,i  #aafth ,,congress  #ast ,session    
,h4 ,r4 #ddid  ,,in ,,the ,,house ,,of  
,,representatives  ,september #be1      
#bjai,mr4 ,peterson 7for himself1 ,mr4  
,stauber1 ,mr4 ,sensenbrenner1 ,mr4     
,gallagher1 ,mr4 ,kind1 ,mr4 ,moolenaar1
 and ,mr4 ,huizenga7 introduced the     
following bill2 which was referred to   
the ,committee on ,natural ,resources   
,a ,,bill  ,to direct the ,secretary of 
the ,interior to reissue a final rule   
relating to listing of the gray wolf in 
the ,western ,great ,lakes under the    
,endangered ,species ,act of #aigc1 and 
for other purposes4  #a4 ,short title   
,this ,act may be cited as the ,gray    
,wolf ,state ,management ,act of #bjai4 
#b4 ,reissuance of final rule regarding 
gray wolves in the ,western ,great      
,lakes ,before the end of the #fj-;day  
period beginning on the date of         
enactment of this ,act1 the ,secretary  
of the ,interior shall reissue the final
 rule published on ,december #bh1 #bjaa 
7#gf ,fed4 ,reg4 #hafff71 without regard

 to any other provision of statute or   
regulation that applies to issuance of  
such rule4  #c4 ,sense of ,congress     
regarding ,state consultation with      
,tribal governments ,it is the sense of 
,congress that-- 7#a7 ,indian ,tribes in
 ,minnesota1 ,wisconsin1 and ,michigan  
are sovereign governments and retain    
certain rights to regulate natural      
resources used by their members on      
,tribal lands and public lands on       
reservations2 and  7#b7 when drafting   
any ,state wolf management plan1 each of
 the ,states of ,minnesota1 ,wisconsin1 
and ,michigan should consult early and  
fully with each affected ,tribal        
government4