,,ii #aagth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 #bedg ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,july #bi1 #bjba,mr4 ,wyden 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,tillis1 and ,mr4 ,whitehouse7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,a ,,bill ,to improve the procedures for the authentication and the secure and tamper-evident delivery and transmission of certain court orders4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba4 #b4 ,findings ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,in recent years1 criminals have created counterfeit court orders which they have used to trick telecommunications and technology companies into performing illegal wiretaps and removing online content4 7#b7 ,counterfeit court orders threaten public trust in the courts1 and undermine the privacy of the people of the ,united ,states and their rights under the ,first ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states4 7#c7 ,secure digital signature technology has existed for decades that solves this problem4 ,digital signatures enable recipients of a digital document to verify that it was issued by an authorized entity and that it has not been tampered with or modified since it was digitally signed4 7#d7 ,since #aiid1 the ,national ,institute of ,standards and ,technology has published ,federal ,information ,processing ,standard #ahf-d1 which is the official standard for digital signatures for the ,federal ,government4 7#e7 ,since #aiih1 the ,government ,paperwork ,elimination ,act 7title ,,xvii of division ,c of ,public ,law #aje-bgg2 #aab ,stat4 #bfha-gdi7 and the amendments made by that ,act have required ,federal executive branch agencies use digital signatures to conduct official business with the public4 7#f7 ,section #bbji of the ,homeland ,security ,act of #bjjb 7#f ,u4,s4,c4 #fei71 as amended by section #agaf of the ,william ,m4 7,mac7 ,thornberry ,national ,defense ,authorization ,act for ,fiscal ,year #bjba1 requires that subpoenas issued by the ,cybersecurity and ,infrastructure ,security ,agency be authenticated with a cryptographic digital signature and that subpoenas lacking such a digital signature shall not be considered to be valid by the recipient of such subpoena4 7#g7 ,the legislative branch has also embraced digital signatures4 ,every bill posted to congress4gov is digitally signed by the ,government ,publishing ,office4 7#h7 ,federal1 ,state1 and ,tribal courts have not kept pace with the adoption of digital signature technology by other branches of government4 7#i7 ,illegal wiretaps by their nature involve the interception of private communications that flow over means or instrumentalities of interstate or foreign commerce4 7#aj7 ,content and data delivered over the internet is a thing in interstate or foreign commerce4 ,to the extent that a counterfeit court order would result in that content being removed from the internet1 that counterfeit order affects things in interstate and foreign commerce4 ,congress may therefore take steps to ensure the authenticity of orders purporting to require the removal of online content in interstate or foreign commerce4 7#aa7 ,consumers will not continue to do business with telecommunications and technology companies if those companies facilitate surveillance of their private communications or remove their content in response to fraudulent court orders4 7#ab7 ,the absence of digital signatures from court orders places an unreasonable economic burden on telecommunications and technology companies4 ,these companies must either expend significant effort and resources to manually verify the legitimacy of each court order they receive or bear the risk of significant reputational and financial harm4 7#ac7 ,the absence of verifiable digital signatures on court orders therefore creates an unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce of the ,united ,states1 which ,congress has the power to remedy4 7#ad7 ,the adoption of digital signature technology by ,federal courts alone will not address the threat of counterfeiting4 ,criminals have created and passed off counterfeit ,state court orders and will continue to do so4 7#ae7 ,as such1 the legitimacy of and public trust in the courts depends upon every court1 ,federal1 ,state1 and ,tribal1 adopting digital signature technology4 #c4 ,definitions ,in this ,act-- 7#a7 the term appropriate committees of ,congress means-- 7,a7 the ,committee on the ,judiciary and the ,committee on ,appropriations of the ,senate2 and 7,b7 the ,committee on the ,judiciary and the ,committee on ,appropriations of the ,house of ,representatives2 7#b7 the term authorized court officer or employee means an officer or employee of a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court that is authorized by the ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court to digitally sign covered orders2 7#c7 the term contains an authentic digital signature1 with respect to a covered order1 means that the covered order contains a digital signature-- 7,a7 by an authorized court officer or employee of the ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court issuing the covered order2 7,b7 that-- 7i7 complies with the standards certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under section #d7;a77#a77;,a77ii72 or 7ii7 if the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts promulgates updated standards under section #d7;a77#a77;,b77ii71 on and after the date that is #a year after the date on which the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts promulgates a set of updated standards1 complies