,,iv  #aaf? ,,congress  #b;d ,session   
,h4 ,,res4 #ghi  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,janu>y #aj1 #bjbj,mr4
 ,k+ ( ,i[a submitt$ ! foll[+           
resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee
 on ,h\se ,adm9i/ration  ,,resolution   
,rais+ a "q ( ! privileges ( ! ,h\se4   
,:]eas 9 a quote attribut$ to him by !  
,new ,york ,times1 ,congressman ,k+ is  
alleg$ to h wond]$ :5 ! phrases ,:ite   
nationali/1 :ite supremaci/1 ,we/]n     
,civilization became (f5sive1 sugge/+ to
 "s t he does n view ! fir/ two t]ms z  
pejorative2 ,:]eas ,congressman ,k+ has 
consi/5tly disput$ ?is int]pretation1   
ma9ta9+ t he 0 simply try+ to ask :5 !  
phrase ,we/]n ,civilization _h ga9$ a   
pejorative connotation1 an ass]tion t is
 support$ by ! rema9+ section ( ! ,times
 quote2 ,:]eas ,congressman ,k+ says !  
conv]sation 9 :i* ?is quote is alleg$ to
 happ5 0 ab\t ! left's use ( weaponiz$  
language3 we discuss$ ! *ang+ use (     
language 9 political disc\rse4 ,we      
discuss$ ! worn out label raci/ & my    

obs]vation t o!r sl&]\s labels h be5    
increas+ly assign$ to ,cons]vatives by !
 ,left1 :o inject$ into our curr5t      
political dialog su* t]ms z ,nazi1      
,fasci/1 ,:ite ,nationali/1 ,:ite       
,supremaci/1--,we/]n ,civilization1 h[  
did ,,t language become (f5sive8 ,:y did
 ,i sit 9 classes tea*+ me ab\t ! m]its 
( our hi/ory & our civilization8 ''' j  
to wat* ,we/]n ,civilization become a   
d]ogatory t]m 9 political disc\rse      
today42 ,:]eas notably1 none ( ! context
 ( ! discussion :i* spawn$ ! quote 0    
includ$ 9 ! ,new ,york ,times /ory4 ,?is
 context w\ld h add$ great] cl>ity to   
,k+'s report$ rem>ks1 reveal+ t 8       
int5tion 0 to "q ! inclusion ( ,,we/]n  
,,civilization alone z a pejorative2    
,:]eas no tape ( ! int]view ) ! ,new    
,york ,times exi/s & ! pap] refuses to  
release ! report]'s notes ( !           
conv]sation2 ,:]eas ! "q t ,congressman 
,k+ is purport$ to h be5 respond+ to has
 n be5 disclos$ & nei!r ! ,new ,york    
,times nor ! report] has answ]$ :e!r !  

"q pos$ includ$ ! two odi\s ideologies t
 7 !n alleg$ 9 ! response1 logically    
lead+ ! ,congressman to repeat back !   
ideologies z !y _h be5 fir/ pos$ by !   
report]2 ,:]eas ! /ructure ( ! purport$ 
quote contextually only makes s5se if ! 
report] did 9 fact ref] to ^? odi\s     
ideologies 9 ! "q pos$1 9 s do+ lead+   
,congressman ,k+ to repeat !m back z he 
pond]$ ! "q t 0 ask$ ( him2 ,:]eas !    
cont5t ( ! ,times quote makes x cle> t  
,k+ 0 ,,only talk+ ab\t ,we/]n          
,civilization4 ,! quote3 ,:ite          
,nationali/1 :ite ,supremaci/1 ,we/]n   
civilization--h[ did ,,t language become
 (f5sive8 ,:y did ,i sit 9 classes tea*+
 me ab\t ! m]its ( our hi/ory & our     
civilization82 ,:]eas ,,nobody ,,9      
,,am]ica ,,ev] ,,sat ,,9 ,a ,,class ab\t
 ! m]its ( ,:ite nationalism or ,:ite   
supremacism4 ,! incorrect int]pretation 
t has be5 giv5 to ?is quote refutes     
itself bas$ on ! quot$ s5t5ce's own     
con/ruction2 ,:]eas1 on ,janu>y #ah?1   
#bjai1 ,m>k ,/eyn 0 quot$ z say+ ,he    

