,,iv #aagth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #ci ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,june #bi1 #bjba,ms4 ,speier 7for herself1 ,ms4 ,sherrill1 ,ms4 ,norton1 ,ms4 ,chu1 ,mrs4 ,carolyn ,b4 ,maloney of ,new ,york1 ,mrs4 ,trahan1 ,mrs4 ,lawrence1 ,mr4 ,cicilline1 ,mr4 ,lowenthal1 ,mr4 ,mc,govern1 ,ms4 ,meng1 ,ms4 ,ross1 ,mr4 ,levin of ,michigan1 ,ms4 ,jayapal1 ,mr4 ,kahele1 and ,ms4 ,schakowsky7 submitted the following concurrent resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,education and ,labor ,,concurrent ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of ,congress that title ,,ix of the ,education ,amendments of #aigb applies to the ,national ,collegiate ,athletics ,association 7,,ncaa71 and the ,national ,collegiate ,athletics ,association 7,,ncaa7 should work to prevent discrimination on the basis of sex in its programs and activities4 ,whereas title ,,ix of the ,education ,amendments of #aigb 7#bj ,u4,s4,c4 #afha et seq47 prohibits sex discrimination in all educational programs and activities that receive ,federal assistance1 including athletics programs2 ,whereas title ,,ix was intended to avoid the use of ,federal resources to support discriminatory practices and to provide individuals effective protection against such practices2 ,whereas title ,,ix does not1 on its face1 confine the list of those liable under the statute to recipients of ,federal funds1 but simply prohibits discrimination under any education program or activity receiving ,federal financial assistance2 ,whereas1 in the applicable implementing regulations for the ,department of ,education1 the ,department of ,education requires educational programs to offer students of all sexes equal opportunities to play sports1 to allocate athletic scholarships equitably1 and to treat athletes of all sexes equally with respect to other benefits and services4 7,benefits and services include equipment and supplies1 scheduling of games and practice times1 travel and daily allowance1 locker rooms1 practice and competitive facilities1 medical and training facilities and services1 housing and dining facilities and services1 publicity and promotions1 support services1 and recruitment of student athletes472 ,whereas the section #ijh of the ,education ,amendments of #aigb 7#bj ,u4,s4,c4 #afhg7 broadly defines a program or activity that receives ,federal funds to mean all of the operations of a list of entities1 including colleges and universities1 private organizations principally engaged in education1 and any other entity established by #b or more of the listed entities--or what ,congress termed the catch-all provision2 ,whereas1 in interpreting title ,,ix1 ,federal courts have correctly held that any entity that exercises controlling authority over a federally funded program is subject to title ,,ix1 regardless of whether that entity is itself a recipient of ,federal aid2 ,whereas ,federal courts have held that ,state athletic associations exercise controlling authority over interscholastic athletics programs and are therefore subject to title ,,ix 7,among other things1 ,state athletic associations set sports seasons1 sponsor ,state championship tournaments1 and set eligibility requirements for student participation in sports4 ,their membership is comprised primarily of educational institutions that receive ,federal funds and must comply with title ,,ix4 ,in order for ,state athletic associations to control and regulate athletics1 member institutions must cede their own ability to control many aspects of their athletics programs to the athletic association472 ,whereas ,federal courts have correctly reasoned that not subjecting athletic associations to title ,,ix would encourage ,federal recipients to empower someone else to promulgate discriminatory policies to avoid title ,,ix liability4 ,such an interpretation would allow ,federal funds to promote sex discrimination and would therefore run afoul of the plain language1 meaning1 and purpose of title ,,ix2 ,whereas1 like ,state athletic associations1 the ,,ncaa exercises controlling authority over its federally funded member institutions' athletics programs2 ,whereas the ,,ncaa is subject to title ,,ix because1 pursuant to section #ijh of such ,act1 it is an organization established by two or more colleges or universities that receive ,federal funds2 ,whereas the ,,ncaa is subject to title ,,ix because1 pursuant to section #ijh of such ,act1 it is an operation of its federally funded member schools2 ,whereas1 while the ,supreme ,court ruled in ,,ncaa v4 ,smith1 #ebe ,,us #dei 7#aiii71 that the ,,ncaa is not subject to title ,,ix by virtue of the dues it receives from its federally funded member schools1 the ,supreme ,court left open the question of whether the ,,ncaa is subject to title ,,ix on alternative grounds1 including based on its controlling authority over member schools' federally funded athletics programs or pursuant to the definition of program or activity in section #ijh of such ,act2 ,whereas the ,,ncaa is an unincorporated association of approximately #a1bjj members1 including virtually all public and private universities and #d-year colleges conducting major athletics programs in the ,united ,states4 ,members of the ,,ncaa that receive ,federal funds are subject to title ,,ix2 ,whereas member schools cede control to the ,,ncaa by allowing it to host #ij intercollegiate championship tournaments in #bd sports across #c divisions 7,during championship tournaments1 the ,,ncaa controls the medical1 training1 housing1 dining1 and competition facilities1 and dictates the tournament schedule and the publicity and promotion of the teams472 ,whereas1 because the ,,ncaa is subject to title ,,ix1 it must address documented discrimination against women's teams in the benefits and services provided during championship tournaments so that student athletes who experience sex discrimination during the regular season who are able to seek remedies under title ,,ix have the same remedies when they experience inequitable access to benefits or services during intercollegiate championship tournaments and other barriers to exercising their rights2 ,whereas1 despite being subject to title ,,ix1 the ,,ncaa provided inequitable benefits and services to women's basketball teams in its #bjba ,division ,i ,tournaments1 including inferior publicity1 promotions1 equipment1 supplies1 food1 facilities1 travel accommodations1 and health care protocols and resources2 ,whereas these disparities are contrary to the letter and spirit of title ,,ix1 undermine efforts to ensure gender equity in sports and society writ large1 and hold women and girls back from reaching their full potential2 and ,whereas the ,,ncaa leadership and ,board of ,governors of the ,,ncaa should publicly release all findings and recommendations of the comprehensive review of gender equity issues in ,,ncaa sports announced on ,march #be1 #bjba1 including actionable next steps to ensure transparency and meaningful change3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the sense of ,congress that the ,national ,collegiate ,athletics ,association 7,,ncaa7 is subject to title ,,ix of the ,education ,amendments of #aigb 7#bj ,u4,s4,c4 #afha et seq47 and should work to prevent discrimination on the basis of sex in its programs and activities4