,,iii #aafth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 ,,res4 #dbi ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,november #ah1 #bjai,mr4 ,schumer 7for ,ms4 ,harris 7for herself1 ,mr4 ,blumenthal1 ,mr4 ,booker1 ,mrs4 ,feinstein1 ,ms4 ,hirono1 ,mr4 ,wyden1 and ,ms4 ,warren77 submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,,resolution ,recognizing the importance of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff and the laws derived from the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff4 ,whereas1 in the aftermath of the ,civil ,war1 the reunified ,united ,states struggled to reconstruct the war-torn ,states and establish laws granting newly freed slaves the same rights afforded to ,white citizens2 ,whereas the reconstruction of the ,united ,states following the conclusion of the ,civil ,war necessarily included the integration of newly emancipated ,african ,americans into broader society and1 with that emancipation1 the receipt by those emancipated ,african ,americans of civil and legal protections2 ,whereas1 as a response to the uncertain and unequal status of newly freed slaves1 the #acth ,amendment to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states was ratified by the ,states on ,december #f1 #ahfe1 formally abolishing slavery within the ,united ,states1 or any place subject to their jurisdiction2 ,whereas1 on ,april #i1 #ahff1 ,congress overrode a ,presidential veto to enact the ,act of ,april #i1 #ahff 7commonly known as and referred to in this preamble as the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff7 7#ad ,stat4 #bg1 chapter #ca71 a law written to protect and clarify the newly bestowed rights of persons of ,african descent2 ,whereas the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff declared that all persons born in the ,united ,states are entitled to be citizens1 without regard to race1 color1 or previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude2 ,whereas the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff was enacted-- 7#a7 to establish that all persons born in the ,united ,states are to be considered citizens2 7#b7 to clearly define the rights guaranteed by ,united ,states citizenship2 and 7#c7 to make it unlawful for any person to deprive another person of those rights on the basis of race2 ,whereas the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff served the role of overriding ,black ,codes1 laws enacted in southern ,states to restrict the freedom of ,african ,americans and keep formerly enslaved persons from thriving in society2 ,whereas the first section of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff created an avenue for citizens who fell victim to intentional racial discrimination by allowing a citizen to go before a ,federal court and allege that the citizen was discriminated against while engaging in lawful activity2 ,whereas the first section of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff was used to challenge the laws established by southern ,states to limit the rights and opportunities of newly freed slaves2 ,whereas1 under section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha71 which is derived from section #af of the ,act of ,may #ca1 #ahgj 7commonly known as and referred to in this preamble as the ,enforcement ,act of #ahgj7 7#af ,stat4 #adj1 chapter #aad7 and the first section of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff1 ,african ,american citizens are given the right to enforce contracts1 give evidence in court1 sue and be sued1 and purchase1 sell1 and convey real and personal property2 ,whereas1 in #aige1 the ,supreme ,court recognized in ,johnson v4 ,railway ,express ,agency1 ,inc41 #dba ,u4,s4 #ded 7#aige71 that section #af of the ,enforcement ,act of #ahgj allowed for private employers to be held accountable for discrimination within their ranks2 ,whereas section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 applies to all contracts1 including those between employer and employee1 and has become a vital tool for employment discrimination claimants2 ,whereas section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 stands as one of the only laws protecting against employers openly discriminating on the basis of race when contracting with other parties2 ,whereas it is well established that section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 has been invoked to challenge race discrimination in employment matters and has held bad actors accountable for contract discrimination2 ,whereas1 in #aihi1 in ,patterson v4 ,mc,lean ,credit ,union1 #dia ,u4,s4 #afd 7#aihi71 the ,supreme ,court narrowly interpreted section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 to apply only to contract formation1 finding that only certain points in a contractual engagement could be subject to the protections afforded in that section2 ,whereas the ruling in ,patterson v4 ,mc,lean ,credit ,union1 #dia ,u4,s4 #afd 7#aihi71 functioned as a major setback to ensuring that all aspects of the interaction between an employee or individual with a business would be free of racial discrimination2 ,whereas1 in #aiia1 ,congress1 by statute1 as part of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #aiia 7,public ,law #ajb-aff2 #aje ,stat4 #ajga71 disagreed with a plethora of ,supreme ,court decisions that undermined ,federal antidiscrimination laws and challenged the restrictive interpretation of section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 expressed by the ,supreme ,court in ,patterson v4 ,mc,lean ,credit ,union1 #dia ,u4,s4 #afd 7#aihi72 ,whereas the #bjjh decision in ,,cbocs ,west1 ,inc4 v4 ,humphries1 #eec ,u4,s4 #ddb 7#bjjh71 further determined that section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 prohibits not only direct discrimination1 but retaliation against those alleging discrimination2 ,whereas the intent of ,congress is clear through the legislative history of section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha71 which definitively illustrates that the law was meant to provide and enforce robust protection against race discrimination in contracting2 ,whereas section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7-- 7#a7 in subsection 7a71 provides that all persons within the jurisdiction of the ,united ,states shall have the same right 4 4 4 to make and enforce contracts 4 4 4 as is enjoyed by white citizens2 and 7#b7 in subsection 7b71 defines make and enforce contracts to include the making1 performance1 modification1 and termination of contracts1 and the enjoyment of all benefits1 privileges1 terms1 and conditions of the contractual relationship2 ,whereas section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 clearly enumerates the protections afforded to minorities in the ,united ,states when contracting with businesses and makes clear that all aspects of the creation1 modification1 and termination of contracts are subject to the scrutiny of that section2 ,whereas the most direct interpretation of section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 ensures that all racial minorities in the ,united ,states be granted the opportunity to enter into contractual agreements free of discrimination2 and ,whereas section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 serves as a critically important tool to ensure that no person is denied the ability to contract with another on the basis of race3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that the ,senate-- 7#a7 recognizes and honors the historical significance of section #aigg of the ,revised ,statutes 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #aiha7 and the instrumental contributions of that law to the pursuit of equal protection for all citizens of the ,united ,states2 7#b7 reaffirms its commitment to the #acth1 #adth1 and #aeth ,amendments to the ,constitution of the ,united ,states1 to the ,act of ,april #i1 #ahff 7commonly known as and referred to in this resolving clause as the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff7 7#ad ,stat4 #bg1 chapter #ca7 7and the laws derived from that ,act71 and to the civil rights and liberties of all racial minorities across the ,united ,states2 and 7#c7 reaffirms the congressional intent behind the first section of the ,civil ,rights ,act of #ahff 7and the laws derived from that ,act71 which was1 and remains1 the protection of the rights of minorities seeking refuge from racial discrimination in business4