,i  #aaf? ,,congress  #a/ ,session  ,h4 
,r4 #dh  ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,(             
,,repres5tatives  ,janu>y #c1 #bjai,ms4 
,jackson ,lee introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2  
:i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on !       
,judici>y1 & 9 addition to ! ,committee 
on ,homel& ,security1 = a p]iod to be   
subsequ5tly det]m9$ by ! ,speak]1 9 ea* 
case = consid]ation ( su* provisions z  
fall )9 ! jurisdiction ( ! committee    
conc]n$  ,a ,,bill  ,to prohibit taxpay]
 funds f be+ us$ to build a wall betwe5 
,mexico & ! ,unit$ ,/ates1 & = o!r      
purposes4  #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may
 be cit$ z ! ,protect ,am]ican ,taxpay]s
 & ,secure ,bord] ,act4  #b4            
,prohibitions & requirem5ts relat+ to   
bord] security  7a7 ,9 g5]al ,no taxpay]
 funds may be obligat$ or exp5d$ to     
build a wall or b>ri] int5d$ to imp$e   
travel betwe5 ,mexico & ! ,unit$ ,/ates4
  7b7 ,=eign paym5t requir$ ,any wall or
 b>ri] describ$ 9 subsection 7a7 t is   
propos$ to be built %all be paid = us+  
funds provid$ by ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,mexico4 

7c7 ,secur+ ! s\!rn bord] ,! ,secret>y (
 ,homel& ,security %all take su* actions
 z may be necess>y to secure ! s\!rn    
bord] by mak+ maximum effective         
utilization ( te*nology & improv$ tra9+ 
( ,u4,s4 ,cu/om & ,bord] ,protection    
ag5ts & (fic]s4  7d7 ,increase 9        
immigration judges ,! ,attorney ,g5]al  
may appo9t #ajj additional immigration  
judges 9 addition to immigration judges 
curr5tly s]v+ z ( ! date ( ! enactm5t ( 
?is ,act4  7e7 ,humanit>ian assi/ance ,!
 ,secret>y ( ,homel& ,security %all take
 su* actions z may be necess>y to ensure
 t humanit>ian assi/ance is provid$ to  
immigrants1 refugees1 & o!r displac$    
p]sons :o are 9 ne$ ( m$ical assi/ance &
 aid to su/a9 heal? & life4