,,iii #aafth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #eif ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,may #ba1 #bjbj,mr4 ,hawley 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,lee1 ,mr4 ,cotton1 ,mrs4 ,blackburn1 ,ms4 ,mc,sally1 ,mr4 ,peters1 ,mr4 ,wicker1 ,mrs4 ,loeffler1 ,mr4 ,sullivan1 ,mr4 ,rubio1 ,mr4 ,inhofe1 and ,mr4 ,daines7 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,foreign ,relations ,,resolution ,expressing the sense of the ,senate that the ,hong ,kong national security law proposed by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china would violate the obligations of that government under the #aihd ,sino-,british ,joint ,declaration and the ,hong ,kong ,basic ,law and calling upon all free nations of the world to stand with the people of ,hong ,kong4 ,whereas the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china has proposed a new national security law for ,hong ,kong that would ban secession1 subversion of state power1 and foreign interference1 as defined by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china2 ,whereas1 if the new national security law is passed1 the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china is expected to use this law to justify and facilitate an expanded crackdown against peaceful protests and other forms of nonviolent protest by the people of ,hong ,kong2 ,whereas this proposed law constitutes a significant escalation in the campaign by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china and its proxies in ,hong ,kong to erase the basic liberties and human rights promised to the people of ,hong ,kong under the #aihd ,sino-,british ,joint ,declaration and the ,hong ,kong ,basic ,law2 ,whereas the announcement by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china of its intent to pass this new national security law reflects that government's fundamental opposition not only to the basic rights and liberties of free persons championed by the people of ,hong ,kong and the ,united ,states1 but also to upholding its obligations under international law2 and ,whereas the efforts by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china to silence peaceful protestors in ,hong ,kong are part and parcel of a broader hegemonic vision that would see the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china impose its will upon all free people of ,asia and beyond3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that it is the sense of the ,senate that-- 7#a7 the ,hong ,kong national security law proposed by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china would violate the legal obligations of that government under-- 7,a7 the #aihd ,sino-,british ,joint ,declaration1 which guarantees for #ej years the protection of the basic rights and freedoms of the people of ,hong ,kong1 including those of speech1 press1 assembly1 association1 travel1 movement1 correspondence1 and strike2 and 7,b7 the ,hong ,kong ,basic ,law1 which reserves the authority for enacting laws prohibiting treason1 secession1 sedition1 subversion1 and foreign interference to the ,government of the ,hong ,kong ,special ,administrative ,region2 and 7#b7 the ,united ,states ,government should use all diplomatic means available1 including targeted sanctions1 to-- 7,a7 dissuade the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china from passing the proposed ,hong ,kong national security law2 7,b7 compel the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china to rescind the proposed ,hong ,kong national security law1 if it is passed2 and 7,c7 rally all free nations to stand with the people of ,hong ,kong against increasingly severe violations by the ,government of the ,people's ,republic of ,china of the rights and liberties guaranteed to them under the #aihd ,sino-,british ,joint ,declaration and the ,hong ,kong ,basic ,law4