,,ii #aafth ,,congress #ast ,session ,s4 #cadb ,,in ,,the ,,senate ,,of ,,the ,,united ,,states ,december #ai1 #bjai,ms4 ,hassan 7for herself and ,mr4 ,johnson7 introduced the following bill2 which was read twice and referred to the ,select ,committee on ,intelligence ,a ,,bill ,to establish the ,interagency ,united ,states-,based ,terrorism ,threat ,information ,sharing ,commission1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,increasing ,efficiency of ,all ,united ,states-,based ,terrorism ,information ,sharing ,act of #bjai4 #b4 ,findings ,congress makes the following findings3 7#a7 ,eighteen years after ,september #aa1 #bjja1 the ,federal ,government needs to reevaluate its counterterrorism information sharing architecture in the ,united ,states to support the ability of ,federal1 ,state1 and local law enforcement to identify1 track1 and prevent all terrorist threats in the ,united ,states4 7#b7 ,the current ,national ,strategy for ,counterterrorism states that incidents of domestic terrorism in the ,united ,states are on the rise1 perpetrated by individuals not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations but instead by other forms of terrorism in the ,united ,states 7sometimes as referred to as domestic terrorists by the executive branch71 and individuals inspired by foreign terrorist organizations remain a persistent threat4 7#c7 ,furthermore1 the terrorist threat in the ,united ,states is increasingly diffuse and unpredictable1 primarily conducted by lone actors who are motivated or inspired by a range of violent ideologies4 ,lone actors are able to operate with little to no warning and present significant challenges to law enforcement and security officials working to identify and disrupt potential threats4 ,robust and comprehensive information sharing regarding all terrorist threats in the ,united ,states1 irrespective of inspiration1 is key to our ability to prevent attacks and save lives4 7#d7 ,lastly1 increasing distribution and standardization of ,federal terrorism training that reflects all types of ,united ,states-based terrorism threats is critical to support ,federal1 ,state1 and local law enforcement's ability to keep all of our communities safe4 #c4 ,definitions ,in this ,act3 7#a7 ,appropriate committees of ,congress ,the term appropriate committees of ,congress includes the following3 7,a7 ,the ,committee on the ,judiciary1 the ,committee on ,homeland ,security and ,governmental ,affairs1 and the ,select ,committee on ,intelligence of the ,senate4 7,b7 ,the ,committee on the ,judiciary1 the ,committee on ,homeland ,security1 and the ,permanent ,select ,committee on ,intelligence of the ,house of ,representatives4 7#b7 ,commission ,the term ,commission means the ,interagency ,united ,states-,based ,terrorism ,information ,sharing ,commission established under section #d7;a77#a74 7#c7 ,domestic terrorism ,the term domestic terrorism has the meaning given such term in section #bcca of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code4 7#d7 ,field office ,the term field office means one of the field offices of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation 7also known as divisions7 that are centrally located in major metropolitan areas across the ,united ,states1 including ,puerto ,rico1 where the ,bureau-- 7,a7 carries out investigations2 7,b7 assesses local and regional crime threats2 and 7,c7 works closely with partners on cases and operations4 7#e7 ,foreign terrorist organization ,the term foreign terrorist organization means an organization designated as a terrorist organization under section #bai7;a7 of the ,immigration and ,nationality ,act 7#h ,u4,s4,c4 #aahi7;a774 7#f7 ,fusion center ,the term fusion center has the meaning given such term in section #baj;,a7j7 of the ,homeland ,security ,act of #bjjb 7#f ,u4,s4,c4 #abd;h7j774 7#g7 ,joint terrorism task force ,the term joint terrorism task force means one of the task forces of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation that are-- 7,a7 located throughout ,united ,states2 7,b7 partnerships between various ,federal1 ,state1 and local law enforcement and intelligence agencies2 and 7,c7 charged with taking action against terrorism4 #d4 ,establishment of ,interagency ,united ,states-,based ,terrorism ,threat ,information ,sharing ,commission 7a7 ,establishment 7#a7 ,in general ,not later than #de days after the date of the enactment of this ,act1 the ,director of ,national ,intelligence shall1 in coordination with the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation1 and the ,attorney ,general1 establish a commission to review interagency information sharing with respect to all forms of terrorist threats in the ,united ,states to examine the terrorist threat information sharing landscape across and between all levels of government and the manner in which different types of terrorism affects information sharing4 7#b7 ,designation ,the commission established under paragraph 7#a7 shall be known as the ,interagency ,united ,states-,based ,terrorism ,threat ,information ,sharing ,commission4 7b7 ,membership 7#a7 ,composition ,subject to paragraph 7#b71 the ,commission shall be composed of not more than #bh members as follows3 7,a7 ,the ,director of ,national ,intelligence shall appoint to the ,commission not more than #g members as follows3 7i7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,office of