! presumptive ,democrat ,nom9ee 9 #bjbj1 c>e] ,,doj (ficials began /all+ ! ,hunt] ,bid5 inve/igations 9 ,delaw>e4 ,?is cont9u$ into ! ,bid5 ,adm9i/ration4 7#b7 ,,doj took unusual /eps su* z remov+ ,hunt] ,bid5's "n f w>rants & c\rt fil+s4 7#c7 ,,doj refus$ to pursue se>* w>rants or evid5ce conta9$ at ,joe ,bid5's gue/ h\se4 7#d7 ,,doj refus$ to pursue se>* w>rants 9 g5]al aga9/ ,hunt] ,bid5 ev5 ?\gh legal requirem5ts _h be5 met4 7#e7 ,,fbi & ,,irs ag5ts prep>$ = int]views ) multiple subjects includ+ ,hunt] ,bid5 on ,decemb] #h1 #bjbj4 ,^! 7 to be unann\nc$ int]views :]e ! ag5ts %[$ up & ask$ que/ions if ! subjects 7 will+ to answ]4 ,,fbi or ,,doj (ficials tipp$ (f ! ,bid5 transition team4 ,z a result1 ,hunt] ,bid5's attorney became involv$ & mo/ ( ! int]views did n proce$ z plann$4 7#f7 ,,doj made decisions relat+ to =mal actions1 su* z v5ue & fil+ *>ges1 & relat$ to int]nal review processes t 7 out ( ! ord9>y dur+ ! ,hunt] ,bid5 case4 ,! ,,irs :i/lebl[] indicat$ ^! actions 7 unlike actions tak5 9 any o!r case he _h work$ on4 ,he indicat$ t ^! unusual /eps all began aft] ,bid5 became ! presumptive #bjbj ,democrat nom9ee4 ,article ,,iii3 ,fraud ,james ,bid5 recruit$ 8inve/ors0 = bus9ess v5tures t ultimately fail$4 ,!re is evid5ce to sugge/ t ^! inve/m5t opportunities 7 sold to inve/ors bas$ on false & fraudul5t pret5ses & promises4 ,access to ,joe ,bid5 & indications t ,joe ,bid5 support$ ^! s*emes 7 us$ to lure inve/ors into ! s*emes4 ,^! acts con/itute fraud or conspiracy to commit fraud 9 violation ( #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #aidc1 #aidi4 7#a7 ,specifically1 9 #bjai an ,am]ican bus9ess1 ,am]icore ,heal?1 ,,llc1 p>tn]$ ) ,james ,bid5 to help lead ! company & develop bus9ess ?r\gh 8 political connections4 ,am]icore 0 9 ! bus9ess ( pur*as+ & improv+ ! effici5cy ( rural hospitals4 ,james approa*$ v>i\s bus9esses 9 ! m$ical field ar\nd ! c\ntry to ent] into bus9ess p>tn]%ips ) him &_/or ,am]icore ,heal? 9 return = exp&+ ! size & rea* ( ^? bus9esses4 ,accord+ to "o witness1 ,james alleg$ly promis$ bo? ,am]icore & inve/ors millions ( doll>s t he claim$ v>i\sly to be com+ f ! ,middle ,ea/1 ,russia1 or ,*9a4 ,h[ev]1 ! bus9ess own]s 7 cut out ( ! deals z ,james ga9$ k ( _! op]ations4 ,james deceiv$ inve/ors & attempt$ to abscond ) propriet>y processes to enri* himself by deliv]+ ! in=mation to ,turki% inve/ors4 7#b7 ,)\t ! 8,bid5 ,br&40 promise ( access to ,joe ,bid51 or ! appe>ance ( ,joe ,bid5's support ( ?is v5ture1 ,james ,bid5 w\ld n h be5 able to secure inve/ors or bus9ess p>tn]s = ?is v5ture4 ,joe ,bid5 r\t9ely all[$ & actively assi/$ 8 family 9 us+ 8 "n & ! promise ( access to him to secure bus9ess = ! family4 ,fur!rmore1 ,joe ,bid5 mix$ & com+l$ 8 f9ances ) ! re/ ( 8 family dur+ ?is "t p]iod & likely f9ancially b5efit$ f ?is s*eme4 ,article ,,iv3 ,f9ancial ,involvem5t 9 ,drug & ,pro/itution ,activities ,joe ,bid5 & ,hunt] ,bid5 h a long hi/ory ( com+l$ & int]tw9$ f9ances4 ,betwe5 #bjaj & #bjai ?