,i #aafth ,,congress #b;d ,session ,h4 ,r4 #gedd ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,july #i1 #bjbj,mr4 ,lewis 7for himself1 ,ms4 ,kelly of ,illinois1 ,mr4 ,grijalva1 and ,ms4 ,jackson ,lee7 introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,energy and ,commerce ,a ,,bill ,to amend the ,public ,health ,service ,act to require reporting by the ,national ,institutes of ,health on requests for funding research that were not granted and had the greatest potential for improving public health1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the ,missed ,opportunities in ,public ,health and ,biomedical ,research ,act of #bjbj4 #b4 ,findings ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,biomedical research sponsored by the ,national ,institutes of ,health 7refered to in this section as the ,,nih7 provides numerous treatments and discoveries that improve and save lives1 defend the ,nation against bioterrorism and emerging pandemics1 strengthen the national economy1 and support the next generation of researchers in the ,united ,states4 7#b7 ,while the ,,nih is the largest source of funding for medical research in the world1 the percentage of grants awarded has fallen over the last #bj years4 7#c7 ,the ,,nih ,center for ,scientific ,review works with over #be1jjj expert reviewers and applies the highest level of scientific and ethical standards to almost #ej1jjj competitive grant applications every year4 7#d7 ,the ,,nih's peer review process is a time-tested and proven method of identifying the most promising biomedical research proposals4 #c4 ,annual reporting by ,,nih on missed opportunities ,the ,public ,health ,service ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #bja et seq47 is amended by inserting after section #djc;,d of such ,act 7#db ,u4,s4,c4 #bhc;a-#c7 the following3 #djc;,e4 ,annual reporting on missed opportunities 7a7 ,in general ,not later than the last day of the first fiscal quarter following the end of each fiscal year1 the ,director of ,,nih shall submit a report to ,congress identifying1 with respect to each national research institute1 each national center1 and the ,office of the ,director of ,,nih-- 7#a7 the success rate of research project grant applications reviewed during such fiscal year2 7#b7 the top two research project grant applications reviewed during such fiscal year that were not funded2 and 7#c7 if the success rate described in paragraph 7#a7 is lower than #cb percent1 the top research project grant applications that were reviewed and could have been funded to achieve a success rate of at least #cb percent4 7b7 ,trade secrets and confidential information2 researcher names ,this section does not authorize the ,secretary to disclose-- 7#a7 any information that is a trade secret or confidential information subject to section #eeb7;b77#d7 of title #e1 ,united ,states ,code1 or section #aije of title #ah1 ,united ,states ,code2 or 7#b7 the names of the researchers proposed to carry out research pursuant to unfunded research project grant applications described in subsection 7a74 7c7 ,definitions ,in this section3 7#a7 ,the term success rate means the percentage of research project grant applications reviewed during the respective fiscal year that received funding4 7#b7 ,the term top means having the greatest potential for-- 7,a7 improving public health2 7,b7 advancing biomedical and behavioral research2 and 7,c7 increasing fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems1 and the application of that knowledge towards enhancing health1 lengthening life1 and reducing illness and disability4 4