,,iii  #aaf? ,,congress  #a/ ,session   
,s4 ,,res4 #cgh  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!
 ,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,octob] #bd1 #bjai,mr4
 ,graham 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,mc,connell1  
,mr4 ,grassley1 ,mr4 ,?une1 ,mr4 ,blunt1
 ,mr4 ,inh(e1 ,mr4 ,crapo1 ,mr4 ,cornyn1
 ,mr4 ,burr1 ,mr4 ,b>rasso1 ,mr4 ,wick]1
 ,mr4 ,ris*1 ,mr4 ,boozman1 ,mr4 ,paul1 
,mr4 ,lee1 ,mr4 ,johnson1 ,mr4 ,scott ( 
,s\? ,c>ol9a1 ,mrs4 ,fis*]1 ,mr4 ,cruz1 
,mrs4 ,capito1 ,mr4 ,cassidy1 ,mr4      
,lank=d1 ,mr4 ,cotton1 ,mr4 ,da9es1 ,mr4
 ,p]due1 ,ms4 ,ern/1 ,mr4 ,tillis1 ,mr4 
,r\nds1 ,mr4 ,"y1 ,mr4 ,k5n$y1 ,mrs4    
,hyde-,smi?1 ,mrs4 ,blackburn1 ,mr4     
,cram]1 ,mr4 ,%elby1 ,mr4 ,rob]ts1 ,mr4 
,moran1 ,mr4 ,hoev51 ,mr4 ,rubio1 ,mr4  
,braun1 ,mr4 ,hawley1 ,mr4 ,scott (     
,florida1 ,mr4 ,sasse1 ,mr4 ,toomey1    
,ms4 ,mc,sally1 & ,mr4 ,sullivan7       
submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0     
ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,rules &      
,adm9i/ration  ,,resolution  ,express+ !
 s5se ( ! ,s5ate t ! ,h\se (            
,repres5tatives %\ld1 consi/5t )        

long-/&+ practice & prec$5t1 prior to   
proce$+ any fur!r ) its impea*m5t       
inve/igation into ,presid5t ,donald ,j4 
,trump1 vote to op5 a =mal impea*m5t    
inquiry & provide ,presid5t ,trump )    
fundam5tal con/itutional protections4   
,:]eas "o ( ! corn]/ones ( ! ,am]ican   
,con/itution is due process3 ! "r to    
confront y\r accus]1 call witnesses on  
y\r behalf1 & *all5ge ! accusations     
aga9/ y2 ,:]eas ! ,h\se (               
,repres5tatives is ab&on+ m ?an a       
c5tury's wor? ( prec$5t & tradition 9   
impea*m5t proce$+s & d5y+ ,presid5t     
,trump basic fairness & due process     
accord$ e ,am]ican2 ,:]eas1 9 our       
nation's hi/ory1 ! ,h\se has on ?ree    
occasions mov$ to =mally inve/igate :e!r
 suffici5t gr\nds exi/ to impea* a      
,presid5t1 & 9 all ?ree ( ^! cases1 !   
full ,h\se vot$ on a resolution au?oriz+
 ! ,h\se ,judici>y ,committee to det]m9e
 :e!r to impea* ! ,presid5t2 ,:]eas1 9 !
 case ( ,presid5t ,trump1 a =mal        
impea*m5t process involv+ debate & a    

vote by ! full ,h\se prior to tak+ ea*  
/ep 9 ! process has be5 replac$ by a    
press conf]5ce by ! ,speak] ( ! ,h\se2  
,:]eas ! proposition t ! ,speak] act+   
alone may direct committees to initiate 
impea*m5t proce$+s )\t any debate or a  
vote on ! ,h\se floor is unprec$5t$ &   
undemocratic2 ,:]eas ! ,h\se is d5y+    
,presid5t ,trump due process )9 !       
inquiry itself2 ,:]eas1 = ! impea*m5t   
inve/igations ( ,presid5t ,ri*>d ,m4    
,nixon & ,presid5t ,william ,j4 ,cl9ton1
 ! ,h\se ,judici>y ,committee adopt$    
rules ( proc$ure to provide due process 
rights & ensure fairness2 ,:]eas ^!     
rights includ$-- 7#a7 all[+ ! ,presid5t 
to be repres5t$ by c\nsel2  7#b7 p]mitt+
 ! ,presid5t's c\nsel to be pres5t at   
all he>+s & depositions2  7#c7 p]mitt+ !
 ,presid5t's c\nsel to pres5t evid5ce & 
object to ! admission ( evid5ce2  7#d7  
all[+ ! ,presid5t's c\nsel to call &    
cross-exam9e witnesses2 &  7#e7 giv+ !  
,presid5t's c\nsel access to1 & !       
ability to respond to1 ! evid5ce adduc$ 