made a mi/ake1 ,/eve ,k+4 ,he agre$ to  
give an int]view on national immigration
 policy to ! ,new ,york ,times4 ,t's n a
 good fai? int]view reque/4 ,!y're only 
ask+ y1 & he %\ld "k ?is1 !y're only    
ask+ y to /it* y up4 ,to talk to y =    
?ree h\rs & get y to use "o phrase 9 !re
 t !y c lift out & kill y ) ''' ,?is    
guy1 ,/eve ,k+1 0 trapp$1 trapp$6 ,!    
words he said ab\t :5 did t become      
controv]sial1 he meant ! phrase ,we/]n  
,civilization4 ,he's n a :ite           
supremaci/4 ,he's n a :ite nationali/4  
,x's all /upid talk4 ,s y've j surr5d]$ 
! phrase ,we/]n ,civilization4 ,i don't 
get t4 ,i don't see :at's 9 x =         
cons]vatism 9 surr5d]+ t phrase1 9      
accept+ ! lefti/'s view t ! t]m ,we/]n  
,civilization is beyond ! pale42 ,:]eas 
contemporane\s evid5ce supports ,k+'s   
v]sion ( ! /ory3 ,9 a ,*ri/ian ,sci5ce  
,monitor 7,,csm7 article publi%$ on     
,janu>y #ae1 #bjai 7#e days aft] !      
,times /ory broke71 ,k+ is quot$ mak+ a 
simil> argum5t3 ,9 a conv]sation ) !    

,monitor j be=e ! holidays1 ,k+ def5d$  
himself aga9/ accusations ( racism4 ,!  
left1 he says1 has weaponiz$ t]ms l     
raci/1 ,nazi & :ite nationali/ us+ !m   
aga9/ anyone :o d>es to def5d ,am]ican  
values or ! ,con/itution4 ,!re are p t  
don't l ,am]ica ! way x is1 he says1 &  
!re are p t don't l ,am]ica :5 %e 0 at  
h] be/4 ,!y want to te> d[n ! sy/ems we 
h4 ,i don't believe t4 ,i ?9k our ,f\nd+
 ,fa!rs got x "r442 ,:]eas ?is ,,csm    
int]view occurr$ prior to ! release ( ! 
,times article1 & %[s h[ ,k+ _h be5 mak+
 a v>iation ( ?is argum5t at !          
approximate "t he spoke to ! ,times     
report]4 ,9 ?is case1 ?\gh1 ! ,,csm     
actually publi%$ x 9 ! context 9 :i* x 0
 made4 ,x is cle> t ,k+ 0 mak+ a simil> 
argum5t to ! ,times2 ,:]eas ! quote 9 ! 
,,csm is ! ,,fir/ ,,docum5t$ ,,in/ance (
 ,/eve ,k+ ev] us+ ! phrase :ite        
nationali/4 ,?is is an important po9t1  
because ,k+ has ass]t$ ,t ideology nev] 
%[s up 9 my head4 ,i don't "k h[ x c\ld 
possibly come out ( my m\?44 ,a         

,lexis-,nexis se>* dat+ back to #bjjj   
%[s ,k+ has nev] us$ any ( ! foll[+     
phrases3 :ite nationalism1 :ite         
nationali/1 :ite supremaci/1 or :ite    
supremacy4 ,9 ! same "t frame1 ,k+ is   
quot$ #bgf times us+ ! t]m ,we/]n       
,civilization2 ,:]eas bas$ on ?is data1 
x appe>s unlikely t ,k+ spontane\sly us$
 ! phrases :ite nationali/ & :ite       
supremaci/ 9 8 discussion ) ! ,times    
report]1 z !y 7 nev] common elem5ts ( 8 
spee*4 ,x sugge/s t ,k+ 0 repeat+ t]ms  
f$ to him by ! ,times2 ,:]eas !         
cont5tion t ,k+ react$ to ! ,times      
report]'s use ( ! phrases :ite          
nationali/1 :ite supremaci/1 & we/]n    
civilization z pejoratives is support$  
by ! body ( ! ,times article itself2    
,:]eas ! article conta9s ! foll[+       
passage1 likely writt5 prior to ! ,k+   
int]view3 ,elect$ to ,congress 9 #bjjb1 
,mr4 ,k+ attract$ ! att5tion ( hate-wat*
 gr\ps l ! ,anti-,defamation ,league z  
he spoke increas+ly ab\t pres]v+ ,we/]n 
,culture or ,we/]n ,civilization4 ,!    