with such set of updated standards2 and 7,c7 that confirms that the covered order is authentic2 7#d7 the term covered order means an order-- 7,a7 directed to a person other than a party to the proceedings in which the order is entered2 and 7,b7 that is-- 7i7 an order authorizing or approving the interception of a wire communication1 oral communication1 or electronic communication under chapter #aai of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 or under an equivalent ,state law2 7ii7 an order authorizing or approving the installation and use of a pen register or a trap and trace device under chapter #bjf of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 or under an equivalent ,state law2 7iii7 an order for the installation of a mobile tracking device under section #caag of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code2 7iv7 an order for disclosure under chapter #aba of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code2 7v7 a search or seizure warrant issued using the procedures described in the ,federal ,rules of ,criminal ,procedure or in the case of a ,state or ,tribal court1 issued using ,state or ,tribal warrant procedures2 7vi7 in the case of a court-martial or other proceeding under chapter #dg of title #aj1 ,united ,states ,code 7,uniform ,code of ,military ,justice71 a warrant or order issued under section #hdf of that title2 7vii7 an order under section #afea of title #bh1 ,united ,states ,code2 7viii7 an order for third party assistance under section #beah7d7 or section #cabd of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code2 7ix7 an order to enforce the assistance capability and capacity requirements under section #bebb of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code2 7x7 an order under section #bgje7;b7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 prohibiting notifying other persons2 7xi7 an order authorizing electronic surveillance issued under section #aje of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahje72 7xii7 an order authorizing a physical search issued under section #cjd of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahbd72 7xiii7 an order requiring the production of tangible things issued under section #eja of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahfa72 7xiv7 an order authorizing an acquisition or targeting that is issued under title ,,vii of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahha et seq472 7xv7 an order issued under section #eab7;j7 of title #ag1 ,united ,states ,code2 7xvi7 an order requiring the removal or blocking of content published on the internet2 7xvii7 an order that permanently or temporarily seizes a domain name1 including by requiring the change of the registrar of record for the domain name or preventing the domain name from resolving to a particular internet protocol address2 or 7xviii7 any other type of order for which the ,judicial ,conference of the ,united ,states determines that the use of digital signatures would result in increased trust in the courts and reduce the risk and impact of fraudulent efforts to impersonate court orders2 7#e7 the term digital signature has the meaning given the term in section #hej4ajc of title #e1 ,code of ,federal ,regulations1 or any successor thereto2 7#f7 the term digital signature technology means cryptographic technology that allows a recipient of a covered court order to determine that the covered order-- 7,a7 was issued by a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court2 and 7,b7 has not been tampered with or modified since it was issued by the court2 7#g7 the term ,indian ,tribe has the meaning given such term in section #ajb of the ,federally ,recognized ,indian ,tribe ,list ,act of #aiid 7#be ,u4,s4,c4 #eacj72 7#h7 the term provider means an electronic communication service provider1 as defined in section #gja7;b7 of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahha7;b772 7#i7 the term ,state means each of the several ,states of the ,united ,states1 the ,district of ,columbia1 the ,commonwealth of ,puerto ,rico1 ,american ,samoa1 the ,commonwealth of the ,northern ,mariana ,islands1 ,guam1 and the ,united ,states ,virgin ,islands2 and 7#aj7 the term ,tribal means of or pertaining to an ,indian ,tribe4 #d4 ,ensuring authenticity and integrity of court orders affecting interstate commerce 7a7 ,standardized technology for digital signatures 7#a7 ,initial standards 7,a7 ,in general ,not later than #b years after the date of enactment of this ,act1 and in accordance with paragraph 7#b7-- 7i7 the ,director of the ,national ,institute of ,standards and ,technology shall develop proposed standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders1 which shall-- 7,i7 be based on open standards2 and 7,,ii7 facilitate audits to enable courts to identify whether cryptographic keys1 or an equally secure successor technology1 used to digitally authenticate covered orders have been lost1 stolen1 or misused2 and 7ii7 on the basis of the proposed standards developed under clause 7i71 the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts shall certify and promulgate standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders4 7,b7 ,updating ,in accordance with paragraph 7#b7-- 7i7 not later than #e years after developing proposed standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders under subparagraph 7,a77i71 and every #e years thereafter1 the ,director of the ,national ,institute of ,standards and ,technology shall update such standards2 and 7ii7 not later than #f months after receiving standards updated under clause 7i71 and on the