,,iii #aagth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #gje ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,july #ac1 #bjbb,mrs4 ,blackburn 7for herself1 ,mr4 ,lee1 ,mr4 ,hagerty1 ,mr4 ,risch1 ,mr4 ,crapo1 ,mr4 ,inhofe1 ,mr4 ,braun1 ,mr4 ,wicker1 ,ms4 ,ernst1 ,mr4 ,young1 ,mr4 ,rubio1 ,mr4 ,scott of ,florida1 ,mr4 ,cruz1 ,mr4 ,thune1 ,mr4 ,cramer1 ,mrs4 ,hyde-,smith1 and ,mr4 ,marshall7 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,,resolution ,congratulating the pro-life movement on its historic victory in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization4 ,whereas the decision of the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states 7referred to in this preamble as the ,supreme ,court7 in ,roe v4 ,wade1 #daj ,u4,s4 #aac 7#aigc71 was a blatant act of judicial activism that invented a constitutional right to abortion out of whole cloth1 with no grounding in the text of the ,constitution of the ,united ,states2 ,whereas more than #fc1jjj1jjj babies have been aborted in the ,united ,states since the decision of the ,supreme ,court in ,roe v4 ,wade2 ,whereas the decision in ,roe v4 ,wade caused great damage to the democratic system of the ,united ,states by preventing citizens of the ,united ,states from making decisions about the legality of abortion and instead putting these decisions in the hands of unelected ,federal judges2 ,whereas1 far from settling the issue of abortion in the ,united ,states1 the decision of the ,supreme ,court in ,roe v4 ,wade has exacerbated social tensions1 inflamed the politics of the ,united ,states1 disrupted the democratic processes of the ,united ,states1 and divided the people of the ,united ,states2 ,whereas1 in the aftermath of the decision of the ,supreme ,court in ,roe v4 ,wade1 millions of volunteers1 nonpartisan organizations1 and lawmakers came together with a shared voice to stand up for the rights of the unborn1 who are the most vulnerable among us2 ,whereas these supporters of the pro-life movement come from diverse backgrounds1 with the shared goal of building a society that celebrates1 protects1 and cherishes life at all stages2 ,whereas the pro-life movement has worked tirelessly over the last #e decades to reverse the legally unsound and destructive ruling in ,roe v4 ,wade and to ensure that the human dignity of every person is protected by law1 regardless of age1 background1 or belief2 ,whereas the work of the pro-life movement has been more than simply advocating for the ,supreme ,court to overturn ,roe v4 ,wade and often occurs behind the scenes1 with little recognition of the time and talent that countless individuals have invested in the effort to protect life2 ,whereas millions of people in the ,united ,states have contributed to the cultivation of a culture of life in the ,united ,states by marching for life on the streets of cities in the ,united ,states1 engaging in sidewalk counseling outside abortion clinics1 providing resources for expectant mothers1 raising money and volunteering their time for crisis pregnancy centers1 adopting and fostering children1 advocating for life-affirming legislation in every ,state1 and submitting amicus briefs in abortion-related cases at the ,state and ,federal level2 ,whereas1 on ,june #bd1 #bjbb1 the ,supreme ,court issued its decision in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization1 ,no4 #ai-acib1 #bjbb ,,wl #bbgfhjh 7#bjbb71 which overturned ,roe v4 ,wade and affirmed that there is no ,federal constitutional right to an abortion2 ,whereas the decision in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization represents a historic victory for the sanctity of life and for the millions of people in the ,united ,states who have worked diligently over the last #e decades to foster a culture of life in the ,united ,states2 ,whereas the decision of the ,supreme ,court in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization does not ban abortion but instead recognizes that under the constitutional system of the ,united ,states1 the power and the duty to decide whether to permit or limit abortions lies with the ,states1 not unelected ,federal judges2 ,whereas1 as the late ,justice ,scalia recognized #c decades ago in his dissent in ,planned ,parenthood of ,southeastern ,pennsylvania v4 ,casey1 #eje ,u4,s4 #hcc 7#aiib71 8,the permissibility of abortion1 and the limitations upon it1 are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy3 by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting402 and ,whereas the decision of the ,supreme ,court in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization returns the issue of abortion back to the ,states1 for the people of each ,state to debate and then vote3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that the ,senate-- 7#a7 congratulates the pro-life movement and the millions of individuals who have stood up for life over the last nearly #ej years on this historic victory in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization2 7#b7 celebrates the courage1 compassion1 and commitment of the millions of individuals1 nonpartisan organizations1 and lawmakers who have advocated for life and labored tirelessly to overturn ,roe v4 ,wade2 7#c7 lauds the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states for the decision to return to the original understanding of the ,constitution of the ,united ,states and recognize that there is no ,federal constitutional right to an abortion2 7#d7 recognizes the uniqueness of the political system of the ,united ,states1 in which our ,states function as laboratories of democracy1 enabling citizens to debate issues like abortion in the public square and make their voices heard by voting2 7#e7 affirms the commitment of ,congress to ensuring the safety of supporters of the pro-life movement1 including lawful demonstrators1 volunteers1 religious clergy1 and crisis pregnancy center personnel1 as they continue to advocate for the sanctity of every human life in all #ej ,states2 and 7#f7 condemns all threats and incidents of violence fueled by the decision of the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states in ,dobbs v4 ,jackson ,women's ,health ,organization and affirms the commitment of ,congress to ensuring the safety of justices of the ,supreme ,court1 their law clerks1 other ,state and ,federal judges and their law clerks1 members of ,congress1 and ,state lawmakers4