,h4 ,,res4 #eec  ,in the ,house of      
,representatives1 ,u4 ,s41  ,september  
#ab1 #bjai  ,,resolution  ,whereas on   
,september #bf1 #bjag1 ,roger ,j4 ,stone
 ,jr4 appeared in ,washington1 ,,dc1 and
 was interviewed by the ,permanent      
,select ,committee on ,intelligence of  
the ,house of ,representatives in       
connection with that ,committee's       
investigation into ,russian interference
 in the #bjaf ,united ,states election2 
,whereas the ,department of ,justice    
requested in a ,december #ad1 #bjah1    
letter to the ,permanent ,select        
,committee on ,intelligence that the    
,committee provide a transcript of its  
,september #bf1 #bjag1 interview with   
,mr4 ,stone1 as well as any other       
written submissions or correspondence   
from ,mr4 ,stone or his attorneys before
 and after his interview2 ,whereas on   
,december #bj1 #bjah1 pursuant to a     
bipartisan ,committee vote on that date 
authorizing the release of ,executive   
,session materials1 the then-,chair and 

ranking minority member of the          
,permanent ,select ,committee on        
,intelligence jointly sent the          
,department of ,justice the transcript  
of ,mr4 ,stone's ,september #bf1 #bjag1 
interview1 as well as an enumerated list
 of related materials2 ,whereas on      
,january #bd1 #bjai1 ,mr4 ,stone was    
indicted by a grand jury on seven       
counts1 including one count of          
obstruction of an official proceeding1  
in violation of sections #aeje and #b of
 title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code1 and  
five counts of making false statements  
in violation of sections #ajja7;a77#b7  
and #b of title #ah1 ,united ,states    
,code2 ,whereas the ,department of      
,justice requested via letter on ,august
 #bj1 #bjai1 that the ,house voluntarily
 provide to it a copy of the            
on-the-record portions of the audio     
backup file of ,mr4 ,stone's ,september 
#bf1 #bjag1 transcribed interview2      
,whereas by the privileges and rights of
 the ,house of ,representatives1 an     

audio backup file of ,mr4 ,stone's      
transcribed interview may not be taken  
from the possession or control of the   
,clerk of the ,house of ,representatives
 by mandate of process of the article   
,,iii courts of the ,united ,states1 and
 may not be provided pursuant to        
requests by the court or the parties to 
,united ,states of ,america v4 ,stone   
except at the direction of the ,house2  
and ,whereas it is the judgment of the  
,house of ,representatives that1 in the 
particular circumstances of this case1  
providing a copy of the on-the-record   
portions of the audio backup file of    
,mr4 ,stone's transcribed interview to  
the prosecuting attorneys in the case of
 ,united ,states v4 ,stone would promote
 the ends of justice in a manner        
consistent with the privileges and      
rights of the ,house3 ,now1 therefore1  
be it ,that the ,house of               
,representatives directs the ,clerk of  
the ,house to provide for use at trial a
 copy of the on-the-record portions of  

the audio backup file of the transcribed
 interview of ,roger ,j4 ,stone ,jr4    
that was conducted by the ,permanent    
,select ,committee on ,intelligence of  
the ,house of ,representatives on       
,september #bf1 #bjag1 to the           
prosecuting attorneys in the case of    
,united ,states of ,america v4 ,stone1  
,no4 #a3ai-;cr-#jjjah-;,,abj            
7,d4,d4,c474  ,clerk4