,,iv  #aafth ,,congress  #b;d ,session  
,h4 ,,res4 #aaid  ,,in ,,the ,,house    
,,of ,,representatives  ,october #af1   
#bjbj,mr4 ,collins of ,georgia 7for     
himself1 ,mr4 ,biggs1 ,mr4 ,gosar1 ,mr4 
,hice of ,georgia1 ,mr4 ,budd1 and ,mr4 
,duncan7 submitted the following        
resolution2 which was referred to the   
,committee on ,ethics  ,,resolution     
,expressing the sense of the ,house of  
,representatives that ,nancy ,pelosi    
should be removed from her position as  
,speaker of the ,house of               
,representatives4  ,whereas             
,representative ,nancy ,pelosi assumed  
the office of ,speaker of the ,house of 
,representatives on ,january #c1 #bjai2 
,whereas since ,january #c1 #bjai1      
,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi has spent the   
majority of the ,house of               
,representative's time pursuing baseless
 and fruitless investigations against   
the administration of ,president ,donald
 ,j4 ,trump and those close to him2     
,whereas under the reign of ,speaker    

,nancy ,pelosi1 the ,house of           
,representatives has passed hundreds    
fewer bills than it passed in the #aaeth
 ,congress1 with the majority of its    
attention being turned to committee     
hearings investigating the ,president   
and his aides2 ,whereas1 on ,september  
#bd1 #bjai1 ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi     
unilaterally and unconstitutionally     
announced that the ,house of            
,representatives would begin an         
impeachment inquiry into ,president     
,donald ,j4 ,trump2 ,whereas1 on        
,october #ae1 #bjai1 ,speaker ,nancy    
,pelosi incorrectly stated that there is
 no requirement to vote to begin        
impeachment proceedings against the     
,president of the ,united ,states2      
,whereas1 on ,october #ca1 #bjai1       
,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi oversaw the     
first party-line vote to begin an       
impeachment inquiry into a ,president in
 the history of our country1 permitting 
a resolution that denied the ,president 
due process2 ,whereas ,speaker ,nancy   

,pelosi permitted several ,house        
committees to embark on a fishing       
expedition in hopes she could justify   
her efforts to impeach ,president       
,trump1 only to push through baseless   
articles of impeachment1 impeaching     
,president ,trump on ,december #ah1     
#bjai2 ,whereas1 on ,february #e1 #bjbj1
 ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi ripped up the  
,state of the ,union speech delivered by
 ,president ,trump before the ,american 
people2 ,whereas1 on ,august #ca1 #bjbj1
 ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi visited a      
shuttered hair salon in ,san ,francisco 
where she received a blowout without    
wearing a mask in violation of ,san     
,francisco's laws concerning the        
coronavirus1 forcing the salon owner to 
do her hair1 an action in stark         
contradiction to her hypocritical       
admonitions of the ,president's actions 
during the coronavirus2 ,whereas in the 
days following her unlawful hair salon  
appointment1 ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi    
cast blame on the salon's owner for     

setting her up2 ,whereas1 on ,september 
#ba1 #bjbj1 ,speaker ,pelosi1 while     
discussing the possibility of a second  
attempt by her to impeach ,president    
,trump1 appeared confused and exhibited 
bizarre behavior during an ,,abc        
interview1 blurting out randomly ,good  
,morning1 ,sunday ,morning2 ,whereas    
during the tenure of her speakership1   
,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi has started to  
demonstrate a decline in mental fitness1
 calling into question her ability to   
adequately serve the ,house of          
,representatives and the ,american      
people2 ,whereas ,speaker ,nancy        
,pelosi1 having failed in all previous  
endeavors to remove ,president ,trump1  
is now calling for an invocation of the 
#beth ,amendment1 claiming ,president   
,trump is unfit to continue serving as  
,president2 ,whereas the #beth          
,amendment provides that the ,vice      
,president shall become ,president in   
case of the removal of the ,president   
from office or of his death or          

resignation2 ,whereas the ,constitution 
provides two processes for removing the 
,president from office1 the first of    
which is impeachment1 which ,speaker    
,nancy ,pelosi unsuccessfully attempted1
 and the second of which requires the   
,vice ,president and a majority of      
either the principal officers of the    
executive departments or of such other  
body as ,congress may by law provide1   
transmit to the ,president pro tempore  
of the ,senate and the ,speaker a       
written declaration that the ,president 
is unable to discharge the power and    
duties of his office2 ,whereas any      
efforts outside of impeachment to remove
 ,president ,trump must have the consent
 of ,vice ,president ,mike ,pence2      
,whereas ,speaker ,pelosi has           
historically ignored the ,constitution's
 obligations and requirements and has   
recently signaled she will do so again  
in her continuing efforts to remove     
,president ,trump2 ,whereas1 as ,speaker
 of the ,house1 ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi 

is third in the line of succession2 and 
,whereas ,speaker ,nancy ,pelosi's      
unwillingness to abide by the           
,constitution and her recent actions    
that call into question her own mental  
fitness to continue serving as ,speaker 
of the ,house demand her removal from   
the line of succession3 ,now1 therefore1
 be it ,that it is the sense of the     
,house of ,representatives that-- 7#a7  
,representative ,nancy ,pelosi is       
mentally unfit to continue serving as   
,speaker of the ,house of               
,representatives2 and  7#b7             
,representative ,nancy ,pelosi should be
 removed from her position as ,speaker4