,,iv #aaf? ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #hif ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,m>* #aa1 #bjbj,mr4 ,res*5?al] submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,=eign ,affairs ,,resolution ,reaffirm+ support ( fundam5tal ,unit$ ,/ates pr9ciples at ! ,unit$ ,nations & enc\rag+ ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization to embrace te*nological advancem5ts 9 tobacco control4 ,:]eas ! ,unit$ ,nations 0 e/abli%$ 9 "p z a global =um to conv5e disp>ate p>ties1 resolve disputes1 & e/abli% policy recomm5dations 9 a fair1 equitable1 & transp>5t mann]2 ,:]eas ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization1 an affiliat$ organization ( ! ,unit$ ,nations1 develops policy recomm5dations t sev]ely re/rict1 or de facto prohibit1 int]action ) legal private ent]prise & !reby provides no rec\rse or opportunity = input to ^? impact$ entities2 ,:]eas1 9 #bjaf1 ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization adopt$ ! ,framework ( ,engagem5t ) ,non-,/ate ,actors1 commonly kn[n z ,,f5sa1 :i*1 by design1 effectively disc\rages int]action ) ! private sector2 ,:]eas ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization is actively t>get+ major ,am]ican indu/ries1 includ+ agriculture1 food & bev]age1 & ph>macology1 ) on]\s global regulations1 & ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization's policies t>get+ ! tobacco sector outright prohibit communication1 engagem5t1 or opportunity = p>tn]%ip2 ,:]eas ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization is actively pressur+ ! entire ,unit$ ,nations sy/em1 includ+ ! ,unit$ ,nations ,secret>y-,g5]al1 ,int]national ,labor ,organization1 ,food & ,agriculture ,organization1 ,economic & ,social ,c\ncil1 ,_w ,bank1 & ,int]national ,monet>y ,fund1 among o!rs1 to adopt simil> policies ) respect to ! tobacco sector2 ,:]eas ! ,p's ,republic ( ,*9a owns ,*9a ,national ,tobacco ,corporation1 ! l>ge/ tobacco company 9 ! _w1 & ?is does n disqualify ! ,p's ,republic ( ,*9a f engag+ 9 dialogue ) & receiv+ funds f ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization2 ,:]eas ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization's tobacco policy recomm5dations fail to ackn[l$ge t available sci5ce1 te*nology1 & innovation c accel]ate ! decl9e ( cig>ette smok+ worldwide & r$uce smok+-relat$ dea? & disease2 ,:]eas al?\gh ! be/ heal? outcome = curr5t smok]s is to quit nicot9e altoge!r1 ! reality is t less ?an #aj p]c5t ( adult smok]s w successfully quit cig>ettes 9 a giv5 ye>2 ,:]eas ! ,food & ,drug ,adm9i/ration's tobacco control policy recognizes ?is reality & provides global heal? regulators a pa?way =w>d to move adult smok]s d[n ! cont9uum ( risk2 ,:]eas pursuant to ! bip>tisan ,family ,smok+ ,prev5tion & ,tobacco ,control ,act1 ! ,food & ,drug ,adm9i/ration 7,,fda7 foll[s an inclusive1 transp>5t regulatory framework t promotes innovation 9 tobacco products bas$ on a rigor\s sci5tific evaluation1 includ+ m9imiz+ un9t5d$ use ( su* products by nonsmok]s1 =m] smok]s1 & y\?1 :]e only ^? products det]m9$ to be appropriate = ! protection ( public heal? receive ,,fda au?orization2 ,:]eas ! ,,fda regul>ly engages ! private sector 9 an op5 & transp>5t mann] reg>d+ ! developm5t ( su* innovative products2 ,:]eas ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization cont9ues to cite an irreconcilable & inh]5t conflict to prohibit any engagem5t ) or input f ! tobacco sector & does n ackn[l$ge ! ,food & ,drug ,adm9i/ration's review & regulation ( sci5ce1 te*nology1 & innovation t c pot5tially r$uce ! h>ms associat$ ) cig>ette smok+2 & ,:]eas policies bas$ on ! exclusion ( any indu/ry = :i* !y seek to regulate d n advance s\nd heal? policy1 & are anti!tical to fundam5tal ,unit$ ,/ates values ( equal protection1 free spee*1 due process1 & ! "r to petition3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives directs ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,/ate & ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,heal? & ,human ,s]vices to enc\rage ! ,unit$ ,nations & ! ,_w ,heal? ,organization1 respectively1 to adopt policies t recognize ! rights ( disp>ate p>ties & sci5tific det]m9ations ( ! ,food & ,drug ,adm9i/ration to advance te*nology & innovation t c r$uce ! burd5 ( dea? & disease caus$ f cig>ette smok+4