,,ii  #aaf? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,s4 #bgjc  ,,9 ,,! ,,s5ate ,,( ,,!      
,,unit$ ,,/ates  ,octob] #bd1 #bjai,ms4 
,cantwell 7= h]self & ,ms4 ,duckwor?7   
introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 read     
twice & ref]r$ to ! ,committee on       
,comm]ce1 ,sci5ce1 & ,transportation  ,a
 ,,bill  ,to enhance ! recognition (1 & 
response to1 aircraft failure           
conditions1 & = o!r purposes4  #a4 ,%ort
 title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z !        
,aviation ,automation & ,human ,factors 
,safety ,act ( #bjai4  #b4 ,enhanc+     
pilot recognition (1 & response to1     
failure conditions  7a7 ,9 g5]al ,z     
recomm5d$ by ! ,national ,transportation
 ,safety ,bo>d 9 ,aviation ,safety      
,recomm5dation ,report ,,asr-#ai-ja     
issu$ on ,septemb] #ai1 #bjai1 & titl$  
,assumptions ,us$ 9 ! ,safety ,assessm5t
 ,process & ! ,effects ( ,multiple      
,al]ts & ,indications on ,pilot         
,p]=mance1 ! ,adm9i/rator ( ! ,f$]al    
,aviation ,adm9i/ration 79 ?is ,act     
ref]r$ to z ! ,adm9i/rator71 %all d !   

foll[+3  7#a7 #gcg ,,max ,require1 )    
respect to #gcg ,,max aircraft1 !       
manufactur] ( su* aircraft to demon/rate
 to ! satisfaction ( ! ,adm9i/rator t-- 
7,a7 sy/em safety assessm5ts = su*      
aircraft1 includ+ ^? 9 :i* imm$iate &   
appropriate pilot corrective actions are
 assum$ 9 response to uncomm&$ flight   
control inputs f sy/ems su* z !         
,maneuv]+ ,*>act]i/ics ,augm5tation     
,sy/em1 consid] ! effect ( all possible 
flight deck al]ts & indications on pilot
 recognition & response2 &  7,b7 design 
enhancem5ts 7includ+ flight deck al]ts &
 indications71 pilot proc$ures1 & tra9+ 
requirem5ts1 are incorporat$ into su*   
aircraft :]e ne$$1 to m9imize ! pot5tial
 =1 & safety impact (1 pilot actions t  
are inconsi/5t ) manufactur]            
assumptions4  7#b7 ,o!r aircraft        
,require t manufactur]s ( all ,unit$    
,/ates type-c]tificat$                  
transport-category aircraft 7o!r ?an    
#gcg ,,max aircraft7 demon/rate to !    
satisfaction ( ! ,adm9i/rator t--  7,a7 

sy/em safety assessm5ts = su* aircraft1 
includ+ ^? 9 :i* imm$iate & appropriate 
pilot corrective actions are assum$ 9   
response to uncomm&$ flight control     
inputs consid] ! effect ( all possible  
flight deck al]ts & indications on pilot
 recognition & response2 &  7,b7 design 
enhancem5ts 7includ+ flight deck al]ts &
 indications71 pilot proc$ures1 & tra9+ 
requirem5ts1 are incorporat$ into su*   
aircraft :]e ne$$1 to m9imize ! pot5tial
 =1 & safety impact (1 pilot actions t  
are inconsi/5t ) manufactur]            
assumptions4  7#c7 ,int]national        
regulators ,notify int]national         
regulators t c]tify transport-category  
aircraft type designs 7su* z ! ,european
 ,union ,aviation ,safety ,ag5cy1       
,transport ,canada1 ! ,national ,civil  
,aviation ,ag5cy-,brazil1 ! ,civil      
,aviation ,adm9i/ration ( ,*9a1 & !     
,russian ,f$]al ,air ,transport ,ag5cy7 
( ! requirem5ts "u subp>agraphs 7,a7 &  
7,b7 ( p>agraph 7#b7 & enc\rage su*     
regulators to evaluate ! relevance ( su*

 requirem5ts to _! processes & address  
any *anges1 if applicable4  7#d7        
,developm5t ( tools & me?ods = validat+ 
assumptions  7,a7 ,developm5t ,develop  
robu/ tools & me?ods1 ) ! input (       
indu/ry & human factors exp]ts1 = use 9 
validat+ assumptions ab\t pilot         
recognition & response to               
safety-significant failure conditions z 
"p ( ! aircraft design c]tification     
process4  7,b7 ,revision ( regulations &
 guidance ,aft] ! tools & me?ods h be5  
develop$ z recomm5d$ "u subp>agraph     
7,a71 revise exi/+ ,f$]al ,aviation     
,adm9i/ration regulations & guidance to 
incorporate ! use ( su* tools & me?ods &
 require docum5tation z "p ( ! aircraft 
design c]tification process1 includ+    
re-exam9+ ! validity ( pilot recognition
 & response assumptions p]mitt$ 9 exi/+ 
,f$]al ,aviation ,adm9i/ration guidance4
  7#e7 ,developm5t & implem5tation (    
diagno/ic tools  7,a7 ,developm5t       
,develop design /&>ds1 ) ! input (      
indu/ry & human factors exp]ts1 =       