gr\ps consid] ^? buzzwords t signal     
support to :ite nationali/s1 along ) an 
obsession ) bir?rates & abortion rates  
among diff]5t e?nic gr\ps4 ,doesn't x   
make m s5se t ! report] ask$ a "q 9 :i* 
,we/]n ,civilization 0 l9k$ ) ! (f5sive 
epi!ts1 & ,k+ respond$ by wond]+ h[ x   
came to be t ! m]itori\s phrase ,we/]n  
,civilization became a simil>           
pejorative8 ,c]ta9ly1 ! answ] he is     
alleg$ to h giv5 fits ) ?is belief2     
,:]eas ! po9t ,k+ 0 attempt+ to make    
ab\t ! left's use ( labels to sme>      
cons]vatives1 labels :i* n[ include ev5 
! concept ( ,we/]n ,civilization itself1
 is support$ by ,lexis-,nexis data4     
,beg9n+ 9 #bjaf !re has be5 an explosive
 increase 9 ! use ( ! labels ,:ite      
,supremaci/1 ,:ite ,supremacy1 ,:ite    
,nationali/1 & ,:ite ,nationalism4 ,?is 
squ>es closely ) :at ,congressman ,k+   
told ,dave ,price ( ,,:o-,,tv reg>d+ !  
phrase ,:ite ,nationali/3 ,x is a       
d]ogatory t]m today4 ,i w\ldn't h ?\ght 
s maybe a ye> or two or ?ree ago4 ,today

 !y use x z a d]ogatory t]m1 & x implies
 t y are a raci/42 ,:]eas 9 8 /atem5t1  
,k+ 0 try+ to put into words 8 entirely 
accurate obs]vation t ! t]m :ite        
nationali/ has be5 weaponiz$ by ! left  
aga9/ cons]vatives1 & t its use 9 ?is =m
 has m>k$ly increas$ ov] ! pa/ sev]al   
ye>s2 ,:]eas ,k+'s po9t ab\t ! increas$ 
frequ5cy ) :i* ! weaponiz$ t]m :ite     
nationali/ has be5 inject$ into mod]n   
political dialogue is evid5t :5 data f a
 ,lexis-,nexis ,news ,database se>* is  
analyz$ & we le>n t ,:ite nationali/ 0  
virtually an unus$ t]m prior to #bjaf1 &
 quickly surg$ to #ca1jeg usages 9 ! ye>
 #bjag2 ,:]eas z ,k+ told ,price1 x has 
only be5 9 ! la/ ye> or two or ?ree t ! 
pejorative phrase :ite nationali/ has   
ga9$ pur*ase 9 ! political debate z a   
weaponiz$ t]m2 ,:]eas a foll[ up ,new   
,york ,times /ory ab\t ,/eve ,k+ entitl$
 ,a ,timel9e ( ,/eve ,k+'s ,raci/       
,rem>ks & ,divisive ,actions 0 criticiz$
 by leg5d>y j\rnali/ ,brit ,hume z be+  
completely bogus4 ,?is completely bogus 

