,i #aaf? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,r4 #aeae ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,m>* #e1 #bjai,mr4 ,la,malfa introduc$ ! foll[+ bill2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,transportation & ,infra/ructure ,a ,,bill ,to direct ! ,secret>y ( ,transportation to require t any discretion>y grant funds provid$ by ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,transportation = high-spe$ rail developm5t 9 ,cali=nia be reimburs$ to ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t & to au?orize additional funds = nationally significant freight & highway projects4 #a4 ,%ort title ,?is ,act may be cit$ z ! ,high-,spe$ ,refund ,act4 #b4 ,f9d+s ,congress f9ds ! foll[+3 7#a7 ,:5 pres5t$ to vot]s 9 #bjjh1 ,cali=nia's high-spe$ rail sy/em 0 project$ to co/ #cc4f billion = a l9e f ,san ,francisco to ,anaheim1 increas+ #dj billion to add l9es to ,sacram5to & ,san ,diego4 7#b7 ,! exp&$ project's co/ swell$ to m ?an #ajj billion1 ) ! ,san ,francisco to ,anaheim l9e co/+ m ?an #gg billion1 & n[ ! ,/ate ( ,cali=nia's high-spe$ rail plan no long] includes any /ops 9 ,sacram5to1 ,san ,francisco1 ,los ,angeles1 ,anaheim1 or ,san ,diego4 7#c7 ,:5 pres5t$ to vot]s 9 #bjjh1 ,cali=nia claim$ ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t w\ld pay betwe5 a qu>t] & a ?ird ( ! co/ ( ! rail sy/em4 7#d7 ,! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t _h no su* grant program at ! "t1 & ! #d billion inve/$ 9 ! project repres5ts less ?an #e p]c5t ( ! updat$ co/ projections4 7#e7 ,at ! curr5t level ( project employm5t x w\ld take ne>ly #djj ye>s to accompli% ! #a1jjj1jjj job-ye>s promis$ by ! ,cali=nia ,high-,spe$ ,rail ,au?ority4 7#f7 ,no significant private companies h inve/$ 9 ! ,cali=nia high-spe$ rail project4 7#g7 ,! grant creation & aw>d process = ! ,cali=nia high-spe$ rail project did n incorporate ! be/ practices ( ,gov]nm5t fund+4 7#h7 ,! grant agreem5t betwe5 ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t & ,cali=nia did n require a feasible fund+ package to be prep>$ be=e aw>d+ funds1 :i* simil> mass transit programs require4 7#i7 ,! grant agreem5t betwe5 ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t & ,cali=nia did n require a m9imum op]able segm5t be=e aw>d+ funds1 :i* simil> mass transit programs require4 7#aj7 ,! grant agreem5t betwe5 ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t & ,cali=nia did n require new high-spe$ tra9s to run on ! new high-spe$ rail sy/em4 7#aa7 ,! ,dep>tm5t ( ,transportation inappropriately all[$ ! ,/ate ( ,cali=nia to sp5d ,f$]al money )\t a requir$ ,/ate fund+ mat*4 7#ab7 ,! ,cali=nia ,high-,spe$ ,rail ,au?ority repeat$ly fail$ to meet deadl9es & und]e/imat$ co/s4 7#ac7 ,on ,m>* #e1 #bjai1 ! ,f$]al ,rail ,adm9i/ration1 hav+ recogniz$ ! failure ( ,cali=nia to build ev5 a small fraction ( ! orig9ally approv$ high-spe$ rail sy/em1 deobligat$ ne>ly #a billion 9 ,f$]al fund+4 7#ad7 ,no pass5g] rail sy/em 9 ! _w has ev] be5 fully self-suffici5t4 7#ae7 ,!re are doz5s ( wor?y infra/ructure projects t w\ld improve ! quality ( life = e day ,am]icans & c\ld easily h be5 design$1 approv$1 built1 & h b5efitt$ local economies 9 ! "t x took = ,cali=nia's high-spe$ rail proposal to fail4 #c4 ,s5se ( ,congress ,x is ! ,s5se ( ,congress t any future high-spe$ rail grant programs t are aw>d$ funds by ! ,f$]al ,gov]nm5t %\ld h simil> or high] requirem5ts ?an exi/+ mass transit programs4 #d4 ,treatm5t ( funds provid$ = high-spe$ rail developm5t 9 ,cali=nia 7a7 ,reimbursem5t ( funds ,! ,secret>y ( ,transportation %all take su* action z is necess>y to require t any discretion>y grant funds provid$ to ! ,/ate ( ,cali=nia by ! ,dep>tm5t ( ,transportation = high-spe$ rail corridor developm5t be reimburs$ to ! g5]al fund ( ! ,treasury4 7b7 ,au?orization ( appropriations = nationally significant freight & highway projects ,section #aaja7;a77#e77;,e7 ( ! ,,fa/ ,act 7#bc ,u4,s4,c4 #aja note7 is am5d$ by /rik+ #a1jjj1jjj1jjj = fiscal ye> #bjbj & ins]t+ #d1ejj1jjj1jjj = fiscal ye> #bjbj4