,h4 ,,res4 #abd ,in the ,house of ,representatives1 ,u4 ,s41 ,march #bh1 #bjai ,,resolution ,whereas1 on ,july #bf1 #bjag1 ,president ,trump announced via ,twitter that the ,united ,states ,government would reverse the existing policy of allowing transgender servicemembers to serve openly in order to implement a ban on transgender people from serving in the ,armed ,forces2 ,whereas transgender servicemembers have served openly since #bjaf1 bravely defending our ,nation with distinction while preserving unit cohesion and contributing to military readiness2 ,whereas a #bjaf study by the ,,rand ,corporation found that allowing transgender ,americans to serve openly in the ,armed ,forces would have minimal impact on readiness and health care costs and little or no impact on unit cohesion1 operational effectiveness or readiness2 ,whereas thousands of transgender ,americans currently serve actively in the ,armed ,forces and in the ,reserves throughout all branches and military occupational specialties2 ,whereas the ,american ,medical ,association1 the ,american ,psychological ,association1 the ,american ,psychiatric ,association1 and three former military ,surgeons ,general each have affirmed the medical efficacy of transition-related care and have expressed opposition to ,president ,trump's discriminatory ban2 ,whereas the claims attempting to justify ,president ,trump's ban are based on flawed scientific and medical assertions2 ,whereas the ,department of ,defense report from #bjah falsely asserts there is considerable scientific uncertainty regarding the efficacy of transition-related care2 ,whereas there is a global medical consensus that such care is effective1 safe1 and reliable2 ,whereas the ,department of ,defense has failed to provide evidence the existing policy has impaired morale1 unit readiness1 or unit cohesion2 ,whereas all five military ,chiefs of ,staff have testified publicly that the existing policy has had no adverse effect on military readiness2 ,whereas1 on ,august #a1 #bjag1 fifty-six retired generals and admirals released a statement affirming1 ,this proposed ban1 if implemented1 would cause significant disruptions1 deprive the military of mission-critical talent1 and compromise the integrity of transgender troops who would be forced to live a lie1 as well as non-transgender peers who would be forced to choose between reporting their comrades or disobeying policy2 ,whereas at least #ah nations allow transgender people to serve openly and effectively in their armed forces2 ,whereas transgender members of the ,armed ,forces have fought in defense of our freedoms with honor and distinction since our ,nation's founding and have been bestowed with such commendations and awards as the ,bronze ,star and ,purple ,heart for their courage and sacrifices2 ,whereas ,president ,trump's ban on transgender members of the ,armed ,forces targets and stigmatizes a whole class of people2 and ,whereas ,president ,trump's ban on transgender members of the ,armed ,forces would affect all transgender members of the ,armed ,forces and force them to serve under a policy that stigmatizes and devalues their contributions to our ,nation's defense3 ,now1 therefore1 be it ,that the ,house of ,representatives-- 7#a7 strongly opposes ,president ,trump's discriminatory ban on transgender members of the ,armed ,forces2 7#b7 rejects the flawed scientific and medical claims upon which it is based2 and 7#c7 strongly urges the ,department of ,defense to not reinstate ,president ,trump's ban on transgender members of the ,armed ,forces and to maintain an inclusive policy allowing qualified transgender ,americans to enlist and serve in the ,armed ,forces4 ,clerk4