the ,program ,manager for the ,information ,sharing ,environment4 7ii7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,directorate of ,strategic ,operational ,planning in the ,national ,counterterrorism ,center4 7iii7 ,acting through the head of the ,joint ,counterterrorism ,assessment ,team in the ,national ,counterterrorism ,center1 at least #a member shall be selected from among members of a ,state or local law enforcement agency4 7,b7 ,the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security shall appoint to the ,commission not more than #g members as follows3 7i7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,office of ,strategy1 ,policy1 and ,plans of the ,department of ,homeland ,security4 7ii7 ,at least #c members shall be selected from a fusion center-- 7,i7 at least #a of whom shall be based out of a recognized regional fusion center2 7,,ii7 at least #a of whom shall be based out of a designated ,state fusion center in a ,state that the ,secretary considers small or rural2 and 7,,iii7 at least #a of whom shall be based out of a designated ,state fusion center in a ,state that has #b or more recognized fusion centers4 7,c7 ,the ,attorney ,general shall appoint to the ,commission not more than #g members as follows3 7i7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,national ,security ,division of the ,department of ,justice4 7ii7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,civil ,rights ,division of the ,department of ,justice4 7iii7 ,at least #b members shall be selected from among employees of an office of a ,united ,states ,attorney-- 7,i7 at least #a of whom shall be based out of a ,state that the ,attorney ,general considers large or urban2 and 7,,ii7 at least #a of whom shall be based out of a ,state that the ,attorney ,general considers small or rural4 7,d7 ,the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation shall appoint not more than #g members as follows3 7i7 ,at least #a of whom shall be selected from among employees of the ,domestic ,terrorism ,operations ,section of the ,bureau4 7ii7 ,at least #a member shall be selected from among employees of the ,criminal ,investigative ,division of the ,bureau4 7iii7 ,at least #b members shall be selected from among members of a joint terrorism task force-- 7,i7 at least #a of whom shall be a member of a local law enforcement agency in a city of the ,united ,states the ,director considers large or urban2 and 7,,ii7 at least #a of whom shall be a member of a local law enforcement agency in a city of the ,united ,states the ,director considers small or rural4 7#b7 ,additional requirements 7,a7 ,no political appointees ,no member of the ,commission may be a political appointee4 7,b7 ,employment status ,each member of the ,commission shall be-- 7i7 an employee of the ,federal ,government in the executive branch2 7ii7 an individual who has been detailed to the executive branch of the ,federal ,government2 or 7iii7 an individual who is a member of a ,state or local law enforcement agency4 7c7 ,commission chairperson 7#a7 ,in general ,the ,director of ,national ,intelligence shall select a chairperson from among members of the ,commission who are senior officers of the ,national ,counterterrorism ,center4 7#b7 ,duties of the chairperson ,the chairperson appointed under paragraph 7#a7 shall-- 7,a7 lead the interagency process to prepare the report required by section #e7;b77#a72 7,b7 arbitrate difference among those involved in preparing the report required by section #e7;b77#a72 and 7,c7 ensure that each ,federal agency represented in the membership of the ,commission-- 7i7 has equal opportunity for input in matters concerning the ,commission2 and 7ii7 will lead efforts under section #e that pertain to matters with respect to which the agency has a statutory mandate4 #e4 ,duties of the ,commission 7a7 ,review 7#a7 ,in general ,the ,commission shall conduct a review of threat information sharing described in section #d7;a77#a74 7#b7 ,elements ,the review required by paragraph 7#a7 shall include the following3 7,a7 ,the assessment described in subparagraph 7,a7 of subsection 7b77#b74 7,b7 ,development of the findings described in subparagraphs 7,b7 and 7,c7 of such subsection4 7,c7 ,development of the recommendations described in subparagraph 7,d7 of such subsection4 7b7 ,report 7#a7 ,in general ,the ,commission shall submit to the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,attorney ,general1 and the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation a report on the findings of the ,commission with respect to the review conducted under subsection 7a77#a74 7#b7 ,contents ,the report submitted under paragraph 7#a7 shall include the following3 7,a7 ,assessment ,an assessment of current capabilities1 mechanisms1 gaps1 and challenges regarding nationwide ,united ,states-based terrorism threat-information sharing and training4 7,b7 ,information sharing findings ,findings on information sharing1 including with respect to the following3 7i7 ,baseline existing types of terrorism threat information 7,i7 ,what type of information regarding ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 is currently captured across the ,federal1 ,state1 and local levels of government1 along with information about such terrorism that is likely not captured or is lost at each level4 7,,ii7 ,types of information under subclause 7,i7 may include cables1 