basis of such standards1 the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts shall certify and promulgate updated standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders4 7#b7 ,consultation ,in developing or updating proposed standards and certifying and promulgating standards under paragraph 7#a71 the ,director of the ,national ,institute of ,standards and ,technology and the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts shall each consult with-- 7,a7 the ,attorney ,general2 7,b7 the ,director of the ,cybersecurity and ,infrastructure ,security ,agency2 7,c7 the ,administrator of ,general ,services2 7,d7 the ,director of the ,government ,publishing ,office2 7,e7 the ,national ,center for ,state ,courts2 7,f7 the ,national ,american ,indian ,court ,judges ,association2 7,g7 independent experts in cybersecurity2 7,h7 providers2 7,i7 private entities offering electronic case management software2 and 7,j7 the ,archivist of the ,united ,states4 7#c7 ,implementation assistance 7,a7 ,digital signature service 7i7 ,in general ,notwithstanding any limitations on the authority of the ,general ,services ,administration to provide services to ,state or ,tribal entities1 the ,administrator of ,general ,services shall offer a managed digital signature service to each ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court that will allow the court to digitally sign covered orders without the court having to hold and secure the long-term cryptographic keys used to digitally authenticate the covered orders1 or an equally secure successor technology4 7ii7 ,consultation ,the digital signature service offered under clause 7i7 shall be developed and implemented in consultation with the ,administrative ,office of ,united ,states ,courts1 the ,national ,center for ,state ,courts1 the ,national ,american ,indian ,court ,judges ,association1 the ,government ,publishing ,office1 and the ,director of the ,cybersecurity and ,infrastructure ,security ,agency4 7iii7 ,requirements ,the digital signature service offered under clause 7i7 shall be designed to-- 7,i7 permit an authorized court officer or employee of a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court to digitally sign covered orders from a court office and while teleworking2 and 7,,ii7 be continuously available for use4 7,b7 ,use ,if a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court elects to use the managed digital signature service offered under subparagraph 7,a71 the ,general ,services ,administration shall provide an online service1 available both through a publicly-documented and publicly-available application programming interface and through secure and public websites1 that enable authorized court officers and employees to digitally sign a covered order and recipients of a covered order and other third parties to verify that the covered order has a valid digital signature at no cost to the recipient or third party4 7,c7 ,no cost to courts ,the ,administrator of ,general ,services shall provide the managed digital signature service to ,federal1 ,state1 and ,tribal courts under this paragraph at no cost to the court4 7,d7 ,reimbursement ,the ,attorney ,general shall reimburse the ,administrator of ,general ,services for the costs of building1 operating1 and maintaining the managed digital signature service for ,federal1 ,state1 and ,tribal courts4 7b7 ,digital signature requirements for ,federal court orders 7#a7 ,in general 7,a7 ,piloting the use of digital signatures ,beginning not later than #b years after the date on which the standards are certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 not less than #a district court of the ,united ,states in each ,federal judicial circuit shall use digital signature technology that complies with the standards to authenticate all covered orders issued by that court4 7,b7 ,required use of digital signature technology 7i7 ,in general ,beginning not later than #d years after the date on which the standards are certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 each ,federal court shall use digital signature technology that complies with the standards to authenticate all covered orders issued by the court4 7ii7 ,updates ,not later than #a year after the date on which updated standards are certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under subsection 7a77#a77;,b77ii71 each ,federal court system shall update the digital signature technology used by the court to comply with the updated standards4 7,c7 ,plan for loss or theft ,each ,federal court using digital signature technology shall develop1 and update not less frequently than every #b years1 a written plan to respond to the loss or theft of the encryption keys1 access credentials1 or any successor technology used to digitally sign covered orders4 7#b7 ,mandatory use of digital signatures ,except as provided in subsections 7d7 and 7i71 on and after the date that is #f years after the date on which standards are certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 a ,federal court may not issue a covered order unless the covered order contains an authentic digital signature4 7c7 ,digital signature requirements for ,state and ,tribal court orders 7#a7 ,full faith and credit requirements ,section #agch of title #bh1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended-- 7,a7 by inserting 7a7 before ,the ,acts 2 7,b7 by inserting 7b7 before ,the records2 7,c7 by striking ,such ,acts1 and inserting 7c77#a7 ,except as provided in paragraph 7#b71 such ,acts12 and 7,d7 in subsection 7c71 as so designated1 by adding at the end the following3 7#b7 7,a7 ,in this paragraph1 the terms contains an authentic digital signature1 covered order1 digital signature1 ,state1 and ,tribal have the meanings given such terms in section #c of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba4 7,b7 ,a document purporting to be a covered order issued by a ,state or ,tribal court shall be entitled to full faith and credit only if-- 7i7 7,i7 the document contains an authentic digital signature2 7,,ii7 the document was served with a certificate of authenticity in accordance with section #d7;d77#a7 of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba2 or 7,,iii7 the document was issued pursuant to a waiver under section #d7;d77#b7 of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba2 and 7ii7 the ,state or ,tribal court includes with the document a statement certifying that the court has 7and has updated on or after the date that is #b years before the date on which the covered order is issued7 a written plan to respond to the loss or theft of the encryption keys1 access credentials1 or any successor technology used to digitally sign covered orders4 4 7#b7 ,wiretapping ,section #beaf7b7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended by striking ,the principal prosecuting attorney of any ,state and inserting ,if a ,state requires that an order described in this subsection issued by the ,state court contains an authentic digital signature 7as defined in section #c of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba71 the principal prosecuting attorney of that ,state4 7#c7 ,stored communications requirements ,chapter #aba of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended-- 7,a7 in section #bgjc1 by inserting and containing an authentic digital signature 7as defined in section #c of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba7 after warrant procedures each place it appears2 and 7,b7 in section #bgaa7c77;,b71 by inserting 1 if the court requires that each covered order issued by the court contains an authentic digital signature 7as such terms are defined in section #c of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba7 after search warrants4 7#d7 ,pen registers and trap and trace devices ,section #cabb7;a77#b7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended by inserting and if the ,state requires that such an order issued by the ,state court contains an authentic digital signature 7as defined in section #c of the ,digital ,authenticity for ,court ,orders ,act of #bjba71 after prohibited by ,state law14 7#e7 ,effective date ,except as provided in subsection 7i71 the amendments made by paragraphs 7#a7 through 7#d7 shall take effect on the date that is #f years after the date on which the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts certifies and promulgates standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii74 7d7 ,failure of digital signature technology 7#a7 ,individual courts ,if the digital signature technology of a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court is not operational1 upon request by an officer or employee of the ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court who is authorized to digitally sign covered orders1 and if the ,attorney ,general determines that a covered court order is authentic1 the ,attorney ,general may serve on the provider by personal service the covered court order and a certification stating that the covered court order is authentic4 7#b7 ,widespread outage 7,a7 ,in general ,if the digital signature technology of not less than #e ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal courts is not operational1 the ,chief ,justice of the ,united ,states may issue a waiver for a period of not more than #cj days that waives the application of each of the following3 7i7 ,the requirements under subsection 7b77#b7 with respect to ,federal courts4 7ii7 ,the limits on full faith and credit for covered orders issued by ,state and ,tribal courts under paragraph 7#b7 of section #agch7;c7 of title #bh1 ,united ,states ,code1 as added by subsection 7c7 of this section4 7,b7 ,renewals ,a waiver described in subparagraph 7,a7 may be renewed for additional periods of not more than #cj days4 7,c7 ,notice ,the ,chief ,justice of the ,united ,states shall submit to the appropriate committees of ,congress and make publicly available on the website of the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states notice of each waiver and renewal of a waiver under this paragraph4 7#c7 ,subsequent service of digitally signed order by ,federal courts ,if a covered order of a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court is served on a provider under paragraph 7#a7 or pursuant to a waiver under paragraph 7#b71 after the digital signature technology of the ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court is operational1 the party who obtained the initial order shall obtain and serve on the provider an identical covered order that meets the requirements under subsection 7b77#b7 or paragraph 7#b7 of section #agch7;c7 of title #bh1 ,united ,states ,code1 as applicable4 7#d7 ,information regarding failure of digital signature technology 7,a7 ,public list of nonoperational systems ,the ,attorney ,general shall make publicly available on the website of the ,department of ,justice a list of each ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court for which the digital signature technology is not operational1 which shall include-- 7i7 the period during which the ,attorney ,general approved #a or more covered court orders of the ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court