,,iv #aaf? ,,congress #a/ ,session ,h4 ,,con4 ,,res4 #g ,,9 ,,! ,,h\se ,,( ,,repres5tatives ,janu>y #bd1 #bjai,mr4 ,yoho 7= himself1 ,mr4 ,mooney ( ,we/ ,virg9ia1 ,mr4 ,ha/+s1 ,mr4 ,jones1 ,mr4 ,higg9s ( ,l\isiana1 ,mr4 ,graves ( ,l\isiana1 & ,mr4 ,mit*ell7 submitt$ ! foll[+ concurr5t resolution2 :i* 0 ref]r$ to ! ,committee on ,ways & ,means1 & 9 addition to ! ,committee on ,agriculture1 = a p]iod to be subsequ5tly det]m9$ by ! ,speak]1 9 ea* case = consid]ation ( su* provisions z fall )9 ! jurisdiction ( ! committee conc]n$ ,,concurr5t ,,resolution ,express+ ! s5se ( ,congress t all direct & indirect subsidies t b5efit ! production or export ( sug> by all major sug>-produc+ & -consum+ c\ntries %\ld be elim9at$4 ,:]eas e major sug>-produc+ & sug>-consum+ c\ntry 9 ! _w ma9ta9s "s =m ( direct or indirect subsidy to support its sug> gr[]s1 processors1 or consum]s2 ,:]eas virtually all ( ! m ?an #ajj c\ntries t produce sug> ma9ta9 m>ket-di/ort+ subsidy programs1 includ+-- 7#a7 ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,brazil :i* provides direct & indirect subsidies ( at lea/ #b1ejj1jjj1jjj p] ye> = programs to promote its sug> & e?anol indu/ry & has increas$ subsidies 9 rec5t ye>s 9 ! =m ( pref]5tial loans1 debt =giv5ess1 & increas$ e?anol usage m&ates2 7#b7 ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,india :i* provides at lea/ #a1gjj1jjj1jjj p] ye> 9 subsidy supports to prop up its ineffici5t sug> indu/ry1 includ+ ,,wto-illegal export subsidies 9 #bjad1 #bjae1 & #bjah2 7#c7 ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,?ail& :i* has m ?an tripl$ its sug> exports s9ce #bjjd by provid+ at lea/ #a1cjj1jjj1jjj 9 subsidies & gov]nm5t programs to its sug> indu/ry & by ma9ta9+ dome/ic prices well above export prices2 7#d7 ! ,gov]nm5t ( ! ,european ,union :i* is s5d+ an e/imat$ #ffe1jjj1jjj p] ye> 9 subsidies to sug> f>m]s2 & 7#e7 ! ,gov]nm5t ( ,mexico :i* has us$ direct & indirect subsidies to keep op5 sug> mills own$ by private indu/ry & ! gov]nm5t has s5t direct paym5ts to sug>cane gr[]s1 & has be5 f\nd guilty ( injur+ ,unit$ ,/ates sug> produc]s by dump+ subsidiz$ sug> into ! ,unit$ ,/ates m>ket2 ,:]eas ! _w sug> m>ket is ! mo/ volatile commodity m>ket 9 ! _w2 ,:]eas ! =ego+ clauses provide ample evid5ce !re is no undi/ort$1 free m>ket 9 sug> 9 ! _w today2 & ,:]eas if su* a free m>ket did exi/1 ,unit$ ,/ates sug> f>m]s & processors c\ld compete effectively 9 t m>ket3 ,n[1 !re=e1 be x ,t x is ! s5se ( ,congress t-- 7#a7 ! ,presid5t %\ld seek elim9ation ( all direct & indirect subsidies b5efit+ ! production or export ( sug> by ! gov]nm5t (-- 7,a7 ea* c\ntry t export$ m ?an #bjj1jjj metric tons ( sug> 9 #bjaf1 #bjag1 or #bjah2 & 7,b7 by any o!r c\ntry ) :i* ! ,unit$ ,/ates has 9 effect a free trade agreem5t2 7#b7 if ! ,presid5t det]m9es t all su* subsidies by all su* c\ntries h be5 elim9at$1 ! ,presid5t %\ld submit a report to ,congress provid+ detail$ in=mation ab\t h[ ea* ( ! c\ntries has elim9at$ su* subsidies2 & 7#c7 aft] submitt+ su* a report1 ! ,presid5t %\ld propose to ,congress legislation to implem5t ,unit$ ,/ates sug> policy re=ms4