aircraft sy/em diagno/ic tools t improve
 ! prioritization & cl>ity ( failure    
indications 7direct & indirect7 pres5t$ 
to pilots to improve ! timel9ess &      
effectiv5ess ( _! response4  7,b7       
,implem5tation ,aft] ! design /&>ds h   
be5 develop$ "u subp>agraph 7,a71       
require implem5tation ( sy/em diagno/ic 
tools on transport-category aircraft to 
improve ! timel9ess & effectiv5ess (    
pilots' response :5 multiple flight deck
 al]ts & indications are pres5t4  7b7   
,annual report on progress ,n lat] ?an  
#a ye> aft] ! date ( ! enactm5t ( ?is   
,act1 & annually !reaft]1 ! ,adm9i/rator
 %all submit to ,congress a report on ! 
progress ( ! ,adm9i/rator 9 c>ry+ out ! 
requirem5ts "u subsection 7a74 ,su*     
report %all also include recomm5dations 
= su* legislation & adm9i/rative action 
z ! ,adm9i/rator det]m9es appropriate4  
#c4 ,enhanc+ ! ability ( ! ,,faa to     
ensure t air c>ri]s suffici5tly address 
pilot monitor+ & manual fly+ skills ,z  
recomm5d$ by ! ,inspector ,g5]al ( !    

,dep>tm5t ( ,transportation 9 audit     
report ,,av-#bjaf-jac issu$ on ,janu>y  
#g1 #bjaf1 & titl$ ,enhanc$ ,,faa       
,ov]sight ,c\ld ,r$uce ,haz>ds          
,associat$ ,) ,increas$ ,use ( ,flight  
,deck ,automation1 ! ,adm9i/rator1 9    
ord] to enhance ! ability ( ! ,f$]al    
,aviation ,adm9i/ration to ensure t air 
c>ri]s suffici5tly address pilot        
monitor+ & manual fly+ skills1 %all1 n  
lat] ?an #a ye> aft] ! date ( enactm5t (
 ?is ,act--  7#a7 issue guidance def9+  
pilot monitor+ metrics t air c>ri]s may 
use to tra9 & evaluate pilots1 includ+  
metrics or measurable tasks t air c>ri]s
 c use to evaluate pilot monitor+       
pr(ici5cy2 &  7#b7 e/abli% & dissem9ate 
/&>ds to det]m9e :e!r pilots receive    
suffici5t tra9+ opportunities to        
develop1 ma9ta91 & demon/rate manual    
fly+ skills necess>y to ensure pilots c 
recov] f an unexpect$ ev5t or failures )
 highly automat$ cockpit sy/ems4  #d4   
,requirem5t t design & production       
organizations h 9 place a safety        

managem5t sy/em  7a7 ,rulemak+ ,!       
,adm9i/rator %all conduct a rulemak+    
proce$+ to require t design & production
 approval hold]s = aviation products h 9
 place a safety managem5t sy/em 7,,sms7 
t is consi/5t ) ! /&>ds e/abli%$ by !   
,int]national ,civil ,aviation          
,organization = su* sy/ems4  7b7 ,f9al  
rule ,n lat] ?an #a ye> aft] ! date (   
enactm5t ( ?is ,act1 ! ,adm9i/rator %all
 issue a f9al rule pursuant to !        
rulemak+ conduct$ "u subsection 7a74    
7c7 ,surveillance & audit requirem5t ,"u
 ! f9al rule issu$ pursuant to          
subsection 7b71 ! ,adm9i/rator %all     
implem5t docum5t$ surveillance processes
 by def9+ & plann+ inspections1 audits1 
& monitor+ activities on a cont9u\s     
basis1 to ensure t design & production  
approval hold]s = aviation products     
cont9ue to meet ! e/abli%$ requirem5ts  
"u ! rule4  #e4 ,,faa ,c5t] = ,excell5ce
 = flight automation & human factors 9  
comm]cial aircraft  7a7 ,c5t]  7#a7 ,9  
g5]al ,! ,adm9i/rator %all develop a    

,c5t] = ,excell5ce focus$ on flight     
automation & human factors 9 comm]cial  
aircraft4  7#b7 ,duties ,! ,c5t] =      
,excell5ce %all-- 7,a7 promote &        
facilitate collaboration among academia1
 ! ,f$]al ,aviation ,adm9i/ration1 & !  
comm]cial aircraft & airl9e indu/ries1  
includ+ aircraft manufactur]s1 comm]cial
 air c>ri]s1 & repres5tatives ( ! airl9e
 pilot community2 &  7,b7 e/abli% goals 
= rese>* & cont9u+ education 9 areas (  
/udy relevant to advanc+ te*nology1     
improv+ eng9e]+ practices1 & facilitat+ 
bett] und]/&+ ( human factors concepts 9
 ! context ( ! gr[+ developm5t &        
reliance on automation 9 comm]cial      
aircraft4  7b7 ,au?orization (          
appropriations ,!re is au?oriz$ to be   
appropriat$ to ! ,adm9i/rator su* sums z
 may be necess>y to c>ry out ?is        
section4