\s&s ( doll>s ( ,bid5 family money 0 sp5t on illegal drug transactions & pro/itution4 ,^! acts con/itute violations ( or conspiracy to violate f$]al drug laws at #ba ,u4,s4,c4 #hda1 #hdb1 #hdc1 #hdf & f$]al pro/itution laws at #ah ,u4,s4,c4 #bdba1 #bdba;,a1 #bdbb4 7#a7 #bjaj emails betwe5 ,hunt] ,bid5 & bus9ess associate ,eric ,s*w]9 ref]5ce ,hunt] pay+ bills on behalf ( ,joe ,bid5 & manag+ ,joe ,bid5's f9ances4 7#b7 #bjah texts betwe5 ,hunt] ,bid5 & 8 daught] ref]5c$ ,hunt] ,bid5 s5d+ half 8 sal>y to ,joe ,bid5 & pay+ mu* ( ! family's bills4 7#c7 ,a #bjah text f ,hunt] ,bid5 ref]5ces a %>$ bank acc\nt ) ,joe ,bid54 7#d7 ,hunt] ,bid5 r\t9ely receiv$ money f & s5t money to ,joe ,bid54 7#e7 ,bo? ,hunt] & ,joe ,bid5 _h _! f9ances l>gely manag$ by bus9ess associate ,eric ,s*w]91 :o w\ld write *ecks f "o ,bid5 on behalf ( ! o!r & r\t9ely int]m+l$ _! f9ances4 7#f7 ,betwe5 ,novemb] #bjah & ,m>* #bjai1 a ,florida /ud5t nam$ ,anna ,dekhti> receiv$ ov] #bgd1hgc 9 paym5ts flagg$ z suspici\s activity by a ,suspici\s ,activity ,report4 ,! money came f eight s5d]s1 includ+ ,hunt] ,bid5's company ,owasco1 ,p4,c4 ,additionally1 two ( ! o!r depositors 7 wom5 t text messages f\nd on ,hunt] ,bid5's laptop sugge/ 7 pro/itutes t he hir$4 ,"s ( ^! funds 7 !n s5t onto 8,moreva10 a company t ,hunt] ,bid5 paid to hire pro/itutes4 7#g7 ,betwe5 ,novemb] #bjah & ,m>* #bjai1 ,hunt] ,bid5 appe>s to h sp5t at lea/ #cj1jjj doll>s on pro/itutes4 7#h7 ,9 ,decemb] #bjah1 ,hunt] ,bid5 book$ tra9 tickets = ?ree pro/itutes f ,bo/on to ,new ,york :]e he 0 /ay+4 7#i7 ,9 #bjah ,hunt] ,bid5 attempt$ to write (f paym5ts to pro/itutes & a sex club z tax d$uctions4 7#aj7 ,9 ,may #bjah1 ,hunt] ,bid5 wir$ a pro/itute #be1jjj4 ,he receiv$ a text f an ex-,secret ,s]vice ag5t :o he & 8 fa!r _h hir$ = private security ask+ ab\t ! transaction4 ,! ag5t al]t$ ,hunt] t he 0 gett+ calls 8f ,,dc0 ab\t ! transaction & t !re 0 8a l9k0 to 8 fa!r's acc\nt4 7#aa7 ,hunt] ,bid5 has on num]\s occasions admitt$ r\t9e drug use betwe5 ! ye>s ( #bjaj & #bjah4 ,!re are num]\s images1 videos1 & electronic communications t support ?is claim4 ,8 drug use necessitat$ ! r\t9e pur*ase ( l>ge doll> am\nts ( illegal drugs4 7#ab7 ,9 a record$ phone call betwe5 ,hunt] ,bid5 & ,hallie ,bid5 78 si/]-9-law turn$ lov]7 drug pur*ases 7 discuss$ & /rategiz$4 7#ac7 ,9 o!r electronic communications1 previ\s drug pur*ases are ref]5c$4 7#ad7 ,giv5 ! int]m+l$ f9ances ( ,joe ,bid5 & ,hunt] ,bid51 ,joe ,bid5 f9ancially support$ & %\ld h be5 aw>e ( ^! drug transactions & pro/itutions transactions4 ,_m ( ^! transactions w\ld h occurr$ us+ acc\nts ) a nexus to ,joe ,bid54 ,9 all ( ?is1 ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 has und]m9$ ! integrity ( 8 (fice1 has br\ght disrepute on ! ,presid5cy1 has betray$ 8 tru/ z ,presid5t1 & has act$ 9 a mann] subv]sive ( ! rule ( law & ju/ice1 to ! manife/ injury ( ! p ( ! ,unit$ ,/ates4 ,:]e=e1 ,joseph ,rob9ette ,bid51 ,jr41 by su* conduct1 w>rants impea*m5t & trial1 & removal f (fice & disqualification to hold & enjoy any (fice ( honor1 tru/1 or pr(it "u ! ,unit$ ,/ates4