,,ii #aafth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 #fjc ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,february #bh1 #bjai,mr4 ,rounds 7for himself1 ,mr4 ,jones1 ,mr4 ,tillis1 and ,ms4 ,sinema7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,committee on ,banking1 ,housing1 and ,urban ,affairs ,a ,,bill ,to amend the ,financial ,stability ,act of #bjaj to require the ,financial ,stability ,oversight ,council to consider alternative approaches before determining that a ,u4,s4 nonbank financial company shall be supervised by the ,board of ,governors of the ,federal ,reserve ,system1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,financial ,stability ,oversight ,council ,improvement ,act of #bjai4 #b4 ,financial ,stability ,oversight ,council ,section #aac of the ,financial ,stability ,act of #bjaj 7#ab ,u4,s4,c4 #ecbc7 is amended-- 7#a7 in subsection 7a7-- 7,a7 in paragraph 7#a71 by striking ,the ,council and inserting ,subject to paragraph 7#c71 the ,council2 and 7,b7 by adding at the end the following3 7#c7 ,initial determination ,the ,council may not vote on a proposed determination with respect to a ,u4,s4 nonbank financial company under paragraph 7#a7 unless the ,council first determines1 in consultation with the company and the primary financial regulatory agency with respect to the company1 that a different action by the ,council or the agency 7including the application of new or heightened standards and safeguards under section #abj71 or by the company under a written plan that is submitted promptly to the ,council1 is impracticable or insufficient to mitigate the threat that the company could pose to the financial stability of the ,united ,states4 2 and 7#b7 in subsection 7f77#a71 by striking subsection 7e7 and inserting subsections 7a77#c7 and 7e74