by ! ,committee2  ,:]eas1 by contra/1 ! 
,h\se's curr5t impea*m5t inquiry        
provides none ( ^! basic rights &       
protections to ,presid5t ,trump2 ,:]eas 
! ma9 allegations aga9/ ,presid5t ,trump
 are bas$ on ass]tions & te/imony f     
witnesses :om he is unable to confront1 
z "p ( a process 9 :i* he is n able to  
(f] witnesses 9 8 def5se or h a basic   
und]/&+ ( ! allegations lodg$ aga9/ him2
 ,:]eas all witness int]views t h be5   
conduct$ ?us f> 9 ! ,h\se h be5 beh9d   
clos$ doors ) limit$ m9ority            
p>ticipation2 ,:]eas ! ,h\se's curr5t   
impea*m5t inquiry ignores ! proc$ural   
rights giv5 to ! inve/igat+ committee's 
m9ority 9 previ\s ,presid5tial          
impea*m5ts1 includ+ grant+ equal subpo5a
 p[] to bo? ! *air & rank+ memb] ( !    
committee2 ,:]eas1 ! ,h\se is d5y+      
,presid5t ,trump ! same basic           
pre-inquiry rights af=d$ to ,presid5t   
,cl9ton2 ,:]eas ! ,:itewat]             
,inve/igation involv$ ne>ly five ye>s ( 
pa9/ak+ inve/igative "w by a special    

c\nsel & an indep5d5t c\nsel be=e !     
,h\se ev5 vot$ to h ! ,judici>y         
,committee op5 an impea*m5t inquiry2    
,:]eas ,presid5t ,cl9ton vigor\sly f\ght
 t inve/igation1 includ+ by rais+       
multiple privilege claims & he 0 p]mitt$
 to fully litigate ^? claims ?r\gh !    
c\rts2 ,:]eas ,presid5t ,trump1 by      
contra/1 fully coop]at$ ) ,special      
,c\nsel ,rob]t ,s4 ,muell]'s            
inve/igation2 ,:]eas1 dur+ ! c\rse ( !  
,muell] inve/igation1 ,presid5t ,trump  
nev] rais$ privilege claims1 he turn$   
ov] m ?an "o million pages ( docum5ts1  
he direct$ s5ior aides to te/ify freely1
 includ+ mak+ ! ,:ite ,h\se ,c\nsel     
available to te/ify = m ?an ?irty h\rs1 
& he agre$ to answ] writt5 que/ions on  
p5alty ( p]jury2 & ,:]eas1 r ?an giv+   
,presid5t ,trump ! same due process     
rights t ,presid5t ,cl9ton _h to raise &
 litigate claims ( con/itutional        
privilege1 ,h\se ,intellig5ce ,committee
 ,*airman ,adam ,s*iff has repeat$ly    
?reat5$ to use ,presid5t ,trump's       

ass]tion ( 8 con/itutional rights z     
evid5ce ( ob/ruction & to impea*        
,presid5t ,trump = try+ to litigate ^?  
claims3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x  ,t ! ,s5ate-- 
7#a7 calls on ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives1
 prior to proce$+ any fur!r ) its       
impea*m5t inve/igation into ,presid5t   
,trump1 to vote to initiate a =mal      
impea*m5t inquiry2  7#b7 calls on !     
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives to provide      
,presid5t ,trump1 l e o!r ,am]ican1 )   
due process1 to include ! ability to    
confront 8 accus]s1 call witnesses on 8 
behalf1 & h a basic und]/&+ ( !         
accusations aga9/ him t w\ld =m any     
basis = impea*m5t2 &  7#c7 calls on !   
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives to provide      
memb]s ( ! m9ority ) ! ability to       
p>ticipate fully 9 all proce$+s & h     
equal au?ority to issue subpo5as & o!r  
compulsory process4