,,iv  #aaf? ,,congress  #a/ ,session    
,h4 ,,res4 #cjd  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(     
,,repres5tatives  ,april #aj1 #bjai,mr4 
,gre5 ( ,t5nessee 7= himself1 ,mr4      
,jordan1 ,mr4 ,com]1 ,mr4 ,norman1 ,mr4 
,higg9s ( ,l\isiana1 ,mr4 ,cl\d1 ,mr4   
,gro?man1 ,mr4 ,mead[s1 ,mr4 ,gos>1 ,mr4
 ,/eube1 ,mr4 ,gibbs1 ,mr4 ,hice (      
,georgia1 ,mr4 ,arm/rong1 & ,mr4 ,roy7  
submitt$ ! foll[+ resolution2 :i* 0     
ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,rules        
,,resolution  ,rais+ a "q ( ! privileges
 ( ! ,h\se4  ,:]eas ,mi*ael ,coh5       
te/ifi$ "u oa? z a witness be=e ! ,h\se 
,committee on ,ov]sight & ,re=m on      
,febru>y #bg1 #bjai2 ,:]eas ,mi*ael     
,coh5 falsely te/ifi$ "u oa?1 ,i h nev] 
ask$ =1 nor w\ld ,i accept1 a p>don f   
,presid5t ,trump2 ,:]eas 9 tru? & fact1 
attorney = ,mi*ael ,coh51 ,lanny ,davis1
 admitt$ on ,m>* #f1 #bjai1 t ,coh5     
direct$ 8 attorney to explore           
possibilities ( a p>don at "o po9t )    
,donald ,j4 ,trump lawy] ,rudy ,giuliani
 z well z o!r lawy]s advis+ ,presid5t   

,trump2 ,:]eas 9 tru? & fact1 attorney =
 ,mi*ael ,coh51 ,mi*ael ,monico1 admitt$
 9 a ,m>* #ab1 #bjai1 lett] t ,coh5's   
te/imony 0 inaccurate2 ,:]eas 9 tru? &  
fact1 ! ex po/ repres5tation by ,coh5's 
attorney does n annul ,coh5's           
int5tionally false & mislead+ te/imony2 
,:]eas 9 tru? & fact1 ,coh5's te/imony  
"u oa? 0 deliv]$ 9 ! context ( apologiz+
 = all 8 crim9al activities2 ,:]eas 9   
tru? & fact1 ,coh5's d5ial ( ev] seek+ a
 p>don conta9$ no qualifi]s ab\t !      
context ( 8 /atem5t2 ,:]eas 9 tru? &    
fact1 ,coh5's d5ial ( ev] seek+ a p>don1
 z utt]$ "u oa? 9 8 te/imony1 0 absolute
 & unequivocal2 ,:]eas 9 tru? & fact1   
,coh5 te/ifi$ "u oa? t he & 8 lawy]s    
sp5t h\rs edit+ 8 writt5 /atem5t        
submitt$ to ! ,committee on ,ov]sight & 
,re=m prec$+ 8 te/imony1 :i* includ$ !  
writt5 ass]tion1 ,i h nev] ask$ =1 nor  
w\ld ,i accept1 a p>don f ,presid5t     
,trump2 ,:]eas 9 tru? & fact1 ,coh5's   
d5ial 9 8 writt5 /atem5t ( nev] ask+ = a
 ,presid5tial p>don 0 an unqualifi$     

ass]tion2 ,:]eas ,mi*ael ,coh5 falsely  
te/ifi$ "u oa? t he did n want to g to !
 ,:ite ,h\se & he did n want a role or  
title 9 ! adm9i/ration2 ,:]eas 9 tru? & 
fact ! ,unit$ ,/ates ,attorney's ,(fice 
= ! ,s\!rn ,di/rict ( ,new ,york        
submitt$ to ,f$]al c\rt a s5t5c+        
memor&um express+ ,mi*ael ,coh5's desire
 to "w 9 ! ,:ite ,h\se1 expla9+3 dur+ & 
aft] ! campaign1 ,coh5 privately told   
fri5ds & colleagues1 includ+ 9 seiz$    
text messages1 t he expect$ to be giv5 a
 prom95t role & title 9 ! new           
adm9i/ration4 ,:5 t did n mat]ialize1   
,coh5 f\nd a way to monetize 8          
relation%ip ) & access to ! ,presid5t2  
,:]eas ,mi*ael ,coh5 falsely te/ifi$ "u 
oa? on o!r factual matt]s ( mat]ial     
significance2 ,:]eas ,mi*ael ,coh5's    
int5tionally false te/imony 0 aim$ at   
obscur+ ! tru? & ameliorat+ ! ext5t ( 8 
own p]sonal emb>rassm5t2 ,:]eas         
int5tionally false te/imony to a        
,committee ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives  
h>ms ! integrity ( ! proce$+s ( ! ,h\se2

 ,:]eas x is a ,f$]al crime to provide  
false in=mation to ,congress & ! failure
 to en=ce ?is crime fur!r und]m9es !    
integrity ( ! ,h\se2 & ,:]eas x is !    
judgm5t ( ! ,h\se ( ,repres5tatives t   
provid+ a copy ( ! (ficial transcript ( 
! he>+ ( ! ,committee on ,ov]sight &    
,re=m on ,febru>y #bg1 #bjai1 to !      
,dep>tm5t ( ,ju/ice w\ld aid ! ,attorney
 ,g5]al's consid]ation ( inve/igation & 
pot5tial prosecution ( ,mi*ael ,coh5's  
crim9al conduct3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x  ,t ! 
,h\se ( ,repres5tatives directs ! ,*air 
( ! ,ov]sight & ,re=m ,committee to     
submit to ! ,attorney ,g5]al an (ficial 
copy ( ! transcript ( ! he>+ dur+ :i*   
,mi*ael ,coh5 te/ifi$ "u oa? on ,febru>y
 #bg1 #bjai4