under paragraph 7#a72 and 7ii7 information indicating the measures a provider can take to verify that a covered court order and certification served under paragraph 7#a7 are authentic4 7,b7 ,notice to ,congress ,if the digital signature technology of a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court is not operational for a period of not less than #aj days1 the ,attorney ,general shall notify the appropriate committees of ,congress4 7e7 ,limit on immunity provisions 7#a7 ,in general ,except as provided in subsection 7i71 on and after the date that is #f years after the date on which the standards are certified and promulgated by the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 the provisions of law described in paragraph 7#b7 of this subsection shall only apply with respect to the provision of documents1 data1 or other information by a provider that removes content or makes available documents1 data1 or other information in response to a document purporting to be a covered order issued by a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court if-- 7,a7 the document contains an authentic digital signature2 7,b7 7i7 the document was served with a certificate of authenticity in accordance with subsection 7d77#a72 and 7ii7 the provider-- 7,i7 verified that the court that issued the order is listed on the website of the ,department of ,justice as having nonoperational digital signature technology2 and 7,,ii7 takes the measures listed by the ,attorney ,general to verify that a covered court order and certification served under subsection 7d77#a7 are authentic2 or 7,c7 the document was issued pursuant to a waiver under subsection 7d77#b74 7#b7 ,provisions of law ,the provisions of law described in this paragraph are the following3 7,a7 ,section #eab of title #ag1 ,united ,states ,code4 7,b7 ,section #bebj7;d77#a7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code4 7,c7 ,section #bgjg7;e7 of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code4 7,d7 ,section #aje7;i7 of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahje7;i774 7,e7 ,section #djb7;f7 of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahdb7;f774 7,f7 ,section #gjb7;i77#c7 of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahha;a7i77#c774 7,g7 ,section #gjc7;e7 of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahha;b7e774 7,h7 ,title ,,viii of the ,foreign ,intelligence ,surveillance ,act of #aigh 7#ej ,u4,s4,c4 #ahhe et seq474 7f7 ,grants ,the ,administrative ,office of ,united ,states ,courts may make grants to ,state and ,tribal courts for the cost of implementing digital signature technology1 including to develop and implement training and educational resources1 in accordance with this ,act4 7g7 ,immunity 7#a7 ,in general ,except as provided in subsection 7i71 on and after the date that is #f years after the date on which the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts certifies and promulgates standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 a person may not be held liable in any ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal administrative1 civil1 or criminal proceeding1 including for contempt of court1 for failing to comply with a covered order issued by a ,federal1 ,state1 or ,tribal court1 respectively1 if the covered order does not meet one of the following requirements3 7,a7 ,the covered order contains an authentic digital signature4 7,b7 ,the covered order was served with a certificate of authenticity in accordance with subsection 7d77#a74 7,c7 ,the covered order was issued pursuant to a waiver under subsection 7d77#b74 7#b7 ,costs ,in any action brought to enforce compliance with a covered order that1 except as provided in subsection 7i71 was issued on or after the date that is #f years after the date on which the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts certifies and promulgates standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii71 if the court finds that the covered order does not meet the requirements described in subparagraph 7,a71 7,b71 or 7,c7 of paragraph 7#a7 of this subsection1 the court shall award to the person against whom the action was brought costs of litigation 7including reasonable attorney fees74 7h7 ,authorization of appropriations ,there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this ,act1 including for the ,administrative ,office of ,united ,states ,courts to make grants under subsection 7f7 and to upgrade the ,case ,management_/,electronic ,case ,files ,system of the ,federal ,courts4 7i7 ,delay of effective date ,the ,judicial ,conference of the ,united ,states may delay the effective dates under subsection 7b77#b71 subsection 7c77#c71 subsection 7e77#a7 and subsection 7g7 to be the date that is #h years after the date on which the ,director of the ,administrative ,office of the ,united ,states ,courts certifies and promulgates standards for the use of digital signature technology for covered orders under subsection 7a77#a77;,a77ii74 #e4 ,preemption ,this ,act and the amendments made by this ,act shall preempt any ,state or ,tribal law to the extent that such ,state law is inconsistent with a provision of this ,act or an amendment made by this ,act4 #f4 ,severability ,if any provision of this ,act1 an amendment made by this ,act1 or the application of such a provision or amendment to any person or circumstance1 is held to be unconstitutional1 the remaining provisions of and amendments made by this ,act1 and the application of the provision or amendment held to be unconstitutional to any other person or circumstance1 shall not be affected thereby4