/ory 0 writt5 ! next day by ! same      
writ]1 9 ! same pap]1 on ! same g5]al   
topic1 & c\ld possibly be reveal+ ( a   
bias reg>d+ ,congressman ,k+2 ,:]eas !  
,congressional ,record made ! exact same
 error z ! ,new ,york ,times 9          
transcrib+ ,k+'s ,janu>y #ae1 #bjai1    
floor /atem5t1 :5 ! transcriptioni/ left
 out a break betwe5 ! words :ite        
supremaci/ & we/]n civilization4 ,video 
%[s ,k+ int5tionally ins]t+ a break     
betwe5 ^? words1 b ! transcript does n  
reflect ?is2 ,:]eas no "o believes !    
,congressional ,record 0 act+ ) animus4 
,b _! error did reveal h[ ei!r a simil> 
error1 or an int5tional misplacem5t (   
punctuation1 c\ld h l$ to a bot*$ quote 
9 ! ,times4 ,rememb]1 ,k+ has always    
disput$ ! quote z x 0 portray$ 9 !      
,times2 ,:]eas ,k+ is insi/+ ^u a       
correction 9 ! ,congressional ,record s 
t x reflects ! quote z he int5tionally  
deliv]$ x on ! ,h\se floor4 ,k+'s       
correction reveals t he 0 attempt+ to   
sep>ate ,we/]n ,civilization f ! o!r two

 pejorative t]ms2 ,:]eas ?is is ! ,new  
,york ,times_/,congressional ,record's  
mi/ak5 quote3 ,:ite ,nationali/1 ,:ite  
,supremaci/1 ,we/]n ,civilization--h[   
did ,,t language become (f5sive8 ,:y did
 ,i sit 9 classes tea*+ me ab\t ! m]its 
( our hi/ory & our civilization82 ,:]eas
 ?is is ! correct$ quote3 ,:ite         
,nationali/1 ,:ite ,supremaci/1--,we/]n 
,civilization1 h[ did ,,t language      
become (f5sive8 ,:y did ,i sit 9 classes
 tea*+ me ab\t ! m]its ( our hi/ory &   
our civilization82 ,:]eas "o misplac$   
hyph5 9 ! ,new ,york ,times /ory gave   
bir? to a m]itless controv]sy1 by       
falsely imply+ t ,congressman ,k+ did n 
diff]5tiate betwe5 ! ?ree phrases2      
,:]eas ,congressman ,k+ 0 railroad$ ov] 
a false quote4 ,to believe ! v]sion (   
ev5ts reli$ ^u by ,kev9 ,mc,carthy to   
/rip ,k+ ( committee assignm5ts1 "o mu/ 
believe t an unreasonable b s5sational  
int]pretation1 = :i* no evid5ce exi/s1  
is m likely to be accurate ?an a        
reasonable1 noncontrov]sial             

int]pretation :i* is int]nally support$ 
by context clues & ext]nally support$ by
 data & o!r contemporane\s1 publi%$     
acc\nts4 ,"o mu/ also believe t ! ,new  
,york ,times1 a ho/ile1 lib]al pap] :i* 
has _h o!r articles ab\t ,congressman   
,/eve ,k+ writt5 by ! same au?or        
?or\ghly debunk$ z completely bogus1 set
 aside its animus 9 ?is p>ticul> case2  
,:]eas clause #a ( rule ,,ix def9es     
que/ions ( privileges ( ! ,h\se z ^?    
affect+ ! rights ( ! ,h\se collectively1
 its safety1 dignity1 & ! integrity (   
its proce$+s44 ,subjects giv+ rise to   
que/ions ( ! privileges ( ! ,h\se       
include ! integrity ( ! ,j\rnal1 !      
protection ( ,h\se records & files1 & ! 
accuracy ( ,h\se docum5ts & records2 &  
,:]eas ! mi/ak5 quote1 z also mi/ak5ly  
record$ 9 ! ,congressional ,record1     
reflects directly on bo? ! ,h\se's      
dignity & integrity3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x   
,t ! ,cl]k ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives  
%all correct ! ,congressional ,record f 
,janu>y #ae1 #bjai1 onl9e & 9 pr9t1 to  

reflect :at 0 orig9ally /at$ & !n       
reit]at$ on ! ,h\se floor3 ,:ite        
,nationali/1 ,:ite ,supremaci/1--,we/]n 
,civilization1 h[ did ,,t language      
become (f5sive8 ,:y did ,i sit 9 classes
 tea*+ me ab\t ! m]its ( our hi/ory &   
our civilization84