,i #aahth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #acac ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,march #a1 #bjbc,mr4 ,mooney 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,posey1 ,mr4 ,flood1 ,mr4 ,davidson1 ,mr4 ,emmer1 ,mr4 ,sessions1 ,mr4 ,rose1 ,mr4 ,ogles1 ,mr4 ,nunn of ,iowa1 ,mrs4 ,kim of ,california1 ,mr4 ,steil1 ,mr4 ,williams of ,texas1 ,mr4 ,fitzgerald1 ,mr4 ,huizenga1 ,mr4 ,loudermilk1 ,mr4 ,luetkemeyer1 ,mr4 ,kustoff1 ,mrs4 ,houchin1 ,mr4 ,barr1 and ,mr4 ,norman7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,financial ,services ,a ,,bill ,to enhance rulemaking requirements for the ,bureau of ,consumer ,financial ,protection1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,transparency in ,,cfpb ,cost-,benefit ,analysis ,act4 #b4 ,transparency in cost-benefit analysis ,section #ajbb7;b7 of the ,consumer ,financial ,protection ,act of #bjaj 7#ab ,u4,s4,c4 #eeab7;b77 is amended by adding at the end the following3 7#e7 ,additional rulemaking requirements 7,a7 ,in general ,each notice of proposed rulemaking issued by the ,bureau shall be published in its entirety in the ,federal ,register and shall include-- 7i7 a statement of the need for the proposed regulation2 7ii7 an examination of why the ,bureau must undertake the proposed regulation and why the private market1 ,state1 local1 or tribal authorities cannot adequately address the problem2 7iii7 an examination of whether the proposed regulation is duplicative1 inconsistent1 or incompatible with other ,federal regulations and orders2 7iv7 if the proposed regulation is found to be duplicative1 inconsistent1 or incompatible with other ,federal regulations and orders1 a discussion of-- 7,i7 why the proposed regulation is justified2 7,,ii7 how the proposed regulation can coexist with the existing regulations2 and 7,,iii7 how the ,bureau plans to reduce the regulatory burden associated with the duplicative1 inconsistent1 or incompatible proposed regulation2 7v7 a quantitative and qualitative assessment of all anticipated direct and indirect costs and benefits of the proposed regulation1 including-- 7,i7 compliance costs for all regulated entities1 including small businesses2 7,,ii7 effects on economic activity1 efficiency1 competition and capital formation2 7,,iii7 regulatory and administrative costs of implementation2 and 7,,iv7 costs imposed on ,state1 local and tribal entities2 7vi7 an identification of reasonable alternatives to the regulation1 including modification of an existing regulation2 7vii7 an analysis of the costs and benefits1 both quantitative and qualitative1 of any alternative identified pursuant to clause 7v72 7viii7 if the ,bureau determines the proposed regulation would increase costs for small businesses1 then the ,bureau shall consult the ,office of ,advocacy within the ,small ,business ,administration to determine ways to minimize the effect of direct and indirect costs imposed on small businesses by the proposed regulation2 7ix7 if quantified net benefits of the proposed action do not outweigh the quantified net benefits of the alternatives1 a justification of the regulation2 7x7 if quantified benefits identified pursuant to clause 7iv7 do not outweigh the quantified costs of the regulation1 a justification of the regulation2 7xi7 an assessment of how the burden imposed by the regulation will be distributed2 including whether consumers1 or small businesses will be disproportionately burdened2 and 7xii7 when feasible1 and using appropriate statistical techniques1 a probability distribution of the relevant outcomes of the proposed regulation4 7,b7 ,assumptions and studies used ,with respect to the information required to be included under subparagraph 7,a71 the ,bureau will include-- 7i7 a discussion of underlying assumptions used as a basis for such information2 and 7ii7 a description of any studies or data used in preparing such information1 and whether such studies were peer-reviewed4 4