,,iv  #aahth ,,congress  #ast ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #egg  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of
 ,,representatives  ,july #aa1 #bjbc,mr4
 ,gaetz 7for himself1 ,ms4 ,greene of   
,georgia1 ,mr4 ,gosar1 ,mr4 ,massie1    
,mr4 ,crane1 ,mr4 ,rosendale1 ,mr4      
,biggs1 and ,mrs4 ,luna7 submitted the  
following resolution2 which was referred
 to the ,committee on the ,judiciary1   
and in addition to the ,permanent       
,select ,committee on ,intelligence1 for
 a period to be subsequently determined 
by the ,speaker1 in each case for       
consideration of such provisions as fall
 within the jurisdiction of the         
committee concerned  ,,resolution       
,expressing the sense of the ,house of  
,representatives that authorities under 
section #gjb of the ,foreign            
,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of     
#aigh should be allowed to expire4      
,whereas section #gjb of the ,foreign   
,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of     
#aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahha;a7 was added 
by the ,,fisa ,amendments ,act of #bjjh 

7,public ,law #aaj-bfa2 #abb ,stat4     
#bdch72 ,whereas the ,,fisa ,amendments 
,reauthorization ,act of #bjag extended 
section #gjb authorities until ,december
 #ca1 #bjbc2 ,whereas absent            
congressional action1 section #gjb      
authorities will sunset at the end of   
the year2 ,whereas the ,intelligence    
,community has not been forthright about
 its use of section #gjb authorities    
over the #ae years that section #gjb has
 been authorized2 ,whereas both ,houses 
of ,congress have repeatedly sought to  
exercise their constitutional1 article  
,i authority to conduct oversight of    
executive branch use of section #gjb    
authorities1 and the ,department of     
,justice1 including the ,federal ,bureau
 of ,investigation 7,,fbi71 has         
repeatedly and over multiple            
,congresses1 failed to produce lawfully 
requested documents and witnesses to    
both ,houses of ,congress2 ,whereas what
 information ,congress has related to   
section #gjb authorities is often       

obtained from news reports1             
whistleblower materials1 and even when  
produced is often heavily redacted2     
,whereas what data ,congress have on    
section #gjb practice are often         
incomplete1 in part due to the          
,department of ,justice itself failing  
for #ba months to comply with the plain 
language of section #aab of the ,,fisa  
,amendments ,reauthorization ,act of    
#bjag1 mandating that the agency keep a 
count of its section #gjb queries of    
,united ,states person data1 until two  
,federal courts held that they were     
required to do so2 ,whereas this        
,congress is aware of multiple abuses of
 the section #gjb data collection       
process through released court decisions
 and aggregated data1 which in itself is
 an adequate basis to sunset the        
program2 ,whereas the ,national         
,security ,agency acquires more than    
#bej1jjj1jjj internet communications    
every year pursuant to section #gjb2    
,whereas the ,,fbi itself has conducted 

#gjb queries with callous disregard of  
the privacy rights of ,americans1 as    
evidenced by a redacted ,foreign        
,intelligence ,surveillance ,court      
7,,fisc7 opinion of ,april #ba1 #bjbb1  
including--  7#a7 by conducting queries 
using #f1hjj ,social ,security numbers2 
7#b7 by running a batch query in ,june  
#bjbj of unminimized ,,fisa information 
using identifiers of #acc individuals   
arrested in connection with civil unrest
 and protests between approximately ,may
 #cj1 and ,june #ah1 #bjbj without any  
specific potential connections to       
terrorist related activity known to     
those who conducted the queries2  7#c7  
by conducting a batch query for over    
#ai1jjj donors to a congressional       
campaign2  7#d7 by regularly querying   
queried unminimized ,,fisa information  
using identifiers of individuals listed 
in local police homicide reports1       
including victims1 family members1      
witnesses1 and suspects with no evidence
 of criminal activity2  7#e7 by         

conducting batch queries consisting of  
#bc1acb separate queries1 using presumed
 ,united ,states-person query terms1 and
 running said queries against           
unminimized section #gjb information1   
although the ,,fbi analyst conducting   
the queries had no indications of       
foreign influence related to the query  
terms used2 and  7#f7 by conducting in  
excess of #bgh1jjj noncompliant queries 
of raw ,,fisa-acquired information2     
,whereas that ,,fisc court opinion      
concluded that across the ,,fbi1 the    
government has reported queries of raw  
,,fisa-acquired information as a part of
 routine baseline checks in order to    
determine whether there was any         
information regarding the subject of the
 query in ,,fbi holdings1 without a     
specific factual basis to believe the   
query was reasonably likely to return   
foreign intelligence information or     
evidence of a crime42 ,whereas current  
oversight work of the #aahth ,congress  
does evidence that this pattern of      

abuses1 in particular by the ,,fbi1 are 
not incidental1 but rather a pattern of 
behavior warranting the sunset of       
section #gjb2 ,whereas even ,,fisc      
,judge ,james ,e4 ,boasberg in a #bjah  
ruling observed that a large number of  
#gjb queries evidenceed a               
misunderstanding of the querying        
standard--or indifference toward it2    
,whereas numerous ,american             
intelligence1 law enforcement1 academic1
 and civil liberties groups have        
expressed sustained concern over the law
 and practice of section #gjb           
collection2 ,whereas there is no        
indication that traditional ,,fisa      
authorizations1 requiring a warrant1 are
 not up to the task of protecting       
,american national security while also  
protecting ,american civil liberties2   
,whereas traditional ,,fisa authorities 
are more protective of ,american civil  
liberties1 including--  7#a7 by         
requiring close involvement of article  
,,iii judges2  7#b7 by requiring        

approval both of the ,attorney ,general 
and a judge2  7#c7 by requiring an      
attestation that ordinary methods of    
information collection would not work1  
prior to having a warrant approved2 and 
7#d7 by having time limits on           
surveillance2 and  ,whereas no          
government component has ever provided  
evidence that section #gjb has produced 
better outcomes than traditional ,,fisa3
 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the 
sense of the ,house of ,representatives 
that the authorities under section #gjb 
of the ,foreign ,intelligence           
,surveillance ,act of #aigh should be   
allowed to expire at the end of this    
calendar year4