situational reports1 information reports1 assessments1 digests1 toolboxes1 and bulletins4 7,,iii7 ,with respect to information described in subclause 7,i7-- 7aa7 a comparison and noted differences between both types of information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and inspired by foreign terrorist organizations2 and 7bb7 any gaps and challenges to addressing such differences4 7,,iv7 ,the types of information captured at each level described in subclause 7,i7 while possibly labeled as other criminal acts that could be relevant to threats of terrorism not inspired by ,united ,states-based foreign terrorist organizations1 including relevant intelligence1 reporting1 and assessments4 7,v7 ,the effect of how different levels of classified information affect the types of threat information captured4 7ii7 ,partners who receive the information 7,i7 ,who receives information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 and separately who receives information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 as well as those entities and partners who do not currently receive this information1 including with respect to ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal government partners4 7,,ii7 ,with respect to threat information described in subclause 7,i7-- 7aa7 a comparison and noted differences between both information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and inspired by foreign terrorist organizations2 and 7bb7 any gaps and challenges to addressing such differences4 7,,iii7 ,the effect of how different levels of classified information affect the receipt of such information by various partners4 7iii7 ,what information is shared 7,i7 ,what information regarding ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 is currently shared or could be shared with the partners identified under clause 7ii71 as well as information the ,commission identifies is not being shared4 7,,ii7 ,with respect to threat information described in subclause 7,i7-- 7aa7 a comparison and noted differences between both information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and inspired by foreign terrorist organizations2 and 7bb7 any gaps and challenges to addressing such differences4 7,,iii7 7aa7 ,an assessment of how information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations according to the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation's broad program categories of racially motivated violent extremism1 animal and eco violent extremism1 antigovernment violent extremism1 and abortion violent extremism4 7bb7 ,assessment under item 7aa7 shall be disaggregated by the following3 7,,aa7 ,types of racially motivated violent extremism1 specifically outlining all threat information relating to both white and black violent extremism1 and the numerical volume of threat information under each subcategory or subprogram4 7,,bb7 ,types of antigovernment violent extremism to clearly illustrate all threat information relating to militia1 anarchist1 and sovereign citizen violent extremism and the numerical volume of threat information under each subcategory or subprogram4 7,,cc7 ,types of animal and eco violent extremism and the numerical volume of threat information under each subcategory or subprogram4 7,,iv7 ,expansion of the categorization described in subclause 7,,iii7 to include creation of a new category for new and emerging threats1 such as anti-immigrant violent extremism1 and incel violent extremism4 7,v7 ,effects of how sharing at different levels of classified information affects what information is available to various partners4 7iv7 ,how threat information is shared 7,i7 ,how information regarding ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 is shared1 including what the existing mechanisms are for sharing with respect to infrastructure or personnel1 disaggregated by-- 7aa7 what types of threat information are received2 7bb7 classification level2 and 7cc7 partner identified under clause 7ii74 7,,ii7 ,with respect to information described in subclause 7,i7-- 7aa7 a comparison and noted differences between both information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and inspired by foreign terrorist organizations2 and 7bb7 any gaps and challenges to address such differences4 7,,iii7 ,existing mechanisms through which information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 is currently shared within and across the ,federal ,government with partners identified under clause 7ii71 including with respect to the following3 7aa7 ,infrastructure1 such as ,guardian1 e,guardian1 and the ,national ,crime ,information ,center4 7bb7 ,task forces1 such as joint terrorism task forces4 7cc7 ,professional staff who perform information sharing as part as an official duty1 such as liaison officers4 7dd7 ,threat information sharing from ,federal to ,state and local partners1 from local partners to ,state and ,federal partners1 and information that is shared laterally between ,states and between ,federal agencies4 7ee7 ,threat information sharing across geographic and interagency lines1 departments and agencies1 and information systems4 7,,iv7 ,effects of how sharing at different levels of classified information affects how threat information is shared with various partners4 7v7 ,redundancies1 gaps1 and differences 7,i7 ,redundancies1 gaps1 and differences in information sharing regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof4 7,,ii7 ,causes of such redundancies1 gaps1 and differences described in subclause 7,i74 7,,iii7 ,challenges to improvement with respect to sharing described in subclause 7,i74 7,,iv7 ,how redundancies and gaps described in subclause 7,i7 differ between ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 disaggregated by each category of partner identified under clause 7ii74 7,v7 ,how differences described in subclause 7,,iv7 relate to challenges concerning classification of threat information4 7,c7 ,united ,states-based terrorism training findings ,findings relating to existing ,federal training concerning either or a combination of both ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 or ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 including the following3 7i7 7,i7 ,what ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal government training exists regarding both ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 disaggregated by categories and classification differences4 7,,ii7 ,with respect to information described in subclause 7,i7-- 7aa7 a comparison and noted differences between both information regarding threats of ,united ,states-based terrorism not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations and inspired by foreign terrorist organizations2 and 7bb7 any gaps and challenges to address such differences4 7ii7 ,which partners identified under subparagraph 7,b77ii7 receive what training with respect to terrorism in the ,united ,states4 7iii7 ,what are the mechanisms1 institutions1 and training centers that provide each of such trainings4 7iv7 ,an examination of training content1 who provides such training1 how providers of such training are vetted1 how such training is vetted or coordinated among agencies1 disaggregated by training concerning ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof4 7v7 ,outlines of training redundancies1 gaps1 and challenges in distribution1 for each type of training1 and the impediments to addressing such challenges4 7,d7 ,recommendations 7i7 ,threat information sharing ,recommendations to address the differences between information sharing concerning ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 including recommendations regarding policy1 programs1 resources1 and infrastructure needed to address challenges and gaps indicated in the findings of the ,commission4 ,such recommendations shall include the following3 7,i7 ,information recipients ,recommendations to maintain1 commence1 or expand coordination and threat information sharing among ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal government agencies and private entities with protective or public safety responsibilities who were identified as needing access to such information1 including how gaps should be mitigated and how current challenges should be addressed4 7,,ii7 ,content ,recommendations to maintain1 commence1 or expand the type and categories of threat information given to each of the ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal government agencies and private entities described in subclause 7,i74 7,,iii7 ,mechanisms ,recommendations relating to the most effective use of existing ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal mechanisms for capturing and sharing relevant threat information1 including-- 7aa7 how gaps should be mitigated2 7bb7 how current challenges should be addressed2 and 7cc7 proposals for new or expanded mechanisms4 7,,iv7 ,eliminating redundancy ,recommendations to eliminate redundancy regarding who receives threat information1 what information is shared1 mechanisms for how information is shared1 including recommendations to address the implications for redundancy if new measures are enacted4 7,v7 ,filling gaps ,recommendations to address overarching gaps to threat information sharing4 7ii7 ,training program ,recommendations concerning training1 including the following3 7,i7 ,recommendations for creating a ,federal interagency terrorism training program to train officers and employees of government departments and agencies and relevant private entities in matters relating to threats1 trends1 and tailored opportunities for prevention concerning both ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof4 7,,ii7 ,recommendations concerning additional training on investigation of crimes concerning ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 under current ,state and ,federal legal structures and related crimes such as hate crimes4 7,,iii7 ,recommendations concerning additional training on-- 7aa7 infrastructure and mechanisms that allow law enforcement to report ,united ,states-based terrorism threats that are not inspired by foreign terrorist organizations1 or the ideology thereof1 and hate crimes2 and 7bb7 information sharing and dissemination4 7#c7 ,consideration of various needs ,in developing the report required by paragraph 7#a71 the ,commission shall take into account the different needs of ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal law enforcement agencies across the ,united ,states4 7#d7 ,review of drafts ,before submitting a report under paragraph 7#a71 the chairperson of the ,commission shall ensure that a draft of the report is made available to the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,attorney ,general1 and the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation for review and to obtain feedback from the various legal1 civil rights1 and privacy offices under their respective jurisdictions4 7#e7 ,annexes ,the report under paragraph 7#a7 shall include a separate annex for each of the following that highlights respective efforts to include nationwide ,federal1 ,state1 and local input1 where relevant1 in preparation of the report3 7,a7 ,the ,office of the ,director of ,national ,intelligence4 7,b7 ,the ,department of ,homeland ,security4 7,c7 ,the ,department of ,justice4 7,d7 ,the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation4 7#f7 ,presentation ,information and comparisons in the report submitted under paragraph 7a7 shall be presented in the report in both narrative and visual graph form to clearly depict any differences4 #f4 ,reporting to ,congress 7a7 ,report on assessment1 findings1 and recommendations ,not later than #ahj days after the date of the establishment of the ,commission1 the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 in coordination with the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,attorney ,general1 and the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation1 shall submit to the appropriate committees of ,congress a final report on the assessments1 findings1 and recommendations of the ,commission that were submitted to the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,attorney ,general1 and the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation under section #e7;b74 7b7 ,annual report on implementation of recommendations 7#a7 ,in general ,not later than #a year after the date on which the final report is submitted under subsection 7a7 and not less frequently than once each year thereafter for #aj years1 the ,director of ,national ,intelligence shall1 in coordination with the ,secretary of ,homeland ,security1 the ,attorney ,general1 and the ,director of the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation1 submit to the appropriate committees of ,congress a report on any action taken to implement the recommendations of the ,commission4 7#b7 ,contents ,each report submitted under paragraph 7#a7 shall include the following3 7,a7 ,information relating to the number of recommendations implemented and the status of the implementation4 7,b7 ,an assessment of future trends1 challenges1 and opportunities1 including new technologies1 that will affect ,federal1 ,state1 local1 and ,tribal government department and agency efforts to continue to improve information sharing regarding all forms of terrorism4 #g4 ,commission administrative matters 7a7 ,rules and procedures ,the ,commission shall operate via established interagency terms and procedures for researching and drafting interagency reports relating to terrorism and information sharing4 7b7 ,participation of ,government employees ,an employee of the ,office of the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,department of ,homeland ,security1 the ,department of ,justice1 or the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation may be required to participate in the ,commission on a part-time or full-time basis4 7c7 ,receiving comprehensive input 7#a7 ,in general ,the ,commission shall-- 7,a7 solicit input by including local partners in the ,commission1 as required by section #d7;b77#a72 7,b7 solicit nationwide input through the ,office of the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,department of ,homeland ,security1 the ,department of ,justice1 and the ,federal ,bureau of ,investigation2 7,c7 solicit input by conducting local field interviews where the ,commission considers doing so appropriate and cost productive2 and 7,d7 solicit input from independent interagency advisory boards1 including the ,senior ,advisory ,group of the ,office of the ,director of ,national ,intelligence1 the ,homeland ,security ,advisory ,board1 the ,executive ,advisory ,board1 the ,homeland ,security and ,law ,enforcement ,partners ,board1 and the ,privacy and ,civil ,liberties ,oversight ,board4 7#b7 ,targets of solicitation ,those from whom input is solicited under paragraph 7#a7 shall include3 7,a7 ,fusion centers4 7,b7 ,field offices4 7,c7 ,local offices of ,united ,states ,attorneys1 including-- 7i7 offices in cities the ,commission considers large or urban2 and 7ii7 offices in cities the ,commission considers small or rural4 7,d7 ,local representatives from the ,federal agencies represented in the membership of the ,commission4 7,e7 ,local police departments4 7,f7 ,offices of sheriffs4 7,g7 ,offices of probation and pretrial services4 7,h7 ,the various academies and training offices of each of these ,federal agencies represented in the membership of the ,commission4 7,i7 ,state law enforcement agencies and ,state investigative agencies4 7,j7 ,privacy offices of each of the ,federal agencies represented in the membership of the ,commission4 7,k7 ,civil rights and civil liberties offices of each of the ,federal agencies represented in the membership of the ,commission4 7,l7 ,relevant screening1 vetting1 and watchlisting offices of each of the ,federal agencies represented in the membership of the ,commission4 7,m7 ,relevant offices within the ,bureau of ,prisons of the ,department of ,justice4 #h4 ,termination of ,commission ,the ,commission shall terminate #cj days after the date on which the final report is submitted under section #f7;a74