,,iii #aafth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #gae ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,september #bd1 #bjbj,mr4 ,braun 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,tillis1 ,mrs4 ,hyde-,smith1 ,mr4 ,scott of ,florida1 ,mr4 ,moran1 ,mr4 ,lankford1 ,mr4 ,cassidy1 ,mr4 ,young1 ,mr4 ,rubio1 ,mr4 ,cramer1 ,mrs4 ,capito1 ,mrs4 ,blackburn1 ,mrs4 ,loeffler1 ,mr4 ,boozman1 ,mr4 ,risch1 ,mr4 ,scott of ,south ,carolina1 ,mr4 ,rounds1 ,mr4 ,grassley1 ,mr4 ,hoeven1 ,ms4 ,ernst1 ,mr4 ,perdue1 ,mr4 ,barrasso1 ,mr4 ,inhofe1 ,mrs4 ,fischer1 ,mr4 ,cornyn1 and ,mr4 ,cotton7 submitted the following resolution2 which was considered and agreed to ,,resolution ,expressing support for the ,pledge of ,allegiance4 ,whereas the ,united ,states was founded on principles of religious freedom by the ,founders1 many of whom were deeply religious2 ,whereas the ,first ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states embodies principles intended to guarantee freedom of religion both through the free exercise thereof and by prohibiting the ,government from establishing a religion2 ,whereas the ,pledge of ,allegiance was written by ,francis ,bellamy1 a ,baptist ,minister1 and first published in the ,september #h1 #ahib1 issue of the ,youth's ,companion2 ,whereas1 in #aied1 ,congress added the words under ,god to the ,pledge of ,allegiance2 ,whereas1 for over #fj years1 the ,pledge of ,allegiance has included references to the ,united ,states flag1 to the country having been established as a union under ,god1 and to the country being dedicated to securing liberty and justice for all2 ,whereas1 in #aied1 ,congress believed it was acting constitutionally when it revised the ,pledge of ,allegiance2 ,whereas the ,senate of the #aafth ,congress believes that the ,pledge of ,allegiance is a constitutional expression of patriotism2 ,whereas patriotic songs1 engravings on ,united ,states legal tender1 and engravings on ,federal buildings also contain general references to ,god2 ,whereas the ,supreme ,court overturned ,newdow v4 ,united ,states ,congress1 #cbh ,f4#c;d #dff 7#ith ,cir4 #bjjc71 a case in which the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,ninth ,circuit held that the recitation of the ,pledge of ,allegiance by a student's public school teacher violated the ,establishment ,clause of the ,first ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states2 and ,whereas the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,ninth ,circuit later concluded that its previous opinion in ,newdow was no longer binding precedent1 that case law from the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states concerning the ,establishment ,clause of the ,first ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states had subsequently changed1 and that ,congress1 when passing the new version of the ,pledge of ,allegiance1 established a secular purpose for the use of the terms under ,god and1 thus1 the ,united ,states ,court of ,appeals for the ,ninth ,circuit upheld the recitation of the ,pledge of ,allegiance by public school teachers3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that-- 7#a7 the ,pledge of ,allegiance has been a valuable part of life for the people of the ,united ,states for generations2 and 7#b7 the ,senate strongly defends the constitutionality of the ,pledge of ,allegiance4