,i #aafth ,,congress #ast ,session ,h4 ,r4 #gjj ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of ,,representatives ,january #bb1 #bjai ,mr4 ,conaway introduced the following bill2 which was referred to the ,committee on ,armed ,services ,a ,,bill ,to increase the number of operational aircraft carriers of the ,navy1 and for other purposes4 #a4 ,short title ,this ,act may be cited as the #ab ,carrier ,act4 #b4 ,findings ,congress finds the following3 7#a7 ,the aircraft carrier can fulfill the ,navy's core missions of forward presence1 sea control1 ensuring safe sea lanes1 and power projection as well as providing flexibility and versatility to execute a wide range of additional missions4 7#b7 ,forward airpower is integral to the security and joint forces operations of the ,united ,states4 ,carriers play a central role in delivering forward airpower from sovereign territory of the ,united ,states in both permissive and nonpermissive environments4 7#c7 ,aircraft carriers provide our ,nation the ability to rapidly and decisively respond to national threats1 as well as conducting worldwide1 on-station diplomacy and providing deterrence against threats to the ,united ,states allies1 partners1 and friends4 7#d7 ,since the end of the cold war1 aircraft carrier deployments have increased while the aircraft carrier force structure has declined4 7#e7 ,considering the increased array of complex threats across the globe1 the ,navy aircraft carrier is operating at maximum capacity1 increasing deployment lengths and decreasing maintenance periods in order to meet operational requirements4 7#f7 ,to meet global peacetime and wartime requirements1 the ,navy has indicated a requirement to maintain two aircraft carriers deployed overseas and have three additional aircraft carriers capable of deploying within #ij days4 ,however1 the ,navy has indicated that the existing aircraft carrier force structure cannot support these military requirements4 7#g7 ,despite the requirement to maintain an aircraft carrier strike group in both the ,united ,states ,central ,command and ,united ,states ,pacific ,command1 the ,navy has been unable to generate sufficient capacity to support our combatant commanders and has developed significant carrier gaps in these critical areas4 7#h7 ,because of continuing use of a diminished aircraft carrier force structure1 extensive maintenance availabilities result which typically exceed program costs and increase time in shipyards4 ,these expansive maintenance availabilities exacerbate existing carrier gaps4 7#i7 ,because of maintenance overhaul extensions1 the ,navy is truncating basic aircraft carrier training to expedite the deployment of available aircraft carriers4 ,limiting aircraft carrier training decreases operational capabilities and increases sailor risk4 7#aj7 ,the ,navy has adopted a two-phase acquisition strategy for the ,u4,s4,s4 ,john ,f4 ,kennedy 7,,cvn-#gi71 an action that will delay the introduction of this aircraft carrier by up to two years1 exacerbating existing carrier gaps4 7#aa7 ,developing an alternative design to the ,ford-class aircraft carrier is not cost beneficial4 ,a smaller design is projected to incur significant design and engineering cost while significantly reducing magazine size1 carrier air wing size1 sortie rate1 and on-station effectiveness among other vital factors when compared to the ,ford class4 ,furthermore1 a new design will delay the introduction of future aircraft carriers1 exacerbating existing carrier gaps and threatening the national security of the ,united ,states4 #c4 ,increase in number of operational aircraft carriers of the ,navy 7a7 ,increase ,section #hjfb7;b7 of title #aj1 ,united ,states ,code1 is amended by striking #aa operational aircraft carriers and inserting #ab operational aircraft carriers4 7b7 ,effective date ,the amendment made by subsection 7a7 shall take effect on ,september #cj1 #bjbc4