,,ii ,calendar ,no4 #fa #aagth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 #iba ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,march #bc1 #bjba,mr4 ,cornyn 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,coons1 ,mr4 ,grassley1 ,mr4 ,leahy1 ,mr4 ,cotton1 ,mr4 ,whitehouse1 ,mr4 ,hawley1 ,mr4 ,tillis1 ,mr4 ,durbin1 ,mr4 ,lee1 ,mr4 ,cruz1 ,mrs4 ,feinstein1 ,mr4 ,blumenthal1 and ,ms4 ,cortez ,masto7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,may #bj1 #bjba,reported by ,mr4 ,durbin1 with an amendment,strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic ,a ,,bill ,to amend title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to further protect officers and employees of the ,united ,states1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,jaime ,zapata and ,victor ,avila ,federal ,law ,enforcement ,protection ,act4 #b4 ,sense of ,congress ,it is the sense of ,congress that-- 7#a7 since the founding of the ,nation1 officers and employees of the ,united ,states ,government have dutifully and faithfully served the ,united ,states overseas1 including in situations that place them at serious risk of death or bodily harm1 in order to preserve1 protect1 and defend the interests of the ,united ,states2 7#b7 securing the safety of such officers and employees while serving overseas is of paramount importance and is also in furtherance of preserving1 protecting1 and defending the interests of the ,united ,states2 7#c7 ,federal courts1 including the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,second ,circuit1 the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,ninth ,circuit1 and the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,eleventh ,circuit1 have correctly interpreted section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to apply extraterritorially to protect officers and employees of the ,united ,states while the officers and employees are serving abroad2 7#d7 in a case involving a violent attack against ,federal law enforcement officers ,jaime ,zapata and ,victor ,avila1 a panel of a ,federal court of appeals held that section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 does not apply extraterritorially1 creating a split among the ,united ,states circuit courts of appeals2 and 7#e7 in light of the opinion described in paragraph 7#d71 it has become necessary for ,congress to clarify the original intent that section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 applies extraterritorially4 #c4 ,protection of officers and employees of the ,united ,states ,section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended-- 7#a7 by inserting 7a7 ,in general4-- before ,whoever2 and 7#b7 by adding at the end the following3 7b7 ,extraterritorial jurisdiction ,there is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section4 4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,jaime ,zapata and ,victor ,avila ,federal ,officers and ,employees ,protection ,act4 #b4 ,sense of ,congress ,it is the sense of ,congress that-- 7#a7 since the founding of the ,nation1 officers and employees of the ,united ,states ,government have dutifully and faithfully served the ,united ,states overseas1 including in situations that place them at serious risk of death or bodily harm1 in order to preserve1 protect1 and defend the interests of the ,united ,states2 7#b7 securing the safety of such officers and employees while serving overseas is of paramount importance and is also in furtherance of preserving1 protecting1 and defending the interests of the ,united ,states2 7#c7 ,federal courts1 including the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,second ,circuit1 the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,ninth ,circuit1 and the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,eleventh ,circuit1 have correctly interpreted section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 to apply extraterritorially to protect officers and employees of the ,united ,states while the officers and employees are serving abroad2 7#d7 in a case involving a violent attack against ,federal law enforcement officers ,jaime ,zapata and ,victor ,avila1 a panel of a ,federal court of appeals held that section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 does not apply extraterritorially1 creating a split among the ,united ,states circuit courts of appeals2 7#e7 in light of the opinion described in paragraph 7#d71 it has become necessary for ,congress to clarify the original intent that section #aaad of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 applies extraterritorially2 and 7#f7 it is further appropriate to clarify the original intent that sections #aaa and #aae of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 apply extraterritorially as well4 #c4 ,protection of officers and employees of the ,united ,states ,part ,i of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended-- 7#a7 in section #aaa1 by adding at the end the following3 7c7 ,extraterritorial jurisdiction ,there is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section4 2 7#b7 in section #aae1 by adding at the end the following3 7e7 ,there is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section4 2 and 7#c7 in section #aaad-- 7,a7 by inserting 7a7 ,in general4-- before ,whoever2 and 7,b7 by adding at the end the following3 7b7 ,extraterritorial jurisdiction ,there is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section4 4 ,may #bj1 #bjba,reported with an amendment