,h4 ,,res4 #bdf ,in the ,house of ,representatives1 ,u4 ,s41 ,july #bc1 #bjai ,,resolution ,whereas the democratic1 ,jewish ,state of ,israel is a key ally and strategic partner of the ,united ,states2 ,whereas since ,israel's founding in #aidh1 ,congress has repeatedly expressed our ,nation's unwavering commitment to the security of ,israel as a ,jewish and democratic state2 ,whereas it is a hallmark of ,american democracy for citizens to petition the ,united ,states ,government in favor of or against ,united ,states foreign policy2 ,whereas the ,united ,states ,constitution protects the rights of ,united ,states citizens to articulate political views1 including with respect to the policies of the ,united ,states or foreign governments2 ,whereas ,american policy has long sought to bring peace to the ,middle ,east and recognized that both the ,israeli and ,palestinian people should be able to live in safe and sovereign states1 free from fear and violence1 with mutual recognition2 ,whereas support for peace between the ,israelis and ,palestinians has long-standing bipartisan support in ,congress2 ,whereas it is the long-standing policy of the ,united ,states that a peaceful resolution to the ,israeli-,palestinian conflict should come through direct negotiations between the ,government of ,israel and the ,palestinian ,authority1 with the support of countries in the region and around the world2 ,whereas cooperation between ,israel and the ,united ,states is of great importance1 especially in the context of rising anti-,semitism1 authoritarianism and security problems in ,europe1 the ,middle ,east1 and ,north ,africa2 ,whereas the ,global ,boycott1 ,divestment and ,sanctions ,movement 7,,bds ,movement7 targeting ,israel is a campaign that does not favor a two-state solution and that seeks to exclude the ,state of ,israel and the ,israeli people from the economic1 cultural1 and academic life of the rest of the world2 ,whereas the ,global ,boycott1 ,divestment and ,sanctions ,movement is one of several recent political movements that undermines the possibility for a negotiated solution to the ,israeli-,palestinian conflict by demanding concessions of one party alone and encouraging the ,palestinians to reject negotiations in favor of international pressure2 ,whereas the founder of the ,global ,,bds ,movement1 ,omar ,barghouti1 has denied the right of the ,jewish people in their homeland1 saying1 ,we oppose a ,jewish state in any part of ,palestine4 ,no ,palestinian1 rational ,palestinian1 not a sell-out ,palestinian1 will ever accept a ,jewish state in ,palestine42 ,whereas the ,global ,,bds ,movement targets not only the ,israeli government but also ,israeli academic1 cultural1 and civil society institutions1 as well as individual ,israeli citizens of all political persuasions1 religions1 and ethnicities1 and in some cases even ,jews of other nationalities who support ,israel2 ,whereas the ,global ,,bds ,movement does not recognize1 and many of its supporters explicitly deny1 the right of the ,jewish people to national self-determination2 ,whereas university-based ,global ,,bds efforts violate the core goals of the university and global cultural development1 which thrive on free and open exchange and debate1 and in some cases1 leads to the intimidation and harassment of ,jewish students and others who support ,israel2 ,whereas the ,global ,,bds ,movement promotes principles of collective guilt1 mass punishment1 and group isolation1 which are destructive of prospects for progress towards peace and a two-state solution2 ,whereas boycotts and similar tools aimed at promoting racial justice and social change have been used effectively in the ,united ,states1 ,south ,africa1 and other parts of the world2 and ,whereas in contrast to protest movements that have sought racial justice and social change1 the ,global ,boycott1 ,divestment and ,sanctions ,movement targeting ,israel is not about promoting coexistence1 civil rights1 and political reconciliation but about questioning and undermining the very legitimacy of the country and its people3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that the ,house of ,representatives-- 7#a7 opposes the ,global ,boycott1 ,divestment1 and ,sanctions ,movement 7,,bds ,movement7 targeting ,israel1 including efforts to target ,united ,states companies that are engaged in commercial activities that are legal under ,united ,states law1 and all efforts to delegitimize the ,state of ,israel2 7#b7 urges ,israelis and ,palestinians to return to direct negotiations as the only way to achieve an end to the ,israeli-,palestinian conflict2 7#c7 affirms the ,constitutional right of ,united ,states citizens to free speech1 including the right to protest or criticize the policies of the ,united ,states or foreign governments2 7#d7 supports the full implementation of the ,united ,states-,israel ,strategic ,partnership ,act of #bjad 7,public ,law #aac-bif2 #abh ,stat4 #djge7 and new efforts to enhance government-wide1 coordinated ,united ,states-,israel scientific and technological cooperation in civilian areas1 such as with respect to energy1 water1 agriculture1 alternative fuel technology1 civilian space technology1 and security1 in order to counter the effects of actions to boycott1 divest from1 or sanction ,israel2 and 7#e7 reaffirms its strong support for a negotiated solution to the ,israeli-,palestinian conflict resulting in two states--a democratic ,jewish ,state of ,israel1 and a viable1 democratic ,palestinian state--living side-by-side in peace1 security1 and mutual recognition4 ,clerk4