,,iii  #aaf? ,,congress  #a/ ,session   
,s4 ,,res4 #agb  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!
 ,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,april #bi1 #bjai ,mr4
 ,mc,connell 7= himself & ,mr4 ,s*um]7  
submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0     
consid]$ & agre$ to  ,,resolution  ,to  
au?orize te/imony 9 an adm9i/rative he>+
 = ,bryan ,k4 ,/anley be=e !            
,mississippi ,division ( ,m$icaid4      
,:]eas1 9 ! adm9i/rative appeal ( ,bryan
 ,k4 ,/anley1 ,dkt4 ,no4 ,,mc-#ah-afj1  
p5d+ be=e ! ,mississippi ,division (    
,m$icaid1 ! b5efici>y has reque/$       
te/imony f ,kim ,coalt]1 an employee ( !
 (fice ( ,s5ator ,c9dy ,hyde-,smi?2     
,:]eas1 by ! privileges ( ! ,s5ate ( !  
,unit$ ,/ates & ,rule ,,xi ( ! ,/&+     
,rules ( ! ,s5ate1 no evid5ce "u !      
control or 9 ! possession ( ! ,s5ate    
may1 by ! judicial or adm9i/rative      
process1 be tak5 f su* control or       
possession b by p]mission ( ! ,s5ate2 & 
,:]eas1 :5 x appe>s t evid5ce "u !      
control or 9 ! possession ( ! ,s5ate may
 promote ! adm9i/ration ( ju/ice1 !     

,s5ate w take su* action z w promote !  
ends ( ju/ice consi/5t ) ! privileges ( 
! ,s5ate3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x  ,t ,kim     
,coalt] is au?oriz$ to te/ify 9 !       
adm9i/rative he>+ ( ,bryan ,k4 ,/anley  
be=e ! ,mississippi ,division (         
,m$icaid1 except conc]n+ matt]s = :i* a 
privilege %\ld be ass]t$4