,,iv #aafth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,,res4 #hhf ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,march #e1 #bjbj,mr4 ,biggs submitted the following resolution2 which was referred to the ,committee on the ,judiciary ,,resolution ,condemning ,charles ,chuck ,schumer1 ,senator of ,new ,york4 ,whereas ,senator ,schumer participated in a rally outside of the ,supreme ,court of the ,united ,states on ,march #d1 #bjbj1 at which he directed a threat at ,justice ,gorsuch and ,justice ,kavanaugh2 ,whereas ,senator ,schumer specifically stated1 ,i want to tell you1 ,gorsuch4 ,i want to tell you1 ,kavanaugh4 ,you have released the whirlwind1 and you will pay the price4 ,you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions42 ,whereas elected officials1 including ,majority ,whip ,steve ,scalise and ,congresswoman ,gabrielle ,giffords1 have already been victims of physical violence rooted in political disagreement2 ,whereas ,chief ,justice ,john ,roberts issued a statement shortly after these comments took place1 saying1 ,justices know that criticism comes with the territory1 but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate1 they are dangerous42 ,whereas ,senator ,schumer's comments to not contribute anything positive to the public dialogue2 ,whereas ,senator ,schumer is the leader of his conference in the ,senate and is held to a higher standard for his colleagues and the ,american people to follow2 ,whereas ,senator ,schumer's comments are in direct conflict with the constitutional process by which cases are deliberated and verdicts are issued by the ,supreme ,court2 and ,whereas ,senator ,schumer is setting the foundation for public and political unrest should the case be decided contrary to his party's preference3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that-- 7#a7 the ,house of ,representatives condemns ,senator ,charles ,chuck ,schumer for rhetoric that threatens two ,supreme ,court justices and incites public discord1 and is not befitting an elected ,member of the ,congress2 and 7#b7 it is the sense of the ,house of ,representatives that ,charles ,chuck ,schumer1 ,senator of ,new ,york1 should-- 7,a7 issue a formal apology to ,justice ,kavanaugh and ,justice ,gorsuch for making threats and sowing seeds of discord2 and 7,b7 issue a public statement that threats towards members of any of the three branches of the ,federal ,government are not an appropriate reaction for anyone--especially those in elected office--to express disagreement with any duly elected or appointed member of the executive1 legislative1 or judicial branch4