,,iv  #aafth ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #ghd  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of
 ,,representatives  ,january #i1        
#bjbj,mr4 ,byrne 7for himself1 ,mr4     
,duncan1 ,mr4 ,bishop of ,north         
,carolina1 ,mr4 ,fulcher1 ,mr4 ,weber of
 ,texas1 ,mr4 ,smith of ,missouri1 and  
,mr4 ,mooney of ,west ,virginia7        
submitted the following resolution2     
which was referred to the ,committee on 
,ethics  ,,resolution  ,condemning and  
censuring ,nancy ,d',alessandro ,pelosi1
 ,representative of ,california's #abth 
,congressional ,district4  ,whereas the 
power of impeachment is divided under   
article ,i1 section #b1 clause #e and   
article ,i1 section #c1 clause #f of the
 ,constitution into two parts with the  
,house having the sole ,power of        
,impeachment and the ,senate having the 
sole ,power to try impeachments2        
,whereas on ,december #ah1 #bjai1 the   
,house of ,representatives agreed to two
 articles of impeachment against ,donald
 ,john ,trump1 ,president of the ,united

 ,states1 for high crimes and           
misdemeanors2 ,whereas historical       
precedent of the ,house indicates that  
following adoption of such articles1 the
 ,house should forthwith name managers  
to prosecute the ,house's case before   
the ,senate and notify the ,senate of   
such appointments2 ,whereas failure to  
name managers and inform the ,senate of 
their appointment impedes the ,senate   
from proceeding with its constitutional 
duty to try an impeachment under its    
rules2 ,whereas the sole role of the    
,house in an impeachment trial of the   
,senate is to present evidence in the   
manner prescribed by the rules of the   
,senate2 ,whereas ,representative ,nancy
 ,d',alessandro ,pelosi in her capacity 
as ,speaker of the ,house is preventing 
the ,house from naming managers in an   
attempt to extort concessions from the  
,senate on the conduct of the           
impeachment trial against ,president    
,donald ,john ,trump2 ,whereas this     
attempt by ,representative ,nancy       

,d',alessandro ,pelosi to establish a   
quid pro quo where the ,house performs a
 necessary function in the impeachment  
process in exchange for the ,senate     
agreeing to demands with respect to the 
impeachment trial is an impermissible   
attempt to invade the ,constitutionally 
delegated authority of the ,senate2     
,whereas leveraging the powers of the   
,house in this matter by indefinitely   
preventing the trial of ,donald ,john   
,trump or by attempting to slant the    
trial in a manner favorable to the      
proponents of impeachment and removal   
threatens to deny ,donald ,john ,trump  
his constitutionally protected right of 
due process and the opportunity to      
defend himself2 and ,whereas the actions
 of ,representative ,nancy              
,d',alessandro ,pelosi represent an     
abuse of power and bring dishonor and   
discredit to the ,house of              
,representatives3 ,now1 therefore1 be it
  ,that-- 7#a7 the ,house of            
,representatives censures and condemns  

,representative ,nancy ,d',alessandro   
,pelosi for abuse of power with respect 
to the impeachment of ,donald ,john     
,trump1 ,president of the ,united       
,states2  7#b7 ,representative ,nancy   
,d',alessandro ,pelosi will forthwith   
present herself in the well of the      
,house for the pronouncement of censure2
 and  7#c7 ,representative ,nancy       
,d',alessandro ,pelosi will be censured 
with the public reading of this         
resolution